From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 09:23, 8 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Claremont Colleges Rugby Football Club

Claremont Colleges Rugby Football Club (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not very familiar with sports notability, but the two athletics teams for the Claremont Colleges, Pomona-Pitzer Sagehens and Claremont-Mudd-Scripps Stags and Athenas (both Division 3), were barely considered notable themselves, so I had concerns when I came across this page, and my inquiry at the sports WikiProject leads me to believe an AfD discussion is needed. There is a bunch of coverage from The Student Life, the Claremont Colleges' newspaper, and the team seems fairly successful, but WP:RSSM states a topic which can be sourced almost exclusively to student media, with little or no evidence of wider coverage in mass market general interest media, is not likely to be viewed as passing WP:GNG on the basis of student media coverage alone. {{u| Sdkb}} talk 00:00, 24 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. {{u| Sdkb}} talk 00:00, 24 August 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. {{u| Sdkb}} talk 00:00, 24 August 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions. {{u| Sdkb}} talk 00:00, 24 August 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. {{u| Sdkb}} talk 00:00, 24 August 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Aaqib Anjum Aafī ( talk) 06:06, 1 September 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: No reliable sources, as nom said, student publications do not pass GNG. The page also seems a bit of a mess, external links in the body and a whole section called "Pending" — Yours, Berrely •  TalkContribs 08:16, 1 September 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.