- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect. Daniel ( talk) 19:24, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
COVID-19 outbreak at the UEFA Euro 2020
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- COVID-19 outbreak at the UEFA Euro 2020 ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There was no outbreak at Euro 2020. A few people got COVID, sure, but nothing that should called an outbreak. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 21:29, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 21:29, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of COVID-19-related deletion discussions.
Shellwood (
talk) 21:49, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
- I made this in the light of the controversy of the fans crowding teach other. I am not sure if this should be renamed, redirected or stay deleted because there are other cases related to football events? SpinnerLaserzthe2nd ( talk) 21:30, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
- Procedural close because the article is turned into a redirect by its creator. enjoyer -- talk 10:48, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:24, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:24, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:25, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Redirect - do not procedural close, we need consensus on this to avoid re-creation in the future. The redirect is the right call. Giant Snowman 06:04, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as there wasn't an outbreak, just a few people testing positive. An article doesn't pass WP:GNG, and redirect is too sensationalist, and therefore misleading. Also, procedural close would be wrong, as the article shouldn't be blanked during an AFD anyway (it's on the AFD template). Joseph 2302 ( talk) 09:28, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- Redirect per above, although not accurate, it could be a possible search term, and it's WP:CHEAP. Govvy ( talk) 10:36, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.