The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:47, 20 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Arcalife.com

Arcalife.com (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This website is defunct, arguable non-notable and the article has had an advert tag stuck on it for three years. It's about time we considered whether we actually need this article. Rcsprinter¹²³ (confer) 14:59, 13 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (cajole) 14:59, 13 December 2015 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter¹²³ (commune) 15:00, 13 December 2015 (UTC) reply

• Delete – fails WP:GNG. I understand WP:NTEMP but this has insufficient reliable coverage. sst✈ ^(discuss) 15:05, 13 December 2015 (UTC) reply
• Delete – It was not notable, and now it can never become notable. Ceosad ( talk) 17:02, 13 December 2015 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.