The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Drmies (
talk) 02:16, 30 August 2016 (UTC)reply
This was recently listed for deletion as part of a group of articles at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A62 derby. Though it was closed as no consensus, I'm relisting this article as there were no particular claims made for its notability in that debate, which got swamped by the discussion of other articles. Both sides compete in the fifth tier
National League in England and one of them (Woking) have never competed in professional football.
There are no sources that this rivalry is notable; there is no evidence of independent reporting on it, certainly beyond general news coverage that follows most football matches. The teams do consider each other rivals, but that is not the point of contestation here; the point is that this rivalry has no evidence of notability under
general notability guidelines, and that
sports notability states that "Sports rivalries are not inherently notable. Articles on sports rivalries, such as Yankees–Red Sox rivalry, should satisfy the general notability guideline."
Super Nintendo Chalmers (
talk) 08:31, 22 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.
Spiderone 12:58, 22 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete - not enough evidence to show that this rivalry is notable, so fails
WP:GNG. Only one of the sources even calls this a derby, and then its just in passing in a quote from one of the managers.
Ilikeeatingwaffles (
talk) 16:19, 22 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete - per
WP:NRIVALRY, simply playing a few times is insufficient, the article needs to show wider GNG where the notion of the rivalry is discussed (e.g.
Old Firm), not simply an aggregation of a number of match reports. No indication this would ever be anything other than a
stat dump.
Fenix down (
talk) 16:32, 22 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete - no evidence of notability.
GiantSnowman 19:01, 22 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete - nothing more than stats
Spiderone 10:34, 23 August 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete - fails GNG.
WaggersTALK 13:35, 26 August 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.