This user may have left Wikipedia. Tuscumbia has not edited Wikipedia since 2 March 2012. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
I rewrote some of the words in Gryazovets—Vyborg gas pipeline so that it isn't a copyright violation. ☺ Coppertwig ( talk) 01:08, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
Thanks :-)
Are you sure this edit is neutral? The wording "Preempting gas supplies for possible use for Nabucco pipeline is another way of preventing the project from successful completion" seems bad — imagine if someone inserted "another way of preventing the project from completion is to make claims about environmental impact" to Nord Stream. I'm sure that would be reverted on neutrality grounds. Recently an agenda-based account ( User:Gazpr) made some pretty outrageous edits in energy articles. Although most of your edits are good, I have a slight problem with some of your edits as well. Please remember to be neutral as possible. Offliner ( talk) 22:55, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
Materialscientist ( talk) 18:07, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Thank you.
A tag has been placed on Naftoport requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- PhantomSteve/ talk| contribs\ 13:24, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi Tuscumbia,
This article has IMHO gone downhill real quick. I was working on it before midnight (local) and it is now ≈4:20 AM. I have never been so pissed. I mean editors come in and arbritrarily delete whole paragraphs without any discussion. Is that the way it's supposed to work here? I dont think so! Too many 'cooks'! You may find more useable (deleted) material in
Espoo. There is a now lot of redundant material in the 'Suspect' section since someone merged stuff from the deleted Shkupolli article. All yours now, I'm gonna get pissed, or try to, as I said I am already 'pissed' off! Hope you have a better New Year than I have had!
'--
220.101.28.25 (
talk) 17:22, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
for your kind note. Getting there! Still some more to go, and may take me a day or two, but at least now I think we have the main information in it. Tx again.-- Epeefleche ( talk) 14:18, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:57, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
Happy to be of help. :-) -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa? Lo dicono a Signa. 19:19, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
Hello, can you please check this out [1]?-- Marshal Bagramyan ( talk) 15:57, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi Tuscumbia, this is a message from an
automated bot, regarding
Talk:Gyda Oil Field. You
blanked the page and, since you are its sole author, FrescoBot has interpreted it as a request for deletion of the page and asked administrators to satisfy the requests per
speedy deletion criterion G7. Next time you want a page that you've created deleted, you can explicitly request the deletion by inserting the text {{
db-author}}
. If you didn't want the page deleted, please remove the {{
db-author}}
tag from the page and undo your blanking or put some content in the page. Admins are able to
recover deleted pages. Please do not contact the bot operator for issues not related with bot's behaviour. To opt out of these bot messages, add {{
bots|deny=FrescoBot}}
somewhere on your talk page. --
FrescoBot (
msg) 00:53, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose, at their own discretion, sanctions on any editor working on pages broadly related to Armenia- Azerbaijan and related conflicts if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2#Final decision. Stifle ( talk) 09:39, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi Tuscumbia. You reverted my edit to the 2010 Explosion on Deepwater Horizon drilling rig when you made the next edit to the article. Some of the spelling and grammar mistakes I fixed are still in the article now; please be careful so that you don't undo edits by others in the process of making your own. Thanks, - Gump Stump ( talk) 20:52, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
-- tariqabjotu 01:37, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Ali Mustafayev requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.
Riotrocket8676
You gotta problem with that? 19:30, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. -- Ліонкінг ( talk) 19:45, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
Do you know when that census data was taken? -- Golbez ( talk) 13:48, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
Armenian citizens are not allowed into Azerbaijan for private visits, only Armenians citizens invited to attend international events such as sport tournaments and conferences are exempted. Foreign citizens, except those with diplomatic passports, having stamps of the breakaway Nagorno-Karabakh Republic on their passports are also not allowed to enter Azerbaijan. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.214.144.172 ( talk) 23:14, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
No, it's not. After years of discussion here, it seems clear that the NKR has annexed the non-NKAO rayons it occupies. It takes the line of control as a border, rather than just a, well, line of control. Lachin, et.al. are all part of the NKR, and have been distributed into provinces of it. -- Golbez ( talk) 13:52, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Be aware of this. -- Ліонкінг ( talk) 19:32, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
I don't want to speak with You on the Kovsakan (Zangilan) Talk page, as You can create such in each other city and elsewhere, so I'll speak with You here. I remind You that You've done alreade 2 reverts, and if You done the third one You know what will be, so be calm and smart. All Your statements You can prove on the template deletion page. Speaking about statements You've named me a nationalists and other such statements, so first of all You should be careful. -- Ліонкінг ( talk) 20:03, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
Please be aware of this message [5] Aregakn ( talk) 19:46, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
See if you would like to comment this -- Hittit ( talk) 20:32, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
See if you would like to comment the merge of this article. -- Hittit ( talk) 20:49, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
Further to this Arbitration enforcement thread, you are topic banned from all pages relating to Armenia and to Azerbaijan for thirty days from the time of this comment, and also prohibited for a period of four months from the date of this comment from making more than one revert per week. If you violate these restrictions your sanctions will be reset and may be extended, and you may also be blocked from editing. These sanctions are passed further to the provisions of Armenia-Azerbaijan 2.
If at any point you need guidance or advice, or if you need support in the course of contributing, my talk page and e-mail is always open. Edit in a constructive way and you will find Wikipedia's administrators quite willing to give you assistance. Serially edit war on a contested subject area and you will find yourself repeatedly sanctioned. Regards, AGK 01:22, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
Good work, Tuscumbia. Creation of this article was in my 'to do list' and this is really a good news you already done it. Beagel ( talk) 21:08, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
If you look across wikipedia, Dennis Hopper etc you'll see this is actually standard. You had born 1913 which is misleading as she died in 1991. At least have it as (1913-1991). Dr. Blofeld White cat 21:28, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
I don't mean to sound arrogant but do you know how many articles I've written? I've started around 1 in 60 of all wikipedia articles so you'd think I have a pretty good idea of what the norm is mate. Trust me birthdates and year next to name in bold is a standard procedure on here. John F. Kennedy, Ronald Reagan, Alimardan Topchubashov etc. Ask anybody. The infobox is an added touch which is if anything redundant not the intro to the article and the other way around. Veyr much like your work on oilfields and Azerbaijan thought. Keep up the good work which ever format you choose... Dr. Blofeld White cat 21:38, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
If the birthdates don't exist then it is the norm to write the years (1913-1991) but generally from my experience if the birth dates exist you should most certainly include them in the intro. Yes, the infobox does tend to replicate a lot given in the text but it is meant to be a factual summary, this is why. Keep up the good work, nice to see people working on countries like Azerbaijan. If only our Azerbaijani village articles could be expanded!! Dr. Blofeld White cat 09:09, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your work on Valeh Barshadly. I wanted to ask you about the first military unit of the new army. Was the place where it was formed Settlement No. 110? Is Settlement No. 110 and Shikhovo the same place? Is that what the Azerbaijani text means? Buckshot06 (talk) 03:31, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
No problem. I provided citations for the Ministers of Defense article and will keep adding sources as they appear online. Yes, Buckshot, here is the list of chiefs of staff [6] for now but it seems to be incomplete date-wise. So, I'm still looking for concrete dates of their terms. Please let me know if you find any as well. This is the list: Silahlı Qüvvələrin Baş Qərargah rəisləri: (Chiefs of Staff)
Hərbi Dəniz Qüvvələrinin komandanları: (Commanders of the Navy)
Although, some sources are a little off. Valeh Barshadly is shown as Chief of Staff from May to October 1992, when he was removed on September 4, 1992 as per another source Presidential Decree. The dates from those times of political turmoil are really hard to track. Tuscumbia ( talk) 20:35, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi.Please join debate. And tell your opinion. -- Earth Defender ( talk) 11:20, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
Can you please take a look at this? Thank you.-- Marshal Bagramyan ( talk) 04:23, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
This is to inform you that you are topic-banned for three months from pages or edits related to Armenia or Azerbaijan, as explained and detailed in this AE thread. Sandstein 14:40, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
You can write an article coup in Azerbaijan (1992). Here is the text describing these events to the Russian version of article Mutalibov. For such events should be detailed description.
После того как 8 мая пала Шуша у здания Верховного Совета сторонники Муталибова организуют митинг с требованием восстановления его на посту президента. 14 мая на сессии Верховного Совета за восстановление Аяза Муталибова в качестве президента проголосовали 219 из 250 присутствующих в зале депутатов (оппозиция отсутствовала) [1]. В тот же день первым своим указом восстановленый президент ввёл в Баку чрезвычайное положение и комендантский час, запрещены митинги и демонстрации с 0 часов 15 мая [1]. В ответ на восстановление Муталибова на посту президента страны начался митинг сторонников оппозиции у здания НФА. Утром 15 мая руководство Народного фронта выдвинуло Муталибову ультиматум с требованием добровольно уйта до 15.00 с поста президента [1]. С истечением срока ультиматума оппозиция начала марш к президентской резиденции и вскоре захватила власть в городе. Председатель военной комиссии Народного фронта Азербайджана Фахмин Гаджиев в 18.00 по телевидению объявил, что город, кроме президентского дворца, контролируется силами оппозиции, и продлил срок ультиматума президенту до 20.00 [1].В 19 часов объявляется, что все войска переходят под контроль НФА, а в 21 часа без штурма был занят президентский дворец [2].
{{
cite news}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help)
The coup d'etat in Azerbaijan (1992) a very significant event, but almost forgotten. You can write it, too. [8] .
Hello. Recently you added a citation to a book from the " Webster's Quotations, Facts and Phrases" series published by Icon Group International to this article. Unfortunately, Icon Group International is not a reliable source - their books are computer-generated, with most of the text copied from Wikipedia (most entries have [WP] by them to indicate this, see e.g. [9]). I've only removed the reference, not the text it was referencing. I'm removing a lot of similar references as they are circular references; many other editors have also been duped by these sources. Despite giving an appearance of reliability, the name " Webster's" has been public domain since the late 19th century. Another publisher to be wary of as they reuse Wikipedia articles is Alphascript Publishing. Fences& Windows 19:06, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
On July 27, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Chingiz Ildyrym, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Rlevse • Talk • 06:03, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Ogle School of Hair, Skin and Nails requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.
Catfish Jim and the soapdish (
talk) 22:16, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
HI. At the moment, this is case of WP:UPANDCOMING; even if its ex-pupil gets into the news, I doubt if the school would be notable enough for a standalone article, per WP:NOTINHERITED. Regards, JohnCD ( talk) 11:36, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
On August 6, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Jamshid Nakhichevanski, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Rlevse • Talk • 12:03, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
Hi Stifle. There is still no result for my appeal [10]. Could you please follow up and see if the reduction of the topic ban is granted. Appreciate your help in advance. Tuscumbia ( talk) 15:31, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the caption correction, and for the article itself, which is a nice start. To answer your questions:
Lovely! After prime minister, foreign minister is among the most important ministries in Romania (and elsewhere), and you should be proud for having completed this project. - Biruitorul Talk 19:12, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
Sorry, I wasn't able to find a date. The few Romanian sources I've found on the web generally confirm what is already written in the article, and I have some doubts about their use as reliable sources, so I decided to leave the article as it is now. You are one of the few people who created Romania-related real articles (as opposed to one-liners) in the last months, so I guess I am the one who has to thank you! Anonimu ( talk) 17:23, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Good morning. As You're my main opponent it the discussion, please be aware with my mediation request as we have unsolved old discussion and if You Assume good faith make Your agreement. I'll see Your answer next day. Thanks. -- Ліонкінг ( talk) 17:15, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
A request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to Martuni (town) was recently filed. As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. The process of mediation is entirely voluntary and focuses exclusively on the content issues over which there is disagreement. Please review the request page and the guide to mediation requests and then indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you would agree to participate. Discussion relating to the mediation request welcome at the case talk page.
Thank you, AGK 23:08, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
The Request for mediation concerning Martuni (town), to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. An explanation of why it has not been possible to allow this dispute to proceed to mediation is provided at the mediation request page (which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time). Queries on the rejection of this dispute can be directed to the Committee chairperson or e-mailed to the mediation mailing list.
For the Mediation Committee,
AGK 11:45, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
(This message delivered by
MediationBot, an automated bot account
operated by the
Mediation Committee to perform case management.)
Do you think or imagine you are me? if no, never made such kind [15] reverts and for the first read WP:CIVIL. It may halps... Andranikpasha ( talk) 11:54, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
The Azerbaijani Barnstar of National Merit | ||
For all of your excellent articles on Azerbaijan, I award you this Azerbaijan Barnstar of National Merit. Wear it with pride. - Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa? Lo dicono a Signa. 15:22, 2 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
this WikiAward was given to Tuscumbia by Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa? Lo dicono a Signa. on 15:22, 2 November 2010 (UTC) |
Can't believe you haven't gotten one of these yet. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa? Lo dicono a Signa. 15:22, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the compliment... On another note, good that you are working on Norwegian related articles.. You see, I'm Norwegian ;) and most of Norway-related articles are in bad shape, so again, thanks for your contributions. Again thanks and have a good time. -- TIAYN ( talk) 17:03, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Tuscumbia, user Magoteers disrupts everywhere. Looks at this article where he reverts all the time dismissing third party sources: [16]. I think he needs to be reported. Anastasia Bukhantseva 05:05, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Mind WP:CIVIL and please avoid turning this into an ethnic battleground. Thank you.-- Marshal Bagramyan ( talk) 20:17, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
I agree that Tuscumbia is engaging in vandalism and disruptive editing - he is removing citations to scholarly texts and rewriting history.
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Quantum666 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 01:28, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
IP, please don't just revert to your version. I think everybody agrees that the text you included is an important part of the war and needs to be included. You just need to re-write the the text because it's more or less poorly written. — Help rewrite. I'll be very grateful. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
85.141.113.105 (
talk) 15:47, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
Can I ask you for another favour, could help me to copyedit the Andrei Gromyko article?? I would really appreciate some help, and seeing that you helped me on the List of leaders of the Soviet Union article, I would appreciate to receive your help for a second time. -- TIAYN ( talk) 17:39, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
Thanks friend. I really appreciate it. But really you are doing fantastic work on Azerbaijan, especially on politics. Keep it up!♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:48, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for the barnstar! That was really nice of you! -- Rosiestep ( talk) 05:28, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
On 9 December 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article National Assembly of Azerbaijan, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the National Assembly of Azerbaijan was the first secular republican parliament in the Muslim world? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Gatoclass ( talk) 06:04, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
I would not mind seeing at least one source (in Azerbaijani) in that section, no. An overall history, a collection of official documents, speeches and statements, an account of the war during a certain time period, etc.-- Marshal Bagramyan ( talk) 20:03, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
Ah, good show, then, sir. You can pat yourself on the back all you like now that you know you tricked me into saying what you wanted.
For all that, Ayvazyan is the editor to an encyclopedia which has entries written by multiple authors, including historians and military figures who participated in the conflict. If the views expressed in the Azerbaijani source are done without the typical agit-prop nonsense and character assassinations against entire peoples and tarring them with such damaging nouns and adjectives as "barbarians" and "deceptive", I would have no reason to exclude them. What an Azerbaijani is going to feel is, naturally, going to differ with an Armenian's sentiments. Armenians felt that the Karabakh war was one of liberation against seventy years of Azerbaijani oppression and a life or death struggle that was trying to combat a repeat of what took place in Nakhichevan over that same period. Perspective matters.
I'm sorry you're so ill-disposed to even good-faith suggestions. It only seems to make the editing environment here all the more hostile. -- Marshal Bagramyan ( talk) 21:33, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
This is apparently a Azerbaijani government agency. Is there anything about it on the Arm or Az wikis, or elsewhere on the net, that you could point me to? I'd like to create a stub with the mine action authority information that people have added to Azerbaijani Armed Forces that simply doesn't belong there. Buckshot06 (talk) 07:21, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi Tuscumbia. I first heard about these three articles from User:Takabeg a week or two ago - you'll see on my talkpage. I then was re-warned by User:MarshallBagramyan about them yesterday. He asked me to evaluate the sources they were citing because he said the sources cited did not appear to prove the actual existence of the massacres. (He said) the articles were written in such a way as present allegations as facts. Before starting my investigation I bore in mind that MarshallBagramyan had raised the NK War article to FA standard, thus was relatively likely to be able to give some controversial subjects dispassionate treatment. Having checked the English-language sources I saw that they did not prove that actual massacres had taken place. Yes, attacks upon retreating civilians by irregulars had definitely occurred, but whether large numbers of civilians had been deliberately killed in cold blood was not proven. Therefore I decided to delete the articles, without prejudice to their recreation should they appear to present the events in a slightly more balanced fashion. Does that explain my actions more fully? Regards Buckshot06 (talk) 23:14, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
My imagination does have to go too far to venture out the guess that this was done in retaliation for the edits carried out on the massacre articles today. Regardless of what took place, to add frivolous tags in retaliation on another article is a violation of WP:POINT. The same three tags that were found on those articles were all placed in the same order on the Maraghar Massacre article. Since when, pray tell, did sources like BBC News, Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch constitute "unreliable" sources? I can see the point of Caroline Cox being an individual who has great affection for Armenians but, again, to add the unreliability tag seems to not only belabor the point but to emphasize an entirely new one. There was no inherent POV expressed in the article as far as I can tell and everything was properly attributed. That finally brings us to the question of notability. Maraghar may have been poorly-covered in contemporary news sources but its importance in the conflict seems to be warranted by the coverage it has received by the above-mentioned human rights organizations, journalists like Mr. Thomas de Waal, and the editors at BBC.
With that said, I ask you not to make such ill-faith edits nor to retaliate again against other articles when you are having discussions on others elsewhere. Thank you.-- Marshal Bagramyan ( talk) 03:19, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Please stop wholesale reverting another editor's edits. I have added explanations on the talk pages on the Sayat-Nova and Ghazanchetsots Cathedral pages. The content that you have been reinserting indicates that I am justified in calling them blind reverts: you are restoring material that is clearly wrong, such as mistakes in grammar and wording, and in your recent revert to the Zar page you reinserted the incorrect term "calqued", even though it is obviously the wrong term to use in this situation (did you read the wikipedia article it linked to?). 93.97.143.19 ( talk) 14:11, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Azerbaijani wine at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! — Toдor Boжinov — 22:56, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
On 30 December 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Azerbaijani wine, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Azerbaijan region has been producing wine since the 2nd millennium BC and was noted by Herodotus, Strabo, Abu'l-Fida and Al-Muqaddasi? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Materialscientist ( talk) 02:04, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Happy New Year! (unless you specifically celebrate Nowruz) Hope you have a good one.-- Marshal Bagramyan ( talk) 02:21, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Let's discuss about Barda.Aram-van-- Aram-van ( talk) 07:55, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
Then let's talk!Aram-van-- Aram-van ( talk) 17:37, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Vandorenfm ( talk) 02:51, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose, at their own discretion, sanctions on any editor working on pages broadly related to Armenia- Azerbaijan and related conflicts if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2#Final decision. While I'm not necessarily implying you've yet risen to this level, I do see some edit warring and civility issues in your recent past (e.g., an accusation of purposeful misleading [17]). As such, this is a reminder to please pay attention to general civility and WP:BRD guidelines. Thanks. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 12:38, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
It isn't much relevant: you had the same warning above from a different administrator: #Sanctions. I'm simply asking that you can assume good faith, remain civil, and avoid edit warring. Thanks. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 14:17, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Could you explain why you are deleting citations on Articles relating to Azerbaijan?
I noticed your talk page has many complaints from several years on this subject -- please explain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rjbronn ( talk • contribs) 02:46, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
In enforcement and application of Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2#Amended Remedies and Enforcement, you are topic-banned from Armenia and Azerbaijan, including notably any conflicts with other countries or peoples, as defined at WP:TBAN. Your ban lasts for six months. The reasons for the ban are explained in this AE thread. Sandstein 10:53, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
Notice to administrators: In a March 2010 decision, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."
None that I know of - if there are enough alumni with articles I don't see why it can't be created, though. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa? Lo dicono a Signa. 22:05, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
Hello Tuscumbia and thanks for your work. Unfortunately, government photos are not in public domain in Georgia. Our principal source of the photos of Georgian officials is the public domain US government web-sites. Kober Talk 18:48, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi Tuscumbia, I've reviewed your DYK nomination but there is a problem. Could you take a look at T:TDYK#Borjomi (water)? Thanks SmartSE ( talk) 16:15, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
Sorry that it didn't fly. While there may have been other issues w/ article, its dispatch of the above from DYK was curious. While it may be have been speculation on Georgia's part, the refs do say that the Russian implementation of the ban was to assert itself, and was seen as a manipulation and/or punishment.
Seems like a missed opportunity to make DYK less USA-centric. It's a nice article. Djflem ( talk) 09:04, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tuscumbia for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 05:02, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Hello Tuscumbia. Sorry, apologizing for using your articles for reference and making you involved in the report. 21:23, 2 March 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dighapet ( talk • contribs)
Cool. Thank you, if I do smth wrong please tell me. Dighapet ( talk) 19:33, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi Tuscumbia. Done it! Keep up with great job you are doing. Thanks, -- Kober Talk 14:08, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | ||
I, Kober, hereby award you with this barnstar for your brilliant contributions to the Government of Georgia-related articles. Keep it up! Kober Talk 16:49, 30 March 2011 (UTC) |
Hi Tuscumbia. That's going to be rather a difficult task as the government of Georgia-operated websites have very scarce info on history of the respective agencies. I'll see what else I can do. Best regards,--
Kober
Talk 17:25, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
Please have a look at Talk:Tsitsernavank Monastery. I hope you can help to prevent endless and useless dispute with well sourced argumentation, as you are more knowledgeable on this issue and Wikipedia rules. Regards, -- Verman1 ( talk) 04:04, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
That was so long ago :) I have no problems with the recreation. -- User:Woohookitty Disamming fool! 19:41, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Wikipedia. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding "Motivation of Wikipedia contributors." I would like to invite you to a short survey. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates only ‘’’5 minutes’’’ cooldenny ( talk) 15:59, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
The article Borjomi (water) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Borjomi (water) for things which need to be addressed. Jezhotwells ( talk) 17:49, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
Hi Tuscumbia. Thanks for letting me know about your GA. The article reads great. I think I'll be able to make some humble contributions this weekend. Cheers, -- Kober Talk 03:47, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
Ack, sorry - forgot to get back to you. I looked it over, but honestly? I think you did just fine; I didn't need to add a thing. Thanks for the kind words, though - and apologies for the delayed response; I've been a bit woolly-brained of late. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa? Lo dicono a Signa. 20:32, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of The Bridge of Peace (Georgia) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Tzu Zha Men ( talk) 22:55, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
Hello Tuscumbia. Many thanks for the article. Best, -- Kober Talk 17:40, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
On 14 May 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Bridge of Peace (Georgia), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the bow-shaped pedestrian Bridge of Peace in Tbilisi over the Kura River, equipped with motion sensors, lights up the interior walkway in response to pedestrian movement? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Thank you Victuallers ( talk) 00:04, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
I wrote you something, please check your email.-- NovaSkola ( talk) 16:28, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
I've closed this as "speedy keep" because articles for deletion is only for "articles". If you wish this redirect to be deleted then you need to list it at redirects for discussion. -- Ron Ritzman ( talk) 00:48, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Welcome back from Wiki Project Terrorism! I'm Katarighe, a Wikipedian member since 2009. I'm currently the successor of Sherurcij in September because, he has not edited Wikipedia using this account for a considerable amount of time since May 2010. We are trying to renovate the new WP page this fall 2011 and we look forward this month whats next. If you are interested, start the renovation with us and new awards on contributing terrorism are coming soon. The WP terrorism newsletter begins January 2012. See you on October for the updates on WP terrorism. I will send this message next month about the updates. Good Luck.
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Terrorism at 22:43, 25 September 2011 (UTC).
Is this website Armeniapedia ? Birde insansız uçak konusu ayreten tartışılmalıdır. Tamamını silmeniz çok yanlış davranıştır. Milliyetçilik yapmadan faydalı bilgileri aktarmak bizim görevimizdir. Tarafsız Azeri kullanıcı hiç mi yok ? Kolay gelsin. Takabeg ( talk) 13:02, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello. You recently called me a "sockpuppet." Wikipedia is an ethical publication and such comments like "puppets" are unacceptable. I do not call you "dog" do I? Please behave. Szeget ( talk) 22:23, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
See here please. Thank you.-- Marshal Bagramyan ( talk) 01:52, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi tuscumbia, I've left a reply to your comment on my talk page. Regards Basalisk inspect damage⁄ berate 20:13, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Tuscumbia! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click
HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:42, 26 October 2011 (UTC) |
The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Karabakh". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 12 December 2011.
Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by
MediationBot (
talk) on
behalf of the Mediation Committee. 18:44, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
The request for formal mediation of the dispute concerning Karabakh, in which you were listed as a party, has been accepted by the Mediation Committee. The case will be assigned to an active mediator within two weeks, and mediation proceedings should begin shortly thereafter. Proceedings will begin at the case information page, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Karabakh, so please add this to your watchlist. Formal mediation is governed by the Mediation Committee and its Policy. The Policy, and especially the first two sections of the "Mediation" section, should be read if you have never participated in formal mediation. For a short guide to accepted cases, see the "Accepted requests" section of the Guide to formal mediation. You may also want to familiarise yourself with the internal Procedures of the Committee.
As mediation proceedings begin, be aware that formal mediation can only be successful if every participant approaches discussion in a professional and civil way, and is completely prepared to compromise. Please contact the Committee if anything is unclear.
For the Mediation Committee,
AGK
[•] 10:37, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
(Delivered by
MediationBot,
on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)
Hi. In Hamid bey Shahtakhtinski, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Zaqatala ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:06, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
[19] Winterbliss ( talk) 03:07, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
You've been calling me a sockpuppet for months, I think its only fair if I returned the favor. -- George Spurlin ( talk) 19:38, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Could you check the user Yerevanci who insists in changing the article Ermenikend to Armenikend? The user reverts the Redirect page to the article Ermenikend and reverts the text in the redirected Armenikend version, thus becoming a duplicate of the original Ermenikend article.
The name is Azerbaijani, and there is no justification and any credible arguement by this user to change it into the false spelling of Armenikend in the English language Wikipedia, especially using the corruption of the name from third languages (in this case Russian). I addressed this in the talk page of the article. I reverted them to the original state as well as reverted the internal wiki link to that article in the Armenians in Baku article. But the user still violates it.
Saguamundi ( talk) 02:35, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Persuant to the conversation at Talk:Murovdag and my repeated warnings to your there, your refusal to cease tendentious editing and statement of intent to continue doing so on the article and talk page, you are topic banned from articles related to Armenia and Azerbaijan, broadly construed including conflicts with any other countries or people across all talk pages and article spaces. Given your previous topic bans in this area, and your last ban having been six months, this ban will be in effect for one year. Violation of this ban will lead to blocks. -- WGFinley ( talk) 19:26, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
This situation reminds me very much of what happened to another user. The sock account managed to place an established user on a 1 year topic ban: [20] Note the complaint of the sock: The immediate concern is his editing of the article on Caucasian Albania, where User:Twilight Chill continues waging an edit war against 5 (five) other unrelated editors (Aram-van, Gorzaim, Vandorenfm, MarshallBagramyan, Xebulon). 4 of 5 accounts that he mentioned turned out later to be socks ( User:Aram-van, User:Gorzaim, User:Vandorenfm, and User:Xebulon). Yet the established user with tons of excellent contributions in various areas (not just AA) was placed on a 1 year topic ban, which he had served by now. The tactic of baiting the established users and placing them under sanctions works well. Grand master 22:06, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi ! How do you do ? Like to know what's your opinion about this comment on History of Azerbaijan . Thank you for your concern , -- Alborz Fallah ( talk) 09:13, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite Hello Tuscumbia. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released. Please click
HERE to participate. You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang DR goes to Wikimania! 00:28, 6 April 2012 (UTC) |
Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite Hello Tuscumbia. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released. Please click
HERE to participate. You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang DR goes to Wikimania! 00:29, 6 April 2012 (UTC) |
Hi,
I noticed you listed yourself as a participant of the Energy WikiProject.
There are 2 new outlines in this area that attempt to consolidate Wikipedia's coverage of their respective subjects, gathering and organizing the articles about them into one place and including descriptions for convenience. The purposes of these outlines are to make it easier for readers to survey or review a whole subject, and to choose from Wikipedia's many articles about it.
The new energy outlines are:
Please take a look at them, and....
For more information about the format and functions of outlines, see Wikipedia:Outlines.
Building outlines of existing material (such as Wikipedia) is called " reverse outlining". Reverse outlines are useful as a revision tool, for identifying gaps in coverage and for spotting poor structuring.
Revising a work with multiple articles (such as Wikipedia) is a little different than revising a paper. But the general principles are the same...
As you develop these outlines, you may notice things about the articles they organize. Like what topics are not adequately covered, better ways to structure and present the material, awkward titles, articles that need splitting, article sections lacking {{ Main}} links, etc.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Outlines.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
The Transhumanist 00:58, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
P.S.: see also
Outline of energy
Hi, Tuscumbia. You have been an active editor on Deepwater Horizon oil spill and/or its related articles. During some last months there has been an active development of cleaning up that article by splitting off large sections into separate articles. A Deepwater Horizon series were created (all the articles accessible by Template:Deepwater Horizon oil spill series. You are invited to assist by cleaning-up and copy-editing these articles. There are also ongoing discussion concerning additional split-offs. You could see split-off templates at the article's page and find discussions at the talk page. Your input would be useful for building consensus on these issues. Thank you. Beagel ( talk) 23:35, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
The article South Stream Serbia AG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Beagel (
talk) 18:51, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article OHS Consortium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OHS Consortium until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. evrifaessa ❯❯❯ talk 09:14, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
The article Misir Mardanov has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{ prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Liz Read! Talk! 20:08, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Vinagro, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. - Kevo327 ( talk) 17:27, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kamran Imanov, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kamran Imanov until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:04, 1 January 2024 (UTC)