This is an archive of past discussions with
Mono. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
current talk page.
Specifically, these come under criteria G8 for speedy deletion.--
Jeffro77 (
talk) 08:39, 21 July 2010 (UTC)reply
"No longer needed" is not a valid CSD rationale, especially when I have no clue "that these three pages are orphaned Talk pages of an article that was renamed
List of Watch Tower Society publications." Feel free to retag them under
G6 or
G8. —
mono 01:02, 22 July 2010 (UTC)reply
All tagged: {{db-g6|rationale=Main page moved along with archives; page no longer of any practical use.}} by me.
Airplaneman ✈ 04:25, 22 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Yes, I recognize that
User:Mikhailov_Kusserow's initial description in the request for deletion was of poor quality. Thanks.--
Jeffro77 (
talk) 11:03, 22 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Hi, I noticed you contested
User:babyox4420's article titled
Talk:Storm Team 2 Weather App, which was added to the main WGRZ page in July 2010. I have to question the reasons where you believe the information was not from reliable sources. Sorry if I sound a little blunt, but would you not consider the actual tv station WGRZ and their website wgrz.com a reliable source?
I have included additional links to help show multiple reliable sources:
WGRZ announces the Storm Team 2 Weather App:
[1] (includes promotional video)
WGRZ Storm Team 2 App on iTunes:
[2]
WSI Corporation (creator of Storm Team 2 App):
[3]
Gannett Corporation selects WSI as HD weather provider (WGRZ's parent company):
[4]
I hope this clarifies any confusion there may have been with the article. Overall, the Storm Team 2 Weather App is an extension of the Storm Team 2 brand that WGRZ uses for its weather forecasts, and if deleted, would detract from the quality of the article. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Babyox4420 (
talk •
contribs) 22:32, 22 July 2010 (UTC)reply
I am not questioning that
it exists. I have nominated the article for deletion, because it is not notable (it has not recieved significant coverage in
reliable sources). Wikipedia covers notable topics—those that have been "noticed" to a significant degree by reliable sources. A topic is deemed appropriate for inclusion if it complies with WP:NOT and has received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. —
mono 00:08, 23 July 2010 (UTC)reply
In this case if additional sourcing can't be found, would you propose making it part of the main article itself? The only concern some may have in this case is that some would suggest splitting it. I did want to ask what would you define as "reliable sources?" Third party site such as a mobile apps site? Google news? There can be some gray area there based on the link you listed with reliable sources. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Babyox4420 (
talk •
contribs) 00:18, 23 July 2010 (UTC)reply
To be frank, the one-sentence mention in
WGRZ is already more than enough, and I can't see any split proposal passing any time in the near future, in which case the article may be recreated. As of now, the app is not notable on its own. See my comments in the AfD. It would be advisable to fix up the article on the TV station itself, as well.
Airplaneman ✈ 00:36, 23 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Looks pretty good. —
mono 23:59, 22 July 2010 (UTC)reply
MOTD Barnstar
The MOTD Barnstar
This award is given to you for helping out
Motto of the day. Thanks to your effort,
MOTD has brilliantly and successfully passed the most difficult period of the year. In fact, there are mottoes scheduled until the end of the summer. For this reason MOTD would like to express heartfelt thanks to you for your support. We appreciate your efforts in further helping the project! – delivered by
Simply south on behalf of Wikipedia:Motto of the day 23:04, 22 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Just wanted to take a look, however there's no need to keep it around. —
mono 01:15, 23 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Delivery Successful
{{
User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}
Hello, this is an automated message to inform you that your message delivery request (Test) was completed successfully. Happy editing!
{{
User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}
Hey Mono! I just wanted to tell you that the bot to deliver messages that you asked me about on my talk page has been approved for a trial, and if you would like to request a message delivery for its testing you can follow the instructions on
its user page. Happy editing! -
EdoDodotalk 07:08, 21 July 2010 (UTC)reply
great! iMay test it out with myself soon. —
mono 01:05, 22 July 2010 (UTC)reply
That would be awesome, could use something to deliver for its test run. Feel free to submit a delivery request any time :). -
EdoDodotalk 16:37, 22 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Sorry, I do have a job for it, but I can't login with my TUSC account. Error message: "You are not authorized to log in, please request approval from one of the admins (see here for more information)." Could you approve me? —
mono 00:37, 23 July 2010 (UTC)reply
You don't have to login to submit a request, that's only for regular users who are trusted and have their requests automatically verified. Anyway, I've approved you. -
EdoDodotalk 07:40, 23 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Notify me if you want changes, as that can be done very quickly and easily. Oh, speak of the Devil, it's from Percy Jackson. I was roaming around your userspace for ideas and I saw the Percy Jackson Task Force, so I looked up some witty quotes from percy jackson.
Belugaboyhow's my driving? 01:03, 27 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Belugaboy seems to have forgotten something. :) There is a section in the request for you to rate the motto, on a scale from 1-5. Please do that, if you have time. :) ~~
Hi878(Come shout at me!) 01:23, 27 July 2010 (UTC)reply
{{
User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}
I do nothing about the signpost except reading it, so I was wondering if MOTD's recent changes could be covered in the signpost. I know it's not very notable but... Kayau VotingISevil 07:07, 27 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Does it fit the scope of the signpost and if it does, are the chances high that MOTD's changes will be covered? Kayau VotingISevil 14:20, 28 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Thanks for uploading File:Pandora Mobile For iPhone App Screenshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
I am a
bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click
here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off
here and leave a message on
my owner's talk page.
FYI, I've re-added the image to the article. It was removed by an anonymous user without any explanation as to why they removed it. ~
SuperHamsterTalkContribs 16:46, 28 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Mono, Belugaboy forgot to add the → for his quote when he delivered it. If you wouldn't mind, this template has it, so if you could switch the one you have for this one, that would be great. Thanks. ~~
Hi878(Come shout at me!) 16:57, 28 July 2010 (UTC)reply
So, fix it. You ought to train your volunteers better... —
mono 00:13, 29 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Yes, apparently he didn't see the instructions at the top of the page with a bold header... Oh well. :) The reason I asked you to was because I didn't know if you had it anywhere other than this page. Do you? ~~
Hi878(Come shout at me!) 00:16, 29 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Okay, did it on this page. If you have it anywhere else, you can swap it. :) By the way, at the top of the page, you have hidden text that you can only see when editing the page, and it tells you to look at [[User talk:Mono|THIS PAGE]] which you would obviously already be seeing. :) ~~
Hi878(Come shout at me!) 00:22, 29 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Mono, please explain why you g6-ed it. I'd like to know. Thanks,
Airplaneman ✈ 04:57, 28 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Uncontroversial deletion (qualifying under G6); page should be at
Magic Trackpad (do we call it the
Apple Mac Book Pro?). G6 used to perform a "uncontroversial page move." Cheers, —
mono 00:12, 29 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Ah, OK. See the
decline rationale. Also, my edit summary specifically stated "moved Magic Trackpad to Apple Magic Trackpad: looks like the current trend; see
Apple Magic Mouse, for example". Next time, please leave rationale or even ask me. I might even have g7ed it myself. So yea, take a look at
WP:RM, and consider adding "
Apple Magic Mouse" and "
Apple Wireless Keyboard" to the mix. So yea, the main point is that g6 tags should ideally contain an explanation.
Airplaneman ✈ 00:51, 29 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Sandbox header
{{
User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}}
Sorry, I never even noticed that (which is weird, because scrolling through its edit history showed that it was there for some time, at least when I last visited it). But why is that header there? What's the difference if users are constantly changing it and the box is automatically cleaned every 12 hours anyway?
Nightscream (
talk) 01:51, 29 July 2010 (UTC)reply
I don't know. Likely someone thought we ought to have a banner (another one!) and created a warning for it ({{uw-sandbox}}) (why?!?!?)... Every time a user removes the banner (like you did, usually on accident) the bot resets it, so no harm done. Just thought you should know. —
mono 01:54, 29 July 2010 (UTC)reply
I was wondering whether I would be able to take up your offer for adoption on Wikipedia. I would very much look forward to it, I have learnt a lot of Wikipedia, having been a member for a month or so but still have a lot to learn. I feel that you are very experienced, and I was looking for an admin aswell and I though that you were very good and that I would learn a lot under you. I hope you accept my request to you.
Hmmm... I don't exactly remember offering you adoption; but I'm willing to help out. Note that I have a little different style than some: please understand that I do not have concrete plans for you and I won't follow you around unless you ask me about something that's going on. I will be available to discuss the project with you whenever you want, however, if this doesn't sound like you, you'll be much happier with a different mentor. —
mono 23:50, 29 July 2010 (UTC)reply
I am withdrawing my adoption request to you.Thank you very much. Kind Regards,
--HelpingHandTalk 11:35, 30 July 2010 (UTC)reply
File:Vol cover.jpg
Please tell me if I have corrected the issue you pointed as your reasoning for deletion. I hope I have satisfied your desires for Wikipedia. I used another album's cover art as a reference on how to do this. Any help is appreciated! --
Volbeatfan (
talk) 04:24, 30 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Sorry, quite busy. Should be done soon. —
mono 00:13, 31 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Oops - I didn't notice you'd marked this one taken, just saw it was stale, so by the time I saw that, I'd done and uploaded it - I am very sorry if you were working on it. My apologies
Begoontalk 15:09, 31 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Since you are the coordinator for the Apple Inc. Wiki Project Group, I figured I should just communicate with you directly instead of posting messages on 21 Apple related Talk pages.
I was curious if I could enlist the help of either yourself or other editors from the Apple Inc. Wiki Project team. I have a
conflict of interest of posting about Apple products since I am employed by
iFixit. I want to be able to provide quality content to multiple Apple product articles on Wikipedia, but I would be contributing from a biased point of view.
If you, or another editor from the wiki project team, could please check out my user page, all of the information and reasonings of mine are posted there.
Unfortunately, as far as I can tell, iFixit doesn't appear to be reliable (no offense; reliable=peer reviewed and stuff), which leads me to believe that the addition of external links would not benefit the quality of the article (If the link is relevant, helpful and informative, it should be included). As I'm not familiar with the product/service, (maybe it is reliable) I can't exactly determine where these might be appropriate. I know you'll find a good deal of similar sites in external links sections, however, these sites really aren't helpful and shouldn't be there. You mentioned that the site was referenced in WP articles already, and this basically shows that the user who added it had to "
crowdsource" from a "knowledge wiki". —
mono 00:43, 31 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Thank you for the quick response. In terms of reliability (peer review etc*) iFixit is not always 100% accurate in its content, since it is both contributed by community members and employees with both parties providing varying levels of quality consistency. iFixit's content goes through a peer screening process before a guide can actually be viewed by all visitors to the website. However, I only provided a list of iFixit repair manuals that were of a high enough quality to be worth linking to from a Wikipedia article. Since you are not familiar with our content, would you be able to pose my request to the rest of the Apple Wiki Project team? I am sure that someone in the project team has heard of iFixit and would be able to determine if my suggestions are valid.
I am not attempting to promote any products that iFixit sells (replacement parts and tools). I am merely trying to share the content/knowlede that iFixit provides at no cost. If a Wikipedia editor finds a source that has easier to follow instructions, better quality images, and less paid ads on a website, I would have no qualms with them choosing to not link to iFixit repair manuals. I just feel that it is important for Wikipedia readers to have access to knowledge about how to repair the electronic device they are reading about. I would greatly appreciate your thoughts on this subject.
Hello,
I am a Wikipedian who has not been making regular contributions to Wikipedia, lately, and would like to return. I was previously involved with Wikipedia's Adoption Program, and was adopted by A Nobody, who has since been permanently banned form Wikipedia.
I have left a message on another Wikipedian's talk page about whether or not the adoption program was still in affect, and asked about getting some guidance help. The Wikipedian was involved in getting A Nobody banned, which I know nothing about. Sadly, the Wikipedian could not find it in his busy schedule to reply to my message.
The user who left this question did not sign it. Please sign all talk page messages with a
signature (~~~~)
The adoption program is still up and running (I am adopting users on a case by case basis; see
User_talk:Mono/Archive_15#Request_for_adoption).You can find information at
Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User/Adoptee's Area. Additionally, remember to "sign" your posts with four tildes (~~~~), which will produce your username and a link to your userpage. —
mono 19:10, 31 July 2010 (UTC)reply
WikiCup 2010 July newsletter
We are half-way through our penultimate round, and nothing is yet certain. Pool A, currently led by Sasata (
submissions) has ended up the more competitive, with three contestants (Sasata (
submissions), Sturmvogel_66 (
submissions) and TonyTheTiger (
submissions)) scoring over 500 points already. Pool B is led by Casliber (
submissions), who has also scored well over 500. The top two from each pool, as well as the next four highest scorers regardless of pool, will make it through to our final eight. As ever, anything you worry may not receive the necessary attention before the end of the round (such as outstanding GA or FA nominations) is welcome at
Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews, and please remember to continue offering reviews yourself where possible. As always, the judges are available to contact via email, IRC or their talk pages, and general discussion about the Cup is welcome on the
WikiCup talk page.
Planning has begun for the 2011 WikiCup, with open discussions concerning
scoring and
flags for next year's competition. Contributions to those discussions would be appreciated, especially concerning the flags, as next year's signups cannot begin until the flag issue has been resolved. Signups will hopefully open at some point in this round, with discussion about possible changing in the scoring/process opening some time afterwards.
Earlier this round, we said goodbye to Hunter Kahn (
submissions), who has bowed out to spend more time on the book he is authoring with his wife. We wish him all the best. In other news, the start of this round also saw some WikiCup awards sent out by Suomi Finland 2009 (
submissions). We appreciate his enthusiasm, and contestants are of course welcome to award each other prizes as they see fit, but rest assured that we will be sending out "official" awards at the end of the competition. If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from
Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.
J Milburn,
Fox and
The ed17 22:40, 31 July 2010 (UTC)reply
Greetings from the Guild of Copy EditorsJuly 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive. Thanks to all who participated in the drive! Over 100 editors—including
Jimbo Wales—signed up this time (nearly triple the participants of the May drive). This benefited the Guild as well as the articles in need of copy editing. You can see from the comparison graphs that we increased the number of completed copyedits substantially. Unfortunately, we were not able to meet our goal of completely wiping out 2008 from the queue. We also were not able to reduce the backlog to less than 6,000 articles. We suspect people were busy with real life summertime things, at least in the northern hemisphere! We were able to remove the months of January, February, March, April, and May from the backlog, and we almost wiped out the month of June. We reduced the backlog by 1,289 articles (17%), so all in all it was a very successful drive, and we will be holding another event soon. We'll come up with some new ideas to try to keep things fresh and interesting. Keep up the good work, everybody!
Stats
If you copy edited at least 4,000 words, you qualify for a barnstar. If you edited in the May 2010 GOCE Backlog Elimination Drive, your word totals are cumulative for barnstars (not the leaderboard). Over the course of the next week or two, we will be handing out the barnstars.
Eight people will receive The Most Excellent Order of the Caretaker's Barnstar (100,000+ words): Chaosdruid, Diannaa, Ericleb01, Lfstevens, Shimeru, S Masters, The Utahraptor, and Torchiest.
Bullock and Slon02 will receive The Order of the Superior Scribe (80,000+).
The Barnstar of Diligence (60,000+) goes to Derild4921, GaryColemanFan, kojozone, and Mlpearc.
The Modern Guild of Copy Editors Barnstar (40,000+) goes to A. Parrot, AirplanePro, Auntieruth55, Bejinhan, David Rush, and mono.
Nobody will receive The Old School League of Copy Editors award (30,000+).
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar (20,000+) goes to Backtable, Cindamuse, dtgriffith, Duff, e. ripley, Laurinavicius, NerdyScienceDude, and TEK.
The Cleanup Barnstar (12,000+) goes to Brickie, Casliber, cymru lass, December21st2012Freak, Nolelover, TheTito, Whoosit, and YellowMonkey.
The Working Man's Barnstar (8,000+) goes to Bsherr, Duchess of Bathwick, HELLKNOWZ, Mabeenot, noraft, Pyfan, and Richard asr.
The Modest Barnstar (4,000+) goes to Adrian J. Hunter, Airplaneman, Annalise, Camerafiend, Cricket02, Fetchcomms, Gosox5555, LeonidasSpartan, Paulmnguyen, Piotrus, SuperHamster, Taelus, and TPW.
I am testing some new features for MessageDeliveryBot, so I put your request on hold for the moment, while I work on it. -
EdoDodotalk 19:08, 1 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Redirect?
Would you mind redirecting
User talk:Mono/userpage to this talk page? It would be easier to navigate since that page is your actual userpage and it would make sense for the talk page to be your actual talk page. Thanks!
Derild4921☼ 12:42, 2 August 2010 (UTC)reply
is full of overlapping templates for me. I use IE8 on the monobook skin. Just telling you so you can fix it. Thanks,
Access Denied(
t|
c|
g|
d|
s) 21:15, 3 August 2010 (UTC)reply
I think that's the point. —
fetch·comms 23:36, 3 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Removing redlinks is NOT vandalism. Kindly revert your edit to the article and remove the warning from my talk page.
69.181.249.92 (
talk) 05:10, 4 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Unexplained section blanking is vandalism.
drippingflame 05:14, 4 August 2010 (UTC)reply
69 explained it in his edit summaries; he was removing red links. Clearly NOT vandalism since the article in question says it is only a list of those with existing biographical articles on wikipedia. Therefore the redlinks are out of place until such time as they have articles of their own.
Millahnna (mouse)talk 05:34, 4 August 2010 (UTC)reply
If you look at the actual diff (
[5]), actual entries were removed, not just the links. By the way, redlinks help Wikipedia grow, (see
study) and should only be removed if there is no way that an article might exist. Please take
common sense into consideration when applying policy, however, the explanation provided in the edit summaries does not explain the actual reason for removing the entries.
drippingflame 16:36, 4 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Actually if you look at that very same diff, no real entries were removed. Everything removed was either a red link or borked attempt at an addition (all of which also don't have existing articles). And per the article in question, "The following are prominent Muslim Rajputs with existing biographical articles on Wikipedia." I'm very aware that red links help wiki grow but when they run contrary to the information on the page, I don't see how they are helpful. Different interpretations I suppose; but still, hardly vandalism. Regards and happy editing.
Millahnna (mouse)talk 16:55, 4 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Is this why you put a talkback on my page? I have nothing to add. Millahnna has very nicely summed up my reasoning, and the fallacy of yours.
69.181.249.92 (
talk) 01:55, 5 August 2010 (UTC)reply
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
For your hilarious, but minor Igloo hiccup. (I am using Huggle which is probably 100 times more buggy.) elektrikSHOOS 03:09, 5 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Quick on the rollback, though...
drippingflame 03:11, 5 August 2010 (UTC)reply
What the heck? This is getting fishy.
drippingflame 05:15, 5 August 2010 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
WikiProject Apple Inc. August 2010 Newsletter
The iNewsletter/issue 1/august 2010/by
mono &
dwayne
Project news
After several months of collaboration on
Macintosh, the article was delisted from featured article status.
Last month, WikiProject Apple Inc. quietly launched several new departments (
collaboration,
outreach and
strategy). A new program by the
outreach department is preparing to launch a recruiting effort (
ORDER).
The collaboration on
Macintosh has ended, and
Apple Inc. will be the next project, after a discussion at the project forums. The project's goal is to promote the article to
good-article status.
Hello, this is an automated message to inform you that some errors were encountered while processing your delivery request (WikiProject Apple Inc. August 2010 Newsletter). Please deliver the messages to the following users manually, if you wish, because the bot was not allowed to do so:
Hmm... Seems that user was renamed, perhaps the bot should follow the redirect instead of outputting an error message. Might change its behavior. -
EdoDodotalk 01:56, 6 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Apologies for the bot spam on your talk page, I was doing some testing with your request. -
EdoDodotalk 10:53, 6 August 2010 (UTC)reply
How long does an article have to be to meet the GA criteria? This particular article seems really short, and yet it's a GA nominee.
:| TelCoNaSpVe :| 23:06, 6 August 2010 (UTC)reply
(
talk page stalker) An article do not have to be very long for
GA as long as "it addresses the main aspects of the topic" ("This requirement is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required of featured articles; it allows shorter articles, articles that do not cover every major fact or detail, and overviews of large topics."), according to the
good article criteria. -
EdoDodotalk 23:15, 6 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Umm...
About
this, Mono(mium). Stuff like this makes you (at least the online version of you) and some of your actions seem ornery and/or attention-seeking. I would go as far to say that this is one of the main reasons you don't always get along well with users here. The least you could do is say something about it on your talk page and/or talk page edit notice (maybe using
the template you linked to; that way people will know). I'll post here instead of your editor review to get your attention, as this is something you could improve.
Airplaneman ✈ 02:51, 7 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Of course talkbacks are meant to and can be removed; what I didn't take a liking to was the apparently snarky comments. There's no need for those. Thanks for clarifying.
Airplaneman ✈ 03:50, 7 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Still having trouble using Gloo without falsely accusing others, I see.
[6][7]69.181.249.92 (
talk) 02:58, 7 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Reverted seconds after, then tagged as
WP:G7. Revert rationale was "speedy deletion template removed", so I reverted the edit, then realizing that it should be G7ed. A self-revert tool is coming, however, you'll see this with plenty of automatic programs.
Ⓢock 03:10, 7 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Mono, are you good with some of the computer lingo? Perhaps you could help with OS/360 and successors and how to incorporate the other articles into this single one.
:| TelCoNaSpVe :| 06:27, 7 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Not really. Stalkers?
ʄlame 17:22, 7 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Hello Bk314159, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of
List of Online Games for Kids, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: list (A3 doesn't apply); try PROD. You may wish to review the
Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you.
drippingflame 02:33, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
I believed that criterion A3 did apply because the page consisted exclusively of a collection of external links. Although there was no section explicitly titled "External links" (or similar), it did still consist of only external links, and was thus eligible for A3.
Bk314159 (
talk) 13:16, 7 August 2010 (UTC)reply
It was a list, which would be a collection of links, therefore, we use
common sense and fix it. Some of the external links in the "list" have actual artices. Regards,
ʄlame 17:22, 7 August 2010 (UTC)reply
For the record, the deletion rationale was "A3 *does* apply to lists that consist exclusively of a directory of external links with no linking content." Lists aren't always just collections of links. See, for example,
List of Percy Jackson & the Olympians characters.
Airplaneman ✈ 19:47, 7 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Fix what? I would hate for the PJ list to be a bunch of links. It may as well be a category, then. Another tip I'll put here instead of your editor review: work on your replies, which can be so curt that I can't understand what you're trying to say. Wikipedians are "cursed", shall I say, to communicate in text, so you have to be extra-clear.
Airplaneman ✈ 17:33, 8 August 2010 (UTC)reply
I felt, due to the fact that some items on the list of links had articles, that the list had potential. Instead of quickly tagging it, the "tagger" should consider whether the list might actually be worthwhile. Instead of "suggesting" it should be fixed with a CSD tag, why not
fix it?
Ⓢock 17:39, 8 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Oh, I see :). I don't think a list of online games for kids would be suitable on Wikipedia for a variety of reasons, though. For instance, what is a kid game? What is not? There are thousands of them. A category would be better, IMO. Thanks for clarifying.
Airplaneman ✈ 18:37, 8 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Macintosh is a GA
Just to let you know, I reviewed Macintosh against GA criteria, and I marked it as a GA for I believe that it meets the GA criteria. Usb10Let's talk 'bout it! 15:05, 8 August 2010 (UTC)reply
We need good editors-I've seen this same discouraged tag on four friends recently, cheer up, don't let them get you down.--
Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (
talk) 07:18, 9 August 2010 (UTC)reply
A break is always nice though. Maybe you just need to set a goal, and work for that one thing instead of bothering with any other stuff (like AfDs or whatnot). —
fetch·comms 17:48, 9 August 2010 (UTC)reply
I second the two statements above. I find that some good old article work and a few successful GA noms really give you some motivation. Maybe a
MacBook Air GAN?
Airplaneman ✈ 21:33, 9 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Yeah, I think I'll finish that up soon...
ℳono 23:22, 9 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Good to see you back at the Signpost. I think
Rock drum also showed an interest in doing a Report for August 13, so you may want to let him know you've taken that spot. Also, how come you're deleting our interview spaces? -
Mabeenot (
talk) 08:27, 10 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Glad to be back. After the drama and some rl messes, I decided to take a break. August 13? (the next Signpost publishes August 16). Finally, I thought it might be good to clean them up every so often.
ℳono 17:50, 10 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Oops... I meant September 13. -
Mabeenot (
talk) 04:38, 11 August 2010 (UTC)reply
I bumped it up to Aug 30. Also, what do you think of a report on
WPAFC?
ℳono 04:42, 11 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Next Report
I may not have a reliable connection to the internet this weekend. If I have not already started the Report on WP NASCAR by Sunday, could you move the interview from
here to the article for me? I'd be very grateful for your help. -
Mabeenot (
talk) 04:31, 12 August 2010 (UTC)reply
I may not have a reliable connection either, so I'll just post a note at the newsroom.
ℳono 04:50, 12 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Christmas motto series
Hi! As a contributor to the MOTD, I thought I would draw your attention to a discussion for a
possible Christmas Motto series. If you get a chance, could you please pop in and give your thoughts? Thanks! Stephen!Coming... 15:50, 12 August 2010 (UTC)reply
I'll peek in.
ℳono 23:35, 12 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Hey
Do you really think he deserves his own article? I did that so an actual wikipedian would take notice and delete the article. Anyway the previous version seemed to have been written by an autistic 13-year-old and was not at all encyclopedic. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
189.247.6.82 (
talk) 21:17, 11 August 2010 (UTC)reply
I have tagged it for deletion. Blanking the page does nothing, so you know. Additionally, do not call people "autistic 13-year-olds", as that is a violation of
the "no personal attacks" policy. Comment on content, not editors. Finally, please sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~). Thank you.
ℳono 21:21, 11 August 2010 (UTC)reply
"Autistic" is not inherently a personal attack. —
fetch·comms 21:28, 11 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Well,yes. However, it certainly not civil and
AGFy...
ℳono 21:32, 11 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Ok, done. I am a "Wikipedian". Thanks. --
RRV56 (
talk) 22:08, 11 August 2010 (UTC)reply
(
talk page stalker) Dripping Flame is Mono's anti-vandal account that is powered by
igloo. ~
NSD (
✉ •
✐) 22:11, 11 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Why, welcome! Yes, it is botish, but I click the button.
ℳono 22:13, 11 August 2010 (UTC)reply
By the way, your new signature uses <big> tags, which is discouraged per
WP:SIG. ~
NSD (
✉ •
✐) 22:18, 11 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Meh. You were the one who copied it (
illegally). @RRV56: may I recommend
adoption?
ℳono 22:21, 11 August 2010 (UTC)reply
My signature doesn't have big tags in it though, and it doesn't use the same font or color scheme. It also doesn't have a shadow effect. ~
NSD (
✉ •
✐) 23:16, 11 August 2010 (UTC)reply
It is clearly a derivative. Also, the gray border is the same...
ℳono 02:04, 12 August 2010 (UTC)reply
iAgree with mono. Personally, NSD, I liked your older sig better. It was less dark. Mono, don't use <big> tags, as iAgree with NSD on that one :). May I suggest <span style="color: asdfads;size= asdfadsf"> as an alternative
?
Airplaneman ✈ 04:00, 12 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Heh; I'm sure there's no color called "asdfads" :). I was suggesting that the span style tag replace the current big tags in mono's sig.
Airplaneman ✈ 17:00, 12 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Use of the <big> tag isn't what matters. The point of the guideline is that the sig should not be abnormally tall or large. I would say Mono's sig is borderline on that issue, but probably OK. However, the guideline also says that sigs should not be "distracting", a criteria I would definitely say is breached by Mono's current sig, but I suppose it is a matter of opinion.
Kaldari (
talk) 21:01, 12 August 2010 (UTC)reply
You can turn it off by adding .msig {display: none;} to
this page.
ℳono 23:44, 12 August 2010 (UTC)reply
It's not about us, but about the community. Denying your signature for our viewing pleasure only isn't going to fix it. I really don't have a problem with your current sig. Kaldari was just pointing a few things out. So yea...
Airplaneman ✈ 23:50, 12 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Alright; sorry for bugging you.
Airplaneman ✈ 00:52, 13 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Back to adoption
Hey, Mono. Sorry for not replying, guess I thought we two were done here (specially considering all the people who started typing here). Sure you can adopt me! --
RRV56 (
talk) 23:29, 12 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Heh... I wasn't really offering to adopt you myself, but of course I'd be willing to help you. I have a little different style than some of the adopters here. Please understand that I do not have concrete plans for you, although I have some activities, if you're interested. I won't follow you around much, unless you ask me about something that's going on; I will be available to discuss the project with you whenever you want (and whenever my schedule permits). If this doesn't sound like you, you'll be much happier with a different mentor.
ℳono 23:44, 12 August 2010 (UTC)reply
No, that's alright. The only problem I see is my tight schedule, I won't be able to spend that much time in Wikiepedia, though I'd be happy to expand articles whenever I have the time. --
RRV56 (
talk) 15:10, 13 August 2010 (UTC)reply
I've noticed that your vector file of
File:525 BfSB.png is particularly large - 2MB - is there any chance of a retrace (perhaps a proper one?) Thanks. Connormah 20:07, 13 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Delivery Successful
Hello, this is an automated message to inform you that your message delivery request (Welcome!) was completed successfully. Happy editing!
Which of my edits did you object to, the capitalization of her last name or the placing of categories on her page? You would be much better at attacking vandalism if you actually read the edits you are reverting. Please take a few seconds to pay attention to what you are doing in the future.
Kinston eagle (
talk) 01:40, 15 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Sorry, I thought that you were removing the categories, instead of adding them. My mistake.
ʄlame 01:43, 15 August 2010 (UTC)reply
You reverted less than a minute after my edit so it's not surprising that you would make a stupid mistake. Please be more cautious in the future and take a few moments to examine what you are doing.
Kinston eagle (
talk) 01:47, 15 August 2010 (UTC)reply
I was using a semi-automated program, so most reverts a performed within a few seconds.
ℳono 02:16, 15 August 2010 (UTC)reply
User page
Per your editnotice, I just wanted to let you know that I made a change to your user page. In
this edit, I made the M smaller so the talk page link worked. Before it would cover part of the link in a way that it wouldn't work. You are welcome to undo the edit if you don't like it, though there would still be a technical issue if the edit was undone. ~
NSD (
✉ •
✐) 15:29, 15 August 2010 (UTC)reply
TeleComNasSprVen has given you a
cookie! Cookies promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{
subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{
subst:munch}}!
I am concerned with some possible
copyright violations in this article, which remain from the time that you created the page.
For instance, the section now entitled "Contest (U.S.)" seems to be a verbatim copy of the website.
I also note that the text in "Prizes" appears on various websites that predate the article creation, e.g.
webpronews.
Therefore, please could you check the article and remove any material that is a copyright infringement. Thanks, Chzz ► 05:43, 16 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Hello Mono. You seem active at the
Graphic Lab, so I wanted to invite you to participate in
The Signpost's interview of the project. The report is being written by
Rock drum and will be published September 13; this is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Please stop by and answer some interview questions
here. Thank you,
�ono
Hello, this is an automated message to inform you that some errors were encountered while processing your delivery request (Graphic Lab interview at The Signpost). Please deliver the messages to the following users manually, if you wish, because the bot was not allowed to do so:
Hello Mono,
Airplaneman ✈ has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the
WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing!
Airplaneman ✈ 03:23, 17 August 2010 (UTC)reply Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Now that I'm online and settled, is there any chance I can add a couple replies to the interview for WP:Univ? I noticed you've closed it to further comments, but I'd still like to participate if possible. -
Mabeenot (
talk) 15:00, 17 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Go ahead! I'm OK with that. :)
ʄlame 23:04, 17 August 2010 (UTC)reply
I told ya i wasn't gonna forget ;)
Happy Birthday!
Have a very happy birthday on your special day! Best wishes, -
Dwayne was here!
♫ (05:03, 18 August 2010 (UTC))reply
Instead of making a new section, I'll just post it here: Happy birthday! ~
SuperHamsterTalkContribs 05:06, 18 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Happy Birthday - but I want to know something, how did you manage to fit in 14049 edits in 1 year! It puts me to shame.
WVRMAD•
Talk •
Guestbook 11:03, 18 August 2010 (UTC)reply
All the best on your special day! Cheers, --
Diannaa(
Talk) 03:04, 19 August 2010 (UTC)reply
Thanks from the GOCE
Thank you very much for signing up for the
Guild of Copy Editors'
September Backlog Elimination Drive! The copyedit backlog stretches back two years, to the summer of 2008! We're going to need all the help we can muster to reduce the backlog to a manageable size. We've set a goal of clearing all of 2008 from the backlog, and getting the total under 5000. To do that, we're going to need more participants. Please invite anyone you can to join the drive! Once again, thanks for your support! If you have any questions, contact one of our coordinators—
ɳorɑfʈ Talk!,
The RaptorYou rang?, or
SMasters (
Talk).
I've done your requests at
WP:GL/ILL for the CVU Awards. Let me know if I can modify them in any way to improve them. Connormah 04:01, 21 August 2010 (UTC)reply
RE:Help
Because i do not know how to undo multiple edits. I tried undoing the only edit that really removed the roster, but it said cannot be done.Candyo32 00:22, 12 September 2010 (UTC)reply
You can use a script like
Twinkle or apply for
rollback at
WP:PERM/R if you wish to do it yourself.
ℳono 03:42, 12 September 2010 (UTC)reply
I have rollback. Candyo32 07:32, 12 September 2010 (UTC)reply
(
talk page stalker) You can get
Twinkle(instructions are there) then - it will add a brown restore this version above
diffs which, when clicked, will undo all the edits that follow it, restoring the page to that version. ~QwerpQwertusTalk ツ 03:17, 13 September 2010 (UTC)reply
RFA
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Resolved
– Not now, but thank you
I'd like to nominate you for adminship, but I thought I'd check with you first per
WP:RFA/N. —
Waterfox(
talk) 22:47, 12 September 2010 (UTC)reply
I've responded by email.
ℳono 22:53, 12 September 2010 (UTC)reply
Mono, I would recommend not going for adminship at this time. You have had a lot of issues in the past few months. Maybe in the future, but not now. ~NerdyScienceDude 23:17, 12 September 2010 (UTC)reply
If you don't take it personally, it can't hurt, really. You don't have to pass on your first attempt! I'm sure many users will drop by and offer support and/or good advice (others won't…), and most RFA questions are thought-provoking and may teach you something in the process. Either way, I'm indifferent as to wether you run in the near future or later. ;)
Airplaneman ✈ 00:10, 13 September 2010 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Is there any chance we could move your WP Volcanoes interview up to September 27 (a couple weeks from now)? You seem to have collected plenty of answers already and nobody else has shown interest in doing an article for the 27th. -
Mabeenot (
talk) 00:18, 15 September 2010 (UTC)reply
{{Resolved}}
Hello, I'm notifying you that a user has
request the article
Mark Heaney, which you
proposed for deletion, to be restored. If you believe the subject still does not meet the notability requirements, please nominate the article at
WP:AFD. Thank you. —
ξxplicit 17:54, 17 September 2010 (UTC)reply
{{Resolved}}
Not sure that collapsing it by default is the best idea, as that slows down the review process. What exactly was the issue with the noncollapsed version? /
ƒETCHCOMMS/ 02:37, 20 September 2010 (UTC)reply
BRD; trying to clean things up and rm distractions to newbies. Interesting sig...
Aaargh 02:38, 20 September 2010 (UTC)reply
Yes, but it's now more difficult for reviewers (and users, when they try to see how to improve their article). Can you make it uncollapsed by default? /
ƒETCHCOMMS/ 02:45, 20 September 2010 (UTC)reply