Hello Manchurian candidate! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (Manchurian candidate) is used to identify you instead. In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! - theWOLFchild 20:55, 26 December 2017 (UTC) reply Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Global warming on other planets page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -- 172.165.169.16 18:42, 2 February 2007 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:NAU.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:15, 4 February 2007 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on 2009 Lok Sabha elections, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{ hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Tikiwont 10:25, 19 February 2007 (UTC) reply

Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as 2007 invasion of Iran) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Seinfreak37 17:41, 20 February 2007 (UTC) reply

Note that we already have Plans for strikes against the Iranian nuclear program. In the event that someone invades Iran, this page will likely become the article on the invasion. Hut 8.5 17:43, 20 February 2007 (UTC) reply

Great link! It makes an excellent addition to the article. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 14:22, 1 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia by creating the page Global warming happening on other planets. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. (aeropagitica) 16:21, 6 April 2007 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Global warming on other planets, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{ hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Greatestrowerever 13:27, 8 April 2007 (UTC) reply

I am deleting the article, coz it does not provide any info whatsoever at the moment. When you or your friends get the time to coalesce information from the links, please recreate the article back then only. Thanks.

In case you need the links, I am putting them here:

• http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2006/12/17/222712/69
• http://www.channel4.com/science/microsites/U/ukweather2080/guides/planets.html
• http://motls.blogspot.com/2006/05/global-warming-on-jupiter.html
• http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2002/pluto.html
• http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=192
• http://news.yahoo.com/s/space/20070404/sc_space/duststormsfuelglobalwarmingonmars;_ylt=AiVxN.mGF7G8fZ3EHMojv.3MWM0F
• http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/060504_red_jr.html
• http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/1998/triton.html
• http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200607/s1697309.htm
• http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread221608/pg1

When you write the article, make sure it is properly attributed and the information comes from reliable sources. Also, make sure it is free of any personal bias. Good luck with the article. Also, it has to meet the notability guidelines, otherwise it might be deleted. Good luck with the article. -- soum (0_o) 17:42, 8 April 2007 (UTC) reply

The primary reason we don't need Hoagland's stuff here is notability. Some 9/11 conspiracy theories are well known and deserve being mentioned, but "artificial Iapetus" is certainly not. Wikipedia is not a collection of crackpot theories.-- JyriL ^talk 13:14, 15 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Manchu, I got an unsigned comment on my talk page from you regarding some edit I made. I suppose you referred to my edit of 17 April on the Conjunction page, when I removed a link to your site. It is a spamlink. From what I can tell, your website deals with your private occultist conspiracy fantasy, and that is not a generally accepted explanation of the significance (if conjunctions even have any significance at all) of a specific conjunction: so it has no place in an encyclopedia. Your Talk page is full of complaints of your vandalism. Stop propagating BS. Tom Peters 11:42, 25 April 2007 (UTC) reply

plz dont remove it,its important.

It's not accurate though -- Bugguyak 15:12, 29 April 2007 (UTC) reply

• thanks for adding that new sightings! i went ahead and fixed the way it was cited, and I removed the blog reference because they got their source from the Times of India which you already referenced (:O) in the future, you may want to try to use the wikipedia template for citing a reference Wikipedia:Citation_templates.
  

As for creating a new India article just on UFO sightings, first create some main articles on an event that occured so that we can link to it, for example for UFO sightings in Brazil notice how each sighting has a main article, so first create some main articles on India UFO sightings so that we can create a UFO sightings in India article to list them, hope this makes sense? if not let me know. (:O) - Nima Baghaei ^{talk · cont · email} 18:21, 2 May 2007 (UTC) reply

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 12:23, 3 May 2007 (UTC) reply

When you are reverted, and wish to re-revert, you should explain your edits on the article's talk page. Continually reverting without discussion is uncivil and unproductive. The way, the truth, and the light 11:55, 11 May 2007 (UTC) reply

just shut up,you are reverting and editing my work.manchurian candidate— Preceding unsigned comment added by Manchurian candidate ( talk • contribs)

The way, the truth, and the light has involved you in this WP:AN/I post. -- 24.136.230.38 13:04, 13 May 2007 (UTC) reply

With regard to the predicted Grand conjunction I thought my edit summary was sufficiently clear, this is an event in the future and I assumed it was evident that the December 23 page is a page of historical events.

While the likelihood of the conjunction failing to occur is infinitesimally small and would probably require a cataclysmic event to prevent it, the fact remains that it is a prediction.

You will find it here 2007#Scheduled_events and when it has occurred no doubt you or somebody else will write a Wikipedia article about it showing why it is " notable" but until it has happened it is not history. -- Drappel 12:51, 14 May 2007 (UTC) reply

The talk pages of articles are for discussion related to the article itself, not discussion of the topic. Please don't add speculation like this. → Ollie ( talk • contribs) 16:18, 15 May 2007 (UTC) reply

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Global warming. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policy for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Thank you. -- Cielomobile ^{talk / contribs} 07:43, 1 June 2007 (UTC) reply

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Global warming, you will be blocked from editing. -- Cielomobile ^{talk / contribs} 07:46, 1 June 2007 (UTC) reply

You're trolling, and I am not going to play your games. Stop it, or you will be blocked. -- Cielomobile ^{talk / contribs} 07:51, 1 June 2007 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on 2007 European heat wave, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{ hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

A tag has been placed on Indian general election, 2009, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{ hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. John Hayes 12:39, 2 June 2007 (UTC) reply

It seems you copied and pasted a warning from your talk page to another user's talk page. Please do not do this. The signature, timestamp, and article in the warning were all incorrect. To add a warning to someone's user page, use {{subst:uw-create1}} or another appropriate warning message that can be found here. Cheers. -- MZMcBride 04:40, 10 June 2007 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your enthusiastic nomination of 2007-2008 world food price crisis as a featured article candidate. It is certainly a live topic that needs too reach a wider audience. That though the great problem for this article as a featured article candidate. This crisis is continuing, and the situation is changing daily, making it impossible to write a stable encyclopedic article at this time. As you know, featured article criteria are strict and this candidacy is likely to fail, but only after taking up the time of hard-pressed reviewers. For a start, it has not yet been peer reviewed, or copy-edited. Best I think is to withdraw the candidacy and resubmitting it later when it has a greater chance of success. You withdraw an article by cutting and pasting: :Withdrawn ~~~~ here.

Thank you for your time, -- ROGER DAVIES  ^talk 14:54, 14 April 2008 (UTC) reply

Hi there,

Please make an effort to read WP:UNDUE and WP:FRINGE before you involve in an edit war. If you are so sure you are right, ask someone else. Wiki San Roze ^†αLҝ 12:51, 30 July 2008 (UTC) reply

Please, please and please read WP:UNDUE and WP:FRINGE so that none of us waste our precious time. It is very common on wikipedia that editors take comments as critics agaisnt them and prolongs the issue very badly. Let me explain again, the article on Ahmedabad bombing is about the incidents and not about possible conspiracy. I was the one who added the comments of Sushma to that article, not anyone else. But to have a link on the see also is giving it an undue weightage. Once again please try to assume good faith and read the wiki statutes which will be useful for both of us. Ciao Wiki San Roze ^†αLҝ 11:23, 31 July 2008 (UTC) reply

Hi, I'm really not comfortable with your addition of the Ghost Recon similarities passage to 2008 South Ossetia war. It reads like pure WP:Original research as it's completely unsourced - I don't think unsourced stuff really belongs in an article that contentious. ~ mazca ^{t | c} 12:44, 11 August 2008 (UTC) reply

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you.

Your post "Possilbe man made" in the article "2009 swine flu outbreak" was marked as Vandalism and deleted. Please refrain from posting false sections in articles in the future. Thanks-- Ken Durham ( talk) 18:42, 28 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Note that what you did wasn't actually vandalism; don't worry, it's not that bad. It's still not quite allowed though - read over some of the links above, they should be helpful. Happy editing! ╟─ Treasury Tag► contribs─╢ 19:08, 28 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. ╟─ Treasury Tag► contribs─╢ 18:45, 28 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Hi, I noticed you removed the note from Template:State of the Union that specified when a certain speech was not officially a State of the Union address, though for all intents and purposes functioned like one. This seemed like a fair compromise as opposed to just excluding those speeches from the template. Is there any reason for the removal? Joshdboz ( talk) 19:50, 2 September 2009 (UTC) reply

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 09:38, 16 April 2010 (UTC) reply

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Talk:United States presidential election, 2012, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. I'm not a Jindal fan, but that was some pretty vile, absurd nonsense, and has no place here. -- Orange Mike | Talk 16:28, 16 April 2010 (UTC) reply

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 16:27, 20 April 2010 (UTC) reply

As a frequent editor of American politics, I would appreciate if you put your two cents into the debate over the conservative support for President Obama in Talk:Public image of Barack Obama. Thanks.-- Jerzeykydd ( talk) 22:45, 24 April 2010 (UTC) reply

Hello! I just wanted to let you know that I removed the image of the PAK FA from the FGFA section in the article as the two are different aircraft and we don't really know what final shape the FGFA will take yet. This is primarily due to the consensus reached on the FGFA article. Thanks and have a great day, Vedant ( talk) 16:53, 22 May 2010 (UTC) reply

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 05:00, 6 June 2010 (UTC) reply

check out wp:cheatsheet which will show you how to use some of the wikitext tools, and how to edit talk pages and articles effectively. -- Ludwigs2 17:22, 16 June 2010 (UTC) reply

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Universe. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - DVdm ( talk) 17:03, 18 June 2010 (UTC) reply

I'm re-posting this here, in the hopes that you will read it, as you seem to genuinely want to contribute to Wikipedia.

The purpose of Wikipedia is to summarize the views of well-established, well-accepted sources of information, not to publish new or cutting-edge information. In the context of science articles, the relevant policies are WP:RS, WP:UNDUE, and WP:FRINGE. The idea that the shape of the universe might be measured is noteworthy and has been widely published -- and is already mentioned in the article. Your favourite authour's idea about what that shape ends up being, on the other hand, has not yet been published in peer-reviewed journals and is not accepted as being any better than the many other proposals in that regard. As such, it doesn't merit a mention in the Universe article, and at best merits a very short mention (along with the other options proposed with similar confidence by their proponents) in the shape of the Universe article (already done), and possibly a paragraph at the page about the paper's authour (also already done).

The term "dodecahedron multiverse" does not appear in the paper you cite. Using the word "multiverse" seems to be your own idea. That sort of thing is forbidden by the WP:NOR policy.

If you continue to re-insert this material against the advice of all of the other editors on this page, after all of the policies have been explained to you, then what you're doing is called "edit warring". Per the WP:EW policy, it'll get you blocked if you continue doing it. Logging out and going on a reversion spree as an IP will also get you blocked, very quickly.

You seem to want to contribute constructively, so please restrain yourself to contributing within Wikipedia's rules. There are places where you can push cutting-edge proposals more strongly; Wikipedia isn't one of them. -- Christopher Thomas ( talk) 19:25, 18 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thanks for your edit on Rubens Barrichello. I reverted your edit because it was an edit based on the typical misunderstanding.

• The figure that you edited is the number of "entries". Barrichello made his 300th "entry" at the 2010 Hungary GP. Therefore, "300", the number before your edit, is correct.
• Barichello wiil celebrate his 300th "race" at the next grand prix in Belgium ( 1994 San Marino Grand Prix is not counted in this figure).
• Wikipedia also counts "race start" like famous Marlboro Grand Prix Guide's style [1]. (in this method, Barrichello's "race start" is counted as "296")

The number of "race" is not counted in Wikipedia. Thank you for your understanding.-- Morio ( talk) 12:22, 13 August 2010 (UTC) reply

The article Smt. Selvi & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

copyvio removed; no meaningful content left

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 21:20, 11 November 2010 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Standing committee (India) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Zachlipton ( talk) 06:40, 8 February 2011 (UTC) reply

Hi. When you recently edited Lok Sabha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Revolutionary Socialist Party ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:24, 6 April 2012 (UTC) reply

I have reverted your edit (this material for the second time, same reason), your edit summary of "dont remove sex scandle.This is mainstream news attributed." is not backed up by your edit. Your source, is not Indian, it's not in english, it's from Vietnam, and even if that was all ok (and it could be), the link you've provided, is invalid, there is no story at the link you use as a reference, there isn't even actually a page at the link you provided. Therefore, in accordance with WP:BLP policy, I have removed the unsourced material. If you have other "mainstream news" sources, you should cite those and re-add the material. -- Maelefique ^(talk) 06:36, 9 April 2012 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Indian presidential election, 2012 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Suri 100 ( talk) 12:02, 23 April 2012 (UTC) reply

Did you READ before adding!? The exact information is already there in prose and its now redudnant. Lihaas ( talk) 22:12, 25 July 2012 (UTC) reply

Multiple blankings of pages/templates wuthout reason/discussion IS vandalism and constituted as such! You have blanked the entire page twice and that is vandalism and not AGF. You do it again and you will be reported!

As mentioned above, READ the page first. READ the section. EXACTLY what you add is already mentioned in prose.You ahve been told and you did the same things signifying you ignored and dint bother to read it. The data is all there in prose and nothing is different!

Furthermore, see WP:OSE. Lihaas ( talk) 13:46, 30 July 2012 (UTC) reply

1. you are not allowed to blank the page, without consensus at that. Thats pure vandalism (and more so when you repeat it). Secondly, yes MP/MLAs do count because their vote has a certain value that adds up, so the actual number is relevant. See the other election pages that mention the number of MP/MLAs Lihaas ( talk) 17:57, 11 August 2012 (UTC) reply

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Indian presidential election, 2012, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Lihaas ( talk) 18:00, 11 August 2012 (UTC) reply

I have duly explained to you that you have reentered REDUNDANT info which is already cited to the same source in the section you are adding it to. You dont want to discuss but come online just to revert and war. Rest assured you will be blocked if you continue to blank \pages and revert as such

Further you ahve blindly reverted everythign without reason which shows a sistinct lack f AGF. Per your BOLD addition use BRD instead of warring! Lihaas ( talk) 05:30, 12 August 2012 (UTC) reply

Look, you are wY past AGF. There is a discussion n talk USE it. At this point you are edit warring for your eversion and that is vandalism! Ths is your final warning to discuss the issue cause you are entering redudnant data Lihaas ( talk) 07:37, 17 August 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Geosynchronous Satellite Launch Vehicle Mk III, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orbital ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:22, 16 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC) reply

It appears you haven't been active in a couple years, but if you happen to check in, then you should address some serious copyright issues at this article, as you created it and added the majority of content to it. - ^theWOLFchild 20:55, 26 December 2017 (UTC) reply