I wanted to thank you for your compliment a while back regarding my work on Quds Force. Alas, I think I will take a break from it. A whole bunch of new editors have come to the page. In accordance with wikipolicy, I assume goodwill on their part but sometimes it seems like special interest groups form to systematically push a particular agenda or view on pages related to their agenda. A good example might be the battle between people who are apparently ethnic Greeks and apparently ethnic Persians over the Battle of Thermopylae and the film 300_(film). Anyway, it appears to me, that a group of ethnic Persians who have a bias towards Iran have been editing pages in a way favorable to Iran both on the Quds Force page but also on pages like US raid on Iranian liaison office in Arbil. In both cases I have tried to provide balance but I am one person and they are a group (that appears to be coordinated). I will assume good faith on their part and that they really believe that the Iranian view of current events is the objective view. I just this it is frustrating and a shame that because an apparently coordinated group decides to "adopt" a page and there is only one person working on the same page with a different perspective, that the article takes the POV (IMHO) of the special interest group. Again, thanks for the compliment and for letting me vent here. I'll be back to that page after a while :-)-- 71.197.138.180 18:15, 20 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Excuse me! I resent the copyright violation allegation against the material I added to the Teva Pharmaceutical Industries page. The history of the company I wrote is sourced from the company's website, and inevitably uses a few words and phrases from it, but I did write an original text that I think flows somewhat better, and is more objective (ie, less of a sales script). Please would you restore my text. -- GJeffery 19:37, 7 June 2006 (UTC) reply

GJeffery, I'm sorry to cause any hard feelings in this matter and appreciate the time you put into the article, but after reviewing the previous Teva Pharmaceutical History section as well as the introduction section still remaining, both are clear violations of copywrite. For example:

Your text [1]:

Teva was founded in Jerusalem in 1901 as a small wholesale drug business, distributing medicines imported on the backs of camels and donkeys. The company was called Salomon, Levin and Elstein Ltd., after its founders, and this name still serves as the pharmaceutical marketing arm of Teva in Israel.

Company text [2]:

Teva was founded in Jerusalem in 1901 as a small wholesale drug business in Jerusalem that distributed imported medicines loaded onto the backs of camels and donkeys, to customers throughout the land. The company was called Salomon, Levin and Elstein Ltd., after its founders. From that day until the present this name has served as the pharmaceutical marketing arm of Teva in Israel.

Your text:

In 1980, Teva acquired the second largest Israeli drug manufacturer Ikapharm, together with Plantex, a manufacturer of pharmaceutical active ingredients. This acquisition enabled Teva to separate penicillin production and non-penicillin drugs, an essential requirement of international health authorities, paving the way for Teva's entry to the US market. In 1982 Teva was granted FDA approval for its Kfar Saba (Ikapharm) manufacturing plant. At the same time, Teva commenced trading its ADR on the NASDAQ.

Company text:

In 1980, Teva acquired the second largest Israeli drug manufacturer Ikapharm (later dissolved in 1982 and merged into Teva) together with Plantex - an API manufacturer. This acquisition enabled Teva to separate penicillin production and non-penicillin drugs, an essential requirement of international health authorities, paving the way for Teva's entry to the US market. In 1982 Teva was granted FDA approval for its Kfar Saba (Ikapharm) manufacturing plant. At the same time, Teva commenced trading its American Depository Receipts (ADRs) on the NASDAQ, over the counter market in the USA.

I've been editing enough to completely understand that it can sometimes be difficult to avoid similar wording or phrasing when writing an article, but some of these sentences are copied word for word. Even if properly cited, I don't believe Wikipedia allows this much quoting unless there is a very good reason/rationale and it is unmistakably marked. You might want to look at these pages for further clarification Wikipedia:Copyrights, Wikipedia:Copyright FAQ, and Wikipedia:Fair use#Text. This article needs to be completely rewritten anyway because the existing introduction, written by a previous user, is a copy/paste job from the front page here. Before I do anything though I'd appreciate a response. Thanks, Joshdboz 20:11, 7 June 2006 (UTC) reply

Hello, Joshdboz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Lectonar 30 June 2005 13:05 (UTC)

After you prodded Robert Kilmain, someone removed the prod tag and hoax warning without explanation. So I've moved it to AfD. Personally, I'd just use AfD for hoaxes, if you're pretty sure. A bad-faith entry is likely to get a bad-faith objection, forcing it to AfD anyway. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Kilmain. NickelShoe 04:48, 8 March 2006 (UTC) reply

I only removed it because I felt it was obvious, pretty much I think when somone is identified as Israeli they are assumed to be Jewish unless it specifally says otherwise.- Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg | Talk 11:03, 21 April 2006 (UTC) reply

"And I gathered you together, and I rescued you from all places" is what the seal says. Sounds like a quote but I don't recognise the source. -- woggly 19:13, 16 May 2006 (UTC) reply

It is a biblical verse. I will find the source for you this evening. Danny 20:02, 16 May 2006 (UTC) reply

Thanks to both of you! I will update the page. Joshdboz 20:42, 16 May 2006 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Miri Regev.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:07, 23 May 2006 (UTC) reply

Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Dan Harel, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

-- Cactus.man ✍ 19:50, 31 May 2006 (UTC) reply

I just discovered you're a great contributor of Israel-related articles. Please add any news ones to Portal:Israel/New in order to let others know too. -- Shuki 18:51, 6 June 2006 (UTC) reply

Thanks. Will do in the future. Joshdboz 19:34, 6 June 2006 (UTC) reply

Hello, Joshdboz. I rewrote the article. I was aware that the content had been copied, but it was a very small amount and was fact-type information (facts cannot be copyrighted). I should have rewritten it, but I was hoping that it would be reworked eventually. When an article is composed of copyrighted content, but is notable, it is common practice to write a short paragraph or two so that Wikipedia has at least some information on it. Also, the existence of the article encourages contributions to it.

If you continue to have problems with the editor, you can try the most appropriate administrator contact on Wikipedia:Requests for administrator attention. However, it should be made clear that it is a policy matter (like not posting copyrighted content), rather than what should go into an article (content dispute). Thanks, Kjkolb 17:48, 8 June 2006 (UTC) reply

Actually, on the image description page, this is all you had written:

Cropped photo of Miri Regev from IDF website

So under the terms of CSD I6 this image had been tagged for lacking a fair use rationale and was deleted per policy. I can restore the image description page if you like, but considering it's one line it would seem to me that it would be just as easy for you to copy-paste it when you re-upload the image. Regards, howch e ng { chat} 06:32, 9 June 2006 (UTC) reply

I am at work at the moment and cannot make to many Wiki edits but I think you may find this article informative. In it SSgt Wuterich giving his side of the story to the Washington Post.-- Looper5920 12:01, 15 June 2006 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the heads up, will add from it. Joshdboz 14:51, 15 June 2006 (UTC) reply

• Could I ask you to revert the change of Operation Just Cause until the argument has been finished on the Military History talk page. While I agree that the original article should be titled the invasion of Panama there is still not a consensus on whether it is appropriate for military members to have operational names on there pages. I am not going to revert war or argue incessibly but rather ask you just keep it until a consensus is reached. Your call. Cheers-- Looper5920 10:52, 20 June 2006 (UTC) reply
  • Done, no problem -- Joshdboz 11:32, 20 June 2006 (UTC) reply

Is this you? How cool is that??? - CobaltBlueTony

Yeah, thanks for the link!-- Joshdboz 01:02, 6 August 2006 (UTC) reply

I can't get to it right away, but I can drop in and look over the article for you. -- Lethargy 21:09, 11 September 2006 (UTC) reply

It was no problem. Sorry I took so long to get to it, BTW. -- Lethargy 00:23, 21 September 2006 (UTC) reply

Zaam ha-El is correct. Danny 21:31, 11 September 2006 (UTC) reply

Sure thing. It was a great article and deserves to be FA. UberCryxic 23:17, 16 September 2006 (UTC) reply

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		In recognition of your work in helping to keep the extremely controversial article Operation Wrath of God as much NPOV as you can, I award you the Barnstar of Diligence. CG 22:11, 17 September 2006 (UTC) reply

I just started a Mandarin class, so I looked up Farber's book on the subject, and that got me thinking about Farber, who I haven't heard on the radio for a long time. His book has wonderful anecdotes and his own brilliant metaphors, which I remember from his show. I hope to do more with it later, partly from some of the biographical information he has in "How to Learn Any Language." Thanks again, Noroton 19:24, 19 September 2006 (UTC) reply

Hi again,

I don't know if you'd have an opinion on this or think it worth voting on, but the "Category:American conservatives" page has been proposed for deletion. I think it's a useful category so I voted to keep it, but three others want to delete it. If you have an opinion, please cast a vote. Thanks for the link to the web page, by the way. Noroton 22:02, 20 September 2006 (UTC) reply

Hi Joshdboz, Thanks for your vote at the Category:American Conservative discussion. The votes were 2:1 in favor of keeping it. You might have an interest in an article I've just created Pre-Iraq War opinions on Saddam Hussein. It's poorly named (something I want to change) but as it stands now, it's essentially statements made about how dangerous Saddam's regime was considered before the war. The article is being proposed for deletion, but I of course think it's useful. I'd be interested to know what you think. Noroton 01:27, 27 September 2006 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the input. I think there are a number of different ways to reform this into something else, and I'll be exploring it. Much appreciated, Noroton 15:46, 27 September 2006 (UTC) reply

hmmm. Just noticed it. I think mine is alot better. Will be longer to, mine is more likely to be featured then the other one. By the way my title is better then "Reconstruction" it is alot more desprictive. -- Zonerocks 04:01, 29 September 2006 (UTC) reply

Look im still working on this. It isn't finished. But i am dedicated to this article. Ive been working on it for a very long time planning it. It should be finished by tuesday. Don't put this up for deletion. I am proud of my work. Just keep it. -- Zonerocks 18:01, 29 September 2006 (UTC) reply

Look don't send it to AFD until im done making it, ok? -- Zonerocks 21:09, 29 September 2006 (UTC) reply

Thanks for asking about whether it's OK to change the reference style to footnotes in the Muslim Brotherhood articles. Please go ahead; I think footnotes are much better, and I just used the Harvard style references because I couldn't figure out how to make footnotes in Wikipedia. Many thanks! Beroul 02:13, 3 October 2006 (UTC) reply

On 2 November, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Commission to Assess the Ballistic Missile Threat to the United States, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

-- GeeJo ^(t)⁄ _(c) • 16:52, 2 November 2006 (UTC) reply

Hey Josh! Just want to say congrats again for making it on FA! Great work for all the NPOV and others you strived to work on! Vic226 01:21, 25 November 2006 (UTC) Strike-through text reply

Thanks so much! Joshdboz 01:38, 25 November 2006 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the input. As a Jew, I feel very passionate about this subject, and would like as much of the full story to be told as possible.

I get a bit irritated when people climb all over me for NPOV, when it's plain that facts have no POV. The fact that the Germans botched the rescue operation and failed to save the Israelis cannot be glossed over or whitewashed. At least one person who complained to me about POV sounded like he was an apologist for the terrorists - and when I told him so, in just those words, he backed off. A lot of what I've contributed to the article comes directly from the Groussard, Reeve and Klein books - if people want EVERY SINGLE CITATION included, the article would be twice as long as it already is.

Again, thanks for reading, and for your kind words.

BassPlyr23 18:00, 26 November 2006 (EDT)

This discussion was moved from User:Joshdboz by Vic226.

The dictionary definition is very clear. Read it. Any other definistion is an insensitive, ideological insult.

Im my case, the terrorists, who tried to kill 400 university students, are routinely called "activists". It's an insult. And yeah, I take it personally. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scott Adler ( talk • contribs) 03:28, 27 November 2006

I'm sorry for what you have gone through. However, Wikipedia is not therapy, and therefore could not and should not be responsible for what you have experienced. While this might sound harsh to you (and I apologize for anything in advance), we cannot be lenient on and introduce edits that are against the Wikipedia policies and guidelines (in this case, maintenance of neutral point of view) just because it is the only way to make you feel better. Regards, Vic226 _talk 05:00, 27 November 2006 (UTC) reply

Hello,

I've left comments on Talk:Commission to Assess the Ballistic Missile Threat to the United States.

Cheers, -- Ling.Nut 04:29, 29 November 2006 (UTC) reply

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled " Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. Cocoaguy _contribs ^talk 00:50, 2 January 2007 (UTC) reply

The usage of the word "terrorist" is required in this situation. These groups are terrorist organizations and should therefore be called terrorist organizations. Calling them anything else allows them dignity that they dont deserve! Simply calling everybody a 'militant' makes a soldier and a terrorist equal. A terrorist is clearly completely different than a militant. These groups are the definition of terrorists. Brilliance 02:36, 16 January 2007 (UTC). reply

I have revised the article to be neutral as well as inform the truth. Brilliance 03:02, 16 January 2007 (UTC). reply

Thank you for reminding me of this. Brilliance 19:12, 16 January 2007 (UTC). reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Gabi_Ashkenazi.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈ talk 00:30, 23 January 2007 (UTC) reply

User_talk:128.206.48.17#Thank_you_for_experimenting. Travb ( talk) 17:33, 27 January 2007 (UTC) reply

Thanks a lot. I will take care of the article as soon as I finished with Abbas Kiarostami. Take care. Sangak 17:40, 4 February 2007 (UTC) reply

You can ask an admin who deleted the image. I think it's best to watch any image you upload (or the talk page of the uploader) because usually a warning will be given before it is deleted. -- Ynhockey ^{( Talk)} 03:32, 8 February 2007 (UTC) reply

I don't know if you ultimately figured it out, but the deletion log should be helpful. Tewfik ^Talk 02:54, 1 March 2007 (UTC) reply

Hi Joshdboz. I notice you have an interested in the Mossad. I also notice there are a lot of Mossad related articles but there is no Category:Mossad. There is precedence for such a category as Category:Central Intelligence Agency exists. Do you think it is worth creating a Mossad category? Best. -- 70.51.232.70 19:41, 13 February 2007 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Meyrav Wurmser.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 48 hours after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ed g2s • talk 15:18, 16 February 2007 (UTC) reply

There is a template Politics of Iran and on this template, there is a link to Iran international crisis since 24 December 2006, which seems to me normal.

Because he does not like the page, Gerash77 not only has suppressed this link on 9 February 2007 and has since entered into an edit war by suppressing it every day. On top of that, he is trying to create problems for me. He has told an administrator, user:AndrewRT that I was the problem, created this edit war, asked him to send me warnings etc.

Since you have contributed to the Iran international crisis article, I thought you could help me. Any idea how to fight this? Alain10 19:18, 17 February 2007 (UTC) reply

Hey thank you for putting up a picture of the book cover! I tried unsuccessfully to put up a "too-high" of resolution picture of the cover recently, but it was hastily deleted, so thanks again. Fdssdf 23:48, 20 February 2007 (UTC) reply

No problem. Joshdboz 00:13, 21 February 2007 (UTC) reply

I agree with the move. However, I wanted to mention that cut and paste moves are to be avoided, for GFDL reasons. Please see m:Help:Moving a page or Wikipedia:Requested moves in the future when moving a page. -- Interiot 17:15, 25 February 2007 (UTC) reply

Thanks! I was unaware of the issue. Joshdboz 17:27, 25 February 2007 (UTC) reply

Every argument for keeping Image:Samjhaut Express bombings.jpg was equally argued for deletion. If you look at sheer numbers there were four keeps (TheFEARgod, Joshdboz, Nishkid64, and Kafziel) and four deletes (Rebelguys2, lamunknown, Geni and Megapixie), as I count someone refuting a keep statement as someone you supports deleting the image. Plus, I believe deletion is the correct thing to do per current Wikipedia fair use policy, specifically #8 and counterexamples, specifically #5. In my opinion, the image did not add significantly to article and was being used merely for illustration. If you want to see the use of a press photo that I believe meets policy, look at the image in the Oklahoma City bombing article. Read the "Effect on children" paragraph and you will see commentary about the copyrighted image on the right. If you would like to get someone to review my decision, please request a deletion review -Regards Nv8200p talk 16:03, 2 March 2007 (UTC) reply

I make my decisions based on policy, guidelines and consensus in that order. Like you said, consensus did not exist, however, I think the guideline and policy pointed the way toward deletion. Request a deletion review if you believe the image should stay. - Nv8200p talk 22:26, 2 March 2007 (UTC) reply

About "Asgari", you are right. One of the admins shoud move it (it's not possible now). About "Ali-Reza" or "Ali Reza", "Ali-Reza" is correct, because it's his first name (the difference between "Ali Reza" and "Ali-Reza" is not important for google search). Jahangard 23:44, 12 March 2007 (UTC) reply

The article you contributed too is up for deletion. -- 70.51.234.169 23:01, 20 May 2007 (UTC) reply

Some random Needham guy did a pretty good job on this article: [3] Vic ₂₂₆ ^說 23:20, 6 June 2007 (UTC) reply

Image:Ap munich905 t.jpg does not qualify for fair use in the article Operation Wrath of God. The use of this Associated Press photo is being limited to Munich Massacre. Use in Operation Wrath of God violates WP:NFCC #8. This image is not significant for this article. Please do not add it back or it may result in the image being deleted from Wikipedia all together. -Thanks Nv8200p talk 16:21, 2 July 2007 (UTC) reply

Please see discussion over use of the image at Wikipedia:Images_and_media_for_deletion/2007_June_27#Image:Ap_munich905_t.jpg. The way you are using the image is decorative and unncessary. The event depicted in the image happened before Operation Wrath of God. Yes, this is opinion, but seems to be the majority opinion these days. You are welcome to start the dispute resolution process. I am adding comments to the Operation Wrath of God talk page. -Regards Nv8200p talk 16:59, 2 July 2007 (UTC) reply

Hi Joshdboz. You are off to such a great start on the article Nuclear weapons and Israel that it may qualify to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page under the Did you know... section. Appearing on the Main Page may help bring publicity and assistance to the article. However, there is a five day from article creation window for Did you know... nominations. Before five days pass from the date the article was created and if you haven't already done so, please consider nominating the article to appear on the Main Page by posting a nomination at Did you know suggestions. If you do nominate the article for DYK, please cross out the article name on the "Good" articles proposed by bot list. Again, great job on the article. -- Jreferee ^{( Talk)} 18:33, 2 July 2007 (UTC) reply

When you pasted stockpile information in Nuclear weapons and Israel, you lost most information on bibliographical reference. I am reverse engineering it, but for single author works it is practically impossible. I could not find from where you copied the reference pointers. Can you fix it, or at least point me to your sources? Thank you very much. Lgfcd ( talk) 23:49, 6 December 2012 (UTC) reply

On 6 July, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Nuclear weapons and Israel, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

-- Carabinieri 00:17, 6 July 2007 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Elyezer Shkedy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:25, 18 July 2007 (UTC) reply

Whoa, whoa, whoa. I think you're misinterpreting the meaning of the word vandalism. What I did cannot on any planet be classified as vandalism. Ok, now that that's settled, you agree that is OR, and OR is not allowed. Therefore, it is not allowed. ColdFusion650 20:44, 9 August 2007 (UTC) reply

I don't believe that criteria is listened on WP:VANDAL. Making bold edits is explicitly listed as not vandalism. I also gave a reason. It's original research. While I understand that there is some confusion between vandalism and edits you don't like, some people around here can get mad at being called a vandal. So, you should probably be careful with that. ColdFusion650 00:04, 10 August 2007 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Elazar Stern.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:03, 9 September 2007 (UTC) reply

Hi Josh, I have commented on your nomination at T:TDYK. The entry is unlikely to be used on the main page unless the issue I have raised is adressed. Please note that this page asks nominators to: "Please check back for comments on your nomination. Responding to reasonable objections will help ensure that your article is listed."-- Carabinieri 13:24, 21 September 2007 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the heads up! Joshdboz 17:09, 21 September 2007 (UTC) reply

Hello again. If you look at the last edit from this article, an anon user has added two sentences, one refering to a book and one refering to a YouTube video. Could you assess the relevance of these two references, and maybe modify their locations to suit WP manual of style? thank you. CG 19:05, 14 October 2007 (UTC) reply

On November 20, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Robert F. Kennedy's speech on the assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr., which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid64 ( talk) 22:23, 20 November 2007 (UTC) reply

Rename I simply renamed it for the purposes of alphabetical order. You'll note that your US and UK examples also incidentally fit this standard. - Justin (koavf)· T· C· M 19:38, 9 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Thanks! :) Cheers, Dav nel 03 ^{Sign It, Junior!} 16:44, 27 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Please refrain from your recent edit on the Benziar Bhutto page. Thank you Eldorado91 ( talk) 21:54, 28 December 2007 (UTC) reply

I recommend instead taking this discussion to the talk page of the article. Further, I recommend that you cite policy for deletion and read WP:POINT, Eldorado. SorryGuy  Talk  21:57, 28 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Glad that I could be of any help ;-) Feel free to ping me in future, however you may get a quicker response from Wikipedia:Requests for administrator attention. Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 22:49, 28 December 2007 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Earthfrisk Launches Meta Social Search.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI ( talk) 22:18, 1 January 2008 (UTC) reply

The photo was from the soc gen network facebook, not sure if it is legit to post. I however just noticed that it is also up on the Telegraph website, so I would think it is fair use. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2008/01/24/bcnsocgen924.xml

Tell me when you're exhausted with Directorate of General Security. You've done a great job so far. -- Shark face 217 04:54, 25 January 2008 (UTC) reply

You deserve this:

		The Original Barnstar
		For doing an incredible job on Directorate of General Security and Directorate 14, I, Shark face 217, hereby award you this barnstar. Keep up the good work! -- Shark face 217 19:29, 26 January 2008 (UTC) reply

Cheers. -- Shark face 217 19:29, 26 January 2008 (UTC) reply

My edits unstacked the refs, too, and I was reverted by the same guy. I wish we could get some official guideline on this. Should template refs be stacked or shouldn't they? Robert K S ( talk) 07:28, 28 January 2008 (UTC) reply

There doesn't appear to be any guideline. The choice of how to format citations is up to each editor, so I think it would be best to bring it up on that article's talk page to arrive at a consensus. Joshdboz ( talk) 13:10, 28 January 2008 (UTC) reply

On 29 January, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Mohammed al-Shahwani, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

-- Daniel Case ( talk) 05:26, 29 January 2008 (UTC) reply

Thank you for creating Democrats Abroad primary, 2008! Kingturtle ( talk) 13:51, 5 February 2008 (UTC) reply

No problem. It sounds like they were trying to steal some thunder by being the first count reporting on Super Tuesday, but judging by media coverage so far they'll need to work a bit harder to compete with Dixville Notch. Joshdboz ( talk) 17:14, 5 February 2008 (UTC) reply

I thing maybe probably accidentally. sorry) —Preceding unsigned comment added by US - Jimmy Slade ( talk • contribs) 22:35, 6 February 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the heads up. I have been writing about the IDF more and more these days and may try to expand the article during the weekend. Maybe not. Currently I'm writing another article, Bamahane. -- Ynhockey ^{( Talk)} 02:30, 8 February 2008 (UTC) reply

It's true that the Telegraph says that, but they don't provide any evidence, and I really think they just misread the other article. If it happened, it would be all over the news, which it still isn't. Feel free to discuss further at Talk:Imad_Mugniyah#CIA_station_chief. Superm401 - Talk 13:52, 13 February 2008 (UTC) reply

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia_Republican_primary%2C_2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by US - Jimmy Slade ( talk • contribs) 19:54, 15 February 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Benjamin Gantz.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 19:39, 17 February 2008 (UTC) reply

Hi. Maybe you remeber me. Yesterday I has writted some wrong and after this I have blocked. Can you unblock me? pleaze I'm User:US - Jimmy Slade 89.178.46.126 ( talk) 23:28, 17 February 2008 (UTC) reply

I'm not an admin, and it is only a 24 hour block. If you want to dispute it the instructions are on your talk page. Joshdboz ( talk) 00:39, 18 February 2008 (UTC) reply

see cathegories http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:69.202.64.143 US - Jimmy Slade ( talk) 21:44, 24 February 2008 (UTC) reply

Please see Talk:United States presidential election in Massachusetts, 2008#Merger proposal.— Markles 00:08, 26 February 2008 (UTC) reply

Hello! You are listed as one of the main contributors to the article here. I just wanted to let you know the article is now on the featured articles candidates list and your support or input here would be valuable. Thanks -- Zaindy87 ( talk) 02:09, 8 March 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your help on the " A More Perfect Union" speech. I had thought that there would be an article on this speech by now, but I thought I would get a start on it. Again, thanks for help in expanding it. I really appreciate it. conman33 ( . . .talk) 01:11, 19 March 2008 (UTC) reply

I just added it to Did you know? for March 18. Just my luck, now there's a movement to delete the article. Be sure to help keep it, man! Thanks again. conman33 ( . . .talk) 04:48, 19 March 2008 (UTC) reply

An editor has nominated A More Perfect Union, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also " What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A More Perfect Union (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 10:59, 27 March 2008 (UTC) reply

I saw the not you left on our project's page and I just wanted to let you know that one of the articles that the MMM team has been working on is now up for FAC. We are hoping to get our first FA soon and so if you have the time to look over the article and leave your comments on the article we would love to hear them! :) -- Mfreud ( talk) 00:38, 6 April 2008 (UTC) reply

Hi there - yeah, I suggested it'd probably be best re-written from scratch, but if you want to have a go at creating a stub from this mess, I have userfied the deleted article at User:Black Kite/DIS. Black Kite 01:12, 10 April 2008 (UTC) reply

On 14 April, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Opération 14 juillet, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

-- Cirt ( talk) 12:10, 14 April 2008 (UTC) reply

Hey, as a member of Wikipedia: WikiProject Power in international relations, I'd like to invite you to come back and work on the project. There's still a lot of work to be done and we'd all appreciate your contributions. Please come back. -- Hobie ( talk) 02:43, 21 July 2008 (UTC) reply

OK, sorry, I just saw the debate on some user pages. If it is true/debatable, I am sure it will be published in some newspapers pretty soon. Poppy ( talk) 23:41, 30 August 2008 (UTC) reply

Hello, I notice you're using one of the {{ motd}} templates, run by Wikipedia:Motto of the day. You may have noticed that some of the mottos recently have been followed by a date from 2006, or on occasion simply "Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia". The reason for this is that Motto of the day is in some very serious need of help. Participation in the project, which has never been especially high, has dropped considerably over this past summer, to the point we have had several days where no motto was scheduled to appear at all. Over the past several weeks, I've been the only editor scheduling mottos at all, but there aren't enough comments on some of these mottos to justify their use. If we do not get some help - and soon - your daily mottos will stop. In order for us to continue updating these templates for you, we need your help.

When you get a chance between your normal editing, could you stop by our nominations page and leave a few comments on some of the mottos there, especially those that do not have any comments yet? This works very simply; you read a motto, decide whether or not you like it, and post your opinion just below the motto. That's it - no experience required, just an idea of what you personally like and what you feel reflects Wikipedia and its community. If you do have past experience with the project, then please close some of the older nominations once they've got a decent consensus going. There are directions on the nominations page on how to do this.

If you have any questions, please let me know, or post on the project's talk page. I'm looking forward to reading your comments on the suggested mottos, and any additional suggestions you'd like to make. Until then, happy editing! Hersfold ^{( t/ a/ c)} 01:41, 4 September 2008 (UTC) reply

The Sarah Palin wheel war arbitration case, on which you have commented, is now open.

• Evidence for the arbitrators may be submitted at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Sarah Palin protection wheel war/Evidence. Evidence should be submitted within one week, if possible.
• Your contributions are also welcome at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Sarah Palin protection wheel war/Workshop.

For the Arbitration Committee, Anthøny ✉ 21:12, 5 September 2008 (UTC) reply

[4] I have reverted your edit. While I can understand why you feel this way, WP:BLP applies throughout the encyclopedia. Let's try to keep that talk page focused on the actual article rather than the three-ring circus that surrounds it. Thanks. Risker ( talk) 00:39, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply

I notice that your comment on Talk:Naked Short Selling was summarily deleted by User:Risker.

I'm still getting up to speed with Wiki policies, but I thought that this was a no-no? cojoco ( talk) 00:44, 2 October 2008 (UTC) reply

On 18 October, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Eitan Ben Eliyahu, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Victuallers ( talk) 18:34, 18 October 2008 (UTC) reply

Thank you. I see you're the one who created some of those articles, including Eitan Ben Eliyahu recently :) -- Nudve ( talk) 06:51, 19 October 2008 (UTC) reply

On 27 October, 2008, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article(s) 2008 Abu Kamal raid, which you created or substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

-- Spencer ^{T♦ C} 00:24, 27 October 2008 (UTC) reply

I am extremely concerned about the action you took in deleting most of the page for `Abbas ibn `Abd al-Muttalib. This man played a central role in the early years of the Moslem religion and the Arab empire. He was a major historical figure. The action you took could be seen as an attack by Wikipedia on a religion shared by many hundreds of millions of people. I strongly urge you to immediately revert your edit. You may of course post appropriate notices to initiate a debate over copyright infringement, neutrality etc. I am sure many editors would be glad to help improve the article. But please revert immediately. This is urgent. Aymatth2 ( talk) 03:19, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply

Almost all of the text in that article had been plagiarized from another website (linked to on the talk page), without any permission given to use it. We do not use copied text without specific permission, its the law. This decision had nothing to do with the subject of the article. If you would like to, I would encourage you to improve the article yourself. Joshdboz ( talk) 03:26, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply

The text on http://www.bizbrowse.com/yarehman/islam/Special/companions/part-I.htm is probably in the public domain. Did you check? In this case, given the significance of the subject, it is far better to open the article to editor review than to arbitrarily remove it. I suspect that what you have done would seem to a Muslim like deleting most of the article on Christ on the basis that it is derived from one book, with dubious copyright. Will you revert or should I? Aymatth2 ( talk) 03:51, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply

For a sense of the importance of this topic, check http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/`Abbas_ibn_`Abd_al-Muttalib Aymatth2 ( talk) 04:29, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply

I do not doubt the importance of the subject. There are two issues with the text: 1) It was clearly copied, thus the burden is on the editor adding it to prove that the text is licensed in such a way to permit its use. The default is to delete copied text when in doubt. 2) Regardless of whether or not it is legal to use this text, it is written in an unencyclopedic way and frankly this is a very suspect looking website. Is this a reliable source? Is this historical fact or a somewhat embellished story? Again, I encourage you to improve and expand the article if it is important to you, but you should focus on writing your own words instead of looking for things to copy. Joshdboz ( talk) 13:13, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply

Sorry - I reacted too soon. It was late, I was tired, and when I found this massive deletion I was concerned, since the subject seems sensitive. But when I look at the content, you are right - not very encyclopediac at all, and clearly just copied from one source. One unfortunate effect: if you go back to the version before all this material was dumped in, http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=`Abbas_ibn_`Abd_al-Muttalib&diff=79290943&oldid=77539921, there was slightly more information and better references than there is now. Since then, a lot of editors have made changes, which will all have been lost. But yes, you did the right thing. Ignore my previous comments. Maybe someone who knows something about the subject will improve the article. Aymatth2 ( talk) 13:45, 6 November 2008 (UTC) reply

On 11 November, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article International opinion polling for the United States presidential election, 2008, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass ( talk) 03:00, 11 November 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Yishai Be'er.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 05:11, 13 November 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Avi Mizrahi.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 05:07, 14 November 2008 (UTC) reply

Hi Josh! I am also against copyright paranoia, however, the new fair use rules (actually in place for over a year by now) are fairly clear on this issue. Paragraph 12 states: Pictures of people still alive, groups still active, and buildings still standing; provided that taking a new free picture as a replacement (which is almost always considered possible) would serve the same encyclopedic purpose as the non-free image. This includes non-free promotional images.

In light of that, I can't really see a way that those images can be included. The IDF website is merely repeating what Israeli law already says, and according to both US and Israeli law, using an image of a living person on Wikipedia would be fair use. However, Wikipedia tries to make as little use as possible of fair use images without compromising the quality of the encyclopedia in the long run, which is what this policy/guideline is meant to explain (among other things).

On a side note, why not join WP Israel? Cheers, Ynhockey ^{( Talk)} 10:28, 14 November 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks, Joshdboz! The hook was a bit of a gift when I realised that an anecdote Stott told at her birthday gala concert could actually be reliably sourced. Espresso Addict ( talk) 17:55, 10 December 2008 (UTC) reply

We had the prepared expansion of the main IAF article who was supposed to be published at the end of November. Unfortunately the friend is late and we will still wait. And at present I am concentrating the work on the description moshav, kibuts and city of Israel going along main roads - from the motorway No. 1, No. 2 and currently dual carriageway No. 3. I am moving the expansion of military articles away for the more distant future, because you are wspracying economies of Israel and tourisms are being given to be an more important sentence. In this subject matter an aid from the English side would be useful Wiki. I am greeting, Gedeon07

Hey Joshdboz.I was checking some new pages and found out that you have written many new articles on the squads of IAF.The articles are very short and have been marked as stubs. I would like to ask you if you could make a new article on the squads with all of them included.Regards, avs_dps —Preceding unsigned comment added by Avs dps ( talk • contribs) 16:30, 14 December 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Yitzhak Harel.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 06:39, 15 December 2008 (UTC) reply

Good edits! Stick around, we need you. Viriditas ( talk) 02:59, 16 December 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks! Joshdboz ( talk) 03:13, 16 December 2008 (UTC) reply

Hi, I notice you are doing a lot of ref fixing on Caroline Kennedy. It's not clear to me exactly why you are changing all these references. Can you explain the logic? thanks. -- Crunch ( talk) 20:47, 19 December 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the explanation. It makes sense and I appreciate your work on this article. One thing I did find confusing is when vertically aligned refs were changed and they ended up as linear-formatted refs. I think these are harder to follow when editing. I believe Wiki style allows either. Any chance we can agree (understanding we're not the only editors) to use the vertically aligned reference style from now on? Thanks again for your diligence on this article. -- Crunch ( talk) 22:15, 19 December 2008 (UTC) reply

Maybe rather than changing the refs from vertical to horizontal, we could just leave them as the original editor did them. So, to each his own. I will add something to the talk page, but it will probably get buried. We'll see. -- Crunch ( talk) 23:13, 19 December 2008 (UTC) reply

I couldn't find this great new article at the DYK suggestion page. Were you planning on noming or should I? -- brew crewer (yada, yada) 03:14, 24 December 2008 (UTC) reply

Couldn't find a good hook? The article has DYK written all over it! I have a bunch of ideas, but I'll hold off some. I also want to work some more on the article. We still have a few days for the nom. You might have noticed that I edited (butchered) the article a bit. If you disagree with anything I did please don't hesitate to revert. Best, -- brew crewer (yada, yada) 06:05, 24 December 2008 (UTC) reply

I want to thank you and Brewcrewer for this article - I never considered writing one myself, partly because I didn't have all the documentation at hand to do a proper job of it, but also, sadly, it never crossed my mind! You've done a nice job of this. I'm Charlie Winters's daughter. If there's some way I can help, let me know. Corgi ( talk) 13:39, 24 December 2008 (UTC) reply

Hello! Your submission of Charles Winters at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!  Sandstein  19:33, 28 December 2008 (UTC) reply

On 30 December, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Charles Winters, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Cirt ( talk) 15:32, 30 December 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Yoav_Galant.jpg. Unfortunately, I think that you have not provided a proper rationale for using this image under "fair use". Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. Note that the image description page must include the exact name or a link to each article the image is used in and a separate rationale for each one. (If a link is used, automated processes may improperly add the related tag to the image. Please change the fair use template to refer to the exact name, if you see this warning.)

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kanonkas ( talk) 14:21, 9 January 2009 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Jacob B. Aaron requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Omarcheeseboro ( talk) 14:30, 11 January 2009 (UTC) reply

Please see the talk page for that article. Where does it say the website is public domain? -- Omarcheeseboro ( talk) 14:34, 11 January 2009 (UTC) reply

		The Resilient Barnstar
		Thank you for starting this new article. Bearian ( talk) 21:16, 15 January 2009 (UTC) reply

On 16 January, 2009, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article US Airways Flight 1549, which you created. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

-- Spencer ^{T♦ C} 02:02, 16 January 2009 (UTC) reply

Thank you for the new Commercial Ditchings category. Interesting and useful. Tempshill ( talk) 23:35, 16 January 2009 (UTC) reply

No problem. It's still a work in progress, so please add if it's missing some flights. Joshdboz ( talk) 06:54, 17 January 2009 (UTC) reply

You recently added information from a newspaper article to Chesley Sullenberger. I just wanted to say thank you for highlighting that article. From what I have read so far of it, it contains a great deal of info on his early life. Really appreciate it. Cheers. Terrakyte ( talk) 13:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC) reply

No problem, but you should thank the NYT for the snooping ; ) Excellent work on the article so far, by the way, it's almost at the top of the Google rankings already. Joshdboz ( talk) 13:13, 17 January 2009 (UTC) reply

Thank you very much for your compliment. :D Terrakyte ( talk) 13:16, 17 January 2009 (UTC) reply

You're asking "why not bold like any other title?" — See e.g. WP:BOLDTITLE and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (text formatting)#Boldface, where it says: If the article topic does not have a commonly accepted name, but is merely descriptive (e.g., history of the United States), the title does not need to appear in the first sentence, and is not bolded if it does (emphasis added). See also Wikipedia:Stop bolding everything for a more informal but nevertheless guideline-compatible take on the issue. It's a generic title and thus it should not be in boldface. 78.34.168.97 ( talk) 16:43, 18 January 2009 (UTC) reply

Same here btw. I've corrected it 78.34.154.49 ( talk) 23:13, 19 January 2009 (UTC) reply

On January 19, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Leon Keyserling, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky ( talk) 13:00, 19 January 2009 (UTC) reply

Hey there, I thought I'd drop by and say "hello" to my co-author on the Franklin D. Roosevelt 1933 presidential inauguration article. Amazing that there wasn't even so much as a stub on the subject before you got the ball rolling yesterday! I dare say we could submit it to DYK as is, but I'm sure we can add a little more first. I have to run right now, but I'll check in later to see where things stand, etc. Regards, Cgingold ( talk) 16:49, 22 January 2009 (UTC) reply

PS - You might also be interested in this CFD. Cgingold ( talk) 17:09, 22 January 2009 (UTC) reply

You're welcome! I tried to read up on him and it was hard to find. Thanks for writing the article! Hekerui ( talk) 20:04, 25 January 2009 (UTC) reply

On January 27, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Andrew Jackson 1829 presidential inauguration, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky ( talk) 10:25, 27 January 2009 (UTC) reply

about the ambassador to Eritrea. Ipromise ( talk) 07:11, 29 January 2009 (UTC) reply

Thank you - Joshdboz ( talk) 07:27, 29 January 2009 (UTC) reply

I'm glad to hear that there are articles for this category. My opinion is that, as the category's creator, it is your responsibility to tag those articles so that they appear in the category. Otherwise, after being empty four days, it'll get deleted. - Stepheng3 ( talk) 23:48, 29 January 2009 (UTC) reply

Sorry, I didn't realize that there was a time limit on deleting cats. Joshdboz ( talk) 06:18, 30 January 2009 (UTC) reply

When you create an article on a U.S. ambassador, it would be helpful to also add a link to that article on the page Ambassadors of the United States in the "Ref" column. The links in that column are shortened with a piped link labeled "Ref" so as to keep the column narrow. Thanks. ••• Life of Riley ( talk) 17:54, 31 January 2009 (UTC) reply

Thank you for reminding me. I'm trying to go through the whole lot of ambassador related things (which is quite a mess in places) and hadn't gotten around to that page. Joshdboz ( talk) 18:32, 31 January 2009 (UTC) reply

I have been trying to keep on top of it also, but it's a busy time right now. With the change of administration, all of the politically appointed ambassadors are out and the chargés or DCMs are in charge of embassies now. In the next few months we will have a whole new crop of ambassadors. Every time an ambassador changes, there are four or five pages that need to be updated:

• Ambassadors of the United States
• The ambassador page for the particular nation
• The biography of the outgoing ambassador, if it exists
• The biography of the incominging ambassador, it it exists
• The article "<nation>–United States relations", which usually lists ambassadors
• Possibly your Template:Ambassadors of the United States (?)

••• Life of Riley ( talk) 20:20, 31 January 2009 (UTC) reply

There is only that lone Fox News investigation on Israeli/Mossad connection to the 9/11 attacks, most of the mainstream media won't touch it. Do you have any suggestions on how to place this fact in the article, because it was the largest espionage ring in US history larger than the Soviet Union but like I said mainstream media won't touch it. -- M4silent ( talk) 01:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC) reply

Please review WP:VERIFY. If there is no published material on something from reliable sources, it is not included. See especially Exceptional claims require exceptional sources. Claiming Israel had the "largest espionage ring in US history larger than the Soviet Union" is quite exceptional, and needs more than a couple Fox News reports (which were apparently removed by the company itself) and had little other coverage in the press. However, there are perhaps particular aspects of the investigation that can be well sourced, I just haven't done the research. Joshdboz ( talk) 05:44, 1 February 2009 (UTC) reply

Josh...As you know, many concerns were raised at the AfD re:potential length. Not my concern but I might suggest an additional note on the Talk page requesting brevity and conciseness. Set the stage and the actors will play their parts. I plan on watching this article for at least 8 years.-- Buster7 ( talk) 03:29, 2 February 2009 (UTC) reply

• How about a nickname for the extra's that good faith editors will want to add. I just used the term "extracurricular' for a revert about the Chip's bill and former Pres Bush. It seemed to convey the need to stay brief in a non-confrontive way. In no way do I mean to control the editing of other editors. That includes you. My attempt is to assist. Always feel free to comment-- Buster7 ( talk) 06:01, 5 February 2009 (UTC) reply

• BTW...I heard the expression "corporate governance" used re: the $500K.-- Buster7 ( talk) 06:14, 5 February 2009 (UTC) reply

Just go for it. There shouldn't be any hard feelings on an article like this - it's not as if we're writing great prose. Joshdboz ( talk) 08:41, 5 February 2009 (UTC) reply

Hey Josh. I'm sure you have noticed that a fellow editor has joined the "watch" at the Obama Timeline. I'm also sure that Editor:Aldux has the very best of intentions. My concern is that the type of inclusions that he is making is stretching the criteria of what IS included (or is it just my POV about what SHOULD be included?????). He is a bit wordy so far but I have chopped the unnecessary bits and abbreviated his edits. That's not a problem. My apprehension is not of Aldux, per se, but of how far to stretch the Timeline out from Obama (and Biden). My fear is that the article will become overloaded and cluttered with each and every step that each and every cabinet member and their multi-leveled depts make. For instance, the March 9th (Office of Mgmt and Budget) and March 13 (Dept of Justice) edits. I don't think they have a place in the Timeline. I think that as time goes on more and more stretched edits will be made by more and more GFEditors until we are reporting on how many $1 bills the Treasury Dept. made today or what brand of computers the US Bureau of the Census has purchased. I am reaching out to you for feedback. I'll probably visit Alduxs' talk early next week to open communication with him. I think its a great article with really great and lasting and bare-boned potential. I'm glad to be a part of it with you and Editor:Hysteria18. I dont support ownership of articles and I don't get into edit wars. I hope you will agree that the article has the beginnings of an important and most informative look at the Presidency of Barack Obama. I just want people/readers/students to see it and not hide it under the daily Press.-- Buster7 ( talk) 04:13, 14 March 2009 (UTC) reply

Yeah, I agree it is getting a bit overloaded, I need to check out the latest edits. Joshdboz ( talk) 11:28, 14 March 2009 (UTC) reply

Thank you for the editorial assistance that you gave to help improve this article. Keep up the good work as we try to take this article to WP:FA.-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTM) 07:21, 13 February 2009 (UTC) reply

You recently filed a request at Wikipedia:Requested moves to move the page Richard Hallock (epigrapher) to a different title - however your request is either incomplete or has been contested for being controversial, and has been moved to the incomplete and contested proposals section. Requests that remain incomplete will be removed after five days.

Please make sure you have completed all three of the following:

1. Added {{move|NewName}} at the top of the talk page of the page you want moved, replacing "NewName" with the new name for the article. This creates the required template for you there.
2. Added a place for discussion at the bottom of the talk page of the page you want to be moved. This can easily be accomplished by adding {{subst:RMtalk|NewName|reason for move}} to the bottom of the page, which will automatically create a discussion section there.
3. Added {{subst:RMlink|PageName|NewName|reason for move}} to the top of today's section here.

If you need any further guidance, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Requested moves or contact me on my talk page. - JPG-GR ( talk) 21:22, 20 February 2009 (UTC) reply

Please delete upon reciept.....-- Buster7 ( talk) 11:18, 25 February 2009 (UTC) reply

Huh? Joshdboz ( talk) 11:20, 25 February 2009 (UTC) reply

It's just a good morning greeting....thats all...we both were at Timeline at the same time and I thought I would say Hello...-- Buster7 ( talk) 11:24, 25 February 2009 (UTC) reply

Heh, sorry - thanks. Looks good so far. I guess we can add some pics as we go long (maybe Brown visit, etc). Joshdboz ( talk) 11:25, 25 February 2009 (UTC) reply

yea ...I agree---looks great!-- Buster7 ( talk) 11:54, 25 February 2009 (UTC) reply

Dear Joshdboz

I have presented a proposal to remove the State of the Union Address template from Barack Obama speech to Joint session of Congress, 2009, and to withdraw the article from the State of the Union Addresses category. Since you added the template, I thought it best to notify you of my idea as a result: [5] Allventon ( talk) 02:24, 26 February 2009 (UTC) reply

Why did you revert my edit to the SOTU template? You did not provide any information in the edit comment, nor did you start a discussion on the matter. — Gordon P. Hemsley→ ✉ 14:36, 26 February 2009 (UTC) reply

You are right, I apologize not doing so. A different layout for the template could be interesting (perhaps even with names, or those delivered in person/by text) but I didn't quite see the logic in the way you had broken up the dates by 20 year blocks interspaced with 4 year blocks, right? Joshdboz ( talk) 14:42, 26 February 2009 (UTC) reply

Actually, I broke it up into 25-year blocks. It just so happens that the first and last blocks were shorter than 25 years. Unless... perhaps you have a smaller screen and you were actually seeing wrap-around? I suppose that's a possibility. But there has to be a better way than just a continuous list of years that gets wrapped at random intervals.... — Gordon P. Hemsley→ ✉ 15:07, 26 February 2009 (UTC) reply

Gotcha, heh, that was dumb. It was my screen. Definitely a good idea to break it down by 20/25 year chunks, sorry about the confusion. Joshdboz ( talk) 15:20, 26 February 2009 (UTC) reply

Ross was discussed as not being significant. He is the first state champion and amateur bowler from Santa Claus, Indiana. There is no information online about him due to the significance of his accomplishments and the information I have obtained have been from direct interviews and knowing Ross for the past 10 years. As well as from local newspapers, school newsleters, and IBCA newsleters to members. He is significant enough to have an encyclopedia page do to the small culture of Santa Claus and the significance of bowling with in the area and Indiana as a whole. To publish a page on an up and coming bowler was something I hoped to do to spark more interest in the sport and give Ross credit for his accomplishments as being the first amateur/professional bowler from Santa Claus.

Mexican911 ( talk) 17:10, 28 February 2009 (UTC) reply

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Yosef Alon, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Article about a person notable for only one event (see WP:BIO1E)

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also " What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{ dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Get to know me!} / _{Talk to me!}←at≈:→ 16:41, 2 March 2009 (UTC) reply

On March 15, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 2004 Democratic National Convention keynote address, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass ( talk) 13:13, 15 March 2009 (UTC) reply

Hello Joshbodz, I have granted your account rollback in accordance with your request. Please remember that rollback is for reverting vandalism/spam, and that misuse of the tool, either by revert-warring with other users, or simply reverting edits you disagree with, can lead to it being removed. For practice, you may wish to see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback. Good luck. Acalamari 17:05, 16 March 2009 (UTC) reply

FWIW.....great response from a fellow editor...

Thanks for your edit to the subject article. I did a little pruning to keep it in accordance with some necessary guidelines that have been set-up regarding brevity.. If you consider all the people that are in attendance when President Obama meets a fellow head of state or high ranking foreign dignatary you can understand why I removed the aide. And, we are trying our best to keep away from the "why" of meetings, etc as they are very well reported in the media and other articles and only open the door for political comment.-- Buster7 ( talk) 02:12, 18 March 2009 (UTC) reply

Oh, that's perfectly fine. I was tentative adding it at all because I had no idea what the guidelines were. Therequiembellishere ( talk) 02:05, 18 March 2009 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Assimil.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk) 01:33, 8 April 2009 (UTC) reply

US Airways Flight 1549 looks good enough for an FA nom. talk about community work. Maybe you should nominate it? Res Mar 00:27, 11 May 2009 (UTC) reply

Happy Memorial Day.....

.....-- Buster7 ( talk) 17:39, 24 May 2009 (UTC) reply

No wonder I don't see you at the timeline. Your one busy guy! Timeline seems to have a good pace and life to it. There are some editors that add on a daily basis. I watch and "weed whack" a bit. But not to much really. With all the problems that other Obama pages are experiencing, I'm proud that Timeline is peaceful and calm. And it should be a model for articles that were almost deleted but were saved from the trash pile. You had the initial Idea for it and you saved its life soon after birth. Thanks and congrats on your continued editing.-- Buster7 ( talk) 16:27, 17 July 2009 (UTC) reply

Greetings...Mr Helal is not "a chief interpreter" at the State Dept; I do not know what possessed the BBC to write that. That title belongs to someone else--nor has it ever belonged to Mr Helal.

Thanks for doing a writeup of a contemporary interpreter, the first I have seen.

Herseyp ( talk) 07:05, 18 July 2009 (UTC) reply

^[1]

I'm not a specialist in wikipolicy, but it seems to me like he scans his own patches and uploads it to wikicommons for public use, so I just used it. Flayer ( talk) 14:11, 1 August 2009 (UTC) reply

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing.

Please try discussion instead of disruptively reverting a third time. If necessary, dispute resolution can be sought. 76.69.228.174 ( talk) 05:17, 20 August 2009 (UTC) reply

The Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter
The Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter Issue 1 (September 2009) Content News and announcements Want ads Feature: Article rescue as a team effort Featured editor: MichaelQSchmidt

I'm familiar with the discussion and it does not change the status of my move in any way, nor does my move have anything to do with the "State of the Union" debate. Please pay close attention to the new title. My move properly disambiguates the title, because in approximately ten minutes, there will be a second joint session speech for 2009. If you don't understand why I moved the article or my response on your talk page, please say so and I will explain it in another way. Thanks. Viriditas ( talk) 23:49, 9 September 2009 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Article Rescue Squadron member. ;-) I see the newsletter I helped write on your talk page above.

Would you consider redirecting this article to Majeerteen right now? The article is obvious not notable in its current form, so this material can be removed right now, with only a redirect remaining. I could redirect the page right now for you and close the Afd. Please let me know as soon as possible, because as soon as someone else comments on the AfD, they must agree also before I can redirect the article and close the AFD. Ikip ( talk) 19:22, 11 September 2009 (UTC) reply

		The Special Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to Joshdboz, for his ability to comprimise and seek peace. You are a true asset to the project, and I think I speak for all editors, in that it has been a pleasure to work with you. Ikip ( talk) 21:25, 11 September 2009 (UTC) reply

Heh, thank you, I'm always happy to entertain good ideas. Joshdboz ( talk) 22:32, 12 September 2009 (UTC) reply

Hi Joshdboz. I have been working for some months on the articles relating to recipients of the Israel Prize in order to bring a measure of consistency to such articles. I note that you have recently made changes to the article on Shaul Avigur by combining, under the “References” caption, the reference(s) cited in the article as well as a related works that lack an inline citation. “References” should consist of on-line citations (see WP:footers), otherwise they should appear as “Further reading”, “External links” or some other appropriate designation. If text (presumably in this instance in the “Biography” section,) is based upon the related works, there should be an on-line citation or citations identifying the appropriate text. Davshul ( talk) 16:29, 16 September 2009 (UTC) reply

Hi Joshdboz. Thanks for your response. Please see the comment on my discussion page. Davshul ( talk) 19:07, 16 September 2009 (UTC) reply

simple every prez can give 4 or 8 sotu.read the us consitution. 2009 is not a SOTU

On September 27, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ilyas Kashmiri (militant), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page ( here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass ( talk) 15:42, 27 September 2009 (UTC) 20:42, 27 September 2009 (UTC) reply

Hi - I saw that you have done a lot of work on this page. Unfortunately, anon IPs insist on substituting the word "terrorist" for "militant." I have reverted once, but don't feel like engaging in an edit war.-- RDavi404 ( talk) 00:59, 21 October 2009 (UTC) reply

I added one of the sources i read to the talk page. XavierGreen ( talk) 16:12, 1 October 2009 (UTC) reply

Why are you so obsessed with saying the biased Indian view is correct but quick to condemn the Pakistani view of things?

The article contained a lot of very bad propaganda, totally unproven, and as is typical with the Hindu Mafia on Wikipedia, they will throw in random comments backed by third-rate Indian newspapers.

I pointed to TWO sources - one Pakistani, and one Indian, regarding how Afghanistan is used as a terrorist training ground by India to infiltrate Pakistani territory, and that is one of the primary reasons why India has a vested interest in continuing its development projects in India. Further, I outlined that there was ZERO evidence linking Pakistan to these terrorist attacks, and if you read the article you will see that the FACT is that India ALWAYS blames Pakistan for EVERYTHING. If the toilet seats in Mumbai smell, they will say it's an ISI conspiracy.

You found it fairly simple to delete mine and warn me like some "big man" who thinks he knows something about current affairs in that part of the world, and then you ignore wholesale propaganda additions by the Indian mafia.

I know Israelis and and many Jews worship India because of how anti-Muslim most Indians are, but is your allegiance so high that you must engage in the act of destroying dissenting views? What's the point of consensus and collaboration if you favor one narrative over another?

If Indians can quote random INDIAN sources that ISI is behind any and every attack, why can't a Pakistani or an American such as myself quote INDIAN sources that talk about how India is indeed a terrorist country that funds external terrorism and has been doing so for many years and that is why the Indian Embassy may have been attacked, and that is why India continues to fund so-called "projects" in the country - not because of some benevolency the Indians on Wikipedia are fabricating, but because it is indeed central to India's state-sponsored terrorism?

Even the two sources the Indians have quoted are Ultra Indian Nationalists. They cleverly attempted to hide the Indian origin of these so-called "Analysts" by not writing their entire first names. Do you even bother to read what Indians write so long as it is pro-India (hence Pro-Jew and Pro-Israel from your perspective?)

The current article is a joke after the "Responsibility" section - it's a typical Indian smear campaign run to propagate opinion as fact, even after I made edits to it, you WARNED ME, but you DID NOT WARN the INDIAN that changed it back to terrible propaganda.

Please grow up and stop "WARNING" me, because it only continues to show how biased you are.

Now chances are you won't be MAN enough to even talk about this issue and will delete it, in that case I'll be sure to raise a stink about it with the Wikimedia Foundation for your biased and selective "warnings" and your bias towards allowing Indian propagandists to run loose with ridiculously untrue statements.

There is ZERO evidence ISI or Pakistan has ANYTHING to do with the Indian Embassy attack, and further, there are geostrategic reasons why India continues to "develop" Afghanistan - not some random "OUR RELATIONS ARE GOOD AND HAVE ALWAYS BEEN GOOD" that the India propaganda machine is pushing.

You are a terrible editor, but that's ok, warn me all you want, it only shows how incredibly biased you are Mr. Josh. Grow up and learn to accept dissent. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.242.99.182 ( talk) 02:58, 10 October 2009 (UTC) reply

You are receiving this message either because you received a similar one before and didn't object, or you requested to receive a similar one in the future.

There is a planning discussion taking place here for DC Meetup #9. If you don't wish to receive this message again, please let me know. --NBahn ( talk) 04:57, 20 November 2009 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Omega Performance, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ^Bongo _matic 23:42, 1 December 2009 (UTC) reply

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:2009 Afghan presidential debate.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 13:55, 2 December 2009 (UTC) reply

• You are receiving this message either because you received a similar one before and didn't object, or you requested to receive a similar one in the future. If you don't wish to receive this message again, then please let me know either on my talk page or here.
• Planning — for the most part, anyway — is now finished (see here) for DC Meetup #9.

--NBahn ( talk) 02:39, 10 December 2009 (UTC) reply

Thank you for catching the spelling errors in this section.-- CreativeSoul7981 ( talk) 16:23, 2 January 2010 (UTC) reply

Hello Joshdboz! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 4 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 950 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{ unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Shlomo Gazit - Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Yehoshua Saguy - Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. David Bar-Tov - Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
4. Yosef Mishlav - Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!-- DASHBot ( talk) 22:01, 8 January 2010 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:FIDF Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk) 07:15, 9 January 2010 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Yitzhak Gershon.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{ di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 ( talk) 00:53, 10 January 2010 (UTC) reply

Thank you very much for the barnstar - my first :-). Quite a lot of the events are from the JFK Library WH Diary, and others are just major events I could think of. I based the article's format on the Timeline of the Presidency of Barack Obama article you created. Thanks again. -- Jatkins ^{( talk - contribs)} 17:01, 18 January 2010 (UTC) reply

The Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter Issue 2 (January 2010) Previous issue | Next issue

Content

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. I have found some concerns with the article which you can see at Talk:Commission to Assess the Ballistic Missile Threat to the United States/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells ( talk) 16:41, 24 January 2010 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Ehud Shani.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{ di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Hammersoft ( talk) 15:04, 28 January 2010 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Ehud Shani.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hammersoft ( talk) 15:04, 28 January 2010 (UTC) reply

On 16 February 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Abdul Ghani Baradar, which you created, substantially updated, and single-handedly wrote. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

-- tariqabjotu 16:25, 16 February 2010 (UTC) reply

Thanks alot for the appreciation, you can always trust BBC News and thanks for merging the refrences, I had no idea you could do that. 90.203.13.219 ( talk) 19:10, 16 February 2010 (UTC) reply

Are you sure this is not Abdul Ghani Baradar's picture ?  Jon Ascton   (talk) 17:01, 17 February 2010 (UTC) reply

Thats a cropped version of File:Mohammedomar.jpg which is stated to be a picture of omar. Nice catch Josh. username 1 ( talk) 17:17, 17 February 2010 (UTC) reply

Actually, I think there's even some dispute about whether or not that really is Omar. Anyway, this article states that "No pictures of Baradar have ever been published...". Joshdboz ( talk) 18:35, 17 February 2010 (UTC) reply

Just a reminder, the page you recently created, ARGUS-IS, needs categories. Take care. Tinton5 ( talk) 04:05, 20 February 2010 (UTC) reply

Thanks. Joshdboz ( talk) 04:17, 20 February 2010 (UTC) reply

When I invoke WP:BRD, I mean "bring this up on talk and let's have a discussion". The reason for my revert is that I object to the edit. It thus doesn't have consensus.

The problem with it, as I explained in brief in my edit summary, is that Latin American organisations frequently make declarations supporting the Argentine side in these disputes. We don't need to report this over and over, any more than we need to report every time Hugo Chavez condemns the United States, or every time someone suggests that the Iraq War was illegal. If we did report it every single time, the article would not have much space for anything else. Pfainuk talk 22:06, 23 February 2010 (UTC) reply

Thanks for helping us improve wikipedia.

-- TonyTheTiger ( T/ C/ BIO/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:FOUR) 17:27, 9 April 2010 (UTC) reply

You may be interested to know that a user is refusing to consider your earlier comment at Talk:North-West Frontier Province as still valid because you have not commented there in the last few days: you may wish to comment to clarify your current position. Best, Knepflerle ( talk) 23:04, 27 April 2010 (UTC) reply

• You are receiving this message either because you received a similar one before and didn't object, or you requested to receive a similar one in the future. If you don't wish to receive this message again, then please let me know either on my talk page or here.
  
• Please be advised that planning is now underway (see here) for DC Meetup #10. --NBahn ( talk) 15:20, 7 May 2010 (UTC) reply

I see you've done a lot of great work. Kudos. Just a comment on TK. I was frankly taken aback by your commemt that you've rarely seen opposition to the use of the word assassination in place of/synonymous with regard to targeted killings by Israel. Frankly, in the first place, I pointed editors to the #1 book on the subject by an academic -- the Georgetown Law professor, and that is totally at odds with your impression. Similarly, I provided a quote from one of the foremost U.S. jurists of our lifetime, and that was at odds. Even more odd is that I found a great deal of Israeli writing that raised the same point (which I didn't bother to reflect ... at least as of yet; perhaps I should). Furthermore, the definition of the term as it is used in international law is definitely negative (even moreso that the colloquial use), but even the colloquial use is negative -- one is ipso facto illegal (murder); the other, not. Furthermore, the U.S. I might point out views assassination as illegal, but targeted killing as legal, and carefully describes the difference between the two. So I guess bottom line, have perused much of what is out there on the subject that one can access on google, let alone what I know of international law, given your good background I found your comment surprising. I must say I didnt see a more prominent US academic with a contrary view, or a more prominent US jurist, and the view was even more pronounced among the Israeli scholars and jurists. I guess I would urge you to look at the examples I gave, which must not be what you've seen, and give it another think. If you have the time. And inclination. Best. (Note -- we don't have to decide that it is A or not -- just that a significant enough body of thinkers say it is not A, that it should not be a subsection in A, but rather an article of its own. I can't see the harm, and see a benefit.-- Epeefleche ( talk) 16:36, 13 May 2010 (UTC) reply

Thanks, I was merely commenting on my experience on Wikipedia and the usage I've seen in the popular press (most English-language Israeli press freely used "assassination" when talking about Mahmoud al-Mabhouh), and from that perspective, I don't think there's any reason for us to avoid the use of "assassination" synonymously with "targeted killing", at least in most cases. That said, if there is substantial literature that tries to distinguish between the two, I wouldn't be opposed to a separate article on TK. I'd be interested in reading it myself. Joshdboz ( talk) 19:04, 13 May 2010 (UTC) reply

Thanks. I linked at my first comment to a few such. The first and last are probably the best academic (other than perhaps Dershowitz) and jurist that I've seen write on the topic, and they address this point rather directly. Also, if you would, take a look at my abortion analogy. Finally, there was some conversation in Israel as to what to call it, and I believe the government position was "targeted killing" (in English), but there were even tortured (in Hebrew) suggestions such as phrase meaning something like "killing to defend citizens of the state from being killed". Which didn't fly. Are you reading the JP, or Haaretz? And oh -- if after reading the literature you do believe that it says what I indicate it says, if you could indicate your view on that discussion that would be great. I actually think it could be a great article, with many different viewpoints.-- Epeefleche ( talk) 19:09, 13 May 2010 (UTC) reply

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles ( talk) 17:39, 15 June 2010 (UTC) reply

The issue of whether WP:BLPNAME should be revised has come up again. As you participated in a previous discussion on this guideline, you are invited to contribute your views at " Wikipedia talk:Biographies of living persons#Concrete proposals". — Cheers, JackLee ^{– talk–} 13:39, 28 June 2010 (UTC) reply

The article Hezi Levi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only ref is a dead link, article indicates no other claim to notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{ dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{ dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Marcus Qwertyus ^{( signs his posts)} 16:00, 8 July 2010 (UTC) reply

I didn't nominate this. Marcus Qwertyus ^{( signs his posts)} 16:00, 8 July 2010 (UTC) reply

Dear Joshdboz, thank you for your kind message on my talk page. I really appreciate hearing feedback regarding my edits. I am glad you liked the work I did on Dard people. If you don't mind me asking, is your current research on the Dards? What makes you interested in them? I look forward to hearing from you soon. With regards, Anupam ^Talk 22:20, 13 July 2010 (UTC) reply

Hey, just in case you missed it, there is an oppurtunity to get a free dinner this Tuesday August 11 and a chance to meet and hang out talk about Wikipedia:WikiProject United States Public Policy and WP:GLAM/SI. Sorry that this is so late in the game, I was hoping the e-mail would be a better form of contact for active members (if you want to get on the e-mail list send me an User e-mail ). Hope that you can attend, User:Sadads ( talk)12:07, 9 August 2010 (UTC) reply

An off-wiki discussion is taking place concerning DC Meetup #12. Watch this page for announcements.
—NBahn ( talk) 04:34, 9 September 2010 (UTC) reply

P.S. You are receiving this message either because you received a similar one before and didn't object, or you requested to receive a similar one in the future. If you don't wish to receive this message again, then please let me know either on my talk page or here.

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:David Ben Ba'ashat.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 15:48, 16 September 2010 (UTC) reply

You are invited to Wikipedia DC Meetup #12 on Saturday, October 23, 6pm at Bertucci's in Foggy Bottom. Special guests at this meetup will include Wikimedia CTO Danese Cooper, other Wikimedia technical staff and volunteer developers who will be in DC for Hack-A-Ton DC. Please RSVP on the meetup page.

You can remove your name from the Washington DC Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/DC/Invite/List.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot ( talk) 02:06, 18 October 2010 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Eldon Bargewell.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 16:00, 5 November 2010 (UTC) reply

You are invited to Wikipedia DC Meetup #13 on Wednesday, November 17, from 7 to 9 pm, location to be determined (but near a Metro station in DC).

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can join the mailing list.

You can remove your name from future notifications of Washington DC Meetups by editing this page: Wikipedia:Meetup/DC/Invite/List.
BrownBot ( talk) 13:42, 7 November 2010 (UTC) reply

Thank you for uploading File:Gadi Eizenkot.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 19:03, 28 November 2010 (UTC) reply

Thank you for uploading File:Eyal Ben-Reuven.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 19:03, 28 November 2010 (UTC) reply

The article Eyal Ben-Reuven has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

subject of questionable notability; orphaned article unedited for content since September 2008.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Krakatoa Katie 06:15, 6 December 2010 (UTC) reply

It is almost the New Year over at Timeline of the Presidency of Barack Obama (2010). I thought you might enjoy turning the calendar for the new year and creating Timeline-2011. Buster Seven Talk 23:00, 15 December 2010 (UTC) reply

• There is a discussion that you may be interested in at Talk:Timeline of the Presidency of Barack Obama (2009). Your input would be appreciated. Buster Seven Talk 15:35, 10 January 2011 (UTC) reply

You are invited to WikiXDC, a special meetup event and celebration on Saturday, January 22 hosted by the National Archives and Records Administration in downtown Washington, D.C.

• Date: January 22, 2011 (tentatively 9:30 AM - 5 PM)
• Location: National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), downtown building, Pennsylvania Avenue & 7th St NW.
• Description: There will be a behind-the-scenes tour of the National Archives and you will learn more about what NARA does. We will also have a mini-film screening featuring FedFlix videos along with a special message from Jimmy Wales. In the afternoon, there will be lightning talks by Wikimedians ( signup to speak), wiki-trivia, and cupcakes to celebrate!
• Details & RSVP: Details about the event are on our Washington, DC tenwiki page.

Please RSVP soon as possible, as there likely will be a cap on number of attendees that NARA can accommodate.

---

Note: You can unsubscribe from DC meetup notices by removing your name at Wikipedia:Meetup/DC/Invite/List. BrownBot ( talk) 02:04, 7 January 2011 (UTC) reply

1. At WikiXDC in January, User:Harej proposed that DC submit a bid to host Wikimania 2012. A bid and organizing committee is being formed and seeks additional volunteers to help. Please look at our bid page and sign up if you want to help out. You can also signup for the bid team's email list.
2. To support the Wikimania bid, more events like WikiXDC, and outreach activities like collaborations with the Smithsonian (ongoing) and National Archives, there also has been discussion of forming Wikimedia DC, as an official Wikimedia chapter. You can express interest and contribute to chapter discussions on the Wikimedia DC Meta-Wiki pages.
3. To discuss all this and meet up with special guest, Dutch Wikipedian User:Kim Bruning, there will be a meetup, Wikipedia:Meetup/DC 16 this Tuesday at 7pm, at Capitol City Brewery, Metro Center. There will be a pre-meetup Wikimania team meeting at 6pm at the same location.

Apologies for the short notice for this meetup, but let's discuss when, where & what for DC Meetup #17. Also, if you haven't yet, please join wikimedia-dc mailing list to stay informed. Cheers, User:Aude ( talk)

---

Note: You can unsubscribe from DC meetup notices by removing your name at Wikipedia:Meetup/DC/Invite/List. -- Message delivered by AudeBot, on behalf of User:Aude

A tag has been placed on Communispond requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ► Philg88 ◄ ^talk 01:14, 24 April 2011 (UTC) reply

The next DC Wikimedia meetup is scheduled for Saturday, May 7, 3:30-5:30 pm at the Tenleytown Library (adjacent to the Tenleytown Metro Station, Red Line), followed by dinner & socializing at some nearby place.

This is the first official meeting of our proposed Wikimedia DC chapter, with discussion of bylaws and next steps. Other agenda items include, update everyone on our successful Wikimania bid and next steps in the planning process, discuss upcoming activities that we want to do over the summer and fall, and more.

Please RSVP here and see a list of additional tentatively planned meetups & activities for late May & June on the Wikipedia:Meetup/DC page.

---

Note: You can unsubscribe from DC meetup notices by removing your name at Wikipedia:Meetup/DC/Invite/List. -- Message delivered by AudeBot, on behalf of User:Aude

I see that you have done a lot of work on United States ambassador articles in Wikipedia, including the ambassador template. I have created a new article: United States Ambassador to Barbados and the Eastern Caribbean to list the countries for this ambassadorial post and provide the official title of the ambassador. This article may be useful to you. Regards, ••• Life of Riley ( T– C) 23:11, 21 May 2011 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:The First Fighter Squadron.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 05:08, 13 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Archives of American Art Backstage Pass! - You are invited!

The Smithsonian is hosting its first Backstage Pass at the Archives of American Art in, Washington, D.C., on Friday, July 29. 10 Wikimedians will experience the behind the scenes aspects of archiving the world's largest collection of documents and photographs related to American art. After a complimentary lunch, an edit-a-thon will take place and prizes will be awarded. Followed by an evening happy hour. We hope you'll participate! SarahStierch ( talk) 14:15, 16 July 2011 (UTC) reply

The first ever WikiProject National Archives newsletter has been published. Please read on to find out what we're up to and how to help out! There are many opportunities for getting more involved. Dominic· t 21:29, 20 July 2011 (UTC) reply

The WikiProject National Archives Newsletter July 2011 News Featured article contest This week, our first multilingual featured article contest was announced. We are aiming to improve the articles on the Declaration of Independence, Constitution, or Bill of Rights to featured or good status in English and other languages. Prizes for winners will be a gift package from the National Archives including a book of your choice or a tote bag, and other swag, plus, of course, a special barnstar. August 6 backstage pass Plans are in the works for a meetup and backstage pass event at the National Archives II facility in College Park, MD. There will be a regular social meetup, a discussion with Dominic about WP:NARA, a tour of the building by NARA staff, and then time for a scanathon and editathon in the research rooms and library until the building closes at 5 pm. Keep your schedules open! From our recent uploads: ...see more. Special requests: This section includes special requests from the NARA staff: Archival Recovery Team The National Archives' Archival Recovery Team (ART) is a team of law enforcement agents and archivists who investigate NARA's lost and stolen documents. They have received media attention ( [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]) and would like to request an article be written for the team, if Wikipedians deem it notable. It is hoped that making more information about the group available on Wikipedia will increase public awareness of the documents they are seeking to recover. Ongoing Today's Document challenge The Today's Document challenge is an opportunity for Wikipedians to get their work related to National Archives holdings spotlighted on Archives.gov and the National Archives' tumblr. Each day the National Archives selects a document related to the day's date to showcase. The goal is to get articles related to the selected documents on the main page in ""Did You Know...?" the same day that the National Archives features the document. Alternatively, other appropriate articles related to National Archives holdings not already selected will be used for new documents of the day by NARA staff and posted to their tumblr. Wikisource WP:NARA has a sister WikiProject on Wikisource, WS:NARA. On Wikisource, editors transcribe, proofread, and arrange documents. This helps to make little-known documents more discoverable, or well-known documents more searchable, and improves accessibility. See the files being worked on. If you are new to Wikisource and would like to participate, there are experienced Wikisourcerors willing to be mentors. New contributions A list of some recent contributions to the project: Wikipedia District of Columbia Compensated Emancipation Act ( Fetchcomms) Court of the Patriarchs ( CutOffTies) Opposition to the overthrow of the Hawaiian Kingdom ( Fetchcomms) Wikisource1 Memorial of Queen Liliuokalani in relation to the Crown lands of Hawaii Petition from women of Brookline Resolutions of the Joint Committee on the Washington Monument H. R. 4982 A Petition For Universal Suffrage Susan B. Anthony petition for remission of fine Alexander Hamilton's commission to take rank as Colonel 1Credit goes to Prosody, Theornamentalist, Inductiveload, Digipoke, George Orwell III, Kathleen.wright5, BirgitteSB, and Zhaladshar Tools Archives.gov grabber ( Slakr) Future plans Major image contribution The National Archives has hundreds of thousands of digitized documents in its holdings. We are working on a bulk upload to Commons of one particular cache of about 123,000 TIFF master files in the next few days! Once uploaded, these will require a massive community effort to help categorize the files on Commons and add them to articles on Wikipedia or transcribe them on Wikisource. Inclusion in the online catalog We are currently working on a system for including links to pages on Wikimedia projects in the National Archives online catalog. The Wikimedia projects are hosting an increasing number of transcriptions of National Archives documents and high-quality image and video files that are not available through NARA's own site. Links to these Wikimedia pages in the documents' actual catalog records will benefit the end user by providing them access to further resources about the documents, and they will also demonstrate the National Archives commitment to supporting Wikimedians' efforts. To stop receiving this newsletter, please remove your name from the list.

DC Meetup 21 - Who should come? You should. Really.
	DC MEETUP 21 is July 29! This meet up will involve Wikipedians from the area as well as Wiki-loving GLAM professionals. See you Friday! SarahStierch ( talk) 16:32, 25 July 2011 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on EarthFrisk.org, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- Transity^{( talk • contribs)} 18:53, 26 July 2011 (UTC) reply

National Archives Backstage Pass - Who should come? You should. Really.
	On Saturday, August 6, the National Archives is hosting a Wikipedia meetup, backstage pass tour, and edit-a-thon in College Park, Maryland. Meet staff and fellow Wikipedians, go behind the scenes at the National Archives, help digitize documents, and edit together! Dominic· t 21:27, 28 July 2011 (UTC) reply

National Archives Backstage Pass - Who should come? You should. Really.
	You are invited to the National Archives in College Park for a special backstage pass and scanathon meetup with Archivist of the United States David Ferriero, on Saturday, October 8. Go behind the scenes and into the stacks at the National Archives, help digitize documents, and edit together! Free catered lunch provided! Dominic· t 16:17, 29 September 2011 (UTC) reply

Fine Art Edit-a-Thon & Meetup - Who should come? You should. Really.

FINE ART EDIT-A-THON & DC MEETUP 26 is December 17! The Edit-a-Thon will cover fine art subjects from the Federal Art Project and the meet up will involve Wikipedians from the area as well as Wiki-loving GLAM professionals. You don't have to attend both to attend one (but we hope you do!) Click the link above and sign up & spread the word! See you there! SarahStierch ( talk) 17:32, 26 November 2011 (UTC) reply

You are invited to the National Archives ExtravaSCANza, taking place every day next week from January 4–7, Wednesday to Saturday, in College Park, Maryland (Washington, DC metro area). Come help me cap off my stint as Wikipedian in Residence at the National Archives with one last success! This will be a casual working event in which Wikipedians are getting together to scan interesting documents at the National Archives related to a different theme each day—currently: spaceflight, women's suffrage, Chile, and battleships—for use on Wikipedia/Wikimedia Commons. The event is being held on multiple days, and in the evenings and weekend, so that as many locals and out-of-towners from nearby regions1 as possible can come. Please join us! Dominic· t 01:23, 30 December 2011 (UTC) reply 1 Wikipedians from DC, Baltimore, Philadelphia, Newark, New York City, and Pittsburgh have been invited.

Thanks for uploading File:The Hammers Squadron.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{ helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot ( talk) 06:15, 27 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter Volume I, Issue III February 2012 Front cover | Feature | News and announcements | Humor | Want ads To contribute to the next newsletter, please visit the Newsletter draft page. ARS Members automatically receive this newsletter. To opt out, please remove your name from the recipients list.

Who should come? You should. Really.
	She Blinded Me with Science: Smithsonian Women in Science Edit-a-Thon will be held on Friday, March 30, 2012 at the Smithsonian Archives in Washington, D.C. This edit-a-thon will focus on improving and writing Wikipedia content about women from the Smithsonian who contributed to the sciences. It will be followed by a happy hour meetup! We look forward to seeing you there!

Sarah ( talk) 22:59, 7 March 2012 (UTC) reply

Please join us for a Wikimedia DC Meetup & Dinner on Saturday, May 5. This will be a great opportunity to meet other Wikimedians from the DC area, discuss upcoming Wikimedia DC activities and events, and have fun over dinner and drinks. All ages are welcome! Kirill  [talk] 04:03, 18 April 2012 (UTC) reply

Please join us for the second Smithsonian Institution Archives Edit-a-thon! This event will focus on Smithsonian history including the history of the Institution's museums, archives, research centers and the people behind them. This will be a great opportunity to learn about the Archives, work within them & with staff, and learn more about the world's largest museum complex. We hope you'll join us on Friday, May 25. Please sign up here! Sarah ( talk) 21:46, 7 May 2012 (UTC) reply Note: You received this message because you were listed here. If you no longer wish to receive messages of this nature, please remove yourself from that list.

"Masterpiece Museum" Edit-a-Thon at the Smithsonian American Art Museum

The Smithsonian American Art Museum and Wikimedia DC present the "Masterpiece Museum" Edit-a-Thon. Drawing from their vast vaults of art, the caretakers of the Smithsonian American Art Museum have meticulously drawn forth canvas jewels to import into Wikimedia Commons and Wikipedia articles. The museum directors and staff are excited about this project, and would love to have experienced Wikimedians help in the effort! Kirill  [talk] 18:02, 29 July 2012 (UTC) reply When August 10, 2012, 10 AM - 4 PM Where Smithsonian American Art Museum, 7th & F St NW, Washington, DC Signup Details & signup

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Indian century is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indian century until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mar4d ( talk) 14:37, 28 August 2012 (UTC) reply

Backstage at the Smithsonian Libraries is part of Wikipedia Loves Libraries 2012, the second annual continent-wide campaign to bring Wikipedia and libraries together with on-site events. Running this fall through October and November, libraries (and archives) will open their doors to help build a lasting relationship with their local Wikipedian community.

Organized by Wikimedia DC, this event will take place on October 12, 2012, and will include new editor training, a "backstage pass" tour of the National Museum of Natural History, and an edit-a-thon. Everyone is welcome to attend!

Kirill  ^[talk] 18:45, 10 September 2012 (UTC) reply

The article Indian century has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The page presents a topic which is quiet irrelevant or just speculation.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Akhil Bharathan ( talk) 06:16, 28 September 2012 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Indian century is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indian century (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mar4d ( talk) 13:50, 1 October 2012 (UTC) reply

Happy Thanksgiving, Joshdboz!
As we all sit down at the dinner table and say our thanks, I would like to give thanks to you for your wonderful contributions and wish you a very happy Thanksgiving. May your turkey, ham or beast of choice satiate you until next year! TRA! ``` Buster Seven Talk 23:18, 15 November 2012 (UTC) reply

December 10 is Ada Lovelace's birthday! Not only was she the world's first computer programmer, but also the world's first female open source developer! Come celebrate with Wikimedia District of Columbia at Busboys & Poets for an informal get together!

The Washington, DC event will be held on Monday, December 10, 2012 at Busboys & Poets on 5th St NW & K St NW near Mt Vernon Square. The area is easily accessible by the Red Line Chinatown stop and the Yellow Line and Green Line Mt Vernon Square stop, as well as by WMATA buses.

Kirill  ^[talk] 14:18, 10 December 2012 (UTC) reply

Peace is a state of balance and understanding in yourself and between others, where respect is gained by the acceptance of differences, tolerance persists, conflicts are resolved through dialog, peoples rights are respected and their voices are heard, and everyone is at their highest point of serenity without social tension.

Happy Holidays. ``` Buster Seven Talk 15:51, 12 December 2012 (UTC) reply

Please join Wikimedia DC and four other local media nonprofits—the National Press Club's Young Members Committee, 100Reporters, IRE and the Fund for Investigative Journalism—in winding down another year with a night of well-mannered frivolity.

The festivities will take place on Friday evening from 6:30 PM to 9:00 PM in the Zenger Room on the 13th Floor of the National Press Club, located on 529 14th Street NW, near Metro Center. There will be meat and vegetarian appetizers as well as a cash bar with specially reduced drink prices all night long. In addition, we will be exhibiting the finalists of the Wiki Loves Monuments photo contest at the event.

Hope to see you there! Kirill  ^[talk] 04:42, 13 December 2012 (UTC) reply

Just thought I would let you know that the Timelines are alive and well and have been almost 100% vandal-free for 4 years. Your early guidelines seem to still be doing their job. ``` Buster Seven Talk 15:13, 4 January 2013 (UTC) reply

Please join Wikimedia DC for Happy Hour at the Capitol City Brewery at Metro Center on Thursday, February 28 at 6 p.m. All Wikipedia/Wikimedia and free knowledge/culture enthusiasts, regardless of editing experience, are welcome to attend! All ages welcome!

For more information and to sign up, see Wikipedia:Meetup/DC 34. Hope to see you there! Harej ( talk) 02:29, 24 February 2013 (UTC) reply

Hi Joshdboz, since you are interested in meetups in DC, I'd like to invite you to attend the Cato Institute's "Wikipedia and Legislative Data" events on March 14. (There's also an all day workshop on March 15; let me know if you are interested, we may be able to add more people.)

There will be an introduction to Wikipedia and open edit-a-thon in the afternoon, and a Sunshine Week Reception in the evening. I hope you can make it!

• Please sign up here
• Announcement on Cato's blog
• Background from Cato sponsor Jim Harper's perspective
• Background from Wikipedian Pete Forsyth's perspective

Hope to see you there! - Pete ( talk) 19:15, 1 March 2013 (UTC) reply

Please join Wikimedia DC for a social meetup and dinner at Guapo's at Tenleytown-AU on Saturday, March 9 at 5 PM All Wikipedia/Wikimedia and free knowledge/culture enthusiasts, regardless of editing experience, are welcome to attend! All ages welcome!

For more information and to sign up, please see Wikipedia:Meetup/DC 35. Hope to see you there! Kirill  ^[talk] 14:04, 4 March 2013 (UTC) reply

In honor of Women's History Month, the Smithsonian and the National Museum of Women in the Arts are teaming up to organize a Women in the Arts Meetup & Edit-a-thon on Friday, March 29, 2013 from 10:00am - 5:00pm. The event is focused on encouraging women editors while improving Wikipedia entries about women artists and art world figures. This event is free of charge, but participation is limited to 20 volunteers, so RSVP today! Sarasays ( talk) 23:19, 20 March 2013 (UTC) reply

Please join Wikimedia DC for a social meetup and dinner at Vapiano (near Farragut North/Farragut West) on Saturday, April 13 at 5:30 PM All Wikipedia/Wikimedia and free knowledge/culture enthusiasts, regardless of editing experience, are welcome to attend! All ages welcome!

For more information and to sign up, please see Wikipedia:Meetup/DC 36. Hope to see you there! Kirill  ^[talk] 19:09, 10 April 2013 (UTC) reply

The " All Things GW" editathon on Saturday, April 20, 2013 from 12:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. is a rare chance to go behind the scenes in the University Archives of the GW Libraries and use their unique resources to research and update Wikipedia pages related to The George Washington University and the Foggy Bottom neighborhood. Did you miss our last D.C. history editathon? This is your is your chance to come edit with wiki-friends using different great collection! The event includes a behind-the-scenes tour of the University Archives and a show-and-tell of some of its most interesting treasures, snacks, and the editathon.

Participation is limited to 30 volunteers, so RSVP today! Dominic· t 07:22, 15 April 2013 (UTC) reply

Wikimedia DC invites you to join us for two exciting events this weekend:

On the evening of Friday, April 19, we're hosting our first-ever WikiSalon at our K Street office. The WikiSalon will be a twice-monthly informal meetup and collaborative editing event to help build the community of Wikimedia enthusiasts here in DC; please join us for its inaugural session. Light refreshments will be provided.

On Saturday, April 20, we've partnered with the George Washington University to host the All Things GW Edit-a-Thon at the Teamsters Labor History Research Center. Please join us for behind-the-scenes tours of the University Archives and help edit articles about GWU history.

We look forward to seeing you at one or both of these events! Kirill  ^[talk] 20:14, 15 April 2013 (UTC) reply

Please join Wikimedia DC for a social meetup and dinner at Vapiano (near Farragut North/Farragut West) on Saturday, May 11 at 5:30 PM. All Wikipedia/Wikimedia and free knowledge/culture enthusiasts, regardless of editing experience, are welcome to attend! All ages welcome!

For more information and to sign up, please see the meetup page. Hope to see you there! Kirill  ^[talk] 23:14, 7 May 2013 (UTC) reply

Wikimedia DC invites you to join us for our next DC WikiSalon, which will be held on the evening of May 24 at our K Street office.

The WikiSalon an informal gathering of Wikimedia enthusiasts, who come together to discuss the Wikimedia projects and collaboratively edit. There's no set agenda, and guests are welcome to recommend articles for the group to edit or edit on their own. Light refreshments will be provided.

We look forward to seeing you there! Kirill  ^[talk] 18:29, 17 May 2013 (UTC) reply

Join us at the NLM next week, either in person or online, to learn about NLM resources, hear some great speakers, and do some editing!

On Tuesday, 28 May there will be a community Wikipedia meeting at the United States National Library of Medicine in Bethesda, Maryland - with a second on Thursday, 30 May for those who can't make it on Tuesday. You can participate either in-person, or via an online webinar. If you attend in person, USB sticks (but not external drives) are ok to use.

Please go to the event page to get more information, including a detailed program schedule.

If you are interested in participating, please register by sending an email to pmhmeet@gmail.com. Please indicate if you are coming in person or if you will be joining us via the webinar. After registering, you will receive additional information about how to get to our campus (if coming in-person) and details about how to join the webinar. Klortho ( talk) 00:54, 25 May 2013 (UTC) reply

Wikimedia DC invites you to join us for our next DC WikiSalon, which will be held on the evening of Thursday, June 6 at our K Street office.

The WikiSalon an informal gathering of Wikimedia enthusiasts, who come together to discuss the Wikimedia projects and collaboratively edit. There's no set agenda, and guests are welcome to recommend articles for the group to edit or edit on their own. Light refreshments will be provided.

We look forward to seeing you there! Kirill  ^[talk] 12:00, 3 June 2013 (UTC) reply

I'm sorry for the last-minute notice, but on Saturday, June 8, from 3 to 6 PM, Wikimedia DC and the Cato Institute are hosting a Legislative Data Meetup. We will discuss the work done so far by WikiProject U.S. Federal Government Legislative Data to put data from Congress onto Wikipedia, as well as what more needs to be done. If you have ideas you'd like to contribute, or if you're just curious and feel like meeting up with other Wikipedians, you are welcome to come! Be sure to RSVP here if you're interested.

I hope to see you there!

(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for D.C.-area events by removing your name from this list.)

Harej ( talk) 04:48, 6 June 2013 (UTC) reply

Please join Wikimedia DC for a social meetup and dinner at Vapiano (near Farragut North/Farragut West) on Saturday, June 15 at 5:30 PM. All Wikipedia/Wikimedia and free knowledge/culture enthusiasts, regardless of editing experience, are welcome to attend! All ages welcome!

For more information and to sign up, please see the meetup page. Hope to see you there! Kirill  ^[talk] 20:21, 10 June 2013 (UTC) reply

	Great American Wiknic DC at Meridian Hill Park
	You are invited to the Great American Wiknic DC at the James Buchanan Memorial at Meridian Hill Park. We would love to see you there, so sign up and bring something fun for the potluck! :)

Boilerplate message generously borrowed from Wikimedia NYC. To unsubscribe from future DC area event notifications, remove your name from this list.

Harej ( talk) 16:13, 19 June 2013 (UTC) reply

Please join Wikimedia DC for a social meetup and dinner at Vapiano (near Farragut North/Farragut West) on Saturday, July 13 at 6:00 PM. All Wikipedia/Wikimedia and free knowledge/culture enthusiasts, regardless of editing experience, are welcome to attend! All ages welcome!

For more information and to sign up, please see the meetup page. Hope to see you there! Kirill  ^[talk] 00:54, 6 July 2013 (UTC) reply

File:SAAM facade.jpg American Art Museum

Luce and Lunder Edit-a-thon at the Smithsonian American Art Museum You're invited to the Luce and Lunder Edit-a-thon, part of a series of edit-a-thons organized by the Smithsonian American Art Museum to add and expand articles about American art and artists on Wikipedia. This event will include a catered lunch and special tours of the Luce Foundation Center for American Art and the Lunder Conservation Center at the Smithsonian American Art Museum. 9:15 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. on Friday, July 19, 2013 Smithsonian American Art Museum Meet at G Street Lobby (9th St. & G St. NW, Washington, D.C.) Capacity is limited, so please sign up today! If you would not like to receive future messages about meetups, please remove your name from our distribution list. Message delivered by Dominic· t 00:34, 12 July 2013 (UTC). reply

Luce Foundation Center

Please join Wikimedia DC for a social meetup and dinner at Vapiano (near Farragut North/Farragut West) on Saturday, August 24 at 6:00 PM. All Wikipedia/Wikimedia and free knowledge/culture enthusiasts, regardless of editing experience, are welcome to attend! All ages welcome!

For more information and to sign up, please see the meetup page. Hope to see you there! Kirill  ^[talk] 04:34, 8 August 2013 (UTC) reply

Wikimedia DC invites you to join us for our next DC WikiSalon, which will be held on the evening of Wednesday, August 24 at our K Street office.

The WikiSalon an informal gathering of Wikimedia enthusiasts, who come together to discuss the Wikimedia projects and collaboratively edit. There's no set agenda, and guests are welcome to recommend articles for the group to edit or edit on their own. Light refreshments will be provided.

We look forward to seeing you there! Kirill  ^[talk] 12:10, 19 August 2013 (UTC) reply

Are you free on Saturday, September 14? If so, please join Wikimedia DC and local Wikipedians for a social meetup and dinner at Vapiano (near Farragut North/Farragut West) at 6:00 PM. All Wikipedia/Wikimedia and free knowledge/culture enthusiasts, regardless of editing experience, are welcome to attend! All ages are welcome!

For more information and to sign up, please visit the meetup page. Hope to see you there! Kirill  ^[talk] 19:31, 25 August 2013 (UTC) reply

Wikimedia DC invites you to join us for our next WikiSalon, which will be held from 7 to 9 PM on Thursday, September 5 at our K Street office.

The WikiSalon is an informal gathering of Wikimedia enthusiasts, who come together to discuss the Wikimedia projects and collaboratively edit. There's no set agenda, and guests are welcome to recommend articles for the group to edit or edit on their own. Light refreshments will be provided.

We look forward to seeing you there! Kirill  ^[talk] 15:30, 28 August 2013 (UTC) reply

Wikimedia DC invites you to join us for our next WikiSalon, which will be held from 7 to 9 PM on Thursday, September 26 at our K Street office.

The WikiSalon is an informal gathering of Wikimedia enthusiasts, who come together to discuss the Wikimedia projects and collaboratively edit. There's no set agenda, and guests are welcome to recommend articles for the group to edit or edit on their own. Light refreshments will be provided.

We look forward to seeing you there! Kirill  ^[talk] 06:26, 17 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Wikimedia DC invites you to join us for a special WikiSalon at the Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial Library's Digital Commons Center. We will gather at 3 PM on Sunday, October 13, 2013 to discuss an important topic: what can Wikipedia and the DC area do to help each other? We hope to hear your thoughts and suggestions; if you have an idea you would like to pursue, please let us know and we will help!

Following the WikiSalon, we will be having dinner at a nearby restaurant, Ella's Wood Fired Pizza.

If you're interested in attending, please sign up at the event page. We look forward to seeing you there! Kirill  ^[talk] 02:43, 8 October 2013 (UTC) reply

Hey!

You are invited to two upcoming events in DC:

• Meetup at Capitol City Brewery on Saturday, January 25 at 6 PM. Please join us for dinner, drinks, socializing, and discussing Wikimedia DC activities and events. All are welcome! RSVP on the linked page or through Meetup.
• Art and Feminism Edit-a-Thon on Saturday, February 1 from Noon – 5 PM. Join us as we improve articles on notable women in history! All are welcome, regardless of age or level of editing experience. RSVP on the linked page or through Meetup.

I hope to see you there!

(Note: If you do not wish to receive talk page messages for DC meetups, you are welcome to remove your username from this page.)

Harej ( talk) 00:07, 16 January 2014 (UTC) reply

Hello there!

Our February WikiSalon is coming up on Sunday, February 23. Join us at our gathering of Wikipedia enthusiasts at the Kogod Courtyard of the National Portrait Gallery with an optional dinner after. As usual, all are welcome. Care to join us?

Also, if you are available, there is an American Art Edit-a-thon being held at the Smithsonian American Art Museum with Professor Andrew Lih's COMM-535 class at American University on Tuesday, February 11 from 2 to 5 PM. Please RSVP on the linked page if you are interested.

If you have any ideas or preferences for meetups, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Meetup/DC.

Thank you, and hope to see you at our upcoming events! Harej ( talk) 18:41, 4 February 2014 (UTC) reply

— Harej ( talk) 05:10, 3 March 2014 (UTC) reply

(To unsubscribe, remove your username here.) 01:29, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

(To unsubscribe, remove your username here.) 20:38, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Motto of the Day ( WP:MOTD) is in a state of emergency and really needs your help! There are not enough editors who are reviewing or nominating mottos at Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/In review, and this probably means that you will notice a red link or “ This space for rent” as our mottos for the next weeks and months.

Please take a moment to review the nominations and nominate your own new mottos at Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/In review and Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/'Specials. Any help would be appreciated! MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 09:13, 29 April 2014 (UTC) reply

This message has been sent by pjoef on behalf of Motto of the Day to all editors of the English Wikipedia who are showing MOTD's templates on their pages, and to all the participants to MOTD: ( page, template, and category).

(To unsubscribe, remove your username here.) 20:20, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

(To unsubscribe, remove your username here.) 01:41, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

(To unsubscribe, remove your username here.) 21:22, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

(To unsubscribe, remove your username here.) 21:16, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Come one and come all. To a presentation at the Laurel Historical Society about how you can help verify, validate, and edit the information that is on the front line of local history.

• Show the Internet who is the better editor.
• Be the creator of culture that you know you are.
• Spread the knowledge of noteworthy people who no one but you cares about.
• Lead the charge to a better Wikipedia --- eventually.

Geraldshields11 ( talk) 02:08, 6 September 2014 (UTC) reply

See you at the Laurel Pool Room, 9th and Main Street, Laurel, MD on Thursday, September 11, 2014 at 7:00 PM EST. See http://www.meetup.com/Wikimedia-DC/events/205494212/ for more information. Geraldshields11 ( talk) 02:13, 6 September 2014 (UTC) reply

The WikiSalon is a special meetup usually held during the first and third full weeks of every month, from 7 PM to 9 PM. It's an informal gathering of Wikimedia enthusiasts, who come together to discuss Wikimedia wikis and collaboratively edit. There's no set agenda, and guests are welcome to recommend articles for the group to edit or edit on their own.

If you're coming by Metro, the closest station is Dupont Circle (on the Red Line). If you're driving, a lot of parking opens up downtown after 6:30 PM, so finding a parking space (even a free one) should be easy. Once you've found the building, go to Cove on the second floor. We will be in the conference room.

When: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 at 7:00 PM to 9:00 PM

Where: The Cove, Dupont Circle, 1730 Connecticut Avenue NW, 2nd floor, 20009, DC

For more information, see http://www.meetup.com/Wikimedia-DC/events/205500822/

My best regards, Geraldshields11 ( talk) 02:25, 6 September 2014 (UTC) reply

Wikimedia DC's Upcoming meetups

• Thursday, September 11: “Wikipedia and YOUR History: Taking Control of the Internet, One Article at a Time!”

  A presentation at the Laurel Historical Society about how you can help verify, validate, and edit the information that is on the front line of local history. Laurel Pool Room, 9th and Main Street in Laurel, MD. 7 PM.

• Wednesday, September 17: WikiSalon

  Come for the pizza, stay for the conversation. 7 PM – 9 PM

• Saturday, September 20: September Meetup

  Get dinner and drinks with fellow Wikipedians! 6 PM

• Sunday, September 21: Laurel History Edit-a-Thon

  Local history for Wikipedia! 10:15 AM – 4 PM

• Saturday, September 27 – Sunday, September 28: Please RSVP for the Open Government WikiHack at Eventbrite by clicking on the link. The National Archives and Records Administration and Wikimedia DC are teaming up to come up with solutions that help integrate government data into Wikipedia. 10:30 AM – 5 PM each day

My best regards, Geraldshields11 ( talk) 22:49, 6 September 2014 (UTC) reply

(To unsubscribe, remove your username here.) 21:20, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

(To unsubscribe, remove your username here.) 02:22, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

(To unsubscribe, remove your username here.) 03:11, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

(To unsubscribe, remove your username here.) 18:20, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

To unsubscribe from this newsletter, remove your name from this list. 02:25, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

To remove yourself from this mailing list, remove your name from this list. 22:17, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Long time no talk. I just noticed the addition of Charles Jr. to the section on my father's family, and I hate to point out that he never acknowledged this person as his son. In fact, I never knew about him until he called me a couple of Christmasses ago (surprise!) and he has not been in touch since. I'd prefer some of that excellent new DNA testing before taking the claim with no salt added. I don't know if that should be reflected in the article or not.

I suspect my mother's family would be rather surprised at how many times my da was married before her....

Corgi ( talk) 14:24, 25 November 2015 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Fruit & Veg City requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 05:22, 8 July 2017 (UTC) reply

The article Louis Jacoby has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I am proposing deletion of this article due to the subject Louis Jacoby (engraver, not the singer) having little to no secondary coverage from reputable sources. None of his works appear notable enough to possess their own entries, he has won no awards, etc. The entire article hinges on a single source, which is an auction website.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Firstclass306 ( talk) 18:31, 2 July 2019 (UTC) reply

The file File:Patton speech.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 01:03, 6 April 2020 (UTC) reply

Thank you for uploading File:2004 DNC keynote.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 09:00, 13 July 2022 (UTC) reply

jftsang 22:20, 2 January 2023 (UTC) reply

The redirect IMoneyNet has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 24 § IMoneyNet until a consensus is reached. -- Tavix ^{( talk)} 20:02, 24 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Longhornsg ( talk) 21:49, 21 August 2023 (UTC) reply

Longhornsg ( talk) 17:17, 13 September 2023 (UTC) reply

The article Uzi Mahnaimi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:BEFORE shows no indication of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 10:00, 8 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Ali al-Jarrah.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 17:04, 19 March 2024 (UTC) reply