Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:KinitoPET and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing ( talk) 05:54, 13 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello, LlV2! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing ( talk) 05:54, 13 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello. Instead of restoring KinoPET to the Godot article, please discuss on the article's talk page. The list is for notable games, but notability is demonstrated through sources which are both reliable and independent of the game. Blogs and user-generated databases are not generally reliable for this kind of thing. So if you have such sources, it's going to be simpler to just write the article first. If the game isn't notable by itself but is notable as an example of a Godot game, you would need a reliable, independent source to explain why is is specifically notable as an example. Thanks. Grayfell ( talk) 20:01, 13 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Celeste 64: Fragments of the Mountain and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic ( talk) 21:21, 13 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi LIV2,

Welcome to Wikipedia! You've been here for half a week and been going at it pretty enthusiastically! Now, I do not want to temper your excitement, but I have to ask you to please, slow down. As you probably noticed, some over your edits have been reverted. Have you taken a moment to check out Wikipedia's page for new users? You might learn a thing or two!

You seem to be interested in video games and software, am I right? Well, there's a very active WikiProject Video Games (or WP:VG for short) - perhaps you like to (informally) join. The talk page is very active and if you have any questions, someone probably answer them pretty quickly.

I noticed you've been working on Draft:Celeste 64: Fragments of the Mountain. Celeste is a real gem of an indie game! I haven't been following game news recently, your edit made me aware of the game. Need help with the draft? Well, WP:VG has a curated list of reliable sources and a very useful custom Google search engine. And what do you know, I get results by Rock Paper Shotgun, Engadget and even a Dutch language IGN piece. Maybe those will help you with the draft.

You are entitled to do with your talk page whatever you want, but removing those notices and warnings does imply you understood them. But really, Wikipedia is a collaborative effort, so communication is required. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. Thanks, and happy editing. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 19:07, 14 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://tnkesil.weebly.com/henry-stickman-escaping-the-prison-newgrounds.html. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:The Henry Stickmin Collection may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Atlantic306 ( talk) 21:11, 14 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Utopes were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at World of Goo. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Could very well become notable in the future, but seeing that the game is over a month out from planned release, and no establishment of standalone notability besides being a World of Goo sequel, for now this topic can easily be covered in World of Goo in the meantime.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:World of Goo 2 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Utopes _{( talk / cont)} 21:18, 14 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks for adding the video of gameplay to Sonic Robo Blast 2, but why did you use a clip from an old version? The video quality makes sense for the non-free use rationale but it's kind of awkward to show the gameplay with like a 2.0 video when the current version is so different. Recon rabbit 00:46, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

This is not a old clip is one it just looks old but is version 2.0 or later and the version is running on is v2.2.13 released September 2023 the lastest version and enabled MIDI sound new recorded a few hours ago I just made it low resloution because all fair use stuff on Wikipedia. LlV2 ( talk) 00:49, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

I see, the music was what confused me. I wasn't aware it had to be the MIDI version - isn't the whole game freely licensed, and it's just the visuals and sound effects that are copyrighted? Recon rabbit 01:00, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi, I turned down this draft because the copyvio detector flagged it as a copyvio of https://tnkesil.weebly.com/henry-stickman-escaping-the-prison-newgrounds.html but I'm a bit suspicious that it is a reverse copyvio from Wikipedia. I'd be grateful for your opinion, regards Atlantic306 ( talk) 18:25, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

(⚠️Warring speaking NPOV⚠️)

Did not copied from Weebly copied it from archive.org Wikipedia https://web.archive.org/web/20230120035118//info/en/?search=Draft:The_Henry_Stickmin_Collection text is CC BY 4.0 from Wikipedia a dead link that only administrators can view it. LlV2 ( talk) 14:59, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Just noting for the record that I have restored the original draft so there are no loner any copyright issues. Primefac ( talk) 07:17, 18 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Hollow Knight: Silksong, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 13:11, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply

This edit is on mobile, mobile edits wikipedia does not show the category below and you can't add ciation in category. LlV2 ( talk) 14:54, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply

And it isn't necessary either to add a citation, categories are for navigating and organising Wikipedia. If there are sufficient reliable sources that consider Silksong to be vaporware, add them to the article and then the category is suitable. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 16:18, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply

I also like to point out I wrote a personal message, urging you to slow down. WP:COMPETENCE is required, no matter how good your intentions are. You have been here less than a week. Please, LIV2, familiarise yourself with Wikipedia some more. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 19:00, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a " cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Izno ( talk) 21:04, 18 April 2024 (UTC) reply

* Please stop. The source you added from Buzzfeed does not verify the content at JumpStart Adventures 6th Grade: Mission Earthquest. In addition why did you add <ref><ref><ref></ref></ref></ref> as seen in this edit. I suggest you review our policies and guidelines on how to contribute productively in the future, or you may be blocked from editing. Isaidnoway (talk) 18:44, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Did it on mobile and mobile only wanted to add a reference once it’s the mobile fault to a source controls are bad tried to put a citation it was to slippery mobile touch. LlV2 ( talk) 22:56, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vrxces was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Seems to unfortunately fall short of WP:GNG in its current state. The reception is where things fall short; there just isn't a lot of WP:SIGCOV from WP:VG/S type sources that have much to say about the game. The PC Gamer source is the closest and it is barely evaluative. Else on the spectrum are sources of situational or low reliability (the Gamasutra link is dead) and the Markiplier review, whilst a good sign that WP:ITSPOPULAR, is not really of the type that is considered reliable. Is there anything out there where a reliable source has written at length about the game and offered an independent review or opinion on the game?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Henry Stickmin Collection and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ＶＲＸＣＥＳ ( talk) 12:38, 18 April 2024 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- ferret ( talk) 21:22, 18 April 2024 (UTC) reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LlV2 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))

---

Request reason:

Unblock me I learning to make good contributions. LlV2 ( talk) 21:51, 18 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Decline reason:

You have obviously NOT read Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks. You are clearly not reviewing your changes before hitting publish. There's nothing in this appeal that shows you have taken on board any of the issues raised with you. Decline. Cabayi ( talk) 08:08, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.