This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics: gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them pseudoscience and fringe science They should not be given alerts for those areas.

Archives

Archive 1

Hello, Reconrabbit. Thank you for your work on Beatmania IIDX 27: Heroic Verse. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:57, 18 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Kaiju Girl Caramelise into Draft:Beasts of Abigaile. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{ copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa ( talk) 13:44, 21 January 2024 (UTC) reply

That was my bad. In the past I have done attribution through the {{Copied}} template and the page was not published in mainspace yet so I didn't have anything on the talk page. If I add it to the draft talk will that be moved over along with the article to mainspace? Recon rabbit 16:01, 21 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Yes the talk page would get moved with an accepted draft. But posting on the talk page is optional; the edit summary is mandatory. — Diannaa ( talk) 01:23, 22 January 2024 (UTC) reply

I see; I'll do that on the other relevant articles. Recon rabbit 04:06, 22 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Could you clarify this edit? You're saying this causes a CS1 error despite not being anywhere close to a ref? InfiniteNexus ( talk) 19:31, 21 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Template:Tweet uses Template:Cite tweet, which means it creates a Citation Style 1 reference (even if it isn't included in the reference list at the end, which Cite tweet does). There is no way to include in the "name" parameter, even when ((ignoring errors)), without causing the article to be placed in [[Category:CS1 errors:generic name]]. Including the verified badge isn't recommended by the template documentation, and breaks how the citation is read by WP:COinS. Recon rabbit 20:09, 21 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Interesting. I don't know enough about the template to say, but is it possible to hardcode the badge into the template via a |verified=yes parameter? InfiniteNexus ( talk) 07:16, 23 January 2024 (UTC) reply

I would ask User:Anne drew Andrew and Drew as they are far more familiar with the template and would be able to judge if it's useful to add. Recon rabbit 13:50, 23 January 2024 (UTC) reply

@ InfiniteNexus: Adding anything other than text to the name parameter does seem to cause a CS1 error. You can work around this by setting the reference parameter manually instead of letting the Tweet template generate the reference for you. As for adding a verified parameter, you can find some past discussions about that in the talk page archives. It doesn't look like there is much support for it but you are welcome to bring it up again if you want. – Anne drew 01:32, 27 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Welcome, welcome, welcome Reconrabbit! I'm glad that you are joining the drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

CactiStaccingCrane ( talk)18:54, 1 February 2024 UTC [ refreshvia JWB and Geardona ( talk to me?)

		The Cleanup Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to Reconrabbit for copy edits totaling over 12,000 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE January 2024 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki ( talk) 02:52, 4 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fume hood, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Absorbent. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:07, 16 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cherry blossom you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap ( talk) 17:01, 20 February 2024 (UTC) reply

The article Cherry blossom you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Cherry blossom for comments about the article, and Talk:Cherry blossom/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap ( talk) 21:22, 22 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Srb2 22 title.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:54, 23 February 2024 (UTC) reply

On 7 March 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Cherry blossom, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the cherry blossom was used symbolically in Japanese World War II propaganda, with falling petals representing "young soldiers' sacrifice for the emperor"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cherry blossom. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Cherry blossom), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 7 March 2024 (UTC) reply

		Citation Barnstar
		This award is given in recognition to Reconrabbit for collecting more than 25 points during the WikiProject Unreferenced articles's FEB24 backlog drive. Your contributions played a crucial role in sourcing 14,300 unsourced articles during the drive. Thank you so much for participating and helping to reduce the backlog! – – DreamRimmer ( talk) 18:30, 8 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Scott Tower, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin ( talk) 10:56, 13 March 2024 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Music of Dance Dance Revolution is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Music of Dance Dance Revolution until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Loyalmoonie ( talk) 19:02, 18 March 2024 (UTC) reply

I added an historical photo of Yuko Mitsuya from 1976 to the article. Thank you for your guidance. TreeElf ( talk) 04:49, 26 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vrxces was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Borders on notability but unfortunately there doesn't seem to be any reliable reviews that would confidently substantiate it against WP:GNG. MMORPG.com is not considered to be a reliable source as per WP:VG/S. I would say that the sources cited for "attention upon release" do not really constitute reviews but brief bulletins about the game's release, given each are a paragraph and scarcely evaluate the game. Is there anything else out there?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Faunasphere and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ＶＲＸＣＥＳ ( talk) 22:41, 3 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello, Reconrabbit! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ＶＲＸＣＥＳ ( talk) 22:41, 3 April 2024 (UTC) reply

On 4 April 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Scott Tower, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Scott Tower was built in 1940 as part of a project to create Holyoke, Massachusetts' "own version of New York City's Central Park"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Scott Tower. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Scott Tower), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 ( talk) 00:37, 4 April 2024 (UTC) reply

		The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to Reconrabbit for copy edits totaling over 8,000 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE March 2024 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki ( talk) 07:35, 4 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello, Reconrabbit. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 15:25, 12 April 2024 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{ You've got mail}} or {{ ygm}} template.

ARandomName123 ( talk)^{Ping me!} 15:25, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi, I redirected this article to the Bookeen article as an alternative for deletion. Pavlor ( talk) 05:26, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks. The Bookeen article does need some improvement. Maybe now more information could be provided about the Gen1 on that page but as it was the page was just a list of device specs and promotional information which is why I put forward the PROD. Recon rabbit 13:40, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply