|
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 15:09, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi JennyOz. Wikipedia's
signature guidelines require that your signature contain a link to your user page or to this talkpage - please could you amend
your preferences to enable such a link? (If you replace the signature text with [[User:JennyOz|<span style="color:black;">JennyOz</span>]]
and tick the box marked "Treat the above as Wikimarkup" then it will appear exactly the same, but will contain the necessary link).
Yunshui
雲
水 11:32, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi, JennyOz. You might be interested in enabling Twinkle so you can easily rollback an instance of vandalism yourself. You can do so in your Preferences under 'Gadgets'. Happy editing– Gilliam ( talk) 13:06, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi Jenny. I've taken Bullock out again - he's resigning, not retiring (his seat is not up for election this cycle anyway, unless there's a double dissolution). Once the Bullock -> Dodson changeover is effected (as far as I know Bullock hasn't submitted his resignation yet), which should be before the election, there'll just be a little swap down in the Senate tables where the continuing senators are listed. :) Frickeg ( talk) 11:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
I couldn't remember the specifics on this, so I looked it up for Jenny McAllister and it seems to be that the parliamentary vote counts as the "election", so Dodson's term has now begun. Frickeg ( talk) 01:32, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for your kind words! In general, I usually only add items with an article link, whether it is to an article about the event, or to people or organisations involved. But it's not a strict rule, anything with a lot of coverage should be fine, and may prompt creation of an article. With anniversaries of events, I would probably not include them unless the anniversary itself had an article (such as Australian Bicentenary), just because it is fairly subjective about which anniversaries to include and of course the original event should be in the year article when it happened anyway so it's kind of repeating the information. -- Canley ( talk) 05:01, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for the 'birthday' greetings Jenny! Just reading the message on your userpage, I hope you're feeling more and more comfortable with your contributions here - you sound like the sort of person that Wikipedia needs more of. Cheers, -- jjron ( talk) 11:23, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
A belated thanks for the barnstar! This is some of my absolute favourite kind of work to do on Wikipedia, but it's still nice to be appreciated! Frickeg ( talk) 05:53, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
Try using the "undo" button first, but it will most likely fail if the edits are old and there have been subsequent edits to that section. If it doesn't work, just edit it back to the original state. -- Canley ( talk) 08:48, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
As a general rule of thumb I don't edit other people's user-space drafts without invitation - I'll wait until it gets moved to article space, as I'm sure User:JennyOz/sandbox/Draft1 will. However if you want me to start on some of the basics (eg WP:SURNAME or WP:NEUTRAL, per my comments on User talk:JennyOz/sandbox/Draft1) while it's still in your user-space, let me know. Mitch Ames ( talk) 14:02, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Kerry ( talk) 00:05, 2 September 2016 (UTC)Hello! Your submission of Orange Sky Laundry at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Mitch Ames ( talk) 13:31, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
On 18 September 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Orange Sky Laundry, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in their second year of providing a free mobile laundry service for the homeless, the co-founders of Orange Sky Laundry were jointly awarded Young Australian of the Year? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Orange Sky Laundry. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Orange Sky Laundry), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass ( talk) 00:02, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
... for the piano-related clipping. Interesting historical stuff.
I too hate the word "over-arching". See a full list of my pet hates here.
Cheers.
PS. Hi, Jenny. -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 11:12, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Hi, Jenny! I saw your comment to Scott Davis and just thought I'd give you the short intro to coords.
If you are looking at an article which is using the infobox Australian place (as Cowra and most Australian places do), then you can added the coords either as Degrees Minutes Seconds like this
| latd = 33 | latm = 50 | lats = 6 | longd = 148 | longm = 41 | longs = 33
Or if you have decimal degrees
| latd =33.835 | longd = 148.6925
There are plenty of websites that will convert between DMS and decimal degrees if you want to do that, but the infobox supports either format.
In the Australian place infobox, it is ASSUMED you are talking about a latitude that is South of the Equator and East of Greenwich (because all Australia is in the SE of the world), so there is no need for negatives. In other parts of Wikipedia and on Commons, you would put -33 or -33.835 to signify south of the equator.
If you want to know what are the coords of an Australian placename, then this is your best place to go : Gazetteer of Australia.
There's more to coords than the above, so let me know if your needs extend beyond the infobox Australian places and I will try to explain. Kerry ( talk) 21:00, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, JennyOz. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Rhiannan Iffland, JennyOz!
Wikipedia editor Canley just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Looks fine, good job
To reply, leave a comment on Canley's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Canley ( talk) 08:48, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
On 1 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rhiannan Iffland, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after being granted a wildcard entry, Australian high diver Rhiannan Iffland went on to win the 2016 Cliff Diving World Series championship in her rookie year? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rhiannan Iffland. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Rhiannan Iffland), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber ( talk · contribs) 00:14, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi Jenny, thanks for your great review and support of the FWT list. I was wondering if you'd be interested in reviewing Australian Cricket Hall of Fame which is also at FLC right now? It's looking a little lonely having received not one glance of attention since I nominated it a few weeks back...! The Rambling Man ( talk) 07:50, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi J Bar, thanks for creating an article for the Kates' new show. I'm not sure though that there is meant to be an apostrophe at end of its name? JennyOz ( talk) 04:15, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
G'day, I wondered if you would mind taking a look at this article, the latest in my work on the frontier wars in SA? I'd like to get a few opinions before nominating it for GA review. Cheers,
Hello, again, JennyOz – I hadn't run across your user name before, so out of curiosity looked at your user page. I also don't like getting in to arguments, so avoid them whenever possible. It looks like you have an attention to detail, so you might like to participate at Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors. You could help cut down on our backlog of articles needing copy-editing. Some of the articles are in pretty good shape, and only need polishing. Others are in bad shape, or written by a non-native speaker of English, and require a lot of work. Normally, it is not contentious editing, and there's no rush; you don't have to finish an article all on one day. If you're curious, you can look at articles that have been copy-edited already and see in the revision history what the copy-editor did. Look in the archives. I'm sure each copy-editor has his or her own style of copy-editing and what he/she considers important enough to change. If you're really interested in beginning, you might like to look at the tools I've placed at the top of my talk page. Feel free to copy (in edit mode) and paste to your page any that seem useful. (Be sure to click "Cancel" to get out of edit mode.) If you're interested in Australian topics, you might look at Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia. For fun, you might look at User:Carptrash#I just resurrected, and User:EEng and User talk:EEng. – Corinne ( talk) 16:29, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Hey Jenny, I have the above list at FLC, and I always appreciate your insightful comments, was wondering if you'd have a chance to cast you eyes over it? No worries if not, as you'd expect from me, it's practically perfect........ ! Hope you're well, The Rambling Man ( talk) 21:58, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
Following your advice, we now have a fair use image of the statuette at the (still awful but not quite so awful) Laureus World Sports Awards article. Work there continues....... I'm aiming for WP:FTC before Xmas. The Rambling Man ( talk) 15:36, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi Jenny, a brief departure from the lists I so enjoy making, I've asked Lugnuts if he'd like to help get Ellyse Perry up to featured article status, and then I suddenly thought of you, and wondered if you'd like to join it too? The article is in good shape already but could use a copyedit and source review before we nominate it. What do you reckon? The Rambling Man ( talk) 09:35, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
hi JennyOz, thanks for the thanks over my edits at Wikipedia:WikiProject Australian law cleanup list.
Coolabahapple (
talk) 07:09, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi Jenny, the above list is now at FLC, if you have the time and feel the inclination to have a look! Cheers. The Rambling Man ( talk) 10:29, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, JennyOz. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
On 25 December 2017, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ken Catchpole, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer T♦ C 18:03, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
@ JennyOz: Thanks for fixing my typo> Pendright ( talk) 06:36, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
@ JennyOz: I’d like to nominate the USMCWR article for an ACR! So, would I be testing your patience if I asked you for a read through beforehand? If I am, no problem, I’ll understand. I hope all is well down under. Regards! Pendright ( talk) 05:33, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
Thanks for taking the time to provide such detailed comments on the Australian Defence Force article. Nick-D ( talk) 10:05, 25 January 2018 (UTC) |
Thanks Nick-D!, always happy to help, especially when Australian articles heading to main page. JennyOz ( talk) 10:48, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/Laureus World Sports Awards/archive1 has just been promoted to featured topic. Thanks for your help in getting it there! The Rambling Man ( talk) 21:42, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Vinny Lauwers at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah ( talk) 14:29, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
On 10 February 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Vinny Lauwers, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Australian yachtsman Vinny Lauwers circumnavigated the globe solo with his "mistress"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Vinny Lauwers. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page ( here's how, Vinny Lauwers), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih ( talk) 01:07, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
Australian sports
Thank you for quality articles about sports people from Australia, such as Rhiannan Iffland and Vinny Lauwers, for improving Van Diemen's Land v Port Phillip, 1851, for diligent corrections with clear edit summaries, "interested in current issues and BLPs in Australia being recorded correctly", - you are an awesome Wikipedian!
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 09:08, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
It's a wonder how many improvements a featured article can have after I've assumed that it's reached the perfect state :D Thank you for the corrections Jenny; really appreciate it. Lourdes 07:13, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi Jenny,
Just so it is clear, my edit summaries are not about you or your edits (which are clearly improvements). I was and am peeved that I made edits in several sections and then got an edit conflict and, as an IP editor, lost all the changes I'd made and was presented only with your last saved version so could not cut-and-paste my changes in. It's a fault in the software.
Cheers, a lowly IP, 125.168.41.242 ( talk) 05:01, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
The Reviewer Barnstar | ||
For your assistance on Neil Armstrong Hawkeye7 (discuss) 10:46, 3 March 2018 (UTC) |
@ JennyOz: Thank you so much for your edits of the WAVES article, you have a keen eye. They were also timely, because I’m planning to nominate it for an ACR. Having reviewed the article, do you have any suggestions you’d care to offer. Pendright ( talk) 06:09, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for editing my contributions to Australia at the 2018 Commonwealth Games— Preceding unsigned comment added by Aussiesportlibrarian ( talk • contribs) 12:10, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for spotting the dodgy Trove citations, I have fixed the references to The News. I remembered reading a discussion between some Wikipedians and the NLA about this (newspaper names and links in the automatic citations), I think it was this post and this post on the Trove forum? I remember they did roll out some fixes a few years back, it may have been to do with these discussions. Probably a good idea to set up redirects for the capitalisation issues, but they'll have to fix the link to The News at their end. -- Canley ( talk) 07:32, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Military history service award | ||
On behalf of the Milhist coordinators, you are hereby awarded the WikiChevrons for reviewing a total of two Milhist articles at PR, GAN, ACR or FAC during the period January to March 2018. Thank you for supporting Wikipedia's quality content processes. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 09:35, 20 April 2018 (UTC) |
Hi KCVelaga, belated thanks for this! JennyOz ( talk) 10:58, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
YW, Jenny. :) Thanks for all your edits on the main article. -- 122.108.141.214 ( talk) 07:47, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
Military history reviewers' award | ||
On behalf of the Milhist coordinators, you are hereby awarded these stripes for reviewing a total of seven Milhist articles at PR, GAN, ACR or FAC during the period April to June 2018. Thank you for supporting Wikipedia's quality content processes.
AustralianRupert (
talk) 06:57, 6 July 2018 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste |
Thanks AustralianRupert and for all you do. JennyOz ( talk) 11:01, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
Thank you JennyOz for chasing up references for all those exhibitions on Mirka Mora - brilliant! Much appreciated. Jamesmcardle (talk) 13:22, 30 August 2018 (UTC) |
Hope to see more of you! Tony (talk) 08:35, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
I have Apollo 11 up for review at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Apollo 11. We're trying to get the article in shape for running on the front page on the 50th anniversary in July 2009. Could I trouble you to work your magic on the article? Hawkeye7 (discuss) 11:01, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Military history reviewers' award | ||
On behalf of the Milhist coordinators, you are hereby awarded these stripes for reviewing a total of seven Milhist articles at PR, GAN, ACR or FAC during the period July to September 2018. Thank you for supporting Wikipedia's quality content processes.
Kges1901 (
talk) 00:11, 4 October 2018 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste |
Hi Kges1901, belated thanks for this and for all you do. Regards, JennyOz ( talk) 05:45, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
@ JennyOz: If you care to offer it, I’d like your opinionh on a grammar situation that has troubled me from time to time. According to Hoyle (American), adding “ing” to the ending of a verb changes both the meaning and the function of the verb. In some cases, it causes the verb to act as a noun or adjective, and in others, it changes the tense of the verb. So,If the word explained is changed to explaining, did a past tense verb become a present tense something else? The more research I do, the more circular it becomes. Anyway, I hope you are well! Pendright ( talk) 07:05, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
@ JennyOz: It seems I’m caught between a rock and a hard place and I’m hoping you can help. Let me explain: the WAVES article is now under FAR, and the reviewer had this to say –
I’ve exhausted my circle of fresh eyes, so would you consider approaching some editor(s) you know to see if they might be amenable to do the deed? In any event, thanks for any help you care to offer. Pendright ( talk) 20:50, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
G'day, Jenny, I trust you are well. I have nominated the New Zealand and Australian Division article for a peer review, which can be found here: Wikipedia:Peer review/New Zealand and Australian Division/archive1. You have a very keen eye, so I would be very thankful if you had a moment to take a look. If you don't have the time, I understand. Thanks. AustralianRupert ( talk) 10:31, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, JennyOz. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The Copyeditor's Barnstar | |
Thanks for your wonderful copy-edits to articles; they're super helpful and much appreciated. Keep up the good work! SkyGazer 512 Oh no, what did I do this time? 19:15, 1 December 2018 (UTC) |
Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors, a WikiProject dedicated to improving Wikipedia articles through copy editing. You are receiving this invitation because someone has noticed the quality of your edits and your commitment to improving the content of Wikipedia. Please see our project page for more information and reasons to join. You may wish to join us during our backlog elimination drives, help fulfill editor requests, or simply become a part of our supportive community. We hope to help you so that you can help make Wikipedia a better place! ~~~~ |
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019! | |
Hello JennyOz, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Content Review Medal of Merit (Military history) | ||
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Content Review Medal of Merit (Military history) for October to December 2018 reviews.
MilHistBot (
talk) 01:05, 8 January 2019 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste |
Hi Jenny, thanks for all your comments (as usual) and particularly at Kevin Beattie's FAC. Dweller and I were wondering if you'd be able to have a quick/slow/meticulous look at Alf Ramsey who we made a major surge on in mid-2017, got it to GA and then walked away. I think content-wise it's fine for FA, but would certainly benefit from your eagle eyes. If you can't, or simply don't want to, not a problem at all. Cheers, The Rambling Man ( talk) 15:00, 15 January 2019 (UTC) P.S. I may be heading down under in late February, can't wait!
Thank you. I've replied on the last of your points. Apologies for the delay. -- Dweller ( talk) Become old fashioned! 11:49, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for the edits! What brought you to Solrad 1? Neopeius ( talk) 14:42, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
Military history reviewers' award | ||
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (2 stripes) for January to March 2019 reviews.
Peacemaker67 (
talk) via
MilHistBot (
talk) 00:31, 3 April 2019 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste |
@ JennyOz: Hello: Could you tell me the two most popular style guides used in British English? And in your writing, do you or do you not place a comma before the word which? And why or why not!
I hopw you are well!
Pendright ( talk) 02:43, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
The Copyeditor's Barnstar | |
Hi. I seem to keep coming across you making small, but frequently important, edits to articles. They are appreciated and please keep them up. Gog the Mild ( talk) 08:19, 29 August 2019 (UTC) |
Thank you very much Gog the Mild - I am agog! Best wishes, JennyOz ( talk) 09:19, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Military history reviewers' award | ||
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for participating in 2 reviews between July and September 2019.
Peacemaker67 (
talk) via
MilHistBot (
talk) 01:16, 5 October 2019 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste |
Thank you for having a look at A Voyage Round the World before it will hit the Main Page! However, I am not sure whether I should agree with this edit: all of these books cite him as "George Forster" (and so does the original title page). On the other hand, while GF was known as George while in England, most of the literature about him uses the German form "Georg Forster", including the only English-language biography (by Thomas P. Saine) and the Encyclopaedia Britannica. The Royal Society uses George. I think there's a case to be made for harmonising all appearances of the name, but I would prefer to use the names as used in each of the publications (which then means using both Georg and George). One of these days I'll try to write something useful about this and add it to Georg Forster, but I haven't quite decided what to do... Let me know what you think about how to approach this in A Voyage Round the World. Happy editing, — Kusma ( t· c) 19:14, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi, i want translation to page from Czech . How can i create a page? Baran Ahmet ( talk) 16:29, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
On 29 November 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Clive James, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 01:46, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Does the Oz suffix indicate you are Australian? If yes, would you mind also checking the Australasian Antarctic Expedition for pollution by nasty foreign varieties of English (though I get the impression that, like the Canadians, the Aussies are pretty laid back about the arguments that consume the British and Americans). If no, then I will leave you in peace to go back to your appreciation of Black Sabbath or Frank L. Baum. Yomangani talk 17:37, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
The Reviewers Award | ||
By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this barnstar in recognition of your top class and unusually thorough reviews. Long may you generate them. Gog the Mild ( talk) 19:53, 2 March 2020 (UTC) |
Hi Jenny. I do a fair it of both copy editing and article reviewing myself, and fairly frequently nominate articles. However, and apparently this is not unusual, I struggle to adequately check my own work. I was quite serious earlier, and if you were to run any future nominations of mine through your diligent review process I would be most grateful. Regardless, excellent work. Do please keep on doing it. Gog the Mild ( talk) 19:53, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
This article has a bit of a troubled history, and I clearly shouldn't have sent it on without more rigorous editing--I guess I was a bit tired. Thank you so much for all your good work; I really appreciate it. User:Grlucas, I know you already know it takes a village, and JennyOz did some great work. Drmies ( talk) 16:34, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Military history reviewers' award | ||
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (2 stripes) for participating in 7 reviews between January and March 2020.
Peacemaker67 (
talk) via
MilHistBot (
talk) 00:31, 3 April 2020 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{
WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space
|
Thank you for your part in bringing Australasian Antarctic Expedition to the Main page today, in memory of Brian. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 20:16, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi Jenny. You were good enough to do a review for Battle of Cape Hermaeum at ACR - here. I think that you missed my ping, and I didn't re-ping as it didn't attract any further interest and I withdrew it after six weeks. It is now at FAC - here - and I wonder if you might be able to have another look at it? Thanks. Gog the Mild ( talk) 17:31, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
Military history reviewers' award | ||
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (2 stripes) for participating in 5 reviews between April and June 2020.
Peacemaker67 (
talk) via
MilHistBot (
talk) 00:31, 5 July 2020 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{
WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space
|
Thanks Peacemaker67, JennyOz ( talk) 08:09, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
I am not sure that it's a good idea to speak about "First World War" when it's a 1920s topic, and no Second in site yet. We call places by their historic names at a given time, - why not wars? -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 13:30, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Editor of the Week | ||
Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week in recognition of adding sparkle to articles. Thank you for the great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project) |
User:Gog the Mild submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:
You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:
{{User:UBX/EoTWBox}}
JennyOz |
Editor of the Week for the week beginning September 20, 2020 |
A wonderful example of a true Wikignome: inserts grammar corrections and MoS compliances in a helpful and almost ridiculously modest way. They assess things on many levels. They correct basic grammar flaws in your FAC in such a way as to leave it error-free. Many veteran highly-experienced editors turn to Jenny asking to check over their articles. She has spent years of putting that final sparkle on Wikipedia's best articles. |
Recognized for |
a congenial and friendly editor |
Notable work |
Repairing Australian BLP's |
Submit a nomination |
Thanks again for your efforts! ― Buster7 ☎ 15:51, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
The Copyeditor's Barnstar | |
Thanks for your work on Revolt of the Admirals. Much appreciated. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 03:56, 29 September 2020 (UTC) |
Thanks Hawkeye7, you're very welcome, anytime! It was a very interesting read. JennyOz ( talk) 07:43, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Dahlias in Walsdorf |
I just want to bring flowers as thanks for you always fixing the little things I overlook! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:59, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Hey, practiced would be correct in American English in the context that it was used in that sentence in Cliché verre. Seeing MOS:RETAIN, I've thus had to undo that edit of yours. — I'llbeyourbeach ( talk) 10:10, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Military history reviewers' award | ||
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (2 stripes) for participating in 6 reviews between July and September 2020.
Harrias (
talk) via
MilHistBot (
talk) 05:25, 7 October 2020 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{
WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space
|
Thank you Harrias, JennyOz ( talk) 06:01, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
The Premium Reviewer Barnstar | ||
By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this barnstar in recognition of the vast number of thorough, detailed and actionable reviews you have carried out. This work is very much appreciated. Gog the Mild ( talk) 11:47, 27 November 2020 (UTC) |
This edit deserves more than just a thank-you click! Did you just happen to know these women's other pen names? —valereee ( talk) 11:20, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
my article on American logistics in the Northern France campaign is languishing at FAC at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/American logistics in the Northern France campaign/archive1 for want of reviewers. The article is technical and complicated like World War II in general, so the subject isn't too popular, but it is important. I think you already looked at it once before it was split. If anyone could pitch in with a review, it would be greatly appreciated. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:00, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
Beethoven in 1803 |
---|
Thank you so much for contribs to the birthday display! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 15:52, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
Military history reviewers' award | ||
On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (2 stripes) for participating in 4 reviews between October and December 2020.
Peacemaker67 (
talk) via
MilHistBot (
talk) 06:43, 10 January 2021 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{
WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space
|
Hi Jenny, Would you be able to review the M113 armoured personnel carriers in Australian service FAC in the next few days? It's getting to the point where it's in danger of being archived. I appreciate that it's a big and somewhat sprawling article, but if it's helpful the material on the technical details has been checked by military history nerds (for better or worse...), and you might want to focus on the more accessible/interesting material on how the things were acquired and their service history, which might well be where any remaining problems are most likely to be. Thank you, Nick-D ( talk) 00:47, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
The Copyeditor's Barnstar | |
Two of "my?" recent articles for DYK and Women in Red mysteriously improved. I'm holding you responsible. Thank you from me and Louisa Wilkins Victuallers ( talk) 12:54, 7 May 2021 (UTC) |
Haha Victuallers, you too! (See below.) BTW I don't think Kuipers-Rietberg was ever officially in red here, but the article was prompted by a Dutch news report, on the occasion of 5 May, that the role of women in the Dutch resistance had been (predictably) underplayed. Drmies ( talk) 00:12, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
Thank you so much for those copyedits. I'm a bit embarrassed, but also glad to be working on a collaborative project. Drmies ( talk) 00:10, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
I was browsing your talk page and noticed your comment on bravery. If you didn't know it, then you might be interested in Witold Pilecki, who I assume would be the only person known to qualify for Category:Infiltrators of the Auschwitz concentration camp (which is presumably why it's not a Wikipedia category). I'll admit that I was flabbergasted when I heard about what he did. Boud ( talk) 15:47, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
The Copyeditor's Barnstar | |
Thankyou so much for your copyediting on here. It seems every DYK I put through is improved by your work (I can't believe how many typos I make!). Much appreciated - Dumelow ( talk) 06:54, 24 August 2021 (UTC) |
Thank you for your constant copy-edit help, including for Herrscher des Himmels, erhöre das Lallen, BWV 248 III, shown on the Main page, and here. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 11:55, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
And a Happy New Year! Thanks for your helpful addition to Elspeth Green. I have followed this up and uploaded her section of that portrait which you might like to view before a malbot comes along to munge it. Andrew🐉( talk) 14:17, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
And thank for your help copy-editing Grant Robert Sutherland, just in time for the DYK that went up today. I am constantly astonished at how many times I can read over my own work, without spotting those obvious typos. ("University of medicine" - what was I thinking?)
P.S. I wonder if we are long-lost cousins?
-- Gronk Oz ( talk) 04:08, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Osbert Lancaster went through a peer review and the rigours of the featured article candidacy process without anyone spotting the typo you spotted and corrected yesterday. It's one of Wikipedia's strengths that such minor errors are always apt to be noticed and corrected sooner or later. Thank you for noticing and dealing with this one! Tim riley talk 22:09, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
Four years! |
---|
Thanks for the suggestion. Campbell only referred to "Lt. Gov. Hill". I meant to track down who that must have been, but it slipped my mind. Also thanks for the copyedits - I'm so bad at copyediting my own writing. Guettarda ( talk) 16:14, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
A couple of my boilerplate responses to commaists:
I am aware of the, to my mind strange, convention of inserting a comma after any initial mention of time. It is not one I use. So proponents of it would write, and, I assume, say "Today, I ate breakfast"; I would write and say "Today I ate breakfast". Either is acceptable. (Much as I itch to remove them when copy editing for GoCE.)
You are, I gather, a "commaist"; I am, you will have gathered, not. During a FAC discussion of one of my nominations earlier this year an experienced reviewer who is also a commaist gently mocked themself by quoting the grammar writer Lynn Truss.
Gog the Mild ( talk) 21:02, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
On 27 February 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article John Landy, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 08:24, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
Hey, how's it going? I see you've reviewed football-related articles for FA in recent years. A.C. Monza has been a candidate for over three weeks, and there are almost no comments. I would really appreciate it if you took some time to leave a comment (it doesn't necessarily have to be a full review) :) Nehme 1499 21:10, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
The Copyeditor's Barnstar | |
Looks like I got two Afghan/USA people confused. Thank you for catching it. Ive removed all the stuff from that ref. On vacation at the moment so thank you bringing this up before it hit the main page. Victuallers ( talk) 17:31, 18 August 2022 (UTC) |
Thanks Victuallers, have a great vacation! JennyOz ( talk) 17:46, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
... for consistently finding the little bugs in articles on the Main page! - images of a rich summer, especially in music -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 20:54, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for supporting the NPP initiative to improve WMF support of the Page Curation tools. Another way you can help is by voting in the Board of Trustees election. The next Board composition might be giving attention to software development. The election closes on 6 September at 23:59 UTC. View candidate statement videos and Vote Here. MB 03:33, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
I've now put American services and supply in the Siegfried Line campaign up for review at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/American services and supply in the Siegfried Line campaign/archive2. If you have the time to take a look at it again, that would be greatly appreciated. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:13, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
As part of fixing up the article on the Hanford Site, I spun off a brand new article on the wartime Hanford Engineer Works. If yopu could take a look at it for me, that would be appreciated. It is very new, so probably has a lot of typos. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 00:29, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
You are a Ray of Sunshine! | ||
It says here "The Ray of Sunshine is bestowed on that person who, when you see their name at the top of your watchlist, you know that all is right with the world and that you can relax. May be awarded to any person who consistently brightens your day." So here you go. Gog the Mild ( talk) 16:49, 13 April 2019 (UTC) |
Aw, shucks Gog, thank you very much for this. You are a delight for so many reasons and it's always a pleasure to cross paths. JennyOz ( talk) 09:44, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi JennyOz. I have two articles up for review at FAC: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/American transportation in the Siegfried Line campaign/archive2 and Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Anna Lee Fisher/archive1. If you could drop by either one with some comments, that would be much appreciated. The latter is the latest in my series on the first women NASA astronauts. It was a bit more difficult to write than the others because there was no biography. (Shannon Lucid is still to come.) The Ray of Sunshine award was well-deserved by the way. Have a sunny day. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:12, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
G'day Jenny, hope you are having a great break and had a good Xmas. As you know, I've done a bit of work on SA pollie bios ( Bill Denny and Arthur Blackburn), and recently for Ernest Roberts (Australian politician) through GAN. I wanted to share that I am on a bit of a mission to improve bio articles on SA pollies who served. I currently have Jack Critchley at GAN. Even though I managed to get Denny and Blackburn to FA, I'm not sure how much interest there will be in some of these other guys from WP Military history members as in some cases their military service is incidental rather than the basis of their notability. I'd appreciate it if you would consider taking a look at any that pique your interest when they appear for review. Cheers, Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 19:22, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
On 9 January 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Danny Kaleikini, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer T• C 04:46, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Mahalo nui loa | |
Thank you for nominating Danny Kaleikini at ITN and for your meticulous editing and proofreading across so many articles at DYK! Cielquiparle ( talk) 12:19, 9 January 2023 (UTC) |
After you suggested I link to William Everett Potter in American transportation in the Siegfried Line campaign, I saw that the article was in poor shape, so I revised it over the Christmas break. It will appear on the front page in a few days time. Thanks for your help. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:41, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
happy new year |
---|
Thank you for consistent quality checks and improvements! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:58, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
What error(s)? 4bofus ( talk) 18:32, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
The Minor barnstar | |
Nice minor fixes. BorgQueen ( talk) 02:35, 10 February 2023 (UTC) |
Thank you BorgQueen - and for all the great work you do at DYK! JennyOz ( talk) 11:25, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Five years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:32, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
The Fonz
(talk) has given you a
Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.
To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{ subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. |
Hi JennyOz. Thank you very much for contributing multiple improvements to the article I created, Chauncey Yellow Robe. I admire how your rephrasing added clarity to sentences throughout the article. I also deeply appreciate fixing my mistyped transcription of his given name, which is arguably the most important word on the page. Thanks again and I hope you enjoy the dessert. The Fonz (talk) 19:59, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi Jenny, and many thanks for your work on knocking sense into my last couple of FACs. I am after a favour. I am just wrapping up work on Battle of Zama, one of the big/famous battles of the Punic Wars. It has a lot of sources and has needed a lot of work. Frankly, I have now read it so many times that I can't focus on it. It will be my FAC after next, so being nominated, hopefully, in the second half of April.
What it could do with is a rigorous copy edit to weed out all of the nonsense that I am too jaded to recognise. So you sprang to mind. If you fancy it, my draft is here. If you don't, no worries; I know I am pushing my luck and I very much appreciate what you do do to make "my" articles presentable. Gog the Mild ( talk) 13:12, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
Kia ora Jenny, one of the things that I do (when I have some spare time) is to look a few days to weeks ahead of upcoming main page content. And I've found a brand-new editor with 68 edits under their belt as of right now. Thirty of those edits have been the creation of POTD templates. Oh dear. There's a lot of tidy up necessary, like this one. I thought I'd leave you a note just in case you get to it. Schwede 66 09:49, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
I have a new article on the History of military logistics which I have up for review at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/History of military logistics. It is a sprawling article covering 2,000 years of global history, and no doubt has my usual large number of typos. It would be much appreciates if you could you have a look at it for me. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:10, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
On 30 June 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Simon Crean, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 04:31, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
G’day Jenny, I hope you’re well and staying indoors in this rubbish weather! I’ve just had a crack at getting the Des Corcoran article up to GA standard (lots to do to get it anywhere near FA, admittedly), and I wondered if you might take a look and see if there are any suggestions you might be able to make regarding areas for improvement? I will look up Hansard and see what I can say about his first speech, and look more closely at his changes of seat, ministerial work, policy focii, etc, but anything that comes to mind, please let me know? Cheers, Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 08:37, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Hi Jenny, I hope that things are good with you. I was wondering if you fancied running your forensic-like reviewing skills over Iron Gwazi at FAC? It is from a first-time nominator and already has three prose supports. However, I would feel much more relaxed about it if a reviewer whom I knew to be both informed and rigorous had gone through it. Obviously if time or motivation does not permit, that is fine. Thanks. Gog the Mild ( talk) 16:27, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
The Teamwork Barnstar | |
Iron Gwazi passed its FAC! Although I am a primary contributor to the article, your involvement was just as significant. The road to FA relies on community consensus and voluntary commentary. You dedicated your time and skills to help improve the article to its current condition. Without your input, the article would not have reached its status quo. You are a significant contributor! Whether you are a one-time commenter or contribute to other GA, PR, or FA candidates, I hereby award JennyOz with the Teamwork Barnstar! Thank you for your efforts to improve the Iron Gwazi article. Adog ( Talk・ Cont) 02:39, 19 July 2023 (UTC) |
I wonder if you could take a look at Howard Florey, which I have up for FAC at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Howard Florey/archive1? Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:23, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi JennyOz, I hope you’re keeping well. I have a PR open here on Edward Oxford, the first failed assassin of Queen Victoria. If you have the time, I’d be delighted to hear your thoughts. Cheers - SchroCat ( talk) 20:26, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
If you have the time, would you be able to have a look at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/American logistics in the Western Allied invasion of Germany/archive1? I am in dire need of reviewers. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 00:48, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rhodesia Information Centre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dossier. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 05:55, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
my story today |
---|
I am sorry, Jenny, that I caused you pain, and would like to try to find out what I can do better next time. I may have had language problems. Let's begin with one example, and I call Jim as well, as the author. I often ask in reviews (DYK and also FA): "How do you feel about an infobox?" (... and the stress should be on feel even if not marked.) I have learned in 10 hard years that there strong emotions involved in the topic, which I don't understand but have to accept that they exist. I think that by now an infobox is the normal thing to have and that acceptance grew over the last year ( Mozart, Laurence Olivier, per the community). I feel that my standard question is simple and neutral, and I take "no" for an answer, and take no answer for "no". In the nomination, I asked no one specifically, but expected a reply rather from the author. I don't ask the question when I think I know an author's preference (but you never know, see today's Walt Disney. For Jim, I know that there was a reluctance at some time, but such things can change, and I am a curious person. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:30, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Today, it's a place that inspired me, musings if you have time. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 13:03, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
On 26 October 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John Lennon's psychedelic Rolls-Royce, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that John Lennon liked to tell how an older woman lost her temper when she saw his psychedelic Rolls-Royce (pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John Lennon's psychedelic Rolls-Royce. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, John Lennon's psychedelic Rolls-Royce), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 00:02, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Hook update | ||
Your hook reached 38,585 views (1,607.7 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of October 2023 – nice work! |
GalliumBot ( talk • contribs) (he/ it) 03:28, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Would you be able to have a look at Len Deighton as part of the FAC review I have opened? As always, I would welcome your comments on the article if you have the time - although no pressure, if you're tied up on other things. Cheers - SchroCat ( talk) 16:04, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
A very happy Christmas and New Year to you! | |||
Have a great Christmas, and may 2024 bring you joy, happiness – and no trolls, vandals or visits from
Krampus!
|
Thanks SchroCat and I wish the very same for you! JennyOz ( talk) 02:56, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
{{subst:REVISIONUSER}} has given you a
salamander! Salamanders promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Your salamander must be fed daily and will be your faithful companion for life! You can brighten someone's day by giving them a
WikiCritter on their talk page with a friendly message, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
To give a salamander: {{salamander|message=Your message here. ~~~~}}
Take care of your loving forever companion on your journey (to the jungles of the world of Wikipedia, perhaps) and avoid the evil WikiFauna! Au revoir! 🦎
Not experienced with code so sorry :)
Cometkeiko (
talk) 18:06, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
On 7 February 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Barry John, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai ( talk) 13:02, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Six years! |
---|
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:16, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
I have Hanford Engineer Works up for review at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Hanford Engineer Works/archive1. It is something of a straggler of the Manhattan Project articles; all the others were done years ago but I created this one in 2022. If you have the time to take a look, it would be greatly appreciated. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 22:42, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for your helpful edits. Just want you to know that I noticed that you are always making positive edits! Recently I saw your edits on Elbert E. Martin. Keep up the great work! Bruxton ( talk) 02:57, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Turns out Capri-Suns aren't canned – that factoid only had one source, which turned out to be a complete fabrication. {{ trout}} for me! theleekycauldron ( talk • she/her) 06:38, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your work there, always great suggestions, always uncontroversial, and never wrong. Step hen 09:35, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Man I need to know if you found my 'vandalism' on dan andrews or lee rhiannon first. Need to improve my spreading of the truth :) DeadlyRampage26 ( talk) 11:04, 26 April 2024 (UTC)