Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to 2018–19 South Pacific cyclone season—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist ( talk) 05:40, 9 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Ahh. Okay Incognito Fedora ( talk) 16:47, 9 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm CycloneIns. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Cyclone Jasper have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. 🍙 🌀 Cyclone Ins ✉ 15:24, 14 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Hi Incognito Fedora! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Alexeyevitch ^(talk) 01:03, 15 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Incognito-Fedora, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Cyclone Michaung. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! 🌀🍙 Insendieum ( ❓) 18:10, 9 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lacto-ovo vegetarianism. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ChaotıċEnby( t · c) 03:57, 10 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Okay Incognito Fedora ( talk) 04:00, 10 December 2023 (UTC) reply

They are made to change the color legend itself but not the image and I know this because of a certain user who made the template and told me. Happy editing! User:CycloneIns ( ❓) 04:35, 11 December 2023 (UTC) reply

I see... Incognito Fedora ( talk) 04:43, 11 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Timeline of the 2024 North Indian Ocean cyclone season and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spiderone ^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:54, 15 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, Incognito Fedora! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 23:54, 15 December 2023 (UTC) reply

The article Cyclone Jasper you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Cyclone Jasper for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jasper Deng -- Jasper Deng ( talk) 09:02, 16 December 2023 (UTC) reply

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Timeline of the 2024 North Indian Ocean cyclone season. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa ( talk) 15:05, 16 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Timeline of the 2024 North Indian Ocean cyclone season, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa ( talk) 15:05, 16 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Hi there. Given the storm’s low intensity, I don’t think an article is required for the storm right away. Perhaps wait to see what the storm does before making an article. Hurricanehink mobile ( talk) 05:58, 17 December 2023 (UTC) reply

So for 1976, start with the season articles for each basin, for the total number of storms. The tricky part is going to be sourcing everything, especially if the articles haven’t been written to GA/FA standards. I like the effort of making some older “tropical cyclones in 19XX”, and they are all going to take a lot of time. For SWIO, check the same archive that’s used in seasons in the 1980s, where there is an archive going back to the 1960s. The JTWC will have a lot for the WPAC, at least for starters. The North Indian Ocean might be tricky. Start with the storms that cause the most damage and deaths, and then work your way down. Hurricanehink mobile ( talk) 23:52, 18 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Okay. Thanks for the help! 🎩Incognito Fedora🎩 ( talk) 00:10, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Of course. It’s not easy making these big articles. I’ve been doing a lot of articles like Weather of 2003. It takes a lot of time getting all of the details and referencing right. Hurricanehink mobile ( talk) 03:38, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Could you review my current work on the draft? 🎩Incognito Fedora🎩 ( talk) 04:32, 19 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Hi NeoMadness, apologies for not getting back to you sooner but I can indeed point you in the direction of several sources for Lewis including the JTWC & Hong Kong Observatory. I would also strongly suggest that you take information from these two Tropical Cyclone Weekly Summaries that were written back in the day by a certain Jack Beven. I would also suggest that you consult IBTRACS, the Wikipedia Library and various news articles as you never quite know what you might find. Good luck and if you need any further help, please feel free to ask and I will get back to you as soon as I can. Jason Rees ( talk) 19:49, 22 December 2023 (UTC) reply

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Tropical Storm Haitang (2011). Thanks! Robert McClenon ( talk) 05:04, 24 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Please check the short description. Should it say 2011? Robert McClenon ( talk) 05:04, 24 December 2023 (UTC) reply

I am sad to see a newer and great editor like you retire so soon. Hope you can come back soon. 🍙 🌀 Cyclone Ins ✉ 03:03, 1 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Tropical Storm Haitang (2011), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Beland ( talk) 04:42, 4 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks! ''Flux55'' ( talk) 18:04, 5 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{ unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Comments: Ponyo ^{bons mots} 22:31, 5 March 2024 (UTC) reply

• See also User talk:Flux55.-- Ponyo ^{bons mots} 22:31, 5 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Draft:Tropical Storm Lewis (1993), a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Tropical Storm Lewis (1993) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Tropical Storm Lewis (1993) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Drdpw ( talk) 02:34, 6 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Draft:Typhoon Choi-wan (2003), a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Typhoon Choi-wan (2003) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Typhoon Choi-wan (2003) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Drdpw ( talk) 02:37, 6 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Draft:Tropical Storm Haitang (2017), a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Tropical Storm Haitang (2017) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Tropical Storm Haitang (2017) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Drdpw ( talk) 02:40, 6 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Draft:Tropical Storm Kong-rey, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Tropical Storm Kong-rey and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Tropical Storm Kong-rey during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Drdpw ( talk) 02:42, 6 March 2024 (UTC) reply