This is a Wikipedia
user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Betty_Logan. |
|
||||||||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Do you think we really need all the sources archivied? I don't think so, expecially the sources in the top 50, the grosses from the archivied sources don't match with the actual grosses, for example the archivied version of Avatar 2 says $434.5 million.... So for me they are useless. By the way, there are new issues....-- Luke Stark 96 ( talk) 00:27, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Betty, was hoping to lean on your expertise over a concern regarding two recent edits here and here. BOM reports the total box office haul as $668 mil, while NUM reports $670.1 mil. How is it typically worded in prose when there's a conflict like that, and would we insert a range in the infobox? -- GoneIn60 ( talk) 10:16, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
I was combing through the biggest bomb list and came across Pixels, which is listed at $75 million. So I added this to the article. However, after taking a closer look at the source, it was published before the China release when the film was sitting at $182 million gross. The film ended up grossing $244 million, so wouldn't we need a more recent source to rely on this figure? -- GoneIn60 ( talk) 00:16, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello Betty, how are you doing ?. I have noticed a change to the above only yesterday. In the infobox where it says Tournament Wins in green, it used to say ranking and the number (of wins across from it) and minor-ranking and the number (of wins across from it) below. In the last week or so it has been changed under the banner Tournament Wins it now says ranking wins and the number and minor-ranking Wins and the number. There is no need to add the word wins underneath as it is used in the line above in Tournament Wins. This was not approved on the talkpage or even mentioned. So who decided to change it and why was it changed please ?. Hope you can help. 178.167.150.13 ( talk) 21:04, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for changing it back. it looked pathetic with the change he made. Can you block him for disruption if he keeps it up ?. I will keep an eye on it incase he changes it again. Thanks again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.167.150.13 ( talk) 00:24, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
A very happy Christmas and New Year to you! | |||
Have a great Christmas, and may 2024 bring you joy, happiness – and no trolls, vandals or visits from
Krampus!
|
Hello Betty how are you doing ?. Betty can you update the above page please ?. It still says Ronnie has 39 ranking titles and 21 triple crowns. Nobody updated the page after the UK. Can you change this please ?. Thank you 178.167.188.7 ( talk) 16:43, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello Betty, I'm Horrorlover1026, and I hope you're having a good day. I found a credible link to a Film Industry Act of Bulgaria at the Film Center's website which was put into effect in May 2020, which I translated into English. On page 28, it states that persons under the age limit for the categories "C, C+, and D+" must be accompanied in order to view the film. I'm telling you this because I don't know how to add a link myself. Here's the link: file:///C:/Users/seths/Downloads/ZFI_02032021.pdf Horrorlover1026 ( talk) 05:12, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
I wish that you may have a very Happy Holiday!
Whether you celebrate
Christmas,
Hanukkah,
Kwanzaa,
Hogmanay,
Festivus or your hemisphere's
Solstice, this is a special time of year for almost everyone! May the New Year provide you joy and fulfillment! Thanks for everything you do here.
★Trekker (
talk) 12:42, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{ subst: User:Coffee/Holidays}} to your fellow editors' talk pages.
★Trekker ( talk) 12:42, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024! | |
Hello Betty Logan, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Trailblazer101 ( talk) 20:07, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Lord Sjones23 (
talk -
contributions) is wishing you
Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's
Solstice or
Christmas,
Diwali,
Hogmanay,
Hanukkah,
Lenaia,
Festivus or even the
Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{ subst: User:WereSpielChequers/Dec19b}} to your friends' talk pages.
Lord Sjones23 (
talk -
contributions) 06:31, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
Hi Betty how are you doing ?. Can you add the above event to the 2023/24 snooker season calendar please ?. It was the first event of the season for the World Seniors Tour . It was played on one day 29 December 2023. It was staged at Epsom Racecourse in Epsom, England. Stephen Hendry beat Jimmy White 1-0 in the final. It is similar to the Snooker Shootout but the frame lasts for 15 minutes instead of 10. 15 minutes is 900 seconds hence the name. Can you add this event to the World Seniors Tour section please ?. It was live on Channel 5 in the UK. Thank you 92.251.180.135 ( talk) 08:53, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
I'd hate to ask, but would you be willing to weigh in on Talk:Horror film about a proposed writing on a genre? Andrzejbanas ( talk) 13:29, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Note: It is good practice to leave a note at the discussion itself about notifications which have been made, particularly if made to individual users." This was not done. And despite seeing my request that we summarize first, you went ahead and did the pings without waiting. This would have been the perfect opportunity to say, "I ignored your recommendation GoneIn60, and went ahead and pinged Erik and Betty directly." At least if you did that, it wouldn't have felt like it flew under the radar. Besides, no one wants to be pinged to a WP:WALLOFTEXT.There may be points you still disagree with, and that's fine. We don't need to continue this here on Betty's talk page and spam her notifications. Drop me a note on my talk page if further responses are needed. -- GoneIn60 ( talk) 01:41, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi Betty, I just want let you know that I won't be longer active on en.wiki, I don't have time anymore to do my edits here, so I just want to say thank you very much for your advices, your help and your kindness through this years. Have a nice day and good luck with your life (on and outside Wikipedia), bye :)-- Luke Stark 96 ( talk) 13:51, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi @ Betty. There's recent discussion about production company/distributor. Feel free to comments. Regards. 2402:1980:824C:E039:0:0:0:1 ( talk) 12:08, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Tarzan (1999 film) § Plot rewrite. Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 05:51, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Look. I apologize for the edits on Motion Picture Association film rating system. However, when it stated that nudity is restricted to PG and above, some G rated films has this type, including Against a Crooked Sky and Hans Christian Andersen's The Little Mermaid, but I've seen that you have proven me wrong. Also, I won’t revert any edits that were corrected by signed users. If there’s any problems with my edits, please just let me know. Just be easy on me. I have Asperger Syndrome. Retrosunshine2006 talk 21:52, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello there, my addition did pass verification and the entry for the movie was updated. Why not keep it added, it is justified now. Firekong1 ( talk) 13:04, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello there, I noticed that you reverted my edits and claimed that it was "not in the source from what I can tell." The source is the actual physical magazine on pp.34-37; the link is an official on-line teaser produced by the editor of the magazine, or intro, as stated: "The following is from the introduction to LIFE’s new special issue on Superman, available at newsstands and online." It was referenced in case the reader would like to purchase the material and view the actual material; one could say that the actual content is behind a pay wall. Possible solutions: I could delete the link in the footnote; or include proper verbiage to state that it is behind a paywall; however, deleting the link may be a disservice to the reader who may want to have a convenient way to access said material or even point them in the right direction. Lastly, your claim that "Financially there was a lot riding on the film" is not sourced. MiztuhX ( talk) 15:20, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello there, this is a notice that I reverted your revert of my edit on the Superman (1978 film) article and that a discussion re: said topic can be found at /info/en/?search=Talk:Superman_(1978_film)#Disputed_%E2%80%93_Discuss
MiztuhX ( talk) 04:16, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
References
Hi. Is there really nothing that can be saved for the article? Maybe a single sentence about intellectual blockbusters or a single example? Surely some of the references are suitable enough to include something? -- 62.166.252.25 ( talk) 04:31, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Why did you revert my edits? I thought they were correct according to the sources! No name, just thought I could fix some errors in this website ( talk) 21:21, 26 April 2024 (UTC)