Hello, Behind the moors, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.

• Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
• Check out some of these pages:
  • Contributing to Wikipedia
  • Introduction to Wikipedia
  • How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
  • The five pillars of Wikipedia | Cheatsheet of WikiCode

• If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy ( talk) 05:57, 2 April 2021 (UTC) reply
  
  
  
  

==References==
{{Reflist}}

The article El Kureimat Power Plant has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DoubleGrazing ( talk) 05:14, 8 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Heroes of Might and Magic IV (card game)

added links pointing to Environment and Players

CAT Roorkee

added a link pointing to College of advanced technology

Joseph Calata

added a link pointing to PSE

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 05:57, 29 May 2021 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Draft:Hoda Abdel Nasser requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.hindustantimes.com/world/nasser-s-daughter-house-raided/story-wfZGYFF8uLf7F0dG50C8nM.html, https://www.egypttoday.com/Article/4/39859/Release-of-1st-Arabic-version-of-Gamal-Abdel-Nasser-biography, and https://www.jpost.com/Middle-East/Egypts-presidential-offspring-patch-up-cat-fight-150202. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Asartea ^{Talk | Contribs} 07:01, 31 May 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm Justiyaya. I noticed that in this edit to Draft:Hoda Abdel Nasser, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Justiyaya ( talk) 09:35, 31 May 2021 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Heroes of Might and Magic IV (card game), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Environment and Players.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:14, 5 June 2021 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Landscape conservation cooperatives

added links pointing to Human development and Stakeholder

Sivaji Bandyopadhyay

added links pointing to Indian languages and H2S

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:55, 20 June 2021 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Landscape conservation cooperatives, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Human development.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:57, 27 June 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the work you do cleaning up pages that shouldn't be here. Saying this, I'm not sure what you nominated Snyk not just for deletion but speedy deletion. How exactly does it satisfy WP:G11? It's exclusively promotional?? Which part of it isn't written in a neutral tone? MaskedSinger ( talk) 09:45, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

MaskedSinger It's purely based on funding and announcement, nor it seems notable. Behind the moors ( talk) 16:07, 3 December 2021 (UTC) reply

You don't think a billion dollar company is notable? MaskedSinger ( talk) 15:39, 4 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Wikipedia doesn't work like that. Check this afd [1] even, people are discussing that this billionaire is notable or not. Luckily, she is notable. Behind the moors ( talk) 09:55, 5 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Hi Behind the moors! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Apartment & Buildings, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{ bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot ( talk) 19:01, 12 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Hi, I'm guessing that this was a mis-click in Twinkle? It isn't a biography, and there are references, so BLPPROD isn't applicable. I draftified it again because it has serious issues, which had been ignored by the editor who moved it into mainspace without a review. So I'm not debating the fact that you thought it was not good enough, just the actual tag you placed. -- bonadea contributions talk 15:45, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

By mistakenly I chose the wrong option. Behind the moors ( talk) 17:11, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Hi there, My recent article Nikhil Prasad was nominated by you as it's not meet's GNG. Did you check the additional notability for people? SEE WP:CREATIVE. As per this, he is falling under notability, also what's lacking for WP:GNG. Awaiting your response. Thank you. Happy editing. Onmyway22 talk 18:08, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

From nowhere it is passing WP:CREATIVE and it fails GNG due to in-depth, independent coverage related to him. It's mainly about company. Behind the moors ( talk) 18:42, 14 December 2021 (UTC) reply

@ Behind the moors: So do you think a person who meets additional criteria isn't notable? Also the company is the first ever digital platform in Kerala and established as the top digital company in the state. The company page and even the series' page is as notable as being on Wikipedia and it's here. So you it seems you didn't WP:BEFORE. I strongly recommend it to you before you nominate articles for discussion. There are additional criteria other than GNG. Happy editing Onmyway22 talk 02:10, 15 December 2021 (UTC) reply

These are not Wikipedia criteria and stop debating with me here. Let everyone and admin decide this now. Behind the moors ( talk) 08:11, 16 December 2021 (UTC) reply

Hi - the acquisition of Chelsea FC is the single most important transaction in the world at the moment. That is why I worked on it. Why is the article of Ricardo Santos Silva proposed for deletion? I was certainly not paid for it (I do not know this people) and the article looks fair. Sources are from very reliable media (BBC, SKY, etc). Please let me know how i can improve the article. Thanks and please let know

Thank you for your speedy review of my draft article, I really appreciate it. Please could you give me some pointers as to whether the article generally needs more citations to provide adequate coverage, or generally needs citations from a difference source (i.e. not the due process international standards body that published the standard), or is there is something that I've missed like an uncited fact that I could just delete. Many thanks for making this article better.

Mrmxf ( talk) 13:01, 28 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Mrmxf, Check the draft, half of the content is not supporting any source. Please add sources to the Intro section, Architecture section, History section. Behind the moors ( talk) 16:32, 28 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Got it. Many thanks for the speedy response. I'll get onto it.... 86.139.171.7 ( talk) 16:53, 28 March 2022 (UTC) reply

You asked in an AFC comment whether DS Tucanae A and DS Tucanae A b were the same or different, and said that if they were different, then the draft should be accepted as being about a planet. They are different. DS Tucanae A is the star, one of two stars in a double star system, the one that the planet orbits. I marked the draft on the planet as under review and was planning to accept it, but the draft disappeared, with a message that it had been deleted by a G7 request. I don't know why the originator tagged the draft for deletion. Robert McClenon ( talk) 21:02, 28 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Your creation Draft:Tamdi Surla Falls seems well-intentioned but problematic. As a sample, I choose one section, which currently reads: Surla is about 45km east of the district of Ponda. And 27km from Panaji. The connectivity of public transport from either districts is weak. Therefore, it is best to arrange private transportation. Vehicles can reach up to the Tambdi Surla Mahadev Temple. However, rest of the way to the waterfall is on foot. It's not clear how much of the text that ends "Tambdi Surla Mahadev Temple" is sourced to the Times of India article, but there's a clear implication that the fifth and last of the sentences is sourced there. However, I can't find it stated within the ToI article that vehicles can reach the Tambdi Surla Mahadev Temple. Also: "Weak" by what standard, and according to whom? Who says that arranging public transportation is best?

For the entire draft, the cited sources are Wikipedia and various articles in the Times of India. However, Wikipedia is not a reliable source; and, despite its age and august title, The Times of India probably isn't one either.

Tamdi Surla Falls may be notable (by Wikipedia's criteria); I don't know -- I haven't started to look for sources. But in anything like its current form, the draft seems less suited to an encyclopedia than to a travel guide. You might consider proposing it not for Wikipedia but instead for Wikivoyage. -- Hoary ( talk) 22:58, 28 March 2022 (UTC) reply

As per WP:GEO it is notable topic. Don't worry, your concern is valid. I will fix it, before moving it in mainspace. I generally, create rough draft before, and then curate it. Behind the moors ( talk) 05:26, 29 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Hi Behind the moors! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Promo Content Understanding, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{ bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot ( talk) 19:01, 31 March 2022 (UTC) reply

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Misuse_of_powers ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 19:28, 12 April 2022 (UTC) reply

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for technical and behavioural evidence of abuse of multiple accounts (see GA99), obvious gaming behaviours to inflate your edit count and likely involvement in WP:UPE.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{ unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   Jezebel's Ponyo ^{bons mots} 20:33, 12 April 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Jamjir Falls, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- Minorax^{«¦ talk¦»} 01:10, 20 April 2022 (UTC) reply