Please remember to
sign your messages on
talk pages by typing four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question.
However, there is a small issue with your username. As it is in a non-
Latin alphabet script it may not display correctly for many other users. Although usernames like yours are not prohibited, Wikipedia's
signature guideline and
username policy encourage you, as a courtesy to other users, to alter your signature so that it also includes a transliteration of your username using Latin characters, so others can see it correctly. For the how-to of tailoring your username, please see
WP:CUSTOMSIG.
Thanks, and feel free to message me about anything.
Yashovardhan (
talk) 16:30, 29 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Speedy deletion nomination of Bengal Aerotropolis Projects Limited
Hello খাঁ শুভেন্দু,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged
Bengal Aerotropolis Projects Limited for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on
my talk page if you have questions.
Hello, I'm
BilCat. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
West Bengal, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the
referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
BilCat (
talk) 07:49, 26 March 2017 (UTC)reply
Please stop your language-warring - I have had to revert most of your recent edits. Promoting one language over others, by deleting other languages, re-ordering languages and making unsourced language additions, are considered vandalism and will be reverted. Continuing to language-war will lead to you being blocked - so please don't - thanks -
Arjayay (
talk) 19:11, 12 April 2017 (UTC)reply
Disambiguation link notification for April 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
List of longest bridges in West Bengal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
Kalyani. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the
FAQ • Join us at the
DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
opt-out instructions. Thanks,
DPL bot (
talk) 09:56, 17 April 2017 (UTC)reply
Disambiguation link notification for May 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
Baahubali (character), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
Indian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the
FAQ • Join us at the
DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
opt-out instructions. Thanks,
DPL bot (
talk) 10:07, 4 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from
Mayurakshi River into
Massanjore Dam. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. —
Diannaa🍁 (
talk) 20:56, 7 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Wikipedia editor
Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thanks for taking the time and trouble to create this - it's appreciated. It's now been reviewed and has had some improvement tags added. If you have the time, could you look it over and see if you can help address any of the issues raised in the tags? Thanks again for your hard work.
You may want to consider using the
Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on
Koushani Mukherjee (Actress), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under
section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a
deletion discussion, such as at
Articles for Deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by
visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request
here.
Boleyn (
talk) 17:56, 22 May 2017 (UTC)reply
I've just tagged the page, using our
page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The article needs to be expanded. Please expand it by adding more content
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on
my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at
the Teahouse.
Hello! খাঁ শুভেন্দু,
you are invited to the
Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us!
Yashovardhan (
talk) 16:37, 29 May 2017 (UTC)reply
Hello, খাঁ শুভেন্দু. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started,
Jangalkanya Setu, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on
the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on
my talk page if you have questions.
—usernamekiran
(talk) 00:06, 14 June 2017 (UTC)reply
Remember to always
sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the
edit toolbar or by typing four
tildes~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your
signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a
timestamp.
The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to
have some fun!
To get some practice editing you can
use a sandbox. You can create your own private sandbox for use any time. Perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click
here to start it.
You may want to consider using the
Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on
2017 Baduria-Basirhat riots requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under
section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the
help or
reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see
Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on
notable subjects and should provide references to
reliable sources that
verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by
visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request
here.
Cahk (
talk) 07:19, 19 July 2017 (UTC)reply
I've just tagged the page, using our
page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This needs additional references.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on
my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at
the Teahouse.
You must put spaces after your punctuation. Commas, periods, everything. I'm fixing
Farakka Port. --
Jennica✿ / talk 07:29, 26 July 2017 (UTC)reply
Ways to improve Sadarghat Bridge
Hi, I'm Boleyn. খাঁ শুভেন্দু, thanks for creating
Sadarghat Bridge!
I've just tagged the page, using our
page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please improve this article.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on
my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at
the Teahouse.
Please check the numbers in
Asansol Metropolitan Area. I cannot see where the reference verifies the population, but presumably that can be fixed in due course. However, the main issue at the moment is that this Wikipedia (enwiki) groups digits by three: twelve million three hundred forty five thousand = 12,345,000. That should be done in all the numbers, but particularly in {{
IndiaCensusPop}} where the commas are causing a script error. Thanks.
Johnuniq (
talk) 04:18, 10 August 2017 (UTC)reply
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by
visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.
Robert McClenon (
talk) 16:01, 11 August 2017 (UTC)reply
A tag has been placed on
File:Kolkata Port (2).png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under
section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a
non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the
non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the
fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{
Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by
visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. –
Train2104 (
t •
c) 23:17, 17 August 2017 (UTC)reply
A tag has been placed on
File:Hooghly Shipping and Engineering.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under
section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a
non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the
non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the
fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{
Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by
visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. –
Train2104 (
t •
c) 23:17, 17 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Orphaned non-free image File:Kolkata Port (2).png
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Kolkata Port (2).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
I noticed your recent edit to
Howrah does not have an
edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences →
Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Edits like
here for example, should be explained.220ofBorg 06:42, 22 August 2017 (UTC)reply
Indic script
Please stop adding Indic script to our articles, as you have at
Basirhat. As you are well aware, we do not allow Indic script in our articles on Indian subjects, as per the consensus at
WP:INDICSCRIPT. Any pre-existing Indic scripts should be removed entirely. Please do not just remove other scripts, leaving the Bengali, as you did
here -
Arjayay (
talk) 08:02, 11 September 2017 (UTC)reply
October 2017
Hello, I'm
Yamaguchi先生. I noticed that you made a change to an article,
Mondo Meyer Upakhyan, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the
referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Yamaguchi先生 (
talk) 18:37, 11 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's
talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents
consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an
appropriate noticeboard or seek
dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary
page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be
blocked from editing.Muhandes (
talk) 23:21, 31 October 2017 (UTC)reply
The article will be discussed at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asansol Metropolitan Area until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Batternut (
talk) 17:08, 13 November 2017 (UTC)reply
November 2017
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent addition of unsourced content, refusal to discuss. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to
make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the
guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Yamaguchi先生 (
talk) 22:08, 14 November 2017 (UTC)reply
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, খাঁ শুভেন্দু. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Wikipedia editor
Abishe just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Hello খাঁ শুভেন্দু: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand
Wikipedia. Cheers,
Abishe (
talk) 03:43, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
Please don't use the INRConvert template in article infoboxes or lead sections. There was a discussion on
WP:ICTF some time ago and the consensus was to use the templates only in the article body. Thank you. Ravensfire (
talk) 15:45, 29 December 2017 (UTC)reply
The article will be discussed at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dev (actor) filmography until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff) 02:25, 4 January 2018 (UTC)reply
The article will be discussed at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transport in Asansol until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -
MrX 15:27, 6 January 2018 (UTC)reply
It is not just references. Any new destination requires a firm date. Please familiarize yourself with
WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT. I remember mentioning this many times in my reverts. You still seem to ignore all these despite that. —
LeoFrank Talk 08:42, 27 April 2018 (UTC)reply
As I mentioned above, even if sourced, a firm date is required. Please take some time in reading the guideline cited above. Also, please use {{
ping}} instead of copy-pasting my signature. —
LeoFrank Talk 09:04, 27 April 2018 (UTC)reply
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
An article you recently created,
MV SSL Kolkata disaster, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. The article is written in poor English, is unclear and incomplete. I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the
Articles for Creation template atop the page.
Cwmhiraeth (
talk) 09:47, 30 June 2018 (UTC)reply
July 2018
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent addition of unsourced content, refusal to discuss. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to
make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the
guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Iluvkotha (
talk) 6:59, 30th June, 2018 (UTC)
I noticed your recent edit to
List of highest-grossing Bengali films does not have an
edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The
summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences →
Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks! North America1000 15:56, 4 August 2018 (UTC)reply
Hello, I'm
Northamerica1000. I noticed that you recently removed content from
List of highest-grossing Bengali films without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks. North America1000 15:57, 4 August 2018 (UTC)reply
When making significant changes / content removals to articles, while not mandatory, you really should use an edit summary. Without an edit summary stating what you're doing, those patrolling recent changes may revert your edits, because it's entirely unclear why content was removed/changed. Thanks for your consideration. North America1000 16:38, 4 August 2018 (UTC)reply
A page you started (Matarbari Port) has been reviewed!
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to
Badsha – The Don. Your edits could be interpreted as
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please
cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's
talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the
sandbox. Thank you. --
Worldbruce (
talk) 06:04, 9 August 2018 (UTC)reply
You were warned not to add Indic script to our India-related articles, on 11 September 2017, and were given a final warning about this on 3 May 2018. I note you have started re-adding it yet again. Please stop before you are blocked. Thank you -
Arjayay (
talk) 09:41, 26 August 2018 (UTC)reply
The article will be discussed at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2018 UY Aviation King Air C90 crash until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
SD0001 (
talk) 09:35, 1 September 2018 (UTC)reply
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, খাঁ শুভেন্দু. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, খাঁ শুভেন্দু. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at
this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.
Dolotta (
talk) 14:52, 2 January 2019 (UTC)reply
The article will be discussed at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luwang Air until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Tyw7 (
🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (
ping me) 19:19, 16 January 2019 (UTC)reply
March 2019
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be
used abusively. It has been
blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be
reverted or
deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the
guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.
Administrators:Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by
administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's
privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an
IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee
may be summarily desysopped.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
blocking policy).
Why blocking me? Did I misuse the Wiki policy?? ......... And if I really misuse the policy, sorry for that. I want to quickly return to Wikipedia.
খাঁ শুভেন্দু (
talk) 14:42, 7 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the
guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{
unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
blocking policy).
I have been blocked, because CheckUser Proof has determined that this user account has been or may be used abusively. But if you look at my edit history, then you will see that I have not done any abusive editing/promotional editing. I use Jio and Vodafone net from India. The IP address of the mobile company is not stable like the IP address of the WiFi, so the IP of the service provided to the user is changed frequently. I think the IP of any other user is mixed with my IP. Because of which I was blocked. But I did not use any more accounts. I am requesting for unblock my account.
খাঁ শুভেন্দু (
talk) 03:55, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
@
Yunshui:, @
Yamla:reply
My unblock request are not review in two weeks. .... I am wetting for review. I am used different Wi-Fi in different times. I am also used railway station's Wi-Fi for editing Wikipedia. Also used hotels Wi-Fi for editing Wikipedia on stay in hotel for Wikipedia metup. So, I think my user id and another two user id used internet same Wi-Fi for editing Wikipedia. So, unlock me for editing Wikipedia. ....Thanks.
খাঁ শুভেন্দু (
talk) 06:13, 7 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Decline reason:
Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficiently convincing for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request.
Yamla (
talk) 14:10, 18 May 2019 (UTC)reply
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the
guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{
unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Administrator note Responding to the updated comment left above on 7 July, খাঁ শুভেন্দু|খাঁ শুভেন্দু, you don't seem to understand the comments left by Yamla. Nobody was going to review your unblock request in 2 weeks. Your request had already been declined. @
Yunshui: do you care to respond to the user's suggestion that their habit of using multiple public IPs is likely what got them mixed up in this? Regards,
Cyphoidbomb (
talk) 15:31, 8 July 2019 (UTC)reply
I have no idea about IP address. ......... These technical issues are less understood. ......... However, I do not use any other user account than '"
User:খাঁ শুভেন্দু". ...... I do not know how my account IP was mixed with any other account. ......... I want to go back to the wiki quickly. ......... Greetings to all.
খাঁ শুভেন্দু (
talk) 16:43, 8 July 2019 (UTC)reply
খাঁ শুভেন্দু is definitely an editor who is trying to improve Wikimedia projects (specially Bengali Wikipedia). I know him personally and met him in a few Wiki meetups and workshops. It seems he is not understanding the process. My question to him (below) is also unanswered. I would also be interested to know if "using multiple public IP" is an issue here. --
Titodutta (
talk) 17:55, 8 July 2019 (UTC)reply
Help
Hello খাঁ শুভেন্দু, you contacted me today morning for help that's why I am writing this here. Firstly, you need to read the block message carefully. Your account is blocked for abuse. So first think of any abuse deliberately or mistakenly caused. You might be the best person to tell that. There are 3 important links,
CheckUser. It also provides a link to
Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks help page. Please read the page. Your last unblock request was not complete and convincing. Please also read "Decline reason:" above. Regards. --
Titodutta (
talk) 07:02, 8 March 2019 (UTC)reply
Kazi Nazrul University
Hello sir, I requesting you to please update the
Kazi Nazrul University,
Asansol Wikipedia article. It almost 7 years old and still not updated. Take it as you mini project update it. Thanks regards.
Kulbhushan Jhadav (
talk) 19:32, 15 October 2019 (UTC)reply
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a
Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Kalyani, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You have been warned multiple times about manual of style issues, but
I suppose you were not aware of
MOS:INDICSCRIPT.Muhandes (
talk) 10:38, 9 January 2020 (UTC)reply
The article will be discussed at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Svetlana Gulakova until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
S. M. Nazmus Shakib (
talk) 09:21, 11 January 2020 (UTC)reply
Disambiguation link notification for February 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
Golondaaj, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
SVF (
check to confirm |
fix with Dab solver). Such links are
usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the
FAQ • Join us at the
DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
opt-out instructions. Thanks,
DPL bot (
talk) 13:04, 6 February 2020 (UTC)reply
WikiProject Asia
Hello খাঁ শুভেন্দু. You have been invited to join WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge, a
WikiProject dedicated to improving the
Asia-related articles on Wikipedia. You received this invitation due to your interest in, or edits relating to or within the scope of the project. If you would like to join or just help out a bit, please visit the
project page, and add your name to the
participants.
If you know someone who might be interested, please invite them by:
Hello, I'm
Yak79 2.0. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
List of metro systems, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. References have been added/updated for this edit, but
including a citation is always needed - not for nothing,
WP:Verifiability is one of our
core content policies - and not doing it is remarkably harmful when you're updating a previously sourced information: leaving the old, outdated and no more useful references in place instead of updating/replacing them may mislead readers and other fellows editors to believe that the material is properly sourced and may prevent for addressing the issue.
Before leaving this warning, I read your talk page and saw that this is a recurrent topic, thus I strongly encourage you to have a look at the
content guideline, the
tutorial and the
help page on citing sources. Thank you.
Yak79 2.0 (
talk) 21:00, 15 February 2020 (UTC)reply
Hello খাঁ শুভেন্দু. You are invited to join the new WikiProject India 10,000 Challenge, a challenge which aims to see 10,000 improvements, destubs, and creations for Indian articles, covering every state of India and topic. Articles on all related topics are welcome. We need numbers to make this work and do something extraordinary for India on Wikipedia! Every 100 articles submitted will be copied into the wider Asian challenge. Sign up on the page if interested and start contributing! If you know someone who might be interested, please invite them by:
Apologies for the rollback, which was accidental - page jumped just as I was clicking on a wikilink to an article. Have undone that edit so your edit stands as you intended it.
Mjroots (
talk) 07:45, 31 October 2020 (UTC)reply
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)reply
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)reply
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
An article you recently created,
Jalpaiguri Government Medical College and Hospital, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Onmyway22talk 17:11, 5 January 2022 (UTC)reply
An article you recently created,
Jhargram Government Medical College and Hospital, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
TheBirdsShedTears (
talk) 11:48, 6 January 2022 (UTC)reply
An article you recently created,
Tamralipto Government Medical College and Hospital, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
TheBirdsShedTears (
talk) 11:52, 6 January 2022 (UTC)reply
An article you recently created,
Barasat Government Medical College and Hospital, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
TheBirdsShedTears (
talk) 11:58, 6 January 2022 (UTC)reply
Hello, খাঁ শুভেন্দু. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Jalpaiguri Government Medical College and Hospital, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can
request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.
FireflyBot (
talk) 13:06, 8 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Hello, খাঁ শুভেন্দু. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Jhargram Government Medical College and Hospital, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can
request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.
FireflyBot (
talk) 14:04, 8 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Hello, খাঁ শুভেন্দু. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Tamralipto Government Medical College and Hospital, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can
request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.
FireflyBot (
talk) 14:04, 8 June 2022 (UTC)reply
Hello, খাঁ শুভেন্দু. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Barasat Government Medical College and Hospital, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can
request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.
FireflyBot (
talk) 14:05, 8 June 2022 (UTC)reply
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can
request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. LizRead!Talk! 22:11, 5 July 2022 (UTC)reply
I appreciate you for creating the article —
2021–2022 Language Movement in Jharkhand. However this movement is not from 2021. Actually it was starting since the creation of the state. I assume that the most preferable title for this page would be Jharkhand language row and movement. Thank You
Your recent article submission to
Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be
moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be
nominated for deletion or
proposed for deletion.
If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to
Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to
create articles yourself without posting a request to
Articles for creation.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to
Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to
create articles yourself without posting a request to
Articles for creation.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to
Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to
create articles yourself without posting a request to
Articles for creation.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to
Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to
create articles yourself without posting a request to
Articles for creation.
Thanks for the article! Though the notability, see
WP:GNG,
WP:NFILM, IMHO is borderline; other than the press releases/routine announcements, there are two reviews from
The Telegraph (India) and
The Times of India. However, per the perennial sources list,
WP:RSP, the latter is marginally reliable. Unfortunately, my
WP:BEFORE didn't find any reviews that is significant coverage, so the notability is borderline, IMO.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|VickKiang}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username
DoubleGrazing, and I thank you for your contributions.
I wanted to let you know, however, that I've
proposed an article that you started,
Dighi Port, for deletion because it meets one or more of our
deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of
the article.
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.
If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on
the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by
other means.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|DoubleGrazing}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the
Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Hi খাঁ শুভেন্দু, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the
autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the
new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been
requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of
new page patrollers.
Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant
WikiProject templates,
stub tags,
categories, and
incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as
Rater and
StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's
core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a
new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at
this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia!
Hey man im josh (
talk) 16:37, 8 February 2023 (UTC)reply
Rollback granted
Hi খাঁ শুভেন্দু. After reviewing your request, I have temporarily enabled rollback on your account until 5 June 2023. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:
Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing
Twinkle or
RedWarn.
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see
Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my
talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing!
Airplaneman(talk)✈ 23:37, 5 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Orphaned non-free image File:Bose - The Untold Story of An Inconvenient Nationalist front cover.jpg
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:Bose - The Untold Story of An Inconvenient Nationalist front cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sengol until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alcazar Library arson attack until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit
the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (
talk) 01:02, 4 July 2023 (UTC)reply
August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by
visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. LizRead!Talk! 07:11, 11 October 2023 (UTC)reply
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by
visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. LizRead!Talk! 17:59, 13 October 2023 (UTC)reply
Thanks for your contributions to
Manush - Child of Destiny. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Does not meet
WP:NFF criteria.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at
Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ravensfire (
talk) 20:54, 30 October 2023 (UTC)reply
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)reply
Disambiguation link notification for February 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
Shantipur Handloom Industry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
Malda.
The problem with
your edit to
Tangail Saree (West Bengal) is not that it cites Prothom Alo. I agree with you that Prothom Alo is one of the most reputable newspapers in Bangladesh. The problem is that it cites an opinion piece (editorial, op-ed, or commentary). As the guideline on
reliable sources explains, an opinion piece is a reliable source for the writer's opinion, but is not a reliable source for facts.
The opinion piece claims that a journal article says something. Since the opinion piece shouldn't be cited for this, the usual solution would be to read the
journal article and cite it directly. That doesn't work in this case because the article is in Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, which is a
predatory journal - one of very low quality that has no meaningful peer-review. Such journals are
not reliable, and should not be cited on Wikipedia.
Rafsan Ghalib, the author of the opinion piece, is a mathematician working as a journalist who has published some poetry, so not remotely an expert on the economic history of the South Asian textile industry. If he had been an expert in the field, he would have known that the journal article he wrote about is junk. --
Worldbruce (
talk) 05:43, 26 February 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Worldbruce:Thanks for elaborating on the matter. However, it is true that after the
partition of British India on the basis of religion, incidents of religious persecution and violence occurred. Anyway, trying to find more reliable sources, will post here if found. –
খাঁ শুভেন্দু (
talk) 06:20, 26 February 2024 (UTC)reply
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angad Pratap until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
|
թարգմանություն
|
tərcümə
|
пераклад
|
অনুবাদ 
India,
|
превод
|
翻译
|
თარგმანი
|
μετάφραση
|
અનુવાદ
|
अनुवाद
|
ಅನುವಾದ
|
ການແປພາສາ
|
превод
|
भाषांतर करणे
|
перевод
|
превод
|
மொழிபெயர்ப்பு
|
అనువాద
การแปล
|
переклад
|
dịch
|
יבערזעצונג
Hello, I'm
Vinegarymass911. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Port of Chittagong has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Vinegarymass911 (
talk) 05:59, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Athens International Airport. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Dl2000 (
talk) 21:22, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Welcome খাঁ শুভেন্দু!
Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 47,330,240 registered editors!Hello, খাঁ শুভেন্দু. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions!Do be bold
Do assume good faith
Do be civil
Do keep cool!
Do maintain a neutral point of view
Don't spam
Don't infringe copyright
Don't edit where you have a conflict of interest
Don't commit vandalism
Don't get blocked
Fight vandalism
Be a WikiFairy or a WikiGnome
Help contribute to articles
Perform maintenance tasks
Become a member of a project that interests you
Help design new templates
button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes
Hello. Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia.
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Edits like
here for example, should be explained.
220
of
Borg 06:42, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Silchar.
Yamaguchi先生 (
talk) 20:18, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg)
.jpg)
,_cropped.jpg)
You are invited to join the discussion at
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force#Spicyonion.com.
Worldbruce (
talk) 13:46, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Administrator note Responding to the updated comment left above on 7 July, খাঁ শুভেন্দু|খাঁ শুভেন্দু, you don't seem to understand the comments left by Yamla. Nobody was going to review your unblock request in 2 weeks. Your request had already been declined. @
Yunshui: do you care to respond to the user's suggestion that their habit of using multiple public IPs is likely what got them mixed up in this? Regards,
Cyphoidbomb (
talk) 15:31, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
; see
Talk:Anjana River for reasons why
the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Aintabli --
Aintabli (
talk) 21:42, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
