![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi. You started the GAR review at Hong Kong Airlines, but you need to choose whether it should be an individual review or a community one. Just click on the one you want and it will open a new page. There you can say why you think it fails the WP:Good article criteria. If you choose individual you close it at the end. If you choose community someone else will close it. AIRcorn (talk) 23:03, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
Please welcome others in their talkpages instead of their userpages, thanks! I've moved most of them to the right place.-- 94rain Talk 09:40, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot ( talk) 18:00, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Because You write on aviation topics, I thought maybe it would be interesting for you to have cooperation writing articles about international aviation services companies. I have prepared texts and all needed secondary resources. Now I need Wikipedia experienced editor to review the article and successfully post it.
Could You help me with this freelance work or maybe you have someone to suggest?
Thank You in advance for Your help. I am looking forward to Your answer.
revision Latest revision as of 02:53, 23 May 2019 WikiAviator I had to remove your ref it leads only to a map you will have to find a secondary source and not American Airlines as to source ~ by the way nice meeting ~ let me know if I can help you in any way Mitchellhobbs ( talk) 13:29, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi - I was not sure why you removed the link to Moncreiffe House? Best wishes. Dormskirk ( talk) 07:09, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
Most of the remaining dates were postponed and then cancelled, so I thought it would be easier to just removed the pre-postponed dates and leave the ones that were eventually canceled. Also I changed the opening acts so that all could be on the table, instead of their own section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:802:8300:1475:817D:AE08:CCD9:B4B3 ( talk) 00:47, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
This site is constantly being sabotaged by someone with an axe to grind.
I have been attempting to place correctly sourced information on the site. The other person, who if you check their editing history, appears to be obsessed with and stalking Dr Patricia Petersen, the founder of the Australian Independents.
As a result, the person appears to be violating wiki policies, guidelines and codes of conduct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 111.220.222.2 ( talk) 01:06, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
Hi WikiAviator – I noticed you added a sockpuppet investigations report for Gabucho181 and requested a CheckUser. Just to let you know, CheckUsers are not allowed to publicly connect an account with an IP address, so your CheckUser request will likely be declined. In addition, I noticed the report didn't include any evidence showing why you think this IP is a sockpuppet. If you suspect this IP is a sockpuppet of Gabucho181, you should edit your sockpuppet investigations request to include evidence as to why you think that is the case. (Note that I am not an administrator or a CheckUser, nor am I a SPI clerk -- I just saw the open SPI case and decided to pass on this advice.) Much thanks, Aoi (青い) ( talk) 03:03, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
The IP edits here are a long-term, IP block evasion case. This is why IanDBeacon cited WP:BANREVERT here. (The IP user's extremely aggressive edit summaries were also a pretty good tip off.) I deleted their edit summaries, blocked the IP, and protected the page. There is no need to report users to ANEW for a single revert, especially when that revert is obvious vandalism. WP:AIV is a good place for urgent response to vandalism, WP:ANEW tends to have a somewhat slower response time and is for cases of edit warring, not vandalism. ST47 ( talk) 04:16, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
Hello, WikiAviator. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Acropolis Aviation".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CASSIOPEIA( talk) 15:40, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi WikiAviator. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! – Juliancolton | Talk 03:47, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
I'm simply an IP that due to the nature of general Wiki-filibustering of (often) poor ideas and (often) lack of knowledge does not believe in creating an account and I never will create an account. I sometimes stop by to fix bias in contentious articles (such as the one you found me on). Where trolls like to roam and push agendas (such as the deletion of all references to the country of Greece or Greek empire on Wikipedia). Thanks all the same but I will not be registering an account, now or ever. -- 2001:8003:6450:C400:9D72:3EB1:BC95:7F6D ( talk) 11:53, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for the warm welcome and the tips, it is much appreciated.
Thallactle ( talk) 04:06, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
Hello, WikiAviator, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Here are some pages which are a little more fun:
We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Note: Having a username change after you start using STiki will reset your classification count. Please let us know about such changes on the talk page page to avoid confusion in issuing milestone awards. You can also request for your previous STiki contributions to be reassigned to your new account name. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and ~~ OxonAlex - talk 12:53, 15 October 2019 (UTC) |
![]() |
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
Mz7 ( talk) 09:18, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
You have recently nominated a bunch of articles for deletion on the basis of dead links. Dead links aren't a reason for deletion, they're a reason to update the links. Some of your rationales verge on allegations of bad faith against the editors who created the articles - you appear to be implying that they are hoaxes because you can't be bothered to look for updated links. Please rethink your approach to deletion criteria before you make any more deletion nominations. Deletion nomination is not a way to force reference improvement. Acroterion (talk) 12:12, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:ZIPAIR Tokyo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 18:48, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
The article Kowloon Development Company has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Neither the given links nor my searches are showing anything to demonstrate notability. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
GSS
💬 12:45, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
The article Synergis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Neither the given links nor my searches are showing anything to demonstrate notability. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:GNG.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
GSS
💬 12:56, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kowloon Development Company is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kowloon Development Company until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GSS 💬 13:10, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
Is a marvellous way to think about things, if you are really serious about Edward Collinson as a delete candidate, then in practice, you have all of these to consider as well - https://tools.wmflabs.org/enwp10/cgi-bin/list2.fcgi?run=yes&projecta=Australian_politics&importance=Unknown-Class&quality=Stub-Class where in many cases they are not as carefully located in context as that of the editing of user Doug Butler. What I would suggest, either go for the lot, or none at all, to choose Dougs editing is a poor catch - as he is one of the more meticulous editors in the Australian project. Really from standard editing etiquette in the Australian project, and the subsidiary project of Politics, to have served as a politician is sufficient to stand alone without hindrance or prejudice. I trust you know how to withdraw gracefully. cheers. JarrahTree 07:03, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
Random for CSD is a very good way to go. However, just when you hit that article, it is a sore point for me, as I see articles in the Australian politics set that are nowhere as good as Doug's article. It is assumed someone who has served in public office in Australia that they are able to have an article, however poorly created.
As to your choice and confusion, sorry - it is up to you, I am challenging your prod against the issue of precedent as there are thousands of Australian article of lesser quality that do not get challenged at all. It is your option, leave it and wait till others respond, or withdraw it - all up to your judgement, it is because i have it on watch, and am impressed by the thoroughness of Doug as an editor, I am defending it - and will continue to do so in the knowledge of the other thousand or more articles that exist that are not as good. I have probably confused you further. cheers. JarrahTree 07:24, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
Sorry you have got it very very wrong - you do that, and there are thousands of others that are poorer quality, and you are confusing an issue - the Australian politics project has people that have served in public office, and there are articles should not be deleted by some other criterion. Otherwise the 'cherry picking' that is random, falls down where it fails to understand local context. JarrahTree 07:33, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
There is nothing that I can see in the entries possible in the Australian national library aggregator Trove that actually refute his notability, he was a significant person in Western Australia and South Australia...so your summary for prod, I beg to disagree JarrahTree 07:51, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi there. (1) Please confirm that you have read and understood Wikipedia:ORGDEPTH. (2) regarding the AfD source. Please do not repeat the links that you have already presented in your previous comments, doing so shows you in bad light, as it appears as though you are trying to pass 1 source as 2. -- DBig Xrayᗙ 12:51, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
-- DBig Xrayᗙ 07:41, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is
Possible Template:Ds/alert abuse by DBigXray.
Djm-leighpark (
talk) 13:11, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'd like to kindly request your assistance with the following article:
/info/en/?search=Draft:Black_Heart_Saints
It seems that you've rejected the article using the previous message that it received the last time it was reviewed, but provided no further insight. With each submission, I've added more internationally trusted sources to this article. Can you please elaborate more on what will be needed to approve this article? The subject is notable based on the inclusion of the band on the Billboard charts, internationally-known festivals, and awards.
Thanks for your time.
Athousanddaysbefore ( talk) 15:08, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
@ Athousanddaysbefore: As you can see, the sources you've added are no way "international", and the websites may not be credible and the coverage may be trivial (one-time mentions). Also, most sources are from Austin, which could not verify its notability since we need at least nation-wide sources. I biggest problem of your article is that the notability isn't proven therefore you have to work on gathering RS for the article to pass the AfC criteria. WikiAviator ( talk) 00:32, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
@ WikiAviator: Would these two satisfy the requirements? The following are two articles. One is from Vintage Guitar, a recognized print magazine based in the U.S. and the other is a print magazine based in the UK: https://www.vintageguitar.com/34632/sweetwater-studios-announces-recording-master-class-with-texas-hard-rockers-black-heart-saints/ https://devolutionmagazine.co.uk/2019/10/15/review-black-heart-saints-misery-ep/
@ Athousanddaysbefore: No, these are not credible. WikiAviator ( talk) 02:14, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
@ WikiAviator: How can you say these are not credible when one of them has a Wikipedia article? Athousanddaysbefore ( talk) 12:38, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Synergis, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. The only independent source is the SCMP, and that source is a very obvious press release slightly disguised as a newspaper article. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
DGG (
talk ) 04:00, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
I may do things out of sequence, but I keep track. I've moved Astranis back to draft. While checking, I also saw the article on Synergis. I moved that to draft also.
And are you also Use:IlysianCaryatid ? DGG ( talk ) 04:12, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
You have just posted a 1000 word diatribe against a fellow AfD contributor. This sort of behavior will not be tolerated again. You have been warned accordingly. Comment on the content, see WP:NPA-- ⋙–DBig Xrayᗙ 09:45, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi, thank you for your attention to my article. 1. You wrote that in my draft "Perspective Geological Correlation" "part of the article is copied from another Wikipedia article". The reference link points back to my article. 2. The last four months I am working on the article with wiki editor CaptanEek. Yesterday I published a new draft that contains 25 references. If you have more remarks, I will be glad to discuss them. Thank you. Nabatoff ( talk) 18:55, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
@ Nabatoff: Firstly, another Wikipedia article is not supposed to reference a draft. Please explain more about your point 1. Secondly, for the 25 references, some of them like geoworld are unwanted since they may not be credible. However, the books do look okay. But here the main problem is the lacking of citations, since your draft is indeed very very long, the references are clearly not sufficient since you need one reference per fact to probe that your facts are true. For example, in your introduction section, there is only one citation, which is clearly not enough. Feel free to contact me regarding the AfC submission:) WikiAviator ( talk) 00:31, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
Thank you. I will work on it. The matter of the article is very important because it is the only really geological quantitative law in the last century. Nabatoff ( talk) 07:26, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
I have added a few more references to this. Let me know if I need to add some more. M4DU7 ( talk) 10:22, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I maid changes in the article according your remarks: 1. I rewrote the Overview that had a part copied from wiki article "Lithostratigraphy". 2. I change the points of reference. Now the introduction has seven references, an all facts are supported with publications. I would like to mention that the length of the article is influenced by two factors, which were demanded by the first wiki editor CaptanEek: the article has to be understandable by a not professional, and the number of figures has to be decreased (which is difficult to compensate with words when describing a geometrical theory). I also disn't find the reference to the site "geoworld".Please, clarify. Are there any more remarks? Nabatoff ( talk) 19:09, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
-- 07:50, Monday, March 2, 2020 ( UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Hi WikiAviator. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group. Please check back at
WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as
patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the
New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at
New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the
deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the
new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. Barkeep49 ( talk) 17:33, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Hello. I'm trying to figure out how to create a page on the writer Jim Pascoe. I understand that wikipedia is not for author promotion, but several of his books already have article pages on this site. I guess i'm not sure what kind of reference you guys are looking for so that this page qualifies. I see a lot of other pages for other writers I'm into that don't have that much supporting reference. Can you please help? Thanks!
-geo
Geo.hegel70 ( talk) 18:15, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I'm MarkH21. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Ian Camfield, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
— MarkH21 talk 08:31, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
You are correct the sources are improved from when you reviewed the article. However, the four sources (not three) present adequately cited all the information and I see no inherent reason to be skeptical of the 19th century newspapers presented. I am not seeing a failure to verify the information which is what the tag suggests is a problem. Your comment suggests issues with notability. This puzzles me too. The claim to notability is strong if the facts are true. I'm not saying the article at the time of your review was perfect, but I think it more than adequate as a new article. Best, Barkeep49 ( talk) 04:16, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
May I please draw your attention to the fact that this was nowhere close to A1. A1 is for the cases one really can not identify the subject of the article. Here, it was clear what the article is about, and it also had two references. I declined the speedy, you are welcome to nominate the article at AfD, however, in the future be more careful please.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:44, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Hello there,
I am confused about the continuous rejections of the page I am trying to create. This laundry company is covered by the top 3 newspapers of Nigeria and they have published articles solely and exclusively about the company. Can you please clear this situation for me so I can understand what is it that I'm doing wrong? I will be thankful!
Cheers! Nayab.khawar93 ( talk) 10:43, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Page Link: /info/en/?search=Draft:Laundry_By_Time_Signature — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nayab.khawar93 ( talk • contribs) 10:48, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
I think reviews need to be more specific about what's original research. The article follows Arata Takeda's history of the problem. Only three things in it are not in Takeda's history, namely Murnaghan, Bouchard, and Heath. I take it that they could be added later though, after the piece might be accepted.
First issue is, it is difficult to tell if you think that even the earlier history compiled from Takeda does not count as a reliable third party source-- the information about Vettori, Castelvetro, Xavier and Lessing. I'm not Arata Takeda. He's a different person from me. I'm putting his history into the article so that his role is like that of a news journalist. Only Murnaghan, Bouchard and Heath are not in Takeda.
What if Murnaghan, Bouchard and Heath are deleted? Then if the article is accepted in Wikipedia, then later those other things from the history could -- potentially -- be added, and best by someone else?
The other issue is this. I think you may be making too much of Takeda's misinterpretation of Halliwell. Sometimes someone gets something wrong. There is a CONSENSUS that he is wrong, so that seems to justify mentioning this one fact. You are overreacting by saying it's original research. Cdg1072 ( talk) 16:24, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Doesn't help editors nor articles. Only makes them look ugly in the time being..♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:36, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
I've been writing articles for a decade. I know what I'm doing. I started writing this just a few minutes ago, give me a break. There's a lot more sources and information to add. ɱ (talk) 02:02, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
The bridge is the only single-tower S-shaped suspension bridge in the world.That is clearly a claim of notability. PROD is for articles that
obviously and uncontroversially does not belong in an encyclopedia. Please be more careful with your tagging. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 03:11, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi, can you please indicate why you tagged Johann Jimenez-Cohen as reviewed? It is a hoax, created by a brand-new editor and moved to mainspace by "another" brand-new editor who had previously created a rejected draft about the same person. Fram ( talk) 11:22, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi. As to the draft you just declined ( Draft:Israel Taekwondo Federation), I was wondering whether you looked at the talk page. There are a couple of reasons there. One (which because it is not the only one does not attract OTHERSTUFFEXISTS as an issue) is that other such national taewondo national organizations at the project also have similar or lower levels of references as this draft. Such as Austrian Taekwondo Federation, German Taekwondo Union, Italian Taekwondo Federation, Philippine Taekwondo Association, Ghana Taekwondo Federation, etc. Please look at them. I think that for Olympic-qualifying-national-sports organizations - certainly in this and similar sports - this is the common level of coverage in wp articles across the board. -- 2604:2000:E010:1100:F893:8426:4115:54F7 ( talk) 15:22, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Review of submission Wiki page Knoblich
Hi there, you mention that the problems are not solved - could you specify which problems weren't solved, please? We added references for the biography, linked to other Wikipedia pages, added references to the research focus. That section is more extensive than usual as it's the main focus of the article on Knoblich. Thanks!
IMBA wiki ( talk) 15:55, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi,
could you please specify where secondary sources are missing? The references listed all link to verifiable information on websites with good reputation. Thanks!
IMBA wiki ( talk) 15:59, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi, WikiAviator Thanks you have read the Brand activism draft I did. (here is the draft: /info/en/?search=Draft:Brand_activism?fbclid=IwAR0u5fzm8wvFjtD_Xb-3ZVAFNwSVxsG63w65YPRSpseUFORCN7gtJb8MKJ8 ) I see the draft is declined, for it looks similar to the Consumer activism article, but they are completely different concepts. While Consumer activism focuses on consumption and how goods or services are produced and delivered, Brand activism is a marketing and business management process by which businesses concern for the communities they serve and the world we live in. Consumer activism seeks to change the way in which goods or services are produced in order to make the production process safer, more ethical, more environmentally friendly, etc. Brand activism seeks to change society's biggest problem (such as economic injustice, education, healthcare, immigration etc. issues), using the economic power of the business. The Brand activism claims that today for the companies is not enough to offer good product and price, but they have to understand the long-term needs of the society and to solve global problems as economic problems, regulations, corruption, global warming, discrimination, education, healthcare, and etc. using the economic power they possess. Can you, please, give me advice on how to proceed? Thanx, Ivan
@WikiAviator, I've been told using a trout is considered too sharp, I didn't know it and it wan not what I meant, so I'm removing it from here. Thank you again reading the article and for the advice.
![]() |
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
You have been trouted for: YOUR REASON HERE EB-lgbtq ( talk) 07:59, 31 March 2020 (UTC) Dear WikiAviator,
Thank you for reviewing Draft:Rémy Bonny. I changed the wording so everything should be neutral now. I saw that other users also added a few changes. So I think it is ready for review. Please let me know your feedback.
Best, Evert-- EB-lgbtq ( talk) 07:59, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
Sizzle! The trout you used to slap another Wikipedian has been gutted, roasted over the coals, and served with tartar sauce. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that, just like the trout in this picture, your trouting of Wikipedians is overdone. |
@ EB-lgbtq: I'm glad that you've improved the article, however, the work is not thorough as biased phrases like "He has been exposing anti-LGBT hate during his work in Central and Eastern Europe" reflect a non-neutral point of view, as "anti-LGBT hate" is not defined clearly and is not neutral. Please consider refining these problems, for example, you could say that "He has been publicizing comments and works that he regards "hateful" and contrary to his sexual orientation and position", which would be more neutral. Also, DO NOT ask reviewers to review your article first. We review articles randomly using a script software and it wouldn't be fair to other authors if articles are picked instead of randomly generated. Thanks. WikiAviator ( talk) 08:53, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Ok got it! Thanks a lot! --
EB-lgbtq (
talk) 09:07, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
Hello, ok, this is your impression, i accept it, maybe you can help me to improve it too, being of Italian origin, am biased ;) however I have already changed something, if you want to take a look -- Football Missionary ( talk) 03:12, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Why did you tag Denis (YouTuber) for A7 Speedy Deletion, even though the article clearly contains secondary sources discussing the subject, and therefore, in my understanding, could not possibly be an A7? Devonian Wombat ( talk) 03:13, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello WikiAviator
I understood your message and I will look into the mistakes I've done and the sources I need to search. I will undeniably look into account the results I've garnered when I made the said page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WIZ*ONEI ( talk • contribs) 06:14, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi - regarding Wolves (Emma Blackery song), if you take a look at WP:A9, you'll see that both of the two criteria have to be met - no indication of significance (tick) and no article about any of the recording artists ( not tick). The sources in the article aren't enough to demonstrate notability, but I can't delete a page based on that alone, so I've declined your speedy request - please feel free to nominate at AfD however. Cheers GirthSummit (blether) 07:43, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
You nominated વિજયગીરી બાવા as an A2 deletion because Vijaygiri Bava exists.
You state that the sources I use are unreliable. The two sites I refer to are no mere statistical websites. They are the official webpage of the Icelandic Football Federation and the official webpage for the Icelandic State Radio. Regarding the first source (ksi.is), there are few other reliable sources on the subject (the Icelandic Women's Football league) and these are all official statistics released by the Icelandic Football Federation. Its a primary source. Maybe I could add some articles from the Icelandic media but that is all I can do to bolster this article.
Best regards. Pamfilus
4/10/2020
Hi there, I would like to understand better why you declined my draft since all the sources are very reliable sources and big in Israel as well as the FDA website. Please let me know which you think are promotional so I can remove them or explain them. thank you and stay safe these days! Shanisun ( talk) 14:33, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Please stop the edit-war you started on my user talk page. You're no longer welcome on it. The point you raised should have been raised at Talk:Aus der Tiefen rufe ich, Herr, zu dir and nowhere else. -- Francis Schonken ( talk) 14:29, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
Overall I think that your track record with reviewing articles has been quite good, but I did come across a few calls that you made that I'm not so sure about:
All in all keep up the good work, and don't hesitate to reach out to me or another experienced page reviewer if you need any help. signed, Rosguill talk 00:12, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for your feedback :) I will improve my cuaration and prevent such stuff from happening again. WikiAviator ( talk) 07:25, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
Don't use this tag for articles that contain no unreferenced material". NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 18:43, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
Gerda Arendt Francis Schonken Rosguill: OK, I know what you mean. Will tag more carefully and use the correct tags in the future (I haven't read the template documentation, I've only read the small description on the curation tool). I apologise for all that drama and I wouldn't post content disputes on ANI again. Sorry if this has disturbed you. BTW, I just think that WP:N is not proven with only one source, @ Francis Schonken so should I tag the page with that tag? Thanks. Happy editing everyone :) WikiAviator ( talk) 02:51, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
In other words, I completely disapprove of Gerda Arendt bringing the topic of that example up on a user talk page, and the false rationale that this content aspect only involves two or less people should be even more completely rejected. A few years ago I made clear to Gerda to not longer post on my user talk page for, among others, that reason. Recently she has been testing boundaries (e.g. asking me to start a talk page discussion which she perfectly could have started herself), and I think we're not far from me, again, asking her to stay away from my talk page, if I read her unacceptable "two people involved" defence above. -- Francis Schonken ( talk) 12:07, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
@ Francis Schonken: No, I strong disagree with that. What you're saying is a mere justification for people you hate to stay off your talk page to keep your page clean for an RfA or something (ppl will find out). Talk page is public space, it is your inbox but everyone should be allowed to edit. Most people have old enemies on Wikipedia, however, it doesn't mean you should lock them out, ask them to use the mainspace talk, and pretend not to see the discussion thread on the article talk page. I'm sure, for my case, that you wouldn't suddenly be engaged or active if I post it up on article talk, you would just ignore me and not utter a word, So that "testing boundary" thing isn't relevent. For the "edit war" justification, no, not relevant. According to WP policy, users are encouraged to resolve disputes among themselves, instead of firing out loud (I know I shouldn't have put this on ANI). So, for an edit war that only involves two parties, it would be better to talk about it on a user talk rather than the article talk. Therefore, in that specific move war, both sides should come up with a solution and post a note on the article talk page like "Note: Page movement between X and Y have been disputed". This would serve your purpose while not disrupting the normal article discussion process by other editors. Regarding your "content vs behavioural" point, true, but that's not a point of replying to Gerda, since Gerda means any disputes, which is not related to content or behavioural problems. Also, you should not revert talk page edits because doing such is destroying records. Once again, "banning" people from your talk page isn't a good idea since people will view you as anti-collaborative and hard to communicate with. Thanks. WikiAviator ( talk) 13:36, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
And what I'm doing is explaining to you, not the public. If you believe that I've tagged the wrong tag, you should be the one discussing on the article talk page, then pinging me. Now that I'm adding a section to your page because you reverted it without discussion, and I want your explanation. Get it? WikiAviator ( talk) 13:39, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Barkeep49, @ Girth Summit: Thanks for your feedback. @ Francis Schonken:, I have to make it clear that I'm not accusing you of anything. Calm down. People who have read the whole message should know this is not my core message. I'm just asking you not to do so in case you're trying to do this (although permitted, it is not recommended unless you feel it is offensive or has personal attacks. There are numerous essays (not policies) suggesting why you shouldn't polish your talk page). This is not escalation, this is just a response towards your accusation of Gerda of crossing the boundary. Sure, I can agree to disagree, but if I see other editors being accused of things that are false, then sorry I can't stay in silence and let that person get unfair treatment. Never. If you're the one who wants de-escalation, you should not be the one stirring up the arguement again and blaming others for responding. About the sound arguement thing, content disputes should be put on the article talk page, but what I'm mainly concerned is your revert, so that's why I'm putting it on your talk page. As suggested by the two admins, I don't have any power over anyone else when solving disputes, so please do not challenge my reviewer rights as you are supposed to treat me as a normal editor. Period. (To all editors: Reading the whole message in this thread before responding is highly appreciated) WikiAviator ( talk) 02:25, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
You guys are full of shit at Wiki. Look up John K Frost on your Wiki and tell me how mine is different. LOL Anthony.CT.ASCP ( talk) 23:49, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=John_K._Frost Anthony.CT.ASCP ( talk) 23:50, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Note: This user is currently extremely stressed due to real-life workloads, and they may be away for extended periods due to the lack of time, and should be back by mid-July. They may not be swiftly replying to queries since they may not check their talk page as often. For urgent matters, please email this user to get their attention as soon as possible. Thank you. WikiAviator ( talk) 03:31, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
Hi:
This submission you rejected as blank is, in fact a template, a campaign box. Look to the right and you should see the campaign box, or edit the draft and you can see the text.
Best,
Beyond My Ken ( talk) 05:45, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
""It's not mine, I was just letting you know. Beyond My Ken ( talk) 12:20, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello WikiAviator,
NPP Sorting can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ACPERM, your help could really make a difference.
In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=User:1292simon has "Rejected" my last submitted draft meaning I cannot do anything. I have edited the page to be as subjective and without any personal slant. I really feel the criteria being used for this draft is way more draconian than the large majority of Wikipedia pages out there.
As the above user does not seem to want to help further I am asking you as a previous reviewer to reconsider this page and/or advise how I can get it resubmitted?
Vladjanicek66 ( talk) 14:30, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your enquiry. As mentioned by previous reviewers, problems that are listed are not properly addressed.
Therefore, the reviewers are indeed trying to help, but the advice is simply ignored. Regarding whether you can do anything with your article, you are welcome to work on the rejected draft, and after you have addressed all the problems, please approach me first for me to see if it is okay before you resubmit. Note that such drafts will be reviewed with extra scrutiny and second opinion will be consulted. About your claim that AFC rules are too stringent, it is true that some articles have lower quality, but they are kept due to their notability and neutrality, and they of course need improvements. However for the case of your draft, NPOV violations and notability issues are the core problems, which may result in it being deleted should it be published. Here in AFC, it is our mission to ensure all articles published from AFC meet quality guidelines, and that if they were to be deleted, their AFD wouldn’t pass. Therefore, AFC is not draconian. I hope that this answers your queries. Should you have more questions, feel free to contact me at any time here, though I may not be able to reply quickly. Don’t hesitate to ask other experience editors at WP:Teahouse or at IRC, they are willing to help you! Happy editing! Yours, WikiAviator WikiAviator ( talk) 09:12, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi Tnx for your message I finished writing a page after learning how to do it well. Can you be nice and explain to me why it stayed in the Draft version? Thanks for your response All the best Mumi
Hi, i submited it for review, can you please take alook?
Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Synergis, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot ( talk) 02:55, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi WikiAviator, a few weeks ago I submitted changes to a draft article that you once declined, so I thought I might try to reach out to you for assistance if you may have a moment. The article in question is /info/en/?search=Draft:Black_Heart_Saints
The band is currently on the Billboard Charts (evidence is here: http://charts.bdsradio.com/bdsradiocharts/charts.aspx?formatid=54) and also was one of the few bands to perform at the Sturgis Motorcycle Rally. These facts, among others, should prove the subject to be worthy of inclusion as an article, I believe from reviewing the guidelines for notability. I just wanted to see if you may have any feedback. Thanks for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Athousanddaysbefore ( talk • contribs) 19:22, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Unfortunately being on the charts does not meet the notability guidelines of Wikipedia since it does not indicate any significance or coverage. However, after re-evaluation of sources, the in-depth coverage in the article of Austin Chronic and other sources demonstrates this. Therefore, I think it would be okay to include this in Wikipedia. I will add a comment to the article about this and please do submit it as soon as possible. Unfortunately I will be unable to review the article because second opinion is needed and they should be reviewed randomly for the sake of fairness. Thanks :-) WikiAviator ( talk) 01:19, 24 August 2020 (UTC) WikiAviator ( talk) 01:19, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello, WikiAviator. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Synergis".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Eternal Shadow Talk 02:54, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello WikiAviator,
you mentioned that on my draft of Erik Stoffelshaus there are reliable sources missing. I´m a little confused about it, because for every aspect of his career I thought I had a reliable source as each of them was eiter a newspaper article or a statement of the organisation he worked for. So, do I just need more sources?
Best regards
VfBenny89 ( talk) 08:06, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
Hi,
You have declined the AfC submission of Draft:Yugo Kochi on the ground “nn -Submission is about a topic not yet shown to meet general notability guidelines”. I think this was a mistake (or at least not specific enough); the article clearly shows the notability. I have therefore moved the draft to mainspace. —- Taku ( talk) 08:16, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Hi,
I am just wondering if you can tell me why the following post was deleted and what I would need to do to get it fit for resumission
Leadership_approval_opinion_polling_for_the_2017_United_Kingdom_general_election
There is similar pages for 2015, 2019 and for the next general election so it would be good if we can include a page for 2017. RoyalBlueStuey ( talk) 14:25, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Hello WikiAviator,
It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.
Rank | Username | Num reviews | Log |
---|---|---|---|
1 | DannyS712 bot III ( talk) | 67,552 | Patrol Page Curation |
2 | Rosguill ( talk) | 63,821 | Patrol Page Curation |
3 | John B123 ( talk) | 21,697 | Patrol Page Curation |
4 | Onel5969 ( talk) | 19,879 | Patrol Page Curation |
5 | JTtheOG ( talk) | 12,901 | Patrol Page Curation |
6 | Mcampany ( talk) | 9,103 | Patrol Page Curation |
7 | DragonflySixtyseven ( talk) | 6,401 | Patrol Page Curation |
8 | Mccapra ( talk) | 4,918 | Patrol Page Curation |
9 | Hughesdarren ( talk) | 4,520 | Patrol Page Curation |
10 | Utopes ( talk) | 3,958 | Patrol Page Curation |
John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.
As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
18:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello and hi. I saw you declined Draft:Achhelal Sonkar. The person is an elected MLA hence passing WP:NPOL by virtue. Please give a clarification regarding your decline. Kichu🐘 Need any help? 10:14, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi,
I see you have declined the draft I created at /info/en/?search=Draft:Chao_Guo
I am new at this so please bear with me. However, I followed the guidelines here: /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Notability_(academics)
Based on these guidelines Chao Guo would seem to clearly qualify, if not for his publication and citation record then at least for meeting the 'editor' criterion which states that "The person has been the head or chief editor of a major, well-established academic journal in their subject area."
Can you please help me understand the decline and what I can do to fix this?
Thanks.
Gdsaxton ( talk) 18:56, 21 April 2021 (UTC).
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
WikiAviator talk 09:25, 22 April 2021 (UTC)I see that you tried to accept Draft:Jordan Nash, and were blocked because there is already a redirect from his name to the film in which he starred. I see that you then accepted the draft by adding a disambiguator. Please do not do that. If there is a redirect, accepting the draft with a disambiguator causes confusion. The process of accepting a draft when there is a redirect because a previous article was cut down is complicated. If you don't know how to do that, or can't do that, please ask for help instead, at Articles for Creation. Robert McClenon ( talk) 04:59, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi. I know you are trying to help but I'm very doubtful about some of the articles you have accepted. I have already had to delete some and move others back to draft space. I am not sure you have enough experience to tell what is acceptable and what isn't. Deb ( talk) 15:50, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello WikiAviator:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long
Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.
Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 3200 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:54, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.
WIKIAVIATOR'S REPLIES WILL BE IN BLOCK, BOLD, ITALICS SINCE THIS WOULD ALLOW ME TO REPLY JUST BELOW THE TEXT YOU HAVE WRITTEN WITHOUT SCROLLING BACK AND FORTH BETWEEN YOUR TEXT AND THE BOTTOM OF THE PAGE. IT WOULD BE MORE CONVENIENT FOR ME TO REPLY JUST BELOW THE TEXT I WANT TO REFER TO. SORRY FOR THE INCONVENIENCE. I DON'T MEAN TO BE RUDE FOR CAPSLOCKING EVERYTHING.
Many thanks for your replies, I appreciate the sense of Block Captials to make your comments stand out
-- Smartiperson ( talk) 16:49, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello. I saw you declined
Draft:Tunnelmental. The reason you gave was "Only 1 RS: the BBC one."
Firstly, it would be helpful to understand how many Reliable Sources would be considered 'enough' for an article to be published. Given that there is indeed at least 1 RS, that implies that at least some of the article can be published. It is challenging to locate RS given the pre-internet age of some of history, but in the meantime, the article could be slimmed down with the removal of unverified text. However, the preference would be to leave much of this content in place, since the detail is factual, just lacking RS. Most articles on Wikipedia have a mixture of cited information and supplemental uncited text, and so there can be some leeway as to including such supplementary words as long it is reasonable and can be presumed accurate, perhaps with added comments saying "citation required"
Since you pointed out the apparent lack of RS, I have endeavoured to supplement, highlight move and remove citations in order to present the information in an enhanced way. As you have already noted, the minor stuff had the effect of masking the key points. In particular, I have removed the irrelevant facebook links which were not helping to verify the article itself. Thank you for your explanation of the difference between 'factual' and verifiable. I believe now that the remaining content is appropriately cited.
-- Smartiperson ( talk) 16:59, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Secondly, your review seems to have overlooked a couple of RS. These are:
1^ Eynon, Michelle. "Tunnelmental Defeat the Inefficiency of Crashing". digital-collections.csun.edu. Daily Sundial. Retrieved 30 November 2020.
This links to a pdf copy of the California State University published newspaper "Daily Sundial" dated Thursday, November 19, 1992. You have to scroll down to Page 9. Here you then find an important article which includes words and a photo relating to the original 3 members of the band, and their music EP release.
Thank you for confirming the validity of this citation. Given all the changes now made, I will resubmit this Draft article so the updated form can be given fresh consideration.
-- Smartiperson ( talk) 16:59, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
Also:
12^ Ali, Lorraine. "In Search of the Hottest Music in Town : L.A.'s storied rock clubs fizzled in the pay-to-play '80s, but today's revitalized scene is thriving on a healthy dose of underground spirit". latimes.com. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 30 November 2020.
The calls up an article published in the Los Angles Times newspaper dated march 13, 1994. Within this, a review of "The Auditorium" mentions the group and provides a quote from one of the original members.
Regarding the accepted RS from the BBC, that there are a total of 4 separate articles published on different dates, so these are multiple citations.
17^ Morris, Stephen. "Stephen Morris reviews Tunnelmental Experimental Assembly". BBC Gloucestershire. Retrieved 29 November 2020. [16th June 2010]
21^ "Cheltenham jockey returns to play at Wychwood Festival". bbc.co.uk. BBC Gloucestershire. Retrieved 30 November 2020. [4th June 2010]
26^ Morris, Stephen. "Stephen Morris on Tunnelmental Experimental Assembly". bbc.co.uk. BBC Gloucestershire. Retrieved 30 November 2020. [18th March 2011]
28^ Morris, Stephen. "Tunnelmental Experimental Assembly review". bbc.co.uk. BBC Gloucestershire. Retrieved 1 December 2020. [14th October 2011]
Additional references to the mentioned appearances at Wychwood Festival (2010) and also Alchemy Festival (2013) are also included, and have been updated since the site has been revised:
19^ "Wychwood Music Festival 2010: TunnelMental Experimental Assembly". efestivals.co.uk. efestivals. Retrieved 30 November 2020.
29^ "Alchemy Festival 2013". efestivals.co.uk. Retrieved 29 November 2020.
Within this site are the Performer's page, which provides a photo of the band.
There are a number of other citations used which have merit.
For instance:
34^ "T.E.A Time as Tunnelmental Experimental Assembly talks to WSR". wickedspinsradio.org. Retrieved 30 November 2020.
This provides an interview with the band, published by Wicked Spin Radio
3^ "Watch this! Tunnelmental new single 'a slice of perfect punktronica'". louderthanwar.com. Louder Than War. Retrieved 2 December 2020.
This provides a review of their music and describes it's genre, published by Louder Than War. [September 7, 2016]
37 ^ "SPILL CANADIAN MUSIC PREMIERE: TUNNELMENTAL – "AWAKE ME"". spillmagazine.com. Spill Magazine. Retrieved 30 November 2020.
This provides another article on the band's music, published by Spill Magazine.
41 ^ Franklin, Dave. "Pop by any other name from tunnelmental experimental assembly". theswindonian.co.uk. Retrieved 29 November 2020.
This provides a review of a music release and the band, published by The Swindonian [18th April 2019]
There are a number of cross-references with existing Wikipedia pages, most notably with
Erika Amato and
Velvet Chain, and cites a bio of a key member of both groups:
7^ "Jeff Stacy bio". velvetchain.com. Retrieved 30 November 2020.
Furthermore, there are many sources included relating to various music sites such as Bandcamp and discogs; these could be supplemented with an update to include other sites such as Apple iTunes, Deezer, Spotify etc. Whereas these might not classify as 'Citation', they do provide access to the relevant music released output of the band.
Finally, there are several references included relating to relevant facebook pages. Whereas these may not qualify as RS, they do at least provide supplementary reference information on the people referred to with the descriptive text, thereby providing a reference background.
In summary, I would ask that you look again at the suitably of article for publishing, and hopefully provide additional guidance as to what does and doesn't classify as RS, also explaining "how much more" is needed to qualify for publishing.
-- Smartiperson ( talk) 10:55, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
EDIT: Since the initial review, a few minor amendments have been made to the AFC: Draft:Tunnelmental
This citation from Michelle Eynon has been moved to the introductory section, since it provides a reference regarding the founding members of the band, the movement to LA and the related music EP. This is a key RS appearing in the California State University published newspaper "Daily Sundial" dated Thursday, November 19, 1992.
1^ Eynon, Michelle. "Tunnelmental Defeat the Inefficiency of Crashing". digital-collections.csun.edu. Daily Sundial. Retrieved 16 May 2021.
The citations relating to appearances at eFestivals have been updated to link back to the line-ups of performers highlighting attendance at these festivals by the band. These have been supplemented with an additional citation which links to the Performer's page. Although no forthcoming appearances are listed, there is at least a photo taken of a previous performance.
19^ "Wychwood Music Festival 2010 line-up and rumours". efestivals.co.uk. efestivals. Retrieved 16 May 2021
25^ "TunnelMental Experimental Assembly (performer's page)". efestivals.co.uk. Retrieved 16 May 2021.
29^ "Alchemy Festival 2013". efestivals.co.uk. Retrieved 16 May 2021.
This additional comment has been added to the Discography Section, highlighting that current music from the band is accessible on iTunes and Spotify and historical physical format music is listed on the ebay auction site. These locations have been identified in additional citations.
Much of Tunnelmental's more recent music can be found on various download and streaming sites such as Apple's iTunes [68] and Spotify [69] whereas earlier material may be located on physical media sold through auction sites such as eBay [70].
73^ "itunes artist tunnelmental". music.apple.com. Retrieved 16 May 2021.
74^ "Tunnelmental Songs, Albums and Playlists Spotify". spotify.com. Retrieved 16 May 2021.
75^ "TUNNELMEN - DEFEAT THE INEFFICIENCY OF CRASHING". ebay.com. Retrieved 16 May 2021.
--
Smartiperson (
talk) 14:02, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Moved this citation to introduction to reference type of music and the relaunch, and shortened the description. Also added additional citation copy to provide reference to Joy Mitchell's contribution.
2^ Carr, Nigel. "Nigel R Mitchell – Tunnelmental – Interview". Louderthanwar.com. Retrieved 19 May 2021.
42^ adminmimicnewscom. "Nigel R Mitchell – Tunnelmental – Interview". mimicnews.com. Retrieved 19 May 2021.
Added improved citation for music single Sting
35^ Franklin, Dave. "Sting – tunnelmental experimental assembly (reviewed by Dave Franklin)". dancing-about-architecture.com. Retrieved 19 May 2021.
Added additional background history citation
5^ "Flipside magazine interview of tunnelmental from 1996". tunnelmental.com. Retrieved 19 May 2021.
Moved Citation from John Robb to the introduction as this provides background for the relaunched band.
3^ Robb, John. "Watch this! Tunnelmental new single 'a slice of perfect punktronica'". louderthanwar.com. Louder Than War. Retrieved 19 May 2021.
Added additional citation for Advertising Junky, due to the original one being moved to the introduction.
36^ "Advertising Junky (It's a Trap)". amazon.com. Retrieved 19 May 2021.
Added Citation to involvement by Geordie Walker
10^ "Music Connection, The West Coast Music Trade Magazine". tunnelmental.com. Retrieved 19 May 2021.
Added citation to review in The Independent newspaper of the Wychwood Festival
20^ Perrone, Pierre. "First Night, Wychwood Festival, CHELTENHAM, The Independent newspaper". tunnelmental.com. Retrieved 19 May 2021.
-- Smartiperson ( talk) 08:23, 19 May 2021 (UTC)