Hello, Varoon2542, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on
talk pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our
help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on
my talk page or place {{Help me}}
on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! ~
TheresNoTime (
to explain!) 23:19, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Varoon2542! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 21 November 2021 (UTC) |
Hello, I'm
Dāsānudāsa. I noticed that you recently removed content from
Bhakti movement without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Dāsānudāsa (
talk) 16:43, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
|
|
Generally, a gallery or cluster of images should not be added so long as there is space for images to be effectively presented adjacent to text. Galleries or clusters of images are generaly discouraged as they cause undue weight to one particular section (?) of a summary article and may cause accessibility problems (?) . Gallery images must collectively add to the reader's understanding of the subject without causing unbalance to an article or section within an article while avoiding similar or repetitive images, unless a point of contrast or comparison is being made. Multiple images can be staggered right and left. However, avoid sandwiching text between two images that face each other; or between an image and infobox, navigation template, or similar.
An image should generally be placed in the
most relevant article section; if this is not possible, try not to place an image "too early" i.e. far ahead of the text discussing what the image illustrates, if this could puzzle the reader. The first image of a section should be placed below the
"Main article" link usually displayed by using {{
Main}}
, {{
Further}}
and {{
See also}}
templates. Do not place an image at the end of the previous section as this will not be visible in the appropriate section on
mobile devices. An image causes a paragraph break (i.e. the current paragraph ends and a new one begins) so it is not possible to place an image within a paragraph. This applies to thumb
images; small inline images are an exception.
Multiple images can be staggered right and left. However, avoid sandwiching text between two images that face each other; or between an image and infobox, navigation template, or similar. As an alternative, consider using the {{ multiple image}} template, which places two images together on the right (but which, however, ignores logged-in users' selected image sizes)
Galleries or clusters of images are generaly discouraged in country articles as they cause undue weight to one particular section (?) of a summary article and may cause accessibility problems (?)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at
Mauritians of Indian origin, without citing a
reliable source. Please review the guidelines at
Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Satrar (
talk) 20:40, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
ZLEA May I have your arbitration? Varoon2542 ( talk) 20:04, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Satrar ( talk) 20:51, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
103.255.6.105 (
talk) 20:03, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
Bagumba May I have your arbitration, please ? He is like stalking me Varoon2542 ( talk) 09:54, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you. ―
Blaze Wolf
TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:09, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -
Satrar (
talk) 19:32, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello. I have noticed that you
often edit without using an
edit summary. For example, a large number of your recent edits undo other users' edits at
Religion in Mauritius with no explanation. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in
your preferences. Thanks!
Snuish (
talk) 21:52, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Please do not add unreferenced or
poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about
living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to
Kajol. Thank you. —
DaxServer (
t ·
m ·
c) 18:21, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from
Francis Xavier into
Goa Inquisition. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
linking to the copied page, e.g.,
copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you.
DanCherek (
talk) 02:07, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Professor Penguino ( talk) 22:30, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Professor Penguino Hello, Can you please tell me to what article you are referring to? Regards Varoon2542 ( talk) 20:53, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Killing of Nahel Merzouk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brest. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:05, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
User:Worldbruce. You added content in an article,
Desi, but you didn't provide a
verifiable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a verifiable citation and re-add it, please do so.
<ref name="statsmauritius.govmu.org"/>
{{cite journal|last1=Government|first1=India|title=Population of Non-resident indians country wise|date=2012}}
You've been around a while, so referencing for beginners may be too basic for you, but you may still find it useful because it links to more advanced referencing topics. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. -- Worldbruce ( talk) 16:06, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Could you please have a look at the page mentioned in the section title (an explanatory essay on en.wp policy), as well as the page concerning restoring challenged edits: WP:ONUS (policy). I see you've been warned about edit warring above. I'd suggest that making use of the talk page leads to better results. As it happens I also live in France and have since well before the 2005 French riots. I'm also quite aware of the RS press coverage of these events. -- SashiRolls 🌿 · 🍥 00:56, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Plz stick to the source. You continue reverting the edit even though the source does not comply with it. All the sources mentioned describe her as melody queen or queen of playback singing which does not equal to most celebrated singer. There is very little consensus regarding that she is most celebrated singer of India when there are singers like Mohd Rafi. This argument is highly debatable. Arorapriyansh333 ( talk) 08:58, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add
unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at
Seewoosagur Ramgoolam. The sources other than Indian express one are not considered reliable. Also, be informed of wiki policies. You can't decide anything, you need to write what source say.
Admantine123 (
talk) 08:13, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
User:Novem Linguae Hello, I'm not asking for help right now but in case the matter were to escalate, I would eventually like your arbitration. I'm acting in good faith. Regards Varoon2542 ( talk) 23:32, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
The Current Events Barnstar | |
In recognition of your contributions to the article Killing of Nahel Merzouk. -- Cdjp1 talk 15:57, 17 July 2023 (UTC) |
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from
Exodus of Kashmiri Hindus into
Kashmir division. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
linking to the copied page, e.g.,
copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. —
Diannaa (
talk) 19:11, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
Stop edit warring on Seewoosagur Ramgoolam or you will be blocked. The other editor has opened a discussion on Talk:Seewoosagur Ramgoolam and pinged you to it. You need to take part there and attempt to get consensus for your version, not just try to push it through by edit warring. Bishonen | tålk 18:53, 19 July 2023 (UTC).
Here are the diffs of your 4 reverts on Killing of Nahel Merzouk in the last 80 minutes. There are intervening edits by others in between each edit. I would like to give you a chance to self-revert before someone takes this to the edit-warring noticeboard. I notice you just deleted the last warning given to you about edit-warring on this page.
Regards, -- SashiRolls 🌿 · 🍥 13:42, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Varoon2542_reported_by_User:SashiRolls_(Result:_). Thank you. --
SashiRolls
🌿 ·
🍥 16:23, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is
Request restoration of some of my editing privileges. Thank you. You have come up in the context of you interactions with SashiRolls.
Nil Einne (
talk) 07:13, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
Sorry about the revert there. I misread your summary. Tim O'Doherty ( talk) 14:48, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Fowler&fowler. I wanted to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions to
Kashmir division have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use
your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Teahouse or the
Help desk. Please note that the lead sentence and infobox maps are an aspect of the WikiProjects India-Pakistan-China consensus of August 2019. We cannot tamper with them unless we have created a new consensus. Also, we can't do a data dump of the Exodus of Kashmiri Hindus into this article. By a long-maintained consensus only highly distilled summaries of a few sentences can go into
Jammu and Kashmir (state) if there is consensus for them, not into this article, Best regards,
Fowler&fowler
«Talk» 20:40, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Re your edit here: I'm gay and I've been active and vocal in supporting gay rights for 45 years, which shows just how reckless this stunt is of attributing everything you don't like to homophobia and other forms of hate despite your having been given the true and perfectly good reason for it. I removed the link for the exact purpose that I stated in my edit summary. Largoplazo ( talk) 11:25, 29 April 2024 (UTC)