Hello, Trainrobber66, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Trainrobber66, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.
Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.
New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{ help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! GPL93 ( talk) 01:51, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at User:Trainrobber66. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GPL93 ( talk) 01:51, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at User:Trainrobber66. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GPL93 ( talk) 11:33, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to River Avon, Bristol have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 13:33, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Shadbase requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Luciapop ( talk) 16:18, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Trainrobber66,
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Joseywales1961, and I thank you for your contributions.
I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged Dismantled railway for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative. Also, you may want to consider working on future articles in draft space first, where they cannot be deleted for lacking content.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.
For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
JW 1961 Talk 20:34, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Shadbase, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ...
discospinster
talk 20:45, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Trainrobber66,
Thank you for creating Rag Mill.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Meatsgains}}
. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Meatsgains( talk) 16:17, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Rag Mill, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from
reliable,
independent sources to verify its contents and to establish the notability of the subject. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
DoubleGrazing (
talk) 18:09, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you make
personal attacks on others again, as you did at
User_talk:Redrose64, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.
Black Kite (talk) 15:23, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Mexican meat. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CommanderWaterford ( talk) 10:51, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on BTS Stan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Suryabeej ⋠talk⋡ 17:51, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Trainrobber66. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Shadbase, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for
article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 21:02, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Trainrobber66. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Rag Mill, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for
article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 19:01, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Trainrobber66. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Shadbase".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:19, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Trainrobber66. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Rag Mill".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 ( talk) 19:46, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello Trainrobber66,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Muck (video game) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Simon Peter Hughes ( talk) 13:19, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
Trainrobber66 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
unblock me i'm sorry you hamlet
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla ( talk) 18:05, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Trainrobber66 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I was try to make a wiki on a video game Trainrobber66 ( talk) 12:27, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You were attempting to create a Wikipedia article, not a "wiki" which is an entire website. It was completely unsourced, and when this was pointed out you made a personal attack. It seems that you lack the skills and maturity needed to participate here at this time. I am declining your request. 331dot ( talk) 15:36, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You may not remove prior declined requests while blocked. 331dot ( talk) 15:33, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Trainrobber66 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Well duh, I was trying to make an article when I looked it up and found no results I legitimately clicked on start a new article silly!
Decline reason:
I agree with the withdrawal of your ability to edit this page. MER-C 18:55, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
... is declined. Confirmed sockpuppetry. --
Yamla (
talk) 18:44, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for using the Unblock Ticket Request System. I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you. Please describe concisely and clearly how your edits merited a block, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you would make. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. ( /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks). The UTRS software may lock you out for a day or two. Please use this time to review your talk page and the reasons for your block, and to consider how you will address these reasons. Best, -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 21:06, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
TPA restored. CheckUser data says it's Unlikely for this user to have recently evaded their block.
Trainrobber661 (
talk ·
contribs) is them, but no
WP:BADSOCK violation.
DatGuy
Talk
Contribs 18:23, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
Trainrobber66 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I would like to apologize to Simon Peter Hughes for my violent and discriminant language I used against him. These was completely awful words I used directly at him. I would also like to apologize for making multiple sockpuppet accounts to exploit Wikipedia. However, I would like to benefit from editing on Wikipedia by creating useful Infoboxes, Sidebars and Articles on Wikipedia. Thanks, Trainrobber66. Trainrobber66 ( talk) 09:42, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I'm going to suggest that you demonstrate an edit that you want to make on this page, please use the following process to do so. This will help us determine if unblocking you would benefit the encyclopedia.
This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate and confirm that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:
Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:
{{infobox name|...}}
),[[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]
),[[Category:Name]]
),{{Foo stub}}
);== [[Article title]] ==
) the copied content but do not save yet;Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution.
"{{reflist-talk}}
. Once you have added the template, click .If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{
Help me|your question here ~~~~}}
" to your talk page. Thank you.
331dot (
talk) 09:24, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
}}
I am quite patient Trainrobber66 ( talk) 10:28, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
It's been a while. I hope you all have a merry christmas and a Happy new year. Trainrobber66 ( talk) 09:17, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
DatGuy & 331dot if you could please review my request Trainrobber66 ( talk) 18:53, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
what do I edit 331dot ? Trainrobber66 ( talk) 10:46, 5 January 2024 (UTC)}}
331dot. Did I do well? Trainrobber66 ( talk) 16:52, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
331dot I still don't know who to request Trainrobber66 ( talk) 10:19, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
Trainrobber66 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
DatGuy Yamla Bbb23 MER-C May I request that I be unblocked to create infoboxes, sidebars and a few small articles.
Decline reason:
The most optimistic position I can give is that you didn't follow 331dot's suggestion above, possibly because you
didn't understand the instructions or lacked the ability to follow them. However, frankly, I'm not sure that's an accurate position for me to take. I think you are just deliberately wasting our time. Additionally, Confirmed sockpuppetry as
Dogman645.
Yamla (
talk) 11:01, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Additionally, I have re-revoked your talk page access to prevent you wasting any more of our time. -- Yamla ( talk) 11:03, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
It was first constructed in granted by the king to the monks of Bath Abbey in 931, However, the structure itself is dated to about the 18th century. Currently, the mill is used as a venue for weddings and other gatherings. [1]
Trainrobber66 ( talk) 15:56, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Grenfell Tower, the fire, and its aftermath |
---|
![]() |
Trainrobber66 ( talk) 19:10, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
|sidebar=yes
after including the template. Reduced the orange to a small lighter orange header if that's okay.
Dank
Jae 21:00, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
I'm inclined to unblock you, but when two admins whose judgement I trust over my own disagree, I need to look closer. I'd like to ask some questions to examine your readiness. Your comportment will be a consideration as well as your answers. If you feel angry or stressed, please feel free to step away and calm yourself before replying. If my word choices are hard to understand, please feel free to seek clarification. Take your time. There is no need to rush or hurry. Thanks.
First question.
With this edit, you said this account was created in 2018.
Special:CentralAuth/Trainrobber66 says it was created in 2020. Why is this?
-- Deepfriedokra (
talk) 19:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Second question. What prompted this? What would you do differently today? -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 20:49, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Third question. I see a number of deleted articles. What would you do today that you did not do then in article creation?
Fourth question. Editing Wikipedia can be very stressful. Without going into details, have you a stress management program? -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 15:02, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Question 5. Back to question 2 in follow up. What resources are available to you for resolving disputes? Thanks, -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 15:55, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
![]()
Hanover House, a residential tower block in
Sheffield, with its cladding partially removed after failing fire safety tests following the Grenfell fire | |
Date | June 14, 2017 | – present
---|---|
Also known as | Cladding Scandal |
Type | Crisis |
Cause | Grenfell tower fire |
Outcome | Renovating cladding |
Trainrobber66 ( talk) 20:10, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
@ Yamla and Bbb23: I think the user has addressed the concerns that led to blocking. It's been a couple of years, so perhaps they have grown. I'm out of questions and might be away from keyboard, so over to y'all. Thanks -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 15:59, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Please indicate if you accept these conditions. Thanks -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 19:54, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a
spam link. Persistent spammers may have their websites
blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all
Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines.
OhNoitsJamie
Talk 16:36, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to Channel to Channel Path. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris talk! 16:52, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
@ Deepfriedokra: also see their creations of Britannia Bridge disaster (which I redirected as an unattributed copy) and then Britannia Bridge fire (which I also redirected as it had the exact same issue). Fram ( talk) 18:29, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Please do not introduce
links in actual articles to
draft articles, as you did to
Britannia Bridge. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the
Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. -
Arjayay (
talk) 17:28, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Trainrobber66!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
KylieTastic (
talk) 18:53, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
|
Wut? Other admins? -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 19:05, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Please start the discussion for your split proposal at Talk:SSSniperWolf, per the instructions at WP:PROSPLIT. Thanks. Schazjmd (talk) 21:51, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
How do I extend/add more sources or content this draft? ''''trainrobber'''' ( talk) 18:25, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
When you created {{ UK Television}}, you added a link to a disambiguation page, a "behind the scenes" page where there's multiple articles with similar titles; in this case, ITV. This is a common mistake, so don't beat yourself up about it. However, it should go without saying that it's really important that navigation templates have the correct link. One way to make this easier is to go to Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets, ctrl/cmd + F "Display links to disambiguation pages in orange," and check off the preference to have disambigation links display in a different color. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 21:46, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Stonetoss requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stonetoss (2nd nomination). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CycloneYoris talk! 20:57, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
that on reviewing your talk page, you still lack the competence to edit constructively, and that your edits are still disruptive. I will need to reblock you for this reason, though I am sorry to need to do so. -- Deepfriedokra ( talk).
I still don't what articles I disrupt, can you provide me a list of articles that did? trainrobber 07:18, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
-- Deepfriedokra (
talk) 04:35, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Trainrobber66 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
im sorry for lacking competence on my wikipedia account. and for disrupting others. i personally think that i was too excited after 2 years of blocking. to see me blocked is just a shame.
Accept reason:
Per conversation below, this user's indef block is reduced to a partial block and the user is now subject to the following conditions:
As a conditional unblock, these restrictions are binding upon Trainrobber66 until they are appealed or time out. These conditions may be appealed to the administrator's noticeboard six months from the timestamp in the unblocking administrator's signature below.
— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 04:21, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
trainrobber 07:03, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- You will be prohibited from editing the article namespace. This means that your indefinite block will convert to a partial block and you will be unable to edit articles. You will be permitted to create drafts and you will be required to use the articles for creation process. This means that you can create drafts and submit them for evaluation, but you will not be able to edit the mainspace directly.
- You will be prohibited from pinging an editor more than once every twenty-four hours regarding the same subject, broadly construed. This means that you should not post messages tagging people by their username more than once per twenty-four hours about the same sort of thing (as you did in the three messages preceding this). This limit applies even if you are directly replying to the user.
- You will be subject to an indefinite one revert restriction; you may not make more than one revert on one page every twenty-four hours, on pain of being blocked.
- You will be subject to civility probation for six months. This means that if you engage in name calling, are overtly rude, or are otherwise uncivil, any administrator may block you without further warning. Any blocks made pursuant to this probation will reset the six-month timer, which will restart at the time when such a block expires.
What's the time zone in your country? Mines GMT. This is why I'm late to respond. I also go to bed at 9:00pm. trainrobber 07:22, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I removed the CSD nomination at Draft:Channel to Channel Path because it was somewhat unclear which criteria you were trying to get it deleted under. What makes the most sense to me is that you were going for a WP:G7 - if that's the case, I can delete it for you. I just wanted to double check that that is what you actually wanted. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 19:30, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Template:Picasso has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page.
Frietjes (
talk) 19:32, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Template:Anonymous group has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 21:11, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Template:UK Television has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 18:51, 5 June 2024 (UTC)