This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello, Severestorm28, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on
talk pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our
help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on
my talk page or place {{Help me}}
on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! ~
Destroyer
🌀
🌀 16:51, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
How do I sign my posts?
Hi Severestorm28! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
What does it matter if I get banned from Wikipedia? You wrote on my talk page that if I get banned I won't be able to make meaningful edits. What does it matter since I can't make meaningful edits across the board? For example I can't correct the Project Veritas / James O'Keefe article (can't remember which one) where you say he puts out misinformation and falsely call him a conspiracy theorist. Alex Jones is a conspiracy theorist. James O'Keefe is an investigative journalist. If I removed such nonsense I would likely have my edits reverted immediately.
My "vandalism" shows the closed nature of Wikipedia as I've known for more than a decade. How open is this platform when any edit is immediately reverted within seconds because the thought police are notified of it? It's not really an open platform if there's literally changes reverted in seconds, and that is what I was experimenting with. Will those small changes be reverted and how fast. It probably doesn't happen on all articles. Like I had an article about myself and somebody comes in and edits it and says I'm a mass murderer.. There won't be any reversion of it in seconds. but if it has to do with leftist issues then of course yes.
So if I provide a medical textbook that shows the reality that gender assignment is nonsense and wrong. You'll allow the complete rewrite of the article? Because that's what would be required. There's nothing wrong with transgenderism. This is not transphobic. I do not doubt that with all the things that are screwed up in the environment that people can be born as the wrong sex. I totally believe that. But doctors do not assign gender at birth. A person is either male or female by their DNA and by whether they have a penis or a vagina. This is scientific medical fact. Whether someone feels different is irrelevant. Someone feeling different is the very basis for transgenderism.
The problem is when the Internet came about everyone was given the power to publish their own ideas without credibility and scrutiny and the caveat of that is that lunatics can come up with the idea of gender assignment at birth and then convince enough people that it becomes a movement to make it mainstream, defying all science and reality. but nonetheless none of this will ever make it to wikipedia because it's a leftist platform. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.198.55.252 ( talk • contribs) 21:52, October 29, 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Indiana State Road 39, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Belleville. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Philroc. I noticed that you made a change to an article, 1971 Pacific typhoon season, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Philroc ( talk) 00:18, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
Please accept this invitation to join the Tropical cyclones WikiProject (WPTC), a WikiProject dedicated to improving all articles associated with tropical cyclones. WPTC hosts some of Wikipedia's highest-viewed articles, and needs your help for the upcoming cyclone season. Simply click here to accept! |
Destroyeraa ( Alternate account) 02:00, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Severestorm28!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
GoingBatty (
talk) 06:21, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
|
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Greenman ( talk) 21:46, 16 November 2021 (UTC)Hello, Severestorm28!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Iffy★
Chat -- 10:30, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
|
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I'll just answer you here to stop pinging the other user who may not necessarily be interested in this conversation. I again agree with the decline on the Ezekiel Clark draft as I don't see him as notable quite yet. You can read WP:GNG if you'd like as that sort of sets a baseline for what notability means on Wikipedia. I don't think there are enough independent sources out there that would indicate notability. There are some like you pointed out, but I personally don't think there is enough. Then we can look at WP:NTENNIS guidelines, and he doesn't meet any of those either. So as of now, I don't think he is notable. He may be in the future, but we need more sources for that to happen. Adamtt9 ( talk) 21:53, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Severestorm28!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Devonian Wombat (
talk) 06:09, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
|
Hi Severestorm28! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse, Click this link to read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, .
|
Thank you for replying to me and for your advice. I think I'm sorted. BuffyO'B ( talk) 23:09, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
How do I archive a discussion with bots?
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Severestorm28 ( talk) 14:16, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
{{User:MiszaBot/config | algo=old(90d) | archive=User talk:Severestorm28/Archive %(counter)d | counter=1 | maxarchivesize=75K | archiveheader={{Automatic archive navigator}} | minthreadsleft=4 | minthreadstoarchive=1 }}
algo=old(90d)
), if there are more than 4 threads on the page (minthreadsleft=4
). You can change any or all of the above variables to different effect, but generally you only need to worry about the age and the number of threads to keep track of. If you want more help, change the {{
help me-helped}} back into a {{
help me}}, stop by the
Teahouse, or Wikipedia's
live help channel, or the
help desk to ask someone for assistance.
Primefac (
talk) 14:15, 26 November 2021 (UTC)This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
If you are a teahouse host, can you still ask a question? Also, what if you have a problem you can't take care of?
Severestorm28 ( talk) 16:19, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diligence | ||
Recognising a high level of precision, accuracy and scrutiny in their contributions, in particular, to meteorology-related articles. SpookiePuppy ( talk) 19:50, 28 November 2021 (UTC) |
@ SpookiePuppy: Thanks so much! :) Thanks for the barnstar, and my first branstar ever! Severestorm28 ( talk) 20:21, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi, I am Robert Schnakenberg. You keep reverting the edits I make to the Robert Schnakenberg page. This page is rife with false information put there by someone as a joke. In fact, the entire page should be deleted. I did not create it, do not authorize it, and I am not a public figure. Please allow me to remove this FALSE and in some cases DEFAMATORY information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:7000:7F00:D306:B81B:7286:113:4815 ( talk) 16:12, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
If I am wrong, please put text below.
Why would you give User:Harryisabeast253 a level 4 warning when they haven't edited since being warned yesterday?-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 21:34, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
-- 01:21, Tuesday, November 30, 2021 ( UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
-- 01:27, Tuesday, November 30, 2021 ( UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
I'm sorry for your loss. I hope this kitten could bring you some comfort.
Destroyeraa (
Alternate account) 23:29, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Please see WP:VALIDALT, and act accordingly in relation to User talk:Severestorm00. Thank you. Drmies ( talk) 17:25, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Aye 2600:6C40:5E00:35DF:A8C0:1CFE:9ED4:F716 ( talk) 04:35, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Christina Ricci has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Sundayclose ( talk) 18:00, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
First of all, I didn't "stack up warnings". I sent you one warning above. Regarding your edit, you changed "She is known" to "She is best known". Your edit summary was "Grammar edit". Your edit had nothing to do with grammar. The edit changed the meaning of the sentence. That's a deceptive edit summary. My warning above still stands. Sundayclose ( talk) 19:13, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Severestorm28!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Rusalkii (
talk) 04:32, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
|
@ Rusalkii: Thanks for the comment, I never knew if Wiki Fandom was a reliable source. Severestorm28 talk 13:13, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
Table wasnt even a "resource" it was a TABLE of complile showing all diff modern racial composition, just because it uses research dosnt mean it is fully.. then half of wiki is just research ,stupid reason to remove that sourced racial table. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bikkustra1 ( talk • contribs) 13:21, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
There are several books on Google Books that mention "Blooket". For example, "Deepening In-Class and Online Learning" by Swartz, L., A Nyman, D. and A Livingston, M.: "Blooket is a quiz tool that enables students to review content in a multiple-choice format. (Students can be put into randomized groups to encourage camaraderie and collaboration). Blooket will show students the correct answer if they get it wrong.)" [1] That source also states: "There are many apps that can be used innovatively for book trailers and much more. Animoto, Answer Garden, Blooket, Google Keep, Padlet, Prezi, Storybird, Storyboard That, Toontastic, and Whell of Names are just some of the apps available." There is also [2] and [3] If you use these references, be very careful about copyright. Also, I don't think Wikipedia favours the use of Google Books, but it's perfectly possible to create a reference using one of the templates (such as cite book) [1] then just provide a live URL to Google Books. Hope this helps, if you decide to resubmit your draft article. SpookiePuppy ( talk) 15:48, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
References
Blooket is a new live review game for the classroom.
Hi — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1702:1BD0:3B30:DD00:D755:5A7F:5106 ( talk) 18:02, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Is Huggle avaliable on iPad and iPhone? Or just Computer?
Severe storm 28 20:37, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
-- Guerillero Parlez Moi 23:29, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi Severestorm28. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when using rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! -- Guerillero Parlez Moi 23:31, 18 December 2021 (UTC) Guerillero
Elijahandskip (
talk) is wishing you a
Merry
Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes
WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{ subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
@ Elijahandskip: Thank you! Severe storm 28 14:30, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi Severestorm28, Thank you very much! Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, ~ ToBeFree ( talk) 15:15, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
How do I do a diff (meaning a user's edits)? Severe storm 28 15:45, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi Severestorm28! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
|
Your comments at SPI are unhelpful. The above case is just an example - there are others. You do not request a CU when an IP is the only sock. But that's not the only thing you do wrong. Most of the time your comments restate what others have already said or they say things that are obvious to anyone looking at the report. So, I think you should avoid commenting at SPI completely.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 22:30, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Can administrators block users with Twinkle?
Severe storm 28 01:23, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello Severestorm28! WikiProject Weather is doing a drive during 2022 to get all new 2022 weather articles to at least C class, with the hope of B Class. I thought you might be interested in the WP Weather drive, so I wanted to drop a message about it. Elijahandskip ( talk) 14:05, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for volunteering as a Host at the Teahouse. Wikipedia is a community of people working together to make knowledge free. You are an important part of that effort! By joining as a Host, and by following our expectations, you are helping new users to get started here at Wikipedia, and aiding more experienced users who just have a question about how something works. We appreciate your willingness to help!
Here are some links you may find helpful as a Host:
Are you recent changes patroller? Ctrlwiki • 00:10, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I've semi-protected this page for one day because of the persistent vandalism.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 19:36, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello you keep deleting my edits to Swanage
Swanage does have a drinking bench, as seen in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mSF91Ot20n0
Can you please try and communicate with me instead of reverting my edits and making threats? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.99.171.181 ( talk) 22:40, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
The Absorbing Man's power is absorbing the properties of anything he touches. Everyone who reads Marvel knows this. 2600:1700:7E31:5710:7C9E:D399:A8CB:7D6F ( talk) 04:09, 12 January 2022 (UTC)