♠ New messages to the bottom please. I will reply here without pinging unless asked otherwise. |
|
|
![]() |
Hey, Premeditated Chaos. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the
Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Chris Troutman ( talk) 16:19, 23 November 2022 (UTC) |
![]() |
![]() | Happy First Edit Day! Hi Premeditated Chaos! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:03, 23 November 2022 (UTC) |
![]() |
I want to recreate the page asd ( talk) 18:48, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
Hey PMC, good job with the orphaned articles! I'm back from my break so looking forward to getting the rest networked up
SITH
(talk) 21:05, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Illusion of Kate Moss you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
LunaEatsTuna --
LunaEatsTuna (
talk) 04:03, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
The article
Illusion of Kate Moss you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Illusion of Kate Moss for comments about the article, and
Talk:Illusion of Kate Moss/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
LunaEatsTuna --
LunaEatsTuna (
talk) 06:44, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
Hello Premeditated Chaos: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, MrLinkinPark333 ( talk) 03:17, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
MrLinkinPark333 ( talk) 03:17, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Please note that a one-off element of a runway show that is not an actual object available anywhere else should not be considered a well-known design of a fashion designer. The image projection also something created by other people, even if it is his idea. There are numerous such elements in his shows, some of them better-known (for example, the robot spray painting, the glass box), don't clatter the lead with them. There are many other things that he actually designed and better known that could be put in the lead ahead of the illusion, like the bumster. Hzh ( talk) 13:30, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
On 28 December 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Widows of Culloden, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the runway show for the Alexander McQueen collection The Widows of Culloden ended with an illusion of Kate Moss that brought the audience to a rowdy standing ovation? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Widows of Culloden. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, The Widows of Culloden), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
-- RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
On 28 December 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Illusion of Kate Moss, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the runway show for the Alexander McQueen collection The Widows of Culloden ended with an illusion of Kate Moss that brought the audience to a rowdy standing ovation? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Widows of Culloden. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Illusion of Kate Moss), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
-- RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Hook update | |
Your hook reached 17,073 views (711.4 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of December 2022 – nice work! |
GalliumBot ( talk • contribs) (he/ it) 03:30, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
The Widows of Culloden you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Trainsandotherthings --
Trainsandotherthings (
talk) 14:21, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
The article
The Widows of Culloden you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:The Widows of Culloden for comments about the article, and
Talk:The Widows of Culloden/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Trainsandotherthings --
Trainsandotherthings (
talk) 15:21, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
Hi. You added a link to the census, but it will not open for me. Could you please double check the link? It could be my computer, but I'd like to make sure. Thanks in advance. Onel5969 TT me 10:32, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi Premeditated Chaos,
I would like to kindly request a second look at the deleted entry for "Aleks Oniszczak" https://wikiarchive.miraheze.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Aleks_Oniszczak. To cut to the chase, I think the entry merits a reinstatement due to at least one important work: being one of the inventors of the technology behind the current Apple "Magic Trackpad" with multitouch surface as found on all current Apple MacBook computers. The invention is well documented in the CHI 1997 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-tactile-touchpad-MacKenzie-Oniszczak/d0b97061ce4c3615214d713d6af09be681c77269. The followup paper "A comparison of three selection techniques for touchpads" in the 1998 Engineering Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems has been cited 116 times. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/A-comparison-of-three-selection-techniques-for-MacKenzie-Oniszczak/f940911596d8f98fe7cea9f97a9fe260889a8d76
Thank you for your consideration of this matter. 99.224.63.243 ( talk) 05:56, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that in your GA review of Muhajir (Pakistan) you stated 'The culture section is underbaked and somewhat unencyclopedic' can you please provide me with some more details of the grievances in that section. Please leave a post on my talk as I am prone to forgetfulness and might not recheck this page.
Muhajir ( talk) 18:52, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi, this article was previously deleted for lack of credibility. However, I truly believe and can validate that this article does satisfy the criteria. The director has made a film with top actors/actresses from tollywood. The lead actress is a national award winner. I would like the opportunity to put this update for debate so I can prove credibility. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pilot03 ( talk • contribs)
Notability Criteria -
References
Pilot03 ( talk) 21:08, 21 January 2023 (UTC)Pilot03
This entry does have creditable verified sources. 66.74.128.152 ( talk) 13:05, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi, hope you are doing well. This article was deleted some months ago: Karl Lagasse. As I did not have time or the opportunity to send my arguments on the discussion page of the article. I have been working on the text of the article again, trying to prove the notability of the artist. Is there a possibility to recreate the article again in this draft space, asking other editors to help work on it, and move it into " article space" when it is ready? or, what are the options just to create the English version of the already french article? I want to mention that the artist Karl Lagasse has an original version of the Wikipedia article in French, since most of his 25 years as an artists were in France, I wanted to create the English version with updated information about his career, as he has lived in the USA since 2018 and has recently been nationalized as an US citizen.
Looking forward for your help and response, 3d.nftart ( talk) 20:52, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi, hope you are doing well. This article was deleted some months ago: Karl Lagasse. As I did not have time or the opportunity to send my arguments on the discussion page of the article. I have been working on the text of the article again, trying to prove the notability of the artist. Here are some sources to indicate the notability of the artists- He is mentioned in several independent art and news magazines (some of them are in French): [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
Lagasse is represented by more than 80 galleries worldwide. Here are some of them:
Is there a possibility to recreate the article again in this draft space, asking other editors to help work on it, and move it into " article space" when it is ready? or, what are the options just to create the English version of the already french article? I want to mention that the artist Karl Lagasse has an original version of the Wikipedia article in French, since most of his 25 years as an artists were in France, I wanted to create the English version with updated information about his career, as he has lived in the USA since 2018 and has recently been nationalized as an US citizen. Looking forward for your help and response 3d.nftart ( talk) 17:20, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Nice article! I really enjoyed it. BorgQueen ( talk) 20:54, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for reviewing Muhajir (Pakistan)
Muhajir (
talk) 18:11, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi Premeditated Chaos and thanks for helping out in checking and giving Four Awards! Per Wikipedia:Four Award/Instructions, make sure you increment the author tally on the main page if it's a first-time winner, as I believe it was in Astrophobe's case. — Bilorv ( talk) 21:06, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
I'd like to move user:SandyGeorgia/sandbox9 to GA space today (Tuesday); might you have a look at it before I do that? If you have any suggestions, it would help to have them with the rest at User talk:SandyGeorgia#PLEASE review my sandbox. Best, SandyGeorgia ( Talk) 06:27, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
On 2 February 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Dance of the Twisted Bull, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a model walked the runway at the Alexander McQueen show The Dance of the Twisted Bull in a flamenco dress pierced with spears? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Dance of the Twisted Bull. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, The Dance of the Twisted Bull), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
BorgQueen ( talk) 00:03, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 7 March 2023. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/March 2023, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/March 2023. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work!— Wehwalt ( talk) 18:22, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Widows of Culloden, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrew Bolton.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:08, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello again! I hope you are doing well. I just wanted to say you are doing really awesome work with all of the Alexander McQueen collection, and I wish you the best of luck with the FAC for The Widows of Culloden. Unfortunately, I doubt I will be able to do a review for the FAC, but I still wanted to say congrats on all that work. I keep meaning to work on fashion articles. I just need to figure out how to better balance Wikipedia with off-Wiki projects before jumping into a completely new area. Anyway, sorry for this super random message. I hope you have a great weekend! Aoba47 ( talk) 01:29, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Daniel Ménard you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
ScottishFinnishRadish --
ScottishFinnishRadish (
talk) 15:02, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
The article
Daniel Ménard you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Daniel Ménard for comments about the article, and
Talk:Daniel Ménard/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
ScottishFinnishRadish --
ScottishFinnishRadish (
talk) 12:02, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
The Dance of the Twisted Bull you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Sammi Brie --
Sammi Brie (
talk) 01:21, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
The article
The Dance of the Twisted Bull you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:The Dance of the Twisted Bull and
Talk:The Dance of the Twisted Bull/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Sammi Brie --
Sammi Brie (
talk) 01:41, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
The article
The Dance of the Twisted Bull you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:The Dance of the Twisted Bull for comments about the article, and
Talk:The Dance of the Twisted Bull/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Sammi Brie --
Sammi Brie (
talk) 06:01, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for considering and discussing the ATD of merging. I think the way the participants addressed it and you closed it is precisely the way it's supposed to work when there's nothing worth merging. Jclemens ( talk) 01:03, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
The Teamwork Barnstar | |
For your participation and help at Wikipedia:Good Article proposal drive 2023. It wouldn't have been such a success without you. 🏵️ Etrius ( Us) 20:42, 21 February 2023 (UTC) |
Per this, I'm not sure how that happened. Some newfangled edit conflict screen appeared. And – while I appreciate the hard work that went into improving the edit conflict system! – it looks like I botched it and somehow deleted part of your comment. My mistake! I was about to fix it manually but you beat me to it. Ajpolino ( talk) 01:56, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi there.
Last year, when you reviewed my GA nomination for a song by the Kinks, you mentioned offhandedly an interest in band drama. I thought you may be interested in an article I just created which is full of exactly that: The Kinks' 1965 US tour. It was quite a disaster. I think I may work this article up to featured status eventually, so I'd appreciate it if you had any prose improvements, as I remember your suggestions being quite good the last time around ... that said, I promise I only brought this to you because I figured you'd be interested in it! Not because I'm trying to solicit any help. Anyway, I hope all is well with you. Cheers. Tkbrett (✉) 12:53, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
Never mix a metaphor you can puree. (Thanks again.)
Olivetheother (
talk) 21:05, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Four Award | |
Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work from beginning to end on The Widows of Culloden. — Bilorv ( talk) 10:35, 5 March 2023 (UTC) |
Congratulations! Sorry that I didn't make it to the FAC in time. - Thank you today also for Armadillo shoe, introduced: "British designer Alexander McQueen was a wild child of fashion, a theatrical mastermind known for runway shows that doubled as performance art. Never was that more true than at his final show, Plato's Atlantis (2009), which featured a number of models walking in foot-tall armadillo shoes that made them look like alien ballerinas. The shoes were both lauded and loathed by the press and the public: many reviews called them grotesque and beautiful in the same sentence. Lady Gaga became famously associated with them after wearing them in a music video and on the red carpet. They remain a subject of fascination for academics and fashion journalists – and me – to this day." -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 07:54, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi! We talked 3 months ago about your delete closure of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1911-12 FC Barcelona season, and I said I'd find sources on the article. I was wondering what would be the best way to show you sources. There are plenty of newspaper reports in digital libraries, such as this one reporting on a 1911 match between Barça and Real Sociedad, as well as in the BNE, such as this one describing in detail their 1912 Copa del Rey Final win (teams participating in the Copa del Rey saw wide coverage in Spain as can be seen in my work for 1919 Copa del Rey Final). I could find another if necessary and link it as part of a reply, but trust this should be enough to convince you of the season's notability. If you deem this sufficient to prove notability, how should we proceed? — Ixtal ( T / C ) ⁂ Non nobis solum. 10:50, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello PMC! So recently, a user I"m mentoring said that they wanted to nominate me for adminship however they were told that I needed to mature a bit more first (or at least, that was what they told me, but that's not a big concern for me for the time being). While I'm not planning on trying to run for adminship anytime soon, it did get me thinking about what I could do now to improve my chances of becoming an admin when I do eventually run. I've already asked ScottishFinnishRadish mostly about what their experience of getting nominated for adminship was considering their account age was similar to mine (i know account age isn't everything, however I figured it would be good to hear from someone who has been on Wikipedia under their current username for about as long as i have), however I want to hear what your experience was and what you think I should do now to improve my chances. I figured I'd ask you since you've been a great help to me with various things, which I greatly appreciate. ― Blaze Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 15:05, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
I noticed you have looked into subject of Sheldan Nidle once before: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheldan Nidle. I am worried about its suitability on the Dutch wiki where a user is adding all kinds of fantasy stories (and on the English wiki as well). Is it still unsuitable on the English wiki? VanBuren ( talk) 20:27, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Hey there!Im very sorry i was unaware that including the information from the "dost mohammad khan" page into the sandbox violated copyright.I created this sandbox as a way to improve the revisions done by Noorullah.Although his contributions did violate copyright,i felt like because of the amount of dedication he did to that page that his contributions should be improved and worked on in the sandbox.We will however rewrite the article in order to avoid any copyright or plagriasm issues.Thanks Twarikh e Khalsa ( talk) 23:13, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Greetings PMC! Can you please protect Georgian calligraphy and Category:Georgian scripts as it’s being disrupted by an unknown IPs for some time now with adding irrelevant categories not related to these articles. Regards, An emperor ✖ 16:48, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Four Award | |
Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work from beginning to end on Illusion of Kate Moss. — Bilorv ( talk) 18:02, 1 April 2023 (UTC) |
Congrats on the four award PMC. I showed the article to my wife when I was reviewing it and she has been talking about it for weeks. Tkbrett (✉) 18:05, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 3 May 2023. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/May 3, 2023, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/May 2023. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild ( talk) 11:38, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
![]() | |
my story today |
---|
Thank you today for the article, introduced: "I'm back with another round of work by British designer Alexander McQueen. This time it's his second Scottish-themed collection, The Widows of Culloden (Autumn/Winter 2006), a mature and measured counterpart to the angry Highland Rape collection of 1995. Widows is well-known as some of McQueen's best work for its emotional narrative, balance of artistic and commercial concerns, and the glorious illusion of Kate Moss that closed the show. Although it has been neearly twenty years since its debut, it remains a popular subject of scholarly analysis from all kinds of critical lenses."! -- (and then I forgot to sign)
more pleasant music (heard today!) if you click on songs - did you know a string quartet with two cellos (and no article yet in English? -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 20:53, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Dear Premediated Chaos.
My article on a new podcast called Stories in the Room: Michael Jackson's Thriller Album Podcast - interviewing the musicians who played on the album has been deleted, before I had a chance to keep a copy of the article let for my personal archive. Would you kindly help me get a copy of that last version before deletion? Thank you. Nightboat ( talk) 18:27, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Hi, you've removed my GA nominations for Fakhruddin Ali Ahmed, Zakir Husain (politician), Shankar Dayal Sharma and Zail Singh noting that "removing nomination by nominator inactive for nearly months". What exactly is the rule allowing such a removal of nomination? Ashwin147
On 27 April 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Birds (Alexander McQueen collection), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that British designer Alexander McQueen constructed a dress made of clear pallet wrap for his Spring/Summer 1995 collection The Birds? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Birds (Alexander McQueen collection). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, The Birds (Alexander McQueen collection)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Aoidh ( talk) 00:04, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Neptune (Alexander McQueen collection) you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Trainsandotherthings --
Trainsandotherthings (
talk) 02:22, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
The article
Neptune (Alexander McQueen collection) you nominated as a
good article has passed ; see
Talk:Neptune (Alexander McQueen collection) for comments about the article, and
Talk:Neptune (Alexander McQueen collection)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Trainsandotherthings --
Trainsandotherthings (
talk) 15:41, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The House on Haunted Hill, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The House on Haunted Hill until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:01, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
On 30 April 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Neptune (Alexander McQueen collection), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Alexander McQueen collection Neptune drew negative reviews comparing the clothing to 1980s science fiction, Xena, and Wonder Woman? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Neptune (Alexander McQueen collection). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Neptune (Alexander McQueen collection)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
-- RoySmith (talk) 12:02, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
Hello! You closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Super Nova Card Game in 2020, and at the time it had only one review and a couple of other brief sources. I was able to find a two-page review in Inquest Gamer: [7] If that's not quite enough coverage to restore it to article space, would you be willing to restore the article and talk page and move to Drafts so it can be worked on? Thank you! BOZ ( talk) 14:45, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello PMC. Your recent closure of the Soda Tax (Parks and Recreation) AFD has been undone by Jclemens [8], and similar has happened to Lucky Thirteen (House) [9] (which was closed by Explicit).
What can be done about this please? Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 00:45, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Multiple reviews or other reliable, independent, non-trivial commentary demonstrate notability for a television episode.While consensus can change, each of those three AfDs demonstrate that neither the nom nor any participant took the time to find and include the sources I did, and no editor in any of the AfDs argued for any different standard: all of their !votes were policy based (they agreed with that standard) but factually incorrect (they assumed sources didn't exist when they in fact did), and the closing admins just went along and correctly implemented an incorrect discussion.
On 7 May 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article List of Alexander McQueen collections, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that across his thirty-six collections, fashion designer Alexander McQueen contemplated religion, told fairy tales, and criticized the fashion industry? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/List of Alexander McQueen collections. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, List of Alexander McQueen collections), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Aoidh ( talk) 12:03, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi, thank you for your always excellent work! I've uploaded a new version of the fair use image as the original one was too dark and over-saturated. Please let me know if you object to it. BorgQueen ( talk) 14:07, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
On 17 May 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Taxi Driver (Alexander McQueen collection), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that British designer Alexander McQueen partied so hard that he accidentally abandoned the entirety of his second collection among a nightclub's rubbish? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Taxi Driver (Alexander McQueen collection). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page ( here's how, Taxi Driver (Alexander McQueen collection)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru ( talk) 00:03, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Four Award | |
Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work from beginning to end on The Dance of the Twisted Bull. — Bilorv ( talk) 10:19, 21 May 2023 (UTC) |