This user talk page might be
watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated.
No one is perfect even AI's do mis fault. Stay cool, just alert me and I will see it off!
— SafariScribe
Notification of administrators without tools
Greetings, SafariScribe. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title:
What happened to our working draft? I went to save a change and the sandbox no longer exists?
SusunW (
talk) 17:16, 11 May 2024 (UTC)reply
It looks like you asked for it to be deleted? Why? The point is to preserve the history by pointing to the sandbox edits and finish working on sections. I am confused, since I only asked you to move the first section back to the main article.
SusunW (
talk) 17:25, 11 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Thanks. Will come back when I can. Real life stuff is happening at the moment.
SusunW (
talk) 17:37, 11 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Okay, I was able to talk to my mom and everything is okay with her for the moment. Please slow down and do not rush the article. As I said, it will take time and we need to get it right. I told you that I wasn't finished reviewing the LGBT material that was already in the main article, but it is not there anymore and the legacy section is gone. No worries, I will pull what I need from the history. Please note, I plan processes and am a very methodical worker, especially in a peer review. I cannot function well or sign off that things have been completed if the process I outlined is ignored. Of course any time you want, you can stop the peer review, but if you want me to continue mentoring you, please do not anticipate/ignore my instructions. If I ask you to do steps 1, 2, and 3, please do those and stop. Certainly we can discuss things, but I need things to happen in a certain order, unless we mutually agree on another plan. I need to regroup, lots going on right now, but I'll come back to the review later, hopefully today.
SusunW (
talk) 18:10, 11 May 2024 (UTC)reply
I came back to work, but cannot. All of the edits I made this morning to style have disappeared. When you get the sandbox restored, ping me if you want to continue collaborating. I don't have the energy to find all of the sources and rewrite what I already wrote today.
SusunW (
talk) 19:22, 11 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Hello @
BenjaminSchmidt745 and welcome to Wikipedia. Which article do you want make popular, and have you edited before on Wikipedia. I also want to know your previous account.
However, making pages popular especially about yourself is greatly not encouraged. Here is an online encyclopedia and we build articles. I sent you s welcome message where you can find help using the links. It will help you know something's about Wikipedia too. Regards. Safari ScribeEdits!Talk! 23:09, 11 May 2024 (UTC)reply
How do I make my Wikipedia article famous online? --
BenjaminSchmidt745 (
talk) 19:52, 12 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Hi and welcome. I answered that in your first question. Remember that an editor is discouraged to create an article about his/herself and should follow certain rules especially the
WP:COI. Can I see the article in question. Safari ScribeEdits!Talk! 19:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The COVID-19 pandemic ended in April 2024. The virus officially became an endemic virus. The pandemic ended because many people stopped dying and it was no longer a leading cause of death. The COVID-19 virus causes most people to have mild or cold-like symptoms, many have moderate symptoms like they do for the flu, and some even have severe symptoms. However, very few died and it is less common to have severe symptoms than it was before. Most people with mild to moderate symptoms do not get long-COVID. The people that are at risk of dying or having severe symptoms are very immunocompromised people or the elderly, but even most elderly people still survive and most of them have mild to moderate symptoms. COVID-19 is seasonal. COVID-19 now occurs high and has waves in the fall and winter, and goes downhill in spring and summer and waits to come back again in fall and winter. You can still get COVID-19 in the spring and summer, but it is not very common. You may hear people year-round complaining they have the flu or COVID-19, but you should no longer expect to get COVID-19 in spring or summer. However, COVID-19 and the flu are not common in spring or summer, but it is not rare. COVID-19 has mutated so much since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic and has gotten slowly overtime more mild. This is due to people getting herd immunity and natural immunity to COVID-19. This stopped infections killing people as much and the newer variants have become more contagious than they were before, but are more mild and less damaging to our immune systems and for long-COVID or death. Hundreds of people in the world are still dying from COVID-19, but comparing the number of infections this number does seem mild. This number is fewer than the deaths of car crashes now, thankfully. COVID-19 is here to stay and is not leaving. This marks the virus as endemic. We have already had four endemic coronaviruses, and this is our fifth endemic coronavirus that we are just going to have to deal with. We may expect more pandemics and even coronaviruses in the future, but we are in an endemic for now. The COVID-19 pandemic was expected at the start of the pandemic for the virus to be eradicated, but at least it is a seasonal thing and less severe. There were many reasons why COVID-19 was never eradicated. Most people are now living regular pre-COVID lives like they were and it is happening again. There are many variants of COVID-19 and it is hard to stop and it is already in animals and that means it is hard if not impossible to eradicate now. The number of people that test positive for an infection are lower than they were before, but that is because COVID-19 tests do not work as well. Sadly this is true, but you can always use a COVID-19 test at your doctor's office or pharmacy. The good news is that COVID-19 is usually mild and will not require a test and you will have the virus without knowing it or needing a test. The COVID-19 pandemic has officially ended and became endemic in April 2024. This is good news for the world!
BenjaminSchmidt745 (
talk) 20:18, 12 May 2024 (UTC)reply
There was consensus based on the fact that the page views makes
Babita the primary topic over the rest in the DAB page. Though I gave a little weight to your proposal because the one you said of, was already in the DAB page and still not the primary topic. I hope you understand. Thanks. Safari ScribeEdits!Talk! 21:54, 12 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Peter Obi you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
Samoht27 --
Samoht27 (
talk) 16:42, 13 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Notification of administrators without tools
Greetings, SafariScribe. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title:
I've added a new image of Paulo Dybala (I know I'm obsessed with him but thats besides the point) which can be used but when adding AS Roma tag below, no link appears. Could you fix and explain how I can for the future?
I have done that. It's wonderful you just entered Wikipedia and has known all of this like "piping", literally use of pipes (|). Have you edited previously with any other account? Safari ScribeEdits!Talk! 21:58, 14 May 2024 (UTC)reply
No I haven't. I just saw "Argentina national football| Argentina.
I just want to be able to update any info I can do on my favourite topics :)
Alex.Dybala (
talk) 22:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Couldn't "Dybala in 2023" be changed to Dybala playing for (A.S Roma|AS Roma) in 2023
Alex.Dybala (
talk) 22:04, 14 May 2024 (UTC)reply
No, leave it as it is in the current state. Remember you can say "with football". Best, for images, it's written in the circa or date. Safari ScribeEdits!Talk! 22:09, 14 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Is this normal? When I search up Paulo Dybala on the search bar, the face isn't centred in the photo. Is there anyway to fix that? --
Alex.Dybala (
talk) 04:43, 15 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Thats not the goal of Wikipedia. You can usually see images on the third image carousel of a Google panel. It isn't necessary and you should focus on editing or creating more articles that will be beneficial. Safari ScribeEdits!Talk! 06:03, 15 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Rejection of new article
I recently submitted a new article covering an
emerging British feminist author which was rejected by you for not having reliable sources. I am confused by this decision, as the article included sourcing from several major news publications and publishing industry news outlets. Would you be able to explain your decision so I can improve the article?
Arcadianlandscape (
talk) 13:55, 15 May 2024 (UTC)reply
It wasn't rejected, it was declined for further improvement. It is a different thing to say "rejected" (that the topic is off from Wikipedia policy and goal), while "declined" (is that it isn't so good for inclusion in the mainspace. More improvements will be done for that). I hope you understand the meaning of the two. However, it was declined as lacking reliable source at the time of submission. Thanks. Safari ScribeEdits!Talk! 17:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Thanks for your reply and clarification. I am no clearer on the reliable sources issue: there were multiple news publications including The Times and The Bookseller (a well-respected journal of the publishing industry), so I am unsure how the assessment was made.
Arcadianlandscape (
talk) 21:21, 15 May 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Arcadianlandscape, you can also take a look at
WP:RS for what we call reliable sources or the assessment
here. You can also check
WP:NAUTHOR, where we have the place to check whether the subject you're writing on meets that criteria. Regards. Safari ScribeEdits!Talk! 21:25, 15 May 2024 (UTC)reply
@
SafariScribe Would it be possible for you to review the submission again? I am confident the revised submission meets the guidelines. Thanks in advance.
Arcadianlandscape (
talk) 12:26, 27 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Unexplained CSD tag removal and misuse of rollback
Eklashpur High School – I guess appropriate usage, restored an AfD that had been removed, but better served using an undo and edit summary explaining they shouldn't have removed the AfD template
If you keep up without being more careful about your rollback usage you will likely end up losing the perm. Pinging the granter (@
Malinaccier) in case they wish to comment.
Hey man im josh (
talk) 16:12, 15 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Hi @
Hey man im josh, thanks for looping me in. SafariScribe, please make sure to only use rollback for obvious cases of vandalism. Basically, you should never use rollback any time that you ought to be writing an edit summary. If this pattern continues, any administrator can remove the permission without further warning, so please be careful. Malinaccier (
talk) 18:53, 15 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please
consult the documentation and please get in touch on
SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
Please review
Criteria for Speedy Deletion so you are better familiar with the criteria for speedy deletion. Do not tag pages for speedy deletion unless they meet a CSD criteria EXACTLY. You can not make up reasons why a page should be speedied. For example, redirects are not deleted because the page title is close to an article title. In fact, that is a good reason to create a redirect because it is close to an actual article title.
It's very important if you are going to be patrolling to correctly tag pages for speedy deletion because they all need to be reviewed and it wastes other editors' time if they need to review and decline pages you have tagged for speedy deletion. The best way to avoid this is to know the CSD criteria so well that you get it right every time. Some of the criteria seem obvious but the wording for them is very precise so never guess, if you aren't sure then go to
WP:CSD to confirm your suspicions. Thank you. LizRead!Talk! 23:56, 16 May 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Liz, thanks for reminding me. I was a bit confused there, thank God it has been clarified and i'do be more careful in the future. Safari ScribeEdits!Talk! 00:11, 17 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Sudden Deletion of photos from the page
Hello @
SafariScribe Recently some photos have been deleted by someone from the page. When I check, it shows copyright violation.actualy those photos are taken by and uploaded by my team which is also uploaded in my Instagram handle. Copyright is associated with the photo uploaded in Instagram. I haven't applied for any copyright issues so far. Can u please fix it.
Thanking You.
Defendersofhistory (
talk) 11:26, 17 May 2024 (UTC)reply
They have marks per my previous revision. I don't seem to know why you cleared the former discussion, however, it isn't also a bad one. I am not the right person for this as I also have problems with uploading images to Commons. Courtesy ping to
Vanderwaalforces who may know about photos. Safari ScribeEdits!Talk! 12:37, 17 May 2024 (UTC)reply
I see you haven't made the suggestions in the articles talk page. I need your help if you insist on knowing better the topic. Regards. Safari ScribeEdits!Talk! 12:43, 17 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Which talk page do I need to suggest. This one or article's talk page.i am confused
Defendersofhistory (
talk) 12:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC)reply
It would be well pleased and comfortable if u contact me through my professional email.
Defendersofhistory (
talk) 12:45, 17 May 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Defendersofhistory If only you read what
c:COM:NETCOPYVIO said before uploading those images. Without doing any personal explanation, let me copy-paste what it says here for you.
This is quite self-explanatory, do not pick images from random websites and upload to Commons unless you have been given the permission from the original owner of the image to reuse the image and it follows Commons'
c:COM:LICENSE.
Vanderwaalforces (
talk) 12:46, 17 May 2024 (UTC)reply
@
VanderwaalforcesThanks for ur Kind Reply.. I want to inform you that, the so called image has been uploaded by me in my Instagram page and I have not issued any copyright to it so far. I have not borrowed or downloaded those images from any public platform. It has been uploaded by my team itself. If it's a copyright violation, fine let it be. I have no issues.
Defendersofhistory (
talk) 12:51, 17 May 2024 (UTC)reply
You closed that discussion before the ordinary 7-day discussion period. Please reopen it. —
BarrelProof (
talk) 12:42, 17 May 2024 (UTC)reply
@
BarrelProof, it isn't a must that a request should reach the 7-days period for discussion when there are all support and no opposing for even a relist. Welp, I will reopen the discussion. Safari ScribeEdits!Talk! 12:45, 17 May 2024 (UTC)reply
@
BarrelProof, before I could reopen it, it has been technically moved. If you insist of getting the previous title, I wouldn't mind calling for the revert. Or you request another move. Thanks! Safari ScribeEdits!Talk! 12:53, 17 May 2024 (UTC)reply
I want it moved back and reopened. I have been planning to comment. It is obvious if you look back at the history of that discussion that it has been contentious for years and years. It should not have been closed prematurely. Only two people commented before the premature closure. Per
WP:RMEC, RMs should "should remain open for at least seven days (168 hours)", with few exceptions —
BarrelProof (
talk) 12:56, 17 May 2024 (UTC)reply
@
BarrelProof, you seemed to be somewhat arguing as if my close wasn't correctly done. There is already a clear consensus and per same
WP:RMEC, it's few days to the closure but still, there is already a consensus. I have requested the technical reversion of the move while you continue your edits thereafter. Thanks! Safari ScribeEdits!Talk! 13:07, 17 May 2024 (UTC)reply
It was only one day early, but it was early. —
BarrelProof (
talk) 13:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC)reply
You're a trouble maker who wants to drag me this hot afternoon where I stay. Ok, I agree, come and flog me so that I will another time.😂 Safari ScribeEdits!Talk! 13:13, 17 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Sorry for the impatience. —
BarrelProof (
talk) 15:07, 17 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Thank you brother Safariscribe for the edit I believe you helped to edit to attain standard and good for main space acceptance. God bless.
Frankincense Diala (
talk) 14:29, 17 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Awwww. Thank you @
Frankincense Diala. It was very difficult reformatting that heavy draft. An AFC reviewer will look into it. Regards. Safari ScribeEdits!Talk! 16:45, 17 May 2024 (UTC)reply
I am most grateful... I have learnt something from the editing even.
Frankincense Diala (
talk) 12:43, 23 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Yes oo... It has just being published in the main space o.. Daalụ nwanne... trust you are Igbo
Frankincense Diala (
talk) 20:53, 28 May 2024 (UTC)reply
However, on the article, the "Created by" is showing my IP address instead of my Username, can that be corrected?
Frankincense Diala (
talk) 22:50, 28 May 2024 (UTC)reply
User talk:E-358-lit
While your intent in
doing this was obviously in good faith, you were interrupting an ongoing conversation. There was no need to archive the discussion, and per
WP:USERTALKSTOP should not have been done. The user had already expressed their desired changes on the article's talk page, and I was trying to assist the user without having a bunch of policy/guideline/essay pages thrown at them. Some of what I was expressing to them had nothing to do with the article directly, and had to do with Wikipedia in general as well. I have reverted your removal of the content. Let E-358-lit do that if they so choose to do so. Thanks, --
Hammersoft (
talk) 20:38, 17 May 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Hammersoft, Oh! My bad, sorry for the misinterpretation. If the discussion is still on course, please help me unarchive it. Thanks. Please I do hope you aren't angry? Safari ScribeEdits!Talk! 20:42, 17 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Angry? No. You're currently reading words coming from the master of screwups :) I've already undone the edits. With your approval, I can delete
User talk:E-358-lit/Archive 1. Sound good? --
Hammersoft (
talk) 20:45, 17 May 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Hammersoft, nobody answered me and I screamed to my self. For directing me wrongly, I'll have to stalk you. Off I go to your TP. 😂 Safari ScribeEdits!Talk! 20:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Oh hell. I'm in for it now! Maybe I should preemptively archive my user talk page. Except, I don't have user talk archives. Uh oh! --
Hammersoft (
talk) 20:56, 17 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Sorry @
SafariScribe, I posted the same question below but blanked it since Hammersoft beat me to it. Fully understand your intention was to clean up some huge walls of text, especially since some of the comments were tagged as potential self promotion. I would only say that I don't think there are many cases where one should archive discussions on other people's talk pages. That could be very confusing to a newcomer as well, so it might be best to try to avoid it in the future. But, no harm no foul.
Mokadoshi (
talk) 20:57, 17 May 2024 (UTC)reply
I
Hello, it would be better if u make a change in the history of the Diocese. It's now incomplete and mis leading. U may use the history in the official website of the diocese as a reliable source.
Thank u
Defendersofhistory (
talk) 02:32, 18 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Defendersofhistory, I'm not SafariScribe (and I'm also not a "u"), but I have some questions here. You were talking, above, about things NOT being copyright violations--well, you can't just copy and paste things, and even if there had been the proper license (same with the Instagram pictures),
this was not a good edit. This is an encyclopedia, not a copy of y'all's website. Now, when I look at
Roman Catholic Diocese of Cochin, I see that SafariScribe has done a lot of work of exactly the kind that Wikipedians should be doing. I have not seen you work on that article, besides two small edits. Finally, no, the "official website of the diocese" is not automatically a reliable source, I'm afraid: it's a primary source, one that's obviously not neutral, which leads me to my last point--but that will be clear by the COI template I'm about to put on your talk page.
Drmies (
talk) 02:42, 18 May 2024 (UTC)reply
I am not going to contest it, because it is useless, just to remark here that none of the supports is policy based (none of them tried to argue
WP:COMMONNAME as required by the policy, which must have been the focus of the discussion), and that saying that I did not provide any evidence means that you have not looked at the article. Pretty bad close in my opinion.
Ymblanter (
talk) 08:09, 21 May 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Ymblanter, I noticed the move lacking "relist" after a certain period of time. I know where you are going to, however, I took the source presented by the nominator and the other "support" (against your rationale). I don't find what you argued as provided with no source and per Roman Spinner, the lede was as the proposed title sourced too. I know it was bad but I also want to know you're happy forgiving the mishap. Do you mind I do reopen it? Safari ScribeEdits!Talk! 08:21, 21 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Yes, I think it is fine to reopen. I do not necessarily argue against the move (otherwise I would have voted oppose), but I want the move to be based on policy-based arguments and not on opinions of users who in some way are affiliated with one side of the conflict. If there is no evidence of COMMONNAME at the moment, may be it should be closed as no consensus, and we can wait for the evidence. Thanks for considering this and being responsive.
Ymblanter (
talk) 08:31, 21 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Sorry, forgot to comment about the lede. It is a remnant of an undiscussed move.
Ymblanter (
talk) 08:31, 21 May 2024 (UTC)reply
It was of course just reclosed (the closer presumably thought it was reopened in error), and the same team of biased users went on to provide literally the same arguments for other pages. I just took all of them off my watchlist.
Ymblanter (
talk) 19:09, 23 May 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Ymblanter, I didn't see that, and I am so sorry. It's now I am seeing the closure and just thought of same too. Please don't remove them from your watchlist, they are needed for upkeep. I will reopen the discussion for further
consensus because it's more than necessary. Thanks. Safari ScribeEdits!Talk! 22:29, 23 May 2024 (UTC)reply
I would just let it go. If the current situation is that multiple closers move multiple pages on a request of two clearly partisan users who have no policy-based arguments, there is very little I can do about it. We just need to remember that this area of Wikipedia is full of propaganda which was deliberately added there.
Ymblanter (
talk) 05:31, 24 May 2024 (UTC)reply
To be clear, SafariScribe, you can reopen an RM if you also revert the move. But reopening without reverting the move is what caused this to be a "
malformed request".
I also came here because I noticed you've been closing several RMs before 7 days have elapsed. When you do that, you should note that it is an early closure (
WP:RMEC) and why you're closing it early. I would recommend not closing them early unless there is some special reason not to wait the standard 7 days.
SilverLocust💬 05:43, 27 May 2024 (UTC)reply
@
SilverLocust, thank you for that observance. However, I do close pages move request earlier when I know there is already a consensus. Thanks. Safari ScribeEdits!Talk! 05:45, 27 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Forgive my curiosity, may I ask what prompted you to take the task on?
The reason I ask is that the creating editor first solicited me on my talk page to write this article, presumably for pay since she is a paid editor, and then asked me where she might find other editors willing to write the article, presumably for pay.
I am not casting aspersions on your motives, nor am I accusing you of writing this for pay. I think the draft needed the massive improvements you are bringing to it. 🇺🇦
FiddleTimtrentFaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 09:44, 21 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Ah! Now I understand. I see you were prompted by kindness. Thank you, and, perhaps, please forgive my impertinence. 🇺🇦
FiddleTimtrentFaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 09:47, 21 May 2024 (UTC)reply
@
Timtrent, you were the one who inspired me to take in that draft. I was about replying an edit at AFC/help board and saw your comments, which made me to look at your contributions and then to talk. Seeing the draft also, I saw your comment of passing FILM PRODUCER. Welp, I wasn't invited my anyone but I hate seeing much comment without helping the draft. I also know I am not looking at any payment because if so, I would have not being happy with the editor since I hate paid editing. I just use my time making a difference, such unwanted to make in
Simon Ekpa, and the many from the ongoing peer review on Adichie. Look the the editors talk page too and see my message there. Safari ScribeEdits!Talk! 09:50, 21 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Yes, after I posted I saw your interaction with the creating editor. I see true altruism in you. I do hope your work doesn't allow her to be paid. She deserves no pay for the work she has done.
Probably, it would be wise to submit it for review after you have made it as good as you can, and allow it to sink or swim. I think it will swim. Other eyes are always good when we finish a difficult task. I will not review it again, though it is now in a radically different state after your excellent and brutal edits 🇺🇦
FiddleTimtrentFaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 10:01, 21 May 2024 (UTC)reply
I am sad too to see myself edit for an editor who will make no impact. But aside from that, if we don't help out, though she/they are loosing but it doesn't leave the fact that the article may be notable and it's out of good faith. Thanks for that as we all help in clearing the heavy backlog. It as much love cleaning up articles, it leaves me with joy of seeing good and neat articles. Thanks for the encouragement. Safari ScribeEdits!Talk! 10:24, 21 May 2024 (UTC)reply
It was declined because it has less source to establish notability. I may look at the draft later. Safari ScribeEdits!Talk! 06:22, 22 May 2024 (UTC)reply
The sources you added still doesn't show the article meets our notability guidelines per
WP:ORG. However per
WP:NSCHOOL, a existence of a school which I have confirmed doesn't mean that school merits an article. So your draft has been redirected to the subject topic. Thank you. Safari ScribeEdits!Talk! 09:15, 22 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Redirecting is the best option here as when you may have publish it to mainspace, it will be deleted or redirected. That's usual per
WP:SCHOOLOUTCOME. Safari ScribeEdits!Talk! 18:23, 22 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please
consult the documentation and please get in touch on
SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
Congratulations on ranking among the
top three most active pending changes reviewers in the last 30 days. Excellent work! –
DreamRimmer (talk) 09:12, 26 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Good afternoon, I'm highly honored to be mentored by you as I hope to learn alot, I'd like to ask on how I can go about to create a page for an artist or a biography for an artist... thank you --
A6ixxvibez (
talk) 14:19, 26 May 2024 (UTC)reply
disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a
primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is an
orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by
visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 14:12, 27 May 2024 (UTC)reply
David Wicht, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its
talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they
develop over time. You may like to take a look at the
grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to
Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to
create articles yourself without posting a request to
Articles for creation.
Hello @
God devotee, and welcome to Wikipedia. To make an edit to a semi-protected page, you have to make the edit request per
WP:PP if you are a new user or for any level of protection.
It looks like you may need
page mover rights soon, given your
WP:RM closures (meeting the third criterion at
WP:PMCRITERIA). Obviously, you have made more than 3,000 edits, meeting the second criterion. The only problem is that you have not yet been a registered user for at least 6 months, so you may ask for those rights as soon as July 13 or later (to meet the first criterion), if you answer "no" for the following question (meeting the fourth criterion):
Have you had any recent behavioral blocks or
WP:3RR violations?
Thank you @
GTrang. I have had such an invitation in the early days but as it stands, I don't meet the criterion 1 of
WP:PMCRITERIA. I wouldn't mind reaching the six months. Thanks. Safari ScribeEdits!Talk! 17:04, 29 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Hi, thank you for your contributions. I'll note that your close of this discussion is premature; RMs should stay open at least 7 days.
162 etc. (
talk) 17:04, 29 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Per
WP:RMEC, the closure is considerable as
WP:SNOWCLOSE. I have also made up not closing earlier than expected. I appreciate your kind intentions and who am I not to incorporate them. Thank you. Safari ScribeEdits!Talk! 17:10, 29 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Clearly, I support the end result, since I proposed the move. However, less than 48 hours (!) is not enough time for an RM, even though all the editors involved thus far have supported the proposed title. Not everybody is on this website on a daily basis, and others should have the time to be involved too.
162 etc. (
talk) 19:03, 29 May 2024 (UTC)reply
I get it. Even if you weren't the proposer, there is always need that I shall reopen (which I will not live to do after cautions). Great thanks 162 etc. Safari ScribeEdits!Talk! 19:15, 29 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Please also stop closing/relisting RMs after 6 days.
WP:RMEC is very clear about what it means by 7 days: 168 hours. That is, when the request is below
WP:RMC#Elapsed listings. There was no reason, for example, to close
Talk:Theodore Morse 22 hours early with only 3 participants.
SilverLocust💬 04:38, 2 June 2024 (UTC)reply
@
SilverLocust, I am not doubting your good faith intentions and previous correction. However, I also know that when a move request is highly likely to be 'move', onw should go ahead and same applicable vice versa. I don't think there will be move review for that. Thanks. Safari ScribeEdits!Talk! 04:49, 2 June 2024 (UTC)reply
I was writing a reply at the
technical request before it was withdrawn, so I'll just put it here.
The norm is for RMs to be left open for 7 days so that people have that opportunity to see the discussion. Some editors, including me, will check RMs more often when they are near elapsing (6–7 days) to see if we want to comment, rather than when they were first opened. There have been several times that I have opposed an uncontested request after six or seven days. "It can sometimes be better to allow a few extra days even if current discussion seems very clearly to hold one opinion, to avoid precluding significant input and as a courtesy to ensure that it really will be a snowball" (emphasis added) (quoting
WP:RMEC).
And it's not enough that the request looks obviously correct, unless "there is clearly no need at all to prolong discussion further" (emphasis added). For example, a snow close may be useful when the request is nonsensical, or when it is actively wasting the time of many users, or when it is a repeat request of a recently closed RM.
It is considerably more common to have a "not moved.
WP:SNOW" closure
[1] than a "moved.
WP:SNOW" closure
[2], since
WP:SNOW is more focused on when "an issue has no chance of succeeding". It's much easier to conclude that an argument that has been made has no possible chance of success rather than that all possible counterarguments that nobody has yet offered have no chance of success.)
Also, early closures should have a closing comment that makes clear that it was closed early, so that people are aware of that. This can be as simple as adding the comment "
WP:SNOW" after the result.
SilverLocust💬 04:01, 3 June 2024 (UTC)reply
disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a
primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is an
orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by
visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with
Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 19:57, 29 May 2024 (UTC)reply
This is for the particular redirect created from Dissam assist tool. Safari ScribeEdits!Talk! 20:01, 29 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please
consult the documentation and please get in touch on
SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
Hello! Somebody wrote an article about my grandfather (he was an Armenian painter) in Armenian language. Now i started working on organizing his legacy and wanted to translate the page about him to English, but the system says i can't do that because i don't have experience. I wonder if you can suggest what to do in this situation --
Lauder12 (
talk) 07:04, 31 May 2024 (UTC)reply
If your grandfather is notable, writing about him may infringe our rule on
WP:COI. I can help but will check if he is notable. May I get the link? Safari ScribeEdits!Talk! 07:10, 31 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Oh! Do you mean
this. It's quite notable though I want say I am good in translation. I saw the name from your user page and per
WP:COMMONSENSE. I will draft it first to AFC and subsequently analyse the notability. Safari ScribeEdits!Talk! 07:14, 31 May 2024 (UTC)reply
AFC Champions League 2 move
I'm confused because I was showing Support to move AFC Champions League -2 →
AFC Champions League Two – not to
AFC Cup. At first, it was announced as AFC Champions League 2, but was later officially branded as AFC Champions League Two. So the article title should be AFC Champions League Two.
That appears to be what the majority are supporting. So why has it gone back to the
AFC Cup article name when you moved it?
Matilda Maniac (
talk) 14:16, 31 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Your closure of the discussion as "no consensus" does not reflect the discussion that has taken place, I am not sure if that was by accident or not. But your closure looks like a
supervote which a discretion reserved for admins but even then, they will explain in details why they reached a certain opinion that is not obvious from the discussion.
How that make sense and I did not close the move discussion as I was involved the discussion, but feel free to go back and close the move properly.
FuzzyMagma (
talk) 08:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC)reply
That's okay by me. I know no matter which way, a review will still be initiated. Many thanks. Safari ScribeEdits!Talk! 08:51, 2 June 2024 (UTC)reply
No, not necessarily. This one was a dry cut.
In general, maybe it is better to participate more in AfD discussion (although
I see you have plenty of experience) and other move discussion before jumping to closing. Tbh I am still not sure why you closed the discussion as no consensus. Maybe you want to elaborate more?
FuzzyMagma (
talk) 08:58, 2 June 2024 (UTC)reply
@
DaxServer that is one way to do that, and if @
SafariScribe explained here that they believe the closure was not a mistake, I will revert my revert and escalate to
Wikipedia:Move review.
Given SafariScribe experience, I am operating under the
assumption that the closure was a mistake because it does not make any sense. I mean that is why I am here, to discuss
FuzzyMagma (
talk) 09:03, 2 June 2024 (UTC)reply
In the future, please do not revert the closures, despite what you assume. Ask the closure to revert and if they disagree we move for a review. —
DaxServer (
t·
m·
e·
c) 09:06, 2 June 2024 (UTC)reply
ok, noted. @
SafariScribe please let me know if you want me to reinstate your edit
FuzzyMagma (
talk) 09:07, 2 June 2024 (UTC)reply
@
DaxServer, thank you for the reminder. I thought so when I saw the revert but I have no say because I know @
FuzzyMagma will leave a message hence, I could have questioned either. I have had much experience in page moving and closing but this one is just though and with a strong spirit, concluding that it will still be closed near as I do. @
FuzzyMagma, DaxServer is correct. Before reverting ones edit which is not obvious vandalism, first know why before reverting and even, before going to
WP:MOVEREVIEW. I have no problem reverting my edits like I said earlier, it's just that today is Sunday in mt time zone and who am I not to cheer up. I was sleep deprived but ate a lot this morning. @
DaxServer, thank you also. Will both of you want a cookie? Of course I will! Safari ScribeEdits!Talk! 09:23, 2 June 2024 (UTC)reply
(
talk page stalker) SafariScribe, Happy Sunday and I hope you’re enjoying your day :). Mistakes have been made (by both of you) but it’s not too late to go for move review. So, do you want FuzzyMagma to revert his reversion and go to move review, or let it be closed by someone else?
Vanderwaalforces (
talk) 09:42, 2 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Happy Sunday too. Let it be closed by someone else. We've settled that issue. No one is going for a review as the discussion is still open and everybody is cool. The weather is cold to talk much. FuzzyMagma behaved matured enough by fixing it himself. However, there were few mistakes DaxServer has corrected. Safari ScribeEdits!Talk! 09:46, 2 June 2024 (UTC)reply
(team player 17, can the page be updated since sources prove he is not retired?!)
93.138.236.53 (
talk) 18:49, 2 June 2024 (UTC)reply
The source you provided isn't reliable. Convince me by providing news sources that are reliable per
WP:RS. Safari ScribeEdits!Talk! 19:05, 2 June 2024 (UTC)reply
I’m sorry guys, @
Safari Scribe, @
Reading Beans, @
Vanderwaalforces. But it’s unfair to nominate all my articles for deletions it’s not fair, accept my apologies and withdraw your nomination please.
Madeforall1 (
talk) 07:42, 3 June 2024 (UTC)reply
No one nominated all your articles for nominations. Retaliatory nomination is considered bad faith. The polo club doesn’t look so notable to me so I don’t think it can be withdrawn unless consensus states so. Best,
Reading Beans 07:51, 3 June 2024 (UTC)reply
I have apologized Sir, it’s all good now but the one for “Dumo Lulu Briggs” i think you should search the news tab, i believe you know him.
Madeforall1 (
talk) 08:06, 3 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Hello @
Safari Scribe I saw you close the AFD, Can you do justice? As per mine meeting Wikipedia GNG
Madeforall1 (
talk) 08:12, 3 June 2024 (UTC)reply
May 2024 GOCE drive award
The Minor Barnstar
This barnstar is awarded to SafariScribe for copy edits totaling between 1 and 3,999 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the
GOCE May 2024 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions!
Dhtwiki (
talk) 09:10, 3 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Confused
From AFD - what does "Maybe this is one of the deprecated places needing attention I. Wikipedia. That doesn't mean a clergy if such office won't be entered" mean?
Geschichte (
talk) 20:53, 3 June 2024 (UTC)reply
I can see typographical error in the text. Can you link the AFD, lemme take a look at it. I can't efficiently remember. Safari ScribeEdits!Talk! 21:39, 3 June 2024 (UTC)reply
I have cleaned up the article here
Peter Seah Lim Huat. Please do not add spams and unverifiable materials. Those you did that got a notable draft declined. Now I wish to ask, why do you have to resubmit when you didn't do what other reviewers asked to get the article as clean as? Safari ScribeEdits!Talk! 14:33, 4 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Okay, thank you. I thought I had done what they asked me to do, sorry.
GuapMachine (
talk) 01:41, 5 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone (2001 video game)
This move appears to be incomplete though the link updates have been done. --
ferret (
talk) 19:28, 4 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Strike that, I must have needed a refresh. --
ferret (
talk) 19:29, 4 June 2024 (UTC)reply
No! You are right. There was problem with WP technology that it closed the move without moving directly as directed in the script. However, I've manually moved it. Thanks for reminding me. Safari ScribeEdits!Talk! 19:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)reply