This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Ashish.t7 ( talk) 05:59, 3 January 2018 (UTC) I have seen your message on my Talk Page. Couldn't really understand on violation of guidelines as I took content from web & also verified each detail from public source news etc. Please do suggest how can I make it better as I think without defining group structure, it gives incorrect view to reader.
Respectfully guessing that less is more. Gratuitous info about commonness of surname and meaning? Hoping to be less of a magpie myself -- if brave enough to attempt another Wiki edit. BTW, the Russian spelling came from the source cited by me, and not the obituary cited. Thank you. This is my first time composing a TALK PAGE message. 72.129.236.87 ( talk) 06:43, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
I made edits on the page for Acts of the Apostles that featured original research and speculation. Prior to my edits the article suggested that the work is an answer to a theological question, while the Christian community has opposing beliefs. I agree my edits were not based on sound research, however I think the article should make it clear that the book is regarded highly within certain communities. Also, there seems to be a fair bit of assumption within the "researched" aspects of the article. The writer assumes features of ancient texts that are not present in the Gospels (e.g. the events are not necessarily chronological in Mark, have interval breaks in Luke, etc.). Forgive me if I am wrong, but many, if not all, of the "outright [contradictions]" can be explained very easily by somebody well versed in New Testament history and theology. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mv23z ( talk • contribs) 10:38, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
I see you recently accepted a pending change to January 26.
You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages are no longer exempt from WP:V and direct sources are required for additions. For details see the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide. I've gone ahead and un-accepted this edit and backed it out.
Please do not accept additions to day of year pages where no direct source has been provided on that page. The burden to provide sources for additions to these pages is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages. Thank you. Toddst1 ( talk) 01:46, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
You have no idea what you erased is at the university of Dalhousie are still stud in the illness it's usually a mixture of ADHD , General anxiety disorder and bipolar as we'll please take this serious As we are just letting the medical world know a new mental illness Tinkie tubby ( talk) 05:43, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
It is a confirmed source from various platforms which don't need to be cited, as far the resources has been confirmed, they have been collected from The Times of India and Mumbai Mirror. Revert the changes, and let the 2018 investigation be on topic. Rekonedth ( talk) 10:48, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Greyjoy The source is a reliable and a near to perfect source as confirmed by the law officials as well as the CBI. They have confirmed that Nirav Modi has done the fraud and are looking into a further detailed published inquiry for the same. As for the media plus reliableness of the factual source goes, it has been taken into consideration that even the news, media, published magazines have unearthed the money laundering case against Nirav Modi. If you have any evidence which opposes the source, then please put that forward, in an order, for the same. Rekonedth ( talk). —Preceding undated comment added 11:00, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
I think the problem has been resolved. Rekonedth ( talk) 11:29, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi Plasy123 ( talk) 07:37, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
I'm sorry I'm new to wikithingy ☺ Plasy123 ( talk) 07:40, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi
I have added some text to KSFE's wikipedia page in the History section and removed some part as well. It seems like you have removed it. While I accept that the part I added was not pertaining to the History section, it was factually true and relevant information nevertheless. Can it be added to a new section?
Disclosure: I work in KSFE.
Glancingcliffs ( talk) 01:56, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
I notice that the For Britain page is contantly subject to slanderous comment by Wikipedia contributors. The party is - as declared - neither left nor right. If Wikipedia wishes to retain any credibility, then defamatory content must not be allowed to remain in situ. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mariuswaskilledbybarbarians ( talk • contribs) 06:47, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
The article Daniel Tatarsky has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails to show notability as per WP:ENTERTAINER
The text I deleted was misleading/wrong for the following reasons: 1. The first statement that "Kirkpatrick has proposed seven bills regarding veterans" is true. 2. The second statement that out of those 7 bills "five of which have passed" that's wrong. If you go to the govtrack website that is cited you'll see, if you filtered the sponsored bills to just those enacted, that only 3 bills she has ever introduced have passed. Out of those three only one is a veterans bill. Even if you consider bills that at least passed the House you'll see only 3 veterans bills are listed. Not to mention the wording "five of which have passed" is misleading as it fails to specify what chamber has it passed or if had been enacted. 3. The two numbered bills mentioned in the section to have been among the bills passed, never passed. One of those bills is not even listed on that cited page.
I won't delete the section again. But I will rewrite it to be more accurate and reflective of the information contained on the cited page. If you are not politically motivated and respectfully considered my arguments you will not undo my changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uadude1 ( talk • contribs) 05:39, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
way you have to undo them? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexursu ( talk • contribs) 13:15, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
If it were not for this alleged, and CONFIRMED FAKE!, heterochromia, sarah would have a page of its own? I do not think so, it's a girl like there are so many, and having eyes of a different color, and it's not her case !, it's not a talent or something that is enough to have a page of its own. Some people are so dumb to believe that the color of their eyes is real ... it is so obvious that they are COLORED CONTACT LENSES, and all the photos posted, including video, show it widely. I do not therefore understand why they are not valid as proofs, what is necessary, holy spirit? She is only a POSER who wants other people thinks “she's so different and beautiful”. No. In addition, it seems that she is also HOMOPHOBIC, which makes her a person even more false and unpleasant…! At last, it's interesting that there is linked her instagram profile, almost an invitation to follow her… However I repeat: how do you (referred to anyone) not understand from the things posted that she lies? And do not bring out the talk of montage and various crap. If even the words and images provided by his father aren't reliable, I do not know what you need... In addition to the fact that even in the photos not posted by him that IT'S OBVIOUS ALSO FOR A BLIND PERSON THAT SHE WEARS COLORED COSMETIC LENS. She's a pathological liar and will continue to lie.
Maybe I'm a bit bitter, but I am bothered by false people who claim to be what is not. It's simply ANNOYING!!
PS: I didn't find the discussion page you referred to.
Hoax11 ( talk) 05:06, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
Now I found it and I read it, but in all honesty it seems to me a BIG BULLSH-1-T. Even the so-called "reliable sources" can sin of naivete, right? So since an "important" source says something, that thing is surely and unquestionably true? Please. I understand that maybe someone is "ashamed", or simply distrusts, from "non-canonical" sources, but why do they deny the evidence only because the evidences come from non-canonical sources? Again, please...
Hoax11 ( talk) 05:28, 22 April 2018 (UTC)++
This source say that her eyes are hazel, therefore they may have SLIGHTLY cleared during growth (slightly, because they look like dark hazel/brown), but certainly she doesn't have heterochromia...!!! ---> http://archive.is/TbCti
Hoax11 ( talk) 05:40, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
Maybe I could add this information WITHOUT DELETING those that I previously inserted, in consideration of the aforementioned.
Hoax11 ( talk) 05:52, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello Greyjoy!
I would like to know what the process was to create an official wikipedia page for celebrities. Please advise.
Thank you,
LaWr123 (
talk) 05:41, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Okay! So there’s no special portal to go through for celebrities? It’s the same as creating a page for anyone?
Thank you for answering so quickly — Preceding unsigned comment added by LaWr123 ( talk • contribs) 16:20, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Thank you so much!
You have made a mistake in your succinct evaluation of my unfinished edit and I am gathering sources as I type this message for that article. I'm gathering links and to my knowledge, I can not yet provide screenshots in the form of uploaded images. The content of /b/ is too graphic to be linked to Wikipedia so I will link the /pol/-based content with the news articles and the people of Wikipedia can decide for themselves what to believe. I'm very aware of what I am doing and every word in my edit is the truth which is backed by actual, objective evidence which I can and will provide, thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Exposing4chan ( talk • contribs) 06:55, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi Greyjoy, Thank you so much for your notes. I'm the summer intern at the school district's communications department, and one of my projects is updating the wikipedia page. I didn't realize that I couldn't copy/paste from the district website, so thanks for letting me know! I'll start working on paraphrases and upload those once they're ready. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Studiousstrwbry ( talk • contribs) 12:27, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
Are you fucking mad Joven salvaje ( talk) 06:03, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Real birthdate is 1988 dude he said it himself in one interview ....u can check it out Joven salvaje ( talk) 06:06, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Not only one interview many times his birthdate is stated as 1988 in many newspaper articles mainly in times of india and bombay times u can check it out Joven salvaje ( talk) 06:10, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
I dont remember the exact date of that article ....but i am damn sure about this birthdate....it was clearly stated as 1988. Joven salvaje ( talk) 06:19, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Just search it on google the second article is there named "everything is falling into place" of mumbai mirror read it completely you will get my point Joven salvaje ( talk) 06:23, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi I was wondering about the copyright on photos found around the internet. I looked at the Wikipedia Commons page about Upload Wizard but I wasn't sure about what photos were copyright. Am i just allowed to use any picture online if it has no labels about copyright? Also how do we tell if the content is older than 150 years?
I'm sorry if your not the right person to ask but I didn't know who else to ask or what articles to look at that cover this
Edith Edits Your Poor Mistakes ( talk) 09:13, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Ok thanks Edith Edits Your Poor Mistakes ( talk) 09:38, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm new at wiki, also my mother language is Spanish. I edited a line at Guerrero's profile, deleting the word "cocaine" of the sentence because Guerrero didn't give positive for ingest "cocaine", he gave a "adverse analytical result" as a result of contamination with coca tea. I'm pharmaceutical chemist and the terminology can be misinterpreted. All this you can check with official CAS, FIFA and WADA sources. Greetings. Xxvicsebxx ( talk) 04:06, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Please look at Alpha Phi Omega (Philippines) and let me know if any issues for referencing you had with it have been dealt with. Naraht ( talk) 17:46, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
I know you welcomed this editor. Perhaps you want to keep an eye on him? He is already incorrectly reverting other editors. https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:EggRoll97&diff=843122774&oldid=842890880
That's not good. And when I left a note, he just deleted it (maybe he is a former editor?). -- 2604:2000:E010:1100:91B6:15E1:BB7C:A231 ( talk) 01:29, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
I have attempted to make good contributions. As for the two reverts I made that were disagreed with, I have not contested them, as I can see the reverter's point, and I accept their logic. I am a new-ish editor, but I have been learning about Wikipedia for a while before I formally joined. I do not wish to cause any problems, nor do I wish to start an argument. I apologize if any of my current or future edits are wrong, and I invite anyone to revert them back if they believe I have made an error. I am a human, and I make mistakes, and I want those mistakes to be pointed out to me. Thank you. (Extra note: I didn't respond to the messages left on my talk page BECAUSE I didn't wish to cause the aforementioned conflict) EggRoll97 ( talk) 12:40, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi! This is super late but thanks for the welcome, much appreciated. I have a minor question on style/content - should most B/A/Good articles have at least one citation per paragraph? This is what I've been told, but articles like SDS-PAGE don't, especially in some of the more technical sections. originalmess how u doin that busta rhyme? 09:03, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi Greyjoy, thank you very much for the kind introduction. I do plan on staying with Wikipedia, and helping to make it better. I am very new at all of this; it is quite overwhelming to see the massive amount of information available. Reading these pages seem like a foreign language to me. I'm hoping to make as few mistakes as possible, and learn about editing. Once again, thank you so much! NDP11731 ( talk) 07:20, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Ok I Understood Piad'S Amt'R ( talk) 06:14, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
Thank you for the nice welcome message! Atasato ( talk) 20:11, 8 June 2018 (UTC) |
Hi Greyjoy
Thank you for your explanation. I have been authorized by Kavithalayaa to make edits to the Wikipedia page. I removed the history intentionally as it doesn't capture much about the history of company and merely highlights some derogatory aspects which are factually inconsistent.
I will be updating the history with a much broader outline to present the company facts more accurately.
Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mailmeg100 ( talk • contribs) 07:16, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Many thanks for your advice Greyjoy. I'm new on here and wasn't aware I couldn't use the name of the company I work for in my username. I have just submitted a username change as suggested. Folly Farm Official ( talk) 10:07, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
please read the whole article again it contains all the references to each statement within. I have also added te URL for reference. I will share the list of references again. Please check — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vinodup ( talk • contribs) 03:29, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi Greyjoy. Thank you for letting me know about the changes.Kindly note that a page [[ https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=AMRI_hospital_fire&redirect=no]] was created and a merger was done. This page was again created, and information was added in a new page. The same user has been making the changes on this.
Thanks for the help. Will do accordingly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vrnthmsn ( talk • contribs) 13:23, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
I would like to thank you for editing the Infobox of Bishop Labayen. On another note, the size of the Infobox returned to the default (I think). I would like it to be of the same size as other Infoboxes as you did. How can I do it? Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Br. John Rafael ( talk • contribs) 06:29, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi Greyjoy,
I made some changes to my wiki page today for personal privacy reasons. I'm experiencing great difficulty and upheaval in my personal life and needed to edit my page in order to deflect possible personal complications. With respect, please don't undo the changes that I have made. They were quite necessary and not in any way an attempt to denigrate or otherwise harm anyone Quite the opposite.
thank you, Barry Carl
(user name: Wellyn Dowd)
Wellyn dowd ( talk) 11:39, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
I saw the change to R. K. Narayan you made, but just before, an IP deleted content without explaining why. Just letting you know before I do the revert. TheConnorMan ( talk) 09:04, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello!
I appreciate your willingness to take time and educate me as a Wiki neophyte editor on the right way to add new page content. Please note your rejects of a link I tried to embed from another article was my very first attempt of that kind; and only the 2nd or 3rd for all time, as I use wikis to learn -not teach others about subjects. It just happened to be one very rare instance that got my attention and I happened to know the precise correct facts. No rule violation was intended and I hope any sanctions will be forgiven in view of my past record. TY again! CrissieLuckey ( talk) 18:37, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi Greyjoy,
I did misinterpret the "d" as divorce and not death, but I noticed that while you were answering my post and so I ended up with a conflict when I tried to change the question. His wife did NOT die in 2003. HE died in 2003, so they were married until "his death in 2003" and I think that should be made clear. Because the way it stands, it looks like SHE died in 2003. In fact, she is very much alive and going on talk shows to talk about the new movie about his life.
But I wasn't able to figure out how to edit my talk so that it would come out after your response. I am very new to the Wiki editing game.
Regards
Spiritruth Spiritruth ( talk) 06:40, 18 June 2018 (UTC) (Ruth Lym)
Dear Greyjoy,
I am R.Sharma from India. There is a very popular mobile invitation app in Indian Market with name Instaphone. While searching instaphone on google, wikipedia shows it as Pakistani mobile communication company which actually does not exit now. That Pakistani company has been shut down long back. In India people are getting wrong information about their popular product. I suppose there needs to have some corrections. Pls suggest.
Thanks' R.Sharma Lines4raj ( talk) 07:49, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Good evening! Help upload the photo in this article [1], I am the author of the photo. Thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Двигун ( talk • contribs) 18:19, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi Greyjoy!! I'm Ninette. I'm a bit new to wikipedia but I do not believe in providing unreliable informatuon on such a platform. I Myself is a person who believes wikipedia is a platform of reliable informational. Pls be patient enough to read this whole msg and kindly reply to me. I saw that his date of birth and age was wrongly given on wiki. It was given as 16th aug 1986 which is wrong. Now why I tell it is wrong is bcoz I own a magazine in which his interview came and in it his age was given as 26( as of 2015). So practically his age shud be 29 now. That is why I changed the yaer of birth from 1986 to 1988. If u want u can search for Neerav Bavlecha's interview to Marhrubhoomi Star n Style and u will find the e-mag. I hope u understand. Try googling for it. And I seriously don't know how to add a citation or a proof as such. It will be grately appreciated if u wud tell me how to so that i can put up a citation( or u can do it aftr u come to know the truth). Regards, Ninette Catherine Ninette Catherine ( talk) 12:10, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Actually I am new to this wiki platform and I don't know java languaging. And u can't read an e-version of the star n style mag bcoz for reading u have to buy it first. I wish I could send u a pic of the mag I have in hand so that u wud believe me...!! Ninette Catherine ( talk) 13:54, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
And I would like to know whether you removed the info abt his parents because of the same reason. I got the info from the same Mag 'Mathrubhoomi Star n style 2015'. And I would like to know why u did not delete his sister's name (Dimple Bavlecha) which was added by me.... Ninette Catherine ( talk) 15:17, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Oh...okay. But I would love to know from u one last thing. Why didn't you remove the year of birth in the first case ( i mean, before i changed it to 1988 it was 1986 on wiki). Well I just wanted all the people who use wiki to know that his age is 29 and not 31 and that his year of birth is not 1986 but 1988. As I saw a wrong info on wiki, I thought of changing it to the correct info according to the paperback magazine I own. Thank u for replying to me patiently..! Ninette Catherine ( talk) 06:59, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
HI Greyjoy - Sorry for any mistakes--I'm new at this. But I'm not sure why the page says it might be a fan page or something. I can't see what the specific problem is or how to fix it. Any advice very welcome.
Thank you
Areaman17 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Areaman17 ( talk • contribs) 01:08, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm trying to do a major edit/clean up of the Soap&Sin wikipedia page on behalf of the artist but I keep getting knocked back. Is there any advice you can give me that will enable the next time I try to update be successful ? thanks Wikwikwikiwiki ( talk) 09:11, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi, No, I haven't tried to edit Soap&Skin under any other names - that was most likely someone else in the team. We're not trying to promote anything - we're trying to get the facts out there. Is there a way we can do this? Thanks
I am new to Wikipedia and learning. I tried to make some edits to the Hector Camacho, Jr. article, but you (Greyjoy) said that they needed citations. Hector Camacho, Jr. asked me to help him with the edits since there are several personal items in the article that are not true. Am I allowed to do the edits as long as I have a proper citation? If not, who can? I have never done anything on Wikipedia prior to this. I am not connected with the usernames you mentioned (for example, Reviloneimak, SOLFO, Dark Goldenrod). Thank you. Chabela7 ( talk) 01:36, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
That anon has appeared about nine times so far and added a large amount of "references" to five articles. 44 refs were added to Drifting (motorsport). Many of the links don't seem to work. Jytdog summed it up on Nature therapy with horrible pop culture sites about history. no thanks The five articles have been PP and may need PP again. Cheers Jim1138 ( talk) 07:03, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
There is a disccussion going on at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Should the "In wrestling" section be removed from professional wrestling articles? regarding the section removal. LM2000 ( talk) 06:23, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi Greyjoy I noticed you undid my changes due to "conflict of interest". Any chance we can get those changes done? Morgan IS my source of information here, he asked me to put some information up to date. It is not our intention to do any advertising or giving false news.
I would really appreciate it if we could find a solution we both like. Thanks and regards, has_vier — Preceding unsigned comment added by Has vier ( talk • contribs) 12:05, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello Greyjoy!
Hope all is well. I created a draft 6 weeks ago and it has yet to be reviewed. Is there a way to expedite the process? Please advise.
Best, LaWr123 ( talk) 04:35, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
Okay, thanks for getting back to me!
Could I possibly have another reviewer review the page? Please advise.
Best, LaWr123 ( talk) 05:21, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
Okay. Thank you for your help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by LaWr123 ( talk • contribs) 05:29, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
You'd rather go with a fake article that reports lies because it follows Wiki's protocol than inquire and be a genius like I am. I never bought Nikolai's lies. Everything indiciates 100% croatian descent. HELLO? Ur article is garbage. Says his middle name is Nikolai, yet his obituary has his name as Josip H. Second his mother was Dragica Tomasevic, not Volkoff, another demonstratable lie. Also says his brother is Luka, when obituary only mentions brothers Tihomir and Ante. Luka may be a cousin. What else? Hes not the first one to make up lies about his background and u just buy it. Get out of here and go fix his article.
Hello, I am a little confused about the situation in Mamamoo. I've demonstrated that the recently added snippet is incorrect and in conflict even with the referenced source itself. According to the Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy, "All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be supported by an inline citation to a reliable, published source. Contentious material about living persons (or, in some cases, recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion.". Why is the default position to keep the newly added snippet pending discussion instead of the other way around?
You mentioned to "Wait for there to be a consensus reached on the article's talk page" – how exactly will this consensus be reached? If no one reacts to my concerns on the talk page, will the new demonstrably incorrect information stay up indefinitely?
Thank you.
Thank you for the quick response. Yes, there is a reference to a reliable published source included. However, the content of the referenced source does not match what is presented in the article, which results in the snippet itself being "unsourced or poorly sourced", besides other concerns. Maybe I am interpreting the policy wrongly. If so, I will be waiting for your response on the article's talk page. Thank you.
Thanks, you just saved me many extra tilde hits :) I may keep doing it tho, since someone once complained that I didn't. Occasionally it is easier to go with the flow than try to retrain people ... have a nice weekend (almost) ! 116.231.78.79 ( talk) 12:52, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi Greyjoy. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! ~ Amory ( u • t • c) 13:44, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Gg
Jezzy-lam ( talk) 03:26, 4 August 2018 (UTC) |
I am writing about https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Lampix&oldid=853852887 (owner being accused of fraudulent activities is no reason to delete an article). What is the correct approach? Should the article be left as is or edited in any way?
Thanks for upkeeping wikipedia!
The janitor man2: Thanks for the update!
Hi, thank you for verifying and just wanted to clarify. Both Meg Michaels (as Meg Jones) and Masasa Moyo provided voice work for Traci. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adamtimberlake ( talk • contribs) 06:19, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
As said previously: "relayed by MPAA", doesn't mean "provided by MPAA". The IGC (administration that manage the Parisian underground quarries) denied that this film has been shot on location. This fake information has only one purpose: promote the concerned movie. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.27.17.182 ( talk) 13:55, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
I'm afraid that it's against any logic. In a first time you have to prove a solid reference to add a content (not only a declaration from the one you promote), but not the contrary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.136.198.200 ( talk) 17:18, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
One again, this is the contrary. If you provide an official information proving that this film has really been shot in the catacombs of Paris, you may be able to add this content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.136.42.100 ( talk) 08:50, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
The "three sources" you mention are in reality only one: the declaration of the movie promoters. Please contact the IGC and see by yourself instead of repeating in circle the same non-valid argument. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.27.17.182 ( talk) 13:14, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
The fact that you did not want to verify the information yourself and to find your mistake does not justify considering a simple statement as a valid source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.90.20.12 ( talk) 15:19, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
In the same way Wikipedia is not there to promote film. And even less on the basis of false information. Instead, go to sites dedicated to the promotion of cinematographic works. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.136.85.178 ( talk) 07:09, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi Greyjoy, Thanks for your message about a Conflict of Interest. I take it all on board, but note that I am not paid, and am a representative of the NZLSA national executive. I made the changes to reinstate how the Wikipedia page had been before a student went and deleted large amounts of information, which we rely on as an organisation because it provides institutional knowledge and recognition about our alumni. The information provided (people's names) is purely factual and so not influenced by my position on the executive.
Cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jasperfawcettgriffiths ( talk • contribs) 06:06, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello, thanks for noticing my edits to certain jazz album articles. I have deleted some AllMusic reviews under the "Reception" section of the article. To me, the critical perspective from AllMusic seems one-sided and needs to be balanced with other views to represent the topic fairly. You pointed out fairly that AllMusic is a reliable source. However, having just one AllMusic review (on nearly all jazz pages!) doesn't seem to contribute usefully to the article and even appears a bit suspicious (promotion for AllMusic.com?) — Preceding unsigned comment added by AMendelssohn ( talk • contribs) 03:34, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for your response. Here's my concern: I read articles on jazz everyday and, in nearly every article, there is one AllMusic review, usually by the same critic. I suspect that AllMusic has edited all of these articles for the sake of promoting their brand. I appreciate your suggestion that I add more reliable references to offer a balanced perspective, but that wouldn't be an effective way to address this issue (since I couldn't research and edit such an enormous number of articles). If this is indeed brand promotion on a huge scale, what's the best way to deal with that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AMendelssohn ( talk • contribs) 03:55, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello !
Thanks for having updated the results table ! It's awesome. Could you do the same for the french page ? They just took the same table in English with the leaked results ! I tried to copy paste your new table into the French page but it doesn't work ! Thanks in advance if you can help me!
Bets regards
uenoeki54 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uenoeki54 ( talk • contribs) 07:05, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi there! You asked me why I made changes on this page /info/en/?search=Ning_(website) The reason is that I`m a representative of NING INTERACTIVE, and we made a decision to update our information, cause current facts seem to be outdated. Here, we want to add some new facts about NING features, when texts will be ready, some external links to relevant materials, and links to the related resources. We kindly ask you to return our information.Your sicnerely, Anastasiia. For more information, contact me at [email protected] Anastasiia1993 ( talk) 12:52, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Hi,
Austin Acoustic is my Registered Trademark for electronics. Please create another page for the football team and name it Austin Acoustic LFL.
Man Nguyen Austin Acoustic Austin Acoustic ( talk) 08:15, 11 October 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Austin Acoustic ( talk • contribs) 08:05, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
Can you please remove external links template because I’ve removed all external links for removing “issues” from my page! Can you please help me by previewing my page and tell me how to improve! It’d be kind enough! Thanks Shaheba Sultana ( talk) 08:30, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
This obituary seems (to me) to be a credible source for Turner's death, but you have way more Wikipedia experience than I. Zinnober9 ( talk) 06:52, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
As I said. Sources are easy to find. This is y'alls bag not mine CarrollSanders ( talk) 11:52, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
What you reverted contains false-news pages and a video from a website that is long gone and can't be retrieved even with webarchive. We're talking misinformation here. Misinformation, which only aims to ruin the image of the person. The edits have been discussed with the person who this page is about personally. Hkrware ( talk) 13:06, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi, what I tried to do -and did some mistakes- in the article is to leave the Forced_disappearance section outside the Former hypothesis section, cause the case is on investigation, and under the guise of Forced disappearance followed by death; If you can read spanish there is a detailed article about this on the spanish Wikipedia, made by more than 20 users with experience on this site; what user Cambalachero - who as I can see is banned to participate in many spanish Wikipedia articles included the one of Maldonado- is trying to do is to make it look as a closed case and Maldonado's death as an accident, erasing all media information about the investigation to show only the version of a group who openly operated to guilt the victim by publishing fake news, some of them in the article as Former hypothesis (¿?). There is some users on the Talk page remarking this, but this person as owned the article, I dont know if he is connected to the case or why. Regards! -- Agustin6 ( talk) 16:28, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
What are you referring to? In regard to changes you made to Bridge International Academies
Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by CicelyGH ( talk • contribs) 09:43, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi GreyJoy,
Could you please check the status of this wikipedia page as i have reverted it bacj to the original location?
Thanks, AI ---- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anonymousinventor ( talk • contribs) 13:01, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Greyjoy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vodkapoise :-) Nthep ( talk) 11:34, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
Seems you've removed links to spherical panoramas of Blue East Two that I made in Greenland. It was a virtual tour.
Why?
Eduard Maydanik ( talk) 14:49, 23 December 2018 (UTC)