![]() |
Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article Scooby Doo: Mystery of the Fun Park Phantom, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently-created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page. |
OK, I have to ask -- are you just obsessively updating all of the videogame articles, or are you intentionally trawling the list of things i've worked on and cleaning up my messes? (I don't mind at all if you are, I'm just curious). -- Nandesuka 16:05, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
Very well-written article and well-reasoned explanations on the Talk page. -- Habap 19:01, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
Since an anon just alleged a PC Games prejudice in the Game Designer article, I just wanted to weigh in here that the articles/edits I've seen from you have seemed well balanced. If you've had some bias I haven't noticed it, and you are obviously not defensive about others editing you. So please accept compliments for your balance and ignore the criticism on Talk:Game Designer. Coll7 01:16, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
May I ask why the second picture of Gary Gygax was "unsuitable for Wikipedia"? The man exemplies RPG gaming. The first picture is pointless without the second. I don't think all shots should have to be boring and drab, no? K.Nevelsteen 21:12, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
Dear Frecklefoot,
My name is M. van Veen and I am not a Wikipedia user with an account; only a guest who is able to post. And yes, it was my personal experience, in which I was fully conscious as you are now.
True, it is original in the sense that there is no reference to any reputable source or publication. My addition was intended to complement an article that has partly no proper conclusion other than the reputation of its sources, so partly no proper conclusion regarding to its contents.
The statement I gave (From the personal...the same time) was originally written in first person by myself, and later altered by someone else. During this experience I was an observer of what was happening, which automatically meant that I was in fact separated from this happening. That is all, not really different than the fact that you, when you read this, know that you are awake right now.
I just read the latest change in this article, made by someone who undoubtly is a fan of poetry, but perhaps does not have the means to cope with something that does not support his own personal ambitions. His reaction shows the lack of scientific ability to address this subject fully all too clearly, which is exactly my point in my apparently contoversial addition. The article of "Sleep paralysis" as a whole has many gaps that need to be resolved by 'science', and therefore cannot hold temporary statements in the form of valid conclusions, such as calling "awareness during sleep paralysis" a "disorder" by definition.
See for yourself what you do with my addition, it does not matter to me, it might matter to those who want to understand more about this subject without falling into the trap of accepting merely temporary conclusions that are based on unfinished business.
Regards, M. van Veen
And a personal sneer afterward! congratulations, Mr. Frecklefoot, or whoever you are you claim to be... What does it matter if I add or change my post, even if it is a 1000 times... Just because you have full support from Wiki, that does not mean you are morally justified as well... but of course, I am a troll and you are the gnome isn't it? Well, I am fed up with this political internet nonsense, so I urge you to delete my addition!
![]() |
Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article Foundation 9 Entertainment, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently-created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page. |
I noticed you revert on Dune II. Wasn't Dune 2000 a rewrite though, I think it was completely new code. Certainly the graphics engine was new. Multiplayer was new too. Not a straight port no? Jacoplane 21:51, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
Dear Frecklefoot,
I am writing to you regarding a link you removed from the plastic surgery site under Wikipedia. The link was to a plastic surgery discussion forum, which do not receive any form of funds from anyone and is therefore completly impartial. I understand that Wikipedia is not a link farm etc, however it might be relevant for people reading about plastic surgery to know that you have the possiblity to talk about issues that might concern you prior to an operation and share your experiences. I would be grateful the site could be added to your links or if you could advise how it might be possible to add it.
Many thanks for your help.
Kind Regards,
Thomas Sylvest [email protected]
Just thought I'd draw your attention to a Help desk query about your edit summary "whack-job" in the Sleep paralysis article. The question is here. -- Commander Keane 12:47, September 1, 2005 (UTC)
Please come see the template I created trying to balance everyone's comments; Template talk:DnDmodule Thanks for your suggestions Wendell 05:24, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
I just made a service plan page. Yeah, I work for CompUSA, so feel free to de-bias it, it's my first article. I made it to clarify the difference between those things electronics retailers spam you with and extended warranties, and there ARE actually some important differences. -- Riotgear
You reverted an addition of a fan site claiming linking to fan sites was against policy. However, Wikipedia:External_links#Maybe_OK_to_add states: "including a link to one major fansite is appropriate". What policy were you referring to? Thanks for being active in pruning external links though - it's a never ending and tiresome problem. JesseW, the juggling janitor 06:23, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
re: Billy Joel spam I noticed that you re-added a "spam" link in the Billy Joel article. I assume you did this without knowing that link—pianofanman.com—is a known spam link and should not be in the article. An anon user keeps adding it and we keep deleting it. Just FYI. If you see it deleted again in the future (which it most likely will be since the anon user is rather relentless), it shouldn't be re-added. Thanks. — Frecklefoot | Talk 15:34, September 9, 2005 (UTC)
Hi. What's a spam link. I went to the link and I don't recall it having any popups, if that's what you mean by spam link. I certainly won't add it back, but if you could explain the term it'd be helpful. Looked like quite a good site to me.
Best wishes, -- User:matt.whitby
Thank you for working on "Editing digital images." and for leaving me a message so I can talk to you. I am a newbie. You changed the name of my newly posted article "Editing digital images" to "Digital image editing". When I search "Editing images" a redirect comes up that points to: "Digital image editing". How can I avoid going to the redirect and instead go directly to: "Digital image editing"? Phil 19:15, September 12, 2005 (UTC)
I am curious as to why you removed the links in the section Internet Games "Examples" and denoted them as linkspam. They are all valid internal wiki references, why would they be considered spam when they redirect to (mostly) purposeful examples of browser based games? Everquest, Planetside and Runescape are mentioned in MMORPGs, so I don't see the difference in internet games. - Moocats 20:03, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
Hello Frecklefoot!
I want to congratulate you for your nice work inside Wikipedia and I'm sorry of adding a new link to the sims 2 section, I thought that I could add a sims 2 list of fansites. I don't think I will appear here again, so if you wanna contact, "webmaster (a) simsextremos.com" You may wanna delete this ;)
Your participation is requested at Talk:Game tester. Thank you. Adraeus 22:05, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
I see you have contributed to the Visual Basic article on Wikipedia. Any chance you would like to join in editing the wikibook: http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Programming:Visual_Basic_Classic? -- Kjwhitefoot 07:40, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
I noticed John Romero's picture has no source and may be up for deletion. Did he ever respond to your comment? Tfine80 00:10, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
Looks good to me, not too POV :) Turnstep 22:23, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
![]() |
Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article BudgeCo, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page. |