![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
You deleted a page I put up on myPartner. I put a request on the talk page asking what I needed to fix and/or change. Instead of getting a response, it was just deleted. I would still like some information, so I can make the page stick. Thanks! Blm0303 ( talk) 21:21, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the speedy response. I can see the original page now, but there is no talk page. Blm0303 ( talk) 21:29, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thanks so much for the semiprotection!Cholga talK! 20:37, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Regarding semi-protection can I suggest you look again at Manchester. In the four days between your removal of SP and its subsequent re-protection there were just two instances of vandalism amongst many other edits. As such, there is no valid reason for SP. Please see the SP policy at Wikipedia:Protection policy. Thanks. 82.20.28.142 ( talk) 23:53, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello there Rudget!
I came originally to ask you a question, but, I've since (and only just) realised you've left WP:GM... Why????? I understand you're busy in your admin role, and have had disagreements with Malleus, but they're no reasons to leave!
I found your membership to have been very enriching for the project. Won't you reconsider joining us again, even if it is just in spirit? I work closely with Malleus, and rate him as a premium editor, but still believe you are more that welcome to work with us as a unit! Of course it is your call and you may have your reasons.
My original question was regarding the archive bot on WT:GM - it appears to have stopped archiving! Just one good example as to why I believe you should still be around helping us. Seriously. -- Jza84 · ( talk) 01:23, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
You are a previous participant in the discussion at WP:AN/I about User:Mikkalai's vow of silence. This is to inform you, that I have made a proposal for resolution for the issue. I am informing all of the users who participated, so this is not an attempt to WP:CANVAS support for any particular position.
The proposal can be found at: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Proposed resolution (Mikkalai vow of silence) Jerry talk ¤ count/logs 01:49, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
I was wondering if you could do me a huge favor. My last RfA failed, and failed bad. I am getting ready for re-nomination later on in this month or next month. I was wondering if you could look over my contributions and tell me what I've been doing good and what I need to improve upon. Your assistance is greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance. Undeath ( talk) 05:22, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
I blocked five version of him myself this morning. The first was Pbuee ( talk · contribs) at about 9 am EST. He brought on a new account about once every 3 minutes for fifteen minutes. I posted them all for an IP block. Good times, though, huh? – Clockwork Soul 14:49, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the comment, you've made my day. :) αѕєηιηє t/ c 15:23, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the Barnstar! And yeah I am bored of And-Rew so I thought I would use my middle name, Joshua, which has already been taken so Joshii sound good lol └ and-rew┘┌ talk┐ 16:43, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Was page protection here really necessary? I only see one recent blatant vandal, and he's been blocked. jj137 (talk) 16:46, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
It worked great. I was just getting different admin's opinions, because my RfA won't have people who vote all the same way. Undeath ( talk) 16:51, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Your a wikipedia boss now, apparently :P The Daily Mail just to mention one ;) See yah around! Tiddly- Tom 20:32, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
You know, I looked over the rules and think that only one word was wrong. I said "for Minnesota" and could have said "on Minnesota". It was not my intention to only get support votes. Any sort of feedback would have helped and was begged for at 1, and 2 and on several talk pages as well as where you replied at 3 and in a peer review where there was zero feedback. Unfortunately there are articles with higher priority and maybe the portal really isn't something that many people knew about yet. In any case I mention this because of a situation of another editor who is working on a FAC. They were told today to raise the awareness of editors who may be informed on that given topic. So I believe except one word, there was nothing to worry about and and that the canvassing rule makes ample room for asking for attention. Hope this helps. - Susanlesch ( talk) 20:36, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi Rudget. You were the GA Reviewer for The Last Temptation of Krust. The recently closed FAC for The Last Temptation of Krust was closed with 2 comments and one "Support" after 2 weeks, and I'd like to start another FAC for it soon. Do you feel you could "Support" the article in its current status, if I started another FAC for it? Is there anything else that you think I should do first, to further improve the status of the article? Thanks again for the GA Review. Cirt ( talk) 20:51, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Thank you very much for giving your support to my admin application, which recently closed successfully (36/3/1). I hope I can continue to justify the confidence that you have placed in me. If there is any way that I can help out more, or if you have any handy tips for a freshly-hatched admin, please drop me a line. Thanks again. - 52 Pickup (deal) 21:36, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar | |
Here's a barnstar for improving Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! The Helpful One (Review) 22:03, 1 March 2008 (UTC) |
Ah, thanks for removing that. I knew I'd forgotten something. :) Glass Cobra 10:11, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Tks for looking out for me. I guess my warning really pissed that guy off. Makes you wonder what he's doing to the ones that blocked him ;-) How you been? — Rlevse • Talk • 14:25, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
I put my name down, iirc. But knowing my memory, I'm probably wrong. Yes, I would be absolutely delighted to go under ADCO with you. αѕєηιηє t/ c 14:30, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for educating; I did not understand the meaning of {{ hangon}}. I would not renominate while it is already nominated for deletion. Tangi-tamma ( talk) 14:39, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
I'm not planning on self nominating. Jimfbleak will probably re-nominate me too, but a co-nomination would be great too. :) Undeath ( talk) 16:50, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
The RFA you asked about is now active. — Rlevse • Talk • 17:28, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for responding to my request of speedy deletion of The mechanix redirect. I noticed that you deleted the talk page for The mechanix, where I had also placed a db-maintenance template (along with my explanation for the speedy delete of the redirect). The actual redirect still exists, however. This is my first request for speedy deletion, so I'm not sure how the process goes. Is a decision still pending? I put a db-maintenance template on the redirect page, but didn't want to break the redirect, so I put it underneath the #REDIRECT code. Consequently, it's not obvious; accessed normally, the page simply redirects. Was that not the proper way to place the template? Noca2plus ( talk) 22:13, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for putting on semi-protection. I have been working on this page for a few weeks now, and unfortunately I have had to spend more time on reverting vandalism than on article improvement. Feel free to leave the status as long as you want, as the article seems to be a vandal magnet. Historymike ( talk) 13:50, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi, this got respeedied before I had a chance to replace the article, per the {{ hangon}} I'd set. Could you restore article and talk page, please? Thanks, NapoliRoma ( talk) 18:21, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
That would be great. Proposing a candidate is not an excecise in ego-stroking, it should be with the idea of the best for the project, and more co-nominations just goes to show the community how well-thought-of and appropriate the candidate is, so please, if she approves, go right ahead. -- Avi ( talk) 19:16, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Thank-you for your support and the lovely comments :). Seraphim♥ Whipp 21:35, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
I may just take your advice there! I may have made big steps recently but others wont be able to see that unless I wait a while. Will contact you if I have any questions, thanks for the offer! -- Camaeron ( talk) 19:21, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
PS: 39S vs 16O; why did it fail anyway? -- Camaeron ( talk) 19:29, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Omg, hope I dont have to work it out myself. I hate maths! -- Camaeron ( talk) 19:33, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi Rudget ! I might need some help with my article ... There are differences between german and english Wiki Version - copy and paste is easy - to solve more complicated not. So i need some time ... and perhaps a litte help from your side. I am member of DanWessenForum its a community project to help each other with our colletibles ... Tom -- Dan Wesson ( talk) 18:20, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
looked at deletion log: 18:02, 4 March 2008 Rudget (Talk | contribs) deleted "Dan Wesson" (G12: Blatant copyright infringement)
Sorry made the mistake not to save after inserting hangon ... so ariticle was deleted while i was editing ...
i am a bit slow i know .... but i still have the page in my browser and try to finish now ... OK ?
uoops now it blocked .. pleses release it again - Thanks -- Tom 19:13, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Germans writing in english Wiki ... struggle struggle ...
Thanks a lot for helping me ! Tom -- Dan Wesson ( talk) 20:25, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
It needs a lot of work.
Corvus cornix
talk 19:49, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Good luck. :) Corvus cornix talk 19:51, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Germans writing in english Wiki ... struggle struggle ...
Thanks a lot for helping me ! -- Dan Wesson ( talk) 20:27, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
It got deleted? Corvus cornix talk 03:20, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
.. cry ... deleted once more while editing ... see my user talk ... thanks to Rudget i had a good base ... now i feel like Don Quixote -- Dan Wesson ( talk) 10:01, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
... working again at it ... @ Rudget you might have a look: [1]-- Dan Wesson ( talk) 12:59, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello Rudget !
Yours Tom -- Dan Wesson ( talk) 10:18, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
I don't know if you want to or not, but I'm probably going to have my RfA set up either tonight or tomorrow. I'm going to ask my previous nominator, Jimfbleak. If you would wish to co-nom, please do so. I could use all the help I can get. Thanks in advance. Undeath ( talk) 03:34, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
... at User:Asenine/AC. :) αѕєηιηє t/ c 14:15, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
First of all, your message hurt my delicate eyes. ;) As for your question, I haven't done anything in the last several weeks with my WikiProjects. Football is done, baseball hasn't started, haven't been gnoming, haven't been copyediting. But I did just block a n00b for posting a full body shot pic of his own naked and erect self on several userpages. (maybe that's why my eyes are burning and not your message)... Is that a WikiProject? Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 19:07, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
The Working Man's Barnstar | |
In recognition of your excellent set of contributions, all of which are so very useful in helping us all move Wikipedia forward, I award you this barnstar. Keep up the excellent work. :-) Lra drama 20:34, 5 March 2008 (UTC) |
Seconded! - Susanlesch ( talk) 21:09, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi. I saw this passed and happy to see it. I made one small copyedit to correct the total supports. - Susanlesch ( talk) 21:09, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
I'm glad you took the criticism of the image so well. ;-) And thanks for the prospective support if ever I do need it.. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 21:13, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
I think I might want this user name, to redirect to me... Thoughts? - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 21:18, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
You may get a complaint from user Asingleton-green ( talk · contribs) about the speedy deletion of his page Baird Jones which I tagged A7 and you deleted. Don't worry unless you do, but if you do, my discussion with him about it is here. Regards, JohnCD ( talk) 21:23, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Ow. Dloh cierekim 19:24, 6 March 2008 (UTC) UR welcome. no prob. Oh. When I said "Ow," I meant "how did I do that?" Cheers, Dloh cierekim 20:19, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Viz., User talk:Toast1966—mean anything? AGK ( contact) 21:29, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Hey Rudget!
Congratulations on finding the page that does not exist. Here is your reward; you've earned it.
User:Selfworm/HiddenLinkAward
Congrats!
selfworm
Talk) 04:18, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello Rudget. I see that you frequently nominate users for adminship. I was wondering if you could take some time and check out my contributions and such, and let me know what I would need to improve upon in order to work towards becoming an admin. Thanks alot! Grsz 11 06:28, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
I just saw that you namechecked me in your RFA nom of Seraphim Whipp [3] and felt I could not let such a lovely and generous comment go unacknowledged so here I am to say, well, thank you! and to let you know how deeply flattered I am to be referred to in those terms and in such a public way too. You have made my day. kindest regards, nancy (talk) 09:12, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
I wanted to personally thank you, Rudget, for your support in my recent RfB. I would have had grave doubts about your judgment, being that you supported me, until your decision to co-nom SW with me. That proves you have excellent taste, and just slipped up hitting "S" instead of "O" at my RfB
. I am also glad I ran in to you personally, and hope we can collaborate in the future. As for the RfB, I am thankful and appreciative that you feel that I am worthy of the trust the community requires of its bureaucrats, and I hope to continue to behave in a way that maintains your trust in me and my actions. I have heard the community's voice that they require more of a presence at RfA's of prospective bureaucrats, and I will do my best over the near future to demonstrate such a presence and allow the community to see my philosophy and practices in action. I hope I can continue to count on your support when I decide to once again undergo an RfB. If you have any suggestions, comments, or constructive criticisms, please let me know via talkpage or e-mail. Thank you again. --
Avi (
talk) 16:07, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Hey Rudget, thank you for the message on my talk. I apologize for not following the general unwritten rules of closing an RfA via the snow clause. I was attempting to be bold in doing so. I appreciate you coming to me civilly and professionally to let me know. A non-admin closure of an RfA wasn't something I planned on ever doing, but I shall endeavor to be extremely mindful in the future - although I don't really see myself doing it again for fear of stepping on toes :) Cheers mate. Wisdom89 ( T / C) 16:58, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the barnstar. Sunder land 06 18:03, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi! As somebody who commented on a January proposal to place all articles related to homeopathy on article probation, I would greatly appreciate your input on a new proposal to help combat disruption that would scrap the probation and implement discretionary sanctions. I apologize for any intrusion, but this is to my knowledge the first time sanctions of this nature have been attempted to be enforced by the community, so I feel that a wide range of opinions is necessary. Thank you in advance for any comments you may make. east718 ( talk) 18:59, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
(reinstalled after MiszaBot III cleanup)
Hello Rudget !
Yours Tom Dan Wesson talk -- Dan Wesson ( talk) 16:13, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Had a look ? Need advice Tom -- Dan Wesson ( talk) 17:16, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
. Thanks for advice ! Before clicking it, i still want to have some fine polishing to make it shiny :)
Any idea about portal question ? Tom -- Dan Wesson ( talk) 18:30, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
====> there are 103 featured portals, of a total of 548 portals
in german wiki we have specialist for weapons in wiki - most of the join the portal support -- Dan Wesson ( talk) 18:45, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Ok ! Thanks a lot for being such helpful and gentle to me - i really like ask for your help sometime again Tom --
Dan Wesson (
talk) 18:49, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
@ qualitystaff (forward?)
Qualitätsoffensive --
Dan Wesson (
talk) 21:38, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
.
Using my admin coaching method, are ya? Stealing my hard work, eh? Well cool, at least I know that I did a good job developing it. ;) Malinaccier ( talk) 22:30, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
The Greater Manchester WikiProject Newsletter | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sending one out of hope and courtesy! Hope you don't mind. -- Jza84 · ( talk) 02:26, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
I've been doing some new page patrolling and noticed this title come up again. I saw you deleted it because of copyvio but it has been recreated. Maybe you could check to see if it now complies, or has it just been recreated as it was? Mjroots ( talk) 11:04, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
I'm considering his unblock request ... the artist seems to be notable by one major-label release, and I've asked him to find and provide some reliable sources on his page. Do you have any comment? Daniel Case ( talk) 14:20, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks; good work! — TreasuryTag talk contribs 12:24, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
I see you decided to block this user ( Scottevans05 ( talk · contribs)) despite my concerns, the user was warned a lot previously so I accept the block. However, the edits were not persistent and obvious vandalism so I do question whether it was appropriate to report it to WP:AIV, and to be honest I am not sure that a indef block was necessary either. I will keep any eye out for any indication that the user wishes to learn lessons from the block, and take things from there. Camaron | Chris (talk) 12:39, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Hey Rudget! Nice job keeping the Project Report for the Signpost running! I've been gone for a while, and was worried it might not be continued...thanks much, and keep up the good work! Cheers, ( ar ky ) 18:22, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
I see that you are the writer for the WikiProject report in the Signpost. I'm wondering how you can apply your Wikiproject for the segment for a future issue. The Chronic 05:12, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
I've answered three of the questions. Would you mind adding that we also have a Featured Topic to the introduction? It's a pretty big accomplishment, in my opinion. Thanks. Nikki 311 23:21, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
You have quitted, while leaving the MEDCAB page full of indirect talk about your recess and about individuals - rather than about the article, so I opened a new MEDCAB case. By the way, after I opened the new page - the old page was closed by Addhoc. Eliko ( talk) 19:16, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:ED_Railway_Sign.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 17:44, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Why thank you! As you know, my RfB passed successfully with (133/4/3). And that means I pretty much own the universe now! And you're partly to blame.... But in all seriousness, thanks for your unswerving support and dodgy questions, I appreciate them both in equal measure! The Rambling Man ( talk) 21:48, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
What happened to WP:FPORT page colour? OhanaUnited Talk page 18:39, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
For the cleaning up the vandalism on my talk page! Xdenizen ( talk) 12:16, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello, my page Jeygopi Panisilvam was deleted because it was an unsourced biography of a living person. Actually, Panisilvam died in the 40s. Could you please restore the page? Thanks, JPAnis ( talk) 12:29, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi Rudget. The book JPAnis offered as a source doesn't seem to exist, according to Amazon and Google Books, and Calcutta Press doesn't seem to exist either, except as a simple printer. Furthermore, the article itself is very silly - apparently he was killed in 1948, but became tribal leader in 1956, after the tribe had been dissolved in 1947. Looking at the page history, I suspect that this is a class of schoolkids playing games with each other. Could you consider whether this can be speedied as a blatent hoax/vandalism, or failing that unprotect/reduce to semiprotection so I can nominate it for deletion? Cheers, Iain99 Balderdash and piffle 13:43, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello Rudget,
Just a note that I have started an editor review process for myself with purposes of getting feedback on where I can improve upon my usership. I may use it in any admin nomination way down the line. I don't expect you to participate (I understand that third parties should be involved here), but wanted to let you know I'm being pro-active about this. -- Jza84 · ( talk) 13:29, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
[5] Date changed per request. Enjoy your relaxation time! - Revolving Bugbear 14:35, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Is it still open? I'd like to make a request for Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones. Just reply if possible. Mitch 32 contribs 11:11, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
I don't know what to do about this guy. At first glance he appeared to be a typical vandalism only account: [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] but then I looked further and saw he had some positive, if minor, contribs: [12] [13] [14]. I don't get how someone's done as much vandalism as he has without a block, but on the other hand it seems odd that he does good work mixed with vandalism and ignores all the warnings. :/ Any idea what to do? -- Naerii · plz create stuff 14:31, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Delete and salt, please. This is this article's 6th reincaration. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 18:38, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
I saw that you protected User talk:Oh wiki your so fine your so fine you blow my mind because “ user and sockpuppet are vandalising page”. Would you mind sharing some of those edits? Both the vandalism and the sockpuppet edits would be helpful. — Knowledge Seeker দ 19:00, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
I would like to request Cheapshot's Sucka Breaks be un-deleted. It's a notable release, by a notable group, and it was put up for deletion by User:Cosprings, who has been vandalising pages associated with Styles of Beyond. I've had to revert multiple things he's done, along witht he fact he's hosting illegal torrents on his page. Jay ( talk) 19:20, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
76.250.184.110 is back again and adding imeem links to the article. Would you mind blocking? Thanks. -- Naerii · plz create stuff 20:34, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your support. - J Greb ( talk) 22:50, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
The G3 speedy tag I placed on the article covers blatant hoaxes. This article is most definitely a blatant hoax. There is no reason why the article should survive a speedy it does not deserve to survive merely because there is an AfD in progress. DarkAudit ( talk) 00:04, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
My other account was User:Titlebaumnow, but I lost the password. You deleted Dick's Cabaret, stating that the article did not indicate importance/significance. The article indicated that "In March 2008, the club was placed in the national spotlight when it was revealed that David Hernandez, a singer and current finalist on the seventh season of American Idol, worked at the club in 2004." That seems like importance/significance. Please restore the article. Thanks! -- Fredgremlint. —Preceding comment was added at 04:53, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Very much for the AWB thing. You may be surprised to know that it's not the first time I've been confused for a bot. Thanks again.-- ÐeadΣyeДrrow ( Talk | Contribs) 10:44, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Oh it's something I look back on very fondly. Especially since it's the first actual message I ever received from someone (third section down). It actually started at AN/I. I Didn't even know what AN/I was at the time. -- ÐeadΣyeДrrow ( Talk | Contribs) 11:12, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Yea, those were the good ole days, when fighting vandalism was more personal. Recent Changes in one tab, the list of warning templates in the another. I made my first thousand or so vandal fighting edits that way. Kids these days have it too easy. -- ÐeadΣyeДrrow ( Talk | Contribs) 11:21, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
Dear Rudget, thank you for taking part in
my RfB. As you may know, it was
not passed by bureaucrats. |
I did it now. So in effect, my company just paid me to do this :o) Your co-nom is awaited. Will you tell DEA when you've finished so DEA can transclude it and restart the clock etc? ➨ REDVEЯS is a satellite and will be set alight 12:26, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks, Jimfbleak ( talk) 13:17, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the reply, I'll look into it. Solestin ( talk) 14:43, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
It's gonna help me how exactly? TheBlazikenMaster ( talk) 16:23, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Your comment in the deletion log seems to suggest that you deleted it because an author requested its deletion. I (and others) also had contributed to the article and I want it restored. Its surprising that you didnt think it fit to ask the editor to take it to AfD if he wanted it deleted. The article which User:Knowledge Hegemony had authored had problems of {{ tone}}, undue and {{ POV}} and I'd painstakingly worked on fixing it. I was working my way through the article and was more or less done with the lead. Please restore the article and ask the editor to take it to AfD instead. Thanks. Sarvagnya 18:34, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Jimfbleak is going to be nominating me for RfA soon. (It says he did already, but it's a link to my old RfA.) When he does that, would you mind being a co-nom? It would be very helpful. Thanks. Undeath ( talk) 21:37, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi Rudget, I'd like to request a WikiProject report on Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games. If you're interested in doing one, please reply on WT:VG. Cheers, JACO PLANE • 2008-03-13 23:13
Thank you so much for your support in my RfA, which was successful with a final count of 70/1/1! ... discospinster talk 23:17, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Rudget :)! Thank-you for the wonderful comments.
|
LOL. I think I'm one step behind you. I thought I was reverting that IP's vandalism and adding messages to the talk page. Then I go back to the article and see that I actually didn't revert it, but you did, but my warning still went through. Go figure. I was only checking their other edits, I'm not following you, I swear... :) Jauerback dude?/ dude. 13:30, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
"...where me and a few other administrators close cases..." Hmm... "me" → "I"?? (and no, I'm not a grammar freak ;))-- PeaceNT ( talk) 15:09, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi Rudget, thanks for supporting my RfA, which passed with 42 supports, 0 opposes, and 0 neutrals. I'm pleased that the Wikipedia community has trusted me with the mop and I take it very seriously. Of course, special thanks goes to my nominator, Kakofonous. I also appreciate the congratulations. Cheers! Toddst1 ( talk) 15:24, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi, sorry about the unintentional copyvio. Am currently splitting the portmanteau page that was at Resilience. I guess isolating the network section in a new page brought it to the bot's attention. Anyway, I've changed the copy. Please drop me a note if I should do anything else. -- AndrewHowse ( talk) 16:46, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
My apologies for the delay I've been busy and gone for a few days. Thanks for participating in the RfA, you did bring up some valid points which I'm keeping in mind going forward. No hard feelings and I'm always open to comments about my admin work. Sincerely – Zedla ( talk) 02:16, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello, and thanks for your support in my recent RFA! The final result was 61/0/3, so I've been issued the mop! I'm extremely grateful for your confidence in me and will strive to live up to it. Thanks again! — Scott5114 ↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 07:13, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi Rudget, I'd like to request a WikiProject report on Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games. If you're interested in doing one, please reply on WT:VG. Cheers, JACO PLANE • 2008-03-13 23:13
Unfortunately, I've already got next week's slot booked for the Tropical Cyclones Project. Does the 24th sound alright? Rudget . 11:17, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the block on this one, but shouldn't the Crazed Hits link also be deleted. Please see my comment on the discussion page. -- Richhoncho ( talk) 21:41, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for restoring February 2008 attacks on North Indians in Maharashtra. Can you also restore its talk page, which may have some useful discussion. Cheers. Abecedare ( talk) 02:51, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello Rudget, I would like to respond to the allegation that Isabel de Pablo is a sock puppet and the reason you gave for deleting the STARS Methodology page. First I wish to clearly state that I only have one account and I use my real name. If you check the IP addresses you will see that I live in Switzerland. Secondly Isabel de Pablo is a real person living in Spain (again please check IP addresses) who is a user of the methodology and wrote the page. She approached me to write about STARS and naturally I am pleased she did this. She is not (and never has been) an agent or paid by me in any way. She used openly available information, including my web site GNU Free Document License pages, and articles published in the American Society for Quality magazine, which they independently verify and edit to ensure accuracy. The ASQ have trust that STARS is a serious methodology and I believe the publication by ASQ meets Wikipedia's requirements for proper reference sources. I would therefore politely support Isabel's request that the page be reinstated, and welcome your help. Hanvanloon ( talk) 14:32, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
...so, a month in, and I'm starting to look to stretch my horizons a bit. I'm fine on blocking and unblocking of all varieties, protection, reviewing blocks, deletion and restoration, and have dipped my foot into WP:SSP as there seems to be a constant backlog. Any suggestions where I could look to move into next? GB T/ C 16:32, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Yup, I'm still up for it. Unfortunately I am buried in tons of coursework at the moment so it will have to wait a few days. I hope you understand. :) αѕєηιηє t/ c 17:00, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Just out of interest but why did you withdraw your vote at the rfa of geni? -- Camaeron ( talk) 17:08, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Ok ; p -- Camaeron ( talk) 18:10, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Loving the box at the top of your user page (that Contributions, Userboxes, Awards and Other bit, incase you've no idea what im on about). It keeps everything very neat, how did you make it? -- Camaeron ( talk) 18:59, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
I actually meant the one on his userpage! -- Camaeron ( talk) 18:14, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Why did you delete the article for copyright violation when that had been at least edited out of the current version? Now it can just go back up and have to go through an AfD again, rather than establishing notability or not, quickly, this time. In addition this encourages editors to simply leave copyvios sitting up on Wikipedia, because they'll eventually be deleted.... This is irresponsible. The copyright violation should have been edited into the history, as I did, then administratively removed, and the AfD continued. Wikipedia does not take problems seriously, like copyright violations, and inaccuracies, so they keep occurring. It's tiresome seeing Wikipedia articles appear at the top of search engine results, articles that are inaccurate, copyright violations, worthless. Editors and administrators need to take this seriously and be responsible. I can predict your "'outraged Wikipedian' than 'anybody' would speak to" you response, so no need to. -- 69.226.108.255 ( talk) 21:16, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
|
Thanks for the support |
Thanks for your support on my request for adminship, which passed 92/2/2. Heh, I wasn't sure where to post my thanks, but here works. I'll be sure to learn the ways of the mop, and I'll live up to the expectations of the community. ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk) 03:58, 18 March 2008 (UTC) |
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 13:39, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your response. Is there anything I can do to stop this constant deletion/recreation by these multiple admins? Its really getting out of hand.
Thanks Succisa75 ( talk) 18:17, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi, ma page was a description of the company CAB. It was not a SPAM or a COI, i readed wiki articles about that. I did exactly the same as ZEBRA for exemple : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zebra_Technologies Could i know the reason ? thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ludovic19 ( talk • contribs) 17:24, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Please read more here: User_talk:Nightscream#Deletion_avoidance. ScienceApologist ( talk) 17:37, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
User:21655#There's still a chance Two One Six Five Five τ ʃ 18:02, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Hahaha, yeah I just happened to catch it on the watchlist each time, lol, and here's your own funny header :P « Gonzo fan2007 ( talk ♦ contribs) 18:10, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Don't worry I created my own wierd but wonderful navigation! Thanks anyway though and Keep up the good work in the Rfa department ; ) -- Camaeron ( talk) 18:33, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Thank you so much for your kind comment and award. I will transfer it to My awards page, I have been so looking forward to one of these! Thanks!! -- Camaeron ( talk) 18:51, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
With all due respect, I STRONGLY suggest that you reconsider your decision to decline my protection request on Todd Schnitt, MJ Morning Show, and Bubba the Love Sponge. If you were to review the edit histories in closer detail, you will noticed that - particularly on the Todd Schnitt article - there is an established pattern of IP vandalism. Reviewing those edits, it is apparent that the edits are coming from listeners of Bubba the Love Sponge, as it has appeared to be his personal goal since returning to terrestrial radio to make MJ's life "a living hell." He frequently talks about MJ on the air and the lawsuit that was filed today is likely to result in not only his on-air discussions of MJ increasing, but also an increase in his fans hitting all of the articles involved and "cheerleading."
Respectfully, -- InDeBiz1 ( talk) 18:45, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
hi, Today I created my first page, which you just seem to have deleted due a blatant copyright infringement.. I noticed that the bot had found a webpage with the same text as the newly created page, so I followed the 'what to do now' and stated in the 'talk page' on the newly created page that there was no copyright infringment because the site in question borrowed this text from the original source (which I mentionned)..
hmm this sounds confusing.. so I created a page about a 'Who's Who' with the text that accompagnies the online version, but another website also has used this original text and now the bot suggested that I took the text from this third website, but in fact it is the other way, so this isn't a blatant copyright infringement imo, so can this page be restored ?
18:18, 18 March 2008 Rudget (Talk | contribs) deleted "Talk:Who is Who in African Art" (CSD G8 - talk page of a deleted page)
18:18, 18 March 2008 Rudget (Talk | contribs) deleted "Who is Who in African Art" (G12: Blatant copyright infringement: http://www.buyafricanantiques.com/whoiswho.htm)
--
Bruno.Claessens (
talk) 21:35, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Albany1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Polly ( Parrot) 22:05, 18 March 2008 (UTC) -- Polly ( Parrot) 22:05, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Intercontinental Hotelcorp Logo.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly ( Parrot) 22:06, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
With all due respect, I fail to see what is "incorrect" about my changes, so please do tell me.
So yes, please tell me exactly what I have changed that is "incorrect". I appreciate your improvements to this article which are for the most part constructive and highly beneficial, but you have to realise - admin or not - that good articles come from constructive collaboration rather than reverting changes at a whim because you don't like them or because they deviate from previous standards even if those standards might be questionable and could be open to constructive debate. Otherwise you could be be accused of bloody-mindedness, which I am sure is not the case.
I am now going to revert your reversion in the hope that instead you'll raise your points for public debate in the appropriate article or wikiproject discussion pages, so as to reach a more reasoned consensus and hopefully also bring other opinions and interest into this article.
-- Fursday 20:25, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Can you tell me if I was right to investigate and follow up on [15] this edit made by ShieldDane? I don't want to spark the whole situation off again! Igniateff ( talk) 11:22, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
I noticed that you deleted this article do to copyright infringement however the information contained on the article was not subject to copyright laws and is available as free information from the government. If you check the reference that was on the article it will lead you to a United States Army website. Please restore this article at your earliest convenience.-- Kumioko ( talk) 17:51, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello. Are you aware that the bot updates the talk page and adds the featured portal star? Gimmetrow 16:35, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
What is the IE you stated on the FPOC page? Ultra! 17:08, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks again; I fear I may have to come back soon. As I said on the page's talk, it's been a lovely three months with semi, then yesterday it all started again!! And as the new series starts in a fortnight, people are more anxious to add rubbish than ever... I'm afraid you'll have to expect me coming asking for reprotection :-( — TreasuryTag— t— c 17:16, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
...is requesting a review of their block from you in particular. Thought I'd let you know. GB T/ C 06:42, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the rollback granting — wow, you're fast! Good Ol’factory (talk) 12:51, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello again, I did not see any response on whether you consider the American Society for Quality to be a reliable source that meets the requirement for NPOV. Could you please advise? -- Hanvanloon ( talk) 19:41, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
I know, sorry about that. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 16:09, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you!
Thank you for your support in my RFA. The final vote count was (73/3/1), so I am now an administrator. Please let me know if at any stage you need help, or if you have comments on how I am doing as an admin. Have a nice day! :) Aleta Sing 18:13, 22 March 2008 (UTC) |
Could you please explain the problem with username User:Hanvanloon? I understand in general the reasons for a username block but I don't see the specific problem in this case. The block log explains a COI regarding the STARS methodology but I don't understand how a COI relates to a username problem. In any event the user has chosen a new name and has requested an unblock. Thanks. Sbowers3 ( talk) 18:52, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
Get into IRC, plz. FYI, I'm in ##RudgetKnight. Maxim (talk) 14:27, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
The WikiCup has begun, best wishes for the tournament. |
STORMTRACKER 94 Go Irish! 22:33, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you!
Thank you for your support in my RFA. The final vote count was (73/3/1), so I am now an administrator. Please let me know if at any stage you need help, or if you have comments on how I am doing as an admin. Have a nice day! :) Aleta Sing 18:13, 22 March 2008 (UTC) |
Could you please explain the problem with username User:Hanvanloon? I understand in general the reasons for a username block but I don't see the specific problem in this case. The block log explains a COI regarding the STARS methodology but I don't understand how a COI relates to a username problem. In any event the user has chosen a new name and has requested an unblock. Thanks. Sbowers3 ( talk) 18:52, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
Get into IRC, plz. FYI, I'm in ##RudgetKnight. Maxim (talk) 14:27, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the rollback. I was wondering why I clicked on diff and it reverted the edit. But then I checked and you gave me rollback. So you were going to give me it before?-- RyRy5 talk 16:32, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
A small token for giving me, RyRy5, the rollback feature when my request was only up for 10 minutes and for already considering me to have rollback. Thanks alot!-- RyRy5 talk 16:41, 23 March 2008 (UTC) |
Your very welcome. The rollback can be very useful to me in my RC patrol. I already made 2200+ edits in only 1 month and 3 days. Now, that can really improve. Thanks again.-- RyRy5 talk 16:52, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for trying to protect this article-- since the redirect, what are you going to do? (Don't want to bollox the article history because of a zealous newbie that's already been blocked once. Cheers -- Yamara ✉
Hey man, nobody told me you were back. I know it's a bit late, but welcome back! -- Shark face 217 00:25, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Could you do me a big favour by finishing off the table, then I'll go through and add the citation sheet links and fill in the blanks in the lead. It might be ready for FLC tomorrow. I'm on IRC (# Wikipedia-en) if you need to speak. Thanks, Qst ( talk) 22:22, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Fattiesshoulddie ( talk · contribs) is now Monkeyballs200 ( talk · contribs). Track IP? - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 16:21, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for protecting {{ Great Offices of State}}. However, Electrobe's edit is still in place and needs to be reverted. Also, the {{ pp-dispute}} is visible on pages it's attached to. Thanks. -- Philip Stevens ( talk) 17:17, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
I ask that you unblock User: Hanvanloon on the basis of WP:BITE and WP:AGF. He has made useful contributions to several articles in the Quality management area, which apparently is his specialty. As a beginner, he has made mistakes but I've been working to teach him our way of doing things. I think the right way to handle him is with careful explanations, then possibly warnings, if necessary escalating blocks. Starting out with an indef block without any user talk page warnings, and without first trying short blocks, seems excessive. I'm confused, and he no doubt was confused, by "username" as the block reason. That apparently is not the reason, COI is the real reason. But COI is not a prohibition and not a reason for an indef block. Sbowers3 ( talk) 18:14, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Thank you so much for Semi-Protecting the GTA IV article! :´) I was about to have a breakdown! Emil Kastberg ( talk) 20:06, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
I started this once before. Not sure if I'm ready to dig in (e.g. find diffs, etc.) to try to promote myself in that way again. But it would certainly be easier for vandal-fighting. Any thoughts would be appreciated. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 14:06, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
αѕєηιηє
t/
c has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
I did Stage 3! :) αѕєηιηє t/ c 06:41, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Nice work here! Looks great! I hadn't noticed you'd been expanding the page. Looks like a new forthcoming GA from you??? -- Jza84 | Talk 14:30, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
I noticed you were in the process of adding your view to Malleus Fatuarum's Request for Comment, but decided to withdraw. Please feel free to add your view to the RfC. Any contribution to this process is welcome. — scetoaux ( T/ C) 14:58, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Sorry you withdrew the WP:FPORTC. I think the recommendations brought up in the discussion will help the portal and make it better in the long run - let me know if you would like any help working on it between now and the next FPORTC discussion. Cirt ( talk) 20:11, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Can we reduce it down to semi? All of the accounts were created today. - Rjd0060 ( talk) 15:47, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi Rudget! If you don't remember me from before, you gave me rollback rights. I was just wondering if you liked baseball. Do you?-- RyRy5 talk 17:58, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello Rudget,
I just wondered if you felt that I ought to seek some kind of early-stage formal mediation or other kind of input regarding User:Dmcm2008, a contributor whom I've had a content dispute with which ended in a consensus in my favour (for want of a better phrase). I've tried to bring the best out of this user during and since our dispute but have continued to face some, well, "challenging" conduct from him.
I'm not asking from intervention (or input) from yourself (or anyone else), but I'm mindful that I think I've exhausted most recommendations made by the various policies and guidelines such as outlining that I have the article's best interests at heart, suggesting a compromise, and requesting third opinions. I have no interests in making things unpleasant for Dmcm2008 but I am alarmed by recent comment from him that attest he is unlikely to amend our relationship.
I think the various threads at User_talk:Dmcm2008 (complimented by User_talk:Jza84#Whiston) coupled with his contributions give the best portrayal of where we're both upto. Do you have any thoughts/suggestions on where I ought to take this? I'm coming to you specifically as someone who is a) an entrusted and respected administrator and b) someone with more experience than myself with this kind of thing. A response is not mandatory (of course) but most welcomed! -- Jza84 | Talk 18:08, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
:) Spebi ( talk) 05:03, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I noticed that you were the one that blocked MJD86 ( talk · contribs) for sockpuppetry. I believe another sock has popped up: TodayIAmAClown ( talk · contribs), who added the same thing to an article that previous MJD socks tried to add. -- Scorpion 0422 18:52, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for granting my request at WP:RFR. And even more thanks for the speed at which it was granted :) Excirial ( Talk, Contribs) 12:12, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
regarding your message to me. I am not trying to 'edit war', forgive me I do not know others 'edit war' with me. As whenever I seem to edit for the purpose of enhancing an article or correcting something, as in Falkner Square, I am challenged by either Jza84 or Kitchen Knife. Jza84 is very experienced when it comes to telling you the WP rules and I am fed up with this; I had tried to be a good editor --- a new learning editor ---- but I find these two want to challenge the majority of my edits. As one backs the other up it is also perceived that I am outnumbered. Personal attacks on Jza84 are because the user needs to stop being so silly with his action. I have to argue with an outside of Liverpool over areas I have 'knowledge on' when I am not able to provide a reference. It means when I see something as wrong or put something I believe is correct, based on my knowledge, these two users work against me. No matter what I say I am being 'bullied' for want of a better word. Which I will leave these two users to do their bullying to someone else, I have no interest..I will keep an eye on WP articles but there is no point getting too involved with those two around. Dmcm2008 ( talk) 13:18, 28 March 2008 (UTC) I had tried to work on wikipedia but got harrassed by those two editors at different times. I worked on the Vauxhall,Liverpool article from almost scratch, and got praise and help from Snowy. Sadly other edits I made had been targeted by the above. As all I wanted to do was expand or correct items-but Jza84 in particluar reverted them and began to sprout WP rules. That is his way not mine, I only wanted to do simple edits he took it too far particularly my judgement on Liverpools suburbs--AS did KK. Dmcm2008 ( talk) 14:10, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
You've set up your Werdnabot to archive within 24 hours, so perhaps you missed my last comment, but I was wondering how to proceed with the WikiProject report. Are there some standard questions I can put to the WikiProject? JACO PLANE • 2008-03-16 23:01
Import my monobook and you'll see three tabs at the top of most pages - "di/b" empties a page or category of its images, "di/t" traverses through image categories at high speed, and "dp/b" will delete all pages linked from the page you're visiting. east.718 at 19:43, March 17, 2008
Hi Rudget, I haven't got time right now to work on the report, but I've pointed WT:VG to the preliminary report page. If you want some feedback on the questions you used, please ask there: all people who are involved in the project monitor that page and most people there know each other well. I'll be able to take some time to respond to your questions after tomorrow, I'm currently celebrating Easter with my family, so I have little time for Wikipedia! Take care, JACO PLANE • 2008-03-23 20:07
Hi Rudget. I wanted to find out why Atlanta is semi-protected. I saw that it had been badly vandalized yesterday by Dirkastan, but he's since been blocked. Is something else going on? The reason I'm asking is that it's currently a GA nominee, and semi-protection status could raise concerns during the review. Thanks, Majoreditor ( talk) 18:55, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for semi-protecting this page. You noted: "If it returns after the one month is finished, I'd advise asking for indefinite protection." I have requested this in the past (always denied). I'm quite sure it will be vandalized again after one month, and I will certainly request indefinite semi-protection when that happens. Thanks again. – Scartol • Tok 19:21, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Just wanted to say thanks for helping stem the tide by semi-protecting the OSx86 article, so... thanks! – ɜɿøɾɪɹℲ ( тɐʟк • ¢ʘи†ʀ¡βs ) 20:10, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Hey, I was wondering if you can take a look at Transportation in Taiwan and find where the page has gone? It looks like it was deleted after being moved around a few times. Ta. ┌ Joshii┐└ chat┘ 10:33, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi, may I ask why you blocked username "RecreationalTherapy"? Thanks. (I'll watch your talk page.) Dan Beale-Cocks 15:02, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi Rudget, I can trust you as an admin :) I'm asking your opinion. Do you think it's OK what I am doing here. I feel I'm doing fine, it's helping out (I feel) and its saving admins time. But I just wanted your thought on it. I also created a template for this use, non-admin commenting, its Template:AIV comment. Do you think thats OK? I also want to help out at WP:RFPP, you think thats possible. And I'm not an admin. If I was, I'd be blocking/protecting myself, but I'm just a lowly rollbacker. Steve Crossin (talk to me) 15:21, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
...is awesome! I highly respect editors who can steal things from other editors and shamelessly post a notice on their userpage =P ! Happy editing, Malinaccier ( talk) 15:44, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Does not exist? *wonders why* :) Anthøny 12:04, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
-- Crazy_Anne ( Eh..eh..eh) 13:47, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Since you have become involved in the editing dispute at Jewish lobby, would you like to be added to Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Jewish lobby? -- John Nagle ( talk) 16:28, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Hello! I'm here to inform you that the Tzatziki Squad has begun a new collaboration, history of timekeeping devices. The goal for the article is Featured status. Please pitch in as much or as little as you can, we appreciate your help! Keilana| Parlez ici 21:12, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Why don't you make it redirect to the talk page? weburiedoursecrets inthegarden 21:15, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
FYI: Update to Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Hanvanloon. -- DanielPenfield ( talk) 22:38, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Caulde/Archive March 2008! Thank you for your
support in my RfA (87/3/3).
|