This user may have left Wikipedia. LeoNomis has not edited Wikipedia since January 17, 2009. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome!

Hello, LeoNomis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  gren グレン ^? 15:18, 12 January 2006 (UTC) reply

I see you working on Islamic articles—an area where I also hang around. Enjoy your stay and if you have any questions ask. gren グレン ^? 15:18, 12 January 2015(UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Switzerland100francs1996.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 05:58, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Switzerland200francs1996.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 01:42, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

I've added the "{{ prod}}" template to the article Shukran, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Importance). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Shukran. If you remove the {{ dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. deeptrivia ( talk) 00:11, 2 July 2006 (UTC) reply

Why are you creating all of these pages with just Template:Wi? The purpose of this template is to stop the creation of dictionary definitions, not to newly create empty pages which no one has ever and likely will never make a dictdef for. — Centrx→ talk • 04:31, 6 July 2006 (UTC) reply

I'm just going over Wikipedia:List of encyclopedia topics, but some topics don't make for much of an article, such as vamoose. Rather than leaving the default empty page, using {{wi}} points the user to what little information there is on the article, and serves as a modest base, should there ever be some new information to expand the subject with. At any rate, as you've been around longer, I trust your judgement, so what would you do if you came across "vamoose" as a red link, either in an article or in a list of missing articles? Maybe you can help me find a better solution. -- LeoNomis 08:53, 6 July 2006 (UTC) reply

I don't know how Wikipedia:List of encyclopedia topics was generated, but it contains many items that are not "encyclopedia topics", such as its many dictionary words. If, in a proper article, I find a redlink: If it is a common merely functional word, rather than an encyclopedic subject, then I would unlink it. If it is an encyclopedic subject, the redlink actually serves to indicate to editors that there is some gap. Example: If I, the reader, know about "foo" and I read an article that has the blue link "foo", I may not click on it because I already know about foo. If I see a redlink, however, I may click on it to create an article with that information. If I, the reader, do not know about foo, then seeing a redlink I know I will not find information about it there. With a blue link, I click on it and find that there is actually no encyclopedic information about. Readers mostly expect to find encyclopedic information in links. Another thing, for example with respect to Vamoose: The only real article that links to that page actually is referring to a band with that name. Aside from a reader thinking there is already at least a minimal article on the band, a naive user may click on it and be confronted with a message that mainly tells them not to create an article there, when they may otherwise have created an article about the band.

It may be a good idea to do what Britannica, for example, does: the reader can double-click on any word in an article there and up comes the dictionary definition. This is a major change though that affects all of Wikipedia. Likewise, something could be added to the no-article-found message, informing the user that they could try looking at Wiktionary. This, again, could be a more effective, more uniform solution. The logical result of adding this template or creating redirects for every dictionary word and capitalization variants of various terms is hundreds of thousands of mostly unused pages. What is done instead is that redirects and the dictionary template are used only where it has come up with a problem. Some pages get new articles created with dictionary definitions all the time and then are deleted all the time. Some spelling variations and errors are very common and warrant a redirect. This is not the case for every conceivable word and every conceivable spelling or capitalization variation.

The disambiguation pages and the other introductory pages you are creating are great. Even if there is no real harm done with the redirects and the dictdefs, it is probably more productive to do something else. — Centrx→ talk • 09:23, 6 July 2006 (UTC) reply

I see what you mean about people thinking that an article already exists because it's blue. I'll be more careful when creating dicdefs (if at all), by checking what links to it exactly. Likely I'll use {{wiktionary}} from now on, along with a stub/disambig on what else the article could be. -- LeoNomis 14:29, 6 July 2006 (UTC) reply

When creating a new article, even if it is short or a disambiguation page, it is probably better not to mark it as minor. While it is appropriate to mark new redirects as minor, these others are real pages created from scratch and it would be better for more people to see them, as "minor" will hide the edit depending on a user's preferences. — Centrx→ talk • 09:27, 6 July 2006 (UTC) reply

I mark my edits as minor by default because they're usually rather small, but I'll try being more objective. -- LeoNomis 14:29, 6 July 2006 (UTC) reply

I have proposed the deletion for an article that was originally created by you on the grounds of it being a generally unhelpful and unencyclopedic reference; a better one is available at history of computing hardware and I believe "first computer" and "first generation computer" should redirect to this article instead. If you would like to contest the proposed deletion, please see here. Robert K S 09:23, 20 August 2006 (UTC) reply

Along the lines of many "wiki-specialists" who are sucking up articles and making them disappear: If you can't say in: 1-, 2-, or 3- paragraphs on a page,-(the original article, then ==See To==: to "History") ...instead of "Eating-up-and-making-disappear" an article. ....then I am speechless. This goes on a list of List of articles or categories in wikipedia absorbed by default. Pick a different title for this, but I see this as quite a fault. And there used to be some discussion of the "First Generation Computers", and I, Me, I don't get to evaluate it unless I can somehow retrieve it through a Log. Other people don't see the loss because they don't know there was an actual Article. Too bad for them.

Like I say unless you've made it abundantly apparent in the "History of the Computer", no one would ever know (that there was once an article, and that it doesn't deserve to exist). And obviously the "First Generation Computer" is now a veerrryyyy small part of the "history of the computer". I am being defensive about this because I have seen this in relation to things that I.. have personally done (and attemted to correct), or in things about things I have done, (which has now destroyed an original article). Obvious merges, and redirects, are out there. I suspect that this was not one of them. (I prematurely made a shirwreck article that was merged (a spelling mistake of mine), but a better article emerged (not mine)). from the ArizonaDeserts... -- Mmcannis 17:21, 22 December 2006 (UTC) reply

And I am not going to read the "History of the Computer", but I would have read the First generation computer..... SonoranDesertMan... -- Mmcannis 17:21, 22 December 2006 (UTC) reply

I've added the "{{ prod}}" template to the article W. Adrian Loader, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:W. Adrian Loader. If you remove the {{ dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Pascal.Tesson 19:34, 25 August 2006 (UTC) reply

I, too, had noticed the "Deer Bush" reference and thought that it was Deer brush. I am displeased with some wiki-types (not your article on "First generation computer"), who suck up other articles. I expect to see more of it. People go out to a website and read, and basically cannot know what they are really reading, unless they already have a "pyramid"-base-of-knowledge related to it.

I recently(in the past year) had made some Notes to Saltation. It has now developed into twin articles. and (sic) i affected the In situ article rather dramatically. It was basically a one paragraph article when I first found it, and I was doing Egyptian hieroglyphs and Cuneiform-(plus about 30 Amarna letters and the Rosetta Stone, Decree of Canopus-soon to be merged ?) so the history of Items-Found was often "In-situ". Anyhow, got to your talk page because Purshia tridentata is now on my, quite extensive watch list. Take care, (and make even some short cogent articles, if a redirect is in doubt. If you can figure out the correct category, It will be attendend to within days or weeks, maybe by a "pseudo-expert"(like Me, ha,ha).. from the ArizonaDeserts -- Mmcannis 17:38, 22 December 2006 (UTC) reply

Hi LeoNomis,

I noticed you recently created the article about Arthur Rudolf Hantzsch. I just wanted to let you know that you can announce any new Germany-related articles at Portal:Germany/New article announcements and Portal:Germany/New articles. That way other users interested in the topic can see them and might improve them.

You may also be interested in the WikiProject Germany.

Thanks,

-- Carabinieri

I've restored the full text for the time being, as the new Elaenia article has no context or references, and no genus author in the taxobox. I don't mind fleshing it out if you don't want to, but I'm very busy, so it won't be for a few days. jimfbleak 17:04, 16 January 2007 (UTC) reply

Hello! We are a group of editors working to improve the quality of France related articles. You look like someone who might be interested in joining us in the France WikiProject and so I thought I'd drop you a line and invite you! We'd love to have you in our project :-) STTW (talk) 18:34, 16 January 2007 (UTC) reply

I think it might be better to add the information on Gemmail to the Stained glass article, mostly because I do not think that there is enough on the subject to expand it (mostly because the Gemmail article on the French Wikipedia hasn't expanded since its creation) :: mikm t 18:53, 21 January 2007 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Grimmiales, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{ hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Wodup 05:51, 9 February 2007 (UTC) reply

I have added a "{{ prod}}" template to the article AAPE, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also " What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fram 09:58, 29 March 2007 (UTC) reply

	Chicago Collaboration of the Week
In the past you have edited AT&T Corporate Center. This week it has been selected as the WikiProject Chicago Collaboration of the week. Each week a Chicago related article in need of attention is selected as the Chicago COTW. Feel free to come help us improve it towards the quality level of a Wikipedia featured article. Your input in future selections would also be appreciated. See the To Do List to suggest a change or to see an open tasks list.
	Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago

TonyTheTiger ( talk/ cont/ bio) 15:46, 7 April 2007 (UTC) reply

I have added a "{{ prod}}" template to the article AANA, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also " What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. RogueNinja _talk 02:59, 25 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Switzerland100francs1996.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:00, 14 May 2007 (UTC) reply

A "{{ prod}}" template has been added to the article Bishop Herber College, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but yours may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also " What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 172.136.4.96 12:08, 2 June 2007 (UTC) reply

I notice you've been using {{ CoorHeader}}, which redirects to {{ Coor title dms}}. You might like to use the new {{ coord}}, which offers additional functionality, such as user-choice of display format, and a geo microformat. I've applied it on RSPB Old Moor Wetland Centre so you can see what I mean. Andy Mabbett 09:45, 5 June 2007 (UTC) reply

Please leave a note in the edit summary box when you add co-ordinates to an article and remove the template from the talk page. Otherwise it looks like vandalism! [1] You can set your preferences so that you will be reminded if forget to leave an edit summary. Thanks. Tyrenius 15:29, 5 June 2007 (UTC) reply

Hello, LeoNomis. Just a note to thank you for adding the coordinates to the theatre articles. I have no idea how to do it, and it seems like a really nice feature! Best regards, -- Ssilvers 20:10, 5 June 2007 (UTC) reply

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, LeoNomis! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule facebook\.com\/.+, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guidelines for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 07:10, 6 June 2007 (UTC) reply

I came across the article Abubus and think that the person is not sufficiently notable to the the subject of an article. I note that you created the article so I am asking whether you would object to its deletion. Perhaps the text could be moved to List of minor Biblical figures? - Fayenatic london (talk) 13:26, 27 June 2007 (UTC) reply

I'm new to Wikipedia, so I don't understand why a page that I wrote requires 'Wikifying'. I looked at the info on Wikifying, and as far as I can see, it's not messy (ie it's correctly formatted) and it has lots of links (both internal and external).

Please can you advise me on what I need to do to Wikify the page?

User:Fionamcgowan

• Hello! I agree that your article is well formatted, but there are a few things that are off. For example, articles don't usually start with section headers (in this case, the "== Early life ==" part). Also, certain words would usually be linked, such as (in the first phrase) "Belgrade, Serbia", and "Croatian". Also, the birth date should be complete and in parentheses next to the name. Personally, I think these are minor issues, but it's for the sake of matching the general style that Wikipedia articles have. Do you see what I mean? -- LeoNomis 14:35, 7 September 2007 (UTC) reply

Hi there - thanks for your response: that's very helpful advice for any articles I write in the future. I have made the amends that you suggested on this page. Does this now mean that the page can be 'Wikified'?

Kind regards,

User:Fionamcgowan —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 11:16, 19 September 2007 (UTC) reply

• It's looking good! Personally, even though the article has been more wikified, I would leave the tag, as there are a number of people who work through the huge backlog and will make sure everything is fixed up. -- LeoNomis 00:22, 26 September 2007 (UTC) reply

Has this been changed due to the fair use policy? I prefered the old one. Bevo74 15:55, 10 September 2007 (UTC) reply

• Yes, it seems the old icon was removed due to fair use policy. I agree that the current icon is rather standard, but if you'd like, you can change it to one of a public domain photo of a place in Nottinghamshire, similar to what has been done in {{ Wiltshire-geo-stub}}. -- LeoNomis 04:45, 11 September 2007 (UTC) reply

The guy you tagged recently converted to Orthodoxy - and I don't know the Stub-Tag for that. -- Ludvikus 10:34, 7 October 2007 (UTC) reply

• I don't think there's a tag for Orthodox clergy specifically, maybe use {{ Orthodoxy-stub}} followed by {{ Reli-bio-stub}}? That's all I found at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Stub_types. -- LeoNomis 16:05, 7 October 2007 (UTC) reply

I noticed you made a couple of edits to Ultimate Pricechecker.

I've proposed it for deletion. I noticed that the original creator is not active (that was his only contribution). If you disagree with this deletion propsal, let me know and I will open an AfD discussion for it.

Cheers! - Che Nuevara 22:03, 13 October 2007 (UTC) reply

• I don't mind at all. Thanks for asking though! -- LeoNomis 22:26, 16 October 2007 (UTC) reply

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Animal feeds, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Animal feeds is a redirect to a non-existent page ( CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Animal feeds, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 07:30, 25 October 2007 (UTC) reply

A Proposed Deletion template has been added to the article Joshua Anson Ballard, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also " What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{ db-author}} to the top of the page. The very model of a minor general 11:08, 31 October 2007 (UTC) reply

Hi, I noticed that you often make too insignificant changes [2] [3] [4]. Please don't forget what WP:AWB#Rules of use says about that. Cheers. MaxSem^{( Han shot first!)} 22:23, 13 November 2007 (UTC) reply

• Thanks for telling me, I was actually wondering whether some of the autoedits I've been making are too simple. I'll try to avoid that. -- LeoNomis 22:28, 13 November 2007 (UTC) reply

What's your definition of a stub, if Greg Mulholland is one? PamD ( talk) 07:17, 17 November 2007 (UTC) reply

• Well, I didn't add the tag to Greg's article, just moved it for formatting purposes along with changing the placeholder image. I leave the tag removal to editors who know more about this kind of article. -- LeoNomis ( talk) 12:18, 17 November 2007 (UTC) reply

Sorry, didn't notice that - I misread it that you'd added the tag! PamD ( talk) 23:01, 18 November 2007 (UTC) reply

An editor has nominated Eesa, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also " What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eesa and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 16:59, 16 February 2008 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on TAXI (advertising agency), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justin Eiler ( talk) 23:46, 9 March 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:LeShop Migros-Shop Logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 12:13, 10 March 2008 (UTC) reply

An article that you have been involved in editing, Sirat al-Mustaqim, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sirat al-Mustaqim. Thank you. Ultra! 15:23, 25 March 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Final Fantasy Mystic Knights.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 12:12, 8 April 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:FF sprite chemist.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 12:12, 8 April 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Mimet-f.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 12:12, 8 April 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Bartz Blue Mage.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 12:12, 8 April 2008 (UTC) reply

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Al-Maqasid, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also " What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{ dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? β^_command 16:56, 30 April 2008 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Prince of the Demon World and the Red Moon.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 05:35, 10 September 2008 (UTC) reply

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Data compression symmetry, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

no indication of notability and, without references, how does one know if this exists?

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also " What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{ dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Boston ( talk) 06:30, 12 February 2009 (UTC) reply

The article TACCS has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Seemingly unimportant disambig page. Nothing links here and the page consists of all red links.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{ dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{ dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. clpo13_{( talk)} 18:06, 24 August 2009 (UTC) reply

The article Parasite software has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable in itself, this is covered on the spyware and malware articles

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{ dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{ dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ysangkok ( talk) 17:43, 16 November 2009 (UTC) reply

I have nominated Karel apek (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. — the Man in Question (in question) 07:26, 10 January 2010 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Anonymity application requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Koolabsol ( talk) 14:25, 16 March 2010 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Anonymity application requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{ hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Koolabsol ( talk) 12:03, 17 March 2010 (UTC) reply

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dead-end articles. Since you had some involvement with the Dead-end articles redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). ╟─ Treasury Tag► UK EYES ONLY─╢ 08:07, 18 June 2010 (UTC) reply

The article Chrome 2 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

1. notability of software (over 3 years since article creation, still no reference or sign of release)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Widefox ( talk) 18:10, 15 November 2010 (UTC) reply

The article Islah (concept) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The corresponding Dab contains the only encyclopedia-worthy content this article has seen in its more than six years' existence. If its prose content can be expanded beyond a dictdef, it's high time to do so.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jerzy• t 05:18, 15 December 2011 (UTC) Timestamp: 20111215044412 reply

Thanks for uploading File:Switzerland200francs1996.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{ helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot ( talk) 05:47, 18 December 2011 (UTC) reply

The article Charles Logan (artist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:Notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kelly Marie 0812 ( talk) 16:37, 21 October 2012 (UTC) reply

Dear LeoNomis, You created the page Program logic that redirects to Logic programming. This redirect does not make much sense to me: program logics are logics for reasoning about programs, and logic programming is a particular way of programming using logic, so these two topics are really unrelated. Therefore, it would seem best to just delete the Program logic page? Thanks, Bart Jacobs (Leuven) ( talk) 15:46, 8 March 2013 (UTC) reply

The article TAXI (advertising agency) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Content consists entirely of advertising or a trade directory listing. There is no clear indication why this is notable beyond various self-congratulatory listings in narrowly-targeted, industry-specific publications. Wikipedia is not a yellow page directory and not a suitable venue to promote a business. The solely laudatory tone is a violation of requirements for neutrality and it is unclear why any of what's here is of interest to anyone outside this one narrow industry.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. K7L ( talk) 16:23, 30 August 2013 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article TAXI (advertising agency) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TAXI (advertising agency) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K7L ( talk) 03:47, 2 September 2013 (UTC) reply

See my note on the article's "Talk" page. ( Wasat (Islamic term))-- Akhooha ( talk) 23:37, 28 November 2013 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article File grooming is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/File grooming until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. QVVERTYVS ( hm?) 18:14, 23 December 2013 (UTC) reply

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Aphrodisia. Since you had some involvement with the Aphrodisia redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Chris Troutman ( talk) 07:15, 10 June 2014 (UTC) reply

The article ATTRIB has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article does not establish its notability by showing significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject itself. No prejudice against merging a summary into File attribute, although a summary already exists there.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Codename Lisa ( talk) 03:20, 29 August 2014 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ATTRIB is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ATTRIB until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Codename Lisa ( talk) 04:03, 6 September 2014 (UTC) reply

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Afro-Asian Bloc. Since you had some involvement with the Afro-Asian Bloc redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Mr. Guye ( talk) 23:06, 11 February 2015 (UTC) reply

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bats in the belfry. Since you had some involvement with the Bats in the belfry redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Mr. Guye ( talk) 23:56, 7 April 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Kek requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Berek ( talk) 23:59, 13 January 2016 (UTC) reply

The article Sajda has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no notability shown

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Len TheWhite Cat 12:32, 18 April 2016 (UTC) reply

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Short Metre. Since you had some involvement with the Short Metre redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Thryduulf ( talk) 11:49, 22 July 2016 (UTC) reply

The article Aperto (supermarket) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced for more than nine years and not edited in the last three. There is no claim to notability, so could probably be dealt with under A7 speedy deletion.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AtHomeIn神戸 ( talk) 06:20, 7 September 2016 (UTC) reply

Hi, I'm Slatersteven. LeoNomis, thanks for creating Hukm!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This needs a lot of Work, Unsourced, possible WP:OR.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Slatersteven ( talk) 19:34, 24 November 2017 (UTC) reply

Hello LeoNomis,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Hukm for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, Ahkam.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Slatersteven ( talk) 19:35, 24 November 2017 (UTC) reply

The article Operations Systems Modification of Intelligent Network Elements has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Context does not elucidate whether this is a product or a method or process, thus I am unsure if WP:NPRODUCT applies. A source search indicates that this doesn't meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SITH (talk) 15:33, 9 March 2019 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on Rapture index requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MrOllie ( talk) 03:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Ancient game. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 15#Ancient game until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TheAwesome Hwyh 20:29, 15 May 2020 (UTC) reply

The article Warraq has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

See Talk:Warraq (disambiguation)#Requested move 28 September 2020 for discussion that will require deletion of this page if the move request is granted.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. P.I. Ellsworth   ed.  ^put'r there 04:54, 29 September 2020 (UTC) reply

The article Sean McIntosh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable racer.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 ( talk) 23:43, 17 June 2021 (UTC) reply

The article Alamin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

dictionary definition WP:NOTDIC

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. rsjaffe talk 23:39, 24 August 2021 (UTC) reply

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Photosensitization and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 14#Photosensitization until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 ( talk) 10:11, 14 January 2022 (UTC) reply

The article Canonical account has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced since 2007; essentially just a dictionary definition

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra ( talk) 18:37, 29 October 2022 (UTC) reply