This username matched "Used i instead of l attempting to skip filter: M[Il]LF. Violating string: fllm100001mllf" on
the blacklist. --
DQB (
owner /
report) 20:00, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Note on file See
MILF, abbreviation for Mother/Mature I'd Like to Fuck --
DQB (
owner /
report) 20:00, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
This username matched "Promotional? 2" on
the blacklist. --
DQB (
owner /
report) 19:20, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Note on file Usernames containing this string are often promotional in nature - check if this is the case --
DQB (
owner /
report) 19:20, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
I don't think this is a violation of policy. The promotional userpage certainly was, but if this is someone's stage name (as opposed to the name of an organisation) there's nothing in policy to prohibit them from posting here under a matching username. Obviously, they would have to adhere to the COI guidance...
GirthSummit (blether) 14:06, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the
archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: Disruptive editing on the title of Shivaji, without discussing it on the talk page. Frequent edit warring and suspecting meatpuppetry.
Imperial[AFCND] 10:44, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
The article has been under indefinite semi-protection for about five years now. It does not appear to me that going to ECP would make much of a difference as many contributors already have that user right. The only thing I could imagine doing that could force more talk page discussion would be imposing 1RR. Would you be amenable to that? (I have put a long-overdue CTOPS notice on the talk page).
Daniel Case (
talk) 20:33, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
I don't have a strong opinion, but looking at edits from the last 2 weeks, 3 out of 8 users involved in the dispute over titles are not EC so ECP probably would improve the situation over the long run. I suspect that even if EC editors reach consensus, the title dispute will continue. Perhaps full protection for a week or two followed by indefinite ECP?
Daniel Quinlan (
talk) 22:26, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi, Nableezy Deletes every time the paragraph that Amnesty claimed that Israel imprisoned a Palestinian writer while he was a terrorist who murdered and kidnapped an Israeli soldier. He supports violence according to his profile so he doesn't want (or can) understand why this is a problem.
84.110.218.178 (
talk) 08:23, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Let's not forget - this is a page about *criticism of Amnesty*, and the paragraph is about Israel. So why he deleted it?
84.110.218.178 (
talk) 08:29, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Not done for now. This is too heavy handed to invoke
WP:PIAWP:ECR, even for
related content protection with an expiration. Last PIA edit was Nov 2023, and seeing as this IP editor has now been told about the
WP:XC tenure requirement for that
WP:CTOP area, that incident is probably done. If this page experiences another PIA-related issue by a non-tenured user in 2024, feel free to relist.
El_C 11:33, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent
disruptive editing – BS legal threats and continued posturing from an IP account (presumably the subject of this AFD).
Bgsu98(Talk) 04:03, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
Requests to downgrade
full protection to
template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{
Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Check the
archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: It was protected for none reason, I wanted to submit the draft because it seems that it is ready to be an article, but it was protected "indefinitely" and I don't have an account on Wikipedia.
190.21.184.81 (
talk) 08:24, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Not unprotected – It was protected for a reason: a long string of disruptive edits from IPs geolocating to Santiago de Chile, just like yours.
Favonian (
talk) 08:58, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
I didn't "vandalise" Wikipedia, I only added information, but another users disagreed with what I added.
190.21.184.81 (
talk) 10:18, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{
Edit protected}}, {{
Edit template-protected}}, {{
Edit extended-protected}}, or {{
Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Protected by
Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"
Protected by
Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"