This user supports ITALY Forza Azzurri!!

Hello, 14 novembre, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.

• Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
• Check out some of these pages:
  • Contributing to Wikipedia
  • Introduction to Wikipedia
  • How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
  • The five pillars of Wikipedia | Cheatsheet of WikiCode

• If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy ( talk) 14:01, 29 November 2023 (UTC) reply

thank you very much 14 novembre ( talk) 19:15, 29 November 2023 (UTC) leave me alone reply

Mynameisapple ( talk) 22:38, 27 March 2024 (UTC) thanks reply

==References==
{{Reflist}}

Thanks for your contributions to Italy v North Macedonia (2022 FIFA World Cup Qualification). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 19:54, 29 November 2023 (UTC) reply

@ SunDawn Thank you, I have added a reliable source. I think it now may be publish, but I might be wrong.

Kind regards 14 novembre ( talk) 15:23, 30 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hey man im josh was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Italy v North Macedonia (2022 FIFA World Cup Qualification) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hey man im josh ( talk) 16:16, 30 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello, 14 novembre! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hey man im josh ( talk) 16:16, 30 November 2023 (UTC) reply

I've deleted your message since it's on the wrong noticeboard. ANI is for chronic behavioural problems. In the future, such general questions are best asked at the teahouse (which I see has been linked above).

To answer your question, you are free to edit the English Wikipedia regardless of block status on other languages' Wipedias. Sincerely, Novo Tape (She/Her) ^{My Talk Page} 18:50, 4 December 2023 (UTC) reply

@ Novo Tape I would also like let you know that I have multiple accounts. However, I declare I will never use the ones currently active for any means. So, if possible, I would like them to be blocked all.

Thank you and kind regards 14 novembre ( talk) 19:18, 4 December 2023 (UTC) reply

In that case, you can try picking an administrator from Category:Wikipedia administrators willing to consider placing self-requested blocks and asking them. Many sysops will not block for accounts with few edits, but you can try to find one. However, there's a strong chance none will be willing to block your accounts. I'd recommend just linking your old accounts on your userpage, such as by using these userboxes. Sincerely, Novo Tape (She/Her) ^{My Talk Page} 19:27, 4 December 2023 (UTC) reply

@ Novo Tape Can I use this one:

This user previously used another account:  Username.

even if my previous accounts are in theory active? 14 novembre ( talk) 19:30, 4 December 2023 (UTC) reply

There are no hard and fast rules, but it may be a bit misleading if you're still editing from them, so if you intend to edit from them, I'd recommend using Template:User alternative account name (as I do on my user page). Sincerely, Novo Tape (She/Her) ^{My Talk Page} 19:32, 4 December 2023 (UTC) reply

@ Novo Tape Thank you for the answer. However, I do not intend to edit anymore from these accounts, even if it they are not blocked. Kind regards 14 novembre ( talk) 19:35, 4 December 2023 (UTC) reply

In that case, feel free to use the userbox you linked. Sincerely, Novo Tape (She/Her) ^{My Talk Page} 19:35, 4 December 2023 (UTC) reply

@ Novo Tape Fine, thank you 14 novembre ( talk) 19:36, 4 December 2023 (UTC) reply

You're welcome! Have a nice day. Sincerely, Novo Tape (She/Her) ^{My Talk Page} 19:36, 4 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Italy v North Macedonia (2022 FIFA World Cup Qualification) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~WikiOriginal-9~ ( talk) 02:11, 5 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your contributions to Il cielo è azzurro sopra Berlino. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Schminnte ^{[ talk to me} 17:33, 7 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marco Civoli and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic ( talk) 17:37, 7 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your contributions to Colpo grosso a Berlino. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. AntiDionysius ( talk) 19:28, 13 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. FMSky ( talk) 12:00, 29 December 2023 (UTC) reply

Hello,
Concerning your block on it.wiki, I noticed that you created later accounts in order to evade the initial block. This is against the rules on most wikis ( Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry, it:Wikipedia:Utenze multiple), and blocks should be appealed on your main account rather than evaded by using different accounts, which only worsens your case and makes a later unblock unlikely. ChaotıċEnby( t · c) 16:07, 6 January 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Chaotic Enby Thank you very much for having analysed the situation and for your reply. You are right. However, in the beginning I thought that it had been a mistake. How could I have appealed the block on the main account. And anyway, I know SP guide lines, but the first block was in my opinion complete nonsense and I asked Administrators explanations but I received no satisfactory answer. I would like to know what I can do. Kind regards, 14 novembre ( talk) 16:14, 6 January 2024 (UTC) reply

14 novembre, you'll have to log in to your initial account (the first one blocked) on it.wp, and explain why the initial block was incorrect. If itwiki admins have already explained to you the rationale for the block, you'll have to accept that it was correct, and request an unblock by promising not to repeat whatever it was that caused the first block. You will also have to commit to using a single account from now on.

Since Italian Wikipedia has no Arbitration Committee, if you are not able to convince administrators there, you will not be able to be unblocked. However, wikipedia admins of any project tend to look kindly on a history of constructive contributions to other Wikimedia projects, so if you can undertake to build up such a history of constructive contributions for six months or a year, with no socking on the Italian Wikipedia, a subsequent unblock request may be granted. Good luck. Folly Mox ( talk) 16:48, 6 January 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Folly Mox Thank you very much for your reply. I could not ask It-wiki Administrators logging in with the first account since it was totally blocked; I did it unlogged but they did not unblock me. So I think at the current state of things there is nothing to be done. However, I shall take into account your advice and stop creating sockpuppets while contributing constructively with the English Wikipedia. Maybe in future, as you said, if I build up a history of constructive contributions, Italian Wikipedia Administrators could reconsider my request. Excuse me if my English was not correct, thanks again for the reply and kind regards, 14 novembre ( talk) 18:51, 6 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Your English is very good, looking forwards to a history of constructive contributions here! Happy editing, ChaotıċEnby( t · c) 14:30, 7 January 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Chaotic Enby Thank you so much. Happy editing to you, and kind regards, 14 novembre ( talk) 16:44, 7 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Colpo grosso a Berlino and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic ( talk) 19:46, 16 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Il cielo è azzurro sopra Berlino and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic ( talk) 19:52, 16 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Informazioni date qua su en.wiki che, come ti abbiamo già detto su it.wiki, non ti servono a nulla perché i meccanismi che ha en.wiki su it.wiki non ci sono: solo una perdita di tempo; e non capisco nemmeno perché Meridiana ti abbia suggerito di leggere queste cose che ti creano solo inutili confusioni e soprattutto inutili illusioni. Anche se it.wiki avesse un ArbCom (e al momento non ce l'ha e non è nemmeno obbligata ad averlo), con il tuo comportamento hai già dimostrato di non essere in grado di rispettare nemmeno le regole più semplici e basilari: ti era stato dato un blocco non infinito, bastava aspettare e stare buoni poche settimane, invece di crearsi sock a raffica aumentando di volta in volta i tempi del blocco (mossa non esattamente furba). Anche se ti rivolgi a en.wiki, non ha giurisdizione su it.wiki quindi ti risponderebbero comunque picche, senza contare che in ogni caso un appello a un ArbCom non è affatto garanzia assoluta di sblocco. Anzi. Ricordati che l'unico responsabile di questa situazione non è l'admin che ti ha bloccato, ma tu col tuo comportamento. Superspritz ( talk) 20:09, 16 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Preciso che, a parte un isolate blocco di due ore, prima dellinfinito non avevo avuto blocchi. Grazie @ Superspritz 14 novembre ( talk) 20:15, 16 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the notification. Cheers. Atlante ( talk) 17:49, 22 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks for having corrected. Cheers 14 novembre ( talk) 20:40, 22 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks. Atlante ( talk) 21:40, 28 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi. I assume the vandalism in the it.wiki page on Akram Afif was later fixed. Thanks for the notification, btw. Atlante ( talk) 15:00, 11 February 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Atlante Yes. Kind regards 14 novembre ( talk) 17:52, 11 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi 14 novembre, I have procedurally removed the PROD on World Football Elo Ratings as that article has been the subject of a previous deletion discussion. See WP:PROD for how and when to use PRODs. You are still able to nominate the article for deletion if you believe there are valid reasons for its deletion. Best, Ravendrop 19:57, 3 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Ok 14 novembre ( talk) 21:07, 3 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello, 14 novembre. I saw that you moved some Supercoppa Italiana articles to different years, and in one move you noted "As agreed with talk consensus" in the edit summary. Could you please point me to where the talk consensus is located? I did not see it at Talk:2024 Supercoppa Italiana, Talk:2024 Supercoppa Italiana final, or Talk:2022-23 Supercoppa Italiana. I am not necessarily opposed to the moves, as the year used is a bit confusing, and there seem to be different year conventions between the Supercoppa Itialiana and the Supercopa de España, and it can be confusing; but as it stands, the current consensus you refer to is also confusing (at least to me). If we can link to the talk page consensus, that would help people for the future.
Thank you, 2pou ( talk) 20:07, 3 February 2024 (UTC) reply

@ 2pou It was discussed in WP:FOOTBALL. If the Supercopa de Espana is also confusing, we may change also that one. Kind regards 14 novembre ( talk) 21:08, 3 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at 2006 FIFA World Cup final. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I really don't think this has enough substance to justify a standalone article, and notability is also at best borderline (very borderline). I suggest merging it into the article on the 2006 final.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Il cielo è azzurro sopra Berlino and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing ( talk) 17:16, 9 February 2024 (UTC) reply

@ DoubleGrazing Done. You can now delete the draft. Kind regards 14 novembre ( talk) 17:19, 9 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Please do not make any unproductive or incomplete or inaccurate comments at the Teahouse. If you are not able to provide an accurate and informative answer, then say nothing and move on. Cullen328 ( talk) 18:29, 9 February 2024 (UTC) reply

I'm sorry 14 novembre ( talk) 18:53, 9 February 2024 (UTC) reply

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. DoubleGrazing ( talk) 18:44, 9 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello, 14 novembre,

I watch the Move log and I was noticing that you were moving your User pages around a lot today, probably unnecessarily. That drew my attention to them and they seem like personal pages that have nothing to do with your work on Wikipedia or creating articles. I will not tag them for speedy deletion, CSD G5. but if another editor like a page patroller spots them, they could easily be deleted. I tell you this so that you can make a copy of the content, if you wish to keep it, somewhere else like on your home computer or a blog or website you might use. We have had lots of newer editors (and even some longtime editors) who primarily just edit their own User pages and use Wikipedia as a web-host for charts of their fantasy football league or a fictitious country they invented or statistics about a reality show they watch. When these pages are tagged for speedy deletion G5 they are almost immediately deleted so here's a head's up that if you want to preserve a copy of any personal content, I'd copy it sooner rather than later.

I typically direct editors who might have questions to go to the Teahouse but I think if you do mention these pages, they will be quickly tagged. So, just read over Wikipedia:User pages#What may I noth have in my user pages?. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:28, 23 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Thank you very much for your advice. I copied. Although the information contained was not "fantasy", I see what you mean. Thanks again and kind regards 14 novembre ( talk) 22:35, 23 February 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Liz. 14 novembre ( talk) 22:35, 23 February 2024 (UTC) reply

• I would add that you should keep WP:UPNOT in mind: "you should avoid substantial content on your user page that is unrelated to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a general hosting service, so your user page is not a personal website. Your user page is about you as a Wikipedian, and pages in your user space should be used as part of your efforts to contribute to the project." Pages such as:
  • User:14 novembre/blankpage
  • User:14 novembre/Sandbox 2 - 99 greatest footballers of all time
  • User:14 novembre/Sandbox 2 - 93 greatest footballers of all time
  • User:14 novembre/Sandbox 2 - 78 greatest footballers of all time
  • User:14 novembre/Sandbox 2 - 67 greatest footballers of all time
  • User:14 novembre/Sandbox 2 - 60 greatest footballers of all time
  • User:14 novembre/Sandbox 2 - 50 greatest footballers of all time
  • User:14 novembre/Sandbox 2 - 40 greatest footballers of all time
  • User:14 novembre/Sandbox 2 - 30 greatest footballers of all time
  • User:14 novembre/Sandbox 2 - 25 greatest footballers of all time
  • User:14 novembre/Sandbox 3 - 9 greatest goalkeepers of all time
  • User:14 novembre/Sandbox 3 - 10 greatest goalkeepers of all time
  • User:14 novembre/Sandbox 2 - 100 greatest footballers of all time
• are not useful to the project and you should think about requesting their deletion. That first one especially—in what world is the number 1 repeated 1.8 million times useful? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 04:36, 27 February 2024 (UTC) reply

  @ AirshipJungleman29 apart from the last two, they are all redirects, which can be deleted. Kind regards 14 novembre ( talk) 10:49, 27 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your contributions to Fossano Calcio S.S.D.. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. - MPGuy2824 ( talk) 03:36, 24 February 2024 (UTC) reply

ok, thanks 14 novembre ( talk) 00:33, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply

@ MPGuy2824. 14 novembre ( talk) 00:34, 25 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello 14 novembre,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Joseph Altschul for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Joseph Altschul to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

harrz ^talk 22:33, 28 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello 14 novembre,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Platinum Moon for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Platinum Moon to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

harrz ^talk 22:33, 28 February 2024 (UTC) reply

When you draftify articles, you need to advise the article creator that you've performed the move to draft space.-- Ponyo ^{bons mots} 22:41, 28 February 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Ponyo Oh, thanks for having told me. I thought it was done automatically. Could you kindly explain how to do it? Thank you so much 14 novembre ( talk) 23:20, 28 February 2024 (UTC) reply

It would be best to avoid new page patrolling altogether until you have more experience with editing in general.-- Ponyo ^{bons mots} 23:22, 28 February 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Ponyo Thanks for your advice. Kind regards 14 novembre ( talk) 23:58, 28 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Not to pick on you, your edits just keep popping up on my various watchlist filters. Please don't welcome editors who have not yet made any contributions. There are many reasons why we don't do this, and it's specifically advised against at Wikipedia:Welcoming committee.-- Ponyo ^{bons mots} 00:40, 29 February 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Ponyo Thanks again for your advice. I will read it carefully before welcoming again someone. 14 novembre ( talk) 00:42, 29 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello,

Thank you for your help at AFC/R. Please make sure you are properly closing requests, which can be done if you use a tool such as afcrc-helper. There are many things you aren't doing, such as marking a section as closed, adding talk banners, etc., and such tools will automate that for you. ~ Eejit43 ( talk) 13:36, 29 February 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Eejit43 Thank you very much for your kind advice. However, I am not able to activate the tool. Could you kindly help me? Thanks 14 novembre ( talk) 13:39, 29 February 2024 (UTC) reply

What are you having trouble with? It seems like you installed it and then blanked your common.js... ~ Eejit43 ( talk) 13:40, 29 February 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Eejit43 Apparently an error notice appeared, so I immediately blanked it. I am not very practical with commons.js so I wanted to avoid damage. However, if you think I added the right content, I will restore. Thank you so much. 14 novembre ( talk) 13:44, 29 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Seems like you have a handle on it now! Just so you know, you can handle multiple requests in one run, you don't have to submit each time. ~ Eejit43 ( talk) 13:50, 29 February 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Eejit43 Thanks, I will consider doing as you suggested. Kind regards 14 novembre ( talk) 13:51, 29 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi. Your edit to that new user's page was against WP-EN practice (see [1]). I have reverted it and welcomed the user (as you might have done). We do not assume bad faith about a new user's intentions. As with everything - evidence is the key. If, as a new user your very first edit is deleted, with no reason given, that is a strong indicator that the user will not feel welcomed and will not stay. You are relatively new here, and have been treated with courtesy despite several notable errors based on lack of familiarity with the policies and working practices on this particular WP. Please try to consider the implications and correctness or your actions. Consider looking for a relevant page of guidance, for example. This is especially important in dealing with new user's initial contributions. We all make mistakes :). Leaky caldron ( talk) 17:31, 29 February 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Leaky caldron I am sorry, thanks for yur advice, I will take it into account. Kind regards 14 novembre ( talk) 17:32, 29 February 2024 (UTC) reply

I have just declined 4 speedy deletion requests that you made. Please read and understand the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging any more pages for speedy deletion. Neither Draft:Chiaretto Calò, nor Draft:Emmanuel Chami qualify as promotional. G11 applies only if the article would need a complete rewrite. Neither Draft:Chak 14 Gd Tehsildar, nor Draft:Meru Khavas qualify as patent nonsense. G1 is really only for gibberish. In the first case, it's very poor English, but poor writing is not gibberish. In the second case, you tagged it for speedy deletion 2 minutes after the last edit. It was a work in progress and the single bit of text at the time of tagging was the name of a person which you could have easily seen by looking at the provided reference.

I see you've received notices now from multiple editors about a variety of tasks that you are trying to do. IT's great that you want to help out in some of the nuts and bolts areas of Wikipedia, but it might be a good idea to focus on content work for now so you getter a better understanding of how and why those areas fit into developing an encyclopedia. -- Whpq ( talk) 13:07, 2 March 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Whpq Thanks for your advice. Kind regards 14 novembre ( talk) 13:39, 2 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks for your contributions to Marco Civoli. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Otuọcha ( talk) 21:29, 2 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Ok 14 novembre ( talk) 21:38, 2 March 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Otuọcha Good evening 14 novembre ( talk) 21:38, 2 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks for reaching out. The page you created Draft: Marco Civoli seems not to have reached notability as there were poor referencing and little or no context to establish notability. I should have go through AFD but haven't even gotten the context of the subject. Much research seems there were just mentions of him on news sources. Please see checking notability status of a sportsperson or for a news commentator perhaps sports journalist. Please click on the resubmit button as it was declined. From the page history also, check the different reasons why it was declined at AFC and make sure to meet those criteria. All the best, Otuọcha ( talk) 21:46, 2 March 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Otuọcha Thanks, anyway I think Civoli is clearly notable, he was the official commentator for one of the best national football teams of all time for several years, which include a World Cup 2006 Victory. Kind regards 14 novembre ( talk) 21:48, 2 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Why did you revert this obviously good faith edit to another user's talk page? The editor had to go to the Help Desk to find out what was going on. I see you were pinged to that discussion but didn't respond. You only time you should revert an editor on a user talk page that is not your own, is for obvious vandalism. Pawnkingthree ( talk) 21:59, 3 March 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Pawnkingthree Yes you're right. I did a mistake. I always try to do my best, but sometimes I do mistakes. Hopefully they will be less in some time if I gain some more experience. Kind regards 14 novembre ( talk) 22:08, 3 March 2024 (UTC) reply

• @ 14 novembre: You thanked me for advice, but apparently, have not actually taken the advice. I'm going to be a bit more blunt. Edits like the one you are being warned for here are disruptive. I believe you are doing this to try to help, but you are getting it wrong very often. Well meaning disruptive edits are still disruptive edits. This must stop. If you continue like this, you may find yourself blocked from editing. -- Whpq ( talk) 22:12, 3 March 2024 (UTC) reply

  @ Whpq As I said before, I am trying to help, however, I realise that I should be more careful and I will try my best to do so. Kind regards 14 novembre ( talk) 22:17, 3 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi, can I just ask, why do you keep making these sort of hidden, seemingly meaningless edits to your user page? -- DoubleGrazing ( talk) 10:30, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Obviously seeing that 14 novembre os still learning. DoubleGrazing, it may be them trying to figure a userbox or committed identity. Leave the folk breath! Otuọcha ( talk) 13:02, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Otuọcha: seriously? Adding a couple of characters every now and then, over a long series of edits? Really?

Also, I wasn't asking you; I think it would be more useful if 14 novembre answered. Thank you, -- DoubleGrazing ( talk) 13:12, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply

@ DoubleGrazing I honestly don't exactly remember. Anyway nothing serious, just 2 edits. It was only once that I did a number of dummy edits on my user page. Anyway I will not do such edits anymore, if you think it's better I will delete the hidden text 14 novembre ( talk) 14:14, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Kind regards 14 novembre ( talk) 14:14, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Far more than "2 edits". Your user page has 90+ edits in total, the majority of which could probably be described as 'dummy'. This hidden text alone is the result of 30+ edits: cjdjdjdjdjdjddhshsjjsksndjhhshsusdhshsjsjshsjbjkkbjbkjhbzbdhdjkdndjjdjddkdjdkdkdhzbshshsjshdbdbdhhdjddiddddjjddjdjznsbsdjdjdkddjdkdkdkddidhshjsjsjshdhdjd!. But okay, if you can't remember why you do these things, you can't remember. Thank you for responding. -- DoubleGrazing ( talk) 14:30, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi. As pointed out in Wikipedia:Copyrights, Wikipedia content can be copied, modified, and redistributed if and only if the copied version is made available on the same terms to others and acknowledgment of the authors of the Wikipedia article used is included. Hence, yes, the content can be used, it's not fair on their side not having acknowledged the work of Wikipedia contributors. Maybe, the author of the article is not aware of that. On the second point of your message, I have no idea on when it will be in place, the discussion is still ongoing. Atlante ( talk) 17:52, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Atlante Thank you very much for your answer. 14 novembre ( talk) 19:42, 4 March 2024 (UTC) reply

I reverted your edit on this page, as it broke the link to the article. I am not an Italian speaker and I don't know if "di" is more correct than "del". I did however check google links to see which is the more common name, and Circuito del Montenero returned over 5 million hits with Circuito di Montenero about 75,000 hits. I also checked the Italian Wikipedia article, which uses "di" in the title but then continues with "del". At any rate, our article here is called Circuito del Montenero. If you feel this should be different, I suggest you start there.-- Atlan ( talk) 14:13, 8 March 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Atlan OK, thanks for your explanation 14 novembre ( talk) 14:14, 8 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Kind regards 14 novembre ( talk) 14:14, 8 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1700, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Creation. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:07, 9 March 2024 (UTC) reply

You have been previously told about taking care with speedy deletion. You have applied incorrect speedy deletion tags to Draft:City Slicker twice. Drafts are note articles so speedy deletions that apply to articles do not apply to drafts. Please read and understand the criteria for speedy deletion. I suggest when you think you want to tag something for speedy deletion, stop and then ready the actual pol[icy page for that criterion and determine if it really applies. -- Whpq ( talk) 19:41, 13 March 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Whpq Yes, you're right, the criterion I suggested actually applies only to namespace articles, so the draft can be kept. I shall be more careful in the future, making sure articles i tag for speedy deletion actually correspond to the criteria. Anyway thanks for your notification and kind regards. 14 novembre ( talk) 19:43, 13 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello, 14 novembre,

Please review Wikipedia:DRAFTOBJECT. Editors have a right to object to an article being moved from main space to Draft space and can move it back. Do not draftify an article more than once, whether it is by you or another editor. Find other ways of dealing with the article such as a) improving the article yourself, b) tagging it to indicate problems with the article (but do not overtag it) or c) pursuing a form of deletion if the content is truly unacceptable. But you can not insist that an article remain in Draft space.

If you have questions about this, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:58, 23 March 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Liz Yes, you're right. The article is clearly unacceptable, so I'm going to list it for deletion. Thanks for the notice and kind regards 14 novembre ( talk) 19:21, 23 March 2024 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Strada statale 1 Via Aurelia, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Due and Rosignano.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:01, 24 March 2024 (UTC) reply

This is one of many, picked at random, that you've declined to move to mainspace without, I would think by the time you spend on each one, checking all the sources. This page has many sources. Please remember that every article that is declined that should have been accepted into mainspace is the work of a fellow Wikipedian, and if incorrectly declined then the editor may never come back or anyone ever look at the page again, thus Wikipedia loses the knowledge within. In this particular case you also point to a deletion of the page in 2017 as part of your reasoning when that has little relevance to the sources added since (this individuals obvious notability as an actor occurred after the 2017 AfD). Please be much more careful and check all the sources before declining pages, thanks. Randy Kryn ( talk) 10:25, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Randy Kryn Oh I'm sorry, I thought the 2017 AfD was still valid so I didn't actually check the sources. Thanks for having told me. Kind regards 14 novembre ( talk) 🇮🇹 11:45, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks for an honest appraisal. Maybe you have other similar declines of pages (I did pick this one at random on your history list) that you can check, thanks. Not your declining, but a few days ago another editor and I "saved" an article from the decliners which was obviously notable (the United States House of Representatives official painting of Abraham Lincoln!), so yes, the decline/acceptance of new pages by Wikipedians should be tread carefully and I have a nagging feeling that maybe thousands of mainspaceable pages haven't been mainspaced and have been lost somewhere in the draft-universe. Randy Kryn ( talk) 12:04, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Absolutely, I will do so. Thanks for your suggestions, and kind regards 14 novembre ( talk) 🇮🇹 12:09, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Randy Kryn 14 novembre ( talk) 🇮🇹 12:09, 29 March 2024 (UTC) reply

For an AfD that long ago, a fresh look is warranted. If the AfD is in the past year, I look at the AfD to see if was well-attended and if it is clear editors searched for/reviewed sources. If so, I generally put more weight on sources since the AfD (depends on what was said in the AfD) and if not, I give it fresh look.

@ Randy Kryn you might be interested in User:SDZeroBot/G13 soon. There's also a list of other reports in the header. S0091 ( talk) 15:02, 30 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello S0091, and yes, not only a fresh look for Derek Webster but his notability occurred after the AfD. Perhaps you or 14 novembre can mainspace it (I don't do draft reviews and not sure of the procedures), thanks. Will take a look at the links you mention. Randy Kryn ( talk) 15:11, 30 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks for resubmitting, but this one deserves a quick move to mainspace after two incorrect reviews. 14 novembre, maybe you can handle this, thanks. Randy Kryn ( talk) 15:16, 30 March 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Randy Kryn Just moved. 14 novembre ( talk) 🇮🇹 15:17, 30 March 2024 (UTC) reply

@ S0091 Thanks for your suggestions. Kind regards 14 novembre ( talk) 🇮🇹 15:18, 30 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Sorry, I got a phone call right after I resubmitted it. This is a reasonable accept and a reasonable AfD. I did look but can't find any SIGCOV sources so it is dependent on WP:NACTOR. Will see what the community decides. S0091 ( talk) 17:09, 30 March 2024 (UTC) reply

@ S0091 No problem. I agree with you. Kind regards 14 novembre ( talk) 🇮🇹 19:00, 30 March 2024 (UTC) reply

I've nom'd this for AFD again. None of the references have significant coverage. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:51, 30 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello ! Please explain what's wrong? I explained the reason of edit . Reconsider my edit, and if all this is good, then please return it. I think you are wrong. 46.166.61.173 ( talk) 09:38, 30 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello, @ 14 novembre. I was trying to create the redirect Ånneröd to go to Östra Ånneröd, and it was declined saying there aren't sources for it. I'm not sure what counts as a source, but on the Swedish wikipedia it is known just as Ånneröd with Östra Ånneröd being the long form of the name. I know that in 2010 the town was renamed as Östra Ånneröd, but it's hard to find an English source for it. Tack! Casablanca 🪨^{( T)} 14:21, 31 March 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Casablanca Rock Other Wikipedias are not valid sources. See WP:SOURCES. Kind regards 14 novembre ( talk) 🇮🇹 14:23, 31 March 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello 14 novembre. Is it normal for editors to make a series of edits to an article instead of making all the edits in a single revision? -- Mypetmiacid ( talk) 00:42, 1 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello @ Mypetmiacid. Users usually can decide if doing many edits or doing a single edit together. So it I'd quite normal, as you said, for editors to make a series of edits to an article instead of making all the edits in a single revision. Feel free to do as you prefer. Kind regards 14 novembre ( talk) 🇮🇹 08:30, 1 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello, how can I edit an article and publish it as a draft? For example, I want to expand this article with new content, but I don't want to directly edit the main article in case something is incorrect. -- Arcosenautic ( talk) 15:16, 1 April 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Arcosenautic If you want to create a new article, you can create it as a draft (see WP:DRAFTS) and then submit it for review. However, if you want to edit an existing article, you can't do so. You can write on your Sandbox where you can try freely, or you can try to edit directly the article and look at the preview before publishing so you make sure you haven't done mistakes. Hope I was helpful.

Kind regards 14 novembre ( talk) 🇮🇹 17:19, 1 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Thank you very much. I will copy the article on my sandbox and publish it when ready (with verified sources). Thank you! Arcosenautic ( talk) 16:12, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Thank you for tagging User talk:Mannlowe Information Services for G11. I've removed the tag because admins usually leave a block notice on talk pages when they block users. So, deleting and recreating the talk page doesn't make much sense. The best approach is to remove the promotional material and report them. Thanks once again for your contributions! – DreamRimmer ( talk) 10:39, 2 April 2024 (UTC) reply

@ DreamRimmer Thanks for your advice. Kind regards 14 novembre ( talk) 🇮🇹 12:59, 2 April 2024 (UTC) reply

It looks like you haven't received any barnstars yet, so let me award you your first one. You definitely deserve it! – DreamRimmer ( talk) 14:15, 2 April 2024 (UTC) reply

	The Special Barnstar
	Your contributions are truly appreciated. Here's a token of recognition for your outstanding efforts! – DreamRimmer ( talk) 14:20, 2 April 2024 (UTC) reply

@ DreamRiregard Thank you so much!

Kind regards 14 novembre ( talk) 🇮🇹 19:42, 2 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Как да създам страница -- RADIO HOP ( talk) 06:25, 4 April 2024 (UTC) reply

@ RADIO HOP See WP:FIRSTARTICLE. Anyway I don't speak Russian and I used google translate to understand your question. This is the English Wikipedia and we can accept only articles in Englisj. Kind regards 14 novembre ( talk) 🇮🇹 08:07, 4 April 2024 (UTC) reply

How much time it will take to g live my page? -- Chaitanya Gadagamma ( talk) 10:05, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

( talk page watcher) @ Chaitanya Gadagamma: It will not. It was deleted. See your talk page for an explanation. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:09, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

do we use oxford commas? -- Willzadl ( talk) 16:44, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Willzadl See the Manual of Style. Kind regards 14 novembre ( talk) 🇮🇹 17:04, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

When should I link to another article? -- Willzadl ( talk) 17:14, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Willzadl See WP:LINKS 14 novembre ( talk) 🇮🇹 17:14, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

thanks very much, would you be willing to review my changes of this article? I've made a lot of changes and need some proofreading, I think.

https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Ny%C3%ADregyh%C3%A1za_Zoo&editingStatsId=06e6bf584fb0771c01b8&editingStatsOversample=1&gesuggestededit=1 Willzadl ( talk) 17:47, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Willzadl Seems absolutely fine, thanks for your contributions. Kind regards 14 novembre ( talk) 🇮🇹 17:53, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

thanks again! Willzadl ( talk) 17:56, 5 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi 14 novembre. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

• Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or Ultraviolet. It just adds a [Rollback] button next to a page's latest live revision - that's all. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only. Never use rollback to revert good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the rights will be revoked.
• Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask!

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Fastily 20:22, 7 April 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Fastily I will absolutely take into account your helpful suggestions. Happy editing to you and Kind regards! 14 novembre ( talk) 🇮🇹 21:33, 7 April 2024 (UTC) reply

I note that you are blocked for socking on another project, and that an account you were alleged to have used improperly there has also been briefly active on this project. Without suggesting that you have acted improperly here, if the other account is indeed yours, I urge you to mark it as an alternative of this one, lest you also be blocked here. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry#Legitimate uses and especially the templates mentioned in its final paragraph. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:22, 8 April 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Pigsonthewing Which is this account? 14 novembre ( talk) 🇮🇹 17:21, 8 April 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Pigsonthewing I suppose you mean User:Calicanto2023. I had declared it in my userpage (which has been deleted), precising that I will not use it anymore for no reason. Kind regards 14 novembre ( talk) 🇮🇹 17:34, 8 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Yes, that one, but the same applies if you have others. What was in a deleted page is irrelevant Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:41, 8 April 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Pigsonthewing OK. Where can I declare it? 14 novembre ( talk) 🇮🇹 17:55, 8 April 2024 (UTC) reply

You already know, cos you had three on your user page. Put them there. - UtherSRG (talk) 18:41, 8 April 2024 (UTC) reply

@ UtherSRG OK. How can I restore my old user page I deleted? 151.57.6.214 ( talk) 19:54, 8 April 2024 (UTC) reply

I was accidentally unlogged. 14 novembre ( talk) 🇮🇹 19:56, 8 April 2024 (UTC) reply

I have restored your talk page. You could have filed a request at WP:RFU, or you could have simply posted the three templates. - UtherSRG (talk) 01:07, 9 April 2024 (UTC) reply

14 novembre, in your cleanup you accidentally removed Arco di Travertino as a previous account so I suggest you add that one back. S0091 ( talk) 19:36, 9 April 2024 (UTC) reply

@ S0091 Oh yes, thanks for having told me. I restored. Kind regards 14 novembre ( talk) 🇮🇹 20:57, 9 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Well this ( it:Categoria:Wikipedia:Cloni sospetti di Calicanto2023) seems like a relevant category to mention. I certainly hope the creation of new accounts to evade your ban at the Italian Wikipedia has stopped, as a fair number of those accounts do appear to be from January. Hey man im josh ( talk) 12:50, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Hey man im josh What should I do? They are not active here. Anyway, I will take time to make sure I do the right decision. Kind regards 14 novembre ( talk) 🇮🇹 16:18, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

@ 14 novembre: To be blunt, you shouldn't have socked on any Wiki to begin with. You were initially blocked, from what I can understand using Google translation, for competency concerns. For the time being, it'd be ideal to at least make it past 6 months without evading a block on another Wiki (a number of those accounts were blocked in January). At which point perhaps another admin may be comfortable granting you NPR (I will not be comfortable doing so given the history). Hey man im josh ( talk) 16:24, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Hey man im josh What is NPR? 14 novembre ( talk) 🇮🇹 16:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

It's short for new page reviewer, a permission you recently applied for and I declined. Hey man im josh ( talk) 16:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

I concur with josh. I'm questioning why you should retain rollbacker. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:29, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Hey man im josh Ah ok. I hadn't realised all this was due to the NPR request. 14 novembre ( talk) 🇮🇹 16:31, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello mentor, how do I create my Wikipedia profile? -- Briljay ( talk) 03:15, 9 April 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Briljay Wikipedia is not a social network, so we dont have 'profiles'. If you mean an account, you already have one, the one from which you are writing. If you mean an article about yourself, see WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY. Kind regards 14 novembre ( talk) 🇮🇹 07:58, 9 April 2024 (UTC) reply

( talk page watcher) @ Briljay: If you are talking about your userpage, please see WP:Userpage. - UtherSRG (talk) 10:38, 9 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi @ 14 novembre, can you review this draft article Draft:Krishnamma (2024 film). Thankyou! Pulmowrites ( talk) 13:01, 9 April 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Pulmowrites

 Done 14 novembre ( talk) 🇮🇹 13:04, 9 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi mentor I’m lucky to have u in my editing journey! Anyways so I accidentally made a edit in the wrong article and I got 4 warnings and my delete button doesn’t work so I couldn’t stop so now I’m just sad -- Dannoscriteria ( talk) 19:04, 9 April 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Dannoscriteria Next time try do be more careful. For example, you could use the "show preview" function before publishing, so you are sure there's nothing wrong. Kind regards 14 novembre ( talk) 🇮🇹 21:00, 9 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Published -- User-Mickey ( talk) 23:54, 10 April 2024 (UTC) reply

@ User-Mickey What do you mean? Please explain your request better. Thanks 14 novembre ( talk) 🇮🇹 09:13, 11 April 2024 (UTC) reply

@ 14 novembre, If possible Requesting you to review the draft article Draft:UV Creations. 2409:4070:8E8D:3585:593A:B50C:71DA:76B0 ( talk) 11:25, 12 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hi there @ 14 novembre I stumbled across your page, I hope you're doing well. Kudos to your wikibreak, it's always nice to wind down and reset from online activities. I was working almost daily on Draft:T-Money (rapper) and I realized I needed to take a breather as well. When you are back and rested from your break, would you be willing to review my draft? I'd appreciate your feedback. Cheers, Taevchoi ( talk) 17:59, 17 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Twinkle1990 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please don't use Instagram posts as a source. Instaed, find some WP:RS as sourcing to the claims. Please see WP:SPS.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Loghman Madayen (activist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Twinkle1990 ( talk) 13:12, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rosignano railway station and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Toadette ^{( Let's talk together!)} 14:20, 21 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello! I am new to using Wikipedia. I started a draft in Sandbox last week, but I cannot find it now. Is there a specific way to access drafts that I might be missing? It was so close to done! -- Arnold-Goldman-MonsterMakers ( talk) 14:16, 24 April 2024 (UTC) reply

( talk page watcher) Your Special:Contributions/Arnold-Goldman-MonsterMakers would have it if you'd saved it. Doesn't look like you did. If it were deleted it would show up in Special:DeletedContributions/Arnold-Goldman-MonsterMakers. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:24, 24 April 2024 (UTC) reply