Why is there no mention in this article that Oddworld Inhabitants inked an exclusivity deal with Microsoft to develop Oddworld games only for the Xbox?
I assume there are additionally resources that argue this is the reason for Oddworld's departure from games after the original Xbox failed to take off (not just that Lanning was mad at EA). But, even if there aren't, the inked deal is still a pretty big event for the company. Why is it absent? RealmRPGer ( talk) 22:00, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
"...called
Oddworld: New 'n' Tasty!."
Should the period be removed?--
Adûnâi (
talk) 19:17, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Oddworld Inhabitants. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:43, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Oddworld Inhabitants. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:02, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
I'm gonna try my hand at trimming this down. In the meantime, hot take but I should ask before I do anything drastic. Is there "future" section even necessary? i might just delete it in its entirety. It doesn't have any encyclopedic information at all, only speculative business-related quotes from Lanning. Wikipedia isn't a quote repository. QueensanditsCrazy ( talk) 20:31, 1 March 2021 (UTC)