This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Jeanine Pirro article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Jeanine Pirro. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Jeanine Pirro at the Reference desk. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To-do list for Jeanine Pirro:
|
The
contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to articles about
living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which has been
designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which is a contentious topic. Please consult the procedures and edit carefully. |
Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute. |
It has been stated in a letter to a police organization that she was under federal investigation. Is anyone able to uncover the nature and results of that investigation?
Why are there so many "small" awards? I don't think even other major figures here have such an extensive list. Is this self-promotion and does it add to the article?
This section needs work. For example, it says on 'Saturday." In 3 years, no one will know when that "Saturday" was. Also, the section seems redundant. It just needs work. It sucks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.115.197.98 ( talk) 05:23, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Jeanine Pirro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 12:01, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Jeanine Pirro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:39, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
http://www.breitbart.com/video/2017/10/28/pirro-hillary-time-lock/
Someone, please explain what this is and why it belongs in the article. [6] Snooganssnoogans ( talk) 22:24, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
User removed this material because they think Newsweek has "slipped" in quality. User's viewpoints on Newsweek are irrelevant as to whether these events actually occurred.
A sizable part of the body is devoted to her pro-Trump commentary, with a number of RS saying that this is what she is known for. There is no justification for removing it from the lede. Snooganssnoogans ( talk) 10:18, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
An editor keeps adding 'journalist' to the article. Snooganssnoogans ( talk) 13:05, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Since this page is locked, could someone look at this sentence: "On March 16, 2019, Fox News decided not to air her show replacing it with a recast of a Scandalous episode in its time slot.[36]" The use of recast should be rebroadcast. Merriam-Webster, Oxford English, and Cambridge English dictionaries all basically define "recast" as change (usually in regards to acting) Nothing about a re-airing, rebroadcasting; so there is a difference. 174.29.130.241 ( talk) 13:12, 22 March 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.29.130.241 ( talk) 13:07, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Should there be some sort of acknowledgement of the fact that Dominion and other voting systems were largely scrutinized prior to the 2020 election by outlets such as The New York Times, New Yorker Magazine, and the Daily Beast? The New York Times and The New Yorker wrote a very critical exposé on the voting systems prior to the 2018 midterm elections [1] [2] and the Daily Beast suggested that Russia was determined to hack the vulnerable systems [3] -- the reason I suggest this is because the article gives the impression that the concerns over ability for the voting systems to be hacked is fiction, and suggestions that the machines were hacked were created following the 2020 elections when, in reality, the public's awareness of the machines flaws had been widely publicized beginning in 2018.
References
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In popular culture: Portrayed by Cecily Strong on "Saturday Night Live." 67.242.216.6 ( talk) 01:14, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
I'd like to reopen this request. According to NBC's page describing Cecily Strong's work on Saturday Night Live ( https://www.nbc.com/saturday-night-live/credits/repertory-player/cecily-strong) "She has earned rave reviews for her notable impressions of Judge Jeanine Pirro, Sen. Dianne Feinstein and Melania Trump."
Judge Jeanine Pirro is also listed in the "Celebrity impersonations" section on Strong's Wikipedia page: /info/en/?search=Cecily_Strong
There are also a number of sources that describe Strong's impersonation, including Rolling Stone ( https://www.rollingstone.com/tv-movies/tv-movie-news/snl-cecily-strong-jeanine-pirro-tackles-kyle-rittenhouse-verdict-in-cold-open-1260754/), USA Today ( https://www.usatoday.com/videos/entertainment/2021/11/21/cecily-strong-reprises-snl-role-judge-jeanine-pirro/8712416002/) and ( https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/tv/2021/05/22/snl-finale-cecily-strong-drinks-and-sings-judge-jeanine-pirro/5231059001/), and Vanity Fair ( https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2021/08/awards-insider-cecily-strong-characters-snl). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:192:4c80:3000:4bf:11ad:774d:6ade ( talk) 00:20, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
the wikipedia says "In March 2019, on her show Justice with Judge Jeanine Pirro criticized Rep. Ilhan Omar for questioning the loyalty of American Jews to the US," but Omar did not do that. An argument could certainly be made that she did, but stating it as a fact - especially without a source - is a blatant lie. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nomorestrawmen ( talk • contribs) 09:32, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Request to add “allegedly” before “false claims” in this paragraph. The case has not concluded, and the allegations have Not Yet been proven.
She has been named a defendant in a 2021 lawsuit by the company Smartmatic, in relation to false claims of election fraud in the 2020 United States presidential election. [1] Raudrhauk ( talk) 22:51, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Paragraph should state “allegedly false claims,” because the case hasn’t gone to trial and nothing has been proven either way regarding the Plaintiff’s claim. Raudrhauk ( talk) 22:54, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
References
{{
edit semi-protected}}
template. Wikipedia consensus is more is less clear to say that the claims of fraud were "false" and not "allegedly false" regarding the 2020 election.
Spinning
Ceres 01:36, 9 February 2022 (UTC)I'm pretty sure there was rent control during World War II. Please check it out. If there was I was only 12 when the war ended so have no idea whether FDR or congress instituted rent control. 172.77.152.219 ( talk) 22:58, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
The Trump Russia collusion conspiracy was proven false. Many outlets have published withdrawals and rebuttals. The nugget at the center of the conspiracy was the “Steele Dossier” which was funded by the Hillary Clinton campaign. Let’s tell the truth in Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8807:320A:A800:5EA:5ADE:C3DF:5FD8 ( talk) 08:29, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The Smartmatic defamation case against her was dismissed in 2022, but reinstated in 2023.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-02-14/giuliani-pirro-thrown-back-into-2020-vote-fraud-defamation-case 71.178.177.43 ( talk) 15:47, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
you can not prove or state Pirro made false claims about voting machine fraud. Voting machine fraud is very possible. You put her in the light of being a liar. This needs to be removed. 38.133.115.25 ( talk) 02:13, 29 March 2024 (UTC)