This article is written in
British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other
varieties of English. According to the
relevant style guide, this should not be changed without
broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to
ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Northern Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Northern Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Northern IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject Northern IrelandTemplate:WikiProject Northern IrelandNorthern Ireland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Scotland and
Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cornwall, an attempt to improve and expand Wikipedia coverage of
Cornwall and all things Cornish. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the
project member page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.CornwallWikipedia:WikiProject CornwallTemplate:WikiProject CornwallCornwall-related articles
See drop-down box for suggested article edit guidelines:
Be bold - if you know something about
Cornwall then put it in! We value your contributions and don't be afraid if your spelling isn't great as there are plenty of spelling and grammar experts on clean-up duty!
Articles on settlements in Cornwall should be written using the standard set of headings approved by the UK geography WikiProject's guideline
How to write about settlements.
At
WikiProject Cornwall we subscribe to the
policies laid down by Wikipedia - particularly
civility and
consensus building. We are aware that the wording on
Cornish entries can sometimes be a contentious topic, especially those concerning geography. You don't have to agree with everything but there is no excuse for rudeness and these things are best solved through consensus building and compromise. For more information see
WP:CornwallGuideline.
These pages are not platforms for political discussion. Issues relating to Cornish politics should be restricted to those pages that directly deal with these issues (such as
Constitutional status of Cornwall,
Cornish nationalism, etc) and should not overflow into other articles.
Most of all have fun editing - that's the reason we all do this, right?!
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Channel Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Channel Islands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Channel IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject Channel IslandsTemplate:WikiProject Channel IslandsChannel Islands-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Isle of Man, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
Isle of Man on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Isle of ManWikipedia:WikiProject Isle of ManTemplate:WikiProject Isle of ManIsle of Man articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jersey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Jersey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject JerseyTemplate:WikiProject JerseyJersey articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
British Empire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British EmpireWikipedia:WikiProject British EmpireTemplate:WikiProject British EmpireBritish Empire articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Overseas Territories, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
British Overseas Territories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British Overseas TerritoriesWikipedia:WikiProject British Overseas TerritoriesTemplate:WikiProject British Overseas TerritoriesBritish Overseas Territories articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Antarctica, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Antarctica on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AntarcticaWikipedia:WikiProject AntarcticaTemplate:WikiProject AntarcticaAntarctica articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the countries of the
Caribbean on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the
welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.CaribbeanWikipedia:WikiProject CaribbeanTemplate:WikiProject CaribbeanCaribbean articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject South America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
South America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject South AmericaTemplate:WikiProject South AmericaSouth America articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gibraltar, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gibraltar and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GibraltarWikipedia:WikiProject GibraltarTemplate:WikiProject GibraltarGibraltar articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Polynesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Polynesia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolynesiaWikipedia:WikiProject PolynesiaTemplate:WikiProject PolynesiaPolynesia articles
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.
Confusing
A basic point – what is a 'British' person? – is unclear in this article. The lead defines it with some clarity and the final sentence mentions the diaspora, separating its members from 'the British'. But later there's "Britons – people with British citizenship or of British descent", which redefines 'British', and the presence of a diaspora map in the infobox and a (very long) list of countries implies that the diaspora is also 'British'. I'm confident that there aren't 72 million British citizens (the opening sentence definition) in the US. How we can clarify for readers?
EddieHugh (
talk) 22:27, 23 June 2022 (UTC)reply
English people tend to think of 'British' as a term invented to be inclusive of the Scots, Welsh, and Irish. Primarily they take it to mean Celtic people, people with hairy legs.
Burraron (
talk) 15:34, 18 April 2023 (UTC)reply
The lede should simply make this double-usage clear: it can refer to people of "British descent" (English, Scottish, Manx, Welsh, other historical British Isles) or it can refer to people of British citizenship.
DenverCoder9 (
talk) 02:46, 16 August 2023 (UTC)reply
Semi-protected edit request on 21 September 2022
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
I wish to hyperlink the name of the author of reference number 236, as a Wikipedia page has been created for that author recently.
DetuchVonzer (
talk) 06:10, 21 September 2022 (UTC)reply
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (
non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (
投稿) 14:41, 5 October 2022 (UTC)reply
I'm not convinced. What is the consistency argument? "British people" is hardly lengthy or cumbersome. Briton may well be a common name but, as an article title, has the disadvantage of ambiguity, in that the
Ancient Britons are commonly referred to simply as Britons; I imagine this will have influenced your Ngram result.
Mutt Lunker (
talk) 11:16, 28 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Oppose - I am also unconvinced owing to the confusion with
Ancient Britons. As per Mutt Lunker, these are commonly just referred to as Britons, and importantly, this page does not treat them as such in its present form, concentrating only on the mix of all ancient peoples that make the British People. This page is correctly about the British people and would need rewriting under a different name. I think it would be confusing and unhelpful to make this change.
Sirfurboy🏄 (
talk) 11:22, 28 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Oppose as per confusion with
Ancient Britons and seeing as there is not necessarily strict continuity between modern British people and the ancient Britons.
Bayonet-lightbulb (
talk) 14:06, 28 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Why is it "puke-inducing"? We are Britons! I'm not sure I agree with the proposed move, but this is a bizarre and frankly infantile response that deserves to be ignored by the closer. --
Necrothesp (
talk) 15:38, 28 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Support. A hatnote at the top of the article pointing to
Ancient Britons takes care of any concerns of confusion. And I really don't think most readers are confused by this anyway. Most English-speaking people use the term "Britons" to be synonymous with British people. Just like even though technically the term
Americans can mean anyone from North or South American, most English-speaking people use it to refer to people from the United States of America.
Rreagan007 (
talk) 16:27, 28 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Oppose, for the confusion reasons above.
Bazza (
talk) 17:22, 28 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Oppose - unnecessarily ambiguous, and page titles are intended to disambiguate.
Ghmyrtle (
talk) 17:40, 28 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Support per nom.
Shwcz (
talk) 20:09, 28 September 2022 (UTC)reply
oppose what century are we talking about here—
blindlynx 02:35, 29 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Once again, "Britons" is a perfectly normal and accurate term in the 21st century for people from Britain. You'll find it in any dictionary. There is no other single-word demonym for us. You don't say "Britishman" or "Britishwoman", do you? It's no weirder than German, American or Italian (or Canadian or Ukrainian). --
Necrothesp (
talk) 08:13, 29 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Everyone I know says “British”. That is what is on the UK census too, for that matter. I checked the ngram you posted, clicked on the most recent date for Britons, the first hit was
[1] and the second was
[2], supporting my suspicion that the most common modern sage of “Briton” refers to the ancient celtic Britons only.
Sirfurboy🏄 (
talk) 08:31, 29 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Agreed, it is another "perfectly normal and accurate term" and it is not "puke-inducinng" but the issue is as to whether it is a preferable term to the existing title. Per above, it is not.
Mutt Lunker (
talk) 09:58, 29 September 2022 (UTC)reply
My point is that you don't say "a British", like you say "an American" or "a Canadian". British is only an adjective, never a noun. If you want to use a single noun, you say "a Briton". There's nothing wrong with the word and it's completely current. I would happily describe myself as either British or a Briton (or English or an Englishman). As I said, I'm not sure I agree with the suggested change, as British people probably is the commoner term, but to describe it as "puke-inducing" or to say "what century are we talking about here" is ludicrous and fairly insulting to Britons. --
Necrothesp (
talk) 10:57, 29 September 2022 (UTC)reply
I know that is your point, those are the very things I was referring to when I said "agreed". And we are also agreed that that does not tip the balance in favour of the proposed change. Double-agreed, hooray.
Mutt Lunker (
talk) 12:17, 29 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Note that I was replying to Sirfurboy, not you, hence my original indentation which you then altered! --
Necrothesp (
talk) 13:03, 29 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Fair enough, there's clearly been an element of misunderstanding but, as Sirfurboy made no ref to the "puke-inducing" comment and I did, it was reasonable to assume that that, at least, was addressed to me. In regard to whether this proposal is worthy of adoption, the three of us are evidently not in support.
Mutt Lunker (
talk) 15:31, 29 September 2022 (UTC)reply
Oppose. "Britons" is ambiguous as against
Ancient Britons, and is not obviously the most common name. The current article title is the most natural and accurate reflection of its contents.
Tevildo (
talk) 18:05, 29 September 2022 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Number of British citizens in the United Kingdom
I don't want to get into complicated discussions here, but British people in the UK are clearly the entire population, except for those who do not have British nationality. So, according to the House of Commons Library, there are only 6 million people in the UK who are not British nationals. So if we take that number and subtract it from the total population determined by the World Bank (the same source used in the article), we get 61,326,569 British in the UK.
Logical though this is, we can't do it. Please read
WP:SYNTH. You can't use numbers from two different sources to calculate a new number that is not in a source. If a published source has done some calculation, you an cite that.
Sirfurboy🏄 (
talk) 07:52, 2 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Is simple math
WP:SYNTH? The chart doesn't show this because a chart showing what "100%" looks like isn't very helpful, so the number is the British diaspora (e.g., includes Australians of British descent living in Britain, but excludes British citizens of non-British descent.)
DenverCoder9 (
talk) 03:03, 16 August 2023 (UTC)reply
The calculation is simple, the contention behind it is not and is unsourced.
Mutt Lunker (
talk) 10:05, 16 August 2023 (UTC)reply
This is a mess
This whole article is in need of a complete rewrite. It is way out of date on recent Archaeological discoveries and on modern DNA research.
There is too much reliance on books by TV presenters rather than historians in the references.
Panama1958 (
talk) 05:40, 15 July 2023 (UTC)reply
