This article was nominated for deletion on 5 January 2009. The result of the discussion was Keep.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Florida Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Hotels Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hotels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the hospitality industry, including hotels, motels, resorts, and destination spas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HotelsWikipedia:WikiProject HotelsTemplate:WikiProject HotelsHotels articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Golf Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Golf, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Golf-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GolfWikipedia:WikiProject GolfTemplate:WikiProject GolfGolf articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I'm not sure why this is getting deleted? Can you explain or help me understand what's wrong with my text? I'm not trying to promote this company

Thank you Thinkchrisonline ( talk) 16:57, 5 January 2009 (UTC)Thinkchrisonline reply

I am not the person who flagged this for deletion, however I can explain why it was flagged.

Some of the phrases used in the article, like "premiere-event jewel", "such high stature", and "one of the circuit's finest courses" sound like they were written specifically to promote the club/tournament, and not from a neutral viewpoint. If those terms were used by a third-party reliable source to describe the club, then it may be ok to include them as direct quotes, as long as they are properly sourced. Putting them directly in the article makes it appear as though they are the opinions of the article's author, which violates Wikipedia's no original research policy.

Note that even if these concerns are addressed, the article may be deleted for other reasons. In particular, it appears that substantial portions of the article were copied from http://www.bayhill.com/fw/main/History-1594.html This is a violation of copyright, and the article can be deleted for that reason alone. In order to remain, the article also needs to demonstrate the notability of the Bay Hill Club. Given the fact that it is owned by Arnold Palmer and that major tournaments have been held there, it shouldn't be too hard to find reliable sources which have the Bay Hill Club as their subject.

I hope this answers your question. Let me know if you want clarification on any of this. -- Megaboz ( talk) 17:26, 5 January 2009 (UTC) reply

One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.arnoldpalmerinvitational.com/retrospective/tour-history.aspx http://www.bayhill.com/fw/main/History-1594.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. -- Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 18:36, 5 January 2009 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bay Hill Club and Lodge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131101084723/http://www.arnoldpalmer.com/BUSINESS/bayhill.aspx to http://www.arnoldpalmer.com/BUSINESS/bayhill.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{ Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:50, 29 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bay Hill Club and Lodge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131031114707/http://157.166.226.103/golfonline/travel/architects/wilson.html to http://157.166.226.103/golfonline/travel/architects/wilson.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:33, 16 July 2017 (UTC) reply