From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:Battle Natural Bridge Flag.jpg

Image:Battle Natural Bridge Flag.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 22:56, 31 May 2007 (UTC) reply

Battle of Natural Bridge

If you are interested in expanding the amount of information available to users on the Battle of Natural Bridge, please consider these two references:

The Battle of Natural Bridge website at http://www.exploresouthernhistory.com/nbindex

The Battle of Natural Bridge, Florida: The Confederate Defense of Tallahassee by Dale Cox, 2007, ISBN: 978-0-6151-6386-4

Thanks!

Dalec527 ( talk) 17:24, 25 November 2007 (UTC) reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Battle Natural Bridge Flag.jpg

Image:Battle Natural Bridge Flag.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot ( talk) 05:31, 2 January 2008 (UTC) reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Battle of Natural Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{ Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:26, 28 October 2016 (UTC) reply

Medal of Honor recipients, Battle of Natural Bridge

The article lists three Medal of Honor recipients at the Battle of Natural Bridge. There were three more for a total of six, and my g'g'grandfather, John Lanning was one of them. He was a Landsman on the USS Magnolia. You can see the details on his wikipedia page here - /info/en/?search=John_S._Lanning Thank you. 2001:5B0:4EDB:61F8:CA5:30F4:ED7:CB72 ( talk) 08:00, 15 July 2020 (UTC) reply

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by BlueMoonset  talk 15:34, 5 March 2024 (UTC) reply

(
)
Natural Bridge Monument
Natural Bridge Monument
  • ... that the Natural Bridge Battlefield Monument incorrectly claims Tallahassee, Florida to be the only Confederate capital not to be captured despite Austin, Texas also never being captured? Source: It is notable that even though the inscription claims that Tallahassee was the only capital of the South not captured by the Union during the Civil war, in actuality Austin Texas was also not captured during the war and never had enemy troops in any direction from it in a 100 mile radius, unlike Tallahassee had.
    • Reviewed:

Created by Vu-Lam L.N. ( talk). Self-nominated at 21:01, 12 February 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Battle of Natural Bridge; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page. reply

  • Article has not been expanded recently and therefore does not qualify for DYK; indeed, the only edit made, by another editor on the same day as this nomination, removed some prose while adding a source. Closing as unsuccessful. BlueMoonset ( talk) 15:34, 5 March 2024 (UTC) reply
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Battle_of_Natural_Bridge&oldid=1206742741"