This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Linguistics: Phonetics This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Phonetics Task Force. Lists Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The page at Lateral consonant has a list of lateral consonants, including:

• Voiced alveolar lateral
• Voiced retroflex lateral
• Voiced palatal lateral
• Voiced velar lateral

None of these links works. There were two others,

• Voiceless alveolar lateral fricative
• Voiced alveolar lateral fricative

for which I added redirects to the appropriate places. I don't know enough about phonology to be able to do this for the other four. -- Dominus 18:53, 30 Jul 2004 (UTC)

This is nowhere near a list of "all consonants", nor "all attested consonants", or even "all primary consonants" (ie. without a secondary articulation). "All consonants with dedicated single IPA symbol" would be closer, as well as "a manually up- and outdated index of Category:Consonants". So, opinions please: Is there a point to keeping this around that I'm missing, or should it just be worked on until it'd fulfill one of the first three descriptions? -- Tropylium 14:47, 12 September 2007 (UTC) reply

Yes.

Consonants may have many places of articulation simultaneously. At least two if that is lingual consonant, e.g. (radical, apical, dorsal)×(labial, interdental, alveolar, postalveolar) + palatalization + velarisation + pharyngealization. So that one-dimension list is too restricted. But sorry (uk:але жаль)! -- W.M.drossel ( talk) 10:51, 4 December 2009 (UTC) reply

I wrote befor think. I wrote lingual×labial, but meant labiodental. Do there realy exists linguolabial consonant??

-- W.M.drossel ( talk) 10:56, 4 December 2009 (UTC) reply

Yes: linguolabial consonant.

I agree there isn't much point to this. It also pretty much duplicates the table

And I say that as perhaps the person who's done the most work on this since 2006.

There's also Table of consonants, which IMO should also be deleted as basically useless. kwami ( talk) 11:15, 4 December 2009 (UTC) reply

Hm. But what is percussive consonant?-- VerbaGleb ( talk) 09:45, 9 July 2014 (UTC) reply

I suspect they're flapping the lips together and clattering the teeth, but don't know for sure. I've never been able to find an explanation. — kwami ( talk) 08:22, 3 August 2014 (UTC) reply