This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
The BCCI and the IPL Executive Committee has ruled that the Kocchi Tuskers will no longer be a team. Shouldn't that be reflected on the page?
This page need not read like a reading board of what all is controversial about IPL. We can have a seperate page for that. What we really need here is a table listing the winners and runners up for every year with the location, number of teams etc. Let this page look like the EPL or the NBA page please.
DLF has only been assigned sponsorship only for the tournaments for a period of 5 years. So this sponsorship isn't applicable for the entire marquee in general. Even for coming seasons,the tournament would be called DLF Indian Premier League purely for formal and sponsorship reasons. So please keep the name of the tournament as it is now. Also please do not remove entire (especially the lead section) entirely. If you have certain objections to the content please discuss it here. LeaveSleaves ( talk) 04:02, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Furthermore, Grant65 has edited away the entire sponsorship section and now those citations have been lost. Can someone retrieve them if possible. The sponsorship section is NOT in violation of Wikipedia policy because it is not flagrant self-promotion. There is, or were, citable sources for the sponsorship of the league. It is in violation of none of Wikipedia's policy. "Advertising. Articles about companies and products are written in an objective and unbiased style. Article topics must be third-party verifiable, so articles about very small "garage" or local companies are typically unacceptable. External links to commercial organizations are acceptable if they identify major organizations associated with a topic (see finishing school for an example). Wikipedia neither endorses organizations nor runs affiliate programs. See also Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) for guidelines on corporate notability. Those promoting causes or events, or issuing public service announcements, even if noncommercial, should use a forum other than Wikipedia to do so" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Advertising —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.183.241.215 ( talk) 11:59, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
Oh yes, and by the way, if you see the television rights column you will see that mentions companies and sponsorships. Looks like you didn't bother to read what it says, but was simply put off by the word sponsorship. I know the game is all about eating money these days. 20/20 is not cricket to the connoisseurs of the game. But alas, it doesn't matter what we fans of the truly beautigul game think; It's still happening. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.183.253.213 ( talk) 20:53, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
Then have you read the television part? What does SONY have to do it with? if it is not a sponsor. There is an explanation in this paragraph as to how the money is allotted. As for YOUR breach of good faith the suggestiong that I have a conflict of interest would do the same as yours. What is your intesrest in the matter? Suggest you stick to the 2020 tourney down under b/c you don't kjnow, or hear, half the matter in this regard. Have you been to India? Have you ehard a word about corporate relations in the 202? 59.183.241.156 ( talk) 13:18, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
Sony have a stake in the GOVERNANCE of the competition? Can you back up these unsubstantiated comments anywhere? Furthermore, have you what does the oofficial website and its sponsorship have to do with this? Why didn't you edit this out? 59.183.241.111 ( talk) 12:45, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
what is this? your own defintition? the fixtures are not altered by sony's demands. And if you read the what i said above, the AMOUNT coming in was directly relevant to the league. Kingfisher (not beer, btw. figure out who's sponsoring it) and Pepsi, etc have PAID for this. The passage shows where the funds go and how its directed. READ the passage first !!! 59.183.241.111 ( talk) 18:12, 27 April 2008 (UTC) Furthermore, why was the editing sealed at grant65's version of this page? If you see the edit history and discussion, I brought this into discussion while he was merely removing the section till it suited him. See above LeaveSleaves: you said "If you think that you can rewrite section in line with the Wikipedia policies, please do so, along with the citations. But do not add only information or spam links otherwise." You told me to rewrite, where's the violation? I'm showing and arguing why it is relevant. Should we simply say an unknown sponsor paid XX?? Does that make any sense? Does it make Wikipedia look professional? Or is it not a vias on the other side that sponsors are removed for the sake of it. 59.183.241.135 ( talk) 18:17, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Dear Anonymous:
"What is this? your own definition?" No, it's simply standard practice in Wikipedia to mention the owners of sports teams and broadcasters, but not sponsors.
Your attempt to show the broader relevance of the sponsors does not make sense.
"Should we simply say an unknown sponsor paid XX??" No, we should ignore the matter, as is the case with every other sports article in Wikipedia, unless the sponsorship becomes notable for some reason other than the mere fact of its fleeting existence.
"Does that make any sense?" Yes. Consider (for example) the case of sporting competitions that have dozens of sponsors. They would take up a large part of each article, would be subject to constant revision and, I suggest, no-one is interested apart from them and their cronies (breaching not only WP:ADVERT but WP:UNDUE — that something is a fact does not make it encyclopedic).
"Does it make Wikipedia look professional?" Absolutely. Much more than if we indulged the vanity and status of businesses, by including tedious lists of commercial hangers-on. This is, as I have said repeatedly, standard practice not only of Wikipedia, but any other encyclopedia you care to name, and most major media organisations.
"Or is it not a bias on the other side that sponsors are removed for the sake of it?" WP policy is certainly biased against covert advertisements masquerading as articles and undue emphasis.
I have already declared that I have no conflict of interest here. Since you have avoided more subtle questioning — and remembering that such a plethora of IP numbers can be traced with great precision — do you have a conflict of interest that you need to declare?
Grant | Talk 11:37, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Yes, inclusion of sponsors with naming rights in the first paragraph is consistent with some other articles on sporting competitions.
However, I do think that it a separate section devoted to DLF's sponsorship opens the door (again) to a dreary list of companies with no involvement in the IPL, apart from the handing over of a wad of cash. Grant | Talk 03:37, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Perhaps the squads should be removed from this page, as they are already present on the individula team pages? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.163.153.87 ( talk) 18:27, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
I have removed the Fixtures section from the article as it discusses primarily the fixtures for coming season. So please add all the relevant information in that particular article. LeaveSleaves ( talk) 05:30, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
A separate article must be created for the 2008 season. All info which can change after this season should move out of this article and into the 2008 season.For eg,if the player signings are for one year we have to move the team rosters to the respective team articles and mark it by year. The NBA article is a decent prototype. The information relating to the LEAGUE should remain on this article everything else should be moved out.this is the only way to keep articles relevant and useful. ajoy ( talk) 05:34, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Why are player costs in United States Dollars instead of Indian Rupees? 208.2.17.2 ( talk) 15:16, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
The players were auctioned for USD Hotsshot ( talk) 13:53, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Just in case anyone wants to know - I redirected "Indian Premier League Franchises" to this article since it was an exact duplicate of the "Franchises" section of this article. -- Chuq (talk) 07:11, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Please put up the logos if each of the teams too in the main article for completeness —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.145.136.1 ( talk) 08:02, 10 April 2008 (UTCItalic text)
Need to do something about the column that notes the Captains, as it is out of date - need to either label it explicitly as being the original captains, with a link to the latest, or remove it entirely. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.136.9.143 ( talk) 08:56, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
Will auctions for players be held each at the beginning of each season? If so, should this section be on the season article?? - Allied45 ( talk) 07:42, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Sohail Tanvir got sold for U$100,000. http://www.hindu.com/2008/03/12/stories/2008031256412100.htm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.92.43.51 ( talk) 08:30, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
Consistent with other articles within WikiProject Cricket it seems to make sense to refer to the national flags (whether real or derived in the case of the West Indies which I am conscious is a sporting entity rather than a political entity) rather than the flags of the constituent teams such as Jamaica or Guyana as has been the trend of some of the edits to this page. Kind regards-- Calabraxthis (talk) 17:05, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Why do you keep removing the link to cricket20 (thetwenty20cup.co.uk) from the site, we are covering the IPL but you keep removing the link
Our site is updated 24 hours a day seven days a week yet you still ink to the Official Site which hasnt been updated in a month, how does that work?
You link to cricinfo so why not cricket20?
"Cricinfo is allowed because it is one of the two go-to sources for cricket" According to who, you? cricket20 is the ONLY website dedicated to twenty20 cricket, we have covered EVERY Twenty20 game ever played in international or domestic levels. Why should you decided what links go on the page, We know we are a source for news, we know that when a Twenty20 story breaks people come to our site. I thought wikipedia was open source, allowing people to contribute and giving people fresh information not just the same old same old like linking to cricinfo. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.207.62.7 ( talk) 21:32, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Why did you remove the link to TalkTwenty20? This is the only forum that is devoted to Twenty20 cricket which provides a specific forum to discuss the IPL. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.169.54.43 ( talk) 10:32, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Shouldn't it be "IPL Mohali" and not "Mohali Twenty20 franchise"? Speedboy Salesman ( talk) 09:20, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
References
nothing about the IPL being set up in response the Indian Cricket League? 86.26.63.135 ( talk) 08:39, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
The IPL was being considered long before the ICL was established,the ICL however threatened the authority of BCCI and speeded up the establishment of the IPL Hotsshot ( talk) 13:57, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Hotsshot ( talk) 13:58, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Surely the ICL should be mentioned through. Lord Cornwallis ( talk) 03:07, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
How about removing the players list from the article. It is unnecessary as the information is already duplicated in the team articles. Instead we can have a section explaining how the auction worked, mention the bidding amount for some players and also explain how other players were selected. The list from the auctions can be moved to a separate article titled 2008 IPL player signings or something else. If there's consensus on this proposal, then I'll remove the player list. - Aksi_great ( talk) 19:01, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
I agree,a new article should be made for the teams Hotsshot ( talk) 13:59, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
The player lists are already in each of the respective team articles. There's no point in them being here or in yet more new articles. — Moondyne click! 06:34, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
I think the Pakistan cricket board section here is irrelevant as it talks about ICL only.
However, the current Shoaib Akhtar controversy can be added under this section. Vote please :)
WikiOn ( t | c ) 18:50, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Doesn't the trophy deserve special mention? It is the costliest trophy in the world, and probably the only one to have gold, diamond, ruby and yellow sapphire all together in it (mentioned by Ravi Shastri during the final game, so that airing could be used as a reference if someone slaps a citation needed). -- soum talk 19:28, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
Please upload a picture of the trophy. A section on the trophy already exists. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.169.151.130 ( talk) 14:35, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
The controversies mostly relate to the 2008 season i think it should be moved to the article on hte 2008 season .Any body disagree? ajoy ( talk) 12:34, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
This is really embrassing to say having individual world class players will not help win matches . We indians r known to cheer the players even if we dont win matches sayin he has done his job the others didnt, and it goes on and on and on . when will we become a team .Just give few months to mend these so called individual stars i will c to it that they will b better than the australians . Do the board have the guts to challenge me if s take as post of the coach is vacant so y look for a foreign coach when ther is a challenge in our own land .do u guys hear me. I will c to that we will become a great team and not GREAT INDIVIDUAL PLAYER —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
59.92.158.151 (
talk) 15:08, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.70.36.42 ( talk) 15:02, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
I think this topic can't be empty ever, you can see this year also Lalit Modi facing some trouble for not organizing match in some specific states of India and many more like Andrew Flintoff facing difficulties in joining the match.(Kush Soni 15:42, 23 February 2009 (UTC))
The stand off between BCCI and the Zee Group over the IPL-ICL situation makes me wonder - are they really doing it right? My comments may seem sarcastic or degrading for the ICL but by creating the two leagues, the BBCI and Zee have paved the way for making T20 cricket more competitive. Why cant the two groups consider the two leagues similar to the premier league and the first division in English football. The obvious options would be to have the IPL as the Premier League and the ICL as the first division - going by the quality of players on those leagues. Things like the cities linked to each club could be sorted out because it will also bring in the spirit of derbies. Two clubs from the same city would be a great treat to watch with their respective batch of fans. I suppose that the two parties will one day come to this agreement. And imagine what could have happened had they done this already. The Hyderabad team from IPL - Deccan Chargers would be in the first division (relegated) while the Hyderabad Heroes from ICL would have been in the premier league. Come on guys, please think out of the box. We want to see both the ICL and the IPL create the same hype and fun. We want both Tony Greig and Ravi Shastri do commentary for a match. We want to see SRK and Mithunda fight for supremacy in the Kolkata derby. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.70.36.42 ( talk) 15:05, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
I think other television's channel should also show matches of IPL...... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.68.79.3 ( talk) 13:09, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
Do the top players get paid $1m/year each? Or do they get paid $1m over 3 years? Tri400 ( talk) 09:51, 21 April 2009 (jokjpoiokpkopkkpiljiu
The article looks like an advertisement from Modi himself. Many experts have criticized the IPL. There should be section that covers criticism from all quarters. User:Timofeyevich ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 09:50, 19 January 2010 (UTC).
Why is the controversy part only limited to conflicts with national boards ? There are plenty of other criticisms levelled at the IPL, notably overcommercialization (DLF "maximums", Citi "moments of succcesses" etc), cheerleaders and 65 metre boundaries. Why arent these mentioned? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.231.100.52 ( talk) 21:01, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
What about the current ongoing issue? Modi.. match fixing.. betting..financial fraud etc etc ? None of this seems to be mentioned - Incase people are not aware, it looks like Modi will be removed from this post. And yet non of it is mentioned. I hope IPL is not sponsoring this page! This article seems to only show the positive spin .. as if Modi himself wrote this!
And what about the criticisms on their sponsorship phrases? "Malinga thows a pepsi full toss to Kallis. Kallis has hit it onto the coca-cola legside. They're going for a Hero-Honda single, no wait there going for a Vodafone two runs. Oh nooooo.. it looks like its a Godrej run out! And thats the end of Kallis.. And it looks like its the Max mobile time out. But wait, the camera is now pointing at that dumb MRF balloon in the air, I mean 'blimp', they sponsored the pace foundation which is responsible for all the great bowlers in india, please look at that blimp and buy MRF tyres. OK, back to the max mobile time-out" -- LogicDictates ( talk) 09:04, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
I have added current ongoing issue. -- 12afser12 ( talk) 09:04, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
the article about global following is extremely biased, ipl is not that popular internationally, in australia and england the only ppl who follow it are indian students. IPL is not a major international league —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gargabook ( talk • contribs) 01:56, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
How do you know ? Just Guessing ? SyberGod ( chat)
the article states that the average wage for players is 2.5 million pounds (6 million dollars) but says the highest paid player flintoff is paid no more than 1.5 million dollars. Biased writing from a person who is obviously way too patriotic-- Gargabook ( talk) 06:45, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
where ? SyberGod ( talk) 22:42, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
Please contribute to the above article. -- Budhajeewa ( talk) 10:55, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
I don't really know anything about the IPL (heard it mentioned and came to this article) and whilst I understand that some sort of auction for players happens, the article didn't really explain how it works. This is the sort of thing that's probably obvious to people who follow the IPL, but for someone like myself, who has never followed the sport, perhaps there could be a brief outline of how the system works. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.195.174.51 ( talk) 00:38, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Sarastro1 ( talk · contribs) 19:31, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Unfortunately, this article is a quite a long way from GA at the moment. The main reason is that there are long sections without any references, and this is a major requirement for a GA. There are also issues of broad coverage as there seem to be some things missing. I have left some general points below, but I would suggest asking for another editor to take a look and maybe copy-edit the article before renominating. Once the issues below are addressed, maybe submit the article at WP:PR for further review.
This is enough on its own for the article to fail:
<pre><span class="plainlinks">{{<ref><nowiki><span class="plainlinks"></span></ref>}}</nowiki>
'There is quite a lot missing from this article. These are just some of my suggestions
I have not considered prose or MoS too much and this should also be looked at closely before the article is renominated. When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it have it reassessed. However, I would suggest that the article needs a lot of work before re-submission. -- Sarastro1 ( talk) 21:19, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
A lot of the indian readers would probebly like to see the INR equivlent of the currency in lakh and crores. I would really like to see your thoughts on this matter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Igodspeed ( talk • contribs) 16:19, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
Some messed up with the winners of IPL seasons Please sort it out. OK I fixed it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.125.19.175 ( talk) 12:48, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
ipl — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.240.37.8 ( talk) 05:11, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Considering the importance of the main subject, the article contents need to be standardized. The article is not in a proper flow and lacks references. It also has many instances of biased content and out of heading conext contents which needs reorganization. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abksrv ( talk • contribs) 07:00, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
The given logo is the incorrect logo for the IPL. It is the shortened/acronym logo used for IPL and within the DLF/Pepsi IPL Logo. The Official Logo has a cricket player with a bat, the wordings "Indian Premier League" on the right side. The Official Website for the IPL has the official logo. Here is a link to the official IPL Logo; http://www.logoeps.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Indian-Premier-League-IPL-logo.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.173.6.122 ( talk) 17:47, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Completed --10:56, 17 August 2015 (UTC) FelixSeba7 ( talk)
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: here, here, and elsewhere online. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa ( talk) 20:53, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
I reworded the introduction, as some of it was just a series of facts. Now, it's more in line with the Wikipedia prose style.
I'm intending to look at the rest of the article, although it seems okay at a quick glance.
I think the TV rights table should list countries first, then company, as with
2015 Cricket World Cup. I'm thinking of also splitting the table into 2 tables: Current broadcasting rights (for 2015 season), and previous broadcasting rights. These will be sorted alphabetically by country name (in the case of multiple countries, by the name of the country first alphabetically), and I'll try to find a source for every current deal.
Joseph2302 (
talk) 12:47, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
Done Missing a few citations (especially on the former broadcasters), but this is a lot clearer. I remove the unclear tag from the article. Joseph2302 ( talk) 15:31, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
'The rivalry is so intense.' Could someone who knows how to Wiki clean that up perhaps? 223.219.231.26 ( talk) 15:50, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
1. test team to be excluded.
2. compensation to Indian Cricket League for patent.
3. players to represent their states/zones - North, Central, East, West, South-West, TN and South-East.
4. league format one match.
5. one game per weeknight.
ASG
106.192.28.243 ( talk) 17:18, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Indian Premier League. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:44, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Indian Premier League. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:23, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Indian Premier League has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add the logo File:Indian Premier League.svg 202.88.250.120 ( talk) 13:50, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Indian Premier League has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
My request is to change Lasith Malinga's wickets from 149 to 151. 117.197.251.117 ( talk) 07:10, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
When I am trying to edit something on this page,why its not letting me to edit? It is showing that "You need privileges (means like permission) to edit this page." Why its showing like that? Can someone help me please. Limeylen ( talk) 16:38, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
How come the 'Current Champions' field is not being displayed despite the field being present while source editing? Prat1212 ( talk) 19:04, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Indian Premier League has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Rafid2084 ( talk) 14:56, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
International broadcasters
Arab League Arab world OSN Sports (2015–2017)[84]
Bein Sports(2018-present)[93]
BeIN Sports acquire IPL rights for MENA region
https://www.insidesport.co/bein-sports-acquire-ipl-rights-mena-region-0703042018/[93]
This
edit request to
Indian Premier League has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Current Captain Rafid2084 ( talk) 12:11, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Indian Premier League has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The current champion is ambiguous and the right one is people's Chennai Super Kings(CSK). Hariwaran ( talk) 17:17, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 10:37, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Please change the most successful team as the most successful franchise in the tournament is chennai super kings with 3 tournament wins and 7 final appearances. The team also has the highest win percentage of 61.3% and have qualified to the playoffs in every IPL season they have played — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guptasuyash66 ( talk • contribs) 17:27, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Mumbai Indians(4 titles) Akshat2122 ( talk) 15:53, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Indian Premier League has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Hello, Hop you are doing good. We are local news agency from Indore. Please allow us to edit this page. We will share latest news related to ipl on this page.
Thanks & Regards Ravi Editor IPL Score Ipl2019 ( talk) 05:28, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
Hey folks, I had a bout of insomnia (Yes, I'm still awake at 8:45 in the morning), so I came across this, and decided to try to fix the copy/pasted section. I've tried to get the gist of it into the section, while avoiding the copy/paste issues. One thing I did is dropped the table, because looking at it, the average reader would not know that there were other franchises, not mentioned in the report that I could see. Any problems, please update/revert as needed. Thanks! SirFozzie ( talk) 12:45, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Indian Premier League has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
49.248.95.157 ( talk) 08:13, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
ipl stands for indian premier legue
This
edit request to
Indian Premier League has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
please change "According to BCCI, the 2015 IPL season contributed ₹12,543.5 billion to the GDP of the Indian economy." to "According to BCCI, the 2015 IPL season contributed ₹11.5 billion to the GDP of the Indian economy." 103.82.78.153 ( talk) 17:43, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 22:52, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
I think there is no reason of displaying the title sponsors with their country's flag. Arjunuws ( talk) 13:24, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Indian Premier League has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I understand the category for edit .I Will follow that category. Fade258 ( talk) 03:02, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Indian Premier League has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Current captain 155.247.51.131 ( talk) 18:15, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 09:52, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Indian Premier League has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Map of Republic of India is not in its true shape. Requested to replace it with Govt. of India's approved map of India. 218.248.0.134 ( talk) 08:40, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
{{
edit semi-protected}}
template. The north-west of India are disputed territories (I assume this is what you want included), so we do not necessarily have to follow the Indian government on this. You'd need to gain consensus to change the wikipedia standard map for India.
Spike 'em (
talk) 08:58, 14 October 2020 (UTC)@ Prolix: I have absolutely no idea what the confusion is. You asked me to provide a citation. For what?
This
edit request to
Indian Premier League has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
change 4 to 5 titles won by mumbai indians 103.41.38.187 ( talk) 08:52, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Indian Premier League has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Rishsome 28 ( talk) 11:12, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
the IPL is the most attended cricket league in the world and in 2014 *please add IT* was ranked sixth and so on
Does this deserve to be under the series of auctions? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Haris920 ( talk) 21:30, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Indian Premier League has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I want to edit something 118.107.139.130 ( talk) 10:41, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Kings XI Punjab have changed their team name to Punjab Kings. Lokesh Rahul captain of Punjab Kings, Anil Kumble head coach of Punjab Kingsma [1] KingEureka ( talk) 03:41, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
References
This
edit request to
Indian Premier League has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
RCB runners up of year 2011 not 2012 106.206.26.230 ( talk) 00:54, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Indian Premier League has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The finalists for IPL 2021 have already been decided, so can you please update that in the historical results table as well?
Also, what is the procedure to become an established editor for this page? I am an avid fan of cricket, IPL and statistics, and would love to be able to contribute to this page. Dtb8 ( talk) 16:47, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Indian Premier League has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
BobbyNohara ( talk) 03:02, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Please allow me edit
This
edit request to
Indian Premier League has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
BobbyNohara ( talk) 03:03, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
The new champions are Chennai Super Kings.
This
edit request to
Indian Premier League has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Edit: Under "Financials," add infographic/image showing detailed business model for 2019 IPL, from businessbar.net ( https://businessbar.net/all/ipl-680m-revenues-and-not-out/). This source is comprehensive and straightforward.
https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/LGL1EDafOTyGLByCX-J1mZBkOayPDxmJyAK54y0zc-FYvXQGS87ytGCCWbZZB6aGi6zrXQBODK32fSZjnB1NFh-AQO6JuV7t75PlG8Wt83bi16mehYvQhl-8tDkA4jJyjuSMsTv1 DavidESPN ( talk) 02:44, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
As a cricketer 2409:4072:701:A1C2:F857:4AB6:54C8:A4A1 ( talk) 20:31, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Can somebody fix this article? Deccan Chargers and Sunrisers Hyderabad are two different teams, but this lists both of them as same. Clog Wolf Howl 05:58, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Gujrat team before sold was called as Ahemdabad team and Punjab as Chandigarh team. Theses teams don't represent these city? Education is strength ( talk) 15:13, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Indian Premier League has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The latest edition of IPL is 2022, which is not updated on the side panel. Xoyson ( talk) 05:30, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
If not there no need to write about it in history section. WT20 challenge have its article and see also section have its wikilink, that irrelevant info should be removed. Education is strength ( talk) 13:59, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
There in no info about it in this article. News media every annum report about the viewership. IPL is a TV event in most part, so it is imp to write about it and add graphics about its viewership since it's started. If any expert editor is reading this he can work on it. Education is strength ( talk) 14:09, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
https://www.tabbiemath.com/social-impact.html
This
edit request to
Indian Premier League has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
There are a lot of grammatical mistakes in the "Controversy" section of this article.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Narayanaman ( talk • contribs)
This
edit request to
Indian Premier League has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Handscombketty ( talk) 17:47, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
All the IPL 2023 matches will be played in India. The official IPL 2023 schedule will be released by BCCI in the month of December 2022. There is a total of 74 T20 matches to be played in IPL 2023 as we know that there will be 10 teams in IPL 2023.
This
edit request to
Indian Premier League has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please rework the first two sentences, removing this:
The Indian Premier League (IPL) is a men's T20 franchise cricket league of India. It is annually contested by ten teams based out of seven Indian cities and three Indian states.
and adding this instead:
The Indian Premier League (IPL) is a men's T20 franchise cricket league in India. It is annually contested by ten teams based out of seven cities and three states.
"of India" sounds awkward (it probably doesn't belong to the Centre, and even if it does, that's not as important as the country where it's located), and since the first sentence says that it's Indian, the second sentence doesn't need to specify that the cities and states are Indian. 120.21.70.156 ( talk) 19:00, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Indian Premier League has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Aviraj20210 ( talk) 05:58, 4 March 2023 (UTC) iwant to review it
@ Spike 'em: Hi, Its ok, you can undo edits but your removing solidly sourced edits, its not right. You should raise your disagreement on this talk page. If your think all these issues are old and no need to be mentioned, then you should think again. I will not revert your edit now, to obey rules, happy editing. Rock Stone Gold Castle ( talk) 21:07, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
The Indian Premier League's mini-auction is all set to open on December 23 in Kochi with nearly 1,000 players up for grabs at the mini-auction. The IPL mini 2023 will see 714 Indian and 277 overseas players for the franchises in the T20 league to pick from. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.206.112.59 ( talk) 07:56, 3 December 2022 (UTC) Not done, Its not clear what changes you want in the article. Write in "X to Y".
The discussion is taking place at IPL controversies article that it should be merged in IPL article, you can vote your opinion there and anathor discussion about renaming that article also taking place you can vote about that on its talk page. Rock Stone Gold Castle ( talk) 07:43, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Indian Premier League has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Have to update the broadcasting channel of Sri Lanka 2402:4000:2081:1A6B:ED65:1899:A510:794F ( talk) 10:30, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Indian Premier League has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
There is a broken link that cited the rules of IPL in (48). I want to change that broken link and want to add the correct link for that statement. SporteWave123 ( talk) 07:25, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
The 3rd line say, teams are based in 7 cities and 3 states, but actually all the teams are based in 10 cities. The owners own the franchise rights in auction and then names the teams. Rock Stone Gold Castle ( talk) 13:09, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Pls add 2023 ipl season in seasons infobox Thank you 188.236.144.212 ( talk) 10:59, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
should be removed? It don't have any citation, we can verify info contain in it? Rock Stone Gold Castle ( talk) 12:04, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
7th line of the Ipl wikipedia page it is shown that The brand value of the IPL in 2019 was ₹47,500 crore (US$6.2 billion), according to Duff & Phelps. Duff and Phelps is now Kroll, LLC JCWikipedian ( talk) 04:53, 16 July 2022 (UTC) @ JCWikipedian: Please provide Refrence for this. Rock Stone Gold Castle ( talk) 14:50, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Indian Premier League has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The cited (48) is broken. Also the rules of this year IPL is changed. Please change that Link by adding another line ie. "For the 2023 season, the Indian Premier League (IPL) has announced major changes to its rules. One of the most important changes is the opportunity for teams to submit their final Playing XIs after the coin toss." [1] SporteWave123 ( talk) 07:33, 30 March 2023 (UTC) Done @ SporteWave123:, Hi, First of all stop adding your website's links, your now under scanner. WP is not the place for promotion. Disclose your association with Sportewave.com on your Userpage.
References
Broadcasting section have very old information, awaful grammar. It should be ce and its table have mis-information many places. Such as in S. Africa Super sports is airing 2023 IPL not Viacom18 Rock Stone Gold Castle ( talk) 13:03, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
I removed some uncited rows from the table, plus remv untrue data. The above sections of the table have largely outdated/historical info abt Broadcasting. Its looking like a " history section". It should be cut and selectively merge into History section. Triva info should be removed. I remember amid WPL editing you said that these broadcasting info table should be in 'season' article. This article entirely should be ce and clean-up. Rock Stone Gold Castle ( talk) 21:10, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Indian Premier League has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
change the 10 team to 12 as it has been changed 84.71.91.6 ( talk) 18:54, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
There was a consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Controversies involving the Indian Premier League to merge content from Indian Premier League controversies to this article. Would someone be willing to perform a selective merge as agreed there, bearing in mind that WP:NPOV and WP:BLPCRIME violations should not be merged? I don't want to do it, as I'm WP:INVOLVED (and my personal preference was just to delete all the content, so I don't believe I am objective enough to perform the merge). Joseph 2302 ( talk) 15:23, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Indian Premier League has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Subject: Edit Request - Please change "Most Successful Team" in Infobox from "Mumbai Indians Chennai Super Kings (5 titles each)" to "Chennai Super Kings (5 titles, 10 finals)" in the Wikipedia Page of Indian Premier League.
Dear Wikipedia Editors,
I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to request a modification to the Indian Premier League (IPL) page's infobox, specifically in the section denoting the "Most Successful Team." I believe that the current inclusion of both "Chennai Super Kings" (CSK) and "Mumbai Indians" (MI) as the most successful teams should be revised to accurately reflect the exceptional achievements of Chennai Super Kings. Therefore, I propose listing "Chennai Super Kings" as the sole "Most Successful Team" based on the following reasons:
Title Wins and Final Appearances: Both CSK and MI have secured the IPL title on five occasions, signifying their dominance in the league. However, CSK has achieved this feat with a remarkable consistency, demonstrated by their ten appearances in the final, while MI has reached the final stage six times. CSK's greater number of final appearances showcases their ability to consistently perform at the highest level, cementing their status as the most successful team in the IPL.
Overall Win Percentage: Additionally, CSK's overall win percentage stands higher than MI's, further solidifying their claim to be the most successful team. Considering the cumulative number of matches played by both teams, CSK has maintained a superior win percentage throughout their IPL journey. This statistical measure underscores CSK's sustained excellence and reinforces their position as the leading team in terms of success.
Given these compelling reasons, I kindly request the Wikipedia editors to reconsider the current representation and modify the infobox to list "Chennai Super Kings" as the sole "Most Successful Team" in the Indian Premier League page. This revision accurately reflects CSK's exceptional performances, their significant title wins, and their higher number of final appearances compared to Mumbai Indians.
I appreciate your attention to this matter and thank you in advance for considering this edit request. Please do not hesitate to reach out if any further information or clarification is needed to support this request.
Sincerely, 104.162.76.254 ( talk) 22:18, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request to
Indian Premier League has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change {{Sports Leagues of India}}
to {{Sports leagues of India}}
to fix a broken transclusion.
Alpha514 (
talk) 13:47, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
The controversies section say, both these teams was banned due to propriter & team principal was indulge in betting but it looks half reason. One line say- they was doing fixing. Editors should clear that, these teams was banned for betting or match fixing. Tesla car owner ( talk) 11:30, 31 August 2023 (UTC)