The
contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on this article (except in
limited circumstances)
Muhammad Siraj Uddin Ayaz (22 March 2018).
"The dark side of democracy". Dhaka Tribune. Archived from
the original on 22 March 2018. Retrieved 22 March 2018. That's where Cambridge Analytica comes in — a privately held company that combines data mining, data brokerage, and data analysis with strategic communication for the electoral process, to quote Wikipedia.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
computers,
computing, and
information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the
project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the
project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Has the company closed down effective of today's statement, or are they simply stating their intention to close? It seems a bit unclear at this point. Maybe we need to still refer to the company in the present until we're certain they have closed. Any thoughts?
This is Paul (
talk) 18:47, 2 May 2018 (UTC)reply
The press release issued today says the company "is immediately ceasing all operations." I'd keep it in the present tense for at least today. At some point soon the independent sources will start talking about the company in the past tense, and then we should too. --
Dr. Fleischman (
talk) 19:14, 2 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Seems sensible to do that, although it's been changed again since my previous post, so I won't bother to revert it. I must admit I'm not sure if a company ceases to exist when it announces its closure with immediate effect, or when all the relevant paperwork has been filed to wind it up.
This is Paul (
talk) 19:31, 2 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Legally speaking a company still exists after the dissolution paperwork is filed, even if operations have shut down. There are assets to be sold and creditors to pay. It can take some time. However I'd ignore the legal technicalities and focus on what the reliable independent sources say. --
Dr. Fleischman (
talk) 21:04, 2 May 2018 (UTC)reply
I don't think we can presume it's just changed name (and the register isn't a great source). Cambridge Analytica's IP belongs to the administrator.
BBC article on thisSecretlondon (
talk) 19:26, 3 May 2018 (UTC)reply
As Facebook (Meta) chooses to settle a class-action lawsuit against Cambridge Analytica, should we cite it as part of the 'Closure' section or aftermath? Or should it be included in the
Facebook–Cambridge Analytica data scandal wikipedia?
DrPronoun (
talk) 06:45, 31 August 2022 (UTC)reply
Article needs mention of the subsystem from which the data was "gleaned" (of the so-called "Facebook" data);
A desktop user`s data would have become available in most (national) jurisdictions by way of Akamai, but userdata from a mobile-telephone would have been logged by
Amdocs, if the correlation exists within that jurisdiction (servers). — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
126.161.166.182 (
talk) 20:00, 15 June 2018 (UTC)reply
X1\, the significance of the new information you added about Data Propria is unclear. From what I can tell from the sources you cited, (at least) a handful of CA's employees moved on to start DP, which is doing similar work; but we have other sources calling Emerdata CA's successor firm. Do you have any thoughts on how we can clear this up? --
Dr. Fleischman (
talk) 23:54, 18 June 2018 (UTC)reply
That makes no sense to me. I believe a company can generally only have one successor. What sourcing do we have indicating that DP is CA's successor? --
Dr. Fleischman (
talk) 05:19, 19 June 2018 (UTC)reply
@
DrFleischman: Why are you hung-up on only one successor? It was Cambridge Analytica & SCL Group, now its DP & E.
X1\ (
talk) 00:18, 20 June 2018 (UTC)reply
I'm not hung up on it. It's just that it's confusing. --
Dr. Fleischman (
talk) 05:23, 20 June 2018 (UTC)reply
Assessment of impact
This reads as a section designed to obscure. The statements "Political Scientists ...." What, all of them? Two of those referenced are journalists. What is a political scientist? Can anyone be quoted as in that category? Is a politician a political scientist? See the
Political Science page in Wikipedia and the notice in the lead. This is all from a particular perspective and not from a neutral POV,
Jacksoncowes (
talk) 18:19, 29 July 2018 (UTC)reply
Ex-CA staffers working with Republican campaigns
We should note that former CA workers are working on 2018 Republican mid-term efforts and President Donald Trump’s 2020 re-election effort.
[1]Snooganssnoogans (
talk) 13:16, 31 August 2018 (UTC)reply
I check pages listed in
Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for
orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of
Cambridge Analytica's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not.
AnomieBOT⚡ 23:42, 27 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Scandal section
I have placed a "summarize section" tag on the Scandal section, which is too long; there is already a separate article about the scandal..
Gershonmk 14:50, 11 February 2021 (UTC)reply
@Smartse The page
Facebook–Cambridge Analytica data scandal exists so the Scandal section here IMO should just be a short summary and a link to that, as this is a lot of redundancy. I'd like to replace the tag, with your consensus.
Gershonmk (
talk) 20:14, 11 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Therapy For Participants in Psychological Warfare
How are people recovering from these experiences? If you read some of the documents, it becomes clear that people were pointedly driven to even murder others for reasons that were simply the stories and experiences they were manipulated with. Is anybody offering guidance for victims of things that extreme? Do any readers have advice of places to go, for kinda deprogramming and healing, or can relate what has worked for them?
Xloem (
talk) 21:54, 14 April 2021 (UTC)reply
Naming
Bannon claimed to have named the company "Cambridge Analytica" in a video clip aired in the Netflix documentary The Great Hack (2019). Is this true?
Viriditas (
talk) 00:13, 7 June 2024 (UTC)reply