This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Should results in different countries be mentioned?
Satomi Kataoka (
talk) 14:09, 23 February 2008 (UTC)reply
I haven't looked at the info but I would imagine that could get a bit overwhelming. Saying who won by region might be more manageable, but go ahead and take a stab at whatever you'd like.
Joshdboz (
talk) 14:49, 23 February 2008 (UTC)reply
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Democrats Abroad primary, 2008. Please take a moment to review
my edit. You may add {{
cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
I have just modified 3 external links on
Democrats Abroad primary, 2008. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Moved as proposed. With respect to the comment by
User:Elliot321, I will move the pages and count on supporters of the renaming scheme to split out materials not relating to presidential primaries where those materials exist.
BD2412T 17:25, 19 June 2020 (UTC)reply
– Same as
this 3 June RM and
this 12 June RM: adding "presidential" to these article titles would provide more clarification and precision because the various U.S. states and territories also conduct primary elections for their respective state and local offices. This third RM proposal here covers those articles from 2008 and back, from whatever I could find so far as I went through all the sub-categories of
Category:United States presidential primaries. Most of the 2004 articles apparently have already been moved. There are then only a handful of 2000 and 1996 articles I spotted. Then a single 1976 one. Any articles for those elections held further back apparently have not been created yet. So unless I missed something, or they are not in one of these categories, it looks like that is it for now.
Zzyzx11 (
talk) 07:03, 13 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Support 100% per nom. Clarity and consistency are key! ...Consistency with the previous move consensus, ...consistency with the 2004 and 2020 articles, ...consistency with article titles of "
2016 Democratic presidential primaries", etc. (...
User:MisterElection2001 put it well – some party primaries for other offices "[may] warrant their own articles in the future, which makes adding qualifiers to the article titles all the more necessary.")
Paintspot Infez (
talk) 18:08, 13 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Also, pinging all participants of the previous similar move discussion (who may want to voice their opinions here as well):
Support as with previous two
Cookieo131 (
talk) 21:20, 13 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Support per each other move discussion. It's a one-word change that adds clarity. TheSavageNorwegian 22:35, 13 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Support, as other years, other primaries were held, not just presidential.--
Bob not snob (
talk) 07:55, 14 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Support, it's good with me! --
Woko Sapien (
talk) 18:18, 15 June 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment some pages, like
2008 Oregon Democratic primary, are not only about the presidential primary, but include other primaries too. In this case, we should either split up the page, keep the current name, and possibly redirect 2008 Oregon Democratic presidential primary to it. I don't have a strong opinion either way, but doing the rename without considering this could cause confusion which is against the goal here.
Elliot321 (
talk |
contribs) 15:53, 16 June 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.