( Gmelin, 1788)
The red-tailed hawk (Buteo jamaicensis) is a bird of prey that breeds throughout most of North America, from the interior of Alaska and northern Canada to as far south as Panama and the West Indies. It is one of the most common members within the genus of Buteo in North America or worldwide.  The red-tailed hawk is one of three species colloquially known in the United States as the " chickenhawk", though it rarely preys on standard-sized chickens.  The bird is sometimes also referred to as the red-tail for short, when the meaning is clear in context. Red-tailed hawks can acclimate to all the biomes within their range, occurring on the edges of non-ideal habitats such as dense forests and sandy deserts.  The red-tailed hawk occupies a wide range of habitats and altitudes including deserts, grasslands, coniferous and deciduous forests, agricultural fields and urban areas. Its latitudinal limits fall around the tree line in the Arctic and the species is absent from the high Arctic. It is legally protected in Canada, Mexico, and the United States by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act.
The 14 recognized subspecies vary in appearance and range, varying most often in color, and in the west of North America, red-tails are particularly often strongly polymorphic, with individuals ranging from almost white to nearly all black.  The subspecies Harlan's hawk (B. j. harlani) is sometimes considered a separate species (B. harlani).  The red-tailed hawk is one of the largest members of the genus Buteo, typically weighing from 690 to 1,600 g (1.5 to 3.5 lb) and measuring 45–65 cm (18–26 in) in length, with a wingspan from 110–141 cm (3 ft 7 in–4 ft 8 in). This species displays sexual dimorphism in size, with females averaging about 25% heavier than males.  
The diet of red-tailed hawks is highly variable and reflects their status as opportunistic generalists, but in North America, it is most often a predator of small mammals such as rodents. Prey that is terrestrial and diurnal is preferred so types such as ground squirrels are preferential where they naturally occur.  Large numbers of birds and reptiles can occur in the diet in several areas and can even be the primary foods. Meanwhile, amphibians, fish and invertebrates can seem rare in the hawk’s regular diet; however, they are not infrequently taken by immature hawks. Red-tailed hawks may survive on islands absent of native mammals on diets variously including invertebrates such as crabs, or lizards and birds. Like many Buteo, they hunt from a perch most often but can vary their hunting techniques where prey and habitat demand it.   Because they are so common and easily trained as capable hunters, the majority of hawks captured for falconry in the United States are red-tails. Falconers are permitted to take only passage hawks (which have left the nest, are on their own, but are less than a year old) so as to not affect the breeding population. Adults, which may be breeding or rearing chicks, may not be taken for falconry purposes and it is illegal to do so. Passage red-tailed hawks are also preferred by falconers because these younger birds have not yet developed the adult behaviors which would make them more difficult to train. 
Red-tailed hawk plumage can be variable, depending on the subspecies and the region. These color variations are morphs, and are not related to molting. The western North American population, B. j. calurus, is the most variable subspecies and has three main color morphs: light, dark, and intermediate or rufous. The dark and intermediate morphs constitute 10–20% of the population in the western United States but seem to constitute only 1–2% of B. j. calurus in western Canada.   A whitish underbelly with a dark brown band across the belly, formed by horizontal streaks in feather patterning, is present in most color variations. This feature is variable in eastern hawks and generally absent in some light subspecies (i.e. B. j. fuertesi).  Most adult red-tails have a dark brown nape and upper head which gives them a somewhat hooded appearance, while the throat can variably present a lighter brown “necklace”. Especially in younger birds, the underside may be otherwise covered with dark brown spotting and some adults may too manifest this stippling. The back is usually a slightly darker brown than elsewhere with paler scapular feathers, ranging from tawny to white, forming a variable imperfect “V” on the back. The tail of most adults, which of course gives this species its name, is rufous brick-red above with a variably sized black subterminal band and generally appears light buff-orange from below. In comparison, the typical pale immatures (i.e. less than two years old) typically have a mildly paler headed and tend to show a darker back than adults with more apparent pale wing feather edges above (for descriptions of dark morph juveniles from B. j. calurus, which is also generally apt for description of rare dark morphs of other races, see under that subspecies description). In immature red-tailed hawks of all hues, the tail is a light brown above with numerous small dark brown bars of roughly equal width, but these tend to be much broader on dark morph birds. Even in young red-tails, the tail may be a somewhat rufous tinge of brown.    The bill is relatively short and dark, in the hooked shape characteristic of raptors, and the head can sometimes appear small in size against the thick body frame.  The cere, the legs, and the feet of the red-tailed hawk are all yellow, as is the hue of bare parts in many accipitrids of different lineages.  Immature birds can be readily identified at close range by their yellowish irises. As the bird attains full maturity over the course of 3–4 years, the iris slowly darkens into a reddish-brown hue, which is the adult eye-color in all races.   Seen in flight, adults usually have dark brown along the lower edge of the wings, against a mostly pale wing, which bares light brownish barring. Individually, the underwing coverts can range from all dark to off-whitish (most often more heavily streaked with brown) which contrasts with a distinctive black patagium marking. The wing coloring of adults and immatures is similar but for typical pale morph immatures having somewhat heavier brownish markings.  
Though the markings and hue vary across the subspecies, the basic appearance of the red-tailed hawk is relatively consistent.
Overall, this species is blocky and broad in shape, often appearing (and being) heavier than other Buteos of similar length. They are the heaviest Buteos on average in eastern North America, albeit scarcely ahead of the larger winged rough-legged buzzard (Buteo lagopus), and second only in size in the west to the ferruginous hawk (Buteo regalis). Red-tailed hawks may be anywhere from the fifth to the ninth heaviest Buteo in the world depending on what figures are used. However, in the northwestern United States, ferruginous hawk females are 35% heavier than female red-tails from the same area.  On average, western red-tailed hawks are relatively longer winged and lankier proportioned but are slightly less stocky, compact and heavy than eastern red-tailed hawks in North America. Eastern hawks may also have mildly larger talons and bills than western ones. Based on comparisons of morphology and function amongst all accipitrids, these features imply that western red-tails may need to vary their hunting more frequently to on the wing as the habitat diversifies to more open situations and presumably would hunt more variable and faster prey, whereas the birds of the east, which was historically well-wooded, are more dedicated perch hunters and can take somewhat larger prey but are likely more dedicated mammal hunters.    In terms of size variation, red-tailed hawks run almost contrary to Bergmann's rule (i.e. that northern animals should be larger in relation than those closer to the Equator within a species) as one of the northernmost subspecies, B. j. alascensis, is the second smallest race based on linear dimensions and that two of the most southerly occurring races in the United States, B. j. fuertesi and B. j. umbrinus, respectively, are the largest proportioned of all red-tailed hawks.    Red-tailed hawks tend have a relatively short but broad tails and thick, chunky wings.  Although often described as long winged,   the proportional size of the wings is quite small and red-tails have high wing loading for a buteonine hawk. For comparison, two other widespread Buteo hawks in North America were found to weigh: 30 g (1.1 oz) for every square centimeter of wing area in the rough-legged buzzard (Buteo lagopus) and 44 g (1.6 oz) per square cm in the red-shouldered hawk (Buteo lineatus). In contrast, the red-tailed hawk weighed considerably more for their wing area: 199 g (7.0 oz) per square cm. 
As is the case with many raptors, the red-tailed hawk displays sexual dimorphism in size, as females are up to 25% larger than males.  As is typical in large raptors, frequently reported mean body mass for Red-tailed Hawks are somewhat higher than expansive research reveals.  Part of this weight variation is seasonal fluctuations, hawks tending to be heavier in winter than during migration or especially during the trying summer breeding season, and also due to clinal variation. Furthermore, immature hawks are usually lighter in mass than their adult counterparts despite averaging somewhat longer winged and tailed. Male red-tailed hawks may weigh from 690 to 1,300 g (1.52 to 2.87 lb) and females may weigh between 801 and 1,723 g (1.766 and 3.799 lb) (the lowest figure from a migrating female immature from Goshute Mountains, Nevada, the highest from a wintering female in Wisconsin).    Some sources claim the largest females can weigh up to 2,000 g (4.4 lb) but whether this is in reference to wild hawks (as opposed to those in captivity or used for falconry) is not clear.  The largest known survey of body mass in red-tailed hawks is still credited to Craighead & Craighead (1956), who found 100 males to average 1,028 g (2.266 lb) and 108 females to average 1,244 g (2.743 lb). However, these figures were apparently taken from labels on museum specimens, apparently from natural history collections in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, without note to the region, age or subspecies of the specimens.   However, 16 sources ranging in sample size from the aforementioned 208 specimens to only four hawks in Puerto Rico (with 9 of the 16 studies of migrating red-tails), showed that males weigh a mean of 860.2 g (1.896 lb) and females weigh a mean of 1,036.2 g (2.284 lb), about 15% lighter than prior species-wide published weights. Within the continental United States, average weights of males can range from 840.8 g (1.854 lb) (for migrating males in Chelan County, Washington) to 1,031 g (2.273 lb) (for male hawks found dead in Massachusetts) and females ranged from 1,057.9 g (2.332 lb) (migrants in the Goshutes) to 1,373 g (3.027 lb) (for females diagnosed as B. j. borealis in western Kansas).         Size variation in body mass reveals that the red-tailed hawks typically varies only a modest amount and that size differences are geographically inconsistent. Racial variation in average weights of great horned owls (Bubo virginianus) show that mean body mass is nearly twice (the heaviest race is about 36% heavier than the lightest known race on average) as variable as that of the hawk (where the heaviest race is only just over 18% heavier on average than the lightest). Also, great horned owls correspond well at the species level with Bergmann’s rule.  
Male red-tailed hawks can measure 45 to 60 cm (18 to 24 in) in total length, females measuring 48 to 65 cm (19 to 26 in) long. The wingspan typically can range from 105 to 141 cm (3 ft 5 in to 4 ft 8 in), although the largest females may possible span up to 147 cm (4 ft 10 in). In the standard scientific method of measuring wing size, the wing chord is 325.1–444.5 mm (12.80–17.50 in) long. The tail measures 188 to 258.7 mm (7.40 to 10.19 in) in length.    The exposed culmen was reported to range from 21.7 to 30.2 mm (0.85 to 1.19 in) and the tarsus averaged 74.7–95.8 mm (2.94–3.77 in) across the races.    The middle toe (excluding talon) can range from 38.3 to 53.8 mm (1.51 to 2.12 in), with the hallux-claw (the talon of the rear toe, which has evolved to be the largest in accipitrids) measuring from 24.1 to 33.6 mm (0.95 to 1.32 in) in length.  
Although they overlap in range with most other American diurnal raptors, identifying most mature red-tailed hawks to species is relatively straightforward, particularly if viewing a typical adult at a reasonable distance. The red-tailed hawk is the only North American hawk with a rufous tail and a blackish patagium marking on the leading edge of its wing (which is obscured only on dark morph adults and Harlan’s hawks by similarly dark colored feathers).  Other larger adult Buteo in North America usually have obvious distinct markings that are absent in red-tails, whether the rufous-brown “beard” of Swainson's hawks (Buteo swainsonii) or the colorful rufous belly and shoulder markings and striking black-and-white mantle of red-shouldered hawks (also the small “windows” seen at the end of their primaries).  In perched individuals, even as silhouettes, the shape of large Buteos may be distinctive, such as the wingtips overhanging the tail in several other species, but not in red-tails. North American Buteos range from the dainty, compact builds of much smaller Buteos, such as broad-winged hawk (Buteo platypterus) to the heavyset, neckless look of ferruginous hawks or the rough-legged buzzard which has a compact, smaller appearance than a red-tail in perched birds due to its small bill, short neck and much shorter tarsus, while the opposite effect occurs in flying rough-legs with their much bigger wing area.   In flight, most other large North American Buteo are distinctly longer and slenderer winged than red-tailed hawks, with the much paler ferruginous hawk having peculiarly slender wings in relation to its massive, chunky body. Swainson's hawks are distinctly darker on the wing and ferruginous hawks are much paler winged than typical red-tailed hawks. Pale morph adult ferruginous hawk can show mildly tawny-pink (but never truly rufous) upper tail, and like red-tails tend to have dark markings on underwing-coverts and can have a dark belly band but compared to red-tailed hawks have a distinctly broader head, their remiges are much whiter looking with very small dark primary tips, they lack the red-tail’s diagnostic patagial marks and usually (but not always) also lack the dark subterminal tail-band, and ferruginous have a totally feathered tarsus. With its whitish head, the ferruginous hawk is most similar to Krider's red-tailed hawks, especially in immature plumage, but the larger hawk has broader head and narrower wing shape and the ferruginous immatures are paler underneath and on their legs. Several species share a belly band with the typical red-tailed hawk but they vary from subtle (as in the ferruginous hawk) to solid blackish, the latter in most light-morph rough-legged buzzards.   More difficult to identify among adult red-tails are its darkest variations, as most species of Buteo in North America also have dark morphs. Western dark morph red-tails (i.e. calurus) adults, however, retain the typical distinctive brick-red tail which other species lack, which may stand out even more against the otherwise all chocolate brown-black bird. Standard pale juveniles when perched show a whitish patch in the outer half of the upper surface of the wing which other juvenile Buteo lack.  The most difficult to identify stages and plumage types are dark morph juveniles, Harlan’s hawk and some Krider’s hawks (the latter mainly with typical ferruginous hawks as aforementioned). Some darker juveniles are similar enough to other Buteo juveniles that it has been stated that they "cannot be identified to species with any confidence under various field conditions."   However, field identification techniques have advanced in the last few decades and most experienced hawk-watchers can distinguish even the most vexingly plumaged immature hawks, especially as the wing shapes of each species becomes apparent after seeing many. Harlan’s hawks are most similar to dark morph rough-legged buzzards and dark morph ferruginous hawks. Wing shape is the most reliable identification tool for distinguishing the Harlan’s from these, but also the pale streaking on the breast of Harlan’s, which tends to be conspicuous in most individuals, and is lacking in the other hawks. Also dark morph ferruginous hawks do not have the dark subterminal band of a Harlan’s hawk but do bear a black undertail covert lacking in Harlan’s.  
The red-tailed hawk is a member of the subfamily Buteoninae which includes about 55 currently recognized species.   Unlike many lineages of accipitrid, which seemed to have radiated out of Africa or south Asia, the Buteoninae clearly originated in the Americas based on fossil records and current species distributions (more than 75% of the extant hawks from this lineage are found in the Americas).   As a subfamily, the Buteoninae seem to be rather old based on genetic materials, with monophyletic genera baring several million years of individual evolution. Diverse in plumage appearance, habitat, prey and nesting preferences, buteonine hawks are nonetheless typically medium to large sized hawks with ample wings (while some fossil forms are very large, larger than any eagle alive today).    The red-tailed hawk is a member of the genus Buteo, a group of medium-sized raptors with robust bodies and broad wings. Members of this genus are known as buzzards in Eurasia, but hawks in North America.  Under current classification, the genus includes approximately 28 species, the second most diverse of all extant accipitrid genera behind only Accipiter. The buzzards of Eurasia and Africa are mostly part of the genus Buteo, although two other small genera within the subfamily Buteoninae occur in Africa.   
At one time, the rufous-tailed hawk (Buteo ventralis), distributed in Patagonia and some other areas of southern South America, was considered part of the red-tailed hawk species. With a massive distributional gap consisting of the majority of South America, the rufous-tailed hawk is considered a separate species now but the two hawks still compromise a “species pair” or superspecies, as they are clearly closely related. The rufous-tailed hawk, while comparatively little studied, is very similar to the red-tailed hawk, being about the same size in body mass and possessing the same wing structure, and having more or less parallel nesting and hunting habits. Physically, however, rufous-tailed hawk adults do not attain a bright brick-red tail as do red-tailed hawks, instead retaining a dark brownish-cinnamon tail with many blackish crossbars similar to juvenile red-tailed hawks.    Another, more well-known, close relative to the red-tailed hawk is the common buzzard (Buteo buteo), which has been considered as its Eurasian “ broad ecological counterpart” and may too be within a species complex with red-tailed hawk. The common buzzard, in turn, is also part of a species complex with other Old World buzzards, namely the mountain buzzard (Buteo oreophilus), the forest buzzard (Buteo trizonatus ) and the Madagascar buzzard (Buteo brachypterus).    All six species in the alleged species complex, although varying notably in size and plumage characteristics, that houses red-tailed hawk share with it the feature of the blackish patagium marking, which is missing in most other Buteos.  
There may be at least 14 recognized subspecies of Buteo jamaicensis, which vary in range and in coloration. However, not all authors accept every subspecies, particularly some of the insular races of the tropics (which differ only slightly in some cases from the nearest mainland forms) and particularly the Krider’s hawks, by far the most controversial red-tailed hawk race as few authors agree on its suitability as a full-fledged subspecies.   
- Jamaican red-tailed hawk (B. j. jamaicensis), the nominate subspecies, occurs in the northern West Indies, including Jamaica, Hispaniola, Puerto Rico and the Lesser Antilles but not the Bahamas or Cuba.
- Alaska red-tailed hawk (B. j. alascensis) breeds (probably resident) from southeastern coastal Alaska to the Queen Charlotte Islands and Vancouver Island in British Columbia.
- Eastern red-tailed hawk (B. j. borealis) breeds from southeast Canada and Maine south through Texas and east to northern Florida.
- Western red-tailed hawk (B. j. calurus) seems to have the greatest longitudinal breeding distribution of any race of red-tailed hawk.
- Central American red-tailed hawk (B. j. costaricensis) is resident from Nicaragua to Panama.
- Southwestern red-tailed hawk (B. j. fuertesi) breeds from northern Chihuahua to southern Texas.
- Tres Marias red-tailed hawk (B. j. fumosus) is endemic to Islas Marías, Mexico.
- Mexican Highlands red-tailed hawk (B. j. hadropus) is native to the Mexican Highlands.
- Harlan's hawk (B. j. harlani) breeds from central Alaska to northwestern Canada, with the largest number of birds breeding in the Yukon or western Alaska, reaching their southern limit in north-central British Columbia.
- Red-tailed hawk kemsiesi (B. j. kemsiesi) is a dark subspecies resident from Chiapas, Mexico to Nicaragua.
- Krider's hawk (B. j. kriderii) breeds from southern Alberta, southern Saskatchewan, southern Manitoba, and extreme western Ontario south to south-central Montana, Wyoming, western Nebraska, and western Minnesota.
- Socorro red-tailed hawk (B. j. socorroensis) is endemic to Socorro Island, Mexico.
- Cuban red-tailed hawk (B. j. solitudinis) is native to the Bahamas and Cuba.
- Florida red-tailed hawk (B. j. umbrinus) occurs year-round in peninsular Florida north to as far Tampa Bay and the Kissimmee Prairie south throughout the rest of peninsular Florida down to the Florida Keys.
The red-tailed hawk is one of the most widely distributed of all raptors in the Americas. It occupies the largest breeding range of any diurnal raptor north of the Mexican border, just ahead of the American kestrel (Falco sparverius). While the peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus) has a greater latitudinal distribution as a nester in North America, its range as a breeding species is far more sporadic and sparse than that of red-tailed hawks.  The red-tailed hawk breeds from nearly north-central Alaska, the Yukon, and a considerable portion of the Northwest Territories, there reaching as far as a breeder as Inuvik, Mackenzie river Delta and skirting the southern shores of Great Bear Lake and Great Slave Lake. Thereafter in northern Canada, breeding red-tails continue to northern Saskatchewan and across to north-central Ontario east to central Quebec and the Maritime Provinces of Canada, and south continuously to Florida. There are no substantial gaps throughout the entire contiguous United States where breeding red-tailed hawks do not occur. Along the Pacific, their range includes all of Baja California, including Islas Marías, and Socorro Island in the Revillagigedo Islands. On the mainland, breeding red-tails are found continuously to Oaxaca, then experience a brief gap at the Isthmus of Tehuantepec thereafter subsequently continuing from Chiapas through central Guatemala on to north Nicaragua. To the south, the population in highlands from Costa Rica to central Panama is isolated from breeding birds in Nicaragua. Further east, breeding red-tailed hawks occur in the West Indies in north Bahamas (i.e. Grand Bahama, Abaco and Andros) and all larger islands (such as Cuba, Jamaica, Hispaniola and Puerto Rico) and into the northern Lesser Antilles ( Virgin Islands, Saint Barthélemy, Saba, Saint Kitts and Nevis, being rare as a resident on Saint Eustatius and are probably extinct on Saint Martin). The typical winter range stretches from southern Canada south throughout the remainder of the breeding range.   
Red-tailed hawks have shown the ability to become habituated to almost any habitat present in North and Central America. Their preferred habitat is mixed forest and field, with trees or alternately high bluffs that may be used as nesting and perching sites. It occupies a wide range of habitats and altitudes, including deserts, grasslands, nearly any coastal or wetland habitat, mountains, foothills, coniferous and deciduous woodlands and tropical rainforests. Agricultural fields and pasture which are more often than not varied with groves, bluffs or streamside trees in most parts of America may make nearly ideal habitat for breeding or wintering red-tails.     Some red-tails may survive or even flourish in urban areas.  One famous urban red-tailed hawk, known as " Pale Male", became the subject of a non-fiction book, Red-Tails in Love: A Wildlife Drama in Central Park, and is the first known red-tail in decades to successfully nest and raise young in the crowded New York City borough of Manhattan.     As studied in Syracuse, New York, the Highway system has been very beneficial to red-tails as it juxtaposed trees and open areas, blocks human encroachment with fences, with the red-tailed hawks easily becoming acclimated to car traffic. The only practice which has a negative effect on the highway-occupying red-tails is the planting of exotic Phragmites, which may occasionally obscure otherwise ideal highway habitat. 
In the northern Great Plains, the widespread practices of wildfire suppression and planting of exotic trees by humans has allowed groves of aspen and various other trees to invade what was once vast, almost continuous grasslands, causing grassland obligates like ferruginous hawks to decline and allowing parkland-favoring red-tails to flourish.   To the contrary, clear-cutting of mature woodlands in New England, resulting in only fragmented and isolated stands of trees or low second growth remaining, was recorded to also benefit red-tailed hawks, despite being to the determent of breeding red-shouldered hawks.  The red-tailed hawk, as a whole, is second only to the peregrine falcon and the great horned owl amongst raptorial birds in terms of the use of diverse habitats in North America.   Beyond the high Arctic (as they discontinuous as a breeder at the tree line), there are few other areas where red-tailed hawks are absent or rare in North and Central America. Some areas of unbroken forest, especially lowland tropical forests, rarely host red-tailed hawks although they can occupy forested tropical highlands surprisingly well. In deserts, they can only occur where there is some variety of arborescent growth or ample rocky bluffs.   
The red-tailed hawk is a bird that is highly conspicuous to humans in much of its daily behavior. Most birds in resident populations, which are well more than half of all red-tailed hawks, usually split non-breeding season activity between territorial soaring flight and sitting on a perch. Often perching is for hunting purposes, but many will sit on a tree branch for hours, occasionally stretching on a single wing or leg to keep limber, with no signs of hunting intent.    Wintering typical pale-morph hawks in Arkansas were found to perch in open areas near the top of tall, isolated trees, whereas dark morphs more frequently perched in dense groups of trees.  For many, and perhaps most, red-tailed hawks being mobbed by various birds is a daily concern and can effectively disrupt many of their daily behaviors. Mostly larger passerines, of multiple families from tyrant flycatchers to icterids, will mob red-tails, despite that other raptors such as Accipiter hawks and falcons are a notably greater danger to them.   The most aggressive and dangerous attacker as such is likely to be various crows or other corvids, i.e. American crows (Corvus brachyrhynchos), due to the fact that a mobbing group (or “murder”) of them can number up to as many as 75 crows, which may cause grievous physical harm to a solitary hawk and, if the hawks are nesting, separate the parent hawks and endanger the eggs or nestlings within their nest to predation by the murder of crows.   However, evidence has shown that birds that mob red-tailed hawks can tell how distended the hawk's crop is (i.e. the upper chest and throat area being puffy versus flat-feathered and sleek) and thus mob more often when the hawk is presumably about to hunt. 
In flight, this hawk soars with wings often in a slight dihedral, flapping as little as possible to conserve energy. Soaring is by far the most efficient method of flight for red-tailed hawks and is used more often than not.  Active flight is slow and deliberate, with deep wing beats. Wing beats are somewhat less rapid in active flight than in most other Buteo hawks, even heavier species such as ferruginous hawks tend to flap more swiftly, due to the morphology of the wings.  In wind, it occasionally hovers on beating wings and remains stationary above the ground, but this flight method is rarely employed by this species.   When soaring or flapping its wings, it typically travels from 32 to 64 km/h (20 to 40 mph), but when diving may exceed 190 km/h (120 mph).  Although North American red-tailed hawks will occasionally hunt from flight, a great majority of flight by red-tails in this area is for non-hunting purpose.  During nest defense, red-tailed hawks may be capable of surprisingly swift, vigorous flight while repeatedly diving at perceived threats. 
The cry of the red-tailed hawk is a two to three second hoarse, rasping scream, variously transcribed as kree-eee-ar, tsee-eeee-arrr or sheeeeee,  that begins at a high pitch and slurs downward.    This cry is often described as sounding similar to a steam whistle.   The red-tailed hawk frequently vocalizes while hunting or soaring, but vocalizes loudest and most persistently in defiance or anger, in response to a predator or a rival hawk's intrusion into its territory.   At close range, it makes a croaking guh-runk, possibly as a warning sound.  Nestlings may give peeping notes with a "soft sleepy quality" that give way to occasional screams as they develop, but those are more likely a soft whistle than the harsh screams of the adults. Their latter hunger call, given anywhere from 11 days (as recorded in Alaska) to post-fledgling (in California), is different, a two syllabled, wailing klee-uk food cry exerted by the young when parents leave the nest or enter their field of vision.   A strange mechanical sound "not very unlike the rush of distant water" has been reported as uttered in the midst of a sky-dance.  A modified call of chirp-chwirk is given during courtship while a low key, duck-like nasal gank may be given by pairs when they are relaxed.  The fierce, screaming cry of the red-tailed hawk is frequently used as a generic raptor sound effect in television shows and other media, even if the bird featured is not a red-tailed hawk.   It is especially used in depictions of the bald eagle.
Red-tailed hawks are considered partial migrants, as in about the northern-third of their distribution, which is most of their range in Canada and Alaska, they almost entirely vacate their breeding grounds.   In coastal areas of the north, however, such as in the Pacific northwest up to southern Alaska and in Nova Scotia on the Atlantic, red-tailed hawks do not usually migrate.  More or less, any area where snow cover is nearly continuous during the winter months will show an extended absence of most red-tailed hawks, so some areas as far south as Montana may show strong seasonal vacancies of red-tails.  In southern Michigan immature red-tailed hawks tended to remain in winter only when voles were abundant. During relatively long harsh winters up in Michigan, many more young ones were reported in northeastern Mexico.   To the opposite extreme, hawks residing as far north as Fairbanks in Alaska may persevere through the winter on their home territory, as was recorded with one male over three consecutive years.  Birds of any age tend to be territorial during winter but may shift ranges whenever food requirements demand it.  Wintering birds tend to perch on inconspicuous tree perches, seeking shelter especially if they have a full crop or are in the midst of poor or overly windy weather. Adult wintering red-tails tend to perch more prominently than immatures do, which select lower or more secluded perches. Immatures are often missed in winter bird counts, unless they are being displaced by dominant adults. Generally though, immatures can seem to recognize that they are less likely to be attacked by adults during winter and can perch surprisingly close to them. Age is the most significant consideration of wintering hawks’ hierarchy but size does factor in, as larger immatures (presumably usually females) are less likely to displaced than smaller ones.    Dark adult red-tailed hawks appear to be harder to locate when perched than other red-tails. In Oklahoma, for example, wintering adult Harlan's hawks were rarely engaged in fights or chased by other red-tails. These Harlan's tended to gather in regional pockets and frequently the same Harlan’s occurred year-to-year.  In general, migratory behavior is complex and reliant on each individual hawks’ decision-making (i.e. whether prey populations are sufficient enough to entice the hawk to endure prolonged snow cover).  During fall migration, departure may occur as soon as late September but peak movements occur in late October and the full month of November in the United States, with migration ceasing after mid-December. The northernmost migrants may pass over resident red-tailed hawks in the contiguous United States while the latter are still in the midst of brooding fledglings.  Not infrequently several autumn hawk-watches in Ontario, Quebec and the northern United States will record 4,500–8,900 red-tailed hawks migrating through each fall, with records of up to 15,000 in a season at Hawk Ridge hawk watch in Duluth, Minnesota.   Unlike some other Buteos, such as Swainson's hawks and broad-winged hawks (Buteo platypterus), red-tailed hawks do not usually migrate in groups, instead passing by one-by-one, and will only migrate on days when winds are favorable.   Most migrants do not go past southern Mexico in late autumn, but a few may annually move down as far as to roughly as far as there are breeding red-tailed hawks down in Panama. However, there are now a few records of wintering migrant red-tails turning up in Colombia, the first records of the species in that country or anywhere in South America.    Spring northward movements may commence as early as late February, with peak numbers usually occurring in late March and early April. Seasonal counts may include up to 19,000 red-tails in spring at Derby Hill hawk watch, in Oswego, New York, sometimes more than 5,000 are recorded in a day there.   The very most northerly migratory individuals may not reach breeding grounds until June, even adults.  
Immature hawks migrate later than adults in spring on average but not, generally speaking, in autumn. In the northern Great Lakes, immatures return in late May to early June, when adults are already well into their nesting season and must find unoccupied ranges.  However, in Alaska adults tend to migrate before immatures in early to mid-September, to the contrary of other areas, probably as heavy snow fall begins.   Yearlings that were banded in southwestern Idaho stayed for about 2 months after fledging, and then traveled long distances with a strong directional bias, with 9 of 12 recovered southeast of the study area- six of these moved down to coastal lowlands in Mexico and down to as far as Guatemala, here 4,205 km (2,613 mi) from their initial banding.  In California, 35 hawks were banded as nestlings, 26 were recovered at less than 50 miles away, with multi-directional juvenile dispersals. Nestlings banded in southern California sometimes actually traveled up to as far as 1,190 km (740 mi) north to Oregon ranging to the opposite extreme as far as a banded bird from the Sierra Nevadas that moved 1,700 km (1,100 mi) south to Sinaloa.   Nestlings banded in Green County, Wisconsin did not travel very far comparatively by October–November, but just a month later in December recoveries were found in varied states including Illinois, Iowa, Texas, Louisiana and Florida. 
The red-tailed hawk is carnivorous, and a highly opportunistic feeder. It is said that nearly any small animal they encounter may be viewed as potential food.  Their most common prey are small mammals such as rodents and lagomorphs, but they will also consume birds, reptiles, fish, amphibians and invertebrates. Prey varies considerably with regional and seasonal availability, but usually centers on rodents, accounting for up to 85% of a hawk's diet.  In total nearly 500 prey species have been recorded in their diet, almost as many as the great horned owl have been recorded as taking.     When 27 North American studies are reviewed, mammals make up 65.3% of the diet by frequency, 20.9% by birds, 10.8% by reptiles, 2.8% by invertebrates and 0.2% by amphibians and fish.     The geometric mean body mass of prey taken by red-tailed hawks in North America averages about 187 g (6.6 oz) based on a pair of compilation studies from across the continent, regionally varying at least from 43.4 to 361.4 g (1.53 to 12.75 oz).   Staple prey (excluding invertebrates) has been claimed to weigh from 15 to 2,114 g (0.033 to 4.661 lb), ranging roughly from the size of a small mouse or lizard to the size of a black-tailed jackrabbit (Lepus californicus).    The daily food requirements range from 7 to 11.2% of their own body weight, so that about three voles or an individual prey of equivalent weight are required daily for an average range adult. 
The talons and feet of red-tailed hawks are relatively large for a Buteo hawk, in an average sized adult red-tail the “hallux-claw” or rear talon, the largest claw on all accipitrids, averages about 29.7 mm (1.17 in).   In fact, the talons of red-tails in some areas averaged of similar size to those of ferruginous hawks which can be considerably heavier and notably larger than those of the only slightly lighter Swainson's hawk.    This species may exert an average of about 91 kg (201 lb) of pressure per square inch (PSI) through its feet.    Owing to its morphology, red-tailed hawks generally can attack larger prey than other Buteo hawks typically can and are capable of selecting the largest prey of up to their own size available at the time that they are hunting, though in all likelihood numerically most prey probably weighs about 20% of the hawk's own weight (as is typical of many birds of prey).    Red-tailed hawks usually hunt by watching for prey activity from a high perch, also known as still hunting. Upon being spotted, prey is dropped down upon by the hawk. Red-tails often select the highest available perches within a given environment since the greater the height they are at, the less flapping is required and the faster the downward glide they can attain toward nearby prey. If prey is closer than average, the hawk may glide at a steep downward angle with few flaps, if farther than average, it may flap a few swift wingbeats alternating with glides. Perch hunting is the most successful hunting method generally speaking for red-tailed hawks and can account for up to 83% of their daily activities (i.e. in winter).    Wintering pairs may hunt together and aseasonally may join together to group hunt agile prey that they may have trouble catching by themselves, such as tree squirrels. This may consist of stalking opposites sides of a tree, in order to surround the squirrel and almost inevitably drive the rodent to be captured by one after being flushed by the other hawk.  
The most common flighted hunting method for red-tail is to cruise approximately 10 to 50 m (33 to 164 ft) over the ground with flap-and-glide type flight, interspersed occasionally with harrier-like quarters over the ground. This method is less successful than perch hunting but seems relatively useful for capturing small birds and may be show the best results while hunting in hilly country.    Hunting red-tailed hawks readily will use trees, bushes or rocks for concealment before making a surprise attack, even showing a partial ability to dodge among trees in an Accipiter-like fashion. Among thick stands of spruce in Alaska, a dodging hunting flight was thought to be unusually important to red-tails living in extensive areas of conifers, with hawks even coming to the ground and walking hurriedly in prey pursuit especially if the prey was large, a similar behavior to goshawks.   Additional surprisingly swift aerial hunting has reported in red-tails who habitually hunt bats in Texas. Here the bat-hunting specialists would stoop with half-close wings, quite falcon-like, plowing through the huge stream of bats exiting their cave roosts, then zooming upwards with a bat in its talons. These hawks would also fly parallel closely to the stream, then veer sharply into it and seize a bat.    In the neotropics, red-tails have shown the ability to dodge amongst forest canopy whilst hunting.   In Kansas, red-tailed hawks were recorded sailing to catch flying insects, a hunting method more typical of a Swainson's hawk.  Alternately, they may drop to the ground to forage for insects like grasshoppers and beetles as well as other invertebrates and probably amphibians and fish (except by water in the latter cases). Hunting afoot seems to be particularly prevalent among immatures. Young red-tailed hawks in northeastern Florida were recorded often extracting earthworms from near the surface of the ground and some had a crop full of earthworms after rains. Ground hunting is also quite common on Socorro Island, where there are no native land mammals and invertebrates are more significant to their overall diet.    A red-tailed hawk was observed to incorporate an unconventional killing method which was drowning a heron immediately after capture.  One red-tailed hawk was seen to try to grab a young ground squirrel and, upon missing it, screamed loudly, which in turn caused another young squirrel to break into a run wherein it was captured. Whether this was an intentional hunting technique needs investigation.  Upon capture, smaller prey is taken to a feeding perch, which is almost always lower than a hunting perch. Among small prey, rodents are often swallowed whole as are shrews and small snakes, while birds are plucked and beheaded. Even prey as small as chipmunks may take two to three bites to consume. Larger mammals of transportable size are at times beheaded and have part of their fur discarded, then leftovers are either stored in a tree or fall to the ground. Large prey, especially if too heavy to transport on the wing, is often dragged to a secluded spot and dismantled in various ways. If they can successfully carry what remains to a low perch, they tend to feed until full and then discard the rest.   
Rodents are certainly the type of prey taken most often by frequency but their contribution to prey biomass at nests can be regionally low, and the type, variety and importance of rodent prey can be highly variable. In total, well over 100 rodent species have turned up the diet of red-tailed hawks.    Rodents of extremely varied sizes may be hunted by red-tails, with species ranging in size from the 8.2 g (0.29 oz) eastern harvest mouse (Reithrodontomys humulis) to marmots (Marmota ssp.), weighing some 3,300 g (7.3 lb) in spring, although whether they can take full grown marmots is questionable. At least some attacks on adult marmots like groundhogs (Marmota monax) are abortive.    At times, the red-tailed hawk is thought of as a semi-specialized vole-catcher, but voles are a subsistence food that are more or less are taken until larger prey can be captured. In an area of Michigan, immature hawks took almost entirely voles but adults were diversified feeders.   Indeed, the 44.1 g (1.56 oz) meadow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus) was the highest frequency prey species in 27 dietary studies across North America, accounting for up to 54% of the food at nests by frequency. It is quite rare for any one species to make up more than half of the food at any dietary study for red-tailed hawks.       In total about 9 Microtus species are known in the overall diet, with 5 other voles and lemmings known to be included in their prey spectrum.   Another well-represented species was the 27.9 g (0.98 oz) prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster), which were the primary food, making up 26.4% of a sample of 1322, in eastern Kansas.  While crepuscular in primary feeding activity, voles are known to be active both day and night, and so are reliable food for hawks than most non-squirrel rodents, which generally are nocturnal in activity.    Indeed, most other microtine rodents are largely inaccessible to red-tailed hawks due to their strongly nocturnal foraging patterns, even though 24 species outside of voles and lemmings are known to be hunted. Woodrats are taken as important supplemental prey in some regions, being considerably larger than most other crictetid rodents, and some numbers of North American deermouse (Peromyscus maniculatus) may turn up. The largest representation of the latter species was contributing 11.9% of the diet in the Great Basin of Utah, making them the second best represented prey species there.   Considering this limited association with nocturnal rodents, the high importance of pocket gophers in the diet of red-tailed hawks is puzzling to many biologists, as these tend to be highly nocturnal and elusive by day, rarely leaving the confines of their burrow. At least 8 species of pocket gopher are included in the prey spectrum (not to mention 5 species of pocket mice). The 110 g (3.9 oz) northern pocket gopher (Thomomys talpoides) is particularly often reported and, by frequency, even turns up as the third most often recorded prey species in 27 American dietary studies. Presumably, hunting of pocket gophers by red-tails, which has possibly never been witnessed, occurs in dim light at first dawn and last light of dusk when they luck upon a gopher out foraging.     
By far, the most important prey among rodents are squirrels, as they are almost fully diurnal. All told, nearly 50 species from the squirrel family have turned up as food. In particular, where they are distributed, ground squirrels are doubly attractive as a primary food source due to their ground dwelling habits, as red-tails prefer to attack prey that is terrestrial.     There are also many disadvantages to ground squirrels as prey: they can escape quickly to the security of their burrows, they tend to be highly social and they are very effective and fast in response to alarm calls, and a good deal of species enter hibernation that in the coldest climates can range up to a 6 to 9-month period (although those in warmer climates with little to no snowy weather often have brief dormancy and no true hibernation). Nonetheless, red-tailed hawks are devoted predators of ground squirrels, especially catching incautious ones as they go out foraging (which more often than not are younger animals).     A multi-year study conducted on San Joaquin Experimental Range in California, seemingly still the largest food study to date done for red-tailed hawks with 4031 items examined, showed that throughout the seasons the 722 g (1.592 lb) California ground squirrel (Otospermophilus beecheyi) was the most significant prey, accounting for 60.8% of the breeding season diet and about 27.2% of the diet for hawks year-around. Because of the extremely high density of red-tailed hawks on this range, some pairs came to specialize on diverse alternate prey, which consisted variously of kangaroo rats, lizards, snakes or chipmunks. One pair apparently lessened competition by focusing on pocket gophers instead despite being near the center of ground squirrel activity.   In Snake River NCA, the primary food of red-tailed hawks was the 203.5 g (7.18 oz) Townsend's ground squirrel (Urocitellus townsendii), which made up nearly 21% of the food in 382 prey items across several years despite sharp spikes and crashes of the ground squirrel population there.   The same species was the main food of red-tailed hawks in southeastern Washington, making up 31.2% of 170 items.  An even closer predatory relationship was reported in the Centennial valley of Montana and south-central Montana, where 45.4% of 194 prey items and 40.2% of 261 items, respectively, of the food of red-tails consisted of the 455.7 g (1.005 lb) Richardson's ground squirrel (Urocitellus richardsonii).    Locally in Rochester, Alberta, Richardson's ground squirrel, estimated to average 444 g (15.7 oz), were secondary in number to unidentified small rodents but red-tails in the region killed an estimated 22–60% of the area’s ground squirrel, a large dent in the squirrel’s population.  Further east, ground squirrels are not so reliably distributed, but one study in southern Wisconsin, in one of several quite different dietary studies in that state, the 172.7 g (6.09 oz) thirteen-lined ground squirrel (Ictidomys tridecemlineatus) was the main prey species, making up 29.7% of the diet (from a sample of 165).  
In Kluane Lake, Yukon, 750 g (1.65 lb) Arctic ground squirrels (Spermophilus parryii) were the main overall food for Harlan’s red-tailed hawks, making up 30.8% of a sample of 1074 prey items. When these ground squirrels enter their long hibernation, the breeding Harlan’s hawks migrate south for the winter.  Nearly as important in Kluane Lake was the 200 g (7.1 oz) American red squirrel (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus), which constituted 29.8% of the above sample. Red squirrels are highly agile dwellers on dense spruce stands, which has caused biologists to ponder how the red-tailed hawks are able to routinely catch them. It is possible that the hawks catch them on the ground such as when squirrels are digging their caches, but theoretically the dark color of the Harlan’s hawks may allow them to more effectively ambush the squirrels within the forests locally.    While American red squirrel turn up not infrequently as supplementary prey elsewhere in North America, other tree squirrels seem to be comparatively infrequently caught, at least during the summer breeding season. It is known that pairs of red-tailed hawks will cooperative hunt tree squirrels at times, probably mostly between late fall and early spring. Fox squirrels (Sciurus niger), the largest of North America’s tree squirrels at 800 g (1.8 lb), are fairly regular supplemental prey but the lighter, presumably more agile 533 g (1.175 lb) eastern gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis) appears to be seldom caught based on dietary studies.      While adult marmot may be difficult for red-tailed hawks to catch, young marmots are readily taken in numbers after weaning, such as a high frequency of yellow-bellied marmot (Marmota flaviventris) in Boulder, Colorado.  Another grouping of squirrels but at the opposite end of the size spectrum for squirrels, the chipmunks are also mostly supplemental prey but are considered more easily caught than tree squirrels, considering that they are more habitual terrestrial foragers.    In central Ohio, eastern chipmunks (Tamias striatus), the largest species of chipmunk at an average weight of 96 g (3.4 oz), were actually the leading prey by number, making up 12.3% of a sample of 179 items.  
Outside of rodents, the most important prey for North American red-tailed hawks is rabbits and hares, of which at least 13 species are included in their prey spectrum. By biomass and reproductive success within populations, these are certain to be the most significant food source to the species (at least in North America).   Adult Sylvilagus rabbits known to be hunted by red-tails can range from the 700 g (1.5 lb) brush rabbit (Sylvilagus bachmani) to the Tres Marias rabbit (Sylvilagus graysoni) at 1,470 g (3.24 lb) while all leporids hunted may range the 421.3 g (14.86 oz) pygmy rabbit (Brachylagus idahoensis) to hares and jackrabbits potentially up twice the hawk’s own weight.     While primarily crepuscular in peak activity, rabbits and hares often foraging both during day and night and so face almost constant predatory pressure from a diverse range of predators. Male red-tailed hawks or pairs which are talented rabbit hunters are likely have higher than average productivity due to the size and nutrition of the meal ensuring healthy, fast-growing offspring.     Most widely reported are the cottontails, which the three most common North America varieties softly grading into mostly allopatric ranges, being largely segregated by habitat preferences where they overlap in distribution. Namely, in descending order of reportage were: the eastern cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus), the second most widely reported prey species overall in North America and with maximum percentage known in a given study was 26.4% in Oklahoma (out of 958 prey items), the mountain cottontail (Sylvilagus nuttallii), maximum representation being 17.6% out of a sample of 478 in Kaibab Plateau, Arizona and the desert cottontail (Sylvilagus audubonii), maximum representation being 22.4% out of a sample of 326 in west-central Arizona.     Black-tailed jackrabbits (Lepus californicus) are even more intensely focused upon as a food source by the hawks found in the west, particularly the Great Basin. This species is likely the largest prey routinely hunted by red-tails and the mean prey size where jackrabbits are primarily hunted is indeed the highest known overall in the species. When jackrabbit numbers crash, red-tailed hawk productivity tends to decline synchronically. In northern Utah, black-tailed jackrabbits made up 55.3% by number of a sample of 329. Elsewhere, they are usually somewhat secondary by number. Mean sizes of jackrabbits taken can range up to approximately 2,114 g (4.661 lb), but probably quantitatively mostly juvenile and yearling jackrabbits are caught. Prime adult jackrabbits, with weights at times exceeding 2,700 g (6.0 lb), are difficult and taken infrequently, short of by particularly large and aggressive female red-tails.     Other even larger species are sometimes taken as prey such as the white-tailed jackrabbit (Lepus townsendii), but whether this includes healthy adults, as they average over 3,200 g (7.1 lb), is unclear. 
In the boreal forests of Canada and Alaska, red-tails are fairly dependent on the snowshoe hare (Lepus americanus), falling somewhere behind the great horned owl and ahead of the northern goshawk in their regional reliance on this food source.    The hunting preferences of red-tails who rely on snowshoe hares is variable. In Rochester, Alberta, 52% of snowshoe hares caught were adults, such prey estimated to average 1,287 g (2.837 lb), and adults, in some years, were six times more often taken than juvenile hares, which averaged an estimated 560 g (1.23 lb). 1.9–7.1% of adults in the regional population of Rochester were taken by red-tails, while only 0.3–0.8 of juvenile hares were taken by them. Despite their reliance on it, only 4% (against 53.4% of the biomass) of the food by frequency here was made up of hares.  On the other hand, in Kluane, Yukon, juvenile hares were taken roughly 11 times more often than adults, despite the larger size of adults here, averaging 1,406.6 g (3.101 lb), and that the overall prey base was less diverse at this more northerly clime. In both Rochester and Kluane Lake, the number of snowshoe hares taken was considerably lower than numbers of ground squirrels taken. The differences of average characteristics of snowshoe hares that were hunted may be partially due to habitat (extent of bog openings to dense forest) or topography.   Another member of the Lagomorpha order has been found in the diet, the much smaller American pika (Ochotona princeps), at 150 g (5.3 oz), but is not quantitatively common in the foods of the species so far as is known. 
A diversity of mammals may be consumed opportunistically outside of the main food groups of rodents and leporids, but usually occur in low numbers. At least five species each are taken of shrews and moles, ranging in size from their smallest mammalian prey, the cinereus (Sorex cinereus) and least shrews (Cryptotis parva), which both weigh about 4.4 g (0.16 oz), to Townsend's mole (Scapanus townsendii), which weighs about 126 g (4.4 oz).       A respectable number of the 90 g (3.2 oz) eastern mole (Scalopus aquaticus) were recorded in studies from Oklahoma and Kansas.   Four species of bat have been recorded in their foods.   The red-tailed hawks local to the large cave colonies of 12.3 g (0.43 oz) Mexican free-tailed bats (Tadarida brasiliensis) in Texas can show surprising agility, some of the same hawks spending their early evening and early morning hours in flight patrolling the cave entrances in order to stoop suddenly on these flighted mammals.    Larger miscellaneous mammalian prey are either usually taken as juveniles, like the nine-banded armadillo (Dasypus novemcinctus), or largely as carrion, like the Virginia opossum (Didelphis virginiana).   Small carnivorans may be taken, usually consisting of much smaller mustelids, like the 150.6 g (5.31 oz) long-tailed weasel (Mustela frenata), which was surprisingly widely taken as a supplemental prey species.      Adult ringtails (Bassariscus astutus), which are about the same weight as a red-tailed hawk at 1,015 g (2.238 lb), are taken as prey occasionally.  Larger carnivoran remains are sometimes found amongst their foods, but most are likely taken as juveniles or smaller range adults, or otherwise consumed only as carrion. Some of the relatively larger carnivorans red-tailed hawks have been known to eat have included red fox ( Vulpes vulpes), kit fox (Vulpes macrotis), white-nosed coati (Nasua narica), raccoon (Procyon lotor), striped skunk (Mephitis mephitis) and domestic cats (Felis silvestris catus).      Many of these medium-sized carnivorans are probably visited as roadkill, especially during the sparser winter months, but carrion has turned up more widely than previously thought. Some nests have been found (to the occasional “shock” of researchers) with body parts from large domestic stock like sheep (Ovis aries), pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus), horses (Equus caballus ferus) and cattle (Bos primigenius taurus) (not to mention wild varieties like deer), which red-tails must visit when freshly dead out on pastures and take a couple talonfuls of meat.     In one instance, a red-tailed hawk was observed to kill a small but seemingly healthy lamb. These are born heavier than most red-tails at 1,500 g (3.3 lb) but in this instance, the hawk was scared away before it could consume its kill by the rifle fire of the shepherd who witnessed the instance. 
Like most (but not all) Buteo hawks, red-tailed hawks do not primarily hunt birds in most areas, but can take them fairly often whenever they opportune upon some that are vulnerable. Birds are, by far, the most diverse class in the red-tailed hawk’s prey spectrum, with well over 200 species known in their foods.    In most circumstances where birds become the main food of red-tailed hawks, it is in response to ample local populations of galliforms. As these are meaty, mostly terrestrial birds which usually run rather than fly from danger (although all wild species in North America are capable of flight), galliforms are ideal avian prey for red-tails. Some 23 species of galliforms are known to be taken by red-tailed hawks, about a third of these being species introduced by humans.   Native quails of all five North American species may expect occasional losses.    All 12 species of grouse native to North America are also occasionally included in their prey spectrum.          In the state of Wisconsin, two large studies, from Waupun and Green County, found the main prey species to be the ring-necked pheasant (Phasianus colchicus), making up 22.7% of a sample of 176 and 33.8% of a sample of 139, respectively.   With a body mass averaging 1,135 g (2.502 lb), adult pheasants are among the largest meals that male red-tails are likely to deliver short of adult rabbits and hares and therefore these nests tend to be relatively productive. Despite being not native to North America, pheasants usually live in a wild state. All Wisconsin studies also found large numbers of chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus), making up as much as 14.4% of the diet. Many studies reflect that free-ranging chickens are vulnerable to red-tailed hawks although somewhat lesser numbers are taken by them overall in comparison to nocturnal predators (i.e. owls and foxes) and goshawks.    In Rochester, Alberta, fairly large numbers of ruffed grouse (Bonasa umbellus) were taken but relatively more juveniles were taken of this species than the two other main contributors to biomass here, snowshoe hare and Townsend’s ground squirrel, as they are fairly independent early on and more readily available. Here the adult grouse was estimated to average 550 g (1.21 lb) against the average juvenile which in mid-summer averaged 170 g (6.0 oz). 
Beyond galliforms, three other quite different families of birds make the most significant contributions to the red-tailed hawk’s avian diet. None of these three families are known as particularly skilled or swift fliers but the species are generally small enough that they would generally easily be more nimble in flight than a red-tailed hawk. One of these are the woodpeckers, if only for one species, the 131.6 g (4.64 oz) northern flicker (Colaptes auratus), which was the best represented bird species in the diet in 27 North American studies and was even the fourth most often detected prey species of all.     Woodpeckers are often a favorite in the diet of large raptors as their relatively slow, undulating flight makes these relatively easy targets. The flicker in particular is a highly numerous species that has similar habitat preferences to red-tailed hawks, preferring fragmented landscapes with trees and openings or parkland-type wooded mosaics, and often forage on the ground for ants, which may make them even more susceptible.   Varied other woodpecker species may turn up in their foods, from the smallest to the largest extant in North America, but are much more infrequently detected in dietary studies.   Another family relatively often selected prey family are corvids, which despite their relatively large size, formidable mobbing abilities and intelligence are also slower than average fliers for passerines. 14 species of corvid are known to fall prey to red-tailed hawks.    In the Kaibab Plateau, the 128 g (4.5 oz) Steller's jay (Cyanocitta stelleri) were the fourth most identified prey species (10.3% of the diet).  453 g (0.999 lb) American crows are also regularly detected supplemental prey in several areas.    Even the huge common raven (Corvus corax), at 1,050 g (2.31 lb) at least as large as red-tailed hawk itself, may fall prey to red-tails, albeit very infrequently and only in a well-staged ambush.  One of the most surprising heavy contributors are the icterids, despite their slightly smaller size and tendency to travel in large, wary flocks, 12 species are known to be hunted.   One species pair, the meadowlarks, are most often selected as they do not flock in the same ways as many other icterids and often come to the ground, throughout their life history, rarely leaving about shrub-height. The 100.7 g (3.55 oz) western meadowlark (Sturnella neglecta), in particular, was the third most often detected bird prey species in North America.      Red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus) which are probably too small, at an average weight of 52.4 g (1.85 oz), and fast for a red-tailed hawk to ever chase on the wing (and do travel in huge flocks, especially in winter) are nonetheless also quite often found in their diet, representing up to 8% of the local diet for red-tails. It is possible that males, which are generally bold and often select lofty perches from which to display, are most regularly ambushed.   One bird species that often flocks with red-winged blackbirds in winter is even better represented in the red-tail’s diet, the non-native 78 g (2.8 oz) European starling (Sturnus vulgaris), being the second most numerous avian prey species and seventh overall in North America.   Although perhaps most vulnerable when caught unaware while calling atonally on a perch, a few starlings (or various blackbirds) may be caught by red-tails which test the agile, twisting murmurations of birds by flying conspicuously towards the flock, to intentionally disturb them and possibly detect lagging, injured individual birds that can be caught unlike healthy birds. However, this behavior has been implied rather than verified.  
Over 50 passerine species from various other families beyond corvids, icterids and starlings are included in the red-tailed hawks’ prey spectrum but are caught so infrequently as to generally not warrant individual mention.   Non-passerine prey taken infrequently may include but are not limited to pigeons and doves, cuckoos, nightjars, kingfishers and parrots.        However, of some interest, is the extreme size range of birds that may be preyed upon. Red-tailed hawks in Caribbean islands seem to catch small birds more frequently due to the paucity of vertebrate prey diversity here. Birds as small as the 7.7 g (0.27 oz) elfin woods warbler (Setophaga angelae) and the 10 g (0.35 oz) bananaquit (Coereba flaveola) may turn up not infrequently as food. How red-tails can catch prey this small and nimble is unclear (perhaps mostly the even smaller nestlings or fledglings are depredated).    In California, most avian prey was stated to be between the size of a starling and a quail.   Numerous water birds may be preyed upon including at least 22 species of shorebirds, at least 17 species of waterfowl, at least 8 species of heron and egrets and at least 8 species of rails, plus a smaller diversity of grebes, shearwaters and ibises.     These may range to as small as the tiny, mysterious and “mouse-like” black rail (Laterallus jamaicensis), weighing an average of 32.7 g (1.15 oz), and snowy plover (Charadrius nivosus), weighing an average of 42.3 g (1.49 oz) (how they catch adults of this prey is not known), to some gulls, ducks and geese as heavy or heavier than a red-tailed hawk itself.  
How large of a duck that red-tailed hawks can capture may be variable. In one instance, a red-tailed hawk failed to kill a healthy drake red-breasted merganser (Mergus serrator), with this duck estimated to weigh 1,100 g (2.4 lb), later the same red-tail was able to dispatch a malnourished red-necked grebe (Podiceps grisegena) (a species usually about as heavy as the merganser), weighing an estimated 657 g (1.448 lb).  However, in interior Alaska, locally red-tailed hawks have become habitual predators of adult ducks, ranging from 345 g (12.2 oz) green-winged teal (Anas carolinensis) to 1,141 g (2.515 lb) mallard (Anas platyrhynchos).  Even larger, occasionally adult Ross's goose (Chen rossii), weighing on average 1,636 g (3.607 lb), have been killed as well.  Also, a non-native Egyptian goose (Alopochen aegyptiaca), in which adults average 1,762 g (3.885 lb), was killed by a red-tail in Texas.  There are several known instances of predation on adult greater sage grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus), although mainly females are reported taken, these averaging 1,200 to 1,745 g (2.646 to 3.847 lb) depending on region. Some adult male sage grouse may have been attacked but, as these average from 2,100 to 3,190 g (4.63 to 7.03 lb), this needs verification.  Even larger, in at least once case a grown hatch-year bird was caught of the rare, non-native Himalayan snowcock (Tetraogallus himalayensis), this species averaging 2,428 g (5.353 lb) in adults.  Red-tailed hawks are a threat to the poults typically of the wild turkey (Meleagris gallopavo). However, in one instance, an immature red-tail was observed trying to attack an adult female turkey, which would weigh about 4,260 g (9.39 lb) (on average). However this red-tail was unable to overpower the turkey hen.  Additionally, young domestic turkeys, weighing up to at least 1,500 g (3.3 lb) or more, have been killed by red-tailed hawks.  Other than wild turkeys, other larger birds occasionally lose young to red-tails such as trumpeter swans (Cygnus buccinator), sandhill cranes (Grus canadensis) and great blue herons (Ardea herodias).  
Early reports claimed relatively little predation of reptiles by red-tailed hawks but these were regionally biased towards the east coast and the upper Midwest of the United States.  However, locally the predation on reptiles can be regionally quite heavy and they may become the primary prey where large, stable numbers of rodents and leporids are not to be found reliably. Nearly 80 species of reptilian prey have been recorded in the diet at this point.    Most predation is on snakes, with more than 40 species known in the prey spectrum. The most often found reptilian species in the diet (and sixth overall in 27 North American dietary studies) was the gopher snake (Pituophis catenifer). Red-tails are efficient predators of these large snakes, which average about 532 g (1.173 lb) in adults, although they also take many small and young gopher snakes.      Along the Columbia River in Washington, large colubrid snakes were found to be the primary prey, with the eastern racer (Coluber constrictor), which averages about 556 g (1.226 lb) in mature adults, the most often recorded at 21.3% of 150 prey items, followed by the gopher snake at 18%. This riverine region lacks ground squirrels and has low numbers of leporids. 43.2% of the overall diet here was made up of reptiles, while mammals, made up 40.6%.   In the Snake River NCA, the gopher snake was the second most regularly recorded (16.2% of 382 items) prey species over the course of the years, and did not appear to be subject to the extreme population fluctuations of mammalian prey here.  Good numbers of smaller colubrids can be taken as well, especially garter snakes.    Red-tailed hawks may engage in avoidance behavior to some extent with regard to venomous snakes. For example, on the San Joaquin Experimental Range in California, they were recorded taking 225 gopher snakes against 83 western rattlesnakes (Crotalus oreganus). Based on surveys, however, the rattlesnakes were five times more abundant on the range than the gopher snakes.   Nonetheless, at least 15 venomous snakes have been recorded in the red-tailed hawk’s diet.   The smallest known snake known to be hunted by red-tailed hawks is the 6 g (0.21 oz) redbelly snake (Storeria occipitomaculata).  Red-tailed hawks have been seen flying off with snake prey that may exceed 153 cm (5 ft 0 in) in length in some cases.  One red-tail was photographed killing a “fairly large” eastern diamondback rattlesnake (Crotalus adamanteus), this being North America’s heaviest snake and the heaviest venomous snake in the Americas at a large mature size of about 2,300 g (5.1 lb).   For the eastern indigo snakes (Drymarchon couperi), North America’s longest native snake, usually young and small ones are at risk. 
In North America, fewer lizards are typically recorded in the foods of red-tailed hawk than are snakes, probably because snakes are considerably better adapted to cooler, seasonal weather, with an extensive diversity of lizards found only in the southernmost reaches of the contiguous United States. A fair number of lizards were recorded in the diet in southern California and red-tails can be counted among the primary predatory threats to largish lizards in the United States such as the 245 g (8.6 oz) common chuckawalla (Sauromalus ater).     However, the red-tailed hawks ranging into the neotropics regularly take numerous species of lizards. This is especially true of hawks living on islands which are not naturally colonized by small mammals. Insular red-tails commonly pluck up mostly tiny anoles, that may average only 1.75 to 43.5 g (0.062 to 1.534 oz) in adult mass, depending on species.    Not all tropical lizards taken by red-tailed hawks are so dainty and some are easily as large as most birds and reptiles taken elsewhere such as adults of the 1,800 g (4.0 lb) San Esteban chuckwalla (Sauromalus varius) and even those as large as 2,800 g (6.2 lb) Cape spinytail iguanas (Ctenosaura hemilopha) and 4,000 g (8.8 lb) green iguanas (Iguana iguana) (though it is not clearly noted whether they can take healthy adults iguanas or not).    Beyond snakes and lizards, there are a few cases of red-tailed hawks preying on baby or juvenile turtles, i.e. the gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus), the desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) and the common snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina).  
Records of predation on amphibians is fairly infrequent. It is thought that such prey may be slightly underrepresented, as they are often consumed whole and may not leave a trace in pellets. Their fine bones may dissolve upon consumption.    So far as is known, North American red-tailed hawks have preyed upon 9 species of amphibian, four of which are toads. Known amphibian prey has ranged to as small as the 0.75 g (0.026 oz) red-backed salamander (Plethodon cinereus), the smallest known vertebrate prey for red-tailed hawks, to the 430 g (15 oz) American bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus).    Invertebrates, mostly represented by insects like beetles and crickets, are better represented in the stomach contents of red-tailed hawks than their pellets or prey remains.   It is possible some invertebrate prey is ingested incidentally, as in other various birds of prey, they can in some cases be actually from the stomachs of birds eaten by the raptor.   However, some red-tails, especially immatures early in their hunting efforts, often do spend much of the day on the ground grabbing terrestrial insects and spiders.      The red-tailed hawks of Puerto Rico frequently consume Puerto Rican freshwater crabs (Epilobocera sinuatifrons), which average 9.4 g (0.33 oz).    Other island populations, such as those on Socorro island, also feed often on terrestrial crabs, here often blunting their claws while catching them.  Fish are the rarest class of prey based on dietary studies. Among the rare instances of them capturing fish have included captures of wild channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus), non-native common carp (Cyprinus carpio) and ornamental koi (Cyprinus rubrofuscus) as well some hawks that were seen scavenging on dead chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta).   
As easily one of the most abundant of all American raptorial birds, red-tailed hawks have been recorded as interacting with every other diurnal bird of prey. Due to the extreme dietary plasticity of red-tails, the food habits of other birds of prey regularly overlap considerably with red-tails. Furthermore, due to its ability to nest in varied habitats, home ranges also frequently abut those of other raptor species.   The most obvious similar species in their range are other Buteo hawks, especially larger species with a similar ecological niche. Two of the larger, more widespread other Buteos are the Swainson's hawk and the ferruginous hawks and, as with many other birds of prey, red-tailed hawks occur in almost the entirety of these birds’ breeding ranges.   These species have broadly similar breeding season diets, especially the ferruginous and red-tailed hawks. In some areas, such as Snake River NCA the diets of the two species consist of more than 90% of the same species and body mass of prey taken was similar.   Therefore, all three large Buteo hawks defend their territories from each other with almost the same degree of dedication that they defend from others of their own species. In some cases, territorial clashes of Swainson's hawks and red-tailed hawks can last up to 12 hours, however, the birds involved are usually careful to avoid physical contact.   Due to the similarities of the foods and their aggressive dispositions towards one another, these Buteos need some degree of partitioning in order to persist alongside one another and this usually is given by habitat preferences. The ferruginous hawk prefers open, practically treeless prairie while of these, the red-tailed hawks prefers the most wooded areas with large trees, while the Swainson's hawk prefer roughly intermediate areas.    Where the habitat is more open, such as in Cassia County, Idaho, the Swainson's and ferruginous hawks have the advantage in numbers and red-tails are scarce.  However, habitat alterations by humans, such as fire suppression and recovering pasture, usually favor the red-tailed hawk and are to the detriment of the other two species.    These practices have caused range expansions of many other species of birds but declines in many others.    Of these three Buteo species, the Swainson's hawk is most dissimilar, being a long-distance migrant which travels to South America each winter and, for much of the year, prefers to prey on insects (except for during breeding, when more nutritious food such as ground squirrels are mainly fed to the young). It also breeds notably later than the other two species.  Surprisingly, although it's slightly smaller in body mass and has notably smaller (and presumably weaker) feet than ferruginous and red-tailed hawks, the Swainson's is actually usually (but not invariably) dominant in territorial conflicts over the other two. Part of this advantage is that the Swainson's hawk is apparently a superior flier both in long and short distance flights, with its more pointed wing shape and lower wing loading allowing it more agile, sustained and speedier flight that the bulkier hawks cannot match.  Therefore, in north-central Oregon, Swainson's hawks were shown to be more productive, in prairie located trees, and partially displaced prior-breeding red-tails several times, although overall breeding success rates were not perceptibly decreased in the latter hawk.   In the Chihuahuan Desert of Mexico, Swainson's hawks usually nested in lowlands and red-tails nested in highlands but interspecies conflicts nevertheless were apparently quite frequent. Usually, the habitat preferences of red-tailed hawks and ferruginous hawks are discrepant enough to keep serious territorial conflicts to a minimum.   However, red-tailed hawks and ferruginous hawks occasionally engaged in kleptoparasitism towards one another, usually during winter. Red-tails may be somewhat dominant based on prior reports in food conflicts but the ferruginous hawk may also win these.  Where they overlap, the hawk species may adjust their daily routine to minimize contact, which tends to be costly of time and energy and may cause the hawks to abandon their nests for long stretches of time, which in turn leaves their young vulnerable to predation.  When habitats change rapidly, often due to human interference, and the species nest more closely than natural partitioning would allow, in all three nesting success can decline significantly. 
Beyond the Swainson's and ferruginous hawks, six other Buteos co-occur with red-tailed hawks in different parts of North America. Many of these are substantially smaller than red-tails and most serious territorial conflicts with them are naturally mitigated by nesting in deeper wooded areas.   One other larger species, the rough-legged buzzard, mostly nests far north of the breeding range of red-tailed hawks. However, in Alaska they sometimes nest in the same areas. The rough-legged buzzards are both cliff and tree nesters and areas used by the two species are not necessarily mutually exclusive but each seems to avoid the other, in part by differing breeding schedules.  Wintering rough-legged buzzards may regularly come into conflict over food with red-tailed hawks and seem to be subordinate to the red-tails, with several records of them being chased off both kills and carrion by the red-tailed hawks. During winter their hunting habits may keep them somewhat separate, the rough-legged being a much more aerial hunter, but rough-legged buzzards usually withdrew if a red-tailed hawk flew towards them. There is at least one case, however, of a rough-legged buzzard being the victor of a conflict over a kill with a red-tailed hawk.   Red-tailed hawks are conspicuously more aggressive and tend to be dominant over slenderer, medium-sized Buteos such as red-shouldered hawks and zone-tailed hawks (Buteo albonotatus).  In Massachusetts, red-shoulder hawks used mixed forests and hardwoods as nesting habitat while red-tails most often used in pitch pine and stunted oaks on Cape Cod. Nesting range overlap here most often occurred on white pine forests. As habitat has opened over time, red-tailed hawks frequently took over former red-shouldered hawk territories, even using their nests in two cases.   In north-central Florida, it was found during winter that red-shouldered and red-tailed hawk habitat usage blurred and, because the local habitat favors red-shouldered hawks, they easily outnumbered the number of red-tailed hawks in the area. Therefore, again with sufficient habitat partitioning, the two species can live near one another without negatively effecting one another.  In the American southwest and Texas, two relatively large buteonine hawks also live alongside red-tailed hawks, the Harris's hawk (Parabuteo unicinctus) and the white-tailed hawk (Geranoaetus albicaudatus). Usually, habitat preferences kept conflicts to a minimum, with the red-tailed hawk favoring taller, more isolated saguaro cactus for nesting, whereas the other species outnumbered red-tails in areas that were denser and more shrubby.   The Harris's hawk was determined to be a superior aerial hunter over red-tailed hawks, and could take down flying birds more routinely. 
Hawks and kites from outside the buteonine lineage are usually substantially smaller or at least different enough in diet and habitat to largely avoid heavy conflict with red-tailed hawks. On occasion, northern harriers (Circus hudsonius) which have much lower wing loading, will mob red-tailed hawks out of their home ranges but in winter the red-tails seem to be dominant over them in conflicts over food.   Among Accipiter hawks, the most similar to the red-tailed hawk in diet and size is the northern goshawk. In some areas, the prey species of these can be very similar and North American populations of goshawks take many more squirrels and leporids than their Eurasian counterparts do.   It was found that the feet and striking force of hunting goshawks was more powerful than that of the red-tailed hawk, despite the red-tails being up to 10% heavier in some parts of North America.  Therefore, wild goshawks can dispatch larger prey both on average and at maximum prey size, with some victims of female goshawks such as adult hares and galliforms such as turkey and capercaillie weighing up to or exceeding roughly 4,000 g (8.8 lb).    In a comparative study in the Kaibab Plateau of Arizona, however, it was found that red-tailed hawks had several population advantages. Red-tails were more flexible in diet, although there was a very broad overlap in prey species selected, and nesting habitat than the goshawks were.  As red-tailed hawks in conflict with other more closely related Buteo hawks rarely (if ever) result in mortality on either side, goshawks and red-tailed hawks do seem to readily kill one another. Adults of both species have been shown to be able to kill adults of the other.    
The great horned owl occupies a similar ecological niche nocturnally to the red-tailed hawk.  There have been many studies that have contrasted the ecology of these two powerful raptors.    The great horned owl averages heavier and larger footed, with northern populations averaging up to 26% heavier in the owl than the hawk.  However, due in part to the red-tail’s more extensive access to sizable prey such as ground squirrels, several contrasting dietary studies found that the estimated mean prey size of the red-tailed hawk, at 175 g (6.2 oz), was considerably higher than that of the great horned owl, at 76 g (2.7 oz).  Also, the diet of red-tailed hawk seems to be more flexible by prey type, as only just over 65% of their diet is made of mammals, whereas great horned owls were more restricted feeders on mammals, selecting them 87.6% of the time.    However, the overall prey spectrum of great horned owls includes more species of mammals and birds (but far less reptiles) and the great horned owl can attack prey of a wider size range, including much larger prey items than any taken by red-tailed hawks. Mean prey weights in different areas for great horned owls can vary from 22.5 to 610.4 g (0.79 to 21.53 oz), so is far more variable than that of red-tailed hawks (at 43.4 to 361.4 g (1.53 to 12.75 oz)) and can be much larger (by about 45%) than the largest estimated size known for the red-tailed hawk's mean prey weight but conversely the owl can also subsist on prey communities averaging much smaller in body size than can support the hawk.   Some prey killed by great horned owls was estimated to weigh up to 6,800 g (15.0 lb).    Great horned owls and red-tailed hawks compete not only for food but more seriously over nesting areas and home ranges. Great horned owls are incapable of constructing nests and readily expropriate existing red-tail nests. The habitat preferences of the two species are quite similar and the owl frequently uses old red-tail nests, but they do seem to prefer more enclosed nest locations where available over the generally open situation around red-tailed hawk nests. Sometimes in warmer areas, the owls may nest sufficiently early to have fledged young by the time red-tails start to lay. However, when there is a temporal overlap in reproductive cycles, the owl sometimes takes over an occupied red-tail nest, causing desertion. Red-tailed hawks have an advantage in staple prey flexibility as aforementioned, while great horned owl populations can be stressed when preferred prey is scarce, especially when they rely on leporids such as hares and jackrabbits.     For example, in Alberta, when snowshoe hares were at their population peak, red-tailed hawks did not increase in population despite taking many, with only a slight increase in mean clutch size, whereas the owls fluctuated in much more dramatic ways in accordance with snowshoe hare numbers. The red-tails migratory behavior was considered as the likely cause of this lack of effect, whereas great horned owls remained through the winter and was subject to winter-stress and greater risk of starvation.  As a nester, great horned owl has the advantage in terms of flexibility, being somewhat spread more evenly across different habitats whereas in undisturbed areas, red-tailed hawks seem to nest more so in clusters where habitat is favorable.     Predatory relationships between red-tailed hawks and great horned owls are quite one-sided, with the great horned owl likely the overall major predator of red-tails. On the other hand, red-tailed hawks are rarely (if ever) a threat to the great horned owl. Occasionally a red-tailed hawk can strike down an owl during the day but only in a few singular cases has this killed an owl.   Most predation by the owls on the hawks is directed at nestlings at the point where the red-tails’ nestlings are old enough that the parents no longer roost around the nest at night. Up to at least 36% of red-tailed hawk nestlings in a population may be lost to great horned owls.   Adult and immature red-tailed hawks are also occasionally preyed upon at night by great horned owls in any season. In one case, a great horned owl seemed to have ambushed, killed and fed upon a full-grown migrating red-tail even in broad daylight.   Occasionally, both red-tails and great horned owls will engage each other during the day and, even though the red-tailed hawk has the advantage at this time of day, either may succeed in driving away the other.    Despite their contentious relations, the two species may nest quite close to one another. For example, in Saskatchewan, the smallest distance between nests was only 32 to 65 m (105 ft 0 in to 213 ft 3 in). In these close proximity areas all owl nests succeeded while only two red-tail nests were successful.  In Waterloo, Wisconsin, the two species were largely segregated by nesting times, as returning red-tailed hawks in April–June were usually able to successfully avoid nesting in groves holding great horned owls, which can begin nesting activities as early as February.  In Delaware County, Ohio and in central New York state, divergence of hunting and nesting times usually allowed both species to succeed in nesting. In all three areas, any time the red-tails tried to nest closer to great horned owls, their breeding success rates lowered considerably. It is presumable that sparser habitat and prey resources increased the closeness of nesting habits of the two species, to the detriment of the red-tails. Due to nesting proximity to great horned owls, mature red-tails may have losses ranging from 10 to 26%.    
Red-tailed hawks may face competition from a very broad range of predatory animals, including birds outside of typically active predatory families, carnivoran mammals and some reptiles such as snakes. Mostly these diverse kinds of predators are segregated by their hunting methods, primary times of activity and habitat preferences. In California, both the red-tails and western diamondback rattlesnakes (Crotalus atrox) live mainly on California ground squirrel, but the rattlesnake generally attacks the squirrels in and around their burrows, whereas the hawks must wait until they leave the burrows to capture them.  Hawks have been observed following American badgers (Taxidea taxus) to capture prey they flush and the two are considered potential competitors, especially in sparse sub-desert areas where the rodent foods they both favor are scarce.  Competition over carcasses may occur with American crows, and several crows, usually about six or more, working together can displace a hawk.  Another avian scavenger, the turkey vulture (Cathartes aura), is dominated by red-tails and may be followed by red-tails in order to supplant a carcass found by the vulture with their keen sense of smell.  In some cases, red-tailed hawks may be considered lessened as food competitors by their lack of specialization. For instance, no serious competition probably occurs between them and Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis) despite both living on snowshoe hares. 
Distinguishing territorial exclusionary behavior and anti-predator behavior is difficult in raptorial birds. However, as opposed to other medium to largish hawks which chase off red-tails most likely as competition, in much smaller raptors such as kestrels and smaller Accipiter hawks, their aggressive reaction to red-tailed hawks is almost certainly an anti-predator behavior. Although less prolific than goshawks, some eagles and, especially, great horned owls, red-tailed hawks can and do prey upon smaller birds of prey. The following species of accipitrid have been known to fall prey to red-tailed hawks, potentially including nestlings, fledglings, immatures and/or adults: swallow-tailed kite (Elanoides forficatus),  Mississippi kite (Ictinia mississippiensis),  white-tailed kite (Elanus leucurus),  northern harrier (Circus hudsonius),  sharp-shinned hawk (Accipiter striatus),  Cooper's hawk (Accipiter cooperii),  goshawks,  gray hawk (Buteo plagiatus),  red-shouldered hawk  and broad-winged hawk (Buteo platypterus).  These species range from the 135.7 g (4.79 oz) sharp-shinned hawk, the smallest North American accipitrid, to the goshawk, which at 956 g (2.108 lb) is nearly red-tailed hawk sized.  Additionally, there are records of red-tailed hawks hunting 9 species of owl, ranging in size from the 104.2 g (3.68 oz) northern saw-whet owl (Aegolius acadius) to juveniles of the 1,079 g (2.379 lb) great gray owl (Strix nebulosa) and seemingly adults of the 717 g (1.581 lb) barred owl (Strix varia).   Red-tails will also hunt falcons including adult American kestrels (Falco sparverius) and merlins (Falco columbarius) and presumed nestlings of the peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus).    When hunting other raptorial birds, red-tailed hawks seem to ambush them from a perch, diving suddenly and unexpectedly upon spotting the quarry and tend to have the greatest success when the raptorial prey is distracted, such as those migrating on windy days, feeding on their own prey and tending to their nest.   
In turn, red-tailed hawks may engage in behavior that straddles territorial exclusion and anti-predator behavior to the two much larger raptors in North America which actively hunt, the eagles. Red-tails are most commonly seen flying towards and aggressively displacing both flying bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) and golden eagles (Aquila chrysaetos), but may also, to the contrary, unobtrusively duck down out of flight to an inconspicuous perch when an eagle is spotted. The behavioral variation is probably related to the activity of hawks, which may feel the need to protect their nests and food resources while actively breeding but are not usually willing to risk their lives in attacking an eagle while migrating or wintering. At times mobbing behavior of smaller raptors may cause both eagles to turn over and present their large talons to their attacker, which can be dangerous for the smaller hawk.     Besides the great horned owl, the two eagle species are the only known animals known to regularly threaten red-tailed hawks of any age. In particular, the golden eagle is probably the greatest daytime threat to fledged immature and adult red-tails, as these have turned up in many dietary studies of the powerful eagle.   Less efficient as a predator of red-tails, bald eagles nonetheless have been recording killing adults in some cases or, more often, depredating red-tailed hawk nests. On occasion, this may result in the bald eagle bringing the nestling red-tails to their own nest and, for some reason, not killing them. In some cases, the bald eagles inadvertently actually raise the nestling red-tails themselves and the baby red-tailed hawks may successfully fledge.  In one case, a red-tailed hawk was observed to kill a bald eagle chick, whether this was predatory or competitive, it quickly abandoned the dead nestling after the eagle’s parents returned.  On several tropical islands, which are often shared only with other hawks, owls and falcons of only medium or small size and typically lack larger raptors or carnivorans, the red-tailed hawk may be the largest native predator and will, in these cases, be considered the apex predator.   Other than large birds of prey, extensive records of predation on red-tailed hawks is surprisingly poor, in spite of several populations recording nestlings and eggs disappearing through presumed acts of natural predation. The most likely major predator of eggs and nestlings that disappear is the raccoon which, during its nocturnal foraging, is a notorious enemy of nearly any kind of birds nest.    It is also known that unidentified large snakes, probably consisting of the same species that the red-tails so readily predate during broad daylight, will prey upon nestling red-tails.  In California, common ravens were recorded preying on the downy young of red-tailed hawks.  Other corvids, including blue jays (Cyanocitta cristata), California scrub jays (Aphelocoma californica) and crows, are known to feed on eggs and small nestlings either when nest attendance is atypically low by the hawks or when they can successful harass the parent hawks via mobbing so severely that they temporarily leave the nest.    Blackflies (Simulium canonicolum) have been recorded as killing several red-tail chicks through blood loss.  There are also several cases of possible prey turning the tables on red-tailed hawks and either maiming or killing them. This is especially true of snakes, with some prey species of Pituophis, Pantherophis and Coluber known to overpower and nearly kill, often the hawk survives only if by human intervention. Not infrequently prey such as coral snakes and rattlesnakes may succeed in killing red-tailed hawks with their venom, even if they themselves are also killed and partially consumed.     Peregrine falcons are also known to kill red-tailed hawks that have come too close to their nests by stooping upon them. 
Pairs either court for the first time or engage in courtship rituals to strengthen pre-existing pair bonds before going into the breeding. The breeding season usually begins in late February through March, but can commence as early as late December in Arizona and late January in Wisconsin or to the opposite extreme as late as mid-April as in Alberta.     In this pre-nesting period, high-circling with much calling will occur. One or both members of a pair may be involved. The courtship display often involves dangling legs, at times the pair will touching each other's wings and male's feet may touch female's back, she may occasional roll over and present talons, food passes are rarely reported.    High soaring occurs aseasonally. Circling above territory tends to be done noisily and conspicuously, helping insure against possible takeovers. Spring circling of a pair can be a prelude to copulation.  A typical sky-dance involves the male hawk climbing high in flight with deep, exaggerated beats and then diving precipitously on half-closed wings at great speed, checking, and shooting back up, or often plunging less steeply and repeating process in a full rollercoaster across the sky. Sky-dances are done on periphery of the pair’s territory and it appears to designate the territory limits, occasionally one male’s sky-dance may also trigger a sky-dance by a neighboring male, who may even run a parallel course in the sky. Sky-dances no longer occur after late incubation.    Boundary flight displays may be engaged in by all four birds of 2 adjacent pairs.  Cartwheeling with interlocking talons is also seen occasionally in spring, almost always a territorial male expelling an intruding one, the latter often being a second or third year male that is newly mature. A perched display, with fluffed-out breast feathers may too occur at this time. Even males that are in spring migration have been recorded engaging in a separate display: circling at slow speed before partially closing wings, dropping legs with talons spread and tilting from side-to-side. A female hawk is usually around when migrating male does this but she does not engage in this display herself.   The area of occupancy of breeding territories by pairs is variable based on regional habitat composition. The highest recorded density of pairs was in California where each pair occurred on 1.3 km2 (0.50 sq mi), which was actually just ahead of Puerto Rico where pair occupancy averaged 1.56 km2 (0.60 sq mi) in peak habitat. The largest known average territory sizes were surprisingly in Ohio, where the average area of occupancy by pairs was recorded as 50 km2 (19 sq mi).    In Wisconsin mean ranges for males range from 1.17 to 3.9 km2 (0.45 to 1.51 sq mi) in males and from 0.85 to 1.67 km2 (0.33 to 0.64 sq mi) in females, respectively in summer and winter. Here and elsewhere, both members of the pair stay quite close together throughout winter if they are sedentary. On the other hand, migrant populations tend to separate while migrating and return to the same territory to find its prior mate, sometimes before they reach their home range.    In Alaska, returning migrant pairs were able to displace lone red-tailed hawks that had stayed on residence, especially lone males but sometimes even lone females.  In general, the red-tailed hawk will only take a new mate when its original mate dies.  Although pairs often mate for life, replacement of mates can often be quite fast for this common bird species. In one case in Baja California, when a female was shot on May 16, the male of that pair was seen to have selected a new mate the following day.   In copulation, the female, when perched, tilts forward, allowing the male to land with his feet lodged on her horizontal back. The female twists and moves her tail feathers to one side, while the mounted male twists his cloacal opening around the female's cloaca. Copulation lasts 5 to 10 seconds and during pre-nesting courtship in late winter or early spring can occur numerous times each day. 
The pair constructs a stick nest most often in a large tree 4 to 21 m (13 to 69 ft) off the ground or on a cliff ledge 35 m (115 ft) or higher above the ground, or may nest on virtually any man-made structures with some variety of ample ledges or surface space and good views of the surrounding environment (i.e. powerline poles, radio transmission towers, skyscraper buildings).     Much variation is recorded in nest usage behavior, many red-tails build new nests every year despite prior nests sometimes being in good standing and unoccupied, some may reuse a nest in subsequent years or may leave a nest for a year and then come back to it the following year.   A red-tailed hawk nest is typically located in a gradient zone between woods with tall, mature trees, if available, and openings whether this is composed of shrubland, grassland or agricultural areas.  Nest sites vary greatly in topography and vegetative composition.  At times, unlike great horned owls, red-tailed hawks have been recorded nesting in surprisingly unbroken forests.  In North Dakota, nest sites tend to be concentrated along wooded river drainages.  Compared to Swainson's hawks and ferruginous hawks, red-tailed hawk nests are usually in taller trees and are closer to waterways.   In Puerto Rico, nests are most often found in transitional zone between dry lowlands and mountainous cloud forests, with trees typically taller than their neighbors to allow views of more than half of their home ranges. More than 21 tree species were recorded used in Puerto Rico.  Tree species is seemingly unimportant to red-tailed hawks.  In some parts of Arizona, saguaro cactus were used exclusively as nesting sites.  Alternately, old nests of other Buteo hawks, corvids, golden eagles and even leaf nests of tree squirrels have also been used by red-tailed hawks.  Both members of the pair will build the nests but the female spends more time forming the bowl, with the greatest activity often in the morning and nest building completed in a week or less.   The nest is generally 71 to 97 cm (28 to 38 in) in diameter, with a mean of roughly 76 cm (30 in), and can be up to 96 cm (38 in) tall after several years use. The inner bowl averages about 37 cm (15 in) wide and 13 cm (5.1 in) deep.    The nest is constructed of twigs, and lined with bark, pine needles, corn cobs, husks, stalks, aspen catkins, or other plant lining matter. Lining the nest may be for warning other red-tails of the active use of a nest.   In moderate to northern climes, red-tailed hawks tend to face to the south or west, presumably to make them less vulnerable to strong northeasterly storm winds. 
In most of the interior contiguous United States the first egg is laid between mid-March and early April, ranging from 3 to 5 weeks after the nest is constructed, with the clutch completed 2 to 5 days after the initial egg is laid.   The average date of the laying the first egg can be variable: peaking mid-January in Puerto Rico, averaging March 9th in Arizona, March 26 in the Front Range Urban Corridor and May 1st in Alberta.     The mean initiation of clutches may bump weeks later if 10 cm (3.9 in) or more of snow is still on the ground in Wisconsin during March.  A clutch of one to three eggs is laid in March or April, depending upon latitude, with four eggs being uncommon and five and perhaps even six increasingly rare.  Clutch size depends almost exclusively on the availability of prey for the adults. At the species level, body size also determines clutch size. For example, while the total clutch weighs up to 18% of the females weight and the clutch size averages 2 to 3, a larger raptor like the golden eagle lays a smaller clutch, usually not more than two, that weighs less than 10% in total of the female’s body mass, whereas a smaller raptor like the kestrel lays a larger clutch averaging five that weighs 50% of the females weight.  Average clutch size vary from 1.96 in Alaska when prey populations were low up to 2.96 in Washington.   Eggs are laid approximately every other day. Average egg sizes in height and width (each with a sample size of 20) are in the following subspecies- B. j. borealis: 59.53 mm × 47.49 mm (2.344 in × 1.870 in); B. j. calurus: 60.04 mm × 47.1 mm (2.364 in × 1.854 in); B. j. fuertesi: 59.42 mm × 46.99 mm (2.339 in × 1.850 in).  The eggs of red-tailed hawks are mostly white, sometimes with a faint buffy wash; at times the eggs manifest a sparsely or heavily marked with blotches of buff, pale reddish-brown, dark brown, or purple. The markings often appear indistinctly and may combine to form a fine speckling.  They are incubated primarily by female, with the male substituting when the female leaves to hunt or merely stretch her wings. Rarely do the males incubate more than four hours of daylight. The male brings most food to the female while she incubates.    
After 28 to 35 days of incubation (averaging about three days longer in the Caribbean as does fledgling as compared to North American red-tails), the eggs hatch over 2 to 4 days.   Like most raptorial birds, the nestlings are altricial and nidicolous at hatching.   Hatchlings average 58 g (2.0 oz) in body mass with no difference in sizes of the sexes until the young are about 29 days old for mass and 21 days or so for external linear standard measurements such as bill and talon size.  The female broods them while the male provides most of the food to the female and the young, which are also known as eyasses (pronounced "EYE-ess-ez"). The female feeds the eyasses after tearing the food into small pieces. The young red-tails are active by the second day when they issue soft peeping calls, bounce, and wave continuously with their wings. By day 7, the bouncing and peeping begin to wane, and young start to peck at prey in their nest. Nestlings emit high whistling notes (usually in response to adults overhead) by day 10, sit up on tarsometatarsi by day 15, become aggressive toward intruders by day 16, strike out with talons and wings by day 21, begin to stretch wings and exercise regularly by day 30. After 42 to 46 days, the eyasses begin to leave the nest and tear apart prey for themselves.   The amount of food brought to the nest daily varies considerably, based on brood size and prey availability. In Alberta, an average of 410 to 730 g (14 to 26 oz) is brought each day for 1 to 3 nestlings while in Washington, it was estimated a minimum of 520 g (1.15 lb) per day for 1 surviving nestling and in Wisconsin, an estimated 219 g (7.7 oz) was needed for 1 nestling and 313 g (11.0 oz) for 2.    Brooding is strenuous for parent red-tails and both members of the pair usually lose some weight, especially the female. Some females may lose over 100 g (3.5 oz) between hatching and fledging.  During brooding the female may become aggressive to intruders, including humans. In the east, red-tailed hawk females rarely defend nests from humans but historically in California and quite often still in Alaska, some female will dive repeatedly and "savagely", sometimes snapping off large branches in her temper, occasionally stunning herself or inadvertently knocking down her own youngster if it is attempting to fledge. Apparently, the less extensive prior exposure they have to humans may make mature females more aggressive towards humans near the nest.    Although development is asynchronical in most nests, runting may sometimes be recorded and even siblicide may occur, with the parents feeding the weaker, younger chicks less so and both the siblings and parents occasionally aggressively pecking the “runts” of the nest. Ultimately, the runt in such cases does not usually survive and may be either found crushed in the nest, discarded out of the nest after starvation or consumed by the parents or the siblings. However, as a whole, such killings are fairly rare and only occur when food supplies are extremely low, often this being in sync with poor spring weather (such as overly rainy or cold conditions).    If there is too much food, such as California ground squirrels in California, the parents will discard remains after a day or two since decomposition of their prey invites infection, other diseases and blood-sucking insects to the nest that may endanger the nestlings. However, after about four weeks, the female often stops discarding leftover prey and the increased presence of flies may form somewhat of a risk to disease in the young but may also merely get the young to leave the nest sooner.   One nest in California had two females and one male attended to; the male performed his usual function but both females would brood and tend to the nest.  Additionally, bald eagles have been recorded to occasionally adopt red-tail fledglings into their nests. As recorded in Shoal Harbor Migratory Bird Sanctuary located near Sydney, British Columbia, on June 9, 2017, a juvenile red-tailed hawk was taken by a pair of bald eagles back to their nest, whereupon the chick, originally taken as prey, was accepted into the family by both the parents and the eagles' three fledglings. After surviving six weeks amongst the eagles, the fledgling, nicknamed "Spunky" by birdwatchers, had successfully begun learning to hunt and fly, showing that the aggressive hawk was able to survive amongst a nest of much larger adoptive siblings.  
Young typically leave the nest for the first time and attempt their first flights at about 42–46 days after hatching but usually they stay very near the nest for the first few days. During this period, the fledglings remain fairly sedentary, though they may chase parents and beg for food. Parents deliver food directly or, more commonly, drop it near the young. Short flights are typically undertaken for the first 3 weeks after fledgling and the young red-tails activity level often doubles. About 6 to 7 weeks after fledging, the young begin to capture their own prey, which often consists of insects and frogs that the young hawks can drop down to onto the ground with relative ease. At the point they are 15 weeks old, they may start attempts to hunt more difficult mammal and bird prey in sync with their newly developed skills for sustained flight, and most are efficient mammal predators fairly soon after their first attempts at such prey. Shortly thereafter, when the young are around 4 months of age, they become independent of their parents. In some extreme cases, juvenile red-tails may prolong their association with their parents to as long as they are half a year old, as was recorded in Wisconsin.     After dispersing from the parental territory, juveniles from several nests may congregate and interact in a juvenile staging area. Although post-fledgling siblings in their parents care are fairly social, they are rarely seen together post distribution from their parents range.   Usually, newly independent young hawks leave the breeding area and migrate, if necessary, earlier than adults do, however the opposite was true in the extreme north of Alaska, where adults were recorded to leave first.   Immature hawks in migratory populations tend to distribute further in winter than adults from these populations do.  Immatures attempting to settle for the winter often are harassed from territory to territory by older red-tails, settling only in small, marginal areas. In some cases, such as near urban regions, immatures may be driven to a small pockets of urban vegetation with less tree cover and limited food resources. When a distant adult appear, immature may drop from a prominent perch to a more concealed one.   In some cases, hungry immature red-tails have been recorded making attempts at hunting prey beyond their capacities, expending valuable energy, such as healthy adults of larger carnivorans such as coyotes (Canis latrans), foxes and badgers and healthy flying passerines.  There are some cases of red-tailed hawks, presumably younger than two years of age, attempting to breed, often with an adult bird of the opposite sex. Such cases have been recorded in Alberta, Arizona and Wisconsin, with about half of these attempts being successful at producing young.     However, while adult plumage and technically sexual maturity is attained at two years old, many red-tails do not first successfully breed until they are around 3 years of age. 
Breeding success is variable due to many factors. Estimated nesting success usually falls between 58% and 93%.   Nesting success rates are probably drive primarily by prey populations, regional habitat composition, competition levels with other red-tailed hawks, predation rates (often due to great horned owls or perhaps raccoons) and human disturbance levels.    In Oregon specifically, nesting success varied primarily based on "dispersion and density of perches" secondarily to ground squirrel abundance and whether the nest of other pairs red-tails was directly visible from a nest.   Repeated disturbances at the nest early in the nesting cycle may cause abandonment of eggs or nestlings in some cases, but seemingly pairs are less likely to abandon the young later in the season in cases of human disturbance.  30% of nesting deaths in a study from Wisconsin were from nestlings falling to their death or the nest collapsing.  In Puerto Rico, habitat appeared to be the primary driver of breeding success, as in lowland pastures nesting success was 43% producing a mean number of fledglings of 1.5 whereas in cloud forest success was 34% producing a mean of 0.7 fledglings.  A modelling study in Puerto Rico showed that, apart from adult survival, nestling survival had the second greatest influence on population growth.  In Wyoming, 12 pairs on a 12 square mile tract produced an average of 1.4 young per pair.  In comparison, the mean number of fledglings was 0.96 in Michigan, 1.36 in Montana and was 1.4 in the Appalachians.    In Wisconsin, the number of young successfully to fledge ranged from 1.1 to 1.8 from year to year probably depending on staple prey numbers.  The record lifespan in wild for a red-tailed hawk is 25 years and 5 months from banding studies. In comparison, lifespans of up to 29.5 years have been recorded in captivity.  In the wild, other red-tailed hawks have lived for at least 25 years, for example, Pale Male was born in 1990, and in Spring 2014 is still raising eyasses.  However, of 5195 banded wild red-tailed hawks in one bander’s recordings, only 31 were reported to have survived to 17 years of age and only 11 survived for 20 years.  The average mortality rate at 1 year of age for red-tails is 54% and thereafter is around 20% from banding sources.  The estimated average lifespan of red-tailed hawks who attain maturity, per Palmer (1988), was claimed as only 6 to 7 years.  The main causes of mortality considered as electrocution on power lines, other collisions, shooting, consumption of poisoned baits set for other animals and collision with vehicles and other crafts. While most mortality of young red-tails is at least mainly due to natural causes, mortality of fledged or older red-tails is now mostly attributable to human killing, accidental or intentional, as well as flying into manmade materials.    Hawks in urban areas are threatened by the use of rat traps and poisoned bait to kill rodents. This generally consists of warfarin cookies which induce internal bleeding in rats and mice, and a hawk that ingests rodents who have consumed rat poison can itself be affected.  Red-tailed hawks are also vulnerable to fatal bacterial infections include peritonitis, myocarditis, granulamotous, sarcocystosis and mycobateriosis as well as some forms of viral infection, to which immature hawks especially, as they often have less access to coverage in poor weather conditions, are most vulnerable.  Neither this nor other Buteo hawks were found to be highly susceptible to long-term DDT egg-shell thinning due to being part, generally, of relatively short, terrestrial-based food chains. 
The red-tailed hawk is a popular bird in falconry, particularly in the United States where the sport of falconry is tightly regulated; this type of hawk is widely available and is frequently assigned to apprentice falconers.  Red-tailed hawks are highly tameable and trainable, with a more social disposition than all other falcons or hawks other than the Harris's hawk.  They are also long lived and highly disease resistant, allowing a falconer to maintain a red-tailed hawk as a hunting companion for potentially up to two decades.  There are fewer than 5,000 falconers in the United States, so despite their popularity any effect on the red-tailed hawk population, estimated to be about one million in the United States, is negligible. 
Not being as swift as falcons or accipiters, red-tailed hawks are usually used to hunt small game such as rabbits and squirrels, as well as larger quarry such as Hares. However, some individuals may learn to ambush game birds on the ground before they are able to take off and accelerate to full speed, or as they have fly into cover after a chase. Some have even learned to use a falcon-like diving stoop to capture challenging game birds such as pheasants in open country.
In the course of a typical hunt, a falconer using a red-tailed hawk most commonly releases the hawk and allows it to perch in a tree or other high vantage point. The falconer, who may be aided by a dog, then attempts to flush prey by stirring up ground cover. A well-trained red-tailed hawk will follow the falconer and dog, realizing that their activities produce opportunities to catch game. Once a raptor catches game, it does not bring it back to the falconer. Instead, the falconer must locate the bird and its captured prey, "make in" (carefully approach) and trade the bird off its kill in exchange for a piece of offered meat.  
The feathers and other parts of the red-tailed hawk are considered sacred to many American indigenous people and, like the feathers of the bald eagle and golden eagle, are sometimes used in religious ceremonies and found adorning the regalia of many Native Americans in the United States; these parts, most especially their distinctive tail feathers, are a popular item in the Native American community.  As with the other two species, the feathers and parts of the red-tailed hawk are regulated by the eagle feather law,  which governs the possession of feathers and parts of migratory birds. 
- BirdLife International. (2016). Buteo jamaicensis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. doi: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-3.RLTS.T22695933A93534834.en.
- Ferguson-Lees, J.; Christie, D. (2001). Raptors of the World. London: Christopher Helm. ISBN 978-0-7136-8026-3.
- "Red-tailed Hawk". All About Birds. Cornell University. Retrieved 16 May 2011.
- Preston, C. R. (2000). Red-tailed Hawk. Stackpole Books.
- Palmer, R. S., ed. (1988). Handbook of North American birds. Volume 5 Diurnal Raptors (part 2).
- Maxwell, Terry C. (2013). Wildlife of the Concho Valley. Texas A&M University Press. p. 148. ISBN 978-1-62349-006-5.
- "Red-tailed Hawk". Encyclopedia of Life. Retrieved 21 March 2012.
- Schmutz, J. K., Schmutz, S. M., & Boag, D. A. (1980). "Coexistence of three species of hawks (Buteo spp.) in the prairie–parkland ecotone". Canadian Journal of Zoology. 58 (6): 1075–1089. doi: 10.1139/z80-151. PMID 7427802.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Preston, C. R. and R. D. Beane. (2009). "Red-tailed Hawk (Buteo jamaicensis), The Birds of North America. doi: 10.2173/bna.52.
- Beebe, F. L. (1976). North American falconry and hunting hawks. Hancock House Books (British Columbia).
- "Red-tailed Hawk" (PDF). Bureau of Land Management. Retrieved 12 January 2010.
- Clark, W.S. (2014). HARLAN’S HAWK differs from RED-TAILED HAWK. Global Raptor Information Network.
- "Buteo jamaicensis". U.S. Geological Survey. Retrieved 5 June 2007.
- Dewey, T.; Arnold, D. "Buteo jamaicensis". Animal Diversity Web. Retrieved 5 June 2007.
- Brown, Leslie and Amadon, Dean (1986) Eagles, Hawks and Falcons of the World. The Wellfleet Press. ISBN 978-1555214722.
- Pearlstine, E. V., & Thompson, D. B. (2004). "Geographic variation in morphology of four species of migratory raptors". Journal of Raptor Research. 38: 334–342.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Fitzpatrick, B. M., & Dunk, J. R. (1999). "Ecogeographic variation in morphology of Red-tailed Hawks in western North America". Journal of Raptor Research. 33 (4): 305–312.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Meiri, S., & Dayan, T. (2003). "On the validity of Bergmann's rule". Journal of Biogeography. 30 (3): 331–351. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2003.00837.x.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Jaksić, F. M., & Carothers, J. H. (1985). "Ecological, Morphological, and Bioenergetic Correlates of Hunting Mode in Hawks and Owls". Ornis Scandinavica. 16 (3): 165–172. doi: 10.2307/3676627. JSTOR 3676627.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Hull, J. M.; Hull, A. C.; Sacks, B. N.; Smith, J. P.; Ernest, H. B. (2008). "Landscape characteristics influence morphological and genetic differentiation in a widespread raptor (Buteo jamaicensis)". Molecular Ecology. 17 (3): 810–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03632.x. PMID 18208488.
- del Hoyo, J.; Elliott, A.; Sargatal, J., eds. (1999). Handbook of the Birds of the World. 2. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions. ISBN 978-84-87334-15-3.
- Donohue, K. C., & Dufty, A. M. (2006). "Sex determination of Red‐tailed Hawks (Buteo jamaicensis calurus) using DNA analysis and morphometrics". Journal of Field Ornithology. 77 (1): 74–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1557-9263.2006.00003.x. JSTOR 27639302.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- "Buteos" (PDF). Alaska Department of Fish & Game. Retrieved 8 January 2018.
- Craighead, J. J. and F. C. Craighead, Jr. (1956). Hawks, owls and wildlife. Stackpole Co. Harrisburg, PA.
- Snyder, N. F. R. and Wiley, J. W. (1976). "Sexual size dimorphism in hawks and owls of North America". Ornithological Monographs, Vol. 20, pp. i–vi, 1–96.
- Schoenebeck, Casey W.; Turco, Matthew; Fahrlander, Rae M.; Darveau, Kaitlyn M.; Freeman, Thomas L. (2014). "Sex and Age Group Specific Changes in Body Condition of Red-tailed Hawks in Central Nebraska". The Wilson Journal of Ornithology. 126 (3): 575–580. doi: 10.1676/13-131.1.
- Steenhof, Karen; Kochert, Michael N. (1988). "Dietary Responses of Three Raptor Species to Changing Prey Densities in a Natural Environment". The Journal of Animal Ecology. 57 (1): 37–48. doi: 10.2307/4761. JSTOR 4761.
- Franson, J. C., Thomas, N. J., Smith, M. R., Robbins, A. H., Newman, S., & McCartin, P. C. (1996). "A retrospective study of postmortem findings in red-tailed hawks". Journal of Raptor Research. 30 (1): 7–14.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Imler, R. H. (1937). "Weights of some birds of prey of western Kansas" (PDF). Bird-banding. 8 (4): 166–169. doi: 10.2307/4509472. JSTOR 4509472.
- Red-tailed Hawk videos, photos and facts Archived 4 June 2012 at the Wayback Machine. Arkive.org. Retrieved 2012-08-22.
- Donohue, Kara C.; Dufty, Alfred M. (27 February 2006). "Sex Determination of Red-Tailed Hawks (Buteo jamaicensis calurus)". Scholarworks.boisestate.edu. 77: 74–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1557-9263.2006.00003.x. Retrieved 22 August 2012.
- Robbins, C. S., Bruun, B., & Zim, H. S. (2001). Birds of North America: a guide to field identification. Macmillan.
- Liguori, J. & Sullivan, B.L. (2010). "Comparison of Harlan's hawk with Eastern & Western Red-tailed Hawks". Birding: 30–37.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Brodkorb, P. (1964). Catalogue of fossil birds: Part 2 (Anseriformes through Galliformes). University of Florida.
- Lerner, H. R., Klaver, M. C., & Mindell, D. P. (2008). "Molecular phylogenetics of the Buteonine birds of prey (Accipitridae)" (PDF). The Auk. 125 (2): 304–315. doi: 10.1525/auk.2008.06161.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- de Oliveira, E. H. C., Tagliarini, M. M., dos Santos, M. S., O'Brien, P. C., & Ferguson-Smith, M. A. (2013). "Chromosome painting in three species of buteoninae: A cytogenetic signature reinforces the monophyly of South American species". PLOS ONE. 8 (7): e70071. Bibcode: 2013PLoSO...870071D. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070071. PMC 3724671. PMID 23922908.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Suarez, William (2004). "The Identity of the Fossil Raptor of the Genus Amplibuteo (Aves: Accipitridae) from the Quaternary of Cuba" (PDF). Caribbean Journal of Science. 40 (1): 120–125.
- "Buteo jamaicensis (J. F. Gmelin, 1788)". Integrated Taxonomic Information System. Retrieved 16 May 2011.
- Riesing, M. J., Kruckenhauser, L., Gamauf, A., & Haring, E. (2003). "Molecular phylogeny of the genus Buteo (Aves: Accipitridae) based on mitochondrial marker sequences". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 27 (2): 328–42. doi: 10.1016/S1055-7903(02)00450-5. PMID 12695095.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Johnson, N. K., & Peeters, H. J. (1963). "The systematic position of certain hawks in the genus Buteo". The Auk. 80 (4): 417–446. doi: 10.2307/4082848. JSTOR 4082848.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Clark, W. S. (1986). "What is Buteo ventralis?" (PDF). Birds Prey Bull. 3: 115–118.
- Clark, W. S. (2007). "Taxonomic status of the Forest Buzzard Buteo oreophilus trizonatus" (PDF). Ostrich. 78: 101–104. doi: 10.2989/OSTRICH.2007.78.1.16.60.
- Kruckenhauser, L., Haring, E., Pinsker, W., Riesing, M. J., Winkler, H., Wink, M., & Gamauf, A. (2004). "Genetic vs. morphological differentiation of Old World buzzards (genus Buteo, Accipitridae)". Zoologica Scripta. 33 (3): 197–211. doi: 10.1111/j.0300-3256.2004.00147.x.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- American Ornithologists' Union. 1998a. Check-list of North American birds. 7th edition ed. Washington, D.C.: American Ornithologists' Union.
- Tesky, Julie L. "Buteo jamaicensis". United States Department of Agriculture. Retrieved 10 June 2007.
- "Red-tailed Hawk" (PDF). Sky-hunters.org. Archived from the original (PDF) on 17 May 2008. Retrieved 16 June 2007.
- Pale Male – Introduction – Red-tailed Hawk in New York City | Nature. PBS (May 2004). Retrieved 2012-08-22.
- Geist, Bill (10 July 2003). "In Love With a Hawk". CBS. Retrieved 17 June 2007.
- Pale Male – the Central Park Red Tail Hawk website
- Winn, M. 1999. Red-tails in love. A Wildlife Drama in Central Park. New York, NY: Vintage Departures, Vintage Books, Random Haouse, Inc.
- Minor, W. F. & Minor, M. (1981). "Nesting of Red-tailed Hawks and Great Horned Owls in central New York suburban areas" (PDF). Kingbird. 31: 68–76.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Houston S. (1983). "Trees and the Red-tailed Hawk in southern Saskatchewan". Blue Jay. 41: 99–109.
- Bent, A. C. 1938. Life histories of North American birds of prey, Part 1. U.S. National Museum Bulletin 170:295–357.
- Garrigues, Jeff. "Biogeography of Red-tailed hawk". San Francisco State University Department of Geography. Archived from the original on 12 October 2007. Retrieved 28 June 2007.
- Smith, E. L., Hoffman, S. W., Stahlecker, D. W., & Duncan, R. B. (1996). "Results of a raptor survey in southwestern New Mexico". J. Raptor Res. 30 (4): 183–188.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Vilella, F. J., & Nimitz, W. F. (2012). "Spatial Dynamics of the Red-Tailed Hawk in the Luquillo Mountains of Puerto Rico". The Wilson Journal of Ornithology. 124 (4): 758–766. doi: 10.1676/1559-4491-124.4.758.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Knight, R. L., & Temple, S. A. (1988). "Nest-Defense Behavior in the Red-Winged Blackbird". The Condor. 90 (1): 193–200. doi: 10.2307/1368448. JSTOR 1368448.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Chandler, C. R., & Rose, R. K. (1988). "Comparative Analysis of the Effects of Visual and Auditory Stimuli on Avian Mobbing Behavior". Journal of Field Ornithology. 59 (3): 269–277.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- McGowan, K. J. (2001). "Demographic and behavioral comparisons of suburban and rural American Crows". In Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Springer US. pp. 365–381. ISBN 978-1-4615-1531-9
- Brown, Eleanor D. (2010). "Functional interrelationships among the mobbing and alarm caws of Common Crows (Corvus brachyrhynchos)". Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie. 67 (1–4): 17–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1985.tb01375.x.
- Hamerstrom, F. (1957). "The Influence of a Hawk's Appetite on Mobbing". The Condor. 59 (3): 192–194. doi: 10.2307/1364723. JSTOR 1364723.
- Ballam, J. M. (1984). "The use of soaring by the Red-tailed Hawk (Buteo jamaicensis)". The Auk. 101 (3): 519–524. doi: 10.1093/auk/101.3.519. JSTOR 4086604.
- Corvidae, Elaine L.; Bierregaard, Richard O.; Peters, Susan E. (2006). "Comparison of wing morphology in three birds of prey: Correlations with differences in flight behavior" (PDF). Journal of Morphology. 267 (5): 612–622. doi: 10.1002/jmor.10425. PMID 16477604.
- Day, Leslie. "The City Naturalist – Red Tailed Hawk". 79th Street Boat Basin Flora and Fauna Society. Archived from the original on 27 June 1997. Retrieved 17 June 2007.
- Knight, R. L., Andersen, D. E., Bechard, M. J., & Marr, N. V. (2008). "Geographic variation in nest‐defence behaviour of the Red‐tailed Hawk Buteo jamaicensis" (PDF). Ibis. 131: 22–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.1989.tb02739.x.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- "Red-Tailed Hawk". Oregon Zoo. Archived from the original on 6 August 2007. Retrieved 16 June 2007.
- "Red-tailed Hawk – Buteo jamaicensis". The Hawk Conservancy Trust. Retrieved 5 June 2007.
- "San Diego Zoo's Animal Bytes: Red-Tailed Hawk". San Diego Zoo. Retrieved 3 March 2012.
- "Raptor porn: The ridiculous proliferation of the red-tail call". Salon. 28 December 2013. Archived from the original on 28 December 2013.
- Lowe, C. 1978. Certain life history aspects of the Red-tailed Hawk, central Oklahoma and interior Alaska. Master's Thesis, Univ. Alaska, Fairbanks.
- Farmer, C. J., Bell, R. J., Drolet, B., Goodrich, L. J., Greenstone, E., Grove, D., & Sodergren, J. (2008). "Trends in autumn counts of migratory raptors in northeastern North America, 1974–2004" (PDF). Series in Ornithology. 3: 179–215.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Castaño R, A. M. & Colorado G.J. (2002). "First records of red-tailed hawk Buteo jamaicensis in Colombia". Cotinga. 18: 102.
- Haugh, J. R., & Cade, T. J. (1966). "The spring hawk migration around the southeastern shore of Lake Ontario". The Wilson Bulletin. 78 (1): 88–110. JSTOR 4159454.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Luttich, S. N., L. B. Keith and J. D. Stephenson (1971). "Population dynamics of the Red-tailed Hawk (Buteo jamaicensis) at Rochester, Alberta". Auk. 88 (1): 75–87. doi: 10.2307/4083962. JSTOR 4083962.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Steenhof, K., Kochert, M. N., & Moritsch, M. Q. (1984). "Dispersal and migration of southwestern Idaho raptors". Journal of Field Ornithology. 55 (3): 357–368. JSTOR 4512919.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Hoffman, S. W., Smith, J. P., & Meehan, T. D. (2002). "Breeding grounds, winter ranges, and migratory routes of raptors in the Mountain West". Journal of Raptor Research. 36 (2): 97–110.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Orians, Gordon; Kuhlman, Frank (1956). "Red-Tailed Hawk and Horned Owl Populations in Wisconsin". The Condor. 58 (5): 371–385. doi: 10.2307/1365056. JSTOR 1365056.
- Sherrod, S. K. (1978). "Diets of North American Falconiformes". Raptor Res. 12 (3/4): 49–121.
- Blumstein, D.T. (1986). The Diets and Breeding Biology of Red-tailed Hawks in Boulder County: 1985 Nesting Season. Colorado Division of Wildlife.
- Jaksić, Fabian M.; Braker, H. Elizabeth (1983). "Food-niche relationships and guild structure of diurnal birds of prey: Competition versus opportunism". Canadian Journal of Zoology. 61 (10): 2230–2241. doi: 10.1139/z83-295.
- Marti, Carl D.; Kochert, Michael N. (1995). "Are Red-tailed Hawks and Great Horned Owls diurnal–nocturnal dietary counterparts?". Wilson Bulletin. 107 (4): 615–628. JSTOR 4163598.
- Steenhof, K.; Kochert, M. N. (1985). "Dietary shifts of sympatric buteos during a prey decline". Oecologia. 66 (1): 6–16. Bibcode: 1985Oecol..66....6S. doi: 10.1007/BF00378546. PMID 28310806.
- Clark, W. S.; Galen, S. C.; Hull, J. M.; Mayo, M. A.; Witt, C. C. (2017). "Contrasting molecular and morphological evidence for the identification of an anomalous Buteo: a cautionary tale for hybrid diagnosis". PeerJ. 5: e2850. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2850. PMC 5228515. PMID 28097061.
- Restani, M. (1991). "Resource Partitioning among Three Buteo Species in the Centennial Valley, Montana". The Condor. 93 (4): 1007–1010. doi: 10.2307/3247736. JSTOR 3247736.
- Sarasola, J. H., & Negro, J. J. (2004). "Gender determination in the Swainson's Hawk (Buteo swainsoni) using molecular procedures and discriminant function analysis". Journal of Raptor Research. 38 (4): 357–361.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Fowler, D. W.; Freedman, E. A.; Scannella, J. B. (2009). "Predatory functional morphology in raptors: Interdigital variation in talon size is related to prey restraint and immobilisation technique". PLOS ONE. 4 (11): e7999. Bibcode: 2009PLoSO...4.7999F. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007999. PMC 2776979. PMID 19946365.
- Goslow, G. E. (1971). "The attack and strike of some North American raptors". The Auk. 88 (4): 815–827. doi: 10.2307/4083840. JSTOR 4083840.
- Marti, C. D., Korpimäki, E., & Jaksić, F. M. (1993). Trophic structure of raptor communities: a three-continent comparison and synthesis. In Current ornithology (pp. 47-137). Springer US.
- Orde, C. J., & Harrell, B. E. (1977). "Hunting techniques and predatory efficiency of nesting Red-tailed Hawks". Journal of Raptor Research. 11: 82–85.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Lee, Y. F., & Kuo, Y. M. (2001). "Predation on Mexican free-tailed bats by peregrine falcons and red-tailed hawks". Journal of Raptor Research. 35 (2): 115–123.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Twente, J. W. (1954). "Predation on bats by hawks and owls". The Wilson Bulletin. 66 (2): 135–136. JSTOR 4158291.
- Mikula, P., Morelli, F., Lučan, R. K., Jones, D. N., & Tryjanowski, P. (2016). "Bats as prey of diurnal birds: a global perspective". Mammal Review. 46 (3): 160–174. doi: 10.1111/mam.12060.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Santana, E., & Temple, S. A. (1988). "Breeding Biology and Diet of Red-Tailed Hawks in Puerto Rico". Biotropica. 20 (2): 151–160. doi: 10.2307/2388188. JSTOR 2388188.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Goss, N. S. (1891). History of the Birds of Kansas. Geo. W. Crane and Co., Topeka, Kansas.
- Jehl, J. R., & Parkes, K. C. (1982). "The status of the avifauna of the Revillagigedo Islands, Mexico". Wilson Bull. 94 (1): 1–19. JSTOR 4161573.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Richter R. (1985). "Red-tailed Hawk drowns Yellow-crowned Night Heron". Florida Field Naturalist. 13: 12–13.
- Turner, Ashley S.; Conner, L. Mike; Cooper, Robert J. (2008). "Supplemental Feeding of Northern Bobwhite Affects Red-Tailed Hawk Spatial Distribution". Journal of Wildlife Management. 72 (2): 428–432. doi: 10.2193/2006-303. JSTOR 25097557.
- Stalling, D. T. (1997). "Reithrodontomys humulis". Mammalian Species. 565 (565): 1–6. doi: 10.2307/3504466. JSTOR 3504466.
- Aschemeier, L. M., & Maher, C. R. (2011). "Eavesdropping of woodchucks (Marmota monax) and eastern chipmunks (Tamias striatus) on heterospecific alarm calls". Journal of Mammalogy. 92 (3): 493–499. doi: 10.1644/09-MAMM-A-322.1.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Reich, L. M. (1981). "Microtus pennsylvanicus". Mammalian Species. 159 (159): 1–8. doi: 10.2307/3503976. JSTOR 3503976.
- English, P. F. (1934). "Some observations on a pair of Red-tailed Hawks". The Wilson Bulletin. 46 (4): 228–235. JSTOR 4156331.
- Fitch, H. S., & Bare, R. O. (1978). "A field study of the Red-tailed Hawk in eastern Kansas". Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science. 81 (1): 1–13. doi: 10.2307/3627354. JSTOR 3627354.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Baumgardner, Denis J.; Ward, Susan E.; Dewsbury, Donald A. (1980). "Diurnal patterning of eight activities in 14 species of muroid rodents". Animal Learning & Behavior. 8 (2): 322–330. doi: 10.3758/BF03199612.
- Dark, J., & Zucker, I. (1983). "Short photoperiods reduce winter energy requirements of the meadow vole, Microtus pennsylvanicus". Physiology & Behavior. 31 (5): 699–702. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9384(83)80006-7. PMID 6364189.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Smith, D. G., & Murphy, J. R. (1973). "Breeding ecology of raptors in the eastern Great Basin of Utah". Brigham Young University Science Bulletin, Biological Series. 18 (3).CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Verts, B. J., & Carraway, L. N. (1999). "Thomomys talpoides". Mammalian Species. 618 (618): 1–11. doi: 10.2307/3504451. JSTOR 3504451.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Howard, W., & Childs, H. (1959). "Ecology of pocket gophers with emphasis on Thomomys bottae mewa". Hilgardia. 29 (7): 277–358. doi: 10.3733/hilg.v29n07p277.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Armitage, K. B. (1981). "Sociality as a life-history tactic of ground squirrels". Oecologia. 48 (1): 36–49. Bibcode: 1981Oecol..48...36A. doi: 10.1007/BF00346986. PMID 28309931.
- Daan, S., Barnes, B. M., & Strijkstra, A. M. (1991). "Warming up for sleep? Ground squirrels sleep during arousals from hibernation". Neuroscience Letters. 128 (2): 265–8. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(91)90276-Y. PMID 1945046.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Owings, D. H., Borchert, M., & Virginia, R. (1977). "The behaviour of California ground squirrels". Animal Behaviour. 25: 221–230. doi: 10.1016/0003-3472(77)90085-9.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Wilson, D. R., & Hare, J. F. (2004). "Animal communication: Ground squirrel uses ultrasonic alarms" (PDF). Nature. 430 (6999): 523. Bibcode: 2004Natur.430..523W. doi: 10.1038/430523a. PMID 15282596.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Fitch, H. S., Swenson, F., & Tillotson, D. F. (1946). "Behavior and food habits of the Red-tailed Hawk". The Condor. 48 (5): 205–237. doi: 10.2307/1363939. JSTOR 1363939.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Tromborg, C. T., & Coss, R. G. (2015). "Isolation rearing reveals latent antisnake behavior in California ground squirrels (Otospermophilus becheeyi) searching for predatory threats" (PDF). Animal Cognition. 18 (4): 855–65. doi: 10.1007/s10071-015-0853-5. PMID 25726178.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Rickart, E. A. (1987). "Spermophilus townsendii". Mammalian Species. 268: 1–6.
- Fitzner, R. E., Rickard, W. H., Cadwell, L. L., & Rogers, L. E. (1981). Raptors of the Hanford site and nearby areas of southcentral Washington (No. PNL-3212). Battelle Pacific Northwest Labs., Richland, WA (USA).
- Seidensticker, J. C. (1970). "Food of nesting Red-tailed Hawks in south-central Montana". The Murrelet. 51 (3): 38–40. doi: 10.2307/3534043. JSTOR 3534043.
- Michener, G. R., & Koeppl, J. W. (1985). "Spermophilus richardsonii". Mammalian Species (243): 1–6. doi: 10.2307/3503990. JSTOR 3503990.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Luttich, S., Rusch, D. H., Meslow, E. C., & Keith, L. B. (1970). "Ecology of Red-Tailed Hawk Predation in Alberta". Ecology. 51 (2): 190–203. doi: 10.2307/1933655. JSTOR 1933655.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Errington, P. L., & Breckenridge, W. J. (1938). "Food habits of Buteo hawks in north-central United States". The Wilson Bulletin. 50 (2): 113–121. JSTOR 4156719.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Wootton, J. T. (1987). "The Effects of Body Mass, Phylogeny, Habitat, and Trophic Level on Mammalian Age at First Reproduction". Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution. 41 (4): 732–749. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1987.tb05849.x. PMID 28564349.
- Doyle, F. I. (2001). Timing of reproduction by red-tailed hawks, northern goshawks and great horned owls in the Kluane Boreal Forest of Southwestern Yukon. PhD Thesis. University of British Columbia.
- Springer, Mark Andrew; Kirkley, John Stephen (1978). "Inter and Intraspecific interactions between Red-Tailed Hawks and Great Horned Owls in Central Ohio". The Ohio Journal of Science. 78 (6): 323–328. hdl: 1811/22576.
- Blumstein, D. T. (1989). "Food habits of red-tailed hawks in Boulder County, Colorado". J. Raptor Res. 23: 53–55.
- White, C. R., & Seymour, R. S. (2003). "Mammalian basal metabolic rate is proportional to body mass2/3". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 100 (7): 4046–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0436428100. PMC 153045. PMID 12637681.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Chapman, J. A. (1974). "Sylvilagus bachmani". Mammalian Species. 34 (34): 1–4. doi: 10.2307/3503777. JSTOR 3503777.
- Cervantes, F. A. (1997). "Sylvilagus graysoni". Mammalian Species. 559: 1–3.
- Green, J. S., & Flinders, J. T. (1980). "Brachylagus idahoensis". Mammalian Species. 125 (125): 1–4. doi: 10.2307/3503856. JSTOR 3503856.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Bond, B. T., Burger, Jr, L. W., Leopold, B. D., & Godwin, K. D. (2001). "Survival of cottontail rabbits (Sylvilagus floridanus) in Mississippi and an examination of latitudinal variation". The American Midland Naturalist. 145 (1): 127–136. doi: 10.1674/0003-0031(2001)145[0127:SOCRSF]2.0.CO;2. JSTOR 3083087.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Gatto, Angela E.; Grubb, Teryl G.; Chambers, Carol L. (2006). "Red-tailed Hawk dietary overlap with Northern Goshawks on the Kaibab Plateau, Arizona". Journal of Raptor Research. 39 (4): 439–444.
- Millsap, B. A. (1981). Distributional status of falconiformes in westcentral Arizona: with notes on ecology, reproductive success and management. US Bureau of Land Management, Phoenix District Office.
- Krebs, C. J., Boutin, S., & Boonstra, R. (2002). "Population Cycles in Ecosystem Context". Ecology. 83 (7): 2064–2065. doi: 10.2307/3071790. JSTOR 3071790.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Smith, A. T., & Weston, M. L. (1990). "Ochotona princeps". Mammalian Species. 352 (352): 1–8. doi: 10.2307/3504319. JSTOR 3504319.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC). COSEWIC Assessment and Update Status Report on the Townsend's Mole in Canada. 0-662-33588-0. Ottawa: Environment Canada. 2003.
- Carraway, L. N., Alexander, L. F., & Verts, B. J. (1993). "Scapanus townsendii". Mammalian Species. 434: 1–7.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- McCay, T. S. (2001). "Blarina carolinensis". Mammalian Species. 673: 1–7. doi: 10.1644/1545-1410(2001)673<0001:BC>2.0.CO;2.
- "Study of North Virginia Ecology". Fairfax County Public Schools. Retrieved 8 January 2018.
- Wilkins, K. T. (1989). "Tadarida brasiliensis". Mammalian Species. 331 (331): 1–10. doi: 10.2307/3504148. JSTOR 3504148.
- McDonough, C. M., & Loughry, W. J. (2013). The nine-banded armadillo: a natural history (Vol. 11). University of Oklahoma Press.
- Herlihy L. (2005). "Red-tailed Hawk and ferret encounter". New Hampshire Bird Records. 23: 48–49.
- Bildstein, K. L. (1987). Behavioral ecology of red-tailed hawks (Buteo jamaicensis), rough-legged hawks (Buteo lagopus), northern harriers (Circus cyaneus), and American kestrels (Falco sparverius) in south central Ohio (No. 04; USDA, QL696. F3 B5.).
- Hass, C. C., & Valenzuela, D. (2002). "Anti-predator benefits of group living in white-nosed coatis (Nasua narica)". Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 51 (6): 570–578. doi: 10.1007/s00265-002-0463-5.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Hall, L. K., Day, C. C., Westover, M. D., Edgel, R. J., Larsen, R. T., Knight, R. N., & McMillan, B. R. (2013). "Vigilance of kit foxes at water sources: A test of competing hypotheses for a solitary carnivore subject to predation". Behavioural Processes. 94: 76–82. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2012.12.007. PMID 23305800.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Barney, M.D. (1959). "Red-tailed hawk killing a lamb". Condor. 61: 157–158.
- Holdermann, D.A. & Holdermann, C.E. (1993). "Immature Red-tailed Hawk captures Montezuma Quail". NMOS Bulletin. 21: 31–33.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Rollins, D., Taylor, B. D., Sparks, T. D., Buntyn, R. J., Lerich, S. E., Harveson, L. A., Waddell, T.E. & Scott, C. B. (2009). "Survival of female scaled quail during the breeding season at three sites in the Chihuahuan Desert". In National Quail Symposium Proceedings. Vol. 6, No. 1, p. 48.
- McCluskey C. (1979). "Red-tailed Hawk preys on adult Sage Grouse in northern Utah". Raptor Research. 13: 123.
- Conover, M. R., & Borgo, J. S. (2009). "Do Sharp-Tailed Grouse Select Loafing Sites to Avoid Visual or Olfactory Predators". Journal of Wildlife Management. 73 (2): 242–247. doi: 10.2193/2008-049.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Wolfe, D. H., Patten, M. A., Shochat, E., Pruett, C. L., & Sherrod, S. K. (2007). "Causes and patterns of mortality in lesser prairie-chickens Tympanuchus pallidicinctus and implications for management". Wildlife Biology. 13: 95–104. doi: 10.2981/0909-6396(2007)13[95:CAPOMI]2.0.CO;2.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Zwickel, Fred C. and James F. Bendell. (2018). "Sooty Grouse (Dendragapus fuliginosus)". In The Birds of North America. doi: 10.2173/bna.soogro1.02.1
- Martin, K., Leslie A. Robb, Scott Wilson and Clait E. Braun. (2015). "White-tailed Ptarmigan (Lagopus leucura)". In The Birds of North America. doi: 10.2173/bna.68
- Johnson, Jeff A., Michael A. Schroeder and Leslie A. Robb. (2011). "Greater Prairie-Chicken (Tympanuchus cupido)". In The Birds of North America. doi: 10.2173/bna.36
- "Sage Grouse Behavior". The Sage Grouse Initiative. Retrieved 8 January 2018.
- Gates, J. M. (1972). "Red-tailed hawk populations and ecology in east-central Wisconsin". The Wilson Bulletin. 84 (4): 421–433. JSTOR 4160255.
- Fisher, R. J., & Wiebe, K. L. (2006). "Breeding dispersal of Northern Flickers Colaptes auratus in relation to natural nest predation and experimentally increased perception of predation risk". Ibis. 148 (4): 772–781. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.2006.00582.x.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Fisher, R. J., & Wiebe, K. L. (2006). "Nest site attributes and temporal patterns of northern flicker nest loss: Effects of predation and competition". Oecologia. 147 (4): 744–53. Bibcode: 2006Oecol.147..744F. doi: 10.1007/s00442-005-0310-2. PMID 16323016.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Brooks, A. (1944). "A deplumed Pileated Woodpecker". Condor. 46 (3): 124–130. doi: 10.2307/1364279. JSTOR 1364279.
- Knight, R. L., & Kawashima, J. Y. (1993). "Responses of Raven and Red-Tailed Hawk Populations to Linear Right-of-Ways". The Journal of Wildlife Management. 57 (2): 266–271. doi: 10.2307/3809423. JSTOR 3809423.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Wiley, J. W., & Wiley, B. N. (1979). "The biology of the White-crowned Pigeon". Wildlife Monographs, (64), 3–54.
- Snyder, L.L. (1926). "Belted Kingfisher preyed upon by Red-tailed Hawk". Auk. 43 (1): 97–98. doi: 10.2307/4075306. JSTOR 4075306.
- Rodriguez-Estrella, R., de la Luz, J. L. L., Breceda, A., Castellanos, A., Cancino, J., & Llinas, J. (1996). "Status, density and habitat relationships of the endemic terrestrial birds of Socorro Island, Revillagigedo Islands, Mexico". Biological Conservation. 76 (2): 195–202. doi: 10.1016/0006-3207(95)00104-2.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Snyder, Noel F., Ernesto C. Enkerlin-Hoeflich and M. A. Cruz-Nieto. (1999). "Thick-billed Parrot (Rhynchopsitta pachyrhyncha)". In The Birds of North America. doi: 10.2173/bna.406
- Martınez-Gomez, J. E., & Jacobsen, J. K. (2004). "The conservation status of Townsend's shearwater Puffinus auricularis auricularis". Biological Conservation. 116: 35–47. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00171-X.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Evens, J. G., & Thorne, K. M. (2015). "Case Study, California Black Rail (Laterallus jamaicensis corturniculus)". Science Foundation Chapter 5, Appendix 5.1 in The Baylands and climate change: What can we do?. California State Coastal Conservancy.
- Page, Gary W., Lynne E. Stenzel, J. S. Warriner, J. C. Warriner and P. W. Paton. (2009). "Snowy Plover (Charadrius nivosus)". In The Birds of North America. doi: 10.2173/bna.154
- Jehl Jr, J. R. (2004). "Foraging by a Red-tailed Hawk along a Wetland Edge: How Large a Duck can be Captured?". The Wilson Bulletin. 116 (4): 354–356. doi: 10.1676/04-040. JSTOR 4164700.
- Jónsson, J. E., & Afton, A. D. (2008). "Lesser Snow Geese and Ross's Geese form mixed flocks during winter but differ in family maintenance and social status". The Wilson Journal of Ornithology. 120 (4): 725–731. doi: 10.1676/07-124.1.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Callaghan, C. T., & Brooks, D. M. (2016). "Ecology, behavior, and reproduction of invasive Egyptian Geese (Alopochen aegyptiaca) in Texas". Bulletin of the Texas Ornithological Society. 49: 37–45.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Christensen, Glen C. (1998). "Himalayan Snowcock (Tetraogallus himalayensis)". In The Birds of North America. doi: 10.2173/bna.328
- Cherry, M.J., Lane, V.R., Warren, R.J. & Conner, L.M. (2011). "Red-tailed hawk attacks Wild Turkey on bait: Can Baiting Affect Predation Risk?". The Oriole. 77: 19–24.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Hargrave, L.L. (1935). "Red-tailed hawk kills young turkey". Condor. 37 (2): 83. doi: 10.2307/1363880. JSTOR 1363880.
- Mitchell, Carl D. and Michael W. Eichholz. (2010). "Trumpeter Swan (Cygnus buccinator)". In The Birds of North America. doi: 10.2173/bna.105
- Gerber, Brian D., James F. Dwyer, Stephen A. Nesbitt, Rod C. Drewien, Carol D. Littlefield, T. C. Tacha and P. A. Vohs. (2014). "Sandhill Crane (Antigone canadensis)". In The Birds of North America. doi: 10.2173/bna.31
- Fisher, A. K. (1893). Hawks and owls of the United States in their relation to agriculture. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture Bull. 3. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
- Knight, R. L., & Erickson, A. W. (1976). "High incidence of snakes in the diet of nesting red-tailed hawks". Raptor Res. 10: 108–111.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Iverson, J. B., Young, C. A., & Akre, T. S. (2008). "Body Size and Growth in the Bullsnake (Pituophis catenifer sayi) in the Nebraska Sandhills". Journal of Herpetology. 42 (3): 501–507. doi: 10.1670/07-030.1. JSTOR 40060543.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Guthrie, J. E. (1932). "Snakes versus birds; birds versus snakes". The Wilson Bulletin. 44 (2): 88–113. JSTOR 4156082.
- Carfagno, G. L., & Weatherhead, P. J. (2008). "Energetics and space use: Intraspecific and interspecific comparisons of movements and home ranges of two Colubrid snakes". The Journal of Animal Ecology. 77 (2): 416–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01342.x. PMID 18254921.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Linzey, D.W. & Clifford, M.J. (1981). Snakes of Virginia. Univ. of Virginia Press, Charlottesville, VA.
- Dorcas, M. E., Hopkins, W. A., & Roe, J. H. (2004). "Effects of body mass and temperature on standard metabolic rate in the eastern diamondback rattlesnake (Crotalus adamanteus)". Copeia. 2004: 145–151. doi: 10.1643/CP-03-074R1.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Kendrick, M. M., & Mengak, M. T. (2010). Eastern Indigo Snake (Drymarchon couperi). Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, The University of Georgia.
- Hollingsworth, B. D. (1998). "The systematics of chuckwallas (Sauromalus) with a phylogenetic analysis of other iguanid lizards". Herpetological Monographs, pp. 38–191.
- Cooper Jr, W., Van Wyk, J. H., Mouton, P. L. F., Al-Johany, A. M., Lemos-Espinal, J. A., Paulissen, M. A., & Flowers, M. (2000). "Lizard antipredatory behaviors preventing extraction from crevices". Herpetologica. 56 (3): 394–401. JSTOR 3893416.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Butler, M. A., & Losos, J. B. (2002). "Multivariate Sexual Dimorphism, Sexual Selection, and Adaptation in Greater Antillean Anolis Lizards". Ecological Monographs. 72 (4): 541–559. doi: 10.1890/0012-9615(2002)072[0541:MSDSSA]2.0.CO;2.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Powell, R. & Henderson, R.W. (2008). "Avian predators of West Indian reptiles" (PDF). Iguana. 15 (1): 9–12.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Blázquez, M. C., Rodríguez‐Estrella, R., & Delibes, M. (2010). "Escape behavior and predation risk of mainland and island spiny‐tailed iguanas (Ctenosaura hemilopha)". Ethology. 103 (12): 990–998. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1997.tb00141.x. hdl: 10261/39766.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Meiri, S. (2010). "Length-weight allometries in lizards" (PDF). Journal of Zoology. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2010.00696.x.
- Fitzpatrick, J. W., & Woolfenden, G. E. (1978). "Red-tailed hawk preys on juvenile gopher tortoise". Florida Field Naturalist. 6: 49.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Frost, D.R., Grant, T., Faivovich, J., Bain, R.H., Haas, A., Haddad, C.F.B., De Sá, R.O., Channing, A., Wilkinson, M., Donnellan, S.C., Raxworthy, C.J., Campbell, J.A., Blotto, B.L., Moler, P., Drewes, R.C., Nussbaum, R.A., Lynch, J.D., Green, D.M., Ward, C., Wheeler, W.C. (2006). "The Amphibian Tree of Life". Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History. 297: 1–291. doi: 10.1206/0003-0090(2006)297[0001:TATOL]2.0.CO;2. hdl: 2246/5781.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- La Rivers, I. (1941). "The Mormon cricket as food for birds". The Condor. 43 (1): 65–69. doi: 10.2307/1364022. JSTOR 1364022.
- Munro, J. A. (1929). "Notes on the food habits of certain raptors in British Columbia and Alberta". The Condor. 31 (3): 112–116. doi: 10.2307/1363092. JSTOR 1363092.
- Fraiola, K. M. S. (2006). Juvenile Epilobocera sinuatifrons growth rates and ontogenetic shifts in feeding in wild populations. PhD Thesis, UGA.
- Tepper, J. M. (2015). "Predators of koi". In 40th World Small Animal Veterinary Association Congress, Bangkok, Thailand, 15–18 May 2015. Proceedings book. pp. 349–350. World Small Animal Veterinary Association.
- Stalmaster, M. V. (1980). "Salmon carrion as a winter food source for red-tailed hawks". The Murrelet: 43–44.
- Johnsgard, P. A. (1990). Hawks, eagles, & falcons of North America: biology and natural history. Smithsonian Institution.
- Janes, S. W. (1984). "Influences of Territory Composition and Interspecific Competition on Red-Tailed Hawk Reproductive Success". Ecology. 65 (3): 862–870. doi: 10.2307/1938060. JSTOR 1938060.
- Thurow, T. L., & White, C. M. (1983). "Nest site relationship between the ferruginous hawk and Swainson's hawk". Journal of Field Ornithology. 54 (4): 401–406. JSTOR 27639274.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Woffinden, N. D., & Murphy, J. R. (1989). "Decline of a Ferruginous Hawk Population: A 20-Year Summary". The Journal of Wildlife Management. 53 (4): 1127–1132. doi: 10.2307/3809619. JSTOR 3809619.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Livezey KB (2009). "Range expansion of Barred Owls, part I: chronology and distribution". American Midland Naturalist. 161 (1): 49–56. doi: 10.1674/0003-0031-161.1.49. JSTOR 20491416.
- Livezey KB (2009). "Range expansion of Barred Owls, part 2: facilitating ecological changes". American Midland Naturalist. 161 (2): 323–349. doi: 10.1674/0003-0031-161.2.323. JSTOR 20491442.
- Livezey KB (2010). "Killing barred owls to help spotted owls II: implications for many other range-expanding species". Northwestern Naturalist. 91 (3): 251–270. doi: 10.1898/NWN09-38.1. JSTOR 40983223.
- England, A. S., Bechard, M. J., & Houston, C. S. (1997). Swainson's hawk. American Ornithologists' Union.
- Janes, S. W. (1985). INTERSPECIFIC INTERACTIONS AMONG GRASSLAND AND SHRUBSTEPPE RAPTORS: THE SMALLER SPECIES WINS. Behavioral interactions and habitat relations among grassland and shrubsteppe raptors, 7.
- Janes, S. W. (1994). "Partial Loss of Red-Tailed Hawk Territories to Swainson's Hawks: Relations to Habitat". The Condor. 96 (1): 52–57. doi: 10.2307/1369063. JSTOR 1369063.
- Mindell, D.P. (1983). Nesting raptors in southwestern Alaska: Status, distribution, and aspects of biology. Alaska Technical Report 8. Anchorage: Bureau of Land Management.
- Bohall, P. G., & Collopy, M. W. (1984). "Seasonal abundance, habitat use, and perch sites of four raptor species in north-central Florida". Journal of Field Ornithology. 55: 181–189.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Mader, W. J. (1978). "A comparative nesting study of red-tailed hawks and Harris' hawks in southern Arizona". The Auk. 95 (2): 327–337. JSTOR 4085450.
- Stevenson, J. O., & Meitzen, L. H. (1946). "Behavior and food habits of Sennett's White-tailed Hawk in Texas". The Wilson Bulletin. 58 (4): 198–205. JSTOR 4157521.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Bildstein, K. L. (1988). "Northern Harrier Circus cyaneus". In Handbook of North American birds. R. S. Palmer, ed. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press. pp. 251–303
- Kenward, Robert (2006). The Goshawk. London, UK: T & A D Poyser. p. 274. ISBN 978-0-7136-6565-9.
- Golet, G. H., Golet, H. T., & Colton, A. M. (2003). "Immature Northern Goshawk captures, kills, and feeds on adult-sized wild turkey". Journal of Raptor Research. 37 (4): 337–340.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Tornberg, R. (2001). "Pattern of goshawk Accipiter gentilis predation on four forest grouse species in northern Finland". Wildlife Biology. 7 (4): 245–256. doi: 10.2981/wlb.2001.029.
- Tornberg, R., Mönkkönen, M., & Pahkala, M. (1999). "Changes in diet and morphology of Finnish goshawks from 1960s to 1990s". Oecologia. 121 (3): 369–376. Bibcode: 1999Oecol.121..369T. doi: 10.1007/s004420050941. PMID 28308326.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Smithers, B.L.; Boal, C.W.; Andersen, D.E. (2005). "Northern Goshawk diet in Minnesota: An analysis using video recording systems". Journal of Raptor Research. 39 (3): 264–273.
- Reynolds, R. T., Joy, S.M. & Leslie, D.G. (1994). "Nest productivity, fidelity, and spacing of northern goshawks in northern Arizona". Stud. Avian Biol. 16: 106–113.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Boal, C. W. (2005). "Productivity and mortality of northern goshawks in Minnesota". J. Raptor Res. 39 (3): 222–228.
- Voous, K.H. 1988. Owls of the Northern Hemisphere. The MIT Press, 0262220350.
- Jaksić, F. M., & Marti, C. D. (1984). Comparative food habits of Bubo owls in Mediterranean-type ecosystems. Condor, 288-296.
- Donázar, J. A., Hiraldo, F., Delibes, M., & Estrella, R. R. (1989). Comparative food habits of the Eagle Owl Bubo bubo and the Great Horned Owl Bubo virginianus in six Palearctic and Nearctic biomes. Ornis Scandinavica, 298-306.
- Cromrich, L. A., Holt, D. W., & Leasure, S. M. (2002). "Trophic niche of North American great horned owls". Journal of Raptor Research. 36 (1): 58–65.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- McInvaille, W. B. (1972). Predator-prey relations and breeding biology of the great horned owl and red-tailed hawk in central Alberta. University of Wisconsin-Madison.
- Wilson, P.W. & Grigsby, E.M. (1980). "Red-tailed Hawks Attack Great Horned Owl". Inland Bird Banding. 54: 80.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Smith, D. G. (1970). "Close nesting and aggression contacts between Great Horned Owls and Red-tailed Hawks". The Auk. 87 (1): 170–171. doi: 10.2307/4083679. JSTOR 4083679.
- Houston, C.S. (1975). "Close proximity of Red-tailed Hawk and Great Horned Owl nests". Auk. 92 (3): 612–614. doi: 10.2307/4084633. JSTOR 4084633.
- Petersen, L. (1979). Ecology of great horned owls and red-tailed hawks in southeastern Wisconsin (Technical Bulletin No. 111). Department of Natural Resources.
- Hagar Jr., D. C. (1957). "Nesting populations of red-tailed hawks and horned owls in central New York State". The Wilson Bulletin. 69 (3): 263–272. JSTOR 4158602.
- Fitch, H. S. (1947). "Predation by Owls in the Sierran Foothills of California". The Condor. 49 (4): 137–151. doi: 10.2307/1364108. JSTOR 1364108.
- Devers, Patrick K.; Koenen, Kiana & Krausman, Paul R. (2004). "Interspecific interactions between badgers and red-tailed hawks in the Sonoran Desert, southwestern Arizona". The Southwestern Naturalist. 49 (1): 109–111. doi: 10.1894/0038-4909(2004)049<0109:IIBBAR>2.0.CO;2. JSTOR 3672278.
- Langley, William (2001). "Competition between American crows and red-tailed hawks for a carcass: flock advantage". Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science. 104 (1–2): 28–30. doi: 10.1660/0022-8443(2001)104[0028:CBACAR]2.0.CO;2. JSTOR 3628087.
- Prior, K. A., & Weatherhead, P. J. (1991). "Competition at the carcass: Opportunities for social foraging by turkey vultures in southern Ontario". Canadian Journal of Zoology. 69 (6): 1550–1556. doi: 10.1139/z91-218.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Ruggiero, L. F., & Krebs, C. J. (1999). Habitat fragmentation and interspecific competition: implications for lynx conservation. Ecology and conservation of lynx in the United States.
- Coulson, J. O., Coulson, T. D., DeFrancesch, S. A., & Sherry, T. W. (2008). "Predators of the Swallow-Tailed Kite in Southern Louisiana and Mississippi". Journal of Raptor Research. 42: 1–12. doi: 10.3356/JRR-07-08.1.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Miller, K. E. (2005). "Red-tailed hawk depredates Mississippi kite nestling at dawn". Journal of Raptor Research. 39 (1): 108.
- Pinkston, D.R. & Caraviotis, J.G. (1980). "Probable predation on White-tailed Kite by Red-tailed Hawk". Raptor Research. 14: 85–86.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Klem, D., Hillegass, B. S., & Peters, D. A. (1985). "Raptors killing raptors". The Wilson Bulletin. 97 (2): 230–231. JSTOR 4162078.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Peyton, S. B. (1945). "From Field and Study". The Condor. 47 (4): 167–173. doi: 10.2307/1364172. JSTOR 1364172.
- Bibles, Brent D., Richard L. Glinski and R. Roy Johnson. (2002). "Gray Hawk (Buteo plagiatus). In The Birds of North America. doi: 10.2173/bna.652.
- Miller, S. J., Dykstra, C. R., Simon, M. M., Hays, J. L., & Bednarz, J. C. (2015). "Causes of Mortality and Failure at Suburban Red-Shouldered Hawk (Buteo lineatus) Nests". Journal of Raptor Research. 49 (2): 152–160. doi: 10.3356/0892-1016-49.2.152.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Hengstenberg, D. W., & Vilella, F. J. (2005). "Nesting ecology and behavior of Broad-winged Hawks in moist karst forests of Puerto Rico". Journal of Raptor Research. 39 (4): 404.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Bahm, M. A., & Sullivan, B. L. (2009). "Interspecific Depredation of Raptors by Red-Tailed Hawks (Buteo jamaicensis) on San Clemente Island, California". The Southwestern Naturalist. 54: 85–87. doi: 10.1894/MH-27.1.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Warkentin, I. G., N. S. Sodhi, R. H. M. Espie, Alan F. Poole, L. W. Oliphant and Paul C. James. (2005). "Merlin (Falco columbarius). In The Birds of North America. doi: 10.2173/bna.44.
- Le Duc, P. V. (1970). "Red-Tailed Hawk Attacks Bald Eagle". The Auk. 87 (3 (July–September)): 586. doi: 10.2307/4083809. JSTOR 4083809.
- Olendorff, R. R. (1976). "The Food Habits of North American Golden Eagles". American Midland Naturalist. 95 (1): 231–236. doi: 10.2307/2424254. JSTOR 2424254.
- Watson, J. W., Davison, M., & Leschner, L. L. (1993). "Bald eagles rear red-tailed hawks". Journal of Raptor Research. 27 (2): 126–127.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Perkins D.W., Phillips, D.M. & Garcelon, D.K. (1996). "Predation on a Bald Eagle nestling by a Red-tailed Hawk" (PDF). Journal of Raptor Research. 30: 249.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Wetmore, A., & Lincoln, F. C. (1933). "Additional notes on the birds of Haiti and the Dominican Republic". Proceedings of the United States National Museum. 82 (2966): 1–68. doi: 10.5479/si.00963801.82-2966.1.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- White, J., Kennedy, L. M., & Christie, M. E. (2017). "Do perceptions of the Red-tailed Hawk indicate a human-wildlife conflict on the island of la Gonave, Haiti?". Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography. 38 (2): 258–268. doi: 10.1111/sjtg.12189.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- "Red-tailed Hawk, Buteo jamaicensis". Study of Northern Virginia Ecology. Fairfax County Public Schools. Retrieved 16 May 2011.
- Rosen, P. C. (2000). A monitoring study of vertebrate community ecology in the northern Sonoran Desert, Arizona. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Doctorate thesis, University of Arizona.
- Wiley, J. W. (1975). "The nesting and reproductive success of Red-tailed Hawks and Red-shouldered Hawks in Orange County, California, 1973". The Condor. 77 (2): 133–139. doi: 10.2307/1365782. JSTOR 1365782.
- Seidensticker IV, J. C., & Reynolds III, H. V. (1971). "The nesting, reproductive performance, and chlorinated hydrocarbon residues in the Red-tailed Hawk and Great Horned Owl in south-central Montana". The Wilson Bulletin. 83 (4): 408–418. JSTOR 4160137.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Smith, R. N., Cain, S. L., Anderson, S. H., Dunk, J. R., & Williams, E. S. (1998). "Blackfly-induced mortality of nestling red-tailed hawks". The Auk. 115 (2): 368–375. doi: 10.2307/4089195. JSTOR 4089195.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Brugger, K. E. (1989). "Red-Tailed Hawk Dies with Coral Snake in Talons". Copeia. 1989 (2): 508–510. doi: 10.2307/1445456. JSTOR 1445456.
- Kaczmarczik, M. "Snake versus Hawk". Academic of Natural Sciences. Retrieved 8 January 2018.
- Terres, John K. (1980). The Audubon Society Encyclopedia of North American Birds. New York: Knopf. p. 1109. ISBN 978-0-394-46651-4.
- Anthony, A. W. (1893). Birds of San Pedro Mártir, Lower California. Zoe 4: 228–247.
- "Buteo jamaicensis". Oiseaux.net. Retrieved 7 June 2007.
- Stotz, N. (1994). "Unusual nesting attempt by Red-tailed Hawk". Kingbird. 44 (3): 818–820. JSTOR 23324537.
- Brubaker, D. L., K. L. Brubaker and B. C. Thompson (2003). "Raptor and Chihuahuan Raven nesting on decommissioned telephone-line poles in the northern Chihuahuan Desert". Journal of Raptor Research. 37 (2): 135–146.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Pinel, H. W. and C. A. Wallis (1972). "Unusual nesting records of Red-tailed Hawk in southern Alberta". Blue Jay. 30: 30–31.
- Smith, R. N., Anderson, S. H., Cain, S. L., & Dunk, J. R. (2003). "Habitat and nest-site use by Red-tailed Hawks in northwestern Wyoming". Journal of Raptor Research. 37 (3): 219–227.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Misztal, A. (1974). The population and nesting of Red-tailed Hawks and Great Horned Owls on the Wisconsin till plains of western Ohio. Master's Thesis, Ohio State Univ., Columbus.
- Titus, K., & Mosher, J. A. (1981). "Nest-site habitat selected by woodland hawks in the central Appalachians". The Auk. 98 (2): 270–281. JSTOR 4086065.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Gilmer, D. S., Konrad, P. M., & Stewart, R. E. (1983). "Nesting ecology of Red-tailed Hawks and Great Horned Owls in central North Dakota and their interactions with other large raptors". Prairie Naturalist. 15 (3): 133–143.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Smith, D. G. (1971). Population dynamics, habitat selection, and partitioining of breeding raptors in the eastern Great Basin of Utah. Ph.D. diss., Brigham Young Univ., Provo, UT.
- Tietje, W. D., Bloom, P. H., & Vreeland, J. K. (1997). Characteristics of red-tailed hawk nest sites in oak woodlands of central California. U S Forest Service General Technical Report PSW. no. 160 (December):365–372.
- Cornman, D. D. (1973). Red-tailed Hawk population ecology in Wood County, Ohio. Master's Thesis, Bowling Green State Univ., Bowling Green, OH.
- Luttich, S. N., Keith, L. B., & Stephenson, J. D. (1971). "Population dynamics of the Red-tailed Hawk (Buteo jamaicensis) at Rochester, Alberta". The Auk. 88 (1): 75–87. doi: 10.2307/4083962. JSTOR 4083962.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Henny, C. J., & Wight, H. M. (1972). Population ecology and environmental pollution: Red-tailed and Cooper's hawks (No. 2, pp. 229–250). US Fish and Wildlife Service.
- Baicich, P. J., & Harrison, C. J. O. (2005). Nests, eggs, and nestlings of North American birds. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. p. 480. ISBN 0691122954
- Harrison, H. H. (1979). A Field Guide to western bird's nests of 520 species found breeding in the United States west of the Mississippi River. Boston, MA: A Field Guide to western birds' nests.
- Hardy, R. (1939). "Nesting habits of the western Red-tailed Hawk". Condor. 41: 79–80.
- Springer, M. A., & Osborne, D. R. (1983). "Analysis of growth of the red-tailed hawk". Ohio J. Sci. 83: 13–19. hdl: 1811/22901.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Stinson, C. H. (1980). "Weather-Dependent Foraging Success and Sibling Aggression in Red-Tailed Hawks in Central Washington". The Condor. 82 (1): 76–80. doi: 10.2307/1366788. JSTOR 1366788.
- Wiley, J. W. (1975). "Three Adult Red-Tailed Hawks Tending a Nest". The Condor. 77 (4): 480–482. doi: 10.2307/1366096. JSTOR 1366096.
- "Bald eagle adopts 'mortal enemy' baby hawk". BBC. 9 June 2017. Retrieved 4 April 2018.
- "Why This Young Hawk Thinks It's an Eagle". National Geographic. 25 July 2017. Retrieved 4 April 2018.
- Johnson, S. J. (1973). "Post-fledging activity of the Red-tailed Hawk". Raptor Res. 7: 43–48.
- Johnson, S. J. (1986). "Development of hunting and self-sufficiency in juvenile Red-tailed Hawks (Buteo jamaicensis)". Raptor Res. 20: 29–34.
- Geller, G. A., & Temple, S. A. (1983). "Seasonal trends in body condition of juvenile Red-tailed Hawks during autumn migration". The Wilson Bulletin. 95 (3): 492–495. JSTOR 4161808.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Kessel, B., & Springer, H. K. (1966). "Recent Data on Status of Some Interior Alaska Birds". The Condor. 68 (2): 185–195. doi: 10.2307/1365717. JSTOR 1365717.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Brinker, D. F., & Erdman, T. C. (1985). "Characteristics of autumn Red-tailed Hawk migration through Wisconsin". In Proc. Hawk Migration Conf. Vol. 4, pp. 107–136.
- Millsap, B. A. (1981). Distributional status of falconiformes in west central Arizona: with notes on ecology, reproductive success and management. US Bureau of Land Management, Phoenix District Office.
- Janes, S. W. (1984). "Fidelity to Breeding Territory in a Population of Red-Tailed Hawks". The Condor. 86 (2): 200–203. doi: 10.2307/1367041. JSTOR 1367041.
- Gallardo, Julio C.; Vilella, Francisco J.; Colvin, Michael E. (2019). "A seasonal population matrix model of the Caribbean Red-tailed Hawk Buteo jamaicensis jamaicensis in eastern Puerto Rico". Ibis. 161 (2): 459–466. doi: 10.1111/ibi.12703. ISSN 1474-919X.
- Janik, C. A. & Mosher, J.A. (1982). "Breeding biology of raptors in the central Appalachians". Raptor Res. 16: 18–24.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Soucy, Jr., L. J. (1995). "Live recovery of a venerable raptor, a longevity record for the Red-tailed Hawk". North American Bird Bander. 20 (1): 26.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list ( link)
- Keran, D. (1981). "The incidence of man-caused and natural mortalities to raptors". Raptor Res. 15: 108–112.
- "Raptors and Rat Poison". allaboutbirds.org. 15 July 2015.
- Interested In Falconry. Colorado Hawking Club
- Beebe, Frank (1984). A Falconry Manual. Hancock House Publishers, ISBN 0-88839-978-2.
- "Migratory Bird Permits; Changes in the Regulations Governing Falconry; Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Assessment for Falconry and Raptor Propagation Activities; Proposed Rule and Notice". Department of the Interior: Fish and Wildlife Service. Archived from the original on 11 March 2007. Retrieved 14 June 2007.
- McGranaghan, Liam J. (2001). The Red-Tailed Hawk: A Complete Guide to Training and Hunting North America's Most Versatile Game Hawk. Western Sporting Publications. p. 181. ISBN 978-0-9709571-0-8.
- Collier, Julie (Spring 2003). "The Sacred Messengers". Cross Paths. 6 (1). Archived from the original on 24 January 2008. Retrieved 20 June 2007.
- "TITLE 50—Wildlife and Fisheries". Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (e-CFR). Archived from the original on 10 June 2007. Retrieved 20 June 2007.
- Cook, Stephen. "Feather Law". Mashantucket Pequot Museum. Retrieved 20 June 2007.
- Poole, A. F. (ed.). The Birds of North America. Ithaca, NY, USA: Cornell Lab of Ornithology.
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Buteo jamaicensis.|
|Wikispecies has information related to Buteo jamaicensis|
|Wikisource has original text related to this article:|
|Wikisource has original text related to this article:|
- Red-tailed hawk Species Account – Cornell Lab of Ornithology
- Red-tailed hawk – Buteo jamaicensis – USGS Patuxent Bird Identification InfoCenter
- Red-tailed hawk Pictures at Fordham University
- North American Falconers Association
- Comparison of Adult & Immature tails
- Discussion of Krider's and Harlan's forms and identification issues
- Photo Field Guide on Flickr
- "Red-tailed hawk" in The Encyclopedia of Life
- "Red-tailed hawk media". Internet Bird Collection.
- Red-tailed hawk photo gallery at VIREO (Drexel University)
- John James Audubon. The Red-tailed Hawk in Ornithological Biography vol. 1 (1831), pp. 265–272 (also on WikiSource, see right). The Red-tailed Buzzard in The Birds of America vol. 1 (1840), pp. 32–38. [The 1840 edition appears to be a combination of the two companion works from the early 1830s: the plates from Birds of America and the descriptions from Ornithological Biography.]
- John James Audubon. The Black Warrior in Ornithological Biography vol. 1 (1831), pp. 441–443 (also on WikiSource, see right). Harlan's Buzzard in The Birds of America vol. 1 (1840), pp. 38–40.