Majūs (
Arabic: مجوس or Magūs (
Persian: مگوش) was originally a term meaning
Zoroastrians, specifically priests.[1]
It was a technical term for the
magi,[2][3] and like its synonym gabr (of uncertain etymology) originally had no pejorative implications.[4] It is also translated as "
fire worshipper".[5]
This term was borrowed via
Imperial Aramaic: 𐡌𐡂𐡅𐡔𐡀, romanized: mḡušā from
Old Persian: 𐎶𐎦𐎢𐏁, romanized: maguš. It was also borrowed from Old Persian into
ancient Greek (plural μάγοιmágoi), which appears in
Matthew 2.[6]
The word is mentioned in
Quran 22:17: "Indeed, those who have believed and those who were
Jews and the
Sabians and the Christians and the Magians and those who associated with Allah - Allah will judge between them on the Day of Resurrection. Indeed Allah is, over all things, Witness".[7][8]
In the 1980s, majus was part of anti-Iranian propaganda of the
Iran–Iraq War to refer to Iranians.
By referring to the Iranians in these documents as majus, the security apparatus [implied] that the Iranians [were] not sincere Muslims, but rather covertly practice their pre-Islamic beliefs. Thus, in their eyes, Iraq’s war took on the dimensions of not only a struggle for Arab nationalism, but also a campaign in the name of Islam.[11]
Today the term majus is distinct from Arabic kafir "unbeliever". Persian gabr is no longer synonymous with majus.[4] Subsequent usage by
Sunni Muslims against
the Shi'a has meant that some people view the term as
anti-Shi'ism.[12]
^de Jong, Albert (2010).
Curtis, Vesta Sarkhosh; Stewart, Sarah (eds.).
Birth of the Persian Empire. Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 92.
ISBN978-0-85773-307-8. Most of our evidence for that later history comes from the Sasanian period (224–642 CE). In post-Sasanian Zoroastrian sources, the Pahlavi books, the word mogh (mgw), the Middle Persian descendant of Old Persian magu-, is hardly ever attested. Instead of this generic word, more specific titles are always given; where a generic word is necessary, the word mard, "man", is used.55 Since many reconstructions of Sasanian history are based on sources from later periods, the existence of the word in Sasanian Iran has sometimes been obscured. It is, however, not only frequently found in non-Iranian Sasanian sources (in Aramaic, Syriac and Greek), but it is also very well attested in the most reliable Iranian sources from the period itself, namely personal seals.56 In fact, the word mogh is a very common word on Sasanian seals and bullae. The word had a long and distinguished career in Islamic Persian poetry (pīr-e moghān etc),57 which shows that it had not disappeared from the common speech of the Persians. The question therefore arises why the Zoroastrians, who formulated their tradition in the 9th century, wanted to get rid of it, but so far no reasonable hypothesis has been suggested for this problem. The only suggestion one can think of that makes sense is the fact that the Aramaic word magūšā and the Arabic majūs were used not just to refer to Persian priests, but to Zoroastrians in general, and that the term came to be felt to be misleading for those who wanted to distinguish themselves as members of the priestly class.