From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Unfriendly Aliens

Unfriendly Aliens ( talk + · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log· investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected


08 April 2024

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Suspected sockpuppets

The IP has admitted to being Unfriendly Aliens, who was checkuser blocked last year [1]. The 6 month block on the IP has expired, and they made a post to AN claiming to be Aliens' Probes [2]. The obvious username and IP overlap make this a WP:DUCK.

Four of Sixteen Also claims to be Aliens' Probes on their userpage.

The edits from these new accounts seem to be a continuation of the disruption and messing about that started under their original accounts and the IP. 86.23.109.101 ( talk) 13:04, 8 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Four of Sixteen seems to be desperately trying to prove that he is not a sock in his contributions and his talk page. '''[[ User:CanonNi]]''' ( talk| contribs) 13:51, 8 April 2024 (UTC) reply

They don't seem to understand why they were blocked. They were initially blocked for trolling, disruption and generally being WP:NOTHERE under their account Nuclear Sergeant, then a checkuser blocked their other account and IP. They seem to be under the impression that they were blocked over some big misunderstanding about socking, when in truth they were blocked for being disruptive. 86.23.109.101 ( talk) 14:01, 8 April 2024 (UTC) reply
See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1135#User:Nuclear Sergeant 86.23.109.101 ( talk) 14:04, 8 April 2024 (UTC) reply
FoS has also started a question at the Teahouse, where he introduced fringe theories about insect aliens, which he later added to the article Unidentified flying object (later reverted). '''[[ User:CanonNi]]''' ( talk| contribs) 14:12, 8 April 2024 (UTC) reply
@ CanonNi I perfectly agree with @ 86.23.109.101's analysis. Kind regards 14 novembre ( talk) 🇮🇹 14:23, 8 April 2024 (UTC) reply
Me too. I've left notices on the suspected accounts. Perhaps they will join this discussion later. '''[[ User:CanonNi]]''' ( talk| contribs) 14:29, 8 April 2024 (UTC) reply
@ CanonNi Perfect. (I didn't see one and accidentally duplicated it). Kind regards 14 novembre ( talk) 🇮🇹 14:43, 8 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Could someone take a look at FoS' talk page? I honestly don't know what he's trying to say. Thanks. '''[[ User:CanonNi]]''' ( talk| contribs) 04:11, 9 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • Blocked both accounts indefinitely, and the IP for six months. Will leave this open for a CU. —  Ingenuity ( talk •  contribs) 15:19, 8 April 2024 (UTC) reply
  • Looks like these accounts have been checked already. Closing. Thanks, Spicy ( talk) 01:45, 9 April 2024 (UTC) reply