This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 4, 2022.
Kerotan MGS3
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguilltalk 17:31, 14 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Not mentioned in the target article.
Dominicmgm (
talk) 21:50, 21 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (
投稿) 23:06, 28 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete—this is not mentioned in the target article as it is a detail that is below the level of info granularity in that article. Would be a suitable redirect to a "list of creatures"-type article, though. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 00:48, 29 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Retarget to
Metal Gear Online which has multiple mentions of Kerotan. If there was a
Kerotan already, I would have supported deletion, but this is the best we have for now. Alternately move to Kerotan. Jay 💬 16:28, 4 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoristalk! 21:33, 4 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. Not mentioned at target, so no point in keeping. The proposed target above does mention Kerotan multiple times, but it does not mention a Kerotan MGS3, and it would be confusing to retarget there.
CycloneYoristalk! 00:45, 12 November 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Brüün, Jonathan
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗plicit 03:54, 11 November 2022 (UTC)reply
This is an unused redirect from a non-notable performer name, to a list of fictional characters that includes a character this individual played. —
TAnthonyTalk 19:59, 28 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment: I'm not sure at the moment, but I did find three more variations of this guy's name that I'll be adding here. Regards,
SONIC678 21:07, 28 October 2022 (UTC)reply
There was previously an article on the performer, hence the sort name redirect (Brüün, Jonathan). However, a sort name redirect need not exist if there is not a name to sort.
BD2412T 23:01, 28 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoristalk! 21:33, 4 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete the same person is also mentioned at
Oh No It Isn't!#Cast. Showing search results is more informative to readers than redirecting to any single work with which he's associated.
61.239.39.90 (
talk) 09:28, 5 November 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
NoCopyrightSound
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep.
(non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (
投稿) 22:25, 11 November 2022 (UTC)reply
@
AngusWOOF: How does NoCopyrightSound clutter search efforts? Jay 💬 18:42, 4 November 2022 (UTC)reply
It would attract more links going to NoCopyrightSound.
AngusW🐶🐶F (
bark •
sniff) 18:58, 4 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoristalk! 21:04, 4 November 2022 (UTC)reply
NoCopyrightSound has no incoming links. Are you saying that the presence of this redirect will make external websites start linking to the singular than the plural? Jay 💬 09:41, 5 November 2022 (UTC)reply
But isn't this true for every {{
R from singular}} redirect? And I think by search efforts for NCS, the nom is referring to search for NoCopyrightSounds, not the singular. Jay 💬 15:06, 6 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep as unclear nomination, and not per PizzaPlayer, since NoCopyrightSounds is a name which is in the plural, the singular does not make sense. Jay 💬 07:39, 11 November 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Protests against Daniel Ortega
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Comment@
NoonIcarus: I'm unclear what you're proposing here. Do you wish to move the current target to the redirect? -
Presidentmantalk ·
contribs (
Talkback) 20:46, 4 November 2022 (UTC)reply
There was an edit conflict as I wrote the comment at around the same time as you replied to the user above.
Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 21:40, 4 November 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
David Schloss's Death
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗plicit 23:56, 11 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Irrelevant, a David Schloss never died at Six Flags.
HarobouriT •
C (he/him) 19:13, 4 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete: Bizarre redirect... I can find nothing anywhere on the internet connecting even an incident involving someone named "David Schloss" and Six Flags.
TartarTorte 19:28, 4 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete: Same reason as listed above. I don't know who this person is or how he was connected to Six Flags. None of the incidents on the redirected page mention his name. The editor who created the redirect offered no explanation or notations.
—JlACEer (
talk) 23:49, 4 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete as apparently nonsensical redirect. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (
投稿) 02:36, 8 November 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Since it fails
WP:G3, which is a hoax, I decided to start a discussion for deletion per
WP:CRYSTALBALL and
WP:OR. Take note: There is no Yamaneko in the Western Pacific. HurricaneEdgar 15:54, 4 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Support per
WP:CRYSTALBALL. The system hasn't developed; why would an article be there in advance?
Sarrail (
talk) 16:02, 4 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Support this system should only be a draft for when it develops., and causing significant impacts for an article.
PopularGames (
talk) 16:50, 4 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Restore draft and send to
WP:MFDkeep. I'm not sure what the issue is with
WP:CRYSTALBALL since I don't see why it applies to a draft. If the nominators want the page deleted as a draft, restore it and send this to
WP:MFD. What is being proposed here is outside the scope of
WP:RFD and is, in a way, circumnavigating
WP:MFD.
Steel1943 (
talk) 03:13, 7 November 2022 (UTC)reply
The issue is here with the creator claiming, I think this storm might be catastrophic," and clearly
WP:CRYSTALBALL. HurricaneEdgar 13:05, 7 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Right, I get that, but this page is in the draft namespace, not the article namespace. Pages in the draft namespace are not considered articles and are
not indexed by search engines, meaning they will not pick up the existence of pages in the "draft" namespace. As
Pizzaplayer219 states below (and probably better than I could), article notability guidelines like
WP:CRYSTAL,
WP:NWX,
WP:OR, etc. don't apply as stringently to the "draft" namespace as they would the article namespace for various reasons ... including since drafts are works in progress where it is okay that they are wrong, as long as they get improved and not published as an article if
WP:CRYSTAL,
WP:NWX,
WP:OR, etc. would then apply to get it deleted.
Steel1943 (
talk) 17:00, 7 November 2022 (UTC)reply
The comments following mine have convinced me that sending this page to
WP:MFD immediately after this discussion may be premature, so that portion of my opinion has been struck.
Steel1943 (
talk) 18:09, 10 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Restore and keep:
WP:CRYSTAL doesn't apply to drafts, nor does
WP:NWX and
WP:OR (however
blatant hoaxes do apply). We should wait until
WP:G13 handles this draft or someone decides to edit this draft until the event comes. If this was sent to
MFD I’m pretty sure that the result would be keep.
Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 13:01, 7 November 2022 (UTC)reply
I share the opinion that a
WP:MFD discussion for the content at this redirect would result in "keep".
Steel1943 (
talk) 17:01, 7 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Restore: If there is no Tropical Storm Yamaneko in 2022, then the draft will like languish in draftspace and be quietly deleted per
WP:G13 in 6 months' time. If such a storm does exist, there is no reason to not use the article history provided. It seems that due to it not being in mainspace, there is no harm to a restoration which could trigged
WP:CRYSTAL in mainspace.
TartarTorte 18:48, 7 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Essentially, complete agree with Pizzaplayer
TartarTorte 18:49, 7 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Support this system doesn't even exist yet. There is no reason for an article to exist on a non-existing storm.
Hurricane Chandler (
talk) 23:43, 8 November 2022 (UTC)reply
It's not an article; it's a draft.
Steel1943 (
talk) 07:17, 9 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Support per Hurricane Chandler and Drdpw
Hurricane Su (
talk) 20:46, 9 November 2022 (UTC)reply
I'm trying to avoid
WP:BLUDGEON here, but it seems a point needs to be restated to every participant here stating "Support" since they are not familiar with how voting at RFD works and are probably more familiar with
WP:AFD: This redirect was a draft, not an article. See
WP:DRAFT.
Steel1943 (
talk) 04:32, 10 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Restore and keep per above, WP:CRYSTAL does not apply to drafts. Also,
Yamaneko is actually the next name to be used on the list of names for the 2022 Pacific typhoon season, so it won't be long before this draft could potentially be used for something.
CycloneYoristalk! 17:55, 10 November 2022 (UTC)reply
It appears the draft creator
GDFilbert03 wanted to have this speedy deleted, and added a {{
Speedy deletion}} tag, but it was declined as no reason was given. Filbert, if you wish to have it deleted, you must tag it as
WP:G7 (Author requests deletion). Jay 💬 17:39, 11 November 2022 (UTC)reply
(Update) as of November 12, Tropical Storm Yamaneko formed in the Pacific Ocean
according to JMA. HurricaneEdgar 13:31, 12 November 2022 (UTC)reply
And that is precisely why I supported keeping the draft, since it might end up being useful. This draft should definitely be kept now that Yamaneko has formed.
CycloneYoristalk! 20:39, 12 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Since the storms has formed I Withdrawn the nomination. HurricaneEdgar 23:50, 12 November 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Pittsburgh Reelers
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 15:58, 11 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Can find a couple uses as a joke on user-generated sites, but searching for this is primarily about dancing groups doing the Irish reel. Delete as not useful and essentially made-up.
Hog FarmTalk 15:44, 4 November 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Abundance and Redundancy
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 14:00, 11 November 2022 (UTC)reply
A piece of history here, but not a useful one. Created as an article in 2003, probably in error because it was very quickly redirected to
Wikipedia:Abundance and redundancy, and in 2007 redirected to the disambiguation page
Redundancy, which is not helpful. I think we should Delete.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 14:00, 4 November 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
CAT:MAZDA
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗plicit 13:44, 11 November 2022 (UTC)reply
This is an essentially never linked to and rarely used by pageviews XNR using the CAT: pseudo prefix. While there are some XNRs with the CAT: pseudo-prefix that are considered to be useful due to how popular said categories are like CAT:PROD or CAT:PEND, but it seems that this is pretty specific for an XNR.
TartarTorte 13:19, 4 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete – useless and unused pseudo-namespace redirect for a content category. ■ ∃
Madeline ⇔ ∃
Part of me; 13:22, 4 November 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Apollon Zimmermann
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 13:41, 11 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Soft redirect to Russian Wikipedia. According to
WP:SRD, Soft redirects to non-English language editions of Wikipedia should be avoided because they are generally unhelpful to English-language readers. ■ ∃
Madeline ⇔ ∃
Part of me; 12:46, 4 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete: Soft-redirects to non-english wikipedias end up not being helpful. If one wants to link to a foreign language article {{
ill}} is almost always a better way to do such.
TartarTorte 13:21, 4 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom and also to encourage article creation --
Lenticel(
talk) 01:36, 5 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete, unless there is an appropriate local target for this page (which there does not appear to be). Sending readers to non-English content is not helpful. Additionally, the plain {{
soft redirect}} template is not used in the mainspace (along the lines of the sentiment expressed at
WP:SOFTSP). See
here for precedents. —
Godsy (
TALKCONT) 17:11, 7 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment: It seems like it would be pretty quick and straightforward for an editor with the requisite language skills to translate this into an English Wikipedia article.
BD2412T 21:36, 7 November 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Temp (hairstyle)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 10:40, 28 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Does it have to? It's clear how the abbreviation relates to the full title. I don't think anyone being redirected would be confused by it, so it's not necessary in this case. If you search the term off-site, all the results are about the temple fade. If you really think an explicit mention is needed, it would be easy to add one, but the "also known as" in the lead is already fairly long. –
Scyrme (
talk) 13:00, 29 October 2022 (UTC)reply
If it doesn't mention, then you can tag {{
R without mention}} but Temp (hairstyle) cannot be added to Temp (disambiguation) unless it's mentioned.
AngusW🐶🐶F (
bark •
sniff) 15:59, 4 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoristalk! 11:21, 4 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Retarget per Scyrme. Jay 💬 08:44, 11 November 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Southern Cross 9
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
It was affiliated to the
Nine Network for 5 years (2016-2021) before it switched back to a
Network 10 affiliation. That’s why A7V2.
Bassie f (
talk) 00:49, 23 October 2022 (UTC)reply
The confusion comes from what "it" is. Potentially the article should have a more "timeless" title, or the 9 affiliation part could be split out, but I think that is out of the scope of this discussion.
A7V2 (
talk) 01:08, 23 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Oppose: Southern Cross Nine and Southern Cross 9 refer to SCA's stations during their affiliation with the Nine Network. Propose they redirect to 10 (Southern Cross Austereo)#2016–2021: Nine affiliation the specific section in the article that covers the affiliation. The Adelaide station NWS was never referred to as "Southern Cross Nine" under its previous ownership, redirecting to NWS would be inaccurate and confusing. –
Nick Mitchell 98talk 05:08, 26 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 10:34, 28 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoristalk! 11:21, 4 November 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Israei beer
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗plicit 03:55, 11 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Israeli beer is the right redirect, this one is just a misspelling
Artem.G (
talk) 06:43, 28 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Well there's a request on the talk page from 2008, from the person who moved it to that title to begin with, to "fix the typo". But I guess that doesn't quite count as a
G7 since they weren't the one to move the page back. So yeah, delete. Pageviews are <10/year, probably from the search suggestions. --
Tamzincetacean needed (she|they|xe) 07:49, 28 October 2022 (UTC)reply
"Israei" is a surprisingly common typo/misspelling (type it into Google), so, per
WP:RFD#KEEP, it's better to keep it than delete it. It serves a useful function. Just needs {{
R from misspelling}} adding to it.
SilkTork (
talk) 15:14, 28 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete. The correct
Israel beer doesn't exist, and without hatnotes could create confusion with
Israel Beer. Moreover,
Israei is not a redirect for
Israel.
Mdewman6 (
talk) 02:55, 29 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 06:51, 4 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete. It is evidently difficult to ascertain what someone typing this might have wanted.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 10:50, 5 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete seems to be an unlikely misspelling --
Lenticel(
talk) 00:10, 6 November 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to
WCAT. Jay 💬 07:21, 11 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Ambiguous title — this redirect seems to exist because the first station to broadcast from the school that owns KTEQ-FM had the WCAT call sign (even though there was a 20-year gap between that station's demise and the start of the first incarnation of KTEQ). However, a
WCAT (AM) operated in Vermont until this past week, and the Massachusetts station now known as
WPVQ (AM) long had the WCAT call sign for most of its first 50 years. If I had run into this before the Vermont station shut down I might have simply boldly redirected, but it's a bit of a stickier situation now. WCQuidditch☎✎ 05:22, 4 November 2022 (UTC)reply
If there are multiple operators that use or previously used this callsign then it seems like disambiguation is in order.
Thryduulf (
talk) 12:51, 4 November 2022 (UTC)reply
There's already a disambiguation page in place at
WCAT. -
Eureka Lott 13:31, 4 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Retarget to
WCAT per Eureka Lott.
Skynxnex (
talk) 22:25, 4 November 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Mirror of Aachan
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗plicit 03:52, 11 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗plicit 03:44, 4 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete - No other possible targets of ambiguity
Roostery123 (
talk) 17:10, 4 November 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗plicit 03:51, 11 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoristalk! 03:11, 28 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 03:23, 4 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete all - Not mentioned at the target and the parenthesis leaves no room for the possibility of other uses.
Roostery123 (
talk) 17:12, 4 November 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Scrutators
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗plicit 03:51, 11 November 2022 (UTC)reply
RevertScrutator Fusshte and send that to AfD. There is a contested PROD in the page history (courtesy ping to
ThaddeusB) so that pretty much has to go for further discussion. Weak delete most of the others, as while there is extensive BLARed history to most of them the linked AfD does preclude their being notable. The exception is
Council of scrutators which has always been a redirect, whatever happens to the correctly capitalised
Council of Scrutators should happen to that one too. I'll mark it as an {{
R avoided double redirect}} without prejudice for now.
Thryduulf (
talk) 09:35, 20 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment:
Scrutator Klarm was bundled in with this nomination at this time/edit. (Pinging
Pppery to let them know.)
Steel1943 (
talk) 23:52, 20 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoristalk! 03:02, 28 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 03:21, 4 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete all No plausible redirect targets. If a book series is not notable, there's no shot that an individual character is notable. Also fine to delete
Scrutator Fusshte per
WP:NOTBURO.
Ovinus (
talk) 08:17, 9 November 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Elienor
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Somewhat reluctant delete per nom. We do have
Elienor Werner, and that name is a French variant of
Eleanor, but I'm not sure this'll be a plausible search term because 1) I don't think we have other Elienors with Wikipedia articles and 2) Werner doesn't seem to be mononymously known by her first name. Until we can find enough notable people with that name, this redirect will just have to go. Regards,
SONIC678 02:04, 28 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Retarget to
Eleanor as an attested non-fictional variant of that name. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (
投稿) 06:31, 30 October 2022 (UTC)reply
But it's not mentioned or described at that target. Perhaps this could be added to the variants section? The variant
Ellienor is mentioned at
Ellie, but is not a redirect.
Mdewman6 (
talk) 19:21, 1 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Adding it should be fine. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (
投稿) 01:20, 3 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoristalk! 02:10, 4 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Retarget to
Eleanor per
Mellohi!. I considered the disambiguation but the main page lists a bunch of variants and this would be fitting for that.
AngusW🐶🐶F (
bark •
sniff) 16:31, 4 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Retarget to
Eleanor per Mellohi! and Angus (changing my !vote, I didn't think it could be added there at first but now that I think about it it is as plausible a search term as all those others listed on the page). This variant of the name would be fitting to include on the page, and possibly mention Werner there as I've pointed out above. Regards,
SONIC678 20:04, 4 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Retarget to
Eleanor, I've added a cited mention in the article. --
Lenticel(
talk) 01:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Maritime discovery
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus / retarget to
Maritime history. Not enough consensus to justify deletion. But there is some agreement among participants to retarget this somewhere, and this was the only target that was suggested more than once.
(non-admin closure)CycloneYoristalk! 00:36, 12 November 2022 (UTC)reply
I'm not finding any evidence that the redirect exclusively refers to its target. For the most part, there have been several discoveries in the sea that are not directly related to the target subject. Unless there is evidence that the target subject is officially named as the redirect as an alternative title, the redirect probably be deleted to allow search results to be more helpful than this pigeonholing connection.
Steel1943 (
talk) 20:51, 20 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete The Polynesians certainly performed maritime discovery, as did the vikings --
65.92.244.114 (
talk) 10:49, 25 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoristalk! 23:21, 27 October 2022 (UTC)reply
comment (redirect) If this was the Portuguese (and Portugal's) wikipedia this might be a decent redirect. Alas... it isn't... So it probably is best redirected to
Maritime_history#Age_of_Discovery or
Maritime_history. -
Nabla (
talk) 23:02, 29 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 01:44, 4 November 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.
✗plicit 03:49, 11 November 2022 (UTC)reply
This is the name of an active YouTuber with 547 thousand subscribers. He did a series on the 2018 Pittsburgh Steelers season, but he's also done a LOT more. This is not an appropriate redirect and should be left red for the time being.
Hey man im josh (
talk) 00:04, 4 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete while he is mentioned in the target article he has done a lot more on YouTube than simply cover the 2018 Steelers season so there is a strong chance that people looking him up are doing for different reasons making this redirect useless in many instances.--
65.92.162.81 (
talk) 04:05, 4 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete as his regular name doesn't even have a redirect and it's probably
WP:BLP1E for now.
AngusW🐶🐶F (
bark •
sniff) 16:39, 4 November 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete Because he uploads videos on other sports-related content then just the 2018 Steelers. —
216.7.132.76 (
talk) 18:36, 5 November 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.