The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Wrong forum. Discussion moved to Talk:Turner (disambiguation)#Requested move. ( non-admin closure) Steel1943 ( talk) 20:53, 8 October 2014 (UTC) reply

• Turner → J. M. W. Turner ( links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ delete ] 

Turner should redirect to Turner (disambiguation). While I agree that J. M. W. Turner is one of the most notable artists of history, this situation differs from cases like Picasso or Beethoven. Turner is an incredibly common name, belonging to notable figures such as Prime Ministers, award winning actors, and one of the most well-known media moguls, among hundreds of others. Additionally, google search, news, and book results to not indicate that the artist dominates in the use of the last name. Yaksar (let's chat) 20:41, 8 October 2014 (UTC) reply

• Wrong forum. This is actually a request to move Turner (disambiguation) to Turner, establishing that there is no primary topic. I may move this discussion to Talk:Turner (disambiguation) shortly as a WP:RM request. Steel1943 ( talk) 20:47, 8 October 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. [Non-admin close.] Oiyarbepsy ( talk) 04:02, 15 December 2014 (UTC) reply

• Ass cancer → Anal cancer ( links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ delete ] 

Not a proper name for a redirect. Noone is going to be looking for anal cancer by searching for ass cancer. -- CFCF 🍌 ( email) 19:38, 8 October 2014 (UTC) reply

• Keep per WP:NOTCENSORED, and the fact that the two terms "ass" and "anal" are synonymous. Deleting this redirect harms those who may not know one word or the other. Steel1943 ( talk) 19:44, 8 October 2014 (UTC) reply
• Delete (despite my nostalgia for the creator of this redirect). "Ass" is not synonymous with "anus", and it is doubtful that anyone would seriously use "ass cancer" as a search term, even though it may provide some entertainment for sniggering schoolboys. The NotCensored shibboleth has no bearing here. Kablammo ( talk) 20:23, 8 October 2014 (UTC) reply

• I could only partially agree with that rationale if the article " Donkey cancer" existed, and it doesn't. Also, I don't understand why "schoolboys" getting a laugh out of the redirect has any impact on whether or not it should be deleted; we don't censor a term just because it may get some laughs ... so WP:NOTCENSORED really does apply. In fact, stating that "schoolboys" may look this this term up proves that it is useful redirect, and thus meets WP:RFD#KEEP reason 5. Steel1943 ( talk) 20:29, 8 October 2014 (UTC) reply

So we should add new redirects, such as Asshole cancer and Bunghole cancer, and Boob cancer (and perhaps dozens of others) for breast cancer? The Fat Man Who Never Came Back made a career of lampooning the insular ways and occasional sophistries of wikipedians. Years after he created this redirect, Wikipedia finally bit. TFM would be pleased with the commotion his redirect has caused. Kablammo ( talk) 13:20, 9 October 2014 (UTC) reply

• To provide some clarity on my stance, I, more or less, agree with Thryduulf's statement below. Steel1943 ( talk) 13:23, 9 October 2014 (UTC) reply

• Comment a much bigger problem than the possible offensiveness of the slang term "ass" is its imprecision: "ass cancer" might just as well be colorectal cancer, soft-tissue sarcoma around the buttocks, equine cancers (though as mentioned, Wikipedia has no coverage of those right now), or something else I haven't thought of

Anyway, for a medical topic it would be far better to avoid making assumptions about what exactly the reader is trying to find. I don't know whether this should seriously be a disambiguation page, or whether we should delete it (effectively telling searchers that they need to use more precise terminology). 61.10.165.33 ( talk) 02:23, 9 October 2014 (UTC) reply

• Disambiguate. Although this is often used in a juvenile way, it isn't only used in that manner. It's not an easy term to search for (I've been using "ass cancer" -wikipedia -"kick ass" -"dumb ass" -"fat ass" -"bad ass" (which will be removing some results I do want as well as those I don't). My findings are that it is used almost equally to mean colorectal cancer and anal cancer and also occasionally cancer in the buttocks (which can be one of at least two different types of cancer). Thryduulf ( talk) 10:00, 9 October 2014 (UTC) reply
• Keep why do you say no one would look for this? Seems a perfectly reasonable way to look for the topic, per Steel. -- 65.94.171.225 ( talk) 05:33, 10 October 2014 (UTC) reply
• Keep per Steel. My main concern with Thryduulf's proposal is that it would seem to promote the phrase. I don't really want to see "Ass cancer can refer to" on a page, not when there's already a logical target in Anal cancer. -- BDD ( talk) 14:29, 31 October 2014 (UTC) reply
  • @ BDD: why would this be promoting the phrase? This is not an issue with any other dab page I know of, and you're apparent dislike of the phrase is not relevant to anything. The dab page could legitimately start something like "Ass cancer" is an informal, sometimes juvenile, term that can refer to... if you feel the need to be more verbose than we normally are. The problem with pointing it at Anal cancer is that that is not the primary usage of the term - colorectal cancer is equally likely to be what people using this are looking for, and there are also other types of cancer that although less likely are plausible enough that they should appear on the dab page. Thryduulf ( talk) 23:58, 14 December 2014 (UTC) reply

It would promote the term inasmuch as when someone Googles "ass cancer", they're likely to get a dab of that name as one of the top results, rather than the encyclopedic target article. (The RfD has been around long enough that the template text now shows in a search.) Calling the term juvenile in mainspace is POV. And at a glance through Google results, at least, the term does more likely refer to anal cancer. -- BDD ( talk) 00:52, 15 December 2014 (UTC) reply

That is no more relevant than any other case where someone googles a topic that has the disambiguation page primary. I haven't done the research again, so I'm a little fuzzy on the detail, but my recommendation is based on my findings when removing as much of the irrelevant results as I could. Thryduulf ( talk) 00:59, 15 December 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ThaddeusB ( talk) 02:28, 13 December 2014 (UTC) reply

• Kana:wa → Canoe ( links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ delete ] 

What does this mean. I am getting Google search results about unrelated islands in Indonesia among other stuff. - The ChampionMan 1234 23:55, 2 September 2014 (UTC) reply

It probably means ‘canoe’, but in what language I don’t know. A Carib dictionary spells it ⟨kanawa⟩. A Paumarí lexicon spells it ⟨kānāʹwā⟩. Many online dictionaries, which all share a single source, spell it ⟨kana:wa⟩ and claim it is Carib. Gorobay ( talk) 21:34, 3 September 2014 (UTC) reply

• Comment This carries the language code "und" which is for "undetermined" -- 65.94.169.222 ( talk) 04:35, 4 September 2014 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Thryduulf ( talk) 12:53, 8 October 2014 (UTC) reply

• My IPA is rusty, if that's even what this is, but is this a rendition of Kanawha? If so, retargeting to that dab might work. According to Kanawha River, the name does derive from "Iroquoian dialects meaning 'water way' or 'canoe way'". It would seem quite a coincidence if the Carib word for "canoe" were so similar to an Iroquoian one, though stranger things have happened. Carib seems to have the stronger claim here, though if this is just one indigenous word for canoe, it should probably be deleted. -- BDD ( talk) 14:16, 8 October 2014 (UTC) reply
• Delete If we can't figure out what this means, I'm not sure readers will either, let alone use it as a search term. -- BDD ( talk) 14:27, 31 October 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy retarget to St. Andrew's Church with the agreement of the nominator and no contrary views. NAC. The Whispering Wind ( talk) 14:58, 9 October 2014 (UTC) reply

• St. Andrew Parish Church → Parañaque Cathedral ( links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ delete ] 

I would like to delete the redirect to create future disambugation page for churches named after St. Andrew. Following WP:Commonname, the article Paranaque Cathedral does not need any redirect. Carlojoseph14 ( talk) 12:51, 8 October 2014 (UTC) reply

• retarget to the existing disambiguation page at St. Andrew's Church. Even if one didn't exist, you don't need to delete a redirect to replace it with a disambiguation page - you can just overwrite it. Thryduulf ( talk) 12:54, 8 October 2014 (UTC) reply

• Sorry, I did not see that there is an existing disambugation page. I agree with a retarget. -- Carlojoseph14 ( talk) 13:06, 8 October 2014 (UTC) reply

• Retarget to St. Andrew's Church per Thryduulf. -- Lenticel ^{( talk)} 01:31, 9 October 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 14:26, 31 October 2014 (UTC) reply

• XHMMA-TV → Gala TV (Mexico) ( links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ delete ] 

Misspelling of XHHMA-TV. See also XHSS-TV, RfD'd August 15. Raymie ( t • c) 23:26, 30 August 2014 (UTC) reply

• Comment XHHMA-TV also points to Gala TV (Mexico), so they both point to the same article. -- 65.94.169.222 ( talk) 06:07, 31 August 2014 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Thryduulf ( talk) 12:21, 8 October 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 15:44, 29 November 2014 (UTC) reply

• Kankoku → South Korea ( links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ delete ] 

No affinity for Romanised Japanese - The ChampionMan 1234 07:22, 30 August 2014 (UTC) reply

• Commment Japan ruled Korea 1910-1945, so if this is kept, it should be retargetted to Korea under Japanese rule; however, Korea under Japanese rule appears to have been Chousen (朝鮮) not Kan (韓); so was "韓" also used to refer to Korea during the Japanese administration period? -- 65.94.169.222 ( talk) 06:17, 31 August 2014 (UTC) reply
• Comment For one, the Japan–Korea Treaty of 1910 ( ja:韓国併合ニ関スル条約) uses "Kankoku", including in the photo. 野狼院ひさし _{Hisashi Yarouin} 15:10, 31 August 2014 (UTC) reply

Comment According to jawiki (yes, yes, WP:CIRCULAR, but the paragraph cites sources) Japanese stopped using the name Kankoku during the colonial period:

韓国併合によって大韓帝国が消滅すると、日本は韓国の地名を朝鮮に戻し、朝鮮に本籍地を有する日本臣民となった者が法律上、「朝鮮人」と称されることになった。

Due to the annexation of Kankoku, the Korean Empire disappeared and Japan went back to using the name Chosen for Kankoku, and people domiciled in Chosen who became Japanese subjects were called "Chosen people" under the law.

Probably it's because Kankoku contained the character koku (country). Anyway, it's yet another reason why redirecting Kankoku to Korea under Japanese rule makes about as much sense as redirecting Repiblik dominikèn to Unification of Hispaniola. 61.10.165.33 ( talk) 03:38, 2 September 2014 (UTC) reply

• Do not retarget Better to delete than have a misleading redirect. Native Japanese would not expect to end up at Korea under Japanese rule when they type this in. And an English speaker who is trying to use Wikipedia as a dictionary would be grossly misled by that redirect. This word does not mean "Korea under Japanese rule", it just means "Korea". 61.10.165.33 ( talk) 03:32, 1 September 2014 (UTC) reply
  • It will need to be retargetted if we keep this. Native Japanese have Japanese Wikipedia, so it only matters if the Japanese term has any affinity for a particular topic in English, not as what a Japanese speaker would now use it for. The topic with affinity for Japanese is the period that Japan ruled Korea. -- 65.94.169.222 ( talk) 04:05, 1 September 2014 (UTC) reply
    • "It will need to be retargetted if we keep this" ... well then the obvious solution is, delete it. Wikipedia should not be making misleading foreign-language redirects on the basis of vague "affinity" when the actual meaning of the foreign-language word is not the proposed target. The fact that "Native Japanese have Japanese Wikipedia" does not matter; the redirect you propose is misleading to English-speaking readers who do not know what "Kankoku" means and will mistakenly assume it is a valid synonym for "Korea under Japanese rule". No speakers of English or any other language use the word "Kankoku" that way, they bloody well shouldn't, and mercifully they are highly unlikely to do so in the future ... unless Wikipedia insists on creating a misleading redirect and it stupidly gets slurped up into every search engine and web-scraping dictionary in the world. 61.10.165.33 ( talk) 04:45, 1 September 2014 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Relisting comment: I read the above arguments as having approximately equal weight for retargetting and for deleting. Obviously we cannot do both, so more input would be helpful

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Thryduulf ( talk) 12:16, 8 October 2014 (UTC) reply

• Delete - I agree with the editor above that the proposed retargeting would imply a misleading meaning of the term.-- Yaksar (let's chat) 20:47, 8 October 2014 (UTC) reply
• Keep - appears to direct readers to the content they're looking for. A more specific target would probably not do that. Wily D 11:15, 22 October 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete, keep, and keep, respectively. -- BDD ( talk) 14:19, 31 October 2014 (UTC) reply

• Uladzimir Pucin → Vladimir Putin ( links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ delete ] 
• Wladimir Puttin → Vladimir Putin ( links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ delete ] 
• Wladimir Putin → Vladimir Putin ( links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ delete ] 

Invented spelling. - The ChampionMan 1234 04:48, 28 August 2014 (UTC) reply

• Keep "Wladimir Putin" {{ R from typo}} -- 65.94.169.222 ( talk) 07:28, 28 August 2014 (UTC) reply
• Keep last two. These seem like sufficiently plausible redirects. Wladimir is the German translation of Vladimir. I know that it is not standard to have such translations, but we are talking about a prominent head of state here. - Hoops gza ( talk) 15:02, 2 September 2014 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Relisting comment: This is a procedural relisting as TheChampionMan1234 tagged only the first of these reidrects

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Thryduulf ( talk) 12:08, 8 October 2014 (UTC) reply

• Keep Putin - Wladimir is a common spelling. Puttin, is a plausible typo, so I'd keep that. Can't find "pucin" used anywhere, it can go. Wily D 11:19, 22 October 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete the first twelve, keep the last seven. -- BDD ( talk) 15:51, 29 November 2014 (UTC) reply

• 홀로코스트 → The Holocaust ( links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ delete ] 
• হলোকস্ট → The Holocaust ( links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ delete ] 
• ഹോളോകോസ്റ്റ് → The Holocaust ( links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ delete ] 
• பெரும் இன அழிப்பு → The Holocaust ( links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ delete ] 
• होलोकॉस्ट → The Holocaust ( links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ delete ] 
• यहूदी नरसंहार → The Holocaust ( links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ delete ] 
• ہولو کاسٹ → The Holocaust ( links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ delete ] 
• ھۆلۆکۆست → The Holocaust ( links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ delete ] 
• هولوکاست → The Holocaust ( links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ delete ] 
• هولوكوست → The Holocaust ( links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ delete ] 
• مرگ انبوہ → The Holocaust ( links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ delete ] 
• Հոլոքոստ → The Holocaust ( links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ delete ] 
• Холокост → The Holocaust ( links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ delete ] 
• Холокауст → The Holocaust ( links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ delete ] 
• Халакост → The Holocaust ( links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ delete ] 
• Масавае знішчэнне яўрэйскага насельніцтва, 1933-1945 → The Holocaust ( links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ delete ] 
• Голокост → The Holocaust ( links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ delete ] 
• Голокауст → The Holocaust ( links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ delete ] 
• Галакост → The Holocaust ( links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ delete ] 

Not related to any of these languages. - The ChampionMan 1234 03:40, 28 August 2014 (UTC) reply

• Keep the last 7 The Holocaust is certainly related to Russian, Belorussian and Ukrainian. - Hoops gza ( talk) 04:24, 28 August 2014 (UTC) reply
  • It's also related to Serbia, Macedonia and Rusyn. In other words, the bottom seven should be kept. - Hoops gza ( talk) 04:27, 28 August 2014 (UTC) reply
• Keep the last 7, per Hoops gza.  —  SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼  05:07, 28 August 2014 (UTC) reply
• @ Hoops gza:, Well, I think retargeting some of these to the articles you mentioned above would be better than keeping them as is. - The ChampionMan 1234 05:28, 28 August 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Huh? They're the name of the Holocaust in those languages. We don't redirect random words in non-English langauges to our articles on those languages.  —  SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼  06:06, 28 August 2014 (UTC) reply
• Delete definitely for the Korean one. For the rest, I guess TCM means to retarget the one in Russian to The Holocaust in Russia, the one in Ukrainian to The Holocaust in Ukraine and so on? Sounds logical but staying neutral for being largely uninitiated in the topic. 野狼院ひさし _{Hisashi Yarouin} 07:25, 29 August 2014 (UTC) reply
• Delete all The Holocaust is not specific to any one country, but instead ravaged all of Europe, and several areas outside Europe. Only German and Jewish languages should have such redirects. Oiyarbepsy ( talk) 02:44, 2 September 2014 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Relisting comment: This is a procedural relisting as TheChampionMan1234 did not tag any but the first redirect.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Thryduulf ( talk) 11:59, 8 October 2014 (UTC) reply

Comment@ Thryduulf: Funnily enough, I didn't get the notification even though you linked to my user page, hope you will get it, though. - The ChampionMan 1234 03:41, 9 October 2014 (UTC) reply

I did. I wonder if my doing inside a (subst-ed) template had anything to do with it? Thryduulf ( talk) 09:38, 9 October 2014 (UTC) reply

• Keep - directs readers to the target they're looking for, no argument has been presented for deletion. Wily D 12:09, 22 October 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 14:17, 31 October 2014 (UTC) reply

• Aakri → Acre ( links to redirect • history • stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ delete ] 

Topic which isn't language-specific. - The ChampionMan 1234 06:30, 8 October 2014 (UTC) reply

• Delete users who type in this string of letters could be looking one of for the various Indian movie characters by this name, or they might have misspelled something else entirely, so the best thing Wikipedia can do for them is to give them a search results page. 61.10.165.33 ( talk) 07:50, 8 October 2014 (UTC) reply
• Delete. fr.wp has an article about fr:Mustapha El Aakri, a Moroccan singer. If we had an article on him then I would be proposing this be retargetted to it. However we don't, and my French isn't up to translating what they have. Thryduulf ( talk) 10:30, 8 October 2014 (UTC) reply
• delete for now since we don't have a valid target. I've been getting possibly notable movies and people in my Google search. However, we don't have articles on them yet and the sources aren't in English. - Lenticel ^{( talk)} 01:42, 9 October 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.