Copyrighted image replacable by multitude of images from
[1] or
[2]Fasach Nua (
talk) 15:48, 6 January 2008 (UTC)reply
Delete- This is only on
Doctor Who - it is not actually included on the other pages - and is replaceable there by another image of the TARDIS. The
TARDIS page contains enough images without this.
StuartDDcontributions 15:59, 7 January 2008 (UTC)reply
Delete, replaceable. Will(
talk) 17:10, 7 January 2008 (UTC)reply
Note - this has in fact been replaced, so is there fore not used.
StuartDDcontributions 10:44, 8 January 2008 (UTC)reply
Looking at her previous history of edits it would appear that this is not in fact an image of her but of someone she knows and is trying to disparage. Same as
Image:Butters.jpg. --
Roleplayer (
talk) 21:17, 6 January 2008 (UTC)reply
User was blocked, has uploaded similar images before. Deleted as having no usefulness.--
NrDg 21:50, 6 January 2008 (UTC)reply
Copyright violations. The museum probably did not release these exhibits into the public domain, though they may have given permission to make photograph copies of them. —
Remember the dot(
talk) 06:43, 6 January 2008 (UTC)reply
Blatant copyright vilotation - reproduction copyrighted 2D images speedy deleteFasach Nua (
talk) 11:07, 6 January 2008 (UTC)reply
Unnecessary fair use. This icon adds nothing to the reader's understanding of the
ZIP (file format) article. It isn't even the most common ZIP icon (the WinZip icon, and the Windows XP compressed folder icon, are both far more ubiquitous than this). It fails
non-free content criterion #8, which requires that the image "significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding." That is not the case here; the image is just decoration and the article would be fine without it. Uploader has been absent since September.
*** Crotalus *** 11:31, 6 January 2008 (UTC)reply
Orphaned, not enough info to determine encyclopedic use (and looks likely Unencyclopedic anyways)
Calliopejen1 (
talk) 20:42, 6 January 2008 (UTC)reply
there are 17 non-free artwork examples (all labeled PD) on this artist/filmmaker's page. i'm nominating all but one (which i thought seemed pretty and representative as a totally uneducated observer) for deletion. feel free to argue that maybe one or two others are better to keep but we certainly don't need 17.
Calliopejen1 (
talk) 21:02, 6 January 2008 (UTC)reply
there are 17 non-free artwork examples (all labeled PD) on this artist/filmmaker's page. i'm nominating all but one (which i thought seemed pretty and representative as a totally uneducated observer) for deletion. feel free to argue that maybe one or two others are better to keep but we certainly don't need 17.
Calliopejen1 (
talk) 21:02, 6 January 2008 (UTC)reply
there are 17 non-free artwork examples (all labeled PD) on this artist/filmmaker's page. i'm nominating all but one (which i thought seemed pretty and representative as a totally uneducated observer) for deletion. feel free to argue that maybe one or two others are better to keep but we certainly don't need 17.
Calliopejen1 (
talk) 21:03, 6 January 2008 (UTC)reply
there are 17 non-free artwork examples (all labeled PD) on this artist/filmmaker's page. i'm nominating all but one (which i thought seemed pretty and representative as a totally uneducated observer) for deletion. feel free to argue that maybe one or two others are better to keep but we certainly don't need 17.
Calliopejen1 (
talk) 21:03, 6 January 2008 (UTC)reply
there are 17 non-free artwork examples (all labeled PD) on this artist/filmmaker's page. i'm nominating all but one (which i thought seemed pretty and representative as a totally uneducated observer) for deletion. feel free to argue that maybe one or two others are better to keep but we certainly don't need 17.
Calliopejen1 (
talk) 21:03, 6 January 2008 (UTC)reply
there are 17 non-free artwork examples (all labeled PD) on this artist/filmmaker's page. i'm nominating all but one (which i thought seemed pretty and representative as a totally uneducated observer) for deletion. feel free to argue that maybe one or two others are better to keep but we certainly don't need 17.
Calliopejen1 (
talk) 21:03, 6 January 2008 (UTC)reply
there are 17 non-free artwork examples (all labeled PD) on this artist/filmmaker's page. i'm nominating all but one (which i thought seemed pretty and representative as a totally uneducated observer) for deletion. feel free to argue that maybe one or two others are better to keep but we certainly don't need 17.
Calliopejen1 (
talk) 21:04, 6 January 2008 (UTC)reply
there are 17 non-free artwork examples (all labeled PD) on this artist/filmmaker's page. i'm nominating all but one (which i thought seemed pretty and representative as a totally uneducated observer) for deletion. feel free to argue that maybe one or two others are better to keep but we certainly don't need 17.
Calliopejen1 (
talk) 21:04, 6 January 2008 (UTC)reply
there are 17 non-free artwork examples (all labeled PD) on this artist/filmmaker's page. i'm nominating all but one (which i thought seemed pretty and representative as a totally uneducated observer) for deletion. feel free to argue that maybe one or two others are better to keep but we certainly don't need 17.
Calliopejen1 (
talk) 21:04, 6 January 2008 (UTC)reply
there are 17 non-free artwork examples (all labeled PD) on this artist/filmmaker's page. i'm nominating all but one (which i thought seemed pretty and representative as a totally uneducated observer) for deletion. feel free to argue that maybe one or two others are better to keep but we certainly don't need 17.
Calliopejen1 (
talk) 21:05, 6 January 2008 (UTC)reply
there are 17 non-free artwork examples (all labeled PD) on this artist/filmmaker's page. i'm nominating all but one (which i thought seemed pretty and representative as a totally uneducated observer) for deletion. feel free to argue that maybe one or two others are better to keep but we certainly don't need 17.
Calliopejen1 (
talk) 21:05, 6 January 2008 (UTC)reply
there are 17 non-free artwork examples (all labeled PD) on this artist/filmmaker's page. i'm nominating all but one (which i thought seemed pretty and representative as a totally uneducated observer) for deletion. feel free to argue that maybe one or two others are better to keep but we certainly don't need 17.
Calliopejen1 (
talk) 21:05, 6 January 2008 (UTC)reply
there are 17 non-free artwork examples (all labeled PD) on this artist/filmmaker's page. i'm nominating all but one (which i thought seemed pretty and representative as a totally uneducated observer) for deletion. feel free to argue that maybe one or two others are better to keep but we certainly don't need 17.
Calliopejen1 (
talk) 21:05, 6 January 2008 (UTC)reply
there are 17 non-free artwork examples (all labeled PD) on this artist/filmmaker's page. i'm nominating all but one (which i thought seemed pretty and representative as a totally uneducated observer) for deletion. feel free to argue that maybe one or two others are better to keep but we certainly don't need 17.
Calliopejen1 (
talk) 21:06, 6 January 2008 (UTC)reply
there are 17 non-free artwork examples (all labeled PD) on this artist/filmmaker's page. i'm nominating all but one (which i thought seemed pretty and representative as a totally uneducated observer) for deletion. feel free to argue that maybe one or two others are better to keep but we certainly don't need 17.
Calliopejen1 (
talk) 21:06, 6 January 2008 (UTC)reply
there are 17 non-free artwork examples (all labeled PD) on this artist/filmmaker's page. i'm nominating all but one (which i thought seemed pretty and representative as a totally uneducated observer) for deletion. feel free to argue that maybe one or two others are better to keep but we certainly don't need 17.
Calliopejen1 (
talk) 21:06, 6 January 2008 (UTC)reply
derivative work of likely copyrighted sculpture (unless someone has evidence that this sculpture is PD)
Calliopejen1 (
talk) 21:23, 6 January 2008 (UTC)reply
recent artwork labeled PD but almost certainly isn't; presumably we could find a PD image of this bodhisattva
Calliopejen1 (
talk) 21:30, 6 January 2008 (UTC)reply
OR, UE, probably CV as uploader probably is not subject as claimed
Ashdog137 (
talk) 21:38, 6 January 2008 (UTC)reply
Blocked user was uploading self images to add to articles. Deleted as nonsense. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
NrDg (
talk •
contribs) 21:48, 6 January 2008 (UTC)reply