The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the
current Help Desk pages.
April 9 Information
Page Curation: 15k to 29 THOUSAND pages
I changed my NPP settings to Unreviwed Mainspace Redirects, and the number in the upper right corner now says 29K pages needing reviewing. Is this because of the changes, or were page creators really busy this week and doubled the number of unreviewed pages?
L3X1(distant write) 02:03, 9 April 2017 (UTC)reply
Hi
L3X1, hope you're doing well. My guess is that the increase is purely because of your changing the NPP settings and including redirects. Thanks.
Lourdes 03:27, 9 April 2017 (UTC)reply
Ref number 14 is not done correctly. Publication should be in italics maybe??? Please leave in quote. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
101.182.51.93 (
talk) 07:03, 9 April 2017 (UTC)reply
When you read
Template:Cite web and compare it with reference 14 (which you added), it will tell you that the parameter "website" will be italicised, whereas the parameter "publisher" which you have (as usual) misused by cluttering it up with data that doesn't belong there, does not get italicised. The solution is in your own hands. --
David Biddulph (
talk) 07:35, 9 April 2017 (UTC)reply
(ec) That rather trivial and not particularly controversial fact was over-sourced (six), so I've deleted three of them, including number 14.
Clarityfiend (
talk) 07:37, 9 April 2017 (UTC)reply
I agree - It is a trivial piece of information- Ellen Degeneras - that is why I added the ONE piece that had the information in it. As it stands, the article does NOT have any references to Ellen. Please place back the reference that I added from FOX news. Thanks
101.182.51.93 (
talk) 08:00, 9 April 2017 (UTC)reply
I have failed to correctly add a 3rd book to the "Further reading" section at the very end of this page. Please leave in the quote. Thankyou
101.182.51.93 (
talk) 07:55, 9 April 2017 (UTC)reply
Fixed As previously explained to you only a few days ago, you do not place the book details within ref tags in this situation.
Eagleash (
talk) 08:13, 9 April 2017 (UTC)reply
In the "Grandparents" section - can you please do a direct link to Kate Lupton (Baroness von Schunck) - who has her own little section on the
Lupton family page. Thanks as always
101.182.51.93 (
talk) 08:28, 9 April 2017 (UTC)reply
Done
The way to do this is to use a wikilink in the form [[target article#target section|link text]]. So [[Lupton family#Kate Lupton (Baroness von Schunck)|Kate Lupton]] gives:
Kate Lupton.
Caeciliusinhorto (
talk) 10:15, 9 April 2017 (UTC)reply
This weird thing keeps happening. One moment my account is blocked indefinitely by Daphne Lantier and my IP address is autoblocked; the next, I'm back to when I first made my account. Please give me an explanation. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Will this username please work? (
talk •
contribs) 23:19, 9 April 2017 (UTC)reply
Thanks for clarifying that,
PrimeHunter. I wonder if
Will this username please work? got confused between the two separate user and user talk pages (on enwiki and on commons) and thought one of them had been deleted or altered? Either way, "Will" (for short), what you posted at the Commons Help desk was combative and accusatory, and I see why people might have got annoyed with you. --
ColinFine (
talk) 12:48, 10 April 2017 (UTC)reply
Do you wish to move it to draftspace so you can continue working on it, or do you feel that it is ready for mainspace?
Eagleash (
talk) 23:36, 9 April 2017 (UTC)reply
@
PrimeHunter: I have taken the liberty of tweaking the AfC t/plate as it contained your username and you would have got any notifications of acceptance or rejection.
Eagleash (
talk) 00:07, 10 April 2017 (UTC)reply