From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

South Park (season 13)

| discuss
South Park (season 13)
15 articles
" The Ring"
" The Coon"
" Margaritaville"
" Eat, Pray, Queef"
" Fishsticks"
" Pinewood Derby"
" Fatbeard"
" Dead Celebrities"
" Butters' Bottom Bitch"
" W.T.F."
" Whale Whores"
" The F Word"
" Dances with Smurfs"
" Pee"

This is a good topic nomination. I've been working on this for some time in conjunction with the South Park Featured Topic Drive, and since all the articles are now GA status, I believe it's ready for GT. Nergaal and other WikiProject South Park users have helped out along the way. Thanks! — Hun ter Ka hn 04:19, 19 March 2010 (UTC) reply

German Type UB I submarines

| discuss
German Type UB I submarine
22 articles
SM UB-2
SM UB-3
SM UB-4
SM UB-5
SM UB-6
SM UB-7
SM UB-8
SM UB-9
SM UB-10
SM UB-11
SM UB-12
SM UB-13
SM UB-14
SM UB-16
SM UB-17
Austro-Hungarian U-10 class
SM U-10 (ex-UB-1)
SM U-11 (ex-UB-15)
SM U-15
SM U-16
SM U-17
Main contribuitor: Bellhalla

He has suddenly stopped editing two months ago and I have left a notification on his talkpage about a month ago. This might be one of the last contributions that Bellhalla has given to Wikipedia. Nergaal ( talk) 01:29, 18 February 2010 (UTC) reply

Note: I believe the subtopic should be separated because it has 5+1 article by itself and because I plan on nominating a super-topic on Austro-Hungarian classes or submarine list which would need the U-10 class as a subtopic by itself. Nergaal ( talk) 01:29, 18 February 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Oppose - I disagree as I do not think the topics are big enough to merit splitting. I definitely think that SM U-10 (Austria-Hungary) (the only one of the 5 not a GA but at GAN) and SM U-11 (Austria-Hungary), in particular, should be part of this topic, as they were originally used by the German navy, and were only later sold to Austria-Hungary (while the other three boats in the U-10 class were built for and used from the start by Austria-Hungary). Also I don't think your plans to nominate a supertopic are relevant as the U-10 class article can appear in such a supertopic whether it has its own topic or not. While it would make for nice visual structures, I don't see why this supertopic would need the U-10 class to appear as a subtopic at all. More than that, the subtopic link could actually point back to this topic - rst20xx ( talk) 13:31, 19 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Ok, so you are suggesting to remove the class article and add 10 & 11, then in the supertopic put the class article but link here for the subtopic? Or you want the class and the five other articles here? Nergaal ( talk) 07:13, 20 February 2010 (UTC) reply
I think the second option would be better, and after all, 10 is the only one of the 6 articles that isn't a GA already - rst20xx ( talk) 13:11, 20 February 2010 (UTC) reply
What should happen to the image in that case, as some of the boats did not run under the German flag. Nergaal ( talk) 20:13, 20 February 2010 (UTC) reply
As the Germans made all the boats, I don't see a problem with still using this flag, or maybe the German national flag - rst20xx ( talk) 14:46, 21 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Comment. I've gotten SM U-11 to GA status and the GA for SM U-10 was a quick pass. All articles are at GA status now.-- Coldplay Expért Let's talk 21:44, 4 March 2010 (UTC) reply
Yes to all, Nergal promoted SM U-10 and I promoted SM U-11. However credit goes to Bellhalla for the whole thing. But all articles are now at GA.-- Coldplay Expért Let's talk 21:55, 5 March 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Comment - so, uh, it seems most people would favour adding the articles (well, 2 out of 3). I've added them above and struck my oppose. I would support the 22-article layout above. Feedback from others would be appreciated - rst20xx ( talk) 23:49, 10 March 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Support, but should the U-10 class be a subtopic? — Ed  (talk • majestic titan) 21:13, 13 March 2010 (UTC) reply
    Well, that's what all the discussion before your vote was about... rst20xx ( talk) 16:06, 15 March 2010 (UTC) reply
    ...and I continue to demonstrate my lack of reading skills. ;) Thanks Rst. — Ed  (talk • majestic titan) 16:13, 15 March 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Close with consensus to promote - rst20xx ( talk) 17:55, 15 March 2010 (UTC) reply

Saratoga campaign

| discuss
Saratoga campaign
9 articles
Siege of Fort Ticonderoga
Battle of Hubbardton
Battle of Fort Anne
Siege of Fort Stanwix
Battle of Oriskany
Battle of Bennington
Battle of Forts Clinton and Montgomery
Battles of Saratoga

This topic is based on the contents of {{ Campaignbox American Revolutionary War: Saratoga campaign}}, which are unified by the article on the Saratoga campaign. Magic ♪piano 15:38, 20 February 2010 (UTC) reply

  • Comment - book please - rst20xx ( talk) 16:25, 20 February 2010 (UTC) reply
    • It just took me a bit to figure out how to do it (I didn't find the book tool helpful). Magic ♪piano 19:43, 20 February 2010 (UTC) reply
      • Support - I would have thought you'd have just copied another book! Anyway I removed the piping out of battle/siege etc above as better to let people see which it was. Also colons not bullet points. Support - rst20xx ( talk) 14:41, 21 February 2010 (UTC) reply
      • Support - I think these articles have much for info than they did a few months ago. Bernstein2291 ( Talk • Contributions • Sign Here) 08:48, 3 March 2010 (UTC) reply
      • Support - Everything checks out. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 18:51, 3 March 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Support - MBK 004 20:37, 5 March 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Close with consensus to promote - sorry about the delay - rst20xx ( talk) 16:04, 6 March 2010 (UTC) reply

Quietly Confident Quartet

| discuss
Quietly Confident Quartet
6 articles
Mark Kerry
Peter Evans
Mark Tonelli
Neil Brooks
Men's 4 x 100 metre medley relay at the 1980 Summer Olympics
Main contribuitor: YellowMonkey

Last time one article was missing. Nergaal ( talk) 19:07, 10 February 2010 (UTC) reply

No votes (even opposing) in a whole week? Nergaal ( talk) 00:07, 18 February 2010 (UTC) reply
Well I can't vote; I'll give the main race another run-through YellowMonkey ( vote in the Southern Stars photo poll) 01:46, 18 February 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Support - everything seems covered -- ChrisTheDude ( talk) 08:46, 18 February 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Support - this is comprehensive, now the race's article is included. Nice work - rst20xx ( talk) 13:14, 19 February 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Support — Terrence and Phillip 09:58, 20 February 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Comment - book please - rst20xx ( talk) 16:24, 20 February 2010 (UTC) reply
    • check Nergaal ( talk) 20:18, 20 February 2010 (UTC) reply
      • I fixed the formatting, which has to follow strict rules for books - rst20xx ( talk) 14:38, 21 February 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Close with consensus to promote - rst20xx ( talk) 17:59, 5 March 2010 (UTC) reply
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Featured_and_good_topic_candidates/Good_log/March_2010&oldid=1000210102"