Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Mar 2012 at 21:14:19 (UTC)
Reason
This picture was nominated for a featured picture
before, but I feel it deserves a second chance due to it's usefulness in the articles in which it is displayed.
Support as nominator --
Haljackey (
talk) 21:14, 3 March 2012 (UTC)reply
Oppose Due to limited EV for the articles listed. Were it not for the articles mentioned here I wouldn't know that this were Toronto or Highway 401. I wouldn't know that it's controlled-access either, except I saw
the other (now withdrawn) nomination. In
lighting it's being used to highlight the high-mast street lamps (which happen to be the smallest-sized lighted parts in the photo), rather than the more obvious lights from the vehicles or buildings. Nor it doesn't really show how well they light the road in
street light because of all the other light from the cars and buildings, although I suppose there's not really a time when this road is quiet enough for that. EV for
Long-exposure photography is good, but it's not exceptional and there are others that are equally as good or better at
Commons:Category:Automobile light trails. Matthewedwards :
Chat 04:44, 4 March 2012 (UTC)reply