Wikipedia:ACCESS#Resolution, while I agree that conforming to something used by less than a percentage of a our readers, when doing so is detrimental at times to the other 99% is ludicrous, we are required to make things compatible with 800x600. Wikipedia:WikiProject_Usability/Sizing_examples#Screen_width_test specifies that 592 pixels works best under that resolution. I'm going to try and find a way of making it scale to the screen size. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ  ^τ _¢ 16:21, 23 April 2010 (UTC) reply

I'm working on it... you might like the finished product! Haljackey ( talk) 16:24, 23 April 2010 (UTC) reply

I got it down to 662 pixels. Resizing it to 592 looks ok. I put it in the sandbox here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ontario_Highway_401/sandbox#Collector-Express_System

this is what it looks like, which is kind of weird. When its below the TOC, it makes a constant left margin. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ  ^τ _¢ 17:03, 26 April 2010 (UTC) reply

Ok, never mind with that then :P. Haljackey ( talk) 17:07, 26 April 2010 (UTC) reply

Given the limited amount of information that could ever be available for a specific city, I don't think it's necessary to have headers beyond South-western / Eastern Ontario and the GTA. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ  ^τ _¢ 20:07, 26 April 2010 (UTC) reply

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 15:43, 6 May 2010 (UTC) reply

I am wondering if you are still on the fence on this FPC having watched recent responses.-- TonyTheTiger ( T/ C/ BIO/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:FOUR) 05:16, 23 May 2010 (UTC) reply

I'm not sure at this point. Still on the fence I guess. Haljackey ( talk) 23:49, 24 May 2010 (UTC) reply

Since you voiced an opinion at the unsuccessful WP:FPC nomination, I thought you might consider the Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates/Gary Sinise on stage nomination.-- TonyTheTiger ( T/ C/ BIO/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:FOUR) 00:48, 26 May 2010 (UTC) reply

• Sure, why not, I'll support ya. Haljackey ( talk) 01:27, 26 May 2010 (UTC) reply

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User talk:Greg L, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. From thanks, Thesmatestguy 04:04, 31 May 2010 (UTC) reply

Hi there, I fixed the problem. I was adding a new section to an existing section. I see the possible confusion that may have made. I have since fixed that by leaving him a new message. Haljackey ( talk) 04:10, 31 May 2010 (UTC) reply

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Evacuated Highway 401 Color.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Jujutacular  T ·  C 13:45, 8 June 2010 (UTC) reply

Hey, saw your note on the nomination page. Unfortunately, August 10 is already reserved: Template:POTD/2010-08-10. Maybe the day before would work. Like Nautica said, inquire with Howcheng. Thanks again for your contributions to FPC! Jujutacular  ^{T ·  C} 20:06, 8 June 2010 (UTC) reply

You are being contacted because you have in the past participated in the Valued Picture project. The VPC project is suffering from a chronic lack of participation to the point that the project is at an impasse. A discussion is currently taking place about the future of this project and how to revitalize the project and participation. If you're interested in this project or have an idea of how to improve it please stop by and participate in the discussion.

—  raeky T 11:05, 2 August 2010 (UTC) reply

I'm not going to get into details, but I think you know that uploading it on flickr doesn't make it yours, unfortunately. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ  ^τ _¢ 05:50, 15 September 2010 (UTC) reply

I've got the ok from the creator of the image, but he doesn't know how to get it on here. I was thinking that was the best way to get it on for now. I'll edit the details as I get more info. Guess I'll revert the image until I have it. Haljackey ( talk) 14:58, 15 September 2010 (UTC) reply

Send them the fill out form available here, and email it to permissions-commonswikimedia.org, preferably from an email address on the same domain as the image is hosted. Let me know if you need a hand with it or anything, I'd really love to see that image used. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ  ^τ _¢ 15:42, 15 September 2010 (UTC) reply

Will do. Oh and by the way, he also has it up on Flickr (but in a different shade) but its under all rights reserved (link: http://www.flickr.com/photos/redroom_studios/1440036557/). If that was changed to some rights reserved would it be ok to use or does he still have to go and fill out that form? Haljackey ( talk) 17:15, 15 September 2010 (UTC) reply

If he changes it to attributed and/or share-alike, then you could upload it and link the flikr url as the source. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ  ^τ _¢ 22:44, 15 September 2010 (UTC) reply

Awesome, I'll see what I can do. Haljackey ( talk) 02:22, 16 September 2010 (UTC) reply

lol, turns out the photo isn't his either. Any ideas from here? Haljackey ( talk) 00:12, 17 September 2010 (UTC) reply

I figured that would be the case. I'm pretty sure it was taken by the MTO for one of their many reports (I have seen the picture on one of the older reports. 2007 SHP if I remember correctly). So really it's a case of trying some more to get a better picture and replacing the current photo once that is found, or giving up and only mentioning it in text. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ  ^τ _¢ 00:51, 17 September 2010 (UTC) reply

I'll keep trying lol. It's the widest stretch of the 401, and one of the widest in the world, so it's a powerful photo to use.

• Speaking of photos, I'll have access to a good Digital SLR camera over the next little bit. Any photos you want from the London area? I'm willing to go as far as the 401/403 split in Woodstock. I could also retake some shots I took with my camera for better quality. Haljackey ( talk) 02:55, 17 September 2010 (UTC) reply

Actually, some shots of Highway 4 and 402 would be really useful (and 3 if you're willing to go south that far). If you can get the 401/402 split or the 401/403 split, they'd be useful as well. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ  ^τ _¢ 05:38, 17 September 2010 (UTC) reply

Highway 4 is just a regular road around here, not much to set itself apart. I already got the 401-402 split in one of my shots. There is an overpass closer to the split, but it doesn't have sidewalks so it would be really difficult to do. As for the 401/403, not sure if there is a good place to get a shot of it. I got a great place where I can get a shot of Highway 3 in St. Thomas (the expressway part). I'll be heading there anyway on Sunday so it should be easy to get, but I won't have access to a digital SLR then. Haljackey ( talk) 13:07, 17 September 2010 (UTC) reply

Any shot is good. Even a nice shot of 4 disappearing into the rural horizon would be ok. As it is though, there's no photo for it at all. Doesn't matter if you don't have the DSLR, it's not like your normal camera takes crappy pictures :p A picture from one of the overpasses showing the width of the trench vs. the two lane "expressway" would be awesome. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ  ^τ _¢ 15:20, 17 September 2010 (UTC) reply

Didn't get a chance to take a photo of the Saint Thomas Expressway (it was raining) but I did manage to get two half-decent pictures of Highway 4. They're in the article now: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontario_Highway_4 Haljackey ( talk) 00:36, 20 September 2010 (UTC) reply

Took a DSLR for a spin yesterday. Got 6 good pictures of the 401 in London. They'll be up on the commons page later today. Haljackey ( talk) 01:41, 26 September 2010 (UTC) reply

JCbot ( talk) 01:51, 4 December 2010 (UTC) reply

I reverted your addition to the page. If I didn't, the bot would on its next update anyway. The only way to get something listed on the RC page is to tag that article/file/etc as part of the project, which I have done as well. Now the bot will add the photo it its standard formatting, and the manual addition won't be reverted. (The caption is not part of that format, btw.) Imzadi  1979  → 07:13, 28 December 2010 (UTC) reply

All right, it's no big deal. I saw pictures in the US section, so I thought I may as well add one for Canada. If you don't want it it's fine. Haljackey ( talk) 15:55, 28 December 2010 (UTC) reply

I don't think you can add the caption since its automated. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ  ^τ _¢ 16:10, 28 December 2010 (UTC) reply

(edit conflict) NO! I do want it. I just know that any manual editing of that page will be reverted by the bot the next time it edits. I copied the template from the USRD page for the CRWP, UKRD and HWY pages to set them up. They will all have any featured photos inserted in the pages by the bot. The problem is that the bot uses the banner template transclusions to determine what to include. File talk:Evacuated Highway 401 Color.jpg wasn't created with the {{ CRWP}} tag, so the bot didn't know to include it. The bot made an update which not only added the photo, but added the newest GA New Brunswick Route 95 and added the DYK dates. (Since that's a relatively new option to display and even sort DYKs by the Main Page date that I added to the template.) In short, just like the Article Alerts page, the Recognized content page can't be manually edited, or the appropriate bot will overwrite your changes every time it updates. Imzadi  1979  → 16:17, 28 December 2010 (UTC) reply

Hey don't know if you've noticed the stub removal drive I've had at WP:ONRD. I was wondering if you'd be ok with, or interested in merging the multiple stub articles on the arterials in London into a list format similar to List of Ontario Tourist Routes or the sandbox version of List of roads in Toronto that I'm working on? It would help cut down the amount of work that needs to be done and any of the more substantial articles can always be left separate. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ  ^τ _¢ 02:24, 24 January 2011 (UTC) reply

I'm ok with it. The road articles for London are incomplete to say the least. Feel free to remove any stubs you see fit. Haljackey ( talk) 02:38, 24 January 2011 (UTC) reply

I have tried to state this as simply as possible. Use WP:BRD cycle, now you are edit warring, have violated WP:3RR, and risk being blocked from editing. UrbanNerd ( talk) 05:07, 5 April 2011 (UTC) reply

How have I done this? Aren't you the one who's changing the edits? I took action and followed this WP:BRD thing you later brought up by discussing it on your talk page. Should this have been done on the article's talk page instead? If yes then my bad. I have never had a problem on this site and I would prefer to work together on this issue rather than bicker at this. I have helped make both the London and 401 articles GAs (good articles) and work with others to make the articles better. If you are going to constantly swap my photo without giving reason (which you did until earlier today) then I felt the only option left to me was to delete my photo. Haljackey ( talk) 05:19, 5 April 2011 (UTC) reply

The "screw you guys, I'm goin' home" approach isn't the friendliest option to choose from. WP:BRD is not a binding policy at all, and it itself says not to use it as an excuse for edit warring. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ  ^τ _¢ 05:38, 5 April 2011 (UTC) reply

Hi Haljackey

A courtesy note to let you know that I moved your photo on the Motorway Talk Page to the top of your article. I beleive that it is better ther as it lines up with your text. (Mine follows). Martinvl ( talk) 21:09, 20 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Hello Haljackey,

Thanks for writing Good work. I support this. at 05:44, 17 June 2011 (UTC) on Floydian's talk page, in relation to a merger proposal. Would you be so kind to add your supporting message in the merger discussion on the talk page of the article in question? Here: Talk:Limited-access road#Merger proposal. Thanks. Nankai ( talk) 04:40, 21 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Consider it done. Haljackey ( talk) 00:41, 22 June 2011 (UTC) reply

please pop in to Talk:Limited-access road to discuss the redirect for Expressway Nankai ( talk) 21:36, 23 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Simcity 4 Interchange.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster ( talk) 23:24, 18 October 2011 (UTC) reply

Hi Haljackey - I note you reversed this edit by an IP editor who wiped out the sister city listed in London, Ontario. I saw that person's edit as well, but I left it because I can't find evidence that London and Nanjing are still sister cities. Have you been able to find a reference for this? PK T(alk) 16:45, 1 November 2011 (UTC) reply

The London to China website states that we have a sister city, and do did a recent article in the London Free Press. I'll try to source those to back it up. Haljackey ( talk) 18:05, 24 November 2011 (UTC) reply

Hello, In order to better assess the activity at the Canadian Roads WikiProject, all members that had an Active status have been changed to Pending. If you are still interested in assisting the project, fielding inquiries by fellow editors, and participating in group discussions, please visit WP:WikiProject Canada Roads/Participants and change the {{Partial|Pending}} beside your username to {{Yes|Active}}. On February 28, the remaining users that are listed as pending will be switched to inactive.

-- ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ  ^τ _¢ 23:41, 19 January 2012 (UTC) reply

Traffic volumes

Location		Windsor	London	Woodstock	Cambridge	Mississauga	Toronto	Oshawa	Belleville	Kingston	Brockville	Cornwall
Section		Dougall Parkway – Essex County Road 46	Highbury Avenue – Veterans Memorial Parkway	Oxford County Road 59 – Highway 403	Highway 8 – Highway 24	Mississauga Road – Hurontario Street	Weston Road – Highway 400	Park Road – Simcoe Street	Highway 62 – Highway 37	Frontenac County Road 38 – Sydenham Road	Highway 29 – North Augusta Road	Highway 138 – McConnell Avenue
Traffic volume ( AADT)	1969	9,550	17,450	16,700	19,900	28,450	106,850	29,000	13,750	12,000	10,050	10,300
	1988	13,200	33,800	35,100	50,400	97,100	319,600	79,000	22,500	20,700	15,300	12,900
	2008	16,700	64,500	67,100	125,600	177,300	442,900	120,700	43,500	45,400	29,100	18,400
Average annual daily traffic counts of selected sections of Highway 401 over 40 years

Lane count

Location		Highway 3 to Dougall Parkway	Dougall Parkway to Essex County Road 42	Essex County Road 42 to Highway 402	Highway 402 to Highway 403/410	Highway 403/410 to Highway 427	Highway 427 to Highway 27	Highway 27 to Highway 409	Highway 409 to Brock Road	Brock Road to Salem Road	Salem Road to Burnham Street	Burnham Street to Frontenac County Road 38	Frontenac County Road 38 to Montreal Street	Montreal Street to Quebec Border
Lane Count		4 Lanes	6 Lanes	4 Lanes	6 Lanes	18 Lane collector-express system	8 Lanes	10 Lanes	12-16 Lane collector-express system	10 Lanes	6 Lanes	4 Lanes	6 Lanes	4 Lanes
Distance		2.5 km	43.1 km	127.5 km	161.3 km	5.8 km	0.8 km	3.9 km	43.3 km	6.0 km	68.3 km	138.2 km	8.2 km	209.0 km
Number of through lanes on Highway 401 (excludes ongoing or planned widening projects)

This is a note to let the main editors of Ontario Highway 401 know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on April 14, 2012. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/April 14, 2012. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director Raul654 ( talk · contribs) or his delegate Dabomb87 ( talk · contribs), or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. The blurb as it stands now is below:

Ontario Highway 401 is a 400-series highway in the Canadian province of Ontario stretching from Windsor to the Quebec border. The segment of Highway 401 passing through Toronto is the busiest highway in North America, and one of the widest and busiest in the world. Together with Quebec Autoroute 20, it forms the transportation backbone of the Quebec City–Windsor Corridor, along which over half of Canada's population resides. The entire route is maintained by the Ministry of Transportation of Ontario and patrolled by the Ontario Provincial Police. The posted speed limit is 100 km/h (62 mph) throughout its length. In 2011 construction began on a westward extension of Highway 401. This new route will generally follow, but not replace, former Highway 3 between the current end of the freeway and the E. C. Row Expressway, at which point it will turn and follow that route to a new border crossing. ( more...)

UcuchaBot ( talk) 23:02, 10 April 2012 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:ZelAlpha.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 09:56, 13 June 2012 (UTC) reply

Very nice... if the file size isn't too large, and you can convert it to the Ogg format, you could upload it to enwp/commons and put it directly in the article in place of a photo. The only thing is that you would need freely licensed music (or no soundtrack). Imzadi 1979  → 20:06, 17 July 2012 (UTC) reply

Interesting... I'll consider it. My video program cannot make Ogg format, guess I'll need to find a program and a tutorial for it. I'll see what I can do to get free music, if not I'll leave it blank. Haljackey ( talk) 20:33, 17 July 2012 (UTC) reply

WP:AURD (Australian Roads), is inviting comment on a proposal to convert Australian road articles to {{ infobox road}}. Please come and discuss. The vote will be after concerns have been looked into.

• Wikipedia:WikiProject Australian Roads/RfC:Infobox Road proposal

You are being notified as a member on the list of WP:HWY

Nbound ( talk) 22:55, 8 May 2013 (UTC) reply

Hi there. I Saw a picture of your London Ontario Morning Building Raise photo. Is it okay that I use this photo for our website's banner? We are building a non-profit website for London Ontario. - Thank you for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FireTricker ( talk • contribs) 18:13, 14 May 2013 (UTC) reply

Haljackey, I have not seen your feedback yet? I was hoping it would be okay.

• Oh it should be fine as long as it's credited. Sorry I didn't get back to you sooner! What is your website? Haljackey ( talk) 19:57, 23 July 2013 (UTC) reply

--- Haljackey is there any other way I can contact you more privately? My email is philip20000 at gmail .com. I have wrote on the photo by Mathew Campbell (wikipedia) on the photo and hope this will be enough. Thanks really appreciate your time and effort.

---

Sure, send me an email at haljackey@gmail.com Haljackey ( talk) 14:51, 8 August 2013 (UTC) reply

Upload it ( http://i.imgur.com/GSJj1cb.jpg) and I will crop it, thanks.-- Jd.101 ( talk) 22:29, 22 June 2013 (UTC) reply

• Done. Here you go: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Downtown_Winnipeg_from_above.jpg Haljackey ( talk) 15:23, 23 June 2013 (UTC) reply

Those are some sexy new images you uploaded before the weekend! Some are definitely jumping out at me as considerations for another featured picture. Namely, File:Highway_403_End.jpg and File:Highway_410_Start.jpg. Nice work! - Floydian  ^τ _¢ 17:05, 24 June 2013 (UTC) reply

• lol, thanks! I took a flight from London to Toronto and it flew pretty low since it was a old propeller plane. Sadly, they didn't allow any carry-ons so they are from my cell phone rather than my camera. If you want to see some others, you can find them here: http://imgur.com/a/Ce6j6#0 Haljackey ( talk) 17:27, 24 June 2013 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Don Valley Parkway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Riverdale Park ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:04, 18 August 2013 (UTC) reply

Archives  |  Suggest The Transport WikiProject Newsletter September 2013

In brief (please click):

To stop receiving this newsletter, please remove yourself here. Delivered by Rcsprinter (natter) @ 16:29, 3 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading File:Simcity 4 Interchange.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth ( talk) 19:35, 5 September 2013 (UTC) reply

Some of your files may be unfree. See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 November 1#OTRS pending since June. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 21:05, 1 November 2013 (UTC) reply

Archives  |  Suggest The Transport WikiProject Newsletter November 2013

In brief (please click):

To stop receiving this newsletter, please remove yourself here. Delivered by Rcsprinter (chatter) @ 14:32, 2 November 2013 (UTC) reply

Archives  |  Suggest The Transport WikiProject Newsletter November 2013

To stop receiving this newsletter, please remove yourself here. Delivered by Rcsprinter (message) @ 15:12, 1 January 2014 (UTC) reply

Normally we don't count support declarations if they aren't accompanied by a review of some kind. You may want to take that into account at Wikipedia:WikiProject Highways/Assessment/A-Class Review/Ontario Highway 402. Imzadi 1979  → 04:16, 14 January 2014 (UTC) reply

Archives  |  Suggest The Transport WikiProject Newsletter May 2014

In brief (please click):

To stop receiving this newsletter, please remove yourself here. Delivered by Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (push) @ 19:16, 2 May 2014 (UTC) reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ontario QEW ALT.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 ( talk) 18:26, 10 June 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Hi there. With this edit you wrote "The Highway 401 extension in Windsor opened in 2015. It is a modern 6 lane below-grade freeway with tunnels that contain greenspace above the road. It will connect to the planned Gordie Howe International Bridge." I made a few changes to the caption, but I'm not sure what you mean when you say it is a "freeway with tunnels that contain greenspace above the road." Did they built the tunnels just to avoid disrupting the greenspace above? Could you please also add a source to support this. Thanks. Magnolia677 ( talk) 15:15, 2 July 2018 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC) reply

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ontario Highway 401, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Autoroute 20. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:15, 27 March 2021 (UTC) reply

—delivered by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of Imzadi 1979  → on 19:00, 12 September 2023 (UTC) reply