The article was removed by YellowAssessmentMonkey 23:35, 28 March 2010 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
The article contains many unsourced statements, two sections containing the tag {{ Unreferenced section}} and awkwardly arranged sections. For instance, " Background and writing" contains six small paragraphs. The article should really be compared to the non-FA Bad Romance. Wonderful structure on that article. In my opinion, "Cool" shouldn't even be listed as B-class. – Scarce ✉ 04:33, 2 March 2010 (UTC) reply
There are a lot of other concerns here though; none of the images presently contain alt text, and the toolbox shows that there are presently six dead links in the article (one of which has been dead since 2007!) There are duplicate references (for some reason they are in both the inline notes and a general references section at the bottom) as well. File:GwenStefaniCool.ogg needs a better fair-use rationale and should probably be shortened (my math skills aren't the greatest, but I'm pretty sure that 10% of 3:09 is something quite a bit less than 19 seconds); ditto File:CoolCap1.jpg on the need for a better rationale. MelicansMatkin ( talk, contributions) 05:10, 2 March 2010 (UTC) reply