Category:History organizations based in Kazakhstan
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:merge, redundant category layer with only one subcategory.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 19:51, 30 March 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:18th-century Slovak physicians
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Triple upmerge for now. There are only two people in this category, while the parent (18th-century Slovak people) has 6. Right now this isn't helpful for navigation to diffuse by occupation and century and nationality.
Mason (
talk) 19:22, 30 March 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Centuries in Almaty
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:merge, redundant category layer with only one subcategory.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 16:30, 30 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Support per nom
Mason (
talk) 19:23, 30 March 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. There's no need to diffuse this medical specialty by nationality to this degree. Each of these noms have one or two people in them
Mason (
talk) 22:50, 15 March 2024 (UTC)reply
I think that the Canadian category is big enough with 6, but I'd be fine with adding Irish
Mason (
talk) 12:57, 16 March 2024 (UTC)reply
I will support merging the Irish category too if it is going to be added to the nomination.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 19:36, 16 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep. Part of an established category tree. --
Necrothesp (
talk) 16:13, 19 March 2024 (UTC)reply
That is a circular argument. After the merge very little of the tree will be left.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 07:02, 20 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Additional categories were added to the nomination, relisting to allow time for discussion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk 11:26, 23 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment The entire categorisation scheme of Wikipedia consists of occupation by nationality categories, many with few members. The other issue I see is then having say British and American geriatricians in subcategories but having a large category of geriatricians not divided by nationality. I'm not sure that assists in navigation, either.
AusLondonder (
talk) 22:26, 23 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Due to suspected
WP:MEAT. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
LaundryPizza03 (
dc̄) 12:53, 30 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Merge in principle, but I'd prefer an RfC on the matter of upmerging categories for the sake of navigation. —
Qwerfjkltalk 19:15, 8 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Dallas Hilltoppers football seasons
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
dual merge also to Category:College football seasons – Huh? Why the heck would we want to merge a mere two of 30,000+ college football season articles to create a brand-new category called "College football seasons" – that makes absolutely zero sense.
BeanieFan11 (
talk) 14:31, 22 March 2024 (UTC)reply
It can be populated with many more articles when all subcategories with one or two articles are merged.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 07:33, 23 March 2024 (UTC)reply
That still makes no sense. If I wanted to find seasons of this team, I would look up "Dallas Hilltoppers football seasons", not a broad "College football seasons" category that has the potential for hundreds of thousands of entries! Not to mention such a category would be missing tens of thousands of articles for programs which have more than a few seasons with articles. It just doesn't make sense.
BeanieFan11 (
talk) 18:42, 25 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk 12:51, 30 March 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Children of Ottoman sultans
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Not all of the princes and princesses included in this list are children of the sultan, some are grandchildren.
Векочел (
talk) 14:24, 14 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Merge per nom. It is also a redudant category layer with only two subcategories.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 16:21, 14 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Oppose The fact that you mentioned is good reason to keep the category, it should be used for specifically children of Sultans, illegitimate ones too.
★Trekker (
talk) 18:58, 14 March 2024 (UTC)reply
No, per
WP:OVERLAPCAT, it would largely overlap with the existing princes and princesses categories.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 07:09, 20 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk 13:48, 22 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Qwerfjkltalk 12:34, 30 March 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Academics of the College of the Resurrection
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale:merge, redundant category layer with only one subcategory.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 09:00, 30 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Upmerge for now without prejudice.
NLeeuw (
talk) 14:38, 4 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Early modern history by city
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete per nom. Support rename if kept per nom.
NLeeuw (
talk) 14:39, 4 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:English people by ethnic or national origin
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: A. rename per usage of "descent" in the subcategory names. B. purgeCategory:English Jews because the latter isn't about their ancestors but about what they are themselves (i.e. it is about ethnicity rather than about descent). This is part of a larger stale speedy nomination in which
User:1234qwer1234qwer4,
User:Anomalous+0 and
User:Smasongarrison participated.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 07:46, 30 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep the existing name. The wording suggests it's about something broader than descent; and indeed national origin may not be something to do with or the same as ethnicity or ethnic origin.
83.229.61.201 (
talk) 15:41, 31 March 2024 (UTC)reply
It is not in fact broader, because the subcategories are by descent too.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 19:24, 31 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Support per nom. I'm fine with adding
Category:English Jews to the parent category. Being Jewish is nested under both ethnicity and religion, so as long as we have it in
English people as well as the religion sub cat, I'm fine with purging. (otherwise it gets hidden in
English people by religion)
Mason (
talk) 17:59, 31 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Comment Is this discussion tied to the hundreds of "by ethnic or national origin" categories that have been sitting in Speedy Renames for weeks on the CFD page? If so, that should be mentioned that this one category rename could impact hundreds of other categories. LizRead!Talk! 21:47, 6 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Male television actors by ethnic or national descent
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge for now. The only page in here is already in the relevant subcategories of Kosovan films and LGBT-related films
Mason (
talk) 01:24, 30 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Merge for now, without objection to recreate the category when some more articles are available.
Marcocapelle (
talk) 06:29, 30 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Upmerge for now without prejudice.
NLeeuw (
talk) 14:40, 4 April 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Arabian agnostics
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Category is too small for navigation, isn't a nationality, and is probably not a defining intersection
Mason (
talk) 01:16, 30 March 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Lists of Roman Catholic bishops and archbishops in Bangladesh
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Administrations of prime ministers of the United Kingdom
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Nominator's rationale: Redundant to
Category:British premierships. Administrations of PM's is the same as the Premiership. Since it refers to the same thing, this category is a redundant layer of subcats.
WikiCleanerMan (
talk) 00:01, 30 March 2024 (UTC)reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.