- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 00:29, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
List of historical sites associated with Ludwig van Beethoven
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- List of historical sites associated with Ludwig van Beethoven ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Created by an IP in 2005, this page is completely unsourced and frankly, useless. I don't really see how a reader could ever find this page helpful on its own, the notability is scare if not nonexistent. An article like Timeline of Ludwig van Beethoven might make more sense, but is yet to exist. The lead itself creates some narrow and oddly defined categories with "The following list contains historical sites associated with composer Ludwig van Beethoven. This list is confined to sites that still exist. It must be kept in mind that several of these houses were arbitrarily identified as Beethoven's dwellings in the 1890s." So does this include any place he visited? Places he lived in? Association is an overwhelmingly ambiguous term – probably part of the reason that only around 30 edits have even been made to the page! Aza24 ( talk) 23:30, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Toughpigs ( talk) 02:53, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete It's unsourced, unclear, and pretty blatantly WP:OR. Noahfgodard ( talk) 02:44, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Lightburst ( talk) 03:52, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Lightburst ( talk) 03:52, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 07:42, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete OR and trivia Spiderone 08:57, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Obvious WP:OR. Ajf773 ( talk) 09:57, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. Useless, inaccurate waffle, as per nom.-- Smerus ( talk) 11:24, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Snow delete. It's pathetique! Clarityfiend ( talk) 07:09, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- DeleteWould like to have seen a real such list but this doesn't qualify. TruthLover123 ( talk) 20:14, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
- Snow delete Equivalent to WP:OCASSOC for categories. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 03:21, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.