The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
RL0919 (
talk) 20:26, 13 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Fails notability criteria laid out at
WP:ORGCRIT specifically the in-depth coverage required, not just a few industry
trade rag mentions or nn awards. The only thing coming close to coverage in a big-name RS is the Popular Science "gadgets award" (the one labeled LA Times is actually their blog platform) and that's not sufficient to sustain an article. ☆
Bri (
talk) 19:26, 6 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete - Nothing comes close to
WP:ORGCRIT. In fact, even Popular Science award isn't close to ORGCRIT. It may be a good company, but the references do not add up to notability for Wikipedia. --
CNMall41 (
talk) 18:58, 7 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete Wikipedia is not the Yellow Pages not a platform for promotion. I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability, topic fails GNG and
WP:NCORP.
Delete - per nomination -
MA Javadi (
talk) 21:57, 10 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Delete per nomination context.
Abtehas98 (
talk) 18:53, 12 September 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.